Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Alila, S., Boufi, S., Belgacem, M. N., & Beneventi, D. (2005). Adsorption of a Cationic
Surfactant onto Cellulosic FibersI. Surface Charge Effects. Langmuir , 21(22),
81068113.
AlMaadeed, M. A., Labidi, S., Krupa, I., & Ouederni, M. (2015). Effect of waste wax
and chain structure on the mechanical and physical properties of polyethylene.
Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 8, 388399.
AlMaadeed, M. A., Ouederni, M., & Noorunnisa Khanam, P. (2013). Effect of chain
structure on the properties of Glass fibre/polyethylene composites. Materials &
Design, 47, 725730.
Arrakhiz, F. Z., El Achaby, M., Kakou, A. C., Vaudreuil, S., Benmoussa, K., Bouhfid,
R., Qaiss, A. (2012). Mechanical properties of high density polyethylene
reinforced with chemically modified coir fibers: Impact of chemical treatments.
Materials and Design, 37, 379383.
Asumani, O. M. L., Reid, R. G., & Paskaramoorthy, R. (2012). The effects of alkali
silane treatment on the tensile and flexural properties of short fibre non-woven
kenaf reinforced polypropylene composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science
and Manufacturing, 43, 14311440.
Ayrilmis, N., Jarusombuti, S., Fueangvivat, V., Bauchongkol, P., & White, R. H.
(2011). Coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composite panel for automotive
interior applications. Fibers and Polymers, 12(7), 919926.
Bahuleyan, B. K., Atieh, M. A., De, S. K., Khan, M. J., & Al-Harthi, M. A. (2012).
Easy one-pot method to control the morphology of polyethylene/carbon nanotube
65
Cao, X. V., Ismail, H., Rashid, A. A., Takeichi, T., & Vo-Huu, T. (2012). Maleated
Natural Rubber as a Coupling Agent for Recycled High Density
Polyethylene/Natural Rubber/Kenaf Powder Biocomposites. Polymer-Plastics
Technology and Engineering, 51(9), 904910.
Chang, S., Ismail, H., & Ahsan, Q. (2012). Effect of Maleic Anhydride of Kenaf Dust
Filled Polycaprolactone/Thermoplastic Sago Starch Composites. BioResources,
7(2), 15941616.
Chun, K. S., Husseinsyah, S., & Osman, H. (2013). Modified Cocoa Pod Husk-Filled
Polypropylene Composites by Using Methacrylic Acid. BioResources, 8(3),
32603275.
Darie, R., Bercea, M., Kozlowski, M., & Spiridon, I. (2011). Evaluation of properties
of LDPE/oak wood composites exposed to artificial ageing. Cellulose Chemistry
66
and
Technology,
45(1-2),
127135.
Retrieved
http://www.cellulosechemtechnol.ro/pdf/CCT1-2(2011)/p.127-135.pdf
from
Datta, J., & Kopczynska, P. (2015). Effect of kenaf fibre modification on morphology
and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane materials. Industrial
Crops and Products, 74, 566576.
Deleu, M., Gatard, S., Payen, E., Lins, L., Nott, K., Flore, C., Bouquillon, S. (2012).
d-xylose-based bolaamphiphiles: Synthesis and influence of the spacer nature on
their interfacial and membrane properties. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 15(1), 68
74.
Faruk, O., Bledzki, A. K., Fink, H. P., & Sain, M. (2012). Biocomposites reinforced
with natural fibers: 2000-2010. Progress in Polymer Science, 37(11), 15521596.
Faruk, O., Bledzki, A. K., Fink, H.-P., & Sain, M. (2014). Progress Report on Natural
Fiber Reinforced Composites. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering,
299(1), 926.
Feng, Q., Li, J., Cheng, H., Chen, F., & Xie, Y. (2014). Synthesis and Characterization
of Porous Hydrogel Based on Lignin and Polyacrylamide. BioResources, 9(3),
43694381.
67
Fuqua, M. A., Huo, S., & Ulven, C. A. (2012). Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites.
Polymer Reviews, 52(3-4), 259320.
Gadioli, R., Morais, J. A., Waldman, W. R., & De Paoli, M. A. (2014). The role of
lignin in polypropylene composites with semi-bleached cellulose fibers:
Mechanical properties and its activity as antioxidant. Polymer Degradation and
Stability, 108, 2334.
