Sie sind auf Seite 1von 100

Stress

Introduction
The stress tensor
Cauchy formula
Principal stresses
Mohr circle
Pore pressure
Mohr-Coulomb criterion
Power-law creep
The state of stress in the lithosphere
Recommended reading is:
Means, Stress and strain: Basic concepts of continuum mechanics for geologists
Turcotte and Schubert, Geodynamics
Pollard and Fletcher, Fundamentals of structural geology

Stress: Introduction
Geologists and geophysicists use stress rather than forces. Why?
Consider two blocks of different cross-sections. Intuitively, the
blocks whose cross-section is smaller is going to deform a lot
more than the other.

Fig. from Twiss and Moores

For this reason, it makes sense to work with stresses.


STRESS = FORCE/AREA
Pascal=Newton/m2

Stress: Introduction.

A stress of 1Pa is very small. For example, the load due to 1m


of water is about 104Pa
So it is better to use MPa
Other units are bars and atm:
1MPa = 106Pa = 10bars = 9.8692atm

Stress: Introduction

The traction is a vector


quantity that acts at a point
on an imaginary or real
surface of arbitrary
orientation.
The traction at a point on a
surface is equal and opposite
to the traction that at that
same point for the same
surface with opposite
outward unit normal vector.

Stress: Introduction
In general, a stress acting on a plane may be expressed as a sum
of shear and normal stresses.

Normal stress: The component of stress acting perpendicular to


the plane
Shear stress: The component of stress acting parallel to the
plane

Stress: Introduction
Consider a small cubic element of rock extracted from the Earth.
The stress acting on this element may be visualized as follows:

The first index indicates the plane in question


The second index indicates the direction at which the stress
acts

Stress: Introduction
The sign convention adopted by geophysicist differs from that
adopted by engineers:
In engineering, the stress is positive if it acts in the positive
direction on the positive plane. In other words, the stress is
positive in tension and negative in compression.
In geophysics, the stress is positive if it acts in the negative
direction on the positive plane. In other words, the stress is
positive in compression and negative in tension. [This is
because the stresses in the Earth are compressive (although
locally tensional stresses are possible too)].

Stress: The stress tensor

It is convenient to pack the stress components into a tensor


form. In 3D:
!
12 13
# 11
ij = # 21 22 23
##
" 31 32 33

In 2D (that is, when

13 = 31 = 23 = 32 = 33 = 0
!
12
ij = # 11
# 21 22
"

$
&
&
%

$
&
&
&&
%

):

Stress: The stress tensor

The stress tensor is symmetric:


Unless the torque is equal to
zero, the block will rotate. In the
example below, the condition of
zero torque may be written as:
( xy y z ) x / 2 + ( yx x z ) y / 2 = 0

And we get that: xy = yx . So the


number of independent
parameters is equal to 3.
Similarly, in 3D we get that: xy = yx , xz = zx and yz = zy , and the
number of independent stress components is equal to 6

Stress: Cauchy formula


Consider a small cubic element of rock extracted from the earth,
and imagine a plane boundary with an outward normal, n, and an
area, A cutting through this element - so it is reduced to a
triangular element with sides 1 and 2.

Stress: Cauchy formula


The force components acting on sides 1 and 2 are:
1.
f1x = xxAcos

f1y = xyAcos
f 2x = yxAsin
f 2y = yyAsin .

Note that:
2.

cos = n x
sin = n y.

Replacing 2 in 1 gives:
3.

f1x = xxAn x
f1y = xyAn x
f 2x = yxAn y
f 2y = yyAn y .

Stress: Cauchy formula


Force balance leads to:

f
f

= t xA xxAn x yxAn y = 0

= t yA xyAn x yyAn y = 0.

Rearranging the above:

t x = xx n x + yx n y

t y = xy n x + yy n y .
This is equivalent to:

t j = ij n i ,

where tj is the traction acting on ni.

Stress: Principal stresses


We have learned that the stress tensor is symmetric. A property of
symmetric matrices is that they may be diagonalized. The
transformation from the non-diagonal to the diagonal tensor
requires transformation of the coordinate system. The axes of the
new coordinate system are the principal axes, and the diagonal
elements of the tensor are referred to as the principal stresses.

#1 0 0 &
%
(
ij = % 0 2 0 (.
%
(
0
0

$
3'
Note that the shear stresses along the principal axes are equal to
zero.

Stress: Mohr circle


Given a set of principal stresses, one can compute the shear and
normal stresses on any plane.

