Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Innovation
in the Power Systems
industry
Engineers and specialists worldwide exchange
information and state-of-the-art world practices
to enhance knowledge related to power systems
in CIGREs latest publication.
Dear readers,
with SIL (surge impedance loading), a subject which
is attracting increasing interest in recent years as designers and system planners are exploring the option
to increase the transfer capacity of transmission lines.
This is especially important for long distance interconnections, where increased SIL of the lines can reduce or even remove restrictions on power flow.
page
Editorial
Reliable Controllable Reactive Power for the Extra High Voltage System By High Voltage
Distributed Energy Resources
14
30
40
46
56
63
List of figures
Figure 1: Section of th modelled PMSG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Figure 2: Magnetic flux density comparison between no modular rotor (a) and modular rotor with 4 magnets/module (b),
5 magnets/module (c) and 8 magnet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Figure 3: Comparison of magnetic flux density measured at rotor yoke between no modular rotor and modular rotor
with 4 magnets/module (a) and between no modular rotor and modular rotor with 4 magnets/module (b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Figure 4: Comparison of magnetic flux density measured at gap between no modular rotor and modular rotor with
4 magnets/module (a) and between no modular rotor and modular rotor with 4 magnets/module (b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Figure 5: Comparison between induced voltage obtained for non-modular and rotor modular with different number of magnets per module.. . 10
Figure 6: Cogging torque in non-modular rotor (a) and comparison with modular rotor configurations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Figure 7: Comparison of voltage (a), current (b) and power (c) obtained for the no modular rotor machine and modular
rotor with 16 magnets per module. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Figure 1: Sketch of HV DER Q Provision for DSO-operated HV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 2: Sketch of HV DER Q Provision for TSO-Operated HV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 3: Research Topics Related To CQ Provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 4: Schematic Representation of the EHV/HV System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 5: DER PQ Capability Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 6: Reactive Power Provision on Network Area Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 7: Bandwidth of Controllable Reactive Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 8: Factors Determining Reactive Power Bandwidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure 9: Expected Advantage from Optimizing EHV/HV Taps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
16
17
18
18
19
19
19
20
21
21
22
22
22
23
23
23
24
25
25
26
31
31
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
38
38
41
42
44
44
45
Figure A.2: Predicted maximum Aeolian vibration antinode amplitude (0-peak) as a function of frequency when the same tensile
load is applied on the subconductors and a constant low wind turbulence is considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.3: Predicted maximum strain (0-peak) on the bundle conductors at the suspension clamp
and at the spacer clamp as a function of frequency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.4: Maximum strains at the suspension clamp with the Diana model : when the same tensile load is applied to the subconductors
of the bundle and a constant turbulence (It < 0.07) is considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.5: Maximum strains at suspension clamp with Claren-Cosmai model : when the same tensile load is applied to the subconductors
of the bundle and a constant turbulence (It = 0.05) is considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.6: Maximum strains with Krispin model : when the same tensile load is applied to the subconductors
of the bundle and a constant, low, wind turbulence is considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.7 Cosmai hypothesis for variable wind turbulence index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.8: Maximum strains at suspension clamp with the Claren-Cosmai model : tension differential neglected and variable
turbulence (0.20 < It < 0.05) considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.9 Maximum strains at suspension clamp with the Diana model : tension differential 1D
and constant turbulence (It < 0.07) considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure A.10: Maximum strains at suspension clamp with Diana model : tension differential 10 D
and constant turbulence (It < 0.07) considered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
54
Figure B.1: Drag coefficient on windward rough cylinder as function of speed/Reynolds number from Wind tunnel experimental tests [8] . . . .
Figure B.2: Rough cylinders energy with respect to x/D amplitude for the three considered frequencies: experimental numerical
comparison. Due to the model scale, f = 0.5 Hz corresponds to f = 1 Hz full scale is both the static and dynamic bundle rotation angle with
respect to the wind. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure B.3: Test set-up showing towers, conductors and anemometers of the test line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure B.4: IREQ Measurements: Maximum peak to peak horizontal oscillations as function of mean wind speed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Figure B.5: Benchmark results: Maximum peak to peak horizontal oscillations as a function of mean wind speed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diagram: Schematic representation of a Transmission Line in electric systems studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
57
57
60
60
61
63
Figure 1: Racket Tower; the drawings distances and heights are in meters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Figure 2: Cross-Rope Tower (Chainette) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Figure 3: VX-Asymmetrical Tower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Figure 4: VX-Symmetrical Tower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Figure 5: Cat Face Tower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Figure 6: Monopole tower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Figure 7: Electric superficial gradients in 500kV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Figure 8: Graphic with the audible noise profiles (AN) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Figure 9: Graphic with radio interference profiles (RI) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Figure 10: Graphic with the electric field profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Figure 11: Graphic with the magnetic field profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
List of tables
Table I: Input data for the analytical iterative procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table II: Output data from the analytical iterative procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Table III: Rotor modularity options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table IV:Torque period due to modules of the rotor.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Table I: Voltage limits observed by OPF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table II: Simulated Scenarios and Strategie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Table III: Abbreviations used in (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Table I: Voltage Control use case - Information Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table II: Voltage Control use case - Control Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table III: Security scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table IV: Voltage Control - security standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
32
33
35
37
Table I: Analytical Methods and Assumptions Used in the Study (Numerical table entries refer to supporting references) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table II: Experimental tests characteristics and system configuration data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table III: spacer-damper data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table IV: wind power input and conductor self-damping for the analytical-analytical benchmark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table B.1:Subspan oscillation test case data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
47
49
50
50
59
Table I: Minimum, Maximum and Average values of electric field on conductors surface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Table II: Positive and Zero Sequence parameters of 500kV TLs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Abstract
Permanent magnet direct drive configurations have
considerable advantages in offshore wind farms improving
reliability, longevity and lower maintenance by eliminating
gearboxes and external excitation systems. The size of the
multipole permanent magnet machine, necessary for direct
drive applications, exceeds manufacturing and transport
allowed limits. Thus, new machine concepts based on
modular design are needed.
This paper presents the study of the influence of rotor
modularity on the behaviour of a radial flux permanent
magnet synchronous generator with surface mounted
magnets and fractional slot windings. The electromagnetic
study is based on the finite element method and the solutions
has been obtained by using the software tool FLUX 2D.
The starting point of this study is a machine of 40 pole
pairs, 84 slots and an outer radius of 3.206m. The study
takes into account the number of modules and the number
of permanent magnet in each rotor module.
1. Introduction
Development of offshore wind power requires the design
of high power wind turbines to allow better use of the wind
resource at such locations.
To select the wind turbine topology, it is necessary to
consider two key factors: the ratio torque/cost and the ratio
torque/mass. The torque/cost factor is essentially economic
and the goal is to try to increase this rate to the extent possible
in order to obtain values of kW/ as low as possible. The
torque/mass ratio is critical in applications where weight
and size of the generator are design constraints. Typical
large wind turbines use horizontal axis configuration with
*mcomech@fcirce.es
KEYWORDS
Direct-drive wind turbine, Finite element analysis, Modular rotor, Permanent-magnet synchronous generator
Cigre Sc
32
Rotor radius
4.00%
Gap
0.300%
0.35
250%
10
r.p.m
Rotor material
Steel M24
Stator material
Steel M24
Conductor material
Cu
PM material
N30
1.5
Parameter
Value
Units
Rated Power
2400
kW
Rated Voltage
2.019
kV
Rated Current
710.974
Eficiency
0.983
Frequency
6.667
Hz
PM length
29.25
mm
144
Slot number
84
Stack length
1800
mm
Stator diameter
6412
mm
6058.4
mm
5906
mm
mm
29.2
mm
Gap
Magnet height
Value
Units
2400
kW
1.32
kV
Number of phases
Pole pairs
40
Modules
20
16
10
16
Figure 3. Comparison of magnetic flux density measured at rotor yoke between no modular rotor and modular rotor
with 4 magnets/module (a) and between no modular rotor and modular rotor with 4 magnets/module (b).
Figure 4. Comparison of magnetic flux density measured at gap between no modular rotor and modular rotor with
4 magnets/module (a) and between no modular rotor and modular rotor with 4 magnets/module (b).
Figure 5. Comparison between induced voltage obtained for non-modular and rotor modular with different number of magnets per module.
(1)
where LCM(nslots, npoles) is the least common multiple of the
Figure 6. Cogging torque in non-modular rotor (a) and comparison with modular rotor configurations.
10
Modules
LCM
(nslots, nmodules)
Period
(degrees)
20
420
0.857
16
336
1.071
10
420
0.857
420
0.857
Figure 7. Comparison of voltage (a), current (b) and power (c) obtained for the no modular rotor machine and modular rotor with 16 magnets per module.
11
4. Conclusion
Biographies
Teresa Arlaban Gabeiras received the M.Sc. degree in
Industrial Engineer in 2007 and she has since then been
working as an engineer in the ACCIONA Windpower
R&D Department. Currently, she is the Head of the
Research and Patents area. She has been involved in
various wind research projects dealing mainly with grid
integration issues, power curve improvements, load
mitigation strategies and drive train analysis. She is
the co-author of more than 10 papers for international
conferences and the co-author of more than 20 patent
applications related to control of wind turbines for
grid integration and load mitigation, transport and
installation systems, generation concepts and offshore
applications
References
[1] H. Fink, F. Devaux, B. Dolata, C. Perrier, New and innovative
Smart J. Ribrant and L. M. Bertling, Survey of Failures in Wind
Power Systems With Focus on Swedish Wind Power Plants During
12
13
Abstract
The topic of providing controllable reactive power (CQ)
to the next-higher voltage level based on controlling
distributed energy resources (DER) has recently received
increasing attention. From a theoretical perspective, the
use case of deferring or avoiding Extra High Voltage
(EHV) investment in compensating equipment by the
ancillary service provision of controllable reactive power
from High Voltage (HV) to EHV would seem within
future reach in certain cases. Despite the comparatively
higher losses related to HV DER controllable reactive
power provision, the use case is shown to be potentially
economically attractive under certain circumstances.
However, a considerable number of practical barriers
exist that are presented in a systematic way based on a
decision flowchart. Simulation results are based on a
close-to-real German EHV/HV system and measured
data. They highlight the benefit resulting from optimized
dispatch of both EHV/HV tap changer and HV DER
providing CQ.
1. Introduction
1.1. Motivation
The paper at hand focuses on reactive power exchange
at the interface of high voltage and extra high voltage
systems. Typically, the Transmission System Operator
(TSO) has among others - the task to ensure adequate
availability and dispatch of controllable reactive power
(CQ). He will compensate both for the residual of vertical
* erika.kaempf@uni-kassel.de
KEYWORDS
Ancillary Services, Compensating Equipment, Distributed Energy Resources, Reactive Power Provision
14
15
16
17
(iii)
By combining different types of resources, e.g.
fossil fuelled industry generators and DER in a costminimal and reliable way.
18
3. Methodology
3.1. Definition of Reactive Power Bandwidth
HV network areas are galvanically coupled regions that
mostly have two or more connection points with EHV.
Reactive power exchange is here studied on a network
area basis: The residual of reactive power exchange at all
network area EHV/HV connection points Figure 6 is computed once for the base case depicted in cyan
in Figure 7 - and once for the optimized case, depicted
in brown in Figure 7. The difference between the two
is the achievable bandwidth of controllable overexcited
reactive power, indicated by green arrows. In this
contribution, only overexcited CQ is analyzed, therefore
the term overexcited is usually omitted when referring
to the bandwidth in the following. The term reactive
flexibility is used as synonym to the term bandwidth
here. The consumer oriented counting system is applied
throughout this contribution.
19
Minimize:
Cost (t) = CostHVLineloss (t) + Cost EHVHVTrfLoss (t) (1)
subject to
QEHVHVetwArea (t)
QFlexox,min
20
1.100 p.u.
0.982 p.u.
5. Simulation Results
Table II provides an overview of the scenarios and control
strategies whose results are discussed in the following.
Strategy
Scenario
Base Case:
EHV/HV Taps
EHV/HV
EHV/HV Taps Control Variable in
Taps Voltage Voltage Con- OPF(Optimized),
Controlled & trolled (Local) together with HV
DER Q = 0
DER Q
HV Wind
Measured
HV Wind
Strong
21
22
23
5.5. Summary
SpCQCScen i =
Term
SpCQC
CCtr,Scen i _CBase,Scen i
(2)
Unit
Explanation
Scenario i:
i=1: HV wind as measured
i=2: HV wind strong
Ctr j
Controlled Case j:
j=1: DER Optimized., EHV/HV Tap Voltage
Controlled (Local)
j=2: DER + EHV/HV Tap Optimized
Base
Base Case:
DER Q = 0, EHV/HV Tap Voltage Controlled (Local)
QNA
Mvar
Scen i
6. Economic attractiveness of
highly dependable controllable
reactive power from HV
24
25
26
27
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Acknowledgment
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
28
29
Abstract
HV
ICT
IED
IP
LV
MMS
MV
MVGC
OLTC
P
Q
RES
SAS
SCADA
SGAM
SGIS
SNMP
TLS
TSO
V
VC
1. Introduction
The connection of distributed generation impacts the status
of the power grid such that new grid control functions need
to consider not only the classical parameters, but take inputs
also from new sources. This implies that additional ICT
networks used by new actors for exchanging information
flows with utility SCADA networks must be considered. The
resulting overall architecture interconnects a variety of ICT
entities and network segments, either owned or managed
also by third parties. In this new scenario the analysis of the
cyber security aspects of smart grid control infrastructures
deserves special attention. The paper illustrates how
the architecture aspects of both the power grid and the
information infrastructures highly influence the outcome
Nomenclature:
DER
DMS
DoS
DSO
EMS
High Voltage
Information and Communication Technology
Intelligent Electronic Device
Internet Protocol
Low Voltage
Manufacturing Message Specification
Medium Voltage
Medium Voltage Grid Controller
On Load Tap Changer
Active power
Reactive power
Renewable Energy Sources
Substation Automation System
Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition
Smart Grid Architecture Model
Smart Grid Information Security
Simple Network Management Protocol
Transport Layer Security
Transmission System Operator
Voltage
Voltage Control
* Giovanna.Dondossola@rse-web.it
Index Terms:
Cyber Risks, Security Requirements, Security Standards, Smart Grids, Voltage Control Communications.
30
31
Information Exchanged
Description
Grid Topologies
Information regarding the characteristics of the grid elements (substations, loads, generators and
lines). Configuration changes of the controlled grid (grid topology reconfigurations, new DER/
load installations)
Weather Forecasts
TSO Signals
Signals influencing the execution of the voltage control algorithm (e.g. changing optimization
criteria or overriding commands): Voltage setting, Reactive Power setting, Automatic Voltage
Regulator inclusion/exclusion
Generation Forecasts
Active power production plan on an hour base for a time horizon of 36 hours (36 values of active
power). Generation coefficient 0<C<1
Load Forecasts
The future load is predicted on the basis of reference loads (seasonal patterns), stochastic fluctuations, active demand effects, weather forecast, calendar day. Load coefficient 0<C<1
Energy/Ancillary costs
Costs for the modulation of active and reactive power and reward schemes
Load/DER Features
DER Measurements
Q +/-; V +/-
V +/-
P +/-; Q +/-
32
Step Name
Primary Actor
Triggering Event
Pre-Condition
Post-Condition
Generation
forecast
Periodically
Information acquisition
DMS
Periodically /
Asynchronous
DMS
Periodically /
Asynchronous
Periodically
MVGC
Periodically
Execution of control
voltage algorithm
MVGC
Set Setpoints
SAS / MVGC
New setpoint
33
34
Parameter
Description
Attack Target
DER interfaces,
substation2DER interfaces,
substation2center interfaces,
center2substation interfaces
Attack effect
Attack extension
# DER networks
# substation networks
# center networks
Data frequency
Periodic / Asynchronous
4. Risk analysis
According to the SGIS risk analysis process [1] the evaluation
of the risk levels of a given smart grid use case goes through
the application of the impact and threat likelihood analysis
to the scenarios of the use case information assets in the
35
36
5. Security standards
Standard Type
Standard Reference
IEC 62351Part 8
IEC 62351Part 9
XML security
IEC 62351Part 11
TLS
IPSEC
SNMP
https
ssh
37
Figure 13: Voltage Control use case - mapping of IEC 62351 series
6. Conclusions
From the analysis of the security aspects of the voltage
control communications in active medium voltage grids the
paper described how the ICT architecture, the benchmark
grid data and the security space are involved in the impact
and threat likelihood evaluations. Through the application
of the SGIS risk analysis method, the paper showed the
advantages and the limits of a qualitative approach to the
complex task of evaluating and treating cyber risks of the
smart grid applications. Finally the paper clarified the
38
link between the outcome of the use case risk analysis and
the security requirements/measures from available and
ongoing security standards.
7. Acknowledgment
9. Biographies
8. References
[1] CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Smart Grid Coordination Group Smart
Grid Information Security, Technical Report of the Smart Grid
Information Security Working Group, Dec. 2012. [Online].
Available: ftp://ftp.cen.eu/EN/EuropeanStandardization/HotTopics /
SmartGrids/Security.pdf
39
Abstract
Energy storage is an attractive solution to achieve a more
environmentally-friendly energy mix while maintaining
the safety of electricity supply. In this article, a control
algorithm for energy storage systems management is
proposed. It relies on a control law that interfaces a power
plant, the electric grid and a storage system. Designed
for producers, this law enables the generation of a
profit by selling a greater part of the production when
market prices are high. From a grid perspective, this
allows a better match between production and demand
by providing a greater amount of power during peakhours. The law was designed to be applicable to a broad
range of scenarios, while being simple enough to quickly
optimize the equipment and its size. In order to illustrate
the control law operation, a case composed of a wind
power plant and an energy storage system constituted of
batteries and flywheels is considered.
1. Introduction
Driven by the European Union, the liberalization of the
electricity market has begun based on the directives 96/92
[1] and 2003/54 [2]. Since July 1st 2007 the electricity
market in France has been opened to competition by
integrating free-price offers [3]. More recently, the
European commission has released a communication
report presenting the major future orientations for the
grid [4]. The progressive cessation of an advantageous
rate for Renewable Energy (RE) purchase is advised. The
objective is to suppress national support as technology
becomes mature enough, i.e. a gradual exposition of RE
to the market price. The final objective of this incentive
is a reduction of the cost for consumers. The problem of
RE integration, which is an issue of grid stability, must
be solved by a better match between demand and supply.
As regards production, the commission proposes the
installation of back-up thermal units, shared at European
level, in order to compensate for the irregularity of RE
*mancini-guillaume@laposte.net
KEYWORDS
Control law, Energy storage system, Optimization, Renewable Energy
40
2. System Description
Lead-acid Batteries
The Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VLRA) technology
with a gel electrolyte has been retained for the lead-acid
batteries. Indeed, this technology shows a longer lifetime and a greater capacity than the Absorbent Glass
Mat (AGM) [13]. Even though this battery is not the best
battery available in terms of performance, it is mature
and relatively cheap [14]. The simulation was performed
using deep cycle gel batteries from Victron energy (ref
BAT412201100).
Flywheels
Flywheels are constituted of a spinning disc that stores
the energy mechanically. Recently, flywheel technology
has greatly improved and the most recent flywheels are
constituted of a composite disc that can rotate up to
100,000 RPM. In order to reduce the drag losses, the disc
levitates above a permanent magnet in a low-pressure
environment. An electric motor-generator is used to
convert electric energy to mechanical energy by applying
a torque on the disc.
41
42
5. References
[1]
EuropeanParliament,Directive96/92/ecoftheEuropeanParliament
and of the Council concerning common rules for the internal
market in electricity, Available online at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/
legal-content/en/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31996L0092, 1996.
[2]
[3]
4. Conclusion
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
43
Fig. 3: Flywheel simulation model. Modelling of saturation phenomena is not shown to enhance
the figure clarity. Adapted from [21].
[13] Victron Energy Blue Power, GEL and AGM batteries, Available
online at: http://www.victronenergy.com/upload/documents/
Datasheet-GEL-and-AGM-Batteries-EN.pdf , 2014.
[15] G. Roe, Boing flywheel energy storage technology, tech. rep., Boing
Research and Technology, 2012.
[16] R. Pena-Alzola, R. Sebastian, J. Quesada, and A. Colmenar,
Review of flywheel based energy system, in Proceedings of the
2011 International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and
Electrical Drives, (Torremolinos, Spain), May 2011.
Fig. 4: Battery model used to simulate charge and discharge cycles. Based on [22].
44
Fig. 5: Evolution of according to time for flywheels (blue) and batteries (red).
Biography
Pierre-Alexandre Levy is an engineer student at INSA
Lyon, France. He worked at Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory on Homogeneous Charge Compression
Ignition (HCCI) combustion for small generators in
2014. For his end-of-study internship, he is employed by
Schneider Electric for automation and regulation in the
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) field.
He will received the Dipl.-Ing. degree from the Energy
and Environmental Department of INSA Lyon in 2015.
45
Members:
Jennifer Havel, Jason Huang, Julien Garnier, Sergey Kolosov, Jean Philippe Paradis, Andr Leblond ,
Chuck Rawlins, Umberto Cosmai, Pierre Van Dyke, Jean-Louis Lilien, Wolfgang Troppauer,
Alessandra Manenti , Laura Mazzola, E. Ruggeri, Naji Sahlani, Douglas Proctor, Ccile Roz,
Marta Landeira, Sergio Thaddey, Claude Hardy, Ronald Tong, Bin Liu, A.Bhangor, A Vinogradov,
T.Furtado, M.Araujo.
1. Introduction
46
Krispin Model
The computational model determines vibration modes
of the conductor bundle [11]. For that purpose, the
subconductors are assumed to behave like strings with
small bending stiffness. The subconductors are divided
into subspans at the locations, where spacers are attached.
The spacers are represented by an impedance matrix which
describes the relation between the conductor forces and
velocity at the spacer clamps. Stockbridge dampers are
treated analogously.
Formulating the equation of motions of the subspans
and taking into account boundary conditions (clamped
span ends) and compatibility conditions at the spacer
clamps, leads to a set of homogeneous equations. Solving
Analytical Methods
Diana et al
Krispin
Cosmai (Claren)
Case data
AA+AE B.
Table II
Table II
Table II
Spacer Characteristics
AA+AE B.
Table III
Table III
Table III
AA B.
Curve b Table
IV [8]
AE B.
Table IV [7][8]
[11], [13]
YES [7][8]
NO
AA B.
Table IV
Table IV
AE B.
[10]
[11], [13]
[10]
Calculation Method
[10]
[11], [13]
[10]
Approach
Matrix transfer
method.
Modal approach
Complex Eigenmodes
0.5 EJmax
0.5 EJmax
0.5 EJmax
Consider Turbulence
Self-Damping Data
AA B.
No
No
AE B.
Yes
Yes
No
Single Freq
Single Freq
Single Freq
Spacer Model
[10]
[11], [12]
[10]
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Table I - Analytical Methods and Assumptions Used in the Study (Numerical table entries refer to supporting references)
Note: AA B. stands for Analytical-Analytical Benchmark, while AE B. stands for Analytical-Experimental Benchmark.
47
This model [8] [10] is the same as the Diana model, using
the same software.
However during the years some changes have been
introduced in the formulation of the energy dissipated by
the conductors and of the energy introduced by the wind.
Diana Model:
In this model, eigen frequencies and eigenmodes of
the system (real modes) are computed through the
matrix transfer method. Field matrices [Bi] (i=1,..,N
with N=number of subspans) defining the relationship
between displacements and forces on the conductors at the
extremities of each subspan and point matrices [Pj] (j=1,
.,N-1) defining the relationship between displacement
and forces on the conductors right side and left side of
each spacer are defined. The product of all the field and
point matrices, gives a matrix [A] defining the relationship
between displacements and forces at the span extremities.
End conditions allow for the computation of the eigen
frequencies and correspondent eigen modes [7,8,9,10]
3. Benchmarks
In this section the results obtained for two different
benchmarks are summarised: the first one is an analyticalanalytical benchmark, i.e. the amplitudes and strains
predicted by the various available models applied to a certain
test case are compared; the second one is an analyticalexperimental benchmark: in this case strains predicted by
analysis are compared to strains actually measured in a field
test in Pakistan. The experimental data were available to the
benchmark participants since the beginning. In table II the
main information concerning the considered experimental
tests are reported, while table III summarises the spacer
data The input data of tables II and III are used by both the
benchmarks.
48
449
Terrain condition
494
Number of circuits
Phase configuration
Phase conductor
Type and name
ACSR Drake
28.14
1.628
139060
32000
Stranding
Spacer damper
Number
37 63 55 68 61 69 59 - 37
use the same functions for wind power and conductor selfdamping as shown in Table IV; it is then easier, from the
results, to highlight the structural differences in the models.
The Claren-Cosmai model is not considered for this type
of benchmark, because it should provide exactly the same
results as the Diana model.
The predicted maximum vibration amplitudes for each
mode of vibration are reported in figure A.2 - as a function
of frequency - for the Diana and Krispin model. The
predicted maximum strains are reported in figure A.3.
In both the cases the same tensile load is applied on
the conductors of the bundle and a constant low wind
turbulence is imposed, according to Table I and table IV.
49
2.177
kg
Arm mass
0.735
kg
6.47 10-2
kg m2
1.57 10-3
kg m2
333
Nm/rad
0.35
HT/KT
100
kN/m
0.2
HA/KA
Conductor Self-damping
Curves b,c,d are wind power input curves on each one of the bundle
conductors, for different turbulence levels.
The wind power input used in the analytical-analytical benchmark is
that represented by curve b,
corresponding to low turbulence (It < 0.07)
Table IV wind power input and conductor self-damping for the analytical-analytical benchmark
In figure A.2:
- the continuous lines, reported for reference purpose,
show the results obtained in the case of a single conductor
at the same tensile load of the bundle conductors (the
blue line refers to Diana Model, the red one to Krispin
model),
- the blue diamonds (Diana) and red crosses (Krispin)
represent the maximum amplitude observed on the
bundle conductors.
50
Figure A.2- Predicted maximum Aeolian vibration antinode amplitude (0-peak) as a function of frequency when the same
tensile load is applied on the subconductors and a constant low wind turbulence is considered
In the analytical-experimental benchmark the models described in section 2 - use for the wind power input and
conductor self-damping their own selected function, as
shown in Table I.
Moreover, the data describing the field span and the spacer
are the same as for the analytical-analytical benchmark
(table II and III).
Figure A.3 - Predicted maximum strain (0-peak) on the bundle conductors at the suspension clamp
and at the spacer clamp as a function of frequency
51
Figure A.4: Maximum strains at the suspension clamp with the Diana model : when the same tensile load is applied to the
subconductors of the bundle and a constant turbulence (It < 0.07) is considered
Figure A.5: Maximum strains at suspension clamp with Claren-Cosmai model : when the same tensile load is applied to the
subconductors of the bundle and a constant turbulence (It = 0.05) is considered
52
Figure A.6: Maximum strains with Krispin model : when the same tensile load is applied to the subconductors
of the bundle and a constant, low, wind turbulence is considered
53
Figure A.8: Maximum strains at suspension clamp with the Claren-Cosmai model : tension differential
neglected and variable turbulence (0.20 < It < 0.05) considered
Figure A.9 Maximum strains at suspension clamp with the Diana model : tension differential 1D
and constant turbulence (It < 0.07) considered
Figure A.10: Maximum strains at suspension clamp with Diana model : tension differential 10 D
and constant turbulence (It < 0.07) considered
54
[11.] K. Anderson, P. Hagedorn , On the energy dissipation in spacerdampers in bundled conductor of overhead transmission lines.
Journal of Sound and Vibration, 180(4), pp. 539-556, 19Verma,
H. - Aerodynamic and structural modeling for vortex-excited
vibrations in bundled conductors. Doctors thesis, Darmstadt,
2008
5. References
55
Members:
Jennifer Havel, Jason Huang, Julien Garnier, Sergey Kolosov, Jean Philippe Paradis, Andr Leblond ,
Chuck Rawlins, Umberto Cosmai, Pierre Van Dyke, Jean-Louis Lilien, Wolfgang Troppauer,
Alessandra Manenti , Laura Mazzola, E. Ruggeri, Naji Sahlani, Douglas Proctor, Ccile Roz,
Marta Landeira, Sergio Thaddey, Claude Hardy, Ronald Tong, Bin Liu, A.Bhangor, A Vinogradov,
T.Furtado, M.Araujo.
1. Introduction
56
CHUKAR CONDUCTOR
SMOOTH CYLINDER
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
6
1.7
12
3.3
18
5.0
24
6.7
30
8.4
36
10.0
Vrm/s1
Rex10-4
Figure B.2: Rough cylinders energy with respect to x/D amplitude for the three considered frequencies: experimental numerical comparison.
Due to the model scale, f = 0.5 Hz corresponds to f = 1 Hz full scale
is both the static and dynamic bundle rotation angle with respect to the wind.
57
2.1.Diana Model:
(1)
58
Spacer-damper data
Quad spacer-damper interaxis
457mm
125 Nm/rad
50000 N/m
0.35
0.35
Arm mass
0.71 kg
2.74E-3 kg m2
3.44 kg
Central body mass moment of inertia with respect to the centre of mass:
38.5E-3 kg m2
6.28 kg
Span data
Conductor:
ACSR Bersimis
diameter
35.1mm
mass
2.185 kg/m
Tensile load
34420 N
Span length
450m
40-53-57-50-55-49-58-52-36
The first two load steps for the pretension of the conductor
and the dead load are executed without time integration.
Afterwards a do-loop with time integration and update of
the aerodynamic forces is performed. For the numerical
solution the HHT (Hilber-Hughes-Taylor) algorithm is
applied.
The corresponding model relies on the use of finiteelement nonlinear formulation. Within this approach, the
interaction of subconductors due to the wake is represented
using Simpsons aeroelastic model [2]. A special force
element is created to introduce the aerodynamic loads
due to the wake which are computed according to the
QST. Moreover the aeroelastic properties of the wake
force field are tuned to meet the wake-induced instability
properties, as measured by Price [11]. Extension of the
wake interaction sample onto the full line span (including
spacer-damper, any bundle configuration) is done taking
into account the inertia-stiffness properties of the line
fittings (spacer dampers). More details on [12], [13].
59
Figure B.3: Test set-up showing towers, conductors and anemometers of the test line
Figure B.4: IREQ Measurements: Maximum peak to peak horizontal oscillations as function of mean wind speed.
60
Figure B.5: Benchmark results: Maximum peak to peak horizontal oscillations as a function of mean wind speed.
Bundle tilt
Ratio vertical to horizontal frequency in each
subspan Tensile load
Ratio between bundle separation I and conductor
diameter D (I/D)
Subspan length
Simple and advanced methods can be used nowadays.
Complex FEM model have been applied with success but
they need a very cumbersome analysis which is very much
depending on some details.
4. Conclusions
61
[6.]
[7.]
[8.]
[9.]
[10.]
[11.]
[12.]
[13.]
[14]
5. References
[1.]
[2.]
[3.]
[4.]
[5.]
[15]
EPRI (2009) - Transmission Line Reference Book WindInduced Conductor Motion: Second Edition, Electric Power
Research Institute, Palo Alto, Ca 2009 1018554, USA page 3-25
Simpson A (1971) On the flutter of a smooth circular cylinder
in a wake - The aeronautical Quarterly
Ikegami R et al. (1971) Structural analysis. High Voltage
Power Transmission Systems Boeing Co. Seattle BPA Ctr
14-03-1362N.
Diana G, Giordana F (1972) Sulle vibrazioni di un cilindro in
scia di un altro Analisi del fenomeno con modello analitico
LEnergia Elettrica (1972) No.7 pp 448-57
Ko R G (1973) Theoretical investigation for Hydro-Quebec into
the aerodynamic stability of bundled power line conductors, Part I:
two dimensional stability analysis of a conductor in the wake of a
fixed conductor NRC (Canada) Lan Tech Rep LA-122
[16]
[17]
[18]
62
Abstract
2. Theoretical aspects
The basic theory of optimization [1] of HSIL shows
that, for the same voltage level, the equalization and
maximization of the electric field on the sub-conductors
surface, and/or an increase of the number of subconductors per phase, increases the Surge Impedance
Loading SIL of the lines.
1. Introduction
63
Figure 1 Racket Tower; the drawings distances and heights are in meters
64
65
Cross Rope
Racket
VX Symmetric
Monopole
VX asymmetric
Cat face
Maximum value
18.00
17.76
17.02
16.88
16.05
16.36
Minimum value
15.04
15.00
14.69
14.52
14.67
14.47
19.7
18.4
15.9
16.3
9.4
13.1
Average - phase A
15.7
15.7
15.3
15.1
15.1
15.0
Average - phase B
17.9
17.3
17.0
16.5
16.0
16.0
Average - phase C
15.7
15.7
15.3
15.1
15.1
15.0
Average - General
16.4
16.2
15.9
15.6
15.4
15.3
Table I: Minimum, Maximum and Average values of electric field on conductors surface.
66
5. Comparative analysis of
audible noise (an) and radio
interference (ri)
67
500 kV TL Parameters
R1 (/km)
Positive Sequence
Zero Sequence
Ratio
VX asymmetric
VX Symmetric
Cat face
Racket
Cross Rope
Monopole
0.0171
0.0174
0.0175
0.0173
0.0173
0.0176
X1 (/km)
0.269
0.261
0.268
0.267
0.268
0.265
C1 (nF/km)
16.57
17.07
16.56
16.29
16.36
16.63
SIL (MW)
1205
1240
1205
1199
1196
1214
R0 (/km)
0.349
0.349
0.351
0.373
0.346
0.369
X0 (/km)
1.336
1.342
1.329
1.478
1.496
1.361
C0 (nF/km)
9.840
9.764
9.708
7.620
7.251
9.347
X0/X1
4.98
5.14
4.96
5.55
5.59
5.13
C1/C0
1.68
1.75
1.71
2.14
2.26
1.78
8. Conclusion
Six TL design concepts of 500 kV TL have been analyzed,
with Natural Power (SIL) of 1200 MW, and similar
positive sequence electrical parameters for system
studies and steady state conditions.
The zero sequence impedance differs by up to
36% depending on the phases and sub-conductors
arrangements.
68
9. References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
69