Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
*Smriti Asthana
**Hamlata Bhat
*** Rahul Singh
Abstract
The Indian logistics industry is growing rapidly. It is the interchange of infrastructure,
technology and new types of service providers that define whether the industry is able to help
its customers reduce their logistics costs and provide effective services. Logistics services are
the backbone of an economy, providing the efficient, cost effective flow of goods and services
on which other commercial sectors are dependent. The logistics companies work as the
outsourced or third party service providers (3PL) and support the organizations logistics
functions.
This study of business performance measurement of 3PL organizations or logistics
outsourcing in Indian logistics industry explores the relationship between 3PL service
providers and supply chain partners (both upstream and downstream). The researchers have
made an attempt to determine the relationship on the basis of the performance variables such
as Service Quality (SQ), Organisational Effectiveness (OE) and Relationship Management
(RM) and there effect on the performance of the third party service provider(s).
1. Introduction
The Indian Logistics Industry is becoming more multifaceted with the business transcending
geographies and logistics chain becoming multimodal and infrastructure dependent (Crisil
Report, 2015 ). A key reason can be identified for the same in the years of high growth in the
Indian economy that have resulted in a remarkable rise in the volume of freight traffic
movement both within and outside the country. The large volume of freight traffic has
provided impetus and growth opportunities in all facets of logistics services.
___________________________________________________________________________
*Research Scholar, Birla Institute of Management Technology, Greater Noida
** Associate Professor, G.L.Bajaj Institute of Management and Research, Greater Noida
***Associate Professor, Birla Institute of Management Technology, Greater Noida
Logistics services broadly comprise of courier services, freight forwarding, third party
logistics (3PL) and reverse logistics. According to a report by Netscribes, 2015 Growing
business of private telecom sector, financial institutions dependence on courier and seasonal
business upsurge due to occasions and festivals are the key drivers of the Courier Market.
3PL providers have largely benefitted from the growth in auto & auto components sector and
retail sector. The trade supply chains have become geographically complex and there is an
increasing dependence on competent transport intermediaries making it essential for the
supply chain organizations and Third Party Logistics (3PL) service provide rs, to develop
strategies that make available differentiated value to the customer at optimum cost (Indian
Logistics Industry Snippets, 2009). Key findings of the 16th Annual 3PL study regarding the
current state of the market for the year 2012 highlighted that 3PLs made valuable
contribution and are an important success factor for the companies across industries and
around the globe. The companies give preference/credit to their 3PL partners which are
helping to provide new and innovative ways to improve logistics effectiveness (State of
Logistics Outsourcing, 2012). Crisil Research (2010) estimates that the 3PL industry
revenues to increase to INR 190 - 195 billion by the end of 2015 from INR 57 - 60 billion in
2009-10. This as result shall lead to a rise in the share of 3PL service providers from 1.5 - 2.0
percent to 3.5 - 4.0 percent in the overall Indian logistics industry.
Business performance measurement has always been a managerial priority, and attracts
increasing interests of both academicians and managers. Managers persistently measure
business
performance
and
request
performance-related
information.
Performance
products but participates in the supply chain at points between the manufacturer and the user
of a given product.
Performance is the outcome that results from actions performed for a particular objective or
goal and performance measurement is determining numbers or quantifying the result.
Historically, when organizations were small and operations in a linear model, the
performance measurement was done on the basis of the cash flow of the organization. From
the late nineteenth century until the 1930s, theoretical and practical methods of management
accounting were established, and standards were widely applied (Maskell, 1991). The
research in performance measurement has evolved since its emergence in 1980s. As
performance measurement research pro gressed, Pursell (1980) focused on the performance
measurement of the entire business unit and examined performance criteria, standards, and
measures.
According to Neely (1995), performance measurement is a popular issue that is widely
discussed but rarely defined. Hence, it is important to introduce certain relevant definitions of
performance measurement. It is defined by few authors as;
Authors/ Researches
Performance Measure ment Definition
Armstrong and Baron Performance Management is both a strategic and an integrated
(1998)
approach to delivering successful results in organizations by
improving the performance and developing the capabilities of
teams and
Bititci et al., (1997)
A process by which the company manages its performance in line
with its corporate and functional strategies and objectives.
Cook et al., 1995
The process of evaluating performance in terms of explicit short-,
medium-, and long-term objectives and reporting the results to
management
The process of transferring the complex reality of performance
Gunasekaran et al., 2001
into a sequence of limited symbols that can be communicated and
reproduced under similar circumstances
Performance measurement is an essential part of the performance
Lebas, 1995
management. By measuring, people transform complex reality
into simplified numerical concepts that can be easily
communicated and acted upon
Neely et al., 1995; 1996 The process of quantifying the efficiency and effectiveness of
action
Rose, 1995
The process of evaluating performance relative to a defined goal.
Sink, 1991
Effectiveness and Efficiency are the two basic parameters determining the organizational
performance. Effectiveness is the extent to which production functions are accomplished and
customer requirements met; and efficiency is a measure of how economically the
organizations resources are utilized in accomplishing these functions. From a quantitative
perspective, performance is related to the dimension of scale, and means that, generally, it
can be quantified in a variety of dimensions. Performance targets are only meaningful when
they can be expressed quantitatively (Macleod et al., 1997).
Rose (1995) highlights in the paper that it is an analytical tool in the performance
measurement process that records measures, displays results, and determines subsequent
actions. Generally, performance measures have financial or non- financial and tangible or
intangible classifications (Polakoff, 1992). Kaplan (2009) believed that measurement was
essential for managers as it was for scientists. Kaplan and Nortan (1992) emphasised that if
companies were to improve the management of the ir intangible assets, they had to integrate
the performance measurement of intangible assets into their management systems. Sink
(1991) found that measurement is complex, frustrating, difficult, challenging, important,
abused and misused, however Das(1994) stressed on the need of performance measurement
processes for an organization with evidence based outcome as if we cannot measure it, we
cannot improve it(Kaplan, 2009).
variables discussed in this study are service quality, organizational effectiveness and
relationship management.
improvement. They proposed a model for assessing the quality of service at various interfaces
of supply chain using third party logistics.
employees, and customer loyalty cannot be presented in the financial reports or analyzed for
future prediction. The findings of the study show that human capital, structure capital, and
customer relationship have a positive association with IC performance.
performance
being
service
quality,
relationship
management
and
organizational effectiveness.
The specific research objectives of this study are presented as follows.
1. To empirically investigate the service quality performance of 3PL service providers with
respect to their supply chain partner organizations (upstream and downstream).
2. To study the relationship framework of 3PL service providers and their supply chain
partners (upstream and downstream) investigating trust, commitment and guanxi.
3. To study the organizational effectiveness in terms of productivity, goodwill and reputation
of the 3PL service providers.
4. Research Methodology
To realize the research objectives, this study is designed to identify the expectation and actual
practice of 3PL organizational performance in Indian Logistics Industry. The researchers
collected data from the supply chain partners (upstream and downstream) and the internal
staff of the leading ten 3PL providers in India. The 3PL service providers located in Mumbai
and Delhi (NCR) and Chennai have been surveyed for the study. The 3PL service providers
with certain commonalities have been selected for this study to facilitate the analysis of
performance measurement between 3PL service providers and their partners.
A total of 600 questionnaires in four groups (3PL expected performance, 3PL actual
performance, customers expectations of 3PL performance, and customers actual experience
with 3PL service providers performance ) were distributed to the target 3PL service providers
and their customers / supply chain partners (upstream and downstream).
Part I of the questionnaire is designed to gather the demographic details of the respondents
and their companies, such as position, type of industry, type o f company, total number of
employees, number of year in operation, annual sales, and the personal information of the
respondents, such as name, designation and contact information.
Part II consists of 12 measurement items that examine the service quality of 3PL service
providers. The respondents were asked to evaluate the extent to which they agreed or
disagreed with statements that addressed the service quality in targeted 3PL providers on a
seven-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).
Part III outlines the 14 measurement items of 3PL organizational effectiveness in four
dimensions: productivity, cycle time, goodwill and reputation and customer service.
Productivity is measured by 5 items, cycle time is measured by 4 items, customer service is
measured by 3 items and goodwill and reputation is measured by 2 items. All of the
measurement items are evaluated in a seven-point Likert scale where 1 represents strong
disagreement and 7 represents strong agreement. Table 4.2 shows the measurement items
of 3PL organizational effectiveness.
