Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with early onset
of sexual intercourse. Within an ecological system's conceptual framework,
familial factors associated with early onset of sexual activity were identified
in a sample of 425 adolescents from San Juan metro area schools. Measures
included questions about sexual activity, sexual permissiveness, and such familial variables as: discipline, parental supervision, and parental support. Significant relationships were observed between early onset of sexual intercourse
and parental supervision, discipline, parental support, and parents' marital
status. Results suggest the key role of parents and family in prevention of
HlV-risk behaviors among adolescents in terms of delaying sexual onset. Overall, the study described youths who postponed sexual activity as having greater
support, supervision, and parental involvement.
SEXUAL HEALTH-RISK BEHAVIORS AMONG LATINO/HISPANIC YOUTH
This study was supported by Grant Number 1 R24 MD00152-01, from the
National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health. The contents are solely the responsibility ofthe authors and do
not necessarily represent the official views ofthe National Institutes of Health.
Requests for reprints should be sent to Maria C. Velez-Pastrana, Ph.D.,
Clinical Psychology Ph.D. Program, Carlos Albizu University, San Juan Campus, P.O. Box 9023711, San Juan, PR 00902-3711. E-mail: mvelez@albizu.edu
ADOLESCENCE, Vol. 40, No. 160, Winter 2005
Libra Publishers, Inc., 3089C Clairemont Dr., PMB 383, San Diego, CA 92117
778
781
Family Structure
Family structural and contextual characteristics such as living with
a single parent, having older siblings who are sexually active or pregnant sisters, living in a disorganized or dangerous neighborhood, low
socioeconomic status or being sexually abused can place youths at risk
and infiuence adolescent sexual behavior (Miller, 2002). Living in a
two-parent family household is an important factor associated with
reduction in early onset of sexual activity (Young & Jensen, 1991).
According to these authors, family structure plays a key role in understanding adolescent sexual behavior, where a traditional two-parent
family may be related to less adolescent sexual activity (Young & Jensen, 1991). Hypothetically, both parents provide a more stable environment in which values can be reinforced. Furthermore, they argue that
single-parent families could model nonmarital sexual behavior and
provide less emotional support, which could lead the adolescent to rely
on peers for information about sexual issues and modeling of sexual
behavior. Family structure is an important factor in understanding
early sexual onset in Hispanic/Latino youth.
METHOD
Participants
Four hundred and twenty-five Puerto Rican adolescents ages 12-16
(mean age 13.49) participated in the study. The sample was recruited
from grades 7 to 10 from ten public schools in the San Juan metropolitan area. It consisted of 270 (63.5%) females and 155 (36.5%) males.
With respect to the marital status of the participants' parents, 54%
of the sample came from two-parent households (married or living
together), 41% from separated/divorced parents, and 4.7% from widowers. As to parents' educational level, 57.4%finishedhigh school; 13.5%
hold a technical degree; 21.9% hold a college degree; 7.1% hold a graduate degree, and 15.1% did not finish high school.
Instruments and Measures
Data were collected on a large number of factors associated with
adolescent sexual activity as part of a larger study. A self-report questionnaire to be completed by the adolescent, which included questions
about sexual behavior as well as individual, family, and extrafamial
variables, was developed. It included questions on the following: coping
skills, self-esteem, talents and skills, alcohol, tobacco, and other drug
use, sexual permissiveness, relations with peers, social support, and
family characteristics. Detailed information about the measures of
family characteristics, as well as demographic information relevant to
the present study is provided below.
782
Sociodemographic Data
Basic sociodemographic information including the youth's age, gender, grade, parents' educational level, and parents' marital status was
collected, as well as information about religious iffiliation. Information
about academic achievement (grades, GPA, grades failed) was included
in the data sheet.
Measures of Family Characteristics
Parentdl supervision I monitoring. To assess parental monitoring,
five questions about the type and quality of monitoring/supervision
provided by participeuits' parents were asked. The items are constructed on a 4-point scale that ranges from "never" to "always." A
sample item inquires: "When you're not home, how often do your parents know your whereabouts?" Questions about parental supervision
when the youth is not in school, as well as supervision of the youth's
activities such as the use of the Intemet and video games were included in this section.
Parental support. Ten questions from the Parent-Child Involvement
Scale were used to assess parental support. The 10-item scale assesses
parental support as evidenced by involvement in their children's decision making, problem solving, and shared leisure activities, as reported
by the youth. Smith and Krohn (1995) reported an internal consistency
coefficient of .78 with a Latino/Hispanic sample, while Bravo et al.
(2001) reported a .80 reliability coefficient in a Puerto Rican sample.
Items inquire about how oflen the parents help with homework, listen
to their prohlems, and are availahle to do things together, and were
analyzed as individual items.
Discipline. Eight questions from the Parental Discipline Practices
Scale (MECA/SURF; Goodman et al., 1998) were used to evaluate the
disciplinary practices employed hy the participants' parents. The scale
inquires ahout use of physical and nonphysical forms of punishment,
and is also divided into negative and positive types of disciplinary
measures. Responses range from 1 (never/almost never) to 2 (very often). The reliability coefficients in a Puerto Rican sample for the nonpimitive and physical punishment subscales were .64 and .69,
respectively, as reported by Goodman et al. (1998). Sample items include: "How often do your parents praise you?"; "How often do your
parents ignore you or act cold and indifferent as punishment?"
Family structure. The parent's marital status was used as an indicator of family structure. This question was included in the sociodemographic data sheet.
Sexual Behavior
Items from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000) were administered to measure sex-
783
784
RESULTS
Table 1
Comparison of Sexually Active and Abstinent Adolescents
in Terms of Parental/Familial Characteristics
Item
Parental supervision
Parents know what time
youth gets home
Youth goes home after
school
Parents always know youth's
whereabouts
Parents never know what youth is
doing at home
52.9
69.9
.156*
61.8
81.8
.148*
55.9
76.6
.182**
11.8
1.6
.201**
44.1
17.2
.204***
22.6
Received "a lot" of invitations for adult
content website
40.6
Visited websites with sexual
content
Someone youth met through the Internet 50.0
suggested they meet in person
31.3
Meeting with someone youth met
through the Internet
17.6
All of youth's video games are violent
7.1
.19*
82.2
.31***
27.5
.14*
11.3
.18**
2.8
.25***
Discipline
Parents frequently ignore/act cold or
indifferent as punishment
26.4
10.4
.142*
Parental support
Youth never discusses his/her
problems with parents
26.5
9.0
.17*
32.4
50.3
.18**
Fatnily structure
Parents are married
786
site with adult content, compared to only 17.2% of their abstinent peers
(Cramer's V = .204, p < .001). Significantly more sexually active teens
(22.6% vs. 7.1%) reported that they received "a lot" of invitations to
adult content websites (Cramer's V = .19, p = .026). The majority of
nonactive teens (82.2%) reported not having visited websites with sexual content at all, compared to less than half (40.6%) of their sexually
active peers (Cramer's V = .31, p < .001). Fifty percent of sexually
active teens reported that someone they met through the Internet suggested meeting them in person, compared with ahout a quarter (27.5%)
of nonsexually active peers (Cramer's V = .14, p = .023). Almost one
third (31.3%) of sexually active teens reported meeting someone they
found through the Internet, compared with only 11.3% of abstinent
teens (Cramer's V = .18, p = .007). With respect to the type of video
games they play, a greater percentage (17.6% vs. 2.8% of sexually
active teens reported that all of their video games are violent (Cramer's
V = .25, p < .001).
Discipline. More sexually active teens (26.4% vs. 10.4% of abstinent
teens) reported that their parents frequently ignore them or act cold/
indifferent as a form of punishment (Cramer's V = .142, p = .015).
Parental support. A greater number (26.5%) of sexually active teens
reported that they never discuss their prohlems with their families,
compared to 9% of abstinent teens (Cramer's V = .17, p = .02).
Family structure (parent's marital status). More of sexually abstinent teens (50.3%) reported that their parents are married, compared
to 32.4% of their sexually active peers (Cramer's V = .18, p = .009).
Using discriminant function analysis, a model that discriminates
sexually abstinent vs. active youth was built, incorporating all family
characteristics that were significantly (p < .05) associated with sexual
activity. The model included parentil supervision, discipline, parental
support, and family structure as significant predictors of early sexual
onset. It was significant and classified correctly 79.5% of youth as abstinent or sexually active (Wilks' Lambda = .801, x'' (17) = 49.49, p <
.001). It classified correctly 82% of abstinent teens, compared to 60.7%
of sexually active teens.
DISCUSSION
All family characteristics examined in the present study were significantly associated with early sexual onset in adolescence. These include family characteristics such as parental supervision/monitoring,
discipline, parental support/involvement, and parents' miarital status.
Weak, hut statistically significant (p < .05) correlations (ranging from
.142 to .31, most in the .18 to .25 range) were obtained, and the cluster
787
788
REFERENCES
Bravo, M., Ribera, J., Rubio-Stipec, M., Canino, G., Ramirez, R., F^bregas, L.,
Chdvez, L., Alegria, M., Bauermeister, J. J., & Martinez-Taboas, A.
(2001). Test-retest reliability of the Spanish Version of the Diagnostic
Interview Schedule for Children (DISC-IV). Journal of Abnormal Child
Psychology, 29, 433-444.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology ofthe family as a context for human developoment: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22,
723-742.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 53, 17-19.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). HIV/AIDS. Surveillance
Supplemental Report, 10, 6-24.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2002). Teenage births in the
United States: State trends, 1991-2000, an update. National Vital Statistics Reports, 50(9).
Departamento de Salud de Puerto Rico (2002). Informe de casos confirmados de
SIDA en adolescentes. San Juan, PR: Divisi6n de Epidemiologia, Seccidn
yigilancia de SIDA. [Report of confirmed AIDS cases among adolescents.
San Juan PR: Epidemiology Division, AIDS surveillance section].
Fox, G. L. & Inazu, J. K. (1980). Patterns and outcomes of mother-daughter
communication about sexuality. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 7-29.
789
Goodman, S. H., Hoven, C. W., Cohen, P., Fieldfing, B., Alegria, M., Leaf, P.
J., Kandel, D., Horwitz, S. M., Bravo, M., Moore, R., & Dulcan, M. K.
(1998). Measurement of risk for mental disorders and competence in a
psychiatric epidemiologic community survey: The National Institute of
Mental Health methods for the epidemiology of child and adolescent
mental disorders (MECA) study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 33, 162-173.
Hovell, M., Sipan, C, Blumberg, E., Atkins, C, Hofstetter, C. R., & Kreitner,
S. (1994). Family influences on Latino and Anglo adolescents' sexual
behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 973-986.
Hutchinson, M. K. (2002). The influence of sexual risk communication between
parents and daughters on sexual risk taking. Family Relations, 51,
238-247.
Jaccard, J., Dittus, P. J., & Gordon, V. V. (1998). Parent-adolescent congruency
in reports of adolescent sexual behavior and in communications about
sexual behavior. Child Development, 69(1), 247-261.
Jacobson, K. C, & Crockett, L. J. (2000). Parental monitoring and adolescent
adjustment: An ecological perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 65-97.
Kaberege, N., Modeste, N., Montgomery, S., & Fox, C. A. (2003). Exploring
family factors and sexual behaviors in a group of black and Hispanic
adolescent males. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(1), 63-74.
Longmore, M. A., Manning, W. D., & Giordano, P. C. (2001). Preadolescent
parenting strategies and teens' dating and sexual initiation: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(2), 322-335.
Luster, T., & Small, S. A. (1994). Factors associated with sexual risk-taking
behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56,
622-632.
Lynch, C. 0. (2001). Risk and protective factors associated with adolescent
sexual activity. Adolescent and Family Health, 2, 99-107.
Marsiglia, F. F. (1990). T%e ethnic warriors: Ethnic identity and school achievement as perceived by a selected group of mainland PR students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cleveland: Case Western Reserve
University.
Miller, B. C. (2002). Family influences on adolescent sexual and contraceptive
behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 22-27.
Moore, K. A., Peterson, J. L., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1986). Parental attitudes
and the occurrence of early sexual activity. Journal of Marriage and the
Family, 48, 777-782.
O'SulUivan, L. F., Jaramillo, B., Moreau, D., & Meyer-Bahlburg, H. (1999).
Mother-daughter communication about sexuality in a clinical sample
of Hispanic adolescent girls. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,
21(4), 447-469.
Perkins, D. F., Luster, T., Villaruel, F. A., & Small, S. (1998). An ecological,
risk-factor examination of adolescents' sexual activity in 3 ethnic groups.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 660-673.
Puerto Rico Department of Education (1997). Encuesta de Conductas de Riesgo
en Adolescentes de 9no a 12mo Grado de las Escuelas Publicas de Puerto
Rico. Programa de Salud Escolar. [Survey of risk behaviors in adolescents in 9th to 12th grades in Puerto Rico public schools. Program of
school health.] San Juan, PR.
Ramirez, J., Zimmerman, M. A., Newcomb, M. D. (1998). Sexual risk behavior
among youth: Modeling the influence of prosocial activities and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 237-253.
790
Romero, A. J., Robinson, T. N., Haydel, K. F., Mendoza, F., & Killen, J. D.
(2004). Associations among familism, language preference and education
in Mexican-American mothers and their children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 34-40.
Small, S., & Luster, T. (1994). Adolescent sexual activity: An ecological, riskfactor approach. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 181-191.
Smith, C, Krohn, M. D. (1995). Delinquency and family life among male adolescents: The role of ethinicity. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 24,
69-93.
Taris, T. W., & Semin, G. R. (1998). How mothers' parenting styles affect
their children's sexual efficacy and experience. The Journal of Genetic
Psychology, 159(1), 68-82.
Upchurch, D. M., Anesthensel, C. S., Sucoff, C. A., & Levy-Storms, L. (1999).
Neighborhood and family contexts of adolescent sexual activity. Journal
of Marriage and the Family, 61(4), 920-934.
Valenzuela, A., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Familism and social capital in the
academic achievement of Mexican origin and Anglo adolescents. Social
Science Quarterly, 15, 18-36.
Wilson, H. W., & Donenberg, G. (2004). Quality of parent communication about
sex and its relationship to risky sexual behavior among youth in psychiatric care: A pilot study. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry &
Allied Disciplines, 45, 387-395.
Young, E. W., & Jensen, L. C. (1991). The effects of family structure on the
sexual behavior of adolescents. Adolescence, 26(104), 977-987.
791