Adding vectors in directions parallel and normal to the plane in


question:
F = F cos + F sin
N

FS = F1 sin F3 cos .

Stress: Mohr circle


This is equivalent to:

N = 1 cos2 + 3 sin 2
S = (1 3 )sin cos .
Substituting the following trigonometric identities:

sin 2 = (1 cos2 ) /2
sin cos = sin2 /2.

gives:

1 + 3 1 3
N =
+
cos2
2
2
1 3
S =
sin2 .
2

Stress: Mohr circle


This equation describes a circle on a S vs. N space, with a
center on the horizontal axis at (1 + 3)/2, and a radius that is
equal to ( 1 - 3)/2.

1 + 3 1 3
N =
+
cos2
2
2
1 3
S =
sin2 .
2
(1 + 3)/2 is the mean stress.

A matter of convention:

1 2 3

(1 - 3)/2 is the differential stress.


is the angle between 1 and the normal to the plane - positive
when measured counter-clockwise from 1 .

Stress: Mohr circle


Note that for a given stress tensor, the mean stress is independent
of the plane in question, that is:

mean

1 + 2 11 + 22
=
=
.
2
2

We can thus write the stress tensor as a sum of the mean stress
field and the deviatoric stress field:

#11 12 13 & # mean


&
0
0 & #11 mean
12
13
%
( %
( %
(

=
0

0
+

22
23 (
mean
21
22
mean
23
% 21
%
( %
(
%
( %
( %
(
0
mean ' $ 31
32
33 mean '
$ 31 32 33 ' $ 0

Stress: Mohr circle


Note that:
Shear stresses equal to zero at =0 and 90 degrees.
Maximum shear stress is equal to ( 1 - 3)/2 at =45 degrees.
The shear stresses along the principal directions are equal to
zero.
The principal axes are orthogonal.

Stress: Mohr circle


Mohr circle in 3D
! 90 0 0 $
#
&
ij = # 0 60 0 &
# 0 0 30 &
"
%

Stress: Mohr circle


Mohr circle in 3D
! 90 0 0 $
#
&
ij = # 0 60 0 &
# 0 0 30 &
"
%

Stress: Mohr circle


Mohr circle in 3D
! 90 0 0 $
#
&
ij = # 0 60 0 &
# 0 0 30 &
"
%

Stress: Mohr circle


Mohr circle in 3D
! 90 0 0 $
#
&
ij = # 0 60 0 &
# 0 0 30 &
"
%

Stress: Mohr circle


Mohr circle in 3D
A single Mohr circle describes the variation of shear and normal
stress along a principal plane (a plane that contains 2 principal
axes). The representation of a 3D state of stress is obtained by
the superposition of three Mohr circles, as follows:

The state of stress on planes that are not perpendicular to a


principal plane fall within the shaded area.

Stress: The state of stress

Uniaxial stress: Only one non-zero principal stress. For example:

Biaxial stress: One principal stress equals zero, the other two do
not. For example:

Stress: The state of stress

Triaxial stress: All principal stresses are non-zero. For example:

Axial stress: Two of the three principal stresses are equal. For
example:

Stress: Pore pressure and effective stress


Pressure is a special state of stress in which the shear stress is
equal to zero, i.e.: 1= 2= 3.
Question: How does this state of stress plot on a Mohr diagram?
It is useful to consider two pressures: Lithostatic and hydrostatic.
Lithostatic pressure:
The stress equals the weight of the overlying column of rock.
Plithostatic = g (z)dz.
z

In the absence of tectonic forces or fluids, the state of stress


would be lithostatic.

Stress: Pore pressure and effective stress


Hydrostatic pressure:
The stress equals the weight of a column of water.
Phydrostatic = g water z.

Pore fluid: Is the fluid within the


pores.

Pore pressure: Is the pressure within


the pore fluid.
Usually the fluid is water, but it can
also be oil or gas.
In a granular medium, the pore
pressure acts to reduce the contact
between the grains.

fluid presses out equally in all


directions
in a saturated sediment the
weight of all the water above
produces a pore pressure that
tends to push the grains apart

Stress: Pore pressure and effective stress


Effective stress:

effective stress = normal stress - pore pressure


The effective stress tensor is:
$11 P
12
13 ' $11 12 13 ' $ P
&
) &
) &
22 P
23 ) = & 21 22 23 ) & 0
& 21
&
) &
) &

% 31
( % 31
32
33
32
33 ( % 0
Question: Is pressure a vector or a scalar?