The questionnaires were administered physically to ten employees of each of the ten 3PL
service providers in the three locations of Mumbai, Chennai and Delhi-NCR to answer the
questions related to their customers expectations and actual performance delivered in terms
of service quality, organizational effectiveness and relationship management. Similar
questionnaires were also administered to five business partners of each selected 3PL service
provider to identify their expectation in terms of service quality, organizational effectiveness
and relationship management from the service providers and the actual performance received
by them. Two executives from each such organization were randomly selected for the
purpose of the survey. In the selection of the samples, despite potential information bias, only
the key respondents from each company are considered. This is inspired by Teo and King
(1997), in order to avoid potential perceptual discrepancies between respondents. However, it
is still necessary to examine the suitability of the respondents. As this study aims to examine
3PL performance measurement, the target respondents of this study are the senior
management, middle management and front line managers of the selected 3PL service
providers and their business partners (upstream and downstream).
Before distributing the questionnaires to the targeted respondents, a pilot study was
conducted with several industry experts and academic professionals. Based on their feedback,
modifications were made to enhance the clarity of the items. After incorporating feedback
from a pre-test, the revised questionnaire was further pilot tested on a 3PL company, and
included both company employees and customers. Four sets of questionnaires were
administered. Ten expected and actual questionnaires were administered to employees of a
3PL company and twenty expected and actual questionnaires were administered to the
business partners of a 3PL company.
The purpose of the pilot test was to obtain feedback and to test the content validity and clarity
of the measurement scale. A copy of the questionnaire, a covering lettering explaining the
purpose of the pilot study was personally administered to thirty respondents.
4.4 Hypotheses
On the basis of literature review and objectives of the study the major hypothesis developed
are as mentioned below:
H1: The service quality of 3PL service provider has a positive impact on its business
performance with supply chain partners (upstream and downstream).
H2: The quality of relationship management of a 3PL service provider has a posit ive impact
on its organizational performance.
H3: The organizational effectiveness of 3PL service providers has a positive impact on its
service quality and relationship management with supply chain partner organizations
(upstream and downstream).
The research methods used for the purpose of the study are Chi- square Goodness of fit,
Correlation Coefficient Analysis and Cronbachs Alpha.
-
Cronbachs Alpha - To check the reliability of the research instrument the researchers
have used
Correlation coefficient analysis to test the extent of correlation between the three
constructs of SQ, OE and RM
This study examines the performance framework of third party logistics and finds that the
performance measurements are primarily based on common variables with special weight to
Service Quality (SQ), Relationship Management (RM) and Organisational Effectiveness
(OE). The most commonly used statistical software packages of SPSS, MINITAB and MS
Excel have been used for the purpose of this study.
consistency of the scale. It implies that an instrument is stable. The higher the value of the
Cronbachs Alpha coefficient, the higher the internal consistency of the item measurement of
each construct, which indicates the instruments high reliability. Cronbach's alpha is an index
of reliability associated with the variation accounted for by the true score of the "underlying
construct." Construct is the hypothetical variable that is being measured (Hatcher, 1994).
Customers
Expected
0.869
0.876
0.923
Table 5.1 shows the Cronbachs Alpha coefficients for each instrument and the constructs of
3PL service quality, 3PL organizational effectiveness, and relationship management. The
table shows that there is a positive Alpha Coefficient of greater than 0.85 for all the three
constructs hence determines a good reliability of the research instrument.
Nunnally (1978) claimed that a Cronbachs Alpha coefficient of greater than the
recommended value of 0.60 is acceptable for exploratory research. A value of greater than
0.72 reveals that a good reliability has been achieved. Cronbach's alpha increases as the intercorrelations among the measured items increase, and is thus known as an internal consistency
estimate of reliability of the items. Cronbach's alpha is widely believed to indirectly indicate
the degree to which a set of items measures a single unidimensional latent construct.
OE
RM
SQ
RM
SQ
Customer Expected
SQ
OE
0.664
0.42 0.213
RM
0.619
0.42
OE
0.213 0.239
1
0.239 0.887
OE
SQ
3PL Actual
1
0.887 0.076
1
RM
0.101
0.918
RM
3PL Expected
0.076 0.101
1
OE
0.918 -0.06
1
-0.058 -0.048
1
-0.05 0.087
0.087
1
Table 5.2 shows that all the three constructs display moderate to high correlation with each
other. According to the table the correlation coefficients in the Customer Actual group show
a moderate relationship between SQ and OE with correlation coefficient being 0.664 and
between SQ and RM with coefficient at 0.619.However the relation between RM and OE
does not seem to be very strong as the correlation coefficient is only 0.42.This means that
according to the customers the actual performance of the 3PL service provider is not much
effected by the relationship management however, service quality of the service provider
does have a positive impact on the organisational performance.
In the customer expected category the above table shows that the relationship between SQ
and OE and SQ and RM are not having much influence on each other as the correlation
coefficients are 0.213 and 0.239 respectively, which is quite low as compared to the other
category. According to the customers expectations organisational effectiveness (OE) is
directly influenced by the relationship that the service provider has with the customers as
correlation coefficient between RM and OE is 0.887.
According to the data collected from the 3PL service providers (actual) it has been observed
that the correlation coefficient between SQ and OE is 0.76 and between RM and OE is at
0.918 and only 0.101 between SQ and OE. Thus, it shows that there is a high relationship
between the Organisational effectiveness and relationship management and a
moderate
relationship between the service quality and the organisational effectiveness of the 3PL
service provider in terms of their supply chain partners (upstream and downstream).
The data collected from the 3PL service providers (expected) determines that the correlation
coefficient between SQ and OE is - 0.58 and between RM and OE is at 0.087 and - 0.048
between SQ and RM. Thus, according to the representatives of the 3PL service providers it is
expected that the service quality does not have much influence on the Organisational
effectiveness and relationship management of the service provider with their counter parts.
However, the relationship management of the 3PL service provider has a positive impact on
its organisational effectiveness.
For the purpose of the study and hypothesis testing the most commonly used statistical
software package MINITAB has been used. Table 5.1 gives a detail of the results derived by
the application of the tool for the said purpose.
5.3.1 Hypotheses
H1: The service quality of 3PL service provider has a positive impact on its business
performance with supply chain partners (upstream and downstream).
H2: The quality of relationship management of a 3PL service provider has a positive impact
on its organizational performance.
H3: The organizational effectiveness of 3PL service providers has a positive impact on its
service quality and relationship management with supply chain partner organizations
(upstream and downstream).
Assumptions
1) Null Hypothesis: H10 : The service quality of 3PL service provider has a positive impact on
its business performance with supply chain partners (upstream and downstream).
Alternative Hypothesis: H1a: The service quality of 3PL service provider does not have any
impact on its business performance with supply chain partners (upstream and downstream)
Table 5.3
Constructs
Service Quality
Customer Actual
N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
23 12 10.3478 0.585
Respondents
Customer Expected
3PL Actual
3PL Expected
N DF Chi-Sq P-Value N DF Chi-Sq P-Value N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
14 9 3.14286 0.958 18 10 6.44444 0.777 13 6 4.76923 0.574
**Source: Authors own compilat ion fro m primary data.
From Table 5.3 it has been observed that at = 0.05 level of significance the p- value for Chi
Square Goodness of fit test is greater than 0.05 in all the four groups of respondents for the
construct service quality, so we shall accept null hypothesis. Thus, it can rightly be said that
the service quality of the 3PL service provider has a positive impact on its business
performance with the supply chain partners.
2) Null Hypothesis: H20 : The quality of relationship management of a 3PL service provider
has a positive impact on its organizational performance.
Alternative hypothesis: H2a: The quality of relationship management does not have any
impact on its organizational performance.
Table 5.4
Constructs
Customer Actual
N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
Relationship
Management(RM) 22 10
0.629
Respondents
Customer Expected
3PL Actual
3PL Expected
N DF Chi-Sq P-Value N DF Chi-Sq P-Value N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
0.75
0.993
From Table 5.4 it has been observed that at = 0.05 level of significance the p- value for Chi
Square Goodness of fit test is greater than 0.05 in all the four groups of respondents for the
construct relationship management, so we shall accept null hypothesis. Thus, it can rightly be
said that relationship management of the 3PL service provider has a positive impact on its
business performance with the supply chain partners. The respondents feel that relationship
management is an important factor in building strong long term relation and thus improving
the overall organisational performance of 3PL service provider.
3) Null Hypothesis: H30 : The organizational effectiveness of 3PL service providers has a
positive impact on its service quality and relationship management with supply chain
partner organizations (upstream and downstream).
Alternative hypothesis: H3a: The organizational effectiveness of 3PL service providers has
a positive impact on its service quality and relationship management with supply chain
partner organizations (upstream and downstream).
Table 5.5
Constructs
Organisational
Effectiveness(OE) 24 10 16.3333 0.090
*P > 0.05 , N = observed value , n= 150
Respondents
Customer Expected
3PL Actual
3PL Expected
N DF Chi-Sq P-Value N DF Chi-Sq P-Value N DF Chi-Sq P-Value
16 11 6.5
0.838 22 10
12 0.285 21 9
9 0.437
**Source: Authors own compilat ion fro m primary data.
Table 5.5 shows that at = 0.05 level of significance the p-value for Chi Square Goodness
of fit test is greater than 0.05 in all the four groups of respondents for the construct
organisational effectiveness, so we shall accept null hypothesis. Thus, it can rightly be said
that organizational effectiveness of 3PL service providers has a positive impact on its service
quality and relationship management with supply chain partner organizations (upstream and
downstream). The better the performance of the organization the better is its service quality
in terms of reliability, responsiveness, tangibility, empathy and assurance. Also the better the
organizational performance the better is its relationship with the supply chain partners in
terms of trust, commitment and guanxi.
Conclusion
A well developed and networked logistics industry is vital to the success and overall growth
of the economy as efficient supply chain management gives industry a competitive
advantage. This Study provides insight into several factors that relate to the success of 3PL
service provider and supply chain partner relationships: service quality, organisational
effectiveness and relationship management to accommodate current and future business
needs and challenges. 3PL industry initially was a transaction based service but has gradually
evolved into a more strategic function that is integral to an organisations operational
activities and its adoption in the Indian industries is likely to gain momentum with the
increasing number of organisations embracing the concept for the enhanced operational
efficiency provided by the 3PL service providers.
References:
Aguezzoul, A.(2009), The Third Party Logistics Selection: a Review of Literature, Hal00366527, version 1.
Armstrong, M. and Baron, A. (2004) Managing performance: performance management in
action.
Chartered
Institute
of
Personnel
and
Development.
http://www.ukessays.com/essays/management/armstrong-and-baron-define-performancemanagement.php#content#ixzz3RVlBt698
Bititci, U.S., Carrie,A.S., McDevitt, L. (1997), Integrated performance measurement systems:
a development guide, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 17
Iss: 5, pp.522 534
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS(R) system for factor
analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Halldrsson,A., Larsen,T.S. (2004), Developing logistics competencies through third party
logistics relationships, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.
24 Iss: 2, pp.192 - 206
Hannon D (2005), Shippers Lean on 3PLs to Secure Capacity, Gain Agility, Purchasing, Vol.
134, No. 7 (April), pp. 53-58.
Juran, J.M. and Godfrey, A.B.,(1999) Jurans Quality Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Fifth Edition
Kaplan, R.S.(2009), Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard, Paper originally
prepared for C. Chapman, A. Hopwood, and M. Shields (eds.), Handbook of Management
Accounting Research, Elsevier, Volume 3,
Laarhoven, P., Van Berglund, M., and Peter, M. (2000). Third-party logistics in
Europe Five year later, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics
Management, 30(5), 425-442.
Lai, K. H., Ngai, E. W. T., and Cheng, T. C. E. (2004). An empirical study of supply
chain performance in transport logistics, International Journal of Production
Economics, 87, 321-331.
Lau, (1999). Importance of third party logistics, Shippers Today, 22(1), 51-53.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., and Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system
design: A literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations
and Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Gregory, M., and Richards, H. (1996).Performance
measurement system design: Should process based approach be adopted?
International Journal of Production Economics, 16(3), 423-431.
Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
Olsen, S.O., (2002) Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality,
satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (3),
240249.
Panayides, P. M. and Meko.S., (2005) The Impact of Integrated Logistics Relationships on
Third-Party Logistics Service Quality and Performance, Maritime Economics & Logistics,
2005, Vol. 7, pp. 3655
http://www.crisil.com/research/logistics.html
Netscribes (India) Pvt. Ltd., Logistics Services Market in India 2015, February 10,
2015