2008 E Footprint Accouting 3-14-08

All Sites
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project Estimated Percent Cost Savings, Estimated This column
description Energy, Water, reduction USD Capital costs, information
GHGs, or Waste from 2007 USD incomplete: factory
Reductions responses needed
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 3,000,611 2,233,706 142,803 6% $2,809,876 $773,045
Electricity consumption 1,334,868 1,109,399 88,732 8% $2,496,138 $767,695
Natural Gas consumption 1,447,611 925,046 54,071 6% $313,638 $5,000
Other fuel consumption 218,132 199,261 0 $100 $350
Total Water Consumption, m3 6,907,027 5,659,249 243,571 4% $81,310 $48,000
Municipal 0 0
Well 0 4,460,746 See
Outputs individual
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 283,673 221,870 factory tabs 13,891 6%
Indirect Emissions 194,285 160,009 11,317 7%
Direct NG emisions 72,196 47,256 for project 2,575 5%
Other direct emissions
Total Effluent Discharged, m3
17,192
5,748,446
14,605
4,813,324
descriptions 0
144,189 3%
To WWTP 0 0
To municipal 0 0
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 35,144 26,988 489 2% $50,000
Waste Disposed 21,704 16,427 489
Waste Recycled 13,440 10,561 0
Total $2,941,187 $821,045
Americas Region EMEAI East Region EMEAI West R
Estimated Percent Cost Estimated Estimated Percent Cost Estimated Estimated
Energy, reduction Savings, Capital Energy, reduction Savings, Capital Energy,
Water, from 2007 USD costs, USD Water, from 2007 USD costs, USD Water,
GHGs, or GHGs, or GHGs, or
Waste Waste Waste
Reductions Reductions Reductions
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 50,102 6% $680,430 $253,500 41,522 13% $461,349 $0 23,487
Electricity consumption 17,705 4% $422,644 $248,500 19,848 15% $405,497 $0 23,487
Natural Gas consumption 32,397 8% $257,786 $5,000 21,674 14% $55,852 $0 0
Other fuel consumption 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 46,477 12% $61,350 $0 33,310 19% $7,880 $0 133,822
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 5,483 6% 2,782 11% 3,336
Indirect Emissions 4,015 6% 1,675 11% 3,336
Direct NG emisions 1,468 7% 1,107 14% 0
Other direct emissions 0 0 0
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0% 10,328 13% 128,462
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 0 0% $50,000 0 0% 113
Waste Disposed 0 0 113
Waste Recycled 0 0 0
Total $791,779 $253,500 $469,228 $0
EMEAI West Region Asia / Pac Region
Percent Cost Estimated Estimated Percent Cost Estimated
reduction Savings, Capital Energy, reduction Savings, Capital
from 2007 USD costs, USD Water, from 2007 USD costs, USD
GHGs, or
Waste
Reductions
3% $993,421 $33,000 27,692 8% $673,577 $486,195

