Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AMSTERDAM
S H A K E D O W N INVESTIGATIONS ON PARTIAL P E N E T R A T I O N
WELDED NOZZLES IN A SPHERICAL SHELL
E. P R O C T E R a n d R. F. F L I N D E R S
i. INTRODUCTION
A p r e v i o u s p a p e r [1] d e s c r i b e s , i n s o m e d e tail, the reasons underlying this experimental
w o r k . It i s s t a t e d t h a t t h e o v e r a l l r e q u i r e m e n t
of t h e t e s t p r o g r a m m e i s to p r o v i d e e x p e r i m e n t a l
i n f o r m a t i o n f o r two m a i n r e a s o n s :
1. V e r i f i c a t i o n of t h e o r e t i c a l s o l u t i o n s .
2. P r e d i c t i o n of t h e b e h a v i o u r of t y p i c a l c o m ponents which cannot at present be theoretically a n a l y s e d , a s s i s t i n g b o t h d e s i g n e r s of f u t u r e
p l a n t a n d o p e r a t o r s of e x i s t i n g p l a n t .
One suggested design concept, which has res u l t e d f r o m t h e o r e t i c a l s t u d i e s , i s t h a t of s h a k e down. T h i s s u g g e s t s t h a t s t r u c t u r e s c o n t a i n i n g
discontinuities such as nozzle attachments, can
be repeatedly pressurized beyond first yield without y i e l d i n g c o n t i n u i n g i n d e f i n i t e l y . In t h e o r y , t h e
s h a k e d o w n s t a t e i s a c h i e v e d w h e n on d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n , a s e t of r e s i d u a l s t r e s s e s a r e s e t up w i t h in t h e s t r u c t u r e s u c h t h a t , on a l l s u b s e q u e n t c y c l e s , t h e s t r u c t u r e w i l l b e h a v e in a p u r e l y e l a s t i c
manner.
A r m s t r o n g a n d F r e d e r i c k [2] h a v e p o i n t e d out
t h a t in i d e a l c a s e s ( s p e c i f i e d g e o m e t r i e s a n d
f o r m s of l o a d i n g a n d a s s u m i n g e l a s t i c - p e r f e c t l y
plastic materials behaviour) shakedown will occ u r on t h e f i r s t l o a d c y c l e a t l o a d s up to t w i c e
t h o s e to c a u s e f i r s t y i e l d . L e c k i e [3], L e c k i e a n d
172
Forged B a r to
BS1503(1958)-161-B
0.22%
0.21%
Si
0.2%
0.233%
0.02%
0.038%
0.024%
0.028%
Mn
0.78%
0.72%
Ni
0.1%
Cr
0.08%
Mo
0.01%
Cu
0.12%
YP
17.7 tsi
17.17 tsi
31.4 t s i
31.9 tsi
UTS
Elongation
24% on 8 in.
gauge length
Reduction
of A r e a
4...3
|
liar
-,
~'~'~
~J~J
~ i "0"196
0,01441
35% on 4 A
61%
s c a l e p r a c t i c e . P a r t i c u l a r a t t e n t i o n w a s p a i d to
t h e h a r d n e s s a n d w i d t h of h e a t a f f e c t e d z o n e s a n d
t h e h a r d n e s s of d e p o s i t e d w e l d m a t e r i a l .
2"875"DIA. .~
2.2. Manufaclure
T h e n o z z l e s w e r e p o s i t i o n e d in t h e v e s s e l
such that there was negligible elastic stress interference between them. Nozzle sections are
s h o w n in f i g s . 1-3.
Fig. 1 s h o w s t h e t h i c k e s t p a i r of n o z z l e s
f i t t e d in t h e v e s s e l . T h e s e a r e n o m i n a l l y t r u e
to s c a l e of r e a c t o r v e s s e l s t a n d p i p e n o z z l e s d e s i g n e d to BS 1500, in w h i c h d e s i g n a l l r e i n f o r c e ment for the opening in the shell plate is provided
by t h e n o z z l e . Fig. 2 s h o w s n o z z l e s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e of r e a c t o r v e s s e l s t a n d p i p e a t t a c h m e n t s , d e s i g n e d to BS 1500, b u t w h e r e t h e w h o l e of t h e
u p p e r p a r t of t h e v e s s e l i s m a d e in t h i c k e r p l a t e
t h a n r e q u i r e d by n o r m a l m e m b r a n e s t r e s s c a l c u l a t i o n s , i.e. p a r t r e i n f o r c e m e n t f o r t h e o p e n i n g s
i s p r o v i d e d by the n o z z l e a n d p a r t by the u s e of
t h i c k e r s h e l l p l a t e . Fig. 3 s h o w s t h e f i n a l p a i r
of n o z z l e s . It w a s d e s i r e d to d e s i g n t h e s e on a
p u r e p r e s s u r e s t r e n g t h b a s i s , i.e. n o z z l e t h i c k n e s s 0.035 in. O w i n g to o b v i o u s w e l d i n g p r o b l e m s
t h e n o z z l e s w e r e m a d e ~zn. t h i c k . T h e r a d i a l
n o z z l e i s s l i g h t l y t h i c k e r t h a n t h a t r e q u i r e d by
DS 3915 ( t = 0.07 in.) a n d t h e o b l i q u e n o z z l e
s l i g h t l y t h i n n e r (BS 3915, l = 0.21 in.).
Care was taken before and during manufacture
to e n s u r e t h a t t o l e r a n c e s w o u l d b e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e ,
a t t h i s s c a l e , of r e a c t o r p r a c t i c e . T h e d e v e l o p m e n t t e s t s i n d i c a t e d t h a t t h e a n g l e s of t h e o b l i q u e
1
SHAKEDOWN INVESTIGATIONS
i 2s~'
175
NOZZLE. 2.
"~
V"
VJ
NOZZLE 3
,,,
%,
. ~
o
. o.o,,~,
320 ~
NOZZLE 5.
~T m 0"217
~D( ~ 0"0148
; ~
~ i ~ O'il4
~./~l
//
NOZZLE a
- O.H
blO| -- 0"0i48
I~
0 04]4
t/T
3. INSTRUMENTATION
Full d e t a i l s of the i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n and p o s i t i o n s
of the s t r a i n gauges a r e p r o v i d e d in the p r e v i o u s
paper.
The s t r a i n gauges used w e r e Budd type HE 121,
having ~ in. gauge length and 120 ohm n o m in a l
resistance. Laboratory tests demonstrated these
gauges to be s a t i s f a c t o r y for m e a s u r i n g s t r a i n s
up to at l e a s t 7~o when used with Budd type GA 5
adhesive.
174
CREEP18HRS, /
& 8 CYCLES~/
09
f
PROOFTEST
~/
/
0.8
0"7
,';'LO,
DESIGN.
/--
(~)
O-16%
22%
0-6
(i)
CYCLESTO"SHAKEDOWN"AND
05
04
0-3
02
O.I
[
OO5
I .........
OI
J____
O'15
% STRAIN
[
0"2
. . . . .
0.2.5
0!3
i.e. o n e 50 p s i i n c r e m e n t b e y o n d m e m b r a n e
pressure.
yield
5. R E S U L T S
T h e b e h a v i o u r of e a c h n o z z l e a t t h e e s t i m a t e d
f i r s t y i e l d p o s i t i o n d u e to p r e s s u r e c y c l i n g i s
s h o w n i n f i g s . 4 - 9 . T h e s e a r e p l o t s of hoop
s t r a i n , w h i c h i s t h e m a x i m u m p r i n c i p a l s t r a i n in
each case, against the ratio
test pressure
membrane yield pressure
At e a c h p r e s s u r e i n c r e m e n t , t h e n u m b e r of c y c l e s
to a c h i e v e a s h a k e d o w n c o n d i t i o n i s s h o w n , a s i s
t h e w i d t h of t h e h y s t e r e s i s loop a s a p e r c e n t a g e of
175
SHAKEDOWN INVESTIGATIONS
I'O
CREEP
18 HRS,
8 CYCLES~
AND
0'9
TEST
0-8
~
O'8 %
0"7
/
//
O'6 I-
~ 0 . 8
--
I-0
l/
is.r
////
0.7
/~
//
9uJ
0'5
//
Y-
()
,//
CYCLES T O *SHAKEDOWN"
L O O P WIDTH
o/o
YIELD STRAIN
i.O%
//
uJ
:r
AND
0"4
h
/t
//
/i
/I
//
0"3
js~Y l ~
/
l/
#
//
//
"r R
o.i
~/T"
O'29
~T--
86
/
!
i/
- 0'05
g i,
I
O.OS
I
0.1
I
O.IS
I
0.2
I
0.25
0.3
0"4
e/o STRAIN
s u r e s in e x c e s s of the shakedown l i m i t , p r e s s u r e
c y c l e s of 0-600 psig w e r e applied a f t e r the 750
psig test. Fig. 10 shows the s t r a i n b eh av i o u r at
the f i r s t y i e l d i n g position in the thin oblique
nozzle. This is typical of al l the other c a s e s .
6. DISCUSSION
176
E. PROCTER
and R. F. FLINDERS
CYCLES
NO
SHAKEDOWN,
9-
-PROOF
TEST
3-
7-DESIGN
CYCLES
TO
LOOP
YIELD
0 6%
SHAKEDOWN
WIDTH
STRAIN
P
o,
a
6-
5-
IST YIELD
S.F.=
2-15
(EQUIVALENT)
$-
l-
>_
I
005
I
01
I
0 15
%
the pressure
range increases.
At any one pressure, however, the loop width remains nominally
constant from the first cycle. Also, the width of
loop appears to a certain extent to be independent
of strain magnitude and strain range. For instance,
the plots for the thin and medium oblique nozzles
(figs. 8 and 9) show nominally the same strain
magnitude and range, at approximately
twice first
yield pressure
in each case, while the loop widths
are grossly different.
This is probably connected
with the size of the plastic zones and the restraint
provided by the surrounding
elastic material.
The hysteresis
loops do not prevent the determination of a shakedown condition. As previously
described,
shakedown was considered to have oc-
0.2
0.25
03
0.1,
/,
86
I
0.35
I
04
STRAIN
SHAKEDOWN INVESTIGATIONS
I.o--
177
NO SHAKEDOWN77
~
8 CYCLES~ / / /
CREEP18HRS.~+ ~ y
(~
0"9--
+-"
i.s /o
PROOF TEST
0'8--
I-2 o~
(~)C YCLES TO
SHAKELooP
WIDTHDOWNAND
0"46 /o YIELD STRAIN
0"7-- -
0-46
DESIGN
0"34 lo-~'~,~
0'6--
/
0'5--
IS!YIELD
SC_JE2.16
(EQUIVALENT)
," / / /
4,//~//
~//
0-4--
///
0,3--
///
0"2
R
~,/tE
*'/T
~/T
"
0"24
0"6
86
0-I
//
I
0.05
O'1
O.15
0"2
% STRAIN
I
0"25
I
0"3
I
0"35
I
0"4
o.I
O-2
03
04
o. :" 0 5
0"6
O '
0'8
O"9
tO
L-
0'05
/,
"/
//
"/
I!ffYIELD
S.C.F."2"S6
[EQUIVALENT]
DESIGN
//
PROOF TEST
OI
/,
///
//
/"
////
//f
/
4//
///
O'15
//
/.."
4"
//
//"
//r
~/
i%
/,2
/ //
Fig.
0"2
//
//
///
8.
/ '/
7/ / '
/ /
/ /
/
/, / /
2'3%
//
/ ,
/
//"
//
,/i/
/
/
//
medium
O'35
iT YIELD
/ / /" /
?.1%
% STRAIN
//
behaviour,
03
l/
///
//
/ /
/ /
/ /
Shakedown
0"25
/,
/
,/ /,
// /
/,'
2.6%
=029
oblique
0.4
R = B6
T
nozzle.
0-45
0"5
=o2,0
/5//
2'3/
//
/'7
//
11"4%
o.55
8 CYCLES
NO SHAKEDOWN
0.6
065
0
0
E/]
CJ
bl
Ii
--
O'1
0"2
0"3
o-,
O S
DESIGN
PROOF TEST
I/
O" I
0"O5
_ _ _ _ lit'YiELD
S.C,E = 2"78 [EQUIVALENT]
0'6 --
0.7 -
0-8
09
I'O
/
O'15
/
I___~
//
O/o
0"25
/7
//
/7
//
/7
/7
/7
//
02
//
//
0"3
///
//
/+///
STRAIN
/z
//
I
O3S
O. II
04
.-8
T =
2.9%
~x
~?~:
0202,
i it YIELD
~/"
,z
//"
./7
//
,7
"
<9
0.920/0
2.9%
6.70/0
045
W,OT,
O5
YIELD STRAIN
,oop
8 CYCLES
/
NO SHAKEDOWN
'
055
"
p.a
-..]
.O
m
r~
in
O.I
O-;
0-3
O',~
O-S
O'~
0"7
0'8
O.j
I.O
I~1"YIELD
-DESIGN
0"1
I /
PROOF TEST
I
/
02
Ii
I
If
0-3
o 4
o.s
/o
STRAIN
0.6
/
ov
//
J
0"8
0"9
SHAKEDOWN AT
FIRST CYCLE.
[ l ' g x l ~t YIELD P R E S S U R E / / /
t0
C R.EEP
oo
o
SHAKEDOWN INVESTIGATIONS
until membrane yield pressure is approached.
The most probable explanation for this behaviour
is that the strain gauges were not attached at the
true first yielding positions. Since the axial positioning was correct it was considered that the
nozzles were not located symmetrically in the
openings in the shell plate, resulting in small
s t r e s s g r a d i e n t s a r o u n d t h e n o z z l e s . To d e m o n strate this, strain gauges were attached around
t h e i n n e r c i r c u m f e r e n c e of e a c h r a d i a l n o z z l e in
a second test vessel which is being prepared for
creep testing. Strains were recorded during a
preliminary pressure test at ambient temperature. Variations in circumferential strain were
d e t e c t e d up to t h e o r d e r of 4~0. S i m i l a r b e h a v i o u r
w a s i n d i c a t e d by n u m e r o u s g a u g e s , in a n d l o c a l
to a l l t h e n o z z l e s , t h a t w e r e o b v i o u s l y n o t f i x e d
at first yield positions.
6.2. Comparisons with theory
6.2.1. Plastic analysis
A r m s t r o n g a n d F r e d e r i c k [2] h a v e d e m o n s t r a t e d t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of t h e V-on M i s e s y i e l d c r i t e r i o n to t h e s h a k e d o w n t h e o r e m . T h e y s h o w e d t h a t
provided plastic collapse does not occur first, the
shakedown limit will be twice first yield pressure
s o l o n g a s t h e r a t i o s of t h e m a x i m u m p r i n c i p a l
s t r e s s e s a n d t h e i r d i r e c t i o n s r e m a i n c o n s t a n t . If
the stress ratio changes, the shakedown limit will
b e l o w e r , but c a n b e c a l c u l a t e d . F o r a b i a x i a l
stress system, i.e., when the third principal
s t r e s s i s z e r o , c h a n g e s in t h e s t r e s s r a t i o s c a n
b e e x p r e s s e d a s a n g u l a r r o t a t i o n of t h e s t r e s s
v e c t o r on t h e V-on M i s e s e l l i p s e a n d if e l a s t i c
perfectly plastic materials behaviour can be considered, the shakedown limit is simply demonstrated.
In t h e c a s e of t h e n o z z l e / s h e l l i n t e r s e c t i o n s ,
geometrical symmetry ensures that the directions
of p r i n c i p a l s t r e s s e s do n o t c h a n g e . T h u s , if t h e
plastic stresses can be calculated the shakedown
limits can be confirmed.
Stresses have been calculated, from the experi m e n t a l l y r e c o r d e d s t r a i n s , by t h e m e t h o d s h o w n
i n A p p e n d i x I [6]. It w a s a s s u m e d t h a t a n y r e s i d u a l s t r e s s e s d u e to w e l d i n g w e r e r e d u c e d to z e r o
during stress relief. Also, elastic perfectly plastic materials behaviour was assumed: this is a
good a p p r o x i m a t i o n s i n c e t h e s t r e s s s t r a i n c u r v e s
for both the shell plate and nozzle material are
t y p i c a l of t h o s e f o r low c a r b o n s t e e l s , r e a c h i n g
0.8Yo to 1'~o p l a s t i c s t r a i n b e f o r e s t r a i n h a r d e n i n g
commences, which is greater than any recorded
strains at the maximum shakedown conditions.
On d e p r e s s u r i z a t i o n t h e s t r a i n h y s t e r e s i s w a s
ignored, perfectly elastic strain behaviour being
assumed.
181
O"H
STRESS A T MAXIMUM\
51"IAKEDOWN PRESSURE
~--'~'~,,~
tNITIAL LOADING
TO FIRST yIELD
-, o
i b--
%
%
AT ZERO PRESSURE
182
SHAKEDOWN INVESTIGATIONS
t a i n e d b e c a u s e of t h e c h o i c e of p a r a m e t e r s for
c a l c u l a t i n g t h e r e s i d u a l s t r e s s e s w h i c h o c c u r on
depressurisation.
It i s a s s u m e d t h a t f i r s t y i e l d
o c c u r s in t h e s h e l l p l a t e , a d j a c e n t to t h e n o z z l e .
T h e m e m b r a n e s t r e s s e s a r e s u b t r a c t e d f r o m the
calculated peak stresses, leaving the local inc r e a s e of s t r e s s d u e to e d g e f o r c e s c r e a t e d by
t h e r e s t r a i n t of t h e n o z z l e . It is t h e n p o s t u l a t e d
t h a t t h e r e s i d u a l s t r e s s e s a r e d u e e n t i r e l y to
e q u a l but o p p o s i t e e d g e f o r c e s . T h e e f f e c t s of t h e
elastic shell plate material surrounding the enlarged plastic zone is ignored.
W h i l e a p u r e l y e l a s t i c a n a l y s i s of t h i s t y p e i s
v e r y a t t r a c t i v e , b e c a u s e of i t s c o m p a r a t i v e s i m p l i c i t y , i t s v a l u e i s o b v i o u s l y l i m i t e d by v i r t u e of
t h e a s s u m p t i o n s w h i c h h a v e to b e m a d e , to r e t a i n
the more simple analysis methods.
In p r a c t i c e , v e s s e l s a r e p r o o f t e s t e d b e f o r e
b e i n g put i n t o s e r v i c e . In t h e c a s e of v e s s e l s d e s i g n e d to BS 3915 the p r o o f t e s t p r e s s u r e is n o m i n a l l y 1.25 t i m e s d e s i g n p r e s s u r e . If d e s i g n s a r e
to be b a s e d on s h a k e d o w n c o n s i d e r a t i o n s , t h e
m a x i m u m a d v a n t a g e i s to be g a i n e d if t h e v e s s e l s
a r e a l l o w e d to o p e r a t e a t p r e s s u r e s a p p r o a c h i n g
the m a x i m u m s h a k e d o w n p r e s s u r e v a l u e . In s u c h
c a s e s , p r o o f t e s t p r e s s u r e would e x c e e d m a x i mum shakedown value and normal shakedown beh a v i o u r w o u l d h a v e to o c c u r on t h e s u b s e q u e n t
o p e r a t i o n a l c y c l e s . Fig. 10 i n d i c a t e s b e h a v i o u r
t y p i c a l of a l l t h e g a u g e s a t p e a k s t r a i n p o s i t i o n s
in t h e t e s t v e s s e l . T h e ' p r o o f t e s t ' p r e s s u r e in
this case was approximately 7/8 membrane yield
p r e s s u r e . A s s h o w n in t h e g r a p h , a p p r e c i a b l e
c r e e p o c c u r r e d at t h i s p r e s s u r e . H o w e v e r , on
s u b s e q u e n t p r e s s u r e c y c l e s to 1.9 t i m e s t h e f i r s t
yield pressure a shakedown condition was
a c h i e v e d on t h e f i r s t c y c l e .
6.4. P r a c l i c a l implicalio~ls
Research at the Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories
is l e a d i n g to d e s i g n m e t h o d s , for p r e s s u r e r e t a i n ing s t r u c t u r e s , b a s e d on:
a) R e s t r i c t e d d i s t o r t i o n a t p r o o f t e s t p r e s s u r e ,
as a safeguard against plastic collapse.
b) T h e e s t a b l i s h m e n t of s h a k e d o w n c o n d i t i o n s
at operating pressures.
So f a r a s a n a l y t i c a l d e s i g n m e t h o d s a r e c o n c e r n e d
t h e r e a r e two p o s s i b l e a p p r o a c h e s ; s i m p l i f i e d
t h e o r i e s c a n be a p p l i e d s e p a r a t e l y to d e t e r m i n e
collapse pressures (limit analysis) and shakedown
pressures,
o r , fully c o m p r e h e n s i v e p l a s t i c a n a l y s i s c a n b e u s e d to c o v e r b o t h a s p e c t s . W h a t ever methods are chosen, ideal materials behav-
SHAKEDOWN INVESTIGATIONS
iour is a s s u m e d , i.e. the s t r e s s s t r a i n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s a r e c o n s i d e r e d as being e l a s t i c p e r f e c t l y
p l a s t i c and B a u s c h i n g e r effect, cyclic h y s t e r e s i s
and c r e e p e f f e c t s a r e ignored.
The a s s u m e d m a t e r i a l s b e h a v i o u r does not a p p e a r to i m p o s e p a r t i c u l a r l y s e v e r e r e s t r i c t i o n s
on the a n a l y s i s of mild s t e e l s t r u c t u r e s for use
at a m b i e n t t e m p e r a t u r e s . As shown by the p r e s s u r e s t r a i n plots in figs. 5-9 the peak s t r a i n s at
0.88 m e m b r a n e y i el d p r e s s u r e a r e all l e s s than
1.0 ~ and s t r a i n h ar d e n in g is g e n e r a l l y not e x h i bited by these m a t e r i a l s until s t r a i n s of this o r d e r
of magnitude a r e r e a c h e d . F o r mild s t e e l s at e l e vated t e m p e r a t u r e s and low alloy and s t a i n l e s s
s t e e l s , which exhibit s t r a i n h a r d e n in g i m m e d i a t e ly beyond yield, the c o l l a p s e a n a l y s i s m e t h o d s
will be m o r e s e v e r e l y r e s t r i c t e d than those for
shakedown. This is b e c a u s e c o l l a p s e is r e l a t e d
to absolute s t r a i n l e v e l s , w h e r e a s shakedown
a n a l y s i s is r e l a t e d to p r i n c i p a l s t r a i n r a t i o s o r ,
in the m o r e s i m p l i f i e d m e t h o d s , to purely e l a s t i c
a n a l y s i s . Obviously, t h e r e is much to be gained
if it can be d e m o n s t r a t e d that component b e h a v iour can be r e l a t e d to type and d i m e n s i o n a l p r o p o r t i o n s within the type group, allowing d e s i g n s
to be based on s i m p l e e l a s t i c a n a l y s i s m e th o d s
as used at p r e s e n t , i.e. by r e s t r i c t i n g the e l a s t i c
s t r e s s c o n c e n t r a t i o n f a c t o r s to a safe m a x i m u m .
In the case of the p r e s e n t study of n o z z l e s in
s p h e r i c a l s h e l l s , the e x p e r i m e n t a l r e s u l t s in d i cate this a p p r o a c h to be r e a l i s t i c .
Fo r the p u r p o s e of this d i s c u s s i o n it is a s sume d that m e m b r a n e d e s i g n s t r e s s is 2 /3 unia xi a l yield s t r e s s and p r o o f test p r e s s u r e will be
1.25 t i m e s the design p r e s s u r e . Thus design
p r e s s u r e and p r o o f t e s t p r e s s u r e will be 0.66 and
0.833 t i m e s m e m b r a n e y ie ld p r e s s u r e r e s p e c t i v e l y .
In the t e s t s , e x c e s s i v e d i s t o r t i o n only o c c u r r e d
at p r e s s u r e s in e x c e s s of 0.833 t i m e s that to m e m br a ne yield. The f i r s t indication of s t r a i n b e h a v iour which could be likened to p l a s t i c c o l l a p s e ,
was the t i m e dependent c r e e p , which o c c u r r e d at
0.88 t i m e s m e m b r a n e y ie ld p r e s s u r e . This was
d e t e c t e d on and local to all the n o z z l e s at this
s a m e p r e s s u r e . Thus, although the c r e e p s t r a i n
r a t e s w e r e r e l a t e d to SCF, the onset of c r e e p was
not. T h i s m e a n s that c o l l a p s e a n a l y s i s is not r e quired for n o z z l e s of this type and s i z e group.
For p r a c t i c a l p u r p o s e s shakedown o c c u r s at
all p r e s s u r e s up to twice f i r s t y ie ld v a l u e . (This
disc o u n t s the c a s e s w h e r e the S C F ' s a r e so low
that " c o l l a p s e " o c c u r s f i r s t and, consequently,
a r e of no i m p o r t a n c e so far as design is concerned. ) Thus design can be continued on an e l a s tic b a s i s , by simply r e s t r i c t i n g the e l a s t i c S C F
to a safe m a x i m u m . It has been shown that proof
183
7. CONCLUSIONS
The design of mild s t e e l p r e s s u r e v e s s e l c o m ponents, o p e r a t i n g below the c r e e p r a n g e , can be
based on the e s t a b l i s h m e n t of shakedown at d e sign p r e s s u r e t o g e t h e r with the av o i d an ce of p l a s tic c o l l a p s e at p r o o f t e s t p r e s s u r e .