Gong, X., Liu, J., Baskaran, S., Voise, R. D., & Young, J. S. (2000). Surfactant-assisted
processing of carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Chemistry of Materials,
12(4), 10491052.
Goriparthi, B. K., Suman, K. N. S., & Mohan Rao, N. (2012). Effect of fiber surface
treatments on mechanical and abrasive wear performance of polylactide/jute
composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 43(10),
18001808.
Hill, G., & Holman, J. (2014). Unsaturated Hydrocarbons. In Chemistry in Context (6th
ed., p. 427). Oxford University Press.
Ho, M., Wang, H., Lee, J.-H., Ho, C., Lau, K., Leng, J., & Hui, D. (2012). Critical
factors on manufacturing processes of natural fibre composites. Composites Part
B: Engineering, 43(8), 35493562.
68
Hsu, C. T., & Hu, C. C. (2013). Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous spinel
NiCo2O 4 using surfactant-assembled dispersion for asymmetric supercapacitors.
Journal of Power Sources, 242, 662671.
Hu, Y., Lang, A. W., Li, X., & Nutt, S. R. (2014). Hygrothermal aging effects on
fatigue of glass fi ber / polydicyclopentadiene composites. Polymer Degradation
and Stability, 110, 464472.
Huang, F.-Y. (2012). Thermal Properties and Thermal Degradation of Cellulose TriStearate (CTs). Polymers, 4(2), 10121024.
Huang, R. Y. M., Moon, G. Y., & Pal, R. (2001). Chitosan / anionic surfactant complex
membranes for the pervaporation separation of methanol / MTBE and
characterization of the polymer / surfactant system. Journal of Membrane
Science, 184, 115.
Ismail, H., Abdullah, a. H., & Bakar, a. A. (2010). The Effects of a Silane-Based
Coupling Agent on the Properties of Kenaf Core-Reinforced High-Density
Polyethylene (HDPE)/Soya Powder Composites. Polymer-Plastics Technology
and Engineering, 49(11), 10951100.
Jin, H., Lu, Y., Ma, P.-P., Wu, S.-S., & Shen, J. (2014). Structure and properties of
irradiated HDPE high-density polyethylene/calcium carbonate composites.
Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 111.
69
Kabir, M. M., Wang, H., Lau, K. T., & Cardona, F. (2012a). Chemical treatments on
plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview.
Composites Part B: Engineering, 43(7), 28832892.
Kabir, M. M., Wang, H., Lau, K. T., Cardona, F., & Aravinthan, T. (2012b). Mechanical
properties of chemically-treated hemp fibre reinforced sandwich composites.
Composites Part B: Engineering, 43(2), 159169.
Kadam, P. G., Vaidya, P., & Mhaske, S. T. (2014). Synthesis and Characterization of
Polyesteramide Hot Melt Adhesive from Low Purity Dimer Acid ,
Ethylenediamine , and Ethanolamine. Journals of Polymers, 2014, 18.
Khalil, H. P. S. A., Aprilia, N. a S., Bhat, a. H., Jawaid, M., Paridah, M. T., & Rudi, D.
(2013). A Jatropha biomass as renewable materials for biocomposites and its
applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 667685.
Kolesov, I., & Mileva, D. (2014). Mechanical behavior and optical transparency of
polyamide 6 of different morphology formed by variation of the pathway of
crystallization, 581593.
Ku, H., Wang, H., Pattarachaiyakoop, N., & Trada, M. (2011). A review on the tensile
properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites Part B:
Engineering, 42(4), 856873.
Kulkarni, R. V., Baraskar, V. V., Setty, C. M., & Sa, B. (2011). Interpenetrating polymer
network matrices of sodium alginate and carrageenan for controlled drug delivery
application. Fibers and Polymers, 12(3), 352358.
70
Li, J., Zhao, M., & Zheng, L. (2012). Salt-induced wormlike micelles formed by Nalkyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium bromide in aqueous solution. Colloids and
Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 396, 1621.
Li, Y. (2014). Characterization of acetylated eucalyptus wood fibers and its effect on
the interface of eucalyptus wood/polypropylene composites. International
Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 50, 96101.
Lithner, D., Larsson, A., & Dave, G. (2011). Environmental and health hazard ranking
and assessment of plastic polymers based on chemical composition. The Science
of the Total Environment, 409(18), 33093324.
Liu, Q., Zhou, X., Fan, X., Zhu, C., Yao, X., & Liu, Z. (2012). Mechanical and Thermal
Properties of Epoxy Resin Nanocomposites Reinforced with Graphene Oxide.
Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 51(3), 251256.
Ma, T. Y., Cao, J. L., Shao, G. S., Zhang, X. J., & Yuan, Z. Y. (2009). Hierarchically
structured squama-like cerium-doped titania: Synthesis, photoactivity, and
catalytic CO oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 113(38), 1665816667.
Mannion, A. M. (2006). Carbon and Its Domestication. Springer Science & Bussiness
Media.
Retrieved
from
https://books.google.com.my/books?id=WedL9wvMQEC
Mbarek, T. B., Robert, L., Sammouda, H., Charrier, B., Orteu, J.-J., & Hugot, F. (2013).
Effect of acetylation and additive on the tensile properties of wood fiber-highdensity polyethylene composite. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites,
32(21), 16461655.
71
Me, R. C., Ibrahim, R., & Tahir, P. M. (2012). Natural Based Biocomposite Material for
Prosthetic Socket Fabrication. ALAM CIPTA, 5(1), 2734.
Mohanty, S., Verma, S., & Nayak, S. (2006). Dynamic mechanical and thermal
properties of MAPE treated jute/HDPE composites. Composites Science and
Technology, 66(3-4), 538547.
Mousa, A., Heinrich, G., Wagenknecht, U., Kretzschmar, B., & Landwehr, M. A. Der.
(2012). The Application of Di-isocyante Modified Agro-polymer as Filler For
XNBR/PA-12 Thermoplastic Elastomer Composites. Journal of Macromolecular
Science, Part A, 49(5), 385396.
Nagarajan, V., Zhang, K., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2015). Overcoming the
Fundamental Challenges in Improving the Impact Strength and Crystallinity of
PLA Biocomposites: Influence of Nucleating Agent and Mold Temperature. ACS
Applied Materials & Interfaces, 7(21), 1120311214.
Nostro, A., Scaffaro, R., DArrigo, M., Botta, L., Filocamo, A., Marino, A., &
Bisignano, G. (2012). Study on carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde polymeric films:
Mechanical properties, release kinetics and antibacterial and antibiofilm
activities. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 96(4), 10291038.
72
Othman, N., Ismail, H., & Mariatti, M. (2006). Effect of compatibilisers on mechanical
and thermal properties of bentonite filled polypropylene composites. Polymer
Degradation and Stability, 91(8), 17611774.
Ouajai, S., & Shanks, R. a. (2005). Composition, structure and thermal degradation of
hemp cellulose after chemical treatments. Polymer Degradation and Stability,
89(2), 327335.
Pang,
A., & Ismail, H. (2013). Effects of kenaf loading and 3aminopropyltriethoxysilane coupling agent on the properties of
polypropylene/waste tire dust/kenaf composites. Journal of Thermoplastic
Composite Materials, 27(12), 16071619.
Rajini, N., Jappes, J. W., Jeyaraj, P., Rajakarunakaran, S., & Bennet, C. (2013). Effect
of Montmorillonite Nanoclay on Temperature Dependence Mechanical Properties
of Naturally Woven Coconut Sheath/Polyester Composite. Journal of Reinforced
Plastics and Composites, 32(11), 811822.
Roy, A., Chakraborty, S., Kundu, S. P., Basak, R. K., Basu Majumder, S., & Adhikari,
B. (2012). Improvement in mechanical properties of jute fibres through mild
alkali treatment as demonstrated by utilisation of the Weibull distribution model.
Bioresource Technology, 107, 222228.
73
Saba, N., Paridah, M. T., & Jawaid, M. (2015). Mechanical properties of kenaf fibre
reinforced polymer composite: A review. Construction and Building Materials,
76, 8796.
Salleh, F. M., Hassan, A., Yahya, R., Lafia-Araga, R. a., Azzahari, A. D., & Nazir, M.
N. Z. M. (2014). Improvement in the mechanical performance and interfacial
behavior of kenaf fiber reinforced high density polyethylene composites by the
addition of maleic anhydride grafted high density polyethylene. Journal of
Polymer Research, 21(5), 111.
Sanches, E. A., Carolino, A. D. S., Santos, A. L., Fernandes, E. G. R., Trichs, D. M., &
Mascarenhas, Y. P. (2015). The Use of Le Bail Method to Analyze the
Semicrystalline Pattern of a Nanocomposite Based on Polyaniline EmeraldineSalt Form and? -Al 2 O 3. Advance in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015,
18.
Santiagoo, R., Ismail, H., & Hussin, K. (2012). Effects of Acetic Anhydride on the
Properties of Polypropylene(PP)/Recycled Acrylonitrile Butadiene(NBRr)/Rice
Husk Powder(RHP) Composites. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering,
51(15), 15051512.
Sareena, C., Ramesan, M. T., & Purushothaman, E. (2012). Utilization of peanut shell
powder as a novel filler in natural rubber. Journal of Applied Polymer Science,
125(3), 23222334.
74
Sarkhel, G., Banerjee, A., & Bhattacharya, P. (2006). Rheological and Mechanical
Properties of LDPE/HDPE Blends. Polymer-Plastics Technology and
Engineering, 45(6), 713718.
Saw,
Sawpan, M. a., Pickering, K. L., & Fernyhough, A. (2011). Effect of various chemical
treatments on the fibre structure and tensile properties of industrial hemp fibres.
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 42(8), 888895.
Sewda, K., & Maiti, S. N. (2013). Dynamic mechanical properties of high density
polyethylene and teak wood flour composites. Polymer Bulletin, 70(10), 2657
2674.
Shalwan, A., & Yousif, B. F. (2013). In State of Art: Mechanical and tribological
behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibres. Materials & Design,
48, 1424.
Shamsuri, A. A., Azid, M. K. A., Ariff, A. H. M., & Sudari, A. K. (2014a). Influence of
Surface Treatment on Tensile Properties of Low-Density Polyethylene/Cellulose
Woven Biocomposites: A Preliminary Study. Polymers, 6(9), 23452356.
75
Shamsuri, A. A., Daik, R., & Products, F. (2013). Utilization of an Ionic Liquid/Urea
Mixture as a Physical Coupling Agent for Agarose/Talc Composite Films.
Materials, 682698.
Shamsuri, A. A., Daik, R., Zainudin, E. S., & Md. Tahir, P. (2014b). Compatibilization
of HDPE/agar biocomposites with eutectic-based ionic liquid containing
surfactant. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 33(5), 440453.
Shamsuri, A. A., Sudari, A. K., Zainudin, E. S., & Ghazali, M. (2015). Effect of
alkaline treatment on physico-mechanical properties of black rice husk ash filled
polypropylene biocomposites. Materials Testing, 57, 370376.
Shibulal, G. S., & Naskar, K. (2011). RFL coated aramid short fiber reinforced
thermoplastic elastomer: Mechanical, rheological and morphological
characteristics. Journal of Polymer Research, 18(6), 22952306.
Siddika, S., Mansura, F., Hasan, M., & Hassan, A. (2014). Effect of reinforcement and
chemical treatment of fiber on The Properties of jute-coir fiber reinforced hybrid
polypropylene composites. Fibers and Polymers, 15(5), 10231028.
Siqueira, G., Bras, J., & Dufresne, A. (2010). Cellulosic bionanocomposites: A review
of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers, 2(4), 728765.
Skalkova, P., Cizova, A., Moskova, D. J., & Janigova, I. (2012). Ldpe /
Glucuronoxylan Blends: Preparation and Study of Thermal and Mechanical
Properties. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology, 46(1-2), 6977.
Sudhakara, P., Jagadeesh, D., Wang, Y., Venkata Prasad, C., Devi, a. P. K.,
Balakrishnan, G., Song, J. I. (2013). Fabrication of Borassus fruit
76
lignocellulose fiber/PP composites and comparison with jute, sisal and coir
fibers. Carbohydrate Polymers, 98(1), 10021010.
Tajvidi, M., & Takemura, A. (2009). Effect of Fiber Content and Type, Compatibilizer
and Heating Rate on Thermogravimetric Properties of Natural Fiber High
Density Polyethylene Composites. Polymer Composites, 30, 12261233.
Thakur, V. K., Thakur, M. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2014). Review: Raw Natural Fiber
Based Polymer Composites. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and
Characterization, 19(3), 256271.
Tisserat, B., Reifschneider, L., Joshee, N., & Finkenstadt, V. L. (2013). Evaluation of
Paulownia elongata wood polyethylene composites. Journal of Thermoplastic
Composite Materials, 120.
Touhtouh, S., Becquart, F., Pillon, C., & Taha, M. (2011). Effect of Compatibilization
on poly-3-caprolactone grafting onto poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol). Polymers,
3(4), 17341749.
77
Tran, L. Q. N., Fuentes, C. a., Dupont-Gillain, C., Van Vuure, a. W., & Verpoest, I.
(2013). Understanding the interfacial compatibility and adhesion of natural coir
fibre thermoplastic composites. Composites Science and Technology, 80, 2330.
Vieira, M. G. A., da Silva, M. A., dos Santos, L. O., & Beppu, M. M. (2011). Naturalbased plasticizers and biopolymer films: A review. European Polymer Journal,
47(3), 254263.
Wang, Y., & Yang, J. F. (2010). Physical properties and biodegradation of acrylic acid
grafted poly(3-caprolactone)/chitosan blends. Journal of Polymer Research,
17(2), 221232.
Wanjale, S. D., & Jog, J. P. (2011). Polyolefin-Based Natural Fiber Composites. In S.
Kalia, B. S. Kaith, & I. Kaur (Eds.), Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer
Composites (1st ed., pp. 377398). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Xie, Y., Hill, C. a S., Xiao, Z., Militz, H., & Mai, C. (2010). Silane coupling agents
used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review. Composites Part A: Applied
Science and Manufacturing, 41(7), 806819.
Xin, F., & Li, L. (2012). The role of silane coupling agent in carbon
nanotube/polypropylene composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 46(26),
32673275.
Xiong, Z., Yang, Y., Feng, J., Zhang, X., Zhang, C., Tang, Z., & Zhu, J. (2013).
Preparation and characterization of poly ( lactic acid )/ starch composites
toughened with epoxidized soybean oil. Carbohydrate Polymers, 92(1), 810816.
Yousif, B. F., & Ku, H. (2012). Suitability of using coir fiber/polymeric composite for
the design of liquid storage tanks. Materials and Design, 36, 847853.
78
Zhang, R., Huang, H., Yang, W., Xiao, X., & Hu, Y. (2012). Preparation and
characterization of bio-nanocomposites based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4hydroxybutyrate) and CoAl layered double hydroxide using melt intercalation.
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 43(4), 547552.
79
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Calculation for Weight of Surfactants
80
40w
100 w
i) w = 4 wt.%,
ii) w = 8 wt.%,
iv) w = 16 wt.%
iii) w = 12 wt.%,
x
40(12)
100 (12)
5.45
v) w = 20 wt.%,
x
40(20)
100 (20)
10
i) w = 1 wt.%,
iv) w = 4 wt.%
ii) w = 2 wt.%,
x
iii) w = 3 wt.%,
40(3)
100 (3)
1.24
v) w = 5 wt.%,
x
= 81
40(5)
100 (5)
2.11
82
0 wt.%
4 wt.%
8 wt.%
12 wt.%
16 wt.%
20 wt.%
Processing 1
18.485
14.015
13.255
Processing 2
19.805
13.935
13.105
12.285
13.36
17.975
13.495
15.225
17.775
Processing 3
18.855
15.97
13.585
13.785
15.31
16.145
Processing 4
17.085
13.91
14.25
13.83
17.395
19.41
Average
18.5575
14.4575
13.54875
13.34875
15.3225
17.82625
4 wt.%
8 wt.%
12 wt.%
16 wt.%
20 wt.%
Processing 1
18.485
14.605
15.455
17.24
19.185
20.415
Processing 2
19.805
15.055
15.675
17.26
19.37
20.525
Processing 3
18.855
15.85
16.235
17.495
19.405
20.6
Processing 4
17.085
15.975
15.685
17.455
19.22
20.54
Average
18.5575
15.37125
15.7625
17.3625
19.295
20.52
1 wt.%
2 wt.%
3 wt.%
4 wt.%
5 wt.%
Processing 1
18.485
18.1
17.29
15.79
14.95
10.385
Processing 2
19.805
18.965
16.48
15.835
14.755
11.095
Processing 3
18.855
16.775
17.695
16.305
14.645
11.28
Processing 4
17.085
17.305
18.135
15.98
14.305
10.945
Average
18.5575
17.78625
17.4
15.9775
14.66375
10.92625
8 wt.%
12 wt.%
16 wt.%
20 wt.%
4 wt.%
84
Processing 1
168.7
167.3
158.5
158.4
159.9
160.7
Processing 2
167.6
164.2
159.5
159.2
161.2
164.7
Processing 3
168.3
159.7
159.1
158.4
159
163.7
Processing 4
169.6
159.7
159.1
159
160.2
163.9
Average
168.55
162.725
159.05
158.75
160.075
163.25
4 wt.%
8 wt.%
12 wt.%
16 wt.%
20 wt.%
Processing 1
168.7
162.2
161.5
165
168.4
170.7
Processing 2
167.6
162.4
162.6
164.7
168.2
170.8
Processing 3
168.3
162.5
163.2
164.6
168.3
170.8
Processing 4
169.6
162.3
163
164.6
168.5
171.2
Average
168.55
162.35
162.575
164.725
168.35
170.875
1 wt.%
2 wt.%
3 wt.%
4 wt.%
5 wt.%
Processing 1
168.7
166.5
164.4
163.1
161.8
157.4
Processing 2
167.6
166.7
164.7
162.6
161.3
158.1
Processing 3
168.3
165.3
165.8
163.1
161.2
158.3
Processing 4
169.6
168
165.5
163.1
161.1
158.3
Average
168.55
166.625
165.1
162.975
161.35
158.025
Formula of Average
85
= mean of properties
= standard deviation
i)
Tensile strength
(Mpa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.814
207.07
1.575
3.7
2.401
213.696
1.058
3.64
2.54
197.012
1.48
3.61
2.69
264.372
1.254
3.54
2.604
279.213
1.42
3.53
2.739
227.928
1.253
3.51
2.6
218.31
1.383
3.48
2.635
224.212
1.546
3.77
2.555
254.143
1.867
3.76
10
Averag
e
2.516
255.552
1.362
3.74
2.609
234.151
1.42
3.628
0.118
27.328
0.22
0.11
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
0.925
3.85
Sample
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
2.571
229.805
(MPa)
86
2.527
235.797
0.879
3.72
2.662
248.589
0.872
3.66
2.457
229.305
0.865
3.63
2.809
242.905
0.833
3.61
2.937
275.839
0.839
3.59
2.787
241.246
0.734
3.55
2.564
228.432
0.825
3.41
2.874
276.721
0.85
3.29
10
Averag
e
2.799
277.442
0.858
3.11
2.699
248.608
0.848
3.542
0.164
20.405
0.049
0.217
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
3.48
243.783
0.933
3.65
3.279
262.964
0.925
3.64
3.218
280.561
0.858
3.56
3.386
318.488
0.817
3.54
2.754
277.783
0.775
3.5
2.652
246.549
0.75
3.5
3.086
272.837
0.749
3.49
2.738
253.833
0.744
3.44
3.037
274.034
0.717
3.41
10
Averag
e
3.444
285.499
0.717
3.31
3.107
271.633
0.798
3.504
0.306
21.881
0.081
0.103
Standard Deviation
Sample
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
87
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
3.456
347.479
0.833
3.29
3.679
291.934
0.775
3.23
3.653
265.035
0.892
3.23
2.904
242.327
0.755
3.21
2.81
267.606
0.683
3.21
3.187
290.078
0.757
3.12
2.96
290.178
0.783
3.05
3.397
335.826
0.741
3.02
3.456
347.479
0.833
2.99
10
Averag
e
3.228
256.766
0.671
2.98
3.273
293.471
0.772
3.133
0.307
38.142
0.068
0.115
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.9
272.564
0.535
2.877
292.548
0.55
2.95
3.098
291.482
0.483
2.94
2.88
302.644
0.508
2.87
3.082
280.532
0.533
2.86
2.799
257.854
0.642
2.85
2.73
288.994
0.525
2.84
3.058
288.228
0.571
2.76
2.627
251.029
0.574
2.65
10
Averag
e
3.035
307
0.716
2.65
2.909
283.288
0.564
2.837
0.16
18.126
0.069
0.119
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
v) 16 wt.% of HTAB
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
88
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.812
277.600
0.619
2.520
2.892
301.658
0.512
2.460
2.870
270.325
0.533
2.380
2.640
369.499
0.475
2.310
2.730
210.923
0.533
2.220
2.885
248.409
0.450
2.160
2.753
315.661
0.367
2.100
2.742
226.665
0.610
2.090
2.938
335.452
0.408
2.040
10
Averag
e
2.653
218.984
0.609
2.010
2.792
277.518
0.512
2.229
0.104
52.916
0.087
0.180
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.375
180.748
0.983
3.730
2.367
192.394
0.797
3.700
2.425
219.528
0.892
3.670
2.591
229.587
0.900
3.600
2.482
196.538
0.869
3.200
2.641
246.924
0.882
3.190
2.293
228.674
0.839
3.140
2.260
194.323
1.017
3.130
2.012
177.714
1.000
3.010
10
Averag
e
2.210
214.234
0.908
2.990
2.365
208.066
0.909
3.336
0.186
23.099
0.071
0.301
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
Sodium Stearate, SS
vii) 4 wt.% of SS
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
viii) 8 wt.% of SS
89
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.418
197.515
0.800
3.430
2.310
205.276
0.783
3.280
2.455
209.974
0.900
3.180
2.519
200.905
0.842
3.090
2.271
194.594
1.093
3.000
2.172
220.897
0.900
2.980
2.251
193.733
0.783
2.940
2.246
200.960
0.733
2.940
2.287
202.333
0.832
2.930
10
Averag
e
2.521
210.643
0.793
2.920
2.345
203.683
0.846
3.069
0.124
8.323
0.101
0.175
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.570
194.093
0.508
3.390
2.472
177.066
0.975
2.910
2.320
214.918
0.540
2.900
2.268
194.070
0.733
2.860
2.121
183.586
0.637
2.750
2.570
194.093
0.508
2.720
2.161
201.088
0.567
2.720
2.113
183.218
0.675
2.680
2.153
203.241
0.741
2.670
10
Averag
e
2.403
217.798
0.683
2.620
2.315
196.317
0.657
2.822
0.181
13.322
0.142
0.223
Standard Deviation
ix)
(MPa)
12 wt.% of SS
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
90
x)
16 wt.% of SS
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.361
185.517
0.617
3.110
2.550
225.746
0.492
2.940
2.340
186.297
0.651
2.930
2.654
200.741
0.608
2.910
2.211
187.065
0.584
2.830
2.182
186.953
0.585
2.680
2.449
185.845
0.655
2.530
2.468
207.239
0.517
2.500
1.946
196.579
0.578
2.390
10
Averag
e
1.780
181.512
0.550
2.360
2.294
194.349
0.584
2.718
0.271
13.685
0.053
0.262
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
1.860
215.373
0.434
2.950
2.062
214.646
0.467
2.770
1.961
208.662
0.417
2.750
2.083
206.236
0.542
2.710
1.861
204.660
0.492
2.690
2.243
201.489
0.450
2.510
1.982
191.785
0.500
2.380
2.216
186.631
0.667
2.340
2.459
175.973
0.576
2.260
10
Averag
e
1.388
137.093
0.408
2.250
2.012
194.255
0.495
2.561
0.287
23.663
0.081
0.245
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
xi)20 wt.% of SS
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
91
Sorbitan Monostearate, SM
xii) 1 wt.% of SM
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
1.996
227.310
1.719
4.290
3.199
240.145
1.718
4.280
2.208
264.016
1.368
4.260
2.281
201.687
1.659
4.240
2.114
192.814
1.650
4.180
2.876
245.887
1.809
4.170
2.953
208.165
1.631
4.150
2.482
196.234
1.600
4.110
2.945
180.225
1.597
4.100
10
Averag
e
2.545
184.722
1.492
3.990
2.560
214.120
1.624
4.177
0.413
28.533
0.124
0.095
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus (MPa)
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.848
249.264
1.276
4.530
2.504
185.571
1.755
4.500
2.035
282.945
1.725
4.410
2.517
236.595
2.133
4.360
2.454
161.754
1.683
4.250
1.977
148.126
1.675
4.230
2.044
181.296
1.508
4.120
3.137
247.044
1.490
4.070
2.288
195.455
2.006
4.120
10
2.045
194.201
1.442
3.900
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
xiii)2 wt.% of SM
92
Averag
e
2.385
208.225
1.669
4.249
0.387
43.396
0.259
0.202
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
(MPa)
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
2.366
167.515
2.089
4.600
2.350
162.961
2.108
4.490
2.715
229.491
1.675
4.440
2.825
234.253
1.592
4.420
1.689
269.222
1.575
4.400
2.253
141.029
2.251
4.400
2.160
166.676
1.392
4.380
2.535
265.145
1.383
4.370
2.146
188.788
1.350
4.350
10
Averag
e
2.090
200.554
1.281
4.330
2.313
202.563
1.670
4.418
0.329
44.912
0.355
0.079
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus (MPa)
Sample
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
1.828
211.289
1.608
4.680
1.956
192.958
1.602
4.670
2.197
175.927
2.183
4.590
1.663
192.179
1.533
4.580
2.102
225.719
1.533
4.550
1.960
187.410
1.505
4.530
1.807
176.996
1.433
4.500
2.616
221.143
1.967
4.490
Standard Deviation
xiv)3 wt.% of SM
Standard Deviation
xv)4 wt.% of SM
93
2.107
182.748
2.023
4.480
10
Averag
e
2.306
194.193
1.842
4.450
2.054
196.056
1.723
4.552
0.276
17.606
0.260
0.078
Sample
Tensile strength
(MPa)
Modulus
Tensile Extension
(mm/mm)
Impact Strength
(kJ/m2)
1.914
204.887
1.327
4.400
1.865
192.176
1.650
4.390
1.809
162.035
1.867
4.360
1.963
181.457
1.557
4.310
1.817
156.880
1.891
4.280
1.914
161.541
1.836
4.270
2.276
217.088
1.742
4.260
1.778
185.131
1.683
4.240
2.122
182.918
1.666
4.200
10
Averag
e
2.149
224.316
1.660
4.200
1.961
186.843
1.688
4.291
0.167
23.271
0.166
0.073
Standard Deviation
xvi)5 wt.% of SM
Standard Deviation
(MPa)
94
BIODATA OF STUDENT
AHMAD KHUZAIRI BIN SUDARI was born on 18 th of January 1990 in Johor Bahru.
He received the B.Eng.Tech degree in Polymer from University Kuala Lumpur
Malaysian Institute of Chemical and Bioengineering Technology (UniKL MICET), in
year 2013. Currently, he is a lecturer in School of Mechanical Engineering at
Technology Park Malaysia College, Kuala Lumpur. He had enrolled as a M.Sc. in
Biocomposites Technology student in Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products
(INTROP) since September 2013, and also working part time as a research assistant
under supervision of Assoc. Prof. Dr. Edi Syams Zainudin and Dr Ahmad Adlie bin
Shamsuri. His current research interest includes Polymer Science and Technology, and
Composite Technology.
95
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
Sudari, A. K., Shamsuri, A. A., Zainudin, E. S., & Tahir, P. M. (2015). Exploration on
compatibilizing effect of non-ionic, anionic and cationic surfactants on
mechanical, morphological and chemical properties of high density
polyethylene/low density polyethylene/cellulose biocomposites. Journal of
Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 130. doi: 10.1177/ 0892705715614064
96
97
RESTRICTED
OPEN ACCESS
________________________
(Signature of Student)
New IC No/ Passport No.:
____________________
(Signature of Chairman
of Supervisory Committee)
Name:
Date :
Date :
[Note : If the thesis is CONFIDENTIAL or RESTRICTED, please attach with
the letter from the organization/institution with period and reasons for
confidentially or restricted. ]
98