1

Irsha:d Al H:aqq Ath:ari: is one of the highest eminent scholars in the Pakistanian
Part of Sub Continent
South Asia. Even the former Teacher of Ali Mirza namely Zubair Ali Zai accepted
his superiority.
He is definitely greater than Zubair Ali Zai, and Zubair Ali Zai is Certainly Greater
than Ali Mirza [ even according to many Alimirzais].
Maulana Irsha:d Al Ath:ari Hath defended Saiyiduna Muaviah and refuted many
arguments of Rafid:ites ,which are often borrowed by the Engineer namely
Muh:ammad Ali Mirza of Jhelum.
One of the Ali Mirzas argument is from the Text of a Hadith: which says that the
Rsu:luna: Holy prophet said for Saiyiduna Muaviah :=
May ALL-H not Fill His Stomach
Ali Mirza claims that this is a curse and not a blessing .
But what is the view of Maula:na: Irsha:d Al H:aqq Athari: ?
Maula:ana: Irsha:dul H:aqq Ath:ari: Hath written a book about the disputes of
S:ah:abah and refuted many views of Rafid:is which are common between Ali Mirza
and Ravafid: of the past.
The name of his book is M-sha;j-ra:t of S:ah:abah and the Opinion of Salf.
;
Below we are providing some of the comments of Irshad Al Haqq Haqqi from an
other book namely Religious Stories [in 4 volumes]

Prerequisite
1]Maulana H:abi:bur Rah:ma:m Kalandhvi a semi
denouncer of H:adi:th: wrote a book in four
volumes in order to refute unauthentic traditions
about S:ah:a:bah.
But he secretly conspired against the Holy Books
of Bukha:ri: and Muslim.
1

He tried to disprove a number of traditions of

Bukha:ri: and Muslim.
Sensing this Maula:na: Irsha:d Al H:aqq Athari
wrote a book namely ---------In this book Maula:na: Irsha:d Al Haqq Ath:ari
refuted all the arguments of H:bib Ar Rahma:n
Kalandhvi which are against Holy Bukha:ri and
Holy Muslim.
2] In his book H:Abibur Rah:ma:n Kalandhvi
commented upon the tradition of Holy Muslim in
which Holy Prophet is reported to say May ALL-H
not Fill His Stomach.
H:abibur Rah:ma:n made two comments on the
Tradition of Holy Muslim.
a)
He made the commentary on the Text of
H:adi:th: .
b)
He tried to shew that this tradition is not a
S:ah:i:h: tradition of highest rank.
Maula:na: Irsha:d Al Haqq Athari: supported
the first and refuted the second.
Below we are providing the quotation from his
book in support of the commentary.
The second part is irrelevant since if a tradition
exists in Muslim then it is Certainly and definitely
S:AH:I:H: with out any shadow of doubt.
2

So we are not producing the part of work In

which Shaikh: Irsha:d Al H:aqq Athari: hath
defended the tradition:=
It is narrated from Respected Ibn Abba:s RD
That Rasu:lulullah S:AVS said to me that go and
bring Muaviah RD. I came back [ after some
time] and said, He is eating [food]. Holy
Prophet [after some time] said [to me] , Go and
bring Muaviah RD.
I came back [again] and said , He is [still]
eating.
Holy prophet said May ALL-H not fill His
Stomach.{Muslim Vol 2 page 325}.
[Researcher (Muh:aqqiq) Irshad Al Haqq
Ath:ari first quotes the sentences of H:abi:b Ur
Rahma:n Kalandhvi as follow:=]
Respected Kalandhvi hath confessed ,
This Tradition is not a curse [upon Respected
Muaviah RD] rather it is a pray of Blessing [To
ALL-H] for Him ,and a medium for closeness to
ALL-H.
(Madh:babi Dastanain/Religious Stories).
Beyound doubt what that is stated by Respected
Kalandhvi is correct.
3

1)Allama Navavi in Sharh: Mulim,2)H:afiz: Zhaibi: in Syr -la:m, 3)Allamah ibn Kath:i:r in
Al B-da::yah, 3)Allamah Ibn H:ajr in Tah:h:ir Jna:n Val L-Sa:n ,page 28
Have consider this tradition in Fad:a:il of
Mua:viah.
Allamah Al Ba:ni: in S-S-LATUS: S:AH:I:YAH Vol 1
page 121, hath stated about this H:adi:th: and
condidered it in Vitures /Fad:a:il OF Muaviah
RD.
Ibn Asa:kir hath additionally stated this
H:adi:th: and reported that this is the most
authentic tradition in the virtues of Muaviah
RD.

[Note the words in blue Andalus ids of Muh:aqqiq

Irsha:d Al H:aqq Athari: .
All the Text between two symples of is a
quotation from the book of ,Muh:aqqiq Irha:d Al
H:aqq Athari: ]
This does mean that Engineer Ali Mirza hath an
incorrect conception of H:adi:th: .
A scholar of highest Eminent like Muh:aqqiq
Irsha:d Al H:aqq Ath:Ari: who generally
opposed H:abibur Rah:ama:n for his semi denial
4

of H:adi:th: acceped his explanation and provide

additional proofs in support of this view.
But against all great Sunni scholars of Highest
Eminent , Respected Ali Mirza considers this
traditiona as a Curse instead of Blessing.
Respected Ali Mirza thinks that he is the only
person who understood the tradition correctly
and all the other scholars are just erring either
intentionally or
Unintentionally.
At this point Ali Mirza contradicts the following
great scholars on the question whether this
Tradition is a curse or blessing:=
1] Navavi
2]Z-h-ibi:
3]Ibn Kath:i:r
4]Al Ba:ni:
5]Ibn Asa:kir
6] Irsha:d Al Ath:ari:
All these scholars are one one side and Ali
Mirza: is on another side.

This is self evident that Ali Mirza is not

attacking the authenticity of the tradition but he
hath a wrong conception of the tradition.
His conception of tradition is against the
common conception of scholars of highest
eminent.
Even the former teacher of Ali Mirza namely
Zubair Ali Zai cannot/couldnot declare the
common conception of scholars of such eminent
as in correct, what to say about EngineerAli
Mirza.
For Sale of ALL-H please study the concepts of
Ali Mirza and compare it with the conmcepts of
Great Scholars like Muh:Aqqiq Atha:ri etcetera
and decide your selves whether Ali Mirza is
heretic or not.
Please consider the lectures of Ali Mirza: like
116 :a to c , etc. and reject atleast such portions
of these lectures and reject all those portions in
which Ali Mirza hath incorrectly interpreted this
H:adith: .