So far as shakedown is c o n c e r n e d , it has been
shown that if p l a s t i c s t r e s s e s o c c u r r i n g at f i r s t
184
E. P R O C T E R and R. F. F L I N D E R S
[ ( r / R ) ~ f R / T < 0.24] ,
the shakedown l i m i t was shown to be n o m in a l ly
twice f i r s t y i el d p r e s s u r e . Since shakedown has
to be e s t a b l i s h e d at design p r e s s u r e , e l a s t i c
design methods can be maintained by r e s t r i c t i n g
the m a x i m u m e l a s t i c S C F ' s a c c o r d i n g l y . Where
the shakedown l i m i t is twice f i r s t y i e l d p r e s s u r e
and m e m b r a n e design s t r e s s for the s t r u c t u r e is
2/3 yield, then a l i m it of 2.8 on the m a x i m u m
e l a s t i c S C F will include an adequate safety m a r gin to c o v e r design and m a n u f a c t u r i n g contingencies. This m a x i m u m S C F m u s t be based on the
t r u e equivalent s t r e s s at the f i r s t y ie ld positions.
Also, within this s i z e r a n g e , c o l l a p s e p r e s s u r e s
a r e in e x c e s s of any p r e s s u r e that v e s s e l s will
e x p e r i e n c e during s e r v i c e , thus shakedown will
be the sole design c o n s i d e r a t i o n .
For l a r g e r n o z z l e s than those t e s t e d , it may
be that the shakedown l i m i t b e c o m e s l e s s than
twice f i r s t y i el d p r e s s u r e . Also, it may be that
p l a s t i c c o l l a p s e takes o v e r as the m a j o r d e s i g n
limitation. W h i c h e v e r is the case it will be p o s sibel to r e l a t e the b e h a v io u r to e l a s t i c SCF,
thus maintaining s i m p l e design methods. To in v e s t i g a t e t h es e a s p e c t s , t e s t s on c y l i n d e r , cylinder i n t e r s e c t i o n s a r e in p r o g r e s s at the B e r ke l ey N u c l e a r L a b o r a t o r i e s .
The work also r e q u i r e s extending to include
simimr investigations on strain hardening materials. To this end it is hoped to test a low alloy
vessel and further, to carry out similar work on
vessels made from austenitic materials.
= Young's modulus
= Poisson's ratio
= yield stress
aX
= stress in X direction
(ry
= stress in Y direction
a'XM
= mean d e v i a t o r i c X s t r e s s
a'yM
= mean d e v i a t o r i c Y s t r e s s
a' X
a'y
da X
= i n c r e m e n t of s t r e s s in X d i r e c t i o n
day
= i n c r e m e n t of s t r e s s in Y d i r e c t i o n
de X
= i n c r e m e n t of s t r a i n in X d i r e c t i o n
dey
= i n c r e m e n t of s t r a i n in Y d i r e c t i o n
dgp
= i n c r e m e n t in equivalent p l a s t i c s t r a i n
dex
dey-
_ 3 a'XM
1
v
2 ~
d~-p +-~ da X - ~ d a y ,
(1)
3 a'YM d~-p +
day
da X
2 ~
E
--~
,
(2)
(3)
(4)
In the limit equation (4) is correct but for finite increments in load this equation will not
yield accurate results.
An accurate solution of eqs. (i), (2) and (3)
can be obtained by repeating their solution and
by "up-dating" after each solution until a defined
degree of accuracy is obtained. In detail these
equations would then take the form:
3 a'XM
1
v
~ dJp + ~ daX - ~ d a y ,
dex- 2
(5)
SHAKEDOWN INVESTIGATIONS
3 Cr'yM dgp + 1 d(~y /) dffx
de y = 2 ~
-E
- -E
(6)
185
(7)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This paper is published by p e r m i s s i o n of the
Central E l e c t r i c i t y G e n e r a t i n g Board.
RE F E R E N C E S
Eq. (7) is c o r r e c t for finite i n c r e m e n t s in s t r e s s .
For the f i r s t solution of any load step d~X and d~y
a r e zero and for subsequent solutions they take
the values last calculated.
Once the post yield s t r e s s e s have been obtained the calculation of shakedown f a c t o r s is a
s t r a i g h t forward g e o m e t r i c calculation based on
the a s s u m p t i o n that unloading takes place e l a s t i cally (see example in fig. 11).