0
P
0

0'
)
0)
)
P(

Stress: Pore pressure and effective stress

The effect of pore pressure increase (for example, due to water


pumping) is to lower the effective stress. Graphically, this may be
illustrated as follows:

Stress: Frictional resistance

Question: Given that all objects shown below


are of equal mass and identical shape, in
which case the frictional force is greater?

Stress: Frictional resistance


Leonardo Da Vinci (1452-1519) showed that the friction force is
independent of the geometrical area of contact.

Movie from: http://movies.nano-world.org/movies/frictionmodule/en/

Stress: Frictional resistance


Amontons' first law: The frictional force is independent of the
geometrical contact area.
Amontons' second law: Friction, FS, is proportional to the normal
force, FN:

FS = FN

Movie from: http://movies.nano-world.org/movies/frictionmodule/en/

Stress: Frictional resistance


Byerlee law:
The coefficient of sliding friction for most rock types was
experimentally determined to be 0.6-0.8.
Friction measured at maximum stress

Stress: Frictional resistance

The best fit line in the diagram defines the failure envelope used in
Mohr Circle analysis. Mohr Circle equations and the Coulomb
equation are both used to determine the ideal angle between
maximum stress and the failure plane, which is referred to as .

s = S0 + n tan = S0 + n ,
For a coefficient of friction of 0.7, is equal to 30 degrees.

Question: for equals 30 degrees, compute .

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Show animation from:


http://folk.uib.no/nglhe/e-modules/Chapter%207/07%20Brittle%20deformation.swf

Figure from Structural Geology by Fossen

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Figure from Structural Geology by Fossen

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Shear
stress

Coulomb
equation

Normal
stress

Question: Whats the effect of increasing the pore pressure?

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Shear
stress

Coulomb
equation

Normal
stress

So it is the effective normal stress that we should plug into the


Coulomb-Mohr criterion: s = S0 + n tan = S0 + ( n P ) .

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Shear
stress

Coulomb
equation

The set of two possible


solutions is referred to as
the conjugate set
Normal
stress

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion


Shear
stress

Normal
stress

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Imperial Valley (CA)

Figure from Scholz [1990]

Stress: Coulomb-Mohr criterion

Izu peninsula (Japan)

Figure from Scholz [1990]

Stress: Anderson model

Since the shear stress acting on the free surface is zero, the free
surface is a principal plane. Thus, either 1 or 2 or 3 is
perpendicular to the free surface.

Stress: Anderson model

Vertical 1 gives rise to normal faults


dipping at about 60 degrees.

Vertical 3 gives rise to thrust faults


dipping at about 30 degrees.
Vertical 2 gives rise to strike-slip
faults dipping at about 90 degrees.

Stress: Fault mechanics


We assume x and y are principal
directions of the stress tensor, and yy
is equal to the lithostatic pressure.
Then:
yy = gh
and:
xx = gh +
for a thrust:

> 0
for a normal fault:

< 0

Stress: Fault mechanics


the effective normal stress is:
1.

n = gh P +
(1+ cos2 )
2

and the shear stress is:


2.

=
sin 2
2

plugging 1 and 2 into the Coulomb


criterion we get:
2 ( gh P )
=
.
3.
sin 2 1+ cos2

Stress: Fault mechanics


The crust contains many
preexisting fractures. These
zones of weakness can be
reactivated at an angle that
minimizes the tectonic stress.
The angle that gives the
minimum value of stress is
found via solution of:
d
= 0,
d
which yields:
4.

1
tan 2 = ,

1
and therefore: tan 2 = .

Stress: Fault mechanics

Replacing 4 in 3 gives:

2 ( gy P )
1

2 2
1+

( )

normal

thrust

Stress: Fault mechanics

If the rock is already fractured, faults with certain orientation may


be reactivated (Sibson, 1985).

unfractured
fractured

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

What are the conditions for fault reactivation (Sibson, 1985)?


*

= ,
which may be rewritten as:

*
*
*
*
*
*

sin2

( 1 3)
( 1 3 ) ( 1 3 ) cos2 .

This can be reduced to:

#1* &
R =%
* ( = (1+ cot )(1 tan ).
$ 3 '

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

A plot of the stress ratio for fault reactivation versus the


reactivation angle for =0.75 [Sibson, 1985]:
The optimum angle for
reactivation as a shear fracture
is * with R=4.
R increases to infinity as
approaches 0 and 2*.
R<0 for >2*, which requires
3<0.

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

A further limitation on the


allowable stress states for fault
reactivation is that they must
not induce failure of the
surrounding rock.
The stress circle is constrained
by the the failure criteria of the
intact rock.

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

The role of preexisting foliation for


constant 3

Figure from Fossen

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks


Under constant stress (strain) field, faults rotate.
The range of angles beyond which fault reactivation is impossible is referred to as the
lock-up angles.
Once faults orientation reaches the lock-up angle, they become inactive and a new set
forms.

Figure from Ron et al. [2000]

(the idea that strain accommodation in the brittle crust results in


fault rotation is attributed to Freund [1974].)

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

Brittle deformation: Consequences of pre-fractured rocks

Note that exactly the same fault configuration may result from rotation of the stress
field.

Figure from Ron et al. [2000]


Question: suggest ways to distinguish fault rotation from stress rotation?

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Stress trajectory: A line


indicating the continuous
change in the orientation of a
principal stress throughout a
body. Although trajectories
may curve, their intersections
with other principal stresses
remain perpendicular.

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Superposition of a tectonic
horizontal compressive
stress on the standard state
of stress

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Adding a horizontal shear


stress that increases with
depth and has a constant
magnitude along the base of
the block

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Example for stress concentrators

E1
E2

cavity

inclusion

discontinuities

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Brittle deformation: Theoretical vs. actual strength

The modifying effect of a cavity on the distribution of stress in solid


(Iglis, 1913):

c = a 1+ 2c b .
Elliptical cavity:

Brittle deformation: Theoretical vs. actual strength

Stress concentration for c=3b:

c = a 1+ 2c b .
Schematic Illustration of local stress
concentrations in a material with a
circular and an elliptical hole.
A material withelliptical hole will be
easier to pull apart.

Figure from Fossen

Brittle deformation: Theoretical vs. actual strength

Stress concentration for c=3b:

c = a 1+ 2c b .

Thus, the local stress about a sharp notch or corner could rise to a
level several times that of the applied stress, and even
submicroscopic flaws my act as stress concentrators that weaken
the solid.

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

The figures above show the change in the fault-parallel shear


stress and fault-perpendicular normal stress, due to right-lateral
slip along a dislocation embedded in an infinite elastic medium

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Isochromatics - contours of equal shear stress

Brittle deformation: Stress trajectories and stress concentration

Brittle deformation: Stress determination


1. Faulting and focal mechanism

World stress map

Brittle deformation: Stress determination



2. Igneous dikes
According to Andersons
hypothesis, dikes intrude
perpendicular to the least
compressive stress
Dikes that intrude a region
where the stress field is
homogeneous are
expected to follow straight
path, and are expected to
follow a curved path if the
stress is heterogeneous.

Brittle deformation: Stress determination


2. Igneous dikes

Muller and
Pollard, 1977

Map of Spanish Peaks region of southeastern Colorado with


traces of dikes and trajectories of maximum compressive principal
stress

Brittle deformation: Stress determination


3. Hydraulic fracturing

(The Instantaneous Shutin Pressure (ISIP) is just


sufficient to hold the
fracture open)

Increase the fluid pressure until the wellbore fractures


Record the fluid pressure and fracture orientation
The stress vs. time record is used for the inference of the least
horizontal stress
The magnitude of the least horizontal stress is equal to the ISIP

Brittle deformation: Stress determination


3. Hydraulic fracturing
Measurements of the minimum
horizontal stress as a function of
depth in the 3.5 km deep Cajon Pass
borehole near the San Andreas fault

lithostatic

A series of ISIP measurements were


carried out using both hydro-fractures
and pre-existing fractures
60% lithostatic
(Zoback and Healy, 1992)

Brittle deformation: Stress determination


4. Wellbore breakouts

Although the borehole drill cut is cylindrical, some wellbores


have systematic increase in radii along two diametrically
opposed zones
This fracturing is caused by the stress concentration induced by
the borehole
The interpretation is that the breakouts align with the direction
of the least horizontal stress

Brittle deformation: Stress determination


4. Wellbore breakouts

Map of Western Canada with directions of least


horizontal compressive stress inferred from
wellbore breakouts

Brittle deformation: Stress determination


5. Overcoring
Drill a hole in an intact rock
Install strain gauges at 3
perpendicular directions
Overcore the first hole
The strains on the strain gauges
are used to determine the original
state of stress.
This technique rests on the assumption that the overcoring
completely relieves the stress in the isolated block

Brittle deformation: Stress maps

Fig. from Heidback et al., 2007

Brittle deformation: Stress maps

Fig. from Heidback et al., 2007

Brittle deformation: Stress maps

Breakout: inward-pointing arrows


Hydraulic fracturing: stars
Focal mechanism: circles

Fig. from Townend and Zoback, 2004

Brittle deformation: Stress maps

Breakout: inwardpointing arrows


Hydraulic fracturing:
stars
Focal mechanism:
circles

Fig. from Townend and Zoback, 2004

Brittle deformation: Stress maps

Stress orientations are consistent on regional scale


Boundaries between provinces of uniform stress direction
generally coincide with major structural boundaries
In many regions, the orientation of the maximum compressive
horizontal stress generally coincides with directions of plate
motion
In central California, the axis of maximum horizontal
compressive stress lies at a high angle to the SAF, implying low
friction (this is highly debated matter)

Brittle deformation: Does Anderson theory hold for all faults?


Geological map of Tinos Island (Cyclades, Greece)
Question: What is the
nature of the contact?
Greenschist
Eclogite-Blueschist

Figure from Vapnik and


Avigad [2004]

Brittle deformation: Does Anderson theory hold for all faults?

Brittle deformation: Does Anderson theory hold for all faults?

These low angle


normal faults are
widespread all
over the Cycladic
massif (Greece).
Such tectonic
contacts are
commonly
referred to as
detachments.
Figure from Zeffren et al. [2005]

Brittle deformation: Does Anderson theory hold for all faults?

Very low angle reverse faults are


referred to as low-angle
overthrusts or thrust sheets.
Allochthon: A package of rocks which has been moved a long
way from their original place of deposition.
Autochthon: Rocks that have moved little from their place of
formation.
Klippe: An isolated remnant of allochthon resting on a lower
plate.
Tectonic window: A ''hole'' through the thrust sheet that exposes
isolated area of rocks that lie beneath the thrust.

Brittle deformation: Does Anderson theory hold for all faults?


Chief Mountain (Montana) is an example of a klippe. It consists of
a Precambrian block which rests directly above younger
Cretaceous gray shales. The surrounding portion of the thrust
sheet has be removed by erosion leaving behind this isolated
block of Proterozoic rock.

Brittle deformation: Does Anderson theory hold for all faults?

Find the tectonic window

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults

The problem is: how to force a very thin sheet to slide as a


(almost) rigid body, without causing internal faulting.

Brittle deformation: Coulomb failure criterion in terms of principal


stresses
Recall that the Coulomb failure criterion in terms of normal and
shear stress is:

s = c + n ,
where:
is the coefficient of friction (equals tan)
c is cohesion

The Coulomb failure criterion in terms of the principal stresses is:

1 = C0 + K 3 ,
where:

1+ sin
cos
K=
and C0 = 2c
.
1 sin
1- sin

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults

The problem: is how to force a very thin sheet to slide as a


(almost) rigid body without causing internal faulting.

Force balance along the x direction requires that:


z

x
xx

dz =

zx

dx .

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults

Lets first evaluate the right-hand side of the force balance


equation. Since zx is the frictional resistance to sliding, we write:

zx = n = zz ,
where is the coefficient of friction. The normal stress is just the
lithospheric stress:

zz = gz ,

with being the rock density and g being the acceleration of


gravity. So:
x

zx dx =
0

gzdx = gzx .
0

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults

Next we evaluate the left-hand side of the force balance equation.


We are seeking an expression for the largest xx that the block
can support without breaking. So we'll use the expression for
Coulomb criterion. We identify:
We thus get:
z

xx = 1 and zz = 3 .
z

Kgz
xx dz = (C0 + Kgz)dz = C0z + 2
0
0

Equation the right and left hand sides gives:


2

Kgz
C 0z +
= gzx .
2

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults

Thus, given a thrust sheet of thickness z, the largest x is given by:

C0 Kz
x=
+
.
g 2
We plug in realistic numbers: = 300 (i.e., = 0.6), S0 = 20 MPa,
and = 2300 Kg/m3.

values we get: x = 5.4 km + 2.6 z.


With these
Often, however, it is observed that x >> 5.4 km + 2.6 z

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults

There are several ways out of this paradox:


Rheology is incorrect.
Elevated pore pressure.
My favorite solution for this ''paradox'' is that thrust sheets do not
move as rigid bodies, instead they slide like a wrinkle of a rug!

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults

The wrinkle model:

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults


The wrinkle model:

Figure taken from: http://ic.ucsc.edu/~casey/eart150/Lectures/DefMech/14deformationmechanisms.htm

Brittle deformation: Mechanics of low angle faults


Insight from seismology, the 1992 Landers example and the
carpet wrinkle analogy:

Wald and Heaton, 1994

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen