Lab 1 Sampling PDF

Chulalongkorn University
Faculty Engineering
Mining and Petroleum Engineering
COURSE : Mineral processing
SECTION : Laboratory 1
Special Subject: Sampling

Professor : SOMSAK saisinchai
Instructor : Mr Theerayut Phengsaart
Date : 18 August 2015
Name of Students : Mr .SEM Reach , Mr.ROS Sochea,
Miss HOK Malis, Mr. SOUPHAPHONE Volachit
Group 1
2015-2016
Content
Page
I.
II.
III.
IV .
Introduction
01
Objective
. 01
1. Tools and Equipment
2. Equipment Supplied
Method
04
1. Cone and Quartering Method
2. Jones Riffle
3. Table Sampler
4. Table Compare Result of 3 Methods
Conclusion
11
professor : Somsak Saisinchai
Lab 1 : Sampling
I.
Introduction
Definition
A process used in statistical analysis in which a predetermined number of observations will be
taken from a larger population. The methodology used to sample from a larger population will
depend on the type of analysis being performed, but will include simple random sampling,
systematic sampling and observational sampling. The sample should be a representation of the
general population.
The choosing sample is the most important thing that we cannot over it. Preparing the best sample
is the one part to help us to get accuracy data from the experiment in the laboratory. The purpose
of sampling is to provide various types of statistical information of a qualitative or quantitative
nature about the whole by examining a few selected units. The sampling method is the scientific
procedure of selecting those sampling units which would provide the required estimates with
associated margins of uncertainty, arising from examining only a part and not the whole.
The experiment is done in the aim of verifying the theories ,applying the methods to the real
practice .we do the experiment in order to fine out the answer or to test the theory .after doing the
experiment ,we will know how much accuracy is if compare to the calculate and compare with the
other methods .if we have difference method, the experiment helps as to find out which method is
the best one ,or which method is has higher accuracy.
Mentioning above ,there are a lot of experiments but in this case we do the experiment on Sampling
Method that is compare to three main methods of sampling procedure :Jones Riffle ,Cone and
Quartering and Table Sampling .We will get the best accuracy method amount the three.
II.
Objective
This experiment ,we will do the comparison of 3 main methods of sampling procedure
:Jones Riffle ,Cone and Quartering and Table Sampling .
To understand about basic technique of sampling.
Experiment Procedure
1. Tools and Equipment
Jones Riffle
Jones Riffle
Limestone 20% of mass
Iron ore 80% of mass
Salver
Weighing
Submitted By Group 1
Page 1
Total (weight of Limestone and Iron ore) =1831 g
Cone and Quartering

Splitter
Salver
Knife
Glove
Table Sampler
Table sample
Salver
Glove
2. Equipment Supplied
Fig1: Limestone and Iron ore
Fig 3: Cone and Quartering

Fig 2: Table Sampler
Fig 4: Jones Riffle

Page 2
Fig 5 :Electronic Weight
Fig 6: container
Fig 7: Tray
Page 3
III.
Method
In the experiment ,we use three methods , Jones Riffle ,Cone and Quartering and Table
Sampling.
Jones Riffle : used to reduce bulk of represent a convenient material for analysis until the
desired size is obtain .
Cone and Quartering : Used in dividing sample of material .
Table Sample : Used with small and ore .
Process of Experiment
1. Cone and Quartering Method
Pour the mixed sample on the table

Mount the sample by splitting into 4 paths
Keep only two paths and ignore others
Separate the minerals apart and weight iron ores (brown) & white limestone and then
take a note.
Remixed and Doing like this for 8 times
A
D
B
C
Page 4
Result:
Sample Total = 1831g, Limestone 20% = 366.2g, Iron Ore 80% = 1464.8g
N
Limestone (g)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
27
28
25
22
26
27.4
21
28
Total =
Average =
Arithmetic =
Error=((X-10)/10)*100=
Variance=
Standard deviation=
Limit X for (95% level=
Iron ore(g)
94
98
85
98
105
114
73
114
Sum(g)
121
126
110
120
131
137
94
142
%
Limestone
22.31404959
22.22222222
22.72727273
18.33333333
19.84732824
20
22.34042553
19.71830986
%Iron ore
77.68595041
77.77777778
77.27272727
81.66666667
80.15267176
83.21167883
77.65957447
80.28169014
Error %
Limstone
23.14049587
22.22222222
27.27272727
-16.6666666
-1.52671755
0
23.40425532
-2.81690140
167.502941
9.37867681
20.937867
9.37
2.3815468
1.54322611
19.64% To 22.21%
Page 5
2. Jones Riffle
Preparation Limestone and iron ore
Mixing Limestone and iron ore about 1.831 kg with ratio 2:8 per /mass
Bring mixed limestone and iron ore together input in Jones Riffle and Jones
Riffle will separated (limestone and iron ore) sample into parts ,the right and left
part . we process it 4 times with 1 in 8 of which will be entered by exchange the
lefe one time ,then the right and the last is the left.
After that ,we select the grain of limestone to weight and iron ore to weight with
the recorded each weight of those. we do this in order to calculate percentage of
white sandstone in the example .
After weight ,we take them to combine with the rest of store and than redo that
process as before about 8 times .
Calculate the average ,Variance ,Standard deviation and limit.
Limestone
Iron ore
Page 6
Results
N
Limestone
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
29
26
27
22
27
26
18
31
Iron ore Sum

% Limestone
%Iron ore
Error % Limstone
69
98
29.59183673
70.40816327
95.91836735
81
107
24.29906542
75.70093458
42.99065421
104
131
20.61068702
79.38931298
6.106870229
92
114
19.29824561
80.70175439
-7.01754386
129
156
17.30769231
82.69230769
-26.92307692
89
115
22.60869565
77.39130435
26.08695652
93
111
16.21621622
83.78378378
-37.83783784
86
117
26.4957265
73.5042735
64.95726496
Total =
Average =
Arithmetic mean =
Error=((X-20)/20)*100=
Variance=
Standard deviation=
176.4282
20.655207
22.05352
20.65
18.52255
4.303783
18.46% To 25.63%
Page 7
3. Table Sampler
Limestone 20% of total mass
Iron ore :80% of total mass
We mix limestone and iron ore equal to 1831g=1.831kg
Inject sample into table sample equipment .some rocks flow into the holes while
some flow outside the holes .the amount of rock go into the hole way are not
much than the rock go to not hole way because there is only on pass way if we
compare to hole way which have 12 holes.
We take the rock pass through the pass way to weigh and record the weight of
limestone and iron ore for calculating the average ,variance ,standard deviation
and limit.
Page 8
Page 9
Data and Results

N-
Limestone(g)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
27
25
29
25
19
35
28
36
Error %
Iron ore (g) Sum(g)
% Limestone %Iron ore
Limstone
97
124 21.77419355
78.22580645 17.74193548
117
142
17.6056338
82.3943662 -23.9436617
95
124 23.38709677
76.61290323 33.87096774
98
123 20.32520325
79.67479675
3.25203252
79
98
19.3877551
80.6122449 -6.12244898
90
125
28
72
80
93
121 23.14049587
76.85950413 31.40495868
77
113 31.85840708
68.14159292 118.5840708
Total =
Average =
Arithmetic Mean =
Error=((X-20)/20)*100=
Variance=
Standard deviation=
185.478785
31.3584878
23.18484818
31.35
19.2715309
4.389935181
19.52% To 26.83%
4. Table Compare Result of 3 Methods

1. Cone and Quartering
Arithmetic Mean
Error limestone %
2. Jone Riffle
3. Table sampler
20.93
22.05
23.18
9.37
20.65
31.35
2.38
18.52
19.27
1.54
4.3
4.38
18.46% To 25.63
19.52% To 26.83%
Variance=
Standard deviation=
Limit X for 95%
level=
19.64% To 22.21%
Page 10
IV.
Conclusion
According to the raw material is with ratio 2:8 of sandstone and iron ore in amount
the total mass is 1.831 kg it equal to 366.2g limestone and1464.8g iron ore .if we
compare to the percentage is 20% of limestone and 80% is iron ore.
Our experiment is in the main purpose is to observe the percentage of limestone and
iron ore whether its still in the sample quantity or not and if it is error.
The result show about the calculate of the three methods .Cone and quartering
method get the good mean about 20.93% compare to the origin percent is 20 % and
Error has 9.37% smallest than 10% ,small if we compare to Jones Riffle and Table
sampler .All the athematic mean of the three methods are in the distance of Limit
confidence .So we conclude that the best method for sampling is Cone and
Quartering.
To conclude, cone and quartering method in sampling has higher efficiency and
lower variance. It can be used as method of sampling in industries since it can
represent the whole materials. After doing sampling, we know how to do sampling
by selecting the best method with higher efficiency and the way to take samples
which represent the whole materials. Last but not the least, we can use statistical
analysis to analyze and making decision.
Page 11
Reference:
1. Mineral processing Laboratory Introduction Department of Mining and Petroleum Engineering
,Faculty of Engineering ,Chulalongkorn University.
2. https://www.easycalculation.com/statistics/confidence-limits-mean.php
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling_%28statistics%29
Page 12

Lab 1 Sampling PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originalbeschreibung:

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Lab 1 Sampling PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Chulalongkorn University

Special Subject: Sampling

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

Total (weight of Limestone and Iron ore) =1831 g

Cone and Quartering

Fig 3: Cone and Quartering

Fig 2: Table Sampler

Fig 4: Jones Riffle

Fig 5 :Electronic Weight

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

Pour the mixed sample on the table

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

Iron ore Sum

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

Data and Results

4. Table Compare Result of 3 Methods

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

professor : Somsak Saisinchai

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen