CAD Jewellery Skills FAQ Frequently Asked Questions Part 1 Comparisons Of CAD Jewellery Software on the Market

(Updated)

Frequently Asked Questions Part 1 Comparisons Of CAD Jewellery Software on

the Market (Updated)
BY CADJEWELLERYSKILLS

18 JULY, 2012

FAQ, JEWELLERY LEARNING RESOURCES

Information last updated and verified Oct 2015

(This marks the first of a series of Frequently Asked Questions posts. See the rest of
the FAQ pages.)
Over the years, the students in my CAD courses as well as my private clients have
asked me a lot of questions about CAD as it relates to jewellery manufacturing. Many
of these questions were often the same. As I thought it better to tailor my answer to
each students needs, I resisted writing a single standard answer for quite a long time.
Then it occurred to me that I could probably answer at least some of the questions all
at once, and just fill in the gaps if people wanted to know more.
This is how this new series simply called Frequently Asked Questions began.
On this and subsequent articles in the same series, I will break down the most commonly asked questions from my own
particular fields of expertise.
If anyone has any more specific questions or is not clear about something mentioned here, just leave a comment and Ill add
an answer to the entry.
For part 1, well start off with the most common question of them all: Which CAD software should I learn?

Sections
1. Why are There So Many Different Kinds of CAD Software?
2. What is 2D Design Software?
3. What is 2D CAD Software?
4. What is 3D CAD Software?
5. What are the Comparative Advantages Of Each CAD Software Package (The Comparative Jewellery CAD Software List)?
6. Do You Have Any Examples of What These CAD Programs are Like to Use?
7. Where Can I Purchase These CAD Programs?

I Want To Learn CAD. Where Do I Start?

The first thing you should do is figure out how you want to use design software. There are actually several different kinds of
computer-aided design software available, each one designed for a different purpose:
2D Design Software such as Photoshop and Gemvision Design Studio
2D CAD Software such as TypeEdit, Adobe Illustrator, Corel Draw, and Inkscape
3D CAD Software such as 3Design, Rhino, PowerShape, Matrix, Firestorm, and JewelCAD
Customer-Facing CAD Software such as Countersketch and Gemvision Design Studio

3D Sculpture Software such as ArtCAM Jewelsmith, Claytools, Mudbox, and ZBrush

Why So Many Different Kinds?

You could be cynical and say that its different companies competing for a piece of the same market, but in truth the tools are
all rather different. Even for tools which serve the same purpose (such as 3Design, Matrix, and Firestorm), they behave in
different ways and were built starting from different design philosophies. Its not uncommon for certain specialists or design
houses to use more than one software package in conjunction. Adobe Illustrator and Rhino, for example.

Okay, So There Are Different Kinds of CAD. What is 2D Design

Software?
2D Design software is a bit like working with a set of
paintbrushes and a palette of colours. Its designed purely for
An example of 2D design software with a digital pen
working with bitmap images (such as photographs or
illustrations) composed of pixels. Tools like these have been
around since the early 80s, so theyve had plenty of time to
come up with clever ways to paint, manipulate, and apply special effects to images. Pretty much everything you could think
of doing with a paintbrush or a photography studio can be done with 2D Design software. The most obvious 2D design
software tool available would be Adobe Photoshop, but it is not the only one. There is also Corel Paint and Sketchbook Pro,
among others. There is even a jewellery specific 2D Design software package Gemvision Design Studio (previously known
as Digital Goldsmith). While perhaps not as flashy as 3D design software, these 2D tools are vital in their own right for
illustrators and draftsmen, allowing them to make paint-ups and renderings of designs in methods as close to the traditional
methods as possible. They also serve a vital role in post-production of photography and CAD renders, preparing and sizing
the images for use in print or on websites. As it happens, I usually recommend that absolute newcomers to any sort of
computer based design start with a 2D design software like Photoshop or Corel. Compared to other types of software, their
learning curve can be much easier, and can help provide a gateway into more complex ways of working.

What is 2D CAD Software, and How is It Different From 2D Design

Software?
Think of 2D CAD software as a technical draftsmans table, compared to 2D Design softwares paintbrushes and palette. Both
can draw a picture, but the purpose of each picture is very different. The purpose of 2D CAD is precision, usually for the
purposes of design communication. Rather than working with bitmaps and pixels, 2D CAD uses vector lines. Whereas pixels
are colours at locations on an image, vectors use points on a page with lines connecting them. There are three big
advantages to using vectors for technical drawings:
The lines are not fixed. They can be adjusted, moved, twisted, scaled, bent, even redrawn in sections.
No matter how big or how small you scale the lines, they will always be redrawn with perfect resolution.
Vector lines are also used by 3D CAD as well as laser engraving and industrial cutting tools. This means you can export
your designs into formats directly useable by both applications, potentially saving the designers or service bureaus time.

What is 3D CAD Software?

3D CAD is what most people think of when they are talking about CAD. Conceptually, its the digital equivalent of fabrication
tools and a wax carving kit. Rather than just simply making designs on a screen, the user is actually building his design to
exact tolerances and specifications. The end result of CAD can be either rendering (producing a photorealistic image) or rapid
prototyping (producing a physical model for use in manufacturing). CAD models are often (and incorrectly) referred to as
drawings. Since they are still technically 3D even if theyre only stored on a computer, its better to call them 3D models.
Using 3D CAD for product design is not a new thing. The first military applications of CAD/CAM appeared in the 1960s, and
the first commercial product design with CAD started happening in the late 1980s. But it wouldnt be an exaggeration to say
that there is no field of product design which doesnt use some form of CAD for manufacturing. 3D CADs advantages include:
You can view a conceptual design in 3 dimensions, from any angle
Measurements and dimensions of objects can be specified down to insane levels of precision.

Since the piece hasnt been made yet, its possible to modify or
rebuild part or all of it, or visualise it in any colour or material you
like.

What Are Some of the Advantages of

Each Kind of 3D CAD?
This is actually one of the questions I have to answer most often. From
what Ive experienced so far, at the most basic level all the 3D CAD
packages are capable of the same sorts of things (eternity rings, solitaire
wedding rings, etc.). Its only when you get to more advanced types of
design work do the key differences start to stand out. For this reason, I
summarise below certain key design tasks along with the programs
which seem to be the best fit for that particular task.

A Couple of Comments (and Disclaimers)

Before We Begin
All of these are based on my own experiences of each of the software
packages through a combination of testing, demos, tutorial videos,
and working with others who know their tools. Ultimately, these are
opinions, but Ive tried (and will continue to try) my level best to keep
this list as informed and representative as possible.
Besides a comparative rating of level, Ive listed each software
program in alphabetical order. If there are three different programs
in a section labelled Best
Best, theyre of more or less similar strength to
each other in that category.

There is no CAD software out there which is good at

everything. Indeed, in many cases Ive had to recommend users
combine the strengths of two different CAD software packages
together to achieve the complex tasks theyre trying to do. I even
made a separate FAQ page for CAD software combinations.

Examples of 2D CAD (above) and 3D CAD

(below)

Ive tried to keep this list up to date with the latest versions of the
software, but it seems new software comes out every season. If my
list is looking dated, or if a new version of the software has come out which changes how well it performs in various
categories (which does happen), please let me know and Ill take a look and adjust accordingly.
To those people who have been sending me rude or pushy posts- I teach most of these software packages, and I do not
have any vested interest in selling any of these. If you feel Ive missed something in my lists below, Im happy to take
another look and do another demo. But I daresay bullying someone is not the way to change their experiences and
opinions on a piece of software.
For the full disclaimer, see the bottom of this page.

The Comparative Jewellery CAD Software List

Fast Modifications and Reworking of Existing Models
Fastest (either due to parametric history
history,, direct modelling
modelling,, or working with libraries)
libraries): 3Design,
Countersketch, Firestorm CAD
Fast (with limited history features or a quick interface)
interface): JewelCAD, Matrix
Reasonably Quick
Quick: Any of the others

Making a Size Range From a Single Ring

Best
Best: 3Design, Firestorm, Matrix
Good
Good: ArtCAM Jewelsmith, JewelCAD
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: Rhino

Precision Modelling (ie fitted components, hinges, etc.)

Best
Best: Rhino, Matrix
Good
Good: JewelCAD, Moment of Inspiration
Okay
Okay: 3Design, ArtCAM Jewelsmith
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: Geomagic Sculpt, Mudbox, Zbrush

Organic Modelling (ie flowers, vines, scrollwork, filigree, etc.)

Best
Best: 3Design (especially with 3Shaper), Clayoo plug-in for RhinoGold, T-Splines plugin for Rhino and Matrix
Good
Good: Geomagic Sculpt, JewelCAD, Matrix, Moment of Inspiration, Mudbox, Rhino, Zbrush
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: Countersketch

Relief Sculpting (such as coins, medallions, or family crests):

Best
Best: ArtCAM Jewelsmith
Good
Good: Mudbox, ZBrush, Matrix, 3Design
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: Rhino, JewelCAD, Firestorm

Full 3D Carving onto a 3D Surface

Best
Best: Geomagic Sculpt, Mudbox, Zbrush
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: Any of the others

Applying Texture or Inlay With Shapes Onto a 3D Surface

Best
Best: Geomagic Sculpt, Mudbox, Zbrush
Good (due to parametric history): 3Design, Firestorm
Okay: Rhino, Matrix

Creating and Managing Pave Setting

Best
Best: 3Design, Matrix
Good
Good: ArtCAM Jewelsmith, Firestorm, RhinoGold
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: Moment of Inspiration, Rhino
Cannot do it at all
all: Geomagic Sculpt, Mudbox, Zbrush

Rendering Images
Best
Best: 3Design with DeepImage, Firestorm CAD with Keyshot, Matrix, Rhino (with a good rendering plug-in like Brazil,
Keyshot, V-Ray)
Good
Good: 3Design without DeepImage, ArtCAM Jewelsmith with Keyshot, Geomagic Sculpt with Keyshot, JewelCAD,
ZBrush
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: ArtCAM Jewelsmith without Keyshot, Rhino without a rendering plugin

Working in Front of a Client

Best
Best: Countersketch, Firestorm
Very Good
Good: 3Design
Good: Matrix
Can do it, but not really designed for it
it: Rhino, ArtCAM Jewelsmith, JewelCAD

Size of User Base

While nearly all of the above CAD software solutions offer great user support, where that support comes from also
depends on the size of the user base. Generally the wider the user base, the more places you can go to get your
questions answered. However, with small user bases, youre able to get quick answers directly from the developer, and
it also means theyre more likely to listen to your feedback on how to make the software better. So its a trade-off.
Widest User Base (i.e. most people to ask for help, least chance of your feedback being heard): all Adobe
software, Rhino
Big: Matrix, V-Ray plug-in, Zbrush
Fairly Big: 3Design, T-Splines plug-in
Medium: ArtCAM, JewelCAD, Keyshot plug-in, Mudbox, RhinoGold (including Clayoo)
Small
Small:: Geomagic Sculpt, Firestorm
Smallest (i.e. most direct dialogue with developer): Moment of Inspiration

Do You Have Any Examples of What These CAD Programs are Like
to Use?
You have two options if you want to see what most of these software packages are like. The first would be to look at some of
the tutorial videos for each jewellery CAD program. The second would be to ask for a demonstration from any of the sales
representatives of each software packages (contact links below). With a few exceptions, nearly every one of these software
providers has sales representatives keen to show off the features of the software to you.

Where Can I Purchase Them, and How Much Do They Cost?

With the exceptions of Adobe and Rhino, Im afraid you will have to go directly to the software developers to purchase any of
these pieces of software. Fortunately, nearly all of them have sales reps, so theyll be more than happy to help you out. With
regards to costs, they range anywhere from 1200 (for Rhino with a jewellery plug-in and rendering package) to 6000 (For
the full version of ArtCAM Jewelsmith and PowerShape). The problem is these costs change somewhat from country to
country, and also depending on promotions and other factors. Its always best to ask them directly. To this end, Ive provided
links to every single jewellery CAD manufacturers website below:
3D Space Pro (makers of Firestorm CAD, based upon Spaceclaim)
Adobe (makers of Photshop and Illustrator)
Autodesk (makers of Mudbox)
DelCAM (Makers of ArtCAM Jewelsmith, PowerShape, and DelCAM Designer)
Gemvision (makers of Matrix, Countersketch, and Gemvision Design Studio)
JewelCAD
McNeel (makers of Rhino)
Pixologic (makers of Zbrush)
Geomagic (makers of Geomagic Sculpt, formerly known as Claytools), a subsidiary of 3DSystems
VisionNumeric (makers of 3Design and 3Shaper)

Share this:
Share

Related
Frequently Asked Questions Part 5

Frequently Asked Questions 10 3D

Frequently Asked Questions 9 -

But CAD is Taking Away Jobs!

Scanning, Model Conversion, and

Which 3D Printers and Rapid

14 November, 2012

Jewellery CAD

Prototyping Machines Are the Best

In "FAQ"

17 November, 2014

For Making Jewellery?

In "FAQ"

14 August, 2014
In "FAQ"

TAGGED

3Design, ArtCAM Jewelsmith, Claytools, Countersketch, DelCAM Designer, Firestorm, Gemvision, Gemvision

Design Studio, Geomagic Sculpt, JewelCAD, Matrix, McNeel, Moment of Inspiration CAD, Mudbox, Rhino, Student Advice,
Zbrush. BOOKMARK THE PERMALINK.

Now moved over to WordPress

The State of the Art with Real Time Raytracing

90 COMMENTS
J. CHRISTOPHER GURITZ
28 February, 2013 at 4:57 pm
Hi there just thought I would say great comparisons and break downs! Really enjoyed your detail! For items such as
signed rings with relief family crests would you file them also under \Relief Sculpting\ and \
Best: ArtCAM Jewelsmith
Good: Mudbox, ZBrush, Matrix, 3Design
Not really designed for it: Rhino, JewelCAD, Firestorm\
Still in the same order?
Thanks again for your work!
J. Christopher
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
1 March, 2013 at 3:50 pm
Thank you J. Christopher. Ill add the update now.
REPLY

MO
5 July, 2013 at 1:57 pm
Interesting article. I recently went the headquarters of Firestorm for a demo/open house. I was intrigued by the softwate
having sorked with MAtrix for the last year. It seems more intuitive. Is it my imagination or is it a comparable softwarte
to Matrix ? Also looking into Rhino Gold. I took training at GIA and got Matrix for $300 for a year. Good way to start in my
opinion, but now I must buy something in the next few months as the software will not work past a certain date. Thanks

for your time.

REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
6 July, 2013 at 1:42 pm
Dear Mo:
Firestorm and Matrix are both good, but they are also two very different packages. From what Ive seen, Firestorm is
at its best when you are modifying existing files. When it comes to that, it performs in a way few others can (perhaps
Rhino 5s new surface manipulation tools start to approach it, but not to the same extent). Firestorm (especially
newer versions) is also good for making new designs from scratch, but it is not quite as elegant a nuts and bolts
modelling tool as Rhino or Matrix.
RhinoGold is quite good if you all you need is a modest selection of jewellery tools rather than a full compliment of
fine jewellery tools. Matrix, and RhinoGold are all built upon the platform of Rhino 3D CAD software, and they all
have similar workflow up to a point. The big difference comes down more than anything else to how much stone
setting youll reckon youll need to do. If you only do a little bit of pave here and there, then Rhino will work. The
more stone setting or pave youll need, the more youll probably want to consider Rhino Gold at least, if not Matrix.
I hope that helps. If you have any more questions let me know.
REPLY

NEERAJ
1 August, 2013 at 2:41 pm
i am a jeweller i have most of the customers having there designs on snaps or from jewelery books. i am to create
same models which software is best for me as import a snap and do some work on it and to ger a. stl file..
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
4 August, 2013 at 11:52 am
Dear Neeraj:
If you want more specific advice contact me through Holts Academy of Jewellery. Use their online query form.
-J
REPLY

SIMONE
25 September, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Hi, I am currently working in JewelCad, self taught and I just wanted to know if I want to work In Gemvision Matrix, how
difficult will it be compared with JewelCad.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
27 September, 2013 at 9:29 pm
Dear Simone:
I reckon learning Matrix is about the same level of difficulty as JewelCAD. There are more commands, but the
commands and the interface are a bit easier to use generally. Having said that, once you get the core strategy down
in JewelCAD, Ive seen people become astonishingly fast with this software.
Maybe ultimately the tool isnt as important as the user
REPLY

PAUL ROSE
6 November, 2013 at 12:04 pm
Hi Ive purchased Matrix after doing a 4 day training course to assess the software, and am very impressed with it. I
have been asked to teach Jewellery CAD but using 3Design, and want to learn this program also. What a frustrating
exercise. I have downloaded Beginner level tutorials (pdf format) but cannot get them to work, beyond a certain level of
steps. Seems theres key instructions left out. Am happy to send an example to you to see if you can get it to work,
exactly as laid out, as a beginner accessing this for the first time. I believe the program is excellent.
Thanks in advance.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
6 November, 2013 at 10:20 pm
Dear Paul:
Thank you for an interesting testimonial.
I do wonder who was teaching you each piece of respective software, though. In the hands of a competent teacher,
3Design is every bit as easy to learn and use as Matrix. However, both programs can be an absolute beast if youre
trying to learn them all by yourself.
Have you tried my video tutorial for the 3 stone ring in 3Design?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPLyMp-LBG0
If youre based in the UK or passing through, I could even help you face to face with private instruction in either
Matrix or 3Design if you wished.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

M.ADNAN
11 January, 2014 at 12:56 am
hi,i am using matrix 6.3 and i need to know can we convert the stl file into 3dm file?
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
15 January, 2014 at 10:01 am
Hi M. Adnan:
Im afraid turning a mesh back into a .3dm file (also known as unmeshing or reverse engineering) is difficult at
best to do. Most of the tools which are capable of doing this are related to 3D scanning software and the associated
decimation tools. As of right now, I dont know of any reliable tools out there which can do a consistent conversion,
especially on more details or higher quality mesh models. But Ill have a look and let you know if I find any.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

ADNAN
13 April, 2014 at 1:09 am
hi jack
thanks to reply me.i am still waiting.did you find anything to solve this ?
best regards
adnan
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
15 April, 2014 at 10:51 pm
Hi Adnan.
Im afraid I have not. Reverse engineering, mesh to NURBS, and retopology tools only go so far. Search for any
of those terms if you want to see what they can do, but you will probably discover what I have learning these
tools and using them is more work than just remaking the file from scratch.
UPDATE: Since writing this message, Ive written an article about 3D scanning and retropology tools, which
might be helpful for explaining this issue in more depth.
Jack
REPLY

ADNAN
16 April, 2014 at 12:39 am
thanks jack to answer me.do you know any person in pakistan to help me for learning 3design software?
best regards

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
19 April, 2014 at 1:13 am
Dear Adnan.
Im afraid I do not. If youre able to come to London, though, I could help you myself.

Regards,
Jack

ANNIE KOENIG
25 February, 2014 at 6:13 pm
Thanks for such a clear comparison of 3D softwares. Can you tell me more about how ZBrush works?
Currently I am incorporating a lot of textured organic shapes in my jewelry designs. I am using a combination of Rhino,
Rhino Gold and Clayoo.
Ill create the shape in Clayoo and convert it to nurbs. If I apply the texture (using RGs texture tool) it will apply the
texture to one surface of the polysurface.
I want a texture over the entire piece. So I extract the isocurves and network them to a single surface. A tedious process,
and it does what I want.
Ive keep seeing the software ZBrush mentioned with texture, and wish there was a trial version. Is there a better
combination of software, to more efficiently create the organic textured pieces? (I ultimately am creating stl files from
them for print)
Your advice is greatly appreciated!
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
26 February, 2014 at 9:45 pm
Hi Annie:
I gather youve already read my Zbrush page: http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/jewellery-cad-software-zbrush/
Youre right that ZBrush doesnt seem to offer a demo anymore. Im rather surprised by that, because they used to.
Perhaps it might have something to do with their having quite possibly the most awkward user interface ever
developed for 3D CAD software? Indeed, you have to practically trick the software into allowing you to work on 3D
objects!
That being said, its a popular one. While theres no demo of Zbrush anymore, Pixologic do offer Sculptris which is a
free application which gives you a flavour for how the sculpting aspects work.
http://pixologic.com/zbrush/downloadcenter/
As youve correctly observed, the big weakness of all NURBS modelling is the general lack of texturing options. There
are workarounds (such as Rhinos Orient on Surface or Splop commands), and there are plug-ins which help
somewhat (such as Clayoo or T-Splines for organic modelling, or RhinoArt for bas relief flat mesh surfaces), but true
3D texturing is only really available through additional software like Claytools, Mudbox, ArtCAM Jewelsmith, and
Zbrush. Of these Claytools is by far the most elegant interface, as you can literally feel the surface of the 3D CAD
object as they sculpt it! But not everyone has 5000 to spare.
My suggestion: Check out some of the video tutorials, and try out Sculptris.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

BERTRAM EDMONSTON
24 April, 2014 at 1:17 pm
We curently have artcam, my one son is very good on it the other thinks fire storm will be easier to learn he has difficulty
using, learning artcam.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
26 April, 2014 at 9:20 pm
Hi Bertram:
In all honesty, theyre all about the same level of difficulty to learn. It really depends more on what kinds of jewellery
youre hoping to make. ArtCAMs focus is primarily on textural work, relief carving, and 2 1/2D work. This makes it
fantastic for textural designs on rings. However, its not as efficient as other programs with creating complex 3D
shapes and assembled objects (one of the reasons why its bundled with Powershape.)
Firestorm (now called SpacePro3D) is based on SpaceClaim CAD software, which was originally designed for the
express purpose of making it as easy as possible to modify the surface structure of existing 3D models. This makes it
ideal for reworking models in a library. However, the tradeoff of efficiency in modifying models is that its not quite as
efficient at building from scratch as some more basic nuts and bolts CAD modellers.
The best way to get a more informed comparison for yourself is to come up with one or two common designs like
what you like to make, and ask the salespersons from each respective company the same questions. Watch how they
work, and youll get a good comparison of workflow. Every program is different, and different programs suit different
people, regardless of which ones the most efficient way.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

LISA
30 May, 2014 at 3:55 am
Hi. Im new to all of this. We had someone doing some designs for us and is now too busy to meet our deadlines. We just
need fairly simple designs for a bracelet and belt buckle. I am willing to learn a program but am unsure which to pick?
These are not complex pieces. Fairly sime but I know the manufacturer needs them in CAD. Any help is appreciated.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
30 May, 2014 at 8:45 pm
Dear Lisa:
There are some cases where its hard to even know where to begin. Tell you what: if you have images of the kind of
work youd like to do, contact me through Holts Academys website, and then pass on the images to me there. Ill take
a look and see if I cant point you in the right direction.
Regards,
Jack

REPLY

CHETAN
13 June, 2014 at 11:50 am
Hi
Iam a Graphic Designer, I am creating Catalogues for products mainly Jewellery.
I need 3D Software which is easy & fast to create, Final Images should be more Photorealistic. Not intended to
manufacture it.
What Should I buy : Rhino+V-ray or Brasil + Matrix (Expensive), Rhino + RhinoGold + V-Ray or any other combination
please suggest.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
14 June, 2014 at 6:33 pm
Hi Chetan:
My first question would be: have you made jewellery before? Specifically, I mean hand making jewellery at the bench
or using casting. I mention this because a persons knowledge of how the real world process works will make a big
difference for controlling how efficiently and realistically theyll make jewellery. Without knowledge of how jewellery
is made, we dont know the tolerances or thicknesses required of the materials to make the object appear believable
in CAD and rendering.
All of the packages above would work for making CAD jewellery efficiently. The problem is that youre going to need
to know just as much about how jewellery comes out of the casting process as you would about how CAD models are
assembled.
If the answer to that question is yes, then the biggest difference between the choices you listed above is cost. Matrix
is the most expensive, followed by Rhinogold (which I would recommend combining with Brazil since thats what it
was made for), and Rhino with Keyshot, Brazil, or V-Ray would be the cheapest. What you get for that extra cost
though is time saving tools for working with stone settings in fine jewellery. The more time youre going to be
spending on Pave, channel setting, or other types of fine jewellery stone setting, the more I would recommend an
expensive option.
Hope that helps. For other tips in getting started with jewellery (if your answer above was No), FAQ page 2 on my
blog can help:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-part-2-getting-started-in-jewellery-design/
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

CHETAN
16 June, 2014 at 3:56 pm
Hi Jack
Thanks for guidance, I dont have much knowledge of Jewellery manufacturing. Idea is I am getting hand drawn
sketch from Jewellery Designer & I have to convert it in to 3D & Render it to look like actual photographed piece
or some time actual products are there but not very finished one to shoot or my jewellery manufacturing client
already have cad file with them I have to just render it to suit to my printed / web layout requirements.
I dont want to manufacture jewellery from my cad file, manufacturers will take care of it my requirement is it

should look real & fast to create.

I think Rhino + RhinoGold + V-ray (as I heard V-ray has better material & good effects) suitable to me.
By not choosing Matrix am I loosing something in finished superior image ?
Thanks & Regards
Chetan
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
16 June, 2014 at 9:26 pm
Hi Chetan:
Im afraid youre only going to get so far with making jewellery look like a convincing illusion without
understanding more about jewellery tolerances. The problem with working from sketches is that even the
best hand drawn sketches from an experienced jewellery designer havent thought of everything when it
comes to how the ring would actually be made. There is always some information the manufacturers have to
fill in on a given design. Mostly this is because the skills required to create a good jewellery drawing and a
physical ring are very different.
Thinking about it, youd probably have better luck finding a real world physical ring by measuring it with
calipers and modelling that. This might be a way of solving your problem, actually.
As to not choosing Matrix, if youre not seriously pursuing jewellery manufacturing, its probably not going to
make that much of a difference.
Hope that helps.
Jack
REPLY

ARMEN
19 June, 2014 at 10:59 am
Hi,
I found some news and interesting advice here.
Are you aware from Jewelry Animation? What program/software would you advise to use to get ideal and excellent
animation?
Thanks
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
20 June, 2014 at 2:44 pm
Hi Armen:
Im afraid none of the CAD programs made for jewellery or product design are designed for animation. I discuss this
in the FAQ page about how jewellery CAD fits in with other types of CAD and design software:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-jewellery-cad-as-it-fits-in-with-computer-graphics-ingeneral/

The best thing to do if you want proper animation is to design a model in product design CAD, and to import it into a
dedicated animation package.
However, if this is not possible for financial or time reasons, or you dont need that powerful an animation tool, then
some of the more advanced Jewellery CAD software packages are designed to allow some simple animations. 3Design
and Matrix immediately come to mind for having rudimentary animation builders dedicated to this purpose.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

ANTHONY PUGH
29 July, 2014 at 7:56 am
Hi There,
Thanks for the post, its been a real eye opener for me.
I actually come from a photoshop background as a digital retoucher on Mac computers and Im interested in jewellery
design. Ive been playing with Zbrush for a couple of months now and absolutely love it! I can now see the advantages of
having a more bespoke jewellery software for the main structures and shapes along with keeping the typology correct.
Im not particularly interested in stones/diamonds, I guess settings in general.
My question is what would be a good program with all of the above in mind, to accompany Zbrush? I assume I cant avoid
going down the PC route, or can I?
Many thanks in advance
Ant.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
29 July, 2014 at 5:12 pm
Hi Anthony.
No worries. Im glad to help.
While I really enjoy the amazing capabilities of ZBrush too, in my experience it has two big problems which pose
serious obstacles to new users: first, the user interface isnt even remotely intuitive. This makes for a very steep
learning curve, worse than nearly any program Ive ever worked with. Put it this way if you can conquer ZBrush on
your own, you can learn any CAD software I could throw at you.
Second, model conversion in and out of the program can be very awkward, even with the .stl export and decimation
plug-ins. The issue isnt just that you have to bring in meshes for ZBrush to use, but you have to bring in meshes
constructed in a specific way. This means even the cleanest mesh from most product design programs has to be
remeshed once its been imported as a Ztool into ZBrush. This can be highly maddening if youre trying to preserve
crisp lines and clean surfaces. It also makes for very heavy meshes and large .stl files when you finally re-export
again.
With all this in mind, it doesnt terribly matter which 3D product design CAD software or jewellery CAD software you
use for your initial solid form theyre all going to work equally badly with ZBrush. So long as it has a reasonably good
.obj mesh export option, youll be okay. (I believe that would include 3Design, Rhino, Matrix, and 3DSpacePro).
Hope that helps.
Regards,

Jack
REPLY

ANTHONY PUGH
31 July, 2014 at 9:49 am
Thanks Jack,
I appreciate your advice. I went with Rhino for the Mac which is free as it is in development at the moment. It
seems fine so here goes.
Cheers
Ant.
REPLY

JULIE
3 August, 2014 at 10:19 pm
Hello Jack,
I am currently considering the purchase of either Matrix or 3Design.
Regarding your below comment, would you be able to give me an example of how 3Design would be less precise than
Matrix, just so that I can understand this better? (are some things pre-set and unable to be changed?).
Precision Modelling (ie fitted components, hinges, etc.)
Best: Rhino, Matrix
Good: JewelCAD, Moment of Inspiration
Okay: 3Design, ArtCAM Jewelsmith
Can do it, but not really designed for it: Mudbox, Zbrush, Claytools, Countersketch
Thank you in advance.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
4 August, 2014 at 10:35 pm
Hi Julie:
Rhino and Matrix are based upon a classic cartesian grid system, which is well-suited to working in terms of
measurements.
3Design (and several other parametric programs like it), work not based upon a grid system, but rather based upon a
fully parametric history tree system. The advantage of this is that it allows you to make changes to earlier parts of a
model and have later stages automatically update themselves.
What this also means is that youre building objects in relation to each other rather than in relation to precision
measurements themselves. In the case of precision modelling, however, this is not an advantage. You can still do
precision work in 3Design, but the this modelling structure the history tree enforces makes the laying out of complex
assemblies for mechanisms a bit more complicated.
Does that make sense?
In short, the big tradeoff between Matrix and 3Design boils down to parametric history-based modelling. If you
would find it the ability to be able to rework your previously completed models from any stage useful, then 3Design is

definitely worth a look.

Jack
REPLY

VITOR SPADETO VENTURIN

19 August, 2014 at 9:21 pm
Hi.. I pretend create jewels (rings, earrings, etc) What is the best software or the best combination of softwares
(desconsidering de price)?
Best Regards,
Vitor SPadeto Venturin
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
20 August, 2014 at 9:47 pm
Dear Vitor:
Do you mean youre only making images of jewellery? That sounds more like animation.
All of the CAD tools we use for making jewellery for manufacturing are product design CAD. But, as mentioned in one
of my FAQ pages (link below), there are three different types of CAD:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-jewellery-cad-as-it-fits-in-with-computer-graphics-ingeneral/
Im afraid I can only help you a little bit with 3D CAD for animation, and cannot recommend any specific ones. But if
the look of the piece is what you want, and precise dimensions do not matter, I reckon most any animation tool will
do. Perhaps Google Sketchup, Blender, or even 3D Studio Max (if you want to spend some money)?
If you Google search for 3D Animation software, youll come up with some more options.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

LIBERTY
21 August, 2014 at 10:25 am
This is an interesting comparison of different programs. I am an avid user of Jewelsmith, but where it sometimes falls
short is creating full, freeflow 3d designs.
I am looking to create some small figurines in the near future, less than 30mm high. I have looked at Rhino but it is
hardly intuitive to use and seems very drawn out to do easy tasks sometimes, any ideas for a more practical alternative?
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
21 August, 2014 at 9:47 pm
Hi Liberty:
The thing about ArtCAM Jewelsmith is its method of modelling is unlike any other on this list. Technically its a point
cloud relief modeller, so youre building up your layers from a flat surface using colour fields and sculpting tools.
Im afraid most of the efficient ways of modelling in 3D are going to be based upon a more architectural methods of
modelling. Youre right its going to be a learning curve if youre coming from Jewelsmith, but for what its worth,
programs like Rhino work well as opposites to Jewelsmith, allowing you to use the programs together to great
effect.
Have a look at my FAQ page about software combinations favoured by those who work in industry:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-part-4-when-2-cad-tools-are-better-than-1-or-thebest-combinations-of-cad-tools/
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

ASHLEY BELLINO
6 October, 2014 at 2:59 pm
Hi,
I am a self taught jewelry designer. By jewelry designer I have never made my own jewelry but I do create sketches and
scaled drawings which I then have made by my manufacturers for my jewelry business. I am quite proficient in
photoshop and am looking at starting a 3D design course or tutorial on CAD software. What would you recommend given
I dont have hands on jewelry experience? Am I out of my depth? I am living in Shanghai, China.
Thanks
Ashley
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
10 October, 2014 at 5:07 pm
Dear Ashley:
Over the years, Ive found an interesting common thread among all the self-taught jewellers whove come to my
classes. It seems the seldom know how good they really are until they take that first class with other students. But
having the will to learn on your own is a powerful thing, and the fact youve managed to work with a manufacturer
and make a business out of it says quite a lot about your abilities to learn (and how far youve come already).
Before taking a CAD course though, I would make sure youve spent some time working with metal at the bench. It is
important to have a feeling for the materials, as that helps you understand better how to design for those materials.
If I were you, what Id do next before going into CAD would be to find a hand-made jewellery manufacturing course
and take that first. If its not too far away from you, I know someone in Hong Kong I can recommend to you for
training if you wish.
Regards,
Jack

REPLY

GARTH
30 October, 2014 at 6:48 pm
Hi, Thank you for this resource! Were looking at software for the production of high relief award medallions and lapel
pins. Well also be 3D printing models of them for clients to let them look and feel. We were also going to be creating
models for some sports sculptures. I was originally thinking ArtCam but perhaps I should be looking more at a
combination of things? Any suggestions? Art Cam and Rhino? Other? Thanks so much.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
31 October, 2014 at 11:33 am
Hi Garth:
ArtCAM Jewelsmith is definitely up your alley for the medallions and lapel pins, and is probably your best choice for
that task.
As for the 3D models for sports sculptures, you have a couple of options. DelCAM (ArtCAMs developer) makes its
own proprietary 3D surface modeller called Powershape. Its a pretty good program, and DelCAM have been working
to integrate it so that it can communicate back and forth with ArtCAM Jewelsmith. Alternatively, if youre looking for a
larger user base for support and a lower cost program, Rhino also makes a good secondary for ArtCAM. The strengths
of one offset the weaknesses of the other very nicely.
Hope that helps. Give me a shout if you have more questions.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

GARTH
6 November, 2014 at 12:08 am
Thanks for this, Jack. We were thinking of using ArtCAM and Rhino. Ill definitely look at Powershape as well. Is
ZBrush something we should be considering as well for modelling? Also do you know of anything that would help
with setting a photo to 3D? Ive seen the 3Sweep video on Youtube and was ultimately looking for something like
that in a way, where I could take a photo and use that as the basis for creating a model. For example if I had a
photo of a soccer player kicking a ball I could use that as the basis to create a model for one side of it. Taking
photos from the front and back and maybe top and bottom and other side as well, I could stitch them together
and then sort of inflate it to define features? Maybe Im dreaming and that is still years off? I keep thinking of
Terminator 2 and how they modelled the police officer. I was thinking/hoping things have maybe advanced to do
something like that on a smaller scaleThanks again!
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
6 November, 2014 at 11:54 am
Hi Garth:
ZBrush is mainly a tool for taking a 3D object from another piece of CAD software and using texturing and
sculptural techniques directly on it. It can make models on its own, but its a much harder learning curve than

most other programs. I think from where youre starting youre better off with your original ideas.
As for taking photos into 3D, the standard method for doing so is to take several photos into any CAD software
(both Rhino and ArtCAM can do it), and draw lines and interpret 3D shapes tracing over that image in the
background. Even with modern 3D scanning this is still the most efficient way of making a jewellery design at
the moment.
Directly interpreting the shape into a full 3D form for modelling sounds more like 3D scanning, and that can
be done as well, but that would be an entirely different matter. As of right now, 3D scanning can do some of
what youre saying, but the model would have to stand dead still, and youd have to set up a full scanning tent.
It would be a bit like what these guys do:
http://mini-you.co.uk/
Im just finishing up now a new FAQ on 3D scanning and how it fits into jewellery and product design CAD. It
should be up on the blog in a week or two from this posting.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

GARTH
17 November, 2014 at 3:00 pm
Hi Jack,
Thanks for this. Ive been talking with the vendors with your advice in mind and we are moving forward
with the medal and pin end of things. The sculptures still sound a bit out of our depth. Ill be watching
here and looking forward to your coming FAQ. Thanks so much again!
Garth

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
26 November, 2014 at 4:15 pm
Hi Garth:
As promised, Ive written an article about 3D scanning and retropology tools, which might be helpful for
explaining what you want to do in more depth.
Hope it helps, and let me know if you have any more questions.
Regards,
Jack

LESLIE
17 December, 2014 at 6:38 pm
Hi Jack,
I am have been fabricating some precision hollow pieces (think large beads or objects about the size of a kumquat. I am
wanting to experiment with piercing the forms and would like to experiment with creating multiple patterns and 3D
printing them to see them before I move forward to fabricate (time factor). the forms are very geometric in nature
(spheres, lentil shaped forms, tubes, etc.). Can you suggest CAD software that would work best for this? I use a Mac so
something that would work on a Mac would be best. I could use windows (parallels or bootcamp) but am more

comfortable in the mac OS. Thanks!

REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
30 December, 2014 at 5:40 pm
Dear Leslie:
Im afraid there arent that many Mac OS specific CAD software packages, and most of the ones available are mainly
for digital effects/animation. I reckon most CAD programmers assumed engineers worked only on PC. Parallel
partitions and bootcamp OS emulators will allow you to work on a few more options, though.
The size youre planning to work means you may well be able to work just fine with any general product design CAD
software. Any piece of software which is able to export meshes to .stl files will work okay for you. Spaceclaim, Rhino,
and Moment of Inspiration are three possible places to start looking. Each is at a different price point, and as you
might expect you get what you pay for in terms of functionality. But have a look at those and see what you think.
Note that all three of these recommendations Im giving to you are PC software which I am fairly certain can run on
Bootcamp or parallel partitions. Ill have another look at Mac options though and see what I can find, but I dont think
product design CAD software developers have given Mac much time in general.
Hope that helps. Let me know how it goes, and give me a shout if youd like to know more.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

ANNIE
30 December, 2014 at 6:10 pm
Hi LeslieYou might want to check out FormZ. I used it years ago when I worked on a Mac and it was the only solid model CAD
software around for Mac. I just checked out their website and they have a few different levels of versions, including a free
one with no restrictions, that will let you make files for 3D printing.Its http://www.formz.com.
Good luck!
Annie
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
3 January, 2015 at 4:55 pm
Hi Annie:
Youre right. FormZ is a pretty good general purpose CAD program. It doesnt have any jewellery specific functions,
but you can learn to work pretty well without them. Besides, from what Leslie described, jewellery specific functions
wouldnt be particularly necessary.
Thanks for the addition.
Jack
REPLY

SONALI
1 January, 2015 at 12:28 pm
I believe 3DESIGN has a mac version
All your posts have been really interesting Jack and worth reading.
Im a jewellery designer and G.G from India, with 16 years of experience in Manual and Cad design
have working knowledge in 3design, and Rhino
but now a days I dont design myself, I have a team working under me.
Nevertheless, I keep my self abreast with all the happenings in the CAD and CAM area as much as possible, sitting here in
India
Thanks a lot for all the information. Its helps
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
3 January, 2015 at 4:52 pm
Hi Sonali:
Nice to meet you. And thank you for the kind words.
Yes, 3Design definitely has a Mac version. Indeed, I believe it has always had a Mac and PC version, and it once had
even had a Linux version.
The reason why I didnt recommend it for Leslie is because shes working on very large objects which would be more
suitable for general product design CAD than jewellery specific CAD.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

ELISA
13 January, 2015 at 6:13 pm
Hi!
What is your opinion about modeling jewelry on parametric softwares such as Solidworks and Inventor?
Thank you!
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
14 January, 2015 at 5:56 pm
Dear Elisa:
Good question! As a matter of fact, Ive been putting the finishing touches on a new blog entry specifically about
parametric modelling (and Direct modelling) which will be coming out very soon. It seems to me that the subject is
complex enough to warrant its very own FAQ page.

Watch this space!

Regards,
Jack
REPLY

ELISA
15 January, 2015 at 1:06 pm
Thank you very much for your answer! I`m looking forward for the article. Tell us also if you already tried to
model jewelry on these softwares yourself, and what is your opinion in comparison to the traditional jewelry
softwares!
My best regards, have a nice day!
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
16 January, 2015 at 12:04 pm
Hi Elisa:
On the comparison list above, 3Design is a Parametric modelling program, and Firestorm is a Direct modelling
program. The parametric and direct modelling methods within them make changing many aspects of existing
models extremely easy and quick, hence their high ratings in certain categories.
There are a couple of other parametric and direct modelling programs on the market I havent listed here, but
theyre either not really designed for jewellery CAD, or theyre actively hostile to being listed and compared to
other programs (except by their own internal sales reps).
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
7 March, 2015 at 9:40 am
Hi Elisa:
As promised, Ive finally finished the FAQ article on parametric and direct modelling. Here it is:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-11-what-are-parametric-solid-modelling-anddirect-modelling-and-how-do-they-apply-to-jewellery-cad/
Have a read and let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

DAN
20 January, 2015 at 11:07 pm
Hi Jack,
Thanks for providing such detailed information, it is a great help for someone looking to invest in a CAD CAM system. I
work with a lot of small descriptive pieces of jewellery and would like the ability to copy some of these products into a
CAD format to make exact wax moulds. I see you mentioned before that:
As for taking photos into 3D, the standard method for doing so is to take several photos into any CAD software (both
Rhino and ArtCAM can do it), and draw lines and interpret 3D shapes tracing over that image in the background. Even
with modern 3D scanning this is still the most efficient way of making a jewellery design at the moment.
I just wanted to know for small intricate pieces that I would like to make into CAD for designing moulds, would taking
photos of the product or using a scanner be the best method? If its taking a photo, are the products you previously
mentioned (Rhino or Artcam) still the best solutions?
I appreciate your help.
Regards,
Dan
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
22 January, 2015 at 5:36 pm
Hi Dan:
Ill answer your question in a few parts:
First, Ive written a whole FAQ page on 3D scanners, showing the limitations and uses of them. Rather than giving the
full answer here, Ill simply refer you to that: http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-10-3dscanning-model-conversion-jewellery-cad/
Second, its a good question whether its better to work from 2D photos that you trace inside the CAD program, or to
work from freeform just holding the real world imagery/object in your hand. Both methods have followers. I simply
say use whichever suits you or the situation demands.
My suggestions for you would still remain the same for the kind of work you mentioned.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

DAN
22 January, 2015 at 5:45 pm
Hi Jack,
Thanks for getting back to me. Your information helps a lot! I will keep working off the 2D images, as it suits the
product Im trying to replicate the best.
Cheers,
Dan

REPLY

ELISA
9 February, 2015 at 11:58 am
Thank you very much, Jack! Have a nice day!
REPLY

ANNA
24 February, 2015 at 10:36 am
Hi Jack,
Thank you for the comparisons and your very generous answers to all of these questions. I hope you may be able to help
me too! I am a jeweller who trained at art school rather than through the trade. I have picked up lots of skills in my 20
odd years of working at the bench and have developed a range of contemporary precious jewellery incorporating gold
and gemstones. This is only one aspect of my practice and probably takes up about 20% of my time but obviously has the
potential to be the most financially viable. My designs are quite geometric and I dont think I would use close to 10% of
the capabilities of Matrix but I do need to be able to alter ring size, gem size and type of setting in individual designs. I
guess I want to know if an investment in Matrix will be worth it or whether I get rhinogold and work with its limitations?
Is an investment in Matrix going to set me up for the future? I understand youre a CAD specialist, not a psychic but is an
investment in Matrix software and skills going to still be valuable in 10 years time, say.
Thank you in advance.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
28 February, 2015 at 12:15 am
Hi Anna:
Good question. It makes sense to consider buying a tool whose scope matches the kinds of work you do.
I went ahead and had a look at your site. Frankly, I agree with you that your work is too much in the contemporary
arena for you to find fine jewellery plug-ins particularly useful. However, wanting to change the stone sizes and ring
sizes after youve made your designs complicates matters a bit.
Any software can change a ring size faster than you can at the bench. However, for most software you would have to
go back a few steps and basically regenerate parts of the ring to resize the stone settings or the ring shank. The
exception to this would be a subset of CAD modelling tools know as Parametric Modelling (or its cousin Direct CAD
modelling). Rather than storing models as geometry, they store it as stages in a process. You can then go back in and
change earlier stages of the process, and later stages update themselves.
I guess it depends on how important being able to change your designs after youve made them is to you. If being
able to change old designs quickly is your biggest priority, then you should be looking at parametric or direct CAD
software (like 3Design or Firestorm CAD). If reworking old designs is a frequent issue for you, the cost of these is
justified. However, if low cost solutions are your biggest priority, then RhinoGold is as good a solution as any.
I hope that helps. Let me know if you have any more questions.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

ANNA
28 February, 2015 at 6:30 am
Thanks Jack,
I think that Rhinogold is the best option for me. Particularly as the conversion rate at the moment brings the price
up to nearly AUD$9G!
Cheers
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
7 March, 2015 at 9:38 am
Hi Anna:
Following your previous question, Ive done some research and written a FAQ page about parametric and
direct modelling. Have a look if youd like to know more about these:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-11-what-are-parametric-solid-modelling-anddirect-modelling-and-how-do-they-apply-to-jewellery-cad/
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

MILARI BARKER
27 February, 2015 at 1:22 am
Hi,
Thank you very much for your detailed explanation.
However, I would like to know which software you would recommend for 2D Design (using vectors)? This would be good
for me I believe as I am very new to jewellery design and would like an easy interface. I dont design large quantities so I
dont need a fancy software. Just something to give me an idea of what the final product could look like in terms of shape,
dimensions, angles etc.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Didnt know who else to ask for this advice. So happy I found your website.
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
27 February, 2015 at 11:53 pm
Hi Milari:
Youve got a good question there with regards to 2D design software. I may add a section here for this.
However, before I start answering your question, I feel I should manage some expectations. While Photoshop and
Illustrator are often considered gateways to more advanced software, ultimately they have pretty similar learning
curves to some 3D CAD software packages. So rather than picking a 2D software program because its easy, it might
be more worth your while looking for software which will do what you want to do, even if it seems intimidating at
first.
For precision technical 2D work, I would definitely recommend going for Adobe Illustrator any day of the week
because its flexibility for drafting work is unmatched by anything else. Perhaps its only drawback is cost, which is why
I sometimes recommend the free program Inkscape as a good place to start learning 2D vectors before moving up to

Illustrator.
I will admit vectors can be intimidating at first, but once you get the hang of them theyre the building block for all 2D
as well as 3D CAD, and even now I still go back to Illustrator for complex logo work, laser cutting, or blocking out
shapes for relief sculpture.
Does that answer your question?
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

MILARI BARKER
3 March, 2015 at 1:49 am
Yes! Thank you for your time Jack.
Will definitely check out Inkscape and Adobe Illustrator.
Will Adobe Illustrator CC be comprehensive enough to cover all tools for jewellery design? If so, it does seem like the way
to go for the long term.
Do you know a good tutorial for the software?
Kindest,
Milari
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
5 March, 2015 at 5:49 pm
Hi Milari:
For 2D design, Adobe Illustrator CC will be of great help, especially when you combine it with Photoshop. However, If
you wanted to do 3D printing or realising your designs fully in 3D, then you would need 3D CAD (in spite of what
Photoshop likes to claim nowadays).
Check out my tutorials section for a start on Illustrator. Also, if you are close to the London area, I could teach you
Illustrator myself. You can reach me through the Holts Academy website.
Jack
REPLY

GO
26 March, 2015 at 3:22 am
Hi, I am doing Jewellery trading business in Asia.
Most of my production are in China, and mainly they are using JewelCAD for production. Recently, I need to do a better
presentation for my client, therefore I start to think of using Matrix. However, i cannot give up JewelCAD at this stage. Is
possible to convert the file from JewelCAD to Matrix? So that Matrix can only need to support the rendering? Can Matrix
read the data from JewelCAD file, so that it can be saving more time and easier in making Jewellery in Matrix?
Thanks,
Go
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
26 March, 2015 at 10:35 am
Dear Go:
It is indeed possible to convert from JewelCAD to the .3DM file format used in Matrix and Rhino. However, it is not
always easy.
Heres what I used to do:
1.) Export the JewelCAD model as an .IGS file.
2.) Import the .IGS file into Rhino or Matrix.
3.) Youll notice all the .IGS geometry is imported as separate surfaces. Youll need to Join these surfaces back
together again, and in some cases, youll need to use Join Naked Edges on the geometry to get the tolerances of
Matrix/Rhino to cooperate.
Once thats finished, youll have a working editable model in Matrix or Rhino with all the original JewelCAD geometry.
From there you can do what you like with it.
Give it a try, and let me know how it goes.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

GO
10 April, 2015 at 5:00 am
Hi Jack,
Thank you so much for your information.
Yes it helps.
Thanks
Go
REPLY

MANDEE
9 April, 2015 at 7:22 am
Hi Jack!
Thank you so much for this very helpful article! I am a jewelry designer and I just started to learn Artcam. I have created
my vectors in Illustrator. Can you suggest which program would be the easiest and most intuitive for creating cuff
bracelets? Simple 2.5D designs. All the programs seem to have built in libraries for rings but what about cuff bracelets?
Thank you for your help!
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
11 April, 2015 at 6:06 pm
Hi Mandee:
Good question! I love using ArtCAM for 2.5D relief models, especially for rings and bracelets. However, while ArtCAM

Jewelsmith includes ring mandrels for wrapping in its program, it does not to my knowledge as of this writing include
oval cuff bangle mandrels, but I will ask about it.
What we can do in the meantime is one of two things:
1.) We can make the bangle in the flat, 3D print and cast it, and then bend it manually on a mandrel. This would be
the ideal as it guarantees the shape and spring tension we want. However, the bangle may crack if there is too much
porosity in the casting or if the shape is too thin.
2.) You can design the bangle in the flat in ArtCAM Jewelsmith, and then take it into another 3D CAD program like
Rhino and then Bend or Flow the shape along an oval mandrel shape. This would give you the greatest chance of
getting the shape to survive the process, but it does not solve the problem of brittleness of the cast shape, and there
is the small chance the mesh form from ArtCAM itself may not like being bent too far.
Hope that helps. It doesnt hurt to try either technique and see which works best for you.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

MANDEE
12 April, 2015 at 2:38 am
Hi Jack!
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.
following:

Someone on the ARTCAM FORUM suggested the

you can treat your cuff bracelet like a BIG ring. create it the same way, and cut it the same way you do with the
rings.
I have cut some for the company I work for.
Start with a two rail sweep with an oval silhouette that matches your bracelet inside dimensions. Use that as a
ground plane in the same way that a ring uses a cylinder for a ground plane.
Add the same relief as your back relief and when you add the bracelet to the master model, you will end up with
the correct inside shape to your bracelet.
What do you think?
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
13 April, 2015 at 11:42 am
Hi Mandee:
Interesting! I reckon that may work just fine. Ill try it out myself. Thank you for that.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

WIL SCHUEMANN
4 May, 2015 at 6:39 am
I use Pro-E to create solid models. Im modeling an object which is mainly a thin walled tube. I want to add relief(s) in the

form of vines, flowers, faces, lettering, etc. onto the surface of the tube. It seems a waste to buy another solid modeling
package which will likely be less powerful than Pro-E. Is there software which: (1) will input a file exported from Pro-E,
add the surface relief, and then export an STL file; or (2) will input an STL file exported from Pro-E, do the surface relief,
and then export an STL file; or (3) some other idea for modifying a solid model created by Pro-E by adding surface relief
and exporting a STL file.
Thanks for your help,
Wil
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
5 May, 2015 at 9:34 am
Hi Wil:
Good question. While nothing to my knowledge directly interfaces with Pro-E files for textural work, there are a few
textural programs you could use to take exported Pro-E files and add textural features. The issue however will be file
conversion. If memory serves, Pro-E can export .IGS and .STL. Some programs work better with these than others.
ArtCAM Jewelsmith would have no problems with the .STL file (either importing or exporting). Likewise, Geomagic
Sculpt (and the Touch haptic device) have no trouble with .STL files. However, Zbrush and Mudbox dont really like
anything except .OBJ for import.
Therefore, we could find you a file conversion utility if you wanted to use Zbrush or Mudbox. Otherwise, I reckon
Geomagic Sculpt or ArtCAM Jewelsmith are your best bets for textural work exported .STL files.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

SALVADOR
19 May, 2015 at 11:28 pm
Hi. Excellent article. I have been using Modo software for a while and I think it\s a very complete software. Even whent it
is not Jewelry oriented I think you can shape any form very easy. Price is the only concern with this software. Works very
well when exporting to Zbrush since they both work with quads and not triangles. I have seen today a demo of 3Design
as well and I liked it a lot since is a very complete solution. If I would recomend any software I would recommend
3Design & 3Shaper.
REPLY

AKANSHA
24 May, 2015 at 5:57 am
Hello
I have completed my Jewel CAD but later came to as its of no use here and i want to do more in this field and also no
opportunities in Jewel CAD.
What should i do now ?
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
26 May, 2015 at 10:59 pm
Hi Akansha:
If thats the case, then I suppose its time to find new software. Have a look at the list and start making comparisons
to see which one you want to try next.
If cost is an issue, I recommend you read this page from my FAQ section:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-7-how-can-i-afford-5000-of-jewellery-cad-software/
If youd like to talk to other individual users of the various software packages, try the 3D CAD Jewelry Forum.
Best of luck, and give me a shout if you have questions about specific software packages.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

LALIT SONI
28 July, 2015 at 11:07 am
Hello,
I am a cad designer. I use Jewelcad for 3d modeling. Now I have started using rhino for the same.
So I want to edit some of my files in rhino. Is it possible to import my jewelcad files into rhino? Or is their any plugins for
importing .jcd files into rhino?
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
29 July, 2015 at 3:41 pm
Hi Lalit:
It is indeed possible to bring JewelCAD files over into Rhino, although in order to do so, youll have to export your
JewelCAD files as .IGES file format. Also, when you then bring them into Rhino, youll have to rejoin all surfaces. If you
have single-surface cylinders, youll have to join the naked edges where the surface seam should have closed
together.
There arent any plug-ins for doing this mostly because I think this proved to be effective enough for most JewelCAD
users.
I hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

SHANNE
15 August, 2015 at 6:41 pm
This was a great article for me thanks!
I\ve tried to work with a trial of RhinoGold3 2-3 years ago, and since then I\ve wanted to go all the way and bye the
program. But now I\m in doubt if RhinoGold is in fact the best program for my needs.

I want to make organic and asymmetric modelling, different surfaces, both polished and rough ones on parts of the
jewellery (outside of rings etc.), diamond settings, and most of all I want a really good rendering engine.
I had a look at Matrix 8 and also 3Design 9 as very interesting alternatives for RhinoGold. Which would You recommend?
And why does it have to be so difficult to find the pricing of the programs?
Many thanks in advance
/Shanne
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
16 August, 2015 at 10:13 pm
Hi Shanne:
If you already know RhinoGold, then Matrix 8 will be easy for you to learn, as many of the tools are the same or
similar from one to the other.
There are many similar tools in 3Design, but youd be learning a new modelling process.
As to which one is better for you, it really depends on whether you want the advantages of parametric modelling or
not. If you dont know what parametric modelling is, this link will help you:
http://www.cadjewelleryskills.com/frequently-asked-questions-11-what-are-parametric-solid-modelling-and-directmodelling-and-how-do-they-apply-to-jewellery-cad/
In short, if you think youll be having to rework your models frequently, or use parts from one design on another
quite often, then 3Design might be worth the learning curve to change.
Does that help?
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

FURQAN
16 September, 2015 at 9:22 pm
Hi.
Very impressive article.
I have a question if you could please take out time to answer.
I have 3dm files of rings and I would like to be able to change the ring size and centre stone size for different customers.
Is it possible?
The designer tells me that its impossible without creating ring from the beginning because these are solid union files? Or
something along those lines.
Could you shed some light on this please?
Thanks
Furqan
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
17 September, 2015 at 10:58 am
Hi Furqan.
If youre using .3DM Files, this means you most likely made the piece with Rhino or Matrix.
In either program, there is limited capability for using history to change existing objects. However, Boolean
commands (which combine simpler solids into more complicated ones) tend to break history. So Im afraid your
designer is correct when he says that changing the centre stone will involve rebuilding the geometry. However, if he
has the original curves which made it, it should take less time to rebuild the geometry from the original curves than it
took to make the piece the first time around.
As for changing the ring size, however, it will depend on the shape of the band. If it is a solitaire, cluster ring, or
something similar with nothing interesting on the bottom of the band, you might be able to get away with using
Matrix own Ring Resizer tool to readjust the ring size as a mesh. Its not going to be as elegant a solution as remaking
the band, but it should work.
I hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

PANGTCZ
24 October, 2015 at 4:39 pm
Hello
I am a modeler. I use maya and zbrush for scluping model before. If I want to start to learning jewelry CAD , What do you
prefer between RhinoGold or Matrix?
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
27 October, 2015 at 1:57 pm
Hi Pangtcz:
RhinoGold and Matrix are both technically extensions of Rhinos core program designed to make jewellery making
easier. The difference between the two is almost entirely explained by the level of investment. RhinoGold is cheaper
and has fewer options than Matrix.
You could compare Rhino, RhinoGold, and Matrix to a low-end, mid-range, and high-end sports car. You get more
specific performance for your money.
I hope that helps.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

SUSANA
5 January, 2016 at 2:27 pm
Hello,
I found the article to be very useful, but I have a quick question:
Is there any way of having Matrix or 3DESIGN for free on mac? or do I have to buy it? And how could I buy it online?
Thank you so much!
REPLY

CADJEWELLERYSKILLS
7 January, 2016 at 10:18 am
Dear Susana:
Im afraid neither software offers a free demo that Ive ever seen. Some academic institutions offer access to a
student version as part of their diploma courses (Holts Academy and the GIA let students buy a limited time student
version of Matrix, and Ive been informed the Revere Academy lets its course attendees buy a limited time student
version of 3Design).
In other words, you do have to buy it, or use it through open access on a schools campus.
The best (and only) place to buy most CAD software is directly from the software company themselves, or through
one of their closely affiliated resellers. You can find them through the company websites.
Regards,
Jack
REPLY

LEAVE A REPLY
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment

Please Enter Security Code

Name *

Email *

Website

Post Comment
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.

SEARCH

JEWELLERY CAD COURSES

All of my professional CAD jewellery training and diploma courses
are hosted at Holts Academy.
I also offer one-to-one master classes or private
CAD instruction in most major jewellery CAD
software packages.

GET UPDATES
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Email Address
Subscribe

TAGS
2D Design Software and Tools 3D Design Software and Tools 3Design 3D Printing 3d Printing Businesses 3D Scanning Adobe
Augmented Reality CAD CAM in the News CAD Jewellery Design Competitions CAD software Claytools CNC Milling Computer
User Interface Innovations Contemporary Art Jewellery Countersketch Exhibitions Firestorm Further Jewellery Reading
Gemvision Geomagic Sculpt Haptic Modelling Jewellery CAD Software Jewellery CAD Training Jewellery Design Jewellery
Education Resources Jewellery Industry Manufacturing Innovations Materials Research Matrix McNeel New Technology
Trends Online Shopping Photoshop Product Design Rapid Prototyping Rhino RhinoGold Something Beautiful in Jewellery
Student Advice T-Splines Touch Screen User Interfaces Useful Websites For CAD Jewellers wearable technology Zbrush

META
Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
WordPress.org

Jewellery CAD training resources, Jewellery Industry Information, New Technology Trends and Other Discoveries by Jack
Meyer.
All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure all
information provided is accurate as of the date of printing, the owner of this blog can not be held liable for any errors or
omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. Likewise, the owner of this blog cannot make any
representations as to the continued accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link
on this site. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. These
terms and conditions of use are subject to change at any time and without notice.
POWERED BY PARABOLA & WORDPRESS.