8% $993,421 $33,000 27,692 15% $673,577 $486,195
0% $0 $0 0 0% $0 $0
$0 $0 0 $0 $0
3% $0 $0 29,962 7% $10,581 $48,000
6% 2,291 5%
9% 2,291 6%
0% 0 0%
0
3% 5,399 2%
1% 376 6%
376
0
$993,421 $33,000 $684,158 $534,195
Americas Region
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Savings,
description Water, GHGs, or reduction from USD
Waste Reductions 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 1,336,492 881,681 50,102 6% $680,430
Electricity consumption 553,973 479,149 17,705 4% $422,644
Natural Gas consumption 782,519 402,532 32,397 8% $257,786
Other fuel consumption 0 0 0 $0
Total Water Consumption, m3 812,410 385,252 46,477 12% $61,350
Municipal 0 0
Well 0 0 See
Outputs individual
0
387,766
0
128,408
descriptions 0
0 0%
To WWTP 0 0
To municipal 0 0
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 16,496 10,920 0 0% $50,000
Total $791,779
Estimated
Capital costs,
USD
$253,500
$248,500
$5,000
$0
$0
$253,500
EMEAI EAST Sites
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 321,254 329,715 41,522 13% $462,449
Natural Gas consumption 141,493 154,812 21,674 14% $55,852
Other fuel consumption 44,895 43,800 0 $100
Municipal 0 0
Well 0 0 See
Outputs individual
3,128
62,227
3,052
76,923
descriptions 0
10,328 13%
To WWTP 0 0
To municipal 0 0
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,467 1,071 0 0%
Waste Disposed 945 697 0
Waste Recycled 523 374 0
Total $471,828
Estimated
Capital costs,
USD
$350
$0
$0
$350
$0
$350
Asia/Pac Region
Inputs
Natural Gas consumption 17,902 11,530 0 0% $0
Municipal 0 0
Well 0 0 See
Outputs individual
Direct NG emisions 914 589 for project 0 0%
12,222
277,320
10,605
261,600
descriptions 0
5,399 2%
To WWTP 0 0
To municipal 0 0
Total $684,158
Estimated
Capital costs,
USD
$486,195
$486,195
$0
$0
$48,000
$534,195
EMEAI WEST Sites
Inputs
Natural Gas consumption 505,697 356,172 0 0% $0
Total Water Consumption, m3 5,381,348 4,653,881 133,822 3% $0
Municipal 0 0
Well 0 4,460,746 See
Outputs individual
Direct NG emisions 24,022 18,194 for project 0 0%
1,842
5,021,133
948
4,346,393
descriptions 0
128,462 3%
To WWTP 0 0
To municipal 0 0
Total $993,421
Estimated
Capital costs,
USD
$33,000
$33,000
$0
$0
$0
$33,000
Antipolo City
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent reduction Cost
Water, GHGs, or from 2007 savings,
Waste Reductions USD
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 28,562 27,830 8346 30% $311,019
Electricity consumption 22,162 21,011 total electrical reduction 8346 40% $311,019
New boiler installation - site reports this as 3941 19% $200,666
project for 2008
Lighting: install an automatic light flux regulator 18 0% $917
Improve monitoring of chillers efficiency 23 0% $1,171
Install VSD drives for boiler air blower controlled 551 3% $28,056
by flue monitor
Control Dissolved Oxygen content in WWTP 233 1% $11,864
and close loop blowers
MCC improvement (autamatic stop of motion if 21 0% $1,069
not required)
Reduction of Air Compressed usage in 89 0% $4,532
production (empty bags)
Close cooling tunnels ducts (open on top). 89 0% $4,532
Increase mainteinance of motors
Energy monitoring and targeting on steam
consumption install meters for key users
Monitor steam production and efficiency of the 1141 5% 19,665
boilers
Pre-heat of combustion air through effluent flue
gas economizer a)
Pre-heat of make-up water through effluent flue
gas economizer b)
Solar water heating of hot water 1744 8% 30,000
Condensate collection completion to 100% (now 496 2% 8,549
is 80%)
Coating pan water after washing: flush through a
heat exchanger to pre heat cleaning water itself
or domestic water
Improve efficiency of Boilers through correct
pressure dimensioning
Blow down of Boiler to pre-heat make-up water
Natural Gas consumption 0 0
Other fuel consumption 6,400 6,819
Total Water Consumption, m3 14,343 17,512
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 3,272 3,154 1238 46%
Indirect Emissions 2,826 2,679 New boiler installation - as est by site 1238 46%
Direct NG emisions 0 0
Other direct emissions 446 475
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 8,709 7,431
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,002 850
Waste Disposed 738 592
Waste Recycled 264 258
Total cost savings $311,019
electricity cost 7.3 PHP/KWH

1 PHG =$
0.025
Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this Does your location have the Date Started or Estimeted Date Finished or Name of the person
Capital for in 2008? approved? initiative well means of measuring the Staring Date Estimated Finish date responsible for this
costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No metric? Yes/No initiative
USD
$213,370
$213,370
$0
$63,870
$28,000
$500
$35,000
$70,000
$16,000
$213,370 Total Capital
Is this "on going" or Percent completed: Not Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative:
"one time" effort? Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, Green, Yellow, Red
Finished
Asquith
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project Estimated Energy, Percent reduction
description Water, GHGs, or from 2007
Waste Reductions
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 47159 34,064 2048 6%
Electricity consumption 29,257 22,534 factory commitment to 5% 2048
reduction in energy use.
Calc value by factory is
2048 GJ
Natural Gas consumption 17,902 11,530
Other fuel consumption 0 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 22,814 19,055 1140 6%
Municipal factory commitment to 5% 1140
reduction in water use.
1140 m3
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 7777 5,875 440 7%
Indirect Emissions 6,863 5,286 factory commitment to 5% 440
reduction in emissions.
440 CO2 equiv.
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 871 547 41.42 8%
Waste Disposed 575 290 factory commitment to 5% 41.42
reduction in waste. Calc
value by factory is 41.42
tonnes
Waste Recycled 296 257 factory commitment to
increase recycling by 10%
total cost savings

2007 values for inputs and outputs are based on
Jan- Sept data
electricity cost 0.1 AUD/KWH

water cost 0.01 AUD/gallon
1 AUD = 0.9 USD
Cost savings, Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this Does your location have the Date Started or Estimeted Date Finished or
USD Capital for in 2008? approved? initiative well means of measuring the Staring Date Estimated Finish date
costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No metric? Yes/No
USD
$54,134 0
$51,425
$2,709
$2,709
$56,843 0 Total Capital
Name of the person Is this "on going" or Percent completed: Not
responsible for this "one time" effort? Started, 25%, 50%, 75%,
initiative Finished
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this Initiative:
Green, Yellow, Red
Baddi
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Cost
Water, GHGs, or reduction savings,
Waste Reductions from 2007 USD
Inputs
Electricity consumption 15,746 15,421 Total Electrical reduction 4652 30% $116,812
1. Install overhead water storage tanks to 171 1% $4,294
eliminate cotinuous pumping in toilets and
canteen
2. Recycle vacuum pump water back to 342 2% $8,588
cooling tower
3. Replace AC plant with high efficiency 427 3% $10,722
units and close loop control
Rectify distribution lines of Compressed 72 0% $1,808
Air
Reduce leakages by installing segm. 179 1% $4,495
valves and monitoring
VSD in air compressors 628 4% $15,769
Better insulation of all building 424 3% $10,647
Better insulation of curing rooms 21 0% $527
Shading HVAC condensers 215 1% $5,399
Better mainteinance of cooling tunnel 2 53 0% $1,331
JOT
Substitute decentralized units with a new 1897 12% $47,634
centralized chilled water unit
Improve efficiency of water pumping 15 0% $377
system
Install automatic "too full" control for 1 0% $25
treated water tanks
Install electronic ballasts on 2x40 W tubes 202 1% $5,072
Complete condensate return - part B 5 0% $126

Substitute boiler with smaller more
efficient boiler
Eliminate leakages by continuous
monitoring and maint.
Complete condensate return - part A + B
(only in $ sav)
Insulate thermically the condensate tank
Solar heating of boiler make-up water
Waste heat recovery from DGs
Waste heat recovery from Incinerator
Solar water heating of process raw water
Municipal
Well 1. Install overhead water storage tanks to 18750
eliminate continuous pumping in toilets &
canteen thereby reducing the flow of
water waste. 2. Vacuum pump water to
be recycled back to spare cooling tower.
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 4,136 4,051 assume 2% reduction
Other direct emissions 2,352 2,169
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0 0
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 61 186
Waste Recycled 0 0
total savings $116,812
electricity cost: 3.6 INR/KWH

I INR = 0.025 USD
water cost unknown
Estimated Budgeted for PAR approved? Is the metric for this Does your location have the Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person
Capital in 2008? Yes/No initiative well defined? means of measuring the Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish responsible for this
costs, Yes/No Yes/No metric? Yes/No Date date initiative
USD
0
0 total capital
Is this "on going" or Percent completed: Not Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this
"one time" effort? Started, 25%, 50%, Initiative: Green, Yellow,
75%, Finished Red
Bangalore
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project Estimated Energy, Percent Cost
description Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings,
Waste Reductions 2007 USD
Inputs
Electricity consumption 7,025 7,166 1920 27% $66,960
Installation of Power factor

Controller panel to improve
the existing power factor
from 0.89 to 0.99. The
project includes design a
power factor controller,
manufacture at supplier
end and install at our site.
Other fuel consumption 11,142 12,668 .
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 1,846 1,882 assume 25% reduction 471 25%
To WWTP
To municipal
electricity cost: 5 INR/KWH
I INR = 0.025 USD
Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for this Does your location have the Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the
Capital in 2008? approved initiative well defined? means of measuring the metric? Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish person responsible
costs, Yes/No ? Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Date date for this initiative
USD
0 total capital
Is this "on going" or Percent completed: Major Issues Overall Status for this
"one time" effort? Not Started, 25%, or challenges Initiative: Green, Yellow,
50%, 75%, Finished Red
Biesheim
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project Estimated Energy, Percent Cost savings,
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 278,703 199,201
Electricity consumption 119,850 92,525
Total Water Consumption, m3 5,134,607 4,460,746 133,822 3%
Municipal
Well 4,460,746 Factory reports a 3% 133,822 water cost is
reduction goal for 2008 free
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 11,035 7,692
Indirect Emissions 2,905 2,243
Direct NG emisions 8,127 5,449
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 4,929,222 4,282,056 128,462 3%
To WWTP
To municipal assume 3% reduction in 128,462
wastewater too
Waste Disposed 2,640 2,977 Factory reports 0.9% 27
goal of waste reduction
for 2008
Waste Recycled 897 1,561
total savings 0
Estimated Budgeted for in PAR Is the metric for Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the
Capital 2008? Yes/No approved? this initiative have the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish person responsible
costs, Yes/No well defined? measuring the metric? Date date for this initiative
USD Yes/No Yes/No
0 total capital
Is this "on going" or Percent Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this
"one time" effort? completed: Not Initiative: Green,
Started, 25%, Yellow, Red
50%, 75%,
Finished
Chattanooga
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent
Water, GHGs, or reduction from
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 268,493 195,775 36434 19%
Electricity consumption 75,549 81,351 total electric reduction 6944 9%
1. Leakage control for compressed 1792 2%
air
2. Upgrade air compressor control
system
3. Heat recovery from air
compressors
4. Optimisation of compressed air 672 1%
distribution system
5. Optimisation of chilled water 4480 6%
system operation
6. Implement an energy
management system
Natural Gas consumption 192,944 114,424 Total Gas reduction 29490 26%
1. Install feedwater economisers 14557 13%
on steam boilers
2. Control excess air in steam 3586 3%
lines by managing oxygen;
3. Insulate steam valves & 2769 2%
fittings
4. Inspect and repair steam 8578 7%
traps on a regular basis
management system
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 12,137 13,676 Assume equivalent to electrical 1504 11%
reduction percent reduction in GHG -
11%
Direct NG emisions 9,912 5,845 Assume equivalent to natural gas 1052 18%
reduction percent reduction in GHG -
18%
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,132 2,223
Waste Disposed 1,443 369
Waste Recycled 689 1,854
total savings
electricity cost: USD/KWH

P2E2 study info gas cost =
Estimated
Facility Area Opportunity GJ Therms kWh Investment
Install feedwater
economisers on
Chattanooga Steam steam boilers 138,000
Control excess air
by managing
Chattanooga Steam oxygen 34,000 5,000
Insulate steam
Chattanooga Steam valves & fittings 26,250
Inspect and
repair steam
traps on a regular
Chattanooga Steam basis 81,320
Leakage control
for compressed
Chattanooga Air air 500,000
Upgrade air
compressor
Chattanooga Air control system 30,000
Heat recovery
from air
Chattanooga Air compressor 25,000
Optimisation of
compressed air
distribution
Chattanooga Air system 187,500 25,000
Optimisation of
chilled water
Chattanooga CWS system operation 1,250,000 50,000
Implement an
energy
management
Chattanooga Man system 100,000
Improve power
factor to elimate
Chattanooga Supply kVArh penalty
Cost savings, Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location Date Started or Estimeted Date Finished or
USD Capital costs, for in 2008? approved? this initiative well have the means of Staring Date Estimated Finish date
USD Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric?
Yes/No
$381,690 $145,000
$155,243 $140,000
$29,998 $0
$17,000 $30,000
$12,000 $25,000
$11,249 $25,000
$74,995 $50,000
$10,000 $10,000
$226,448 $5,000
$111,780
$5,000
$27,536
$0
$21,263
$0
$65,869
$381,690 $145,000 total capital
Projected Projected
Local Saving (local Saving
currency currency) (USD)
USD 100,000 ###
USD 15,000 $15,000
USD 11,025 $11,025
USD 35,000 $35,000
USD 28,000 $28,000
USD 17,000 $17,000

USD 12,000 $12,000
USD 10,500 $10,500
USD 70,000 $70,000
USD 100,000 ###
USD 16,800 $16,800

Name of the Is this "on going" or Percent Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for
person "one time" effort? completed: Not this Initiative: Green,
responsible for Started, 25%, Yellow, Red
this initiative 50%, 75%,
Finished
Gainesville
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Estimated
Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings, Capital
Waste Reductions 2007 USD costs,
USD
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 315,964 358,786 0 0% $61,350 0
Electricity consumption 162,692 209,198 Enthalpy Control System project for each KWH
Munters unit to provide conditioned reduction
process air to 6 Driams. This control will need to
provide 25% fresh make up outside air to quantified
the Munters and 75% re-circulated return
conditioned air. Current system provides
100% outside air which needs to be
conditioned. Result of the enthalpy
control is that the chill water load will be
reduced by 50 tons refrigeration per
Driam which totals out to 300 tons
reduced chill water load. Thusly, one
277 ton Trane Chiller Yard Unit will be
idled through out the year.
Total Water Consumption, m3 126,792 144,786 46,477 32% $61,350 0
something that accidentally got erased 2273 $3,000
Water effluent re-use 37879 $50,000
Written water conervation plan 947 $1,250
Cooling tower replace 1894 $2,500
Dishwater replacement 227 $300
Reuse base pellet cooling H20 1894 $2,500
Install driam washout controls 1136 $1,500
Upgrade washing machine 227 $300
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 26,137 33,608 Per P2E2 assessment, assume 5% total 840 3%
E savings split between electricity and
natural gas
Direct NG emisions 7,829 7,642 191 2%
To WWTP
To municipal
Waste Disposed 3,541 5,068
Waste Recycled 2,351 1,152
total savings $122,699 0
electricity cost: 0.06 USD/KWH

water cost 0.01 USD/gallon
Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on going" or Percent completed:
in 2008? approved? this initiative well the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish date responsible for this "one time" effort? Not Started, 25%,
Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date initiative 50%, 75%, Finished
Yes/No
total Capital
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for
this Initiative:
Green, Yellow,
Red
Guangzhou
description Water, GHGs, or reduction savings,
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 168,144 111,271 1925 3.0% $46,005
Electricity consumption 98,305 65,225 1. improve efficiency 1925 3.0% $44,046
on chiller system
condenser; 2. Cool
fresh air munter/chiller
systeml. Factory
estimates 2.5% energy
reduction
Total Water Consumption, m3 129,852 115,366 5999 5.2% $1,959
Municipal Reuse steam 5999 5.2% $1,959
condensate and install
low flow faucets.
Factory estimates
5.2% reduction
Well
Outputs
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 112,035 103,829 5399 5%
To WWTP Based on water
conservation, expect
5.2% reduction in
effluent
To municipal
electricity cost: 0.59 CNY/KWH

1 CNY= 0.139 USD
water cost 0.0089 CNY/gallon
Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the Is this "on Percent
Capital for in approved? initiative well defined? have the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated person responsible going" or "one completed: Not
costs, 2008? Yes/No Yes/No measuring the Date Finish date for this initiative time" effort? Started, 25%,
USD Yes/No metric? Yes/No 50%, 75%,
Finished
$140,000
$140,000
$28,000
$28,000
$168,000 total capital
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this
Initiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
Nairobi
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project description Estimated Percent reduction from 2007 Cost Estimated Budgeted for in PAR Is the metric Does your Date Date Name of the Is this "on going" Percent completed: Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for
Energy, Water, savings, Capital 2008? Yes/No approved? for this location have Started or Finished or person or "one time" Not Started, 25%, this Initiative:
GHGs, or Waste USD costs, Yes/No initiative well the means of Estimeted Estimated responsible for effort? 50%, 75%, Finished Green, Yellow, Red
Reductions USD defined? measuring the Staring Date Finish date this initiative
Yes/No metric? Yes/No
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 24,793 9,520 5% 7600
Electricity consumption 24,793 9,520 Shut offf all non needed equipment to be determined 5% of 2007 in this loss area 1000 nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept
tbd 5% of 2007 in this loss area
Isolate compressed air to departments during weekend
1000 nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept
Replace static air losses in the network by repairing tbd 5% of 2007 in this loss area
leaks 500 nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept
Isolate production areas(air conditioned) from tbd 5% of 2007 in this loss area
warehouse 1000 nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept
Introduce Day lighting for warehouse by changing roof tbd 5% of 2007 in this lossarea
type 1200 1500 No No yes No May-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Measurement per location/user dept
Other fuel consumption 0 0 tbd 2% of 2007 in this loss area
Re use munters condensate as boiler feed water
100 350 No No yes No May-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started Quantity too little
Improve oil consumption of main boilers through tbd 2% of 2007 in this loss area oil meters, chemical metering,low cost
efficient burner management 1500 No No yes No May-08 End 2008 fuel not available
Install exhaust gas economiser to the boiler tbd 2% of 2007 in this loss area 1300 6000 No Jun-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started exhaust gas quantity limitation
2,007 Insulation of all steam and hot water pipes tbd 1% of 2007 in this loss area 1000 No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started
Total Water Consumption, m3 13,519 40 1500
Municipal Seal all leak points and accurate metering tbd 2% of 2007 in this loss area 1500 nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started unreliable municipal water supply ,
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 1,813 696 0
Indirect Emissions 1,813 696 Assume reduction by 5% tbd 5% of 2007 in this loss area flue gas measurement tools,
nil No No yes No Apr-08 End 2008 Samuel /James Ongoing Not started consultancy expensive
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 0 0
To WWTP No project conceptualised this year , but intend to keep tbd 5% of 2007 in this loss area
to 2007 level nil yes No Samuel /James Ongoing Not started
To municipal
Waste Disposed 15 6 reduction in floor sugar at sheeting 50% 4000 1000
Waste Recycled 0 0
total savings 13100 9850 total capital
Electricity cost 4.4Ksh/kwh
1 Ksh= 0.0155 USD
NFI
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Estimated
description Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings, Capital
USD
Inputs
Electricity consumption 5,310 4,166 Per P2E2 assessment, 104 3% $2,615
assume 5% total E
savings split between
electricity and natural
gas
Natural Gas consumption 16,763 13,727 343 3% $2,765
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 853 669 Per P2E2 assessment, 17 3%
assume 5% total E
savings split between
electricity and natural
gas
Direct NG emisions 856 701 18 3%
To WWTP
To municipal

gas cost 0.85 USD/therm
Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on going" or Percent completed:
for in 2008? approved? this initiative well the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish responsible for this "one time" effort? Not Started, 25%,
Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date date initiative 50%, 75%, Finished
Yes/No
total capital
Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for
this Initiative: Green,
Yellow, Red
Panyu
Water, GHGs, or reduction
Waste Reductions from 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 68,341 70,164 3508 5%
Electricity consumption 36,324 35,094 Site reports 5% energy reduction target 3508
by: 1. Leakage reduction of compressed
air; 2.Steam leakage reduction;
3.Optimize environmental temp and
humidity in working area; 4.Convertor
control in air-compressor; 5.Upgrade
lights to lower engergy consumption
type; 6. Air conditioner replacement

Municipal Site reports 10% water consumption
decrease by: 1.Reuse of vacuum pump
water 150T/Day; 2.Reuse of waste water
from purity-water station to water the
plant; 3.Install sub-meter for main water
outlet to measure consumption;
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 8,627 5,978 related to energy reduction above, 390
assume same percent reduction in
indirect emissions - 5%
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 424 994 50 5%
Waste Disposed 165 598 Site reports 5% target in waste reduction by reducing the quantity
50 of gum that is destroyed
total savings
electricity cost: 0.7 CNY/KWH

1 CNY= 0.139 USD
water cost 0.01 CNY/gallon
Cost Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the
savings, Capital in 2008? approved? initiative well have the means of Estimeted Staring Date Estimated Finish person
USD costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? date responsible for
USD Yes/No this initiative
$101,144 $30,000
$95,231 $30,000
$5,913 $20,000
$20,000
$107,057 $50,000 total capital
Is this "on going" Percent Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this
or "one time" completed: Not Initiative: Green, Yellow,
effort? Started, 25%, Red
50%, 75%,
Finished
Plymouth
Water, GHGs, or reduction from
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 180,291 170,233 20,265 12%
Electricity consumption 88,186 90,029 Total electrical reduction 20265 23%
Fix Compressed air leaks 8163
Switch off all nonessential equipment when not 7156
needed and during weekends
Adjust site voltage - turn down tapings on 4946
11,000 volt transformer from 432volt 3 phase
to 420v, 3 phase
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 11,488 11,728 assume 23% reduction 2697
To WWTP
To municipal
Waste Disposed 1,448 1,830
total savings
electricity cost: 0.08 GBP/KWH

1 GBP 1.96 USD
Cost Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for Does your location Date Started or Date Finished Name of the person Is this "on
savings,USD Capital in 2008? approved? this initiative well have the means of Estimeted Staring or Estimated responsible for this going" or "one
costs, Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date Finish date initiative time" effort?
USD Yes/No
0
$886,537
$886,537 0 total capital

Percent completed: Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for
Not Started, 25%, this Initiative: Green,
50%, 75%, Finished Yellow, Red
Poznan
description Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings,
Inputs
Electricity consumption 163,601 114,825 installation of Power 3222 3% $106,884
Purge dessicant
dehumidification unit
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 30,355 21,305 639 3%
To WWTP
To municipal
Waste Disposed 522 426 Waste generation 86
reduction by 5% for
2008. Process will
consist of a
combination of
employee training and
supervision,
process/equipment
modification, better
housekeeping, and
increased waste
segregation.
electricity cost: 0.29 PLN/KWH

1 PLN 0.41 USD
Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the Is this "on going"
Capital for in approved? this initiative well the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish person responsible or "one time"
costs, 2008? Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date date for this initiative effort?
USD Yes/No Yes/No
$33,000
$33,000
Percent completed: Not Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for
Started, 25%, 50%, 75%, this Initiative:
Finished Green, Yellow, Red
Santiaga
description Water, GHGs, or reduction savings, Capital
Waste Reductions from 2007 USD costs,
USD
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 56,733 0
Electricity consumption 14,625 0
Natural Gas consumption 41,986 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 7,093 0
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 1,798
Indirect Emissions 1,562 0
To WWTP
To municipal
total savings 0 0
Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on going"
in 2008? approved? this initiative the means of measuring Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish responsible for this or "one time"
Yes/No Yes/No well defined? the metric? Yes/No Date date initiative effort?
Yes/No
total capital
Percent completed: Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this
Not Started, 25%, Initiative: Green, Yellow,
Shanghai
Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings,
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 41,293 55,466 10,594 $148,140
Electricity consumption 28,066 29,706 Total electrical reduction 10,594 $148,140
1. Install submeters on electricity and
steam pipe
2. Reduce electric consumption from
Montes Chiller operation
3. Reduce steam consumption on
jacket water system
4. Check compressed to eliminate 358 $9,739
leaks
Reduce pressure of compressed air 752 $20,289
lines
Heat recovery from air compressors 2,862 $28,405
Use high efficiency blow guns 16 $460
Minimize starting and stopping of 470 $2,001
production lines
Reduce steam generation pressure 1,923 $19,072
Split driam area into two sections 2,067 $47,209
Install feedwater economizers on 1,466 $14,202
steam boilers
Improve insulation of steam pipes, 680 $6,763
valves and fittings
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Other direct emissions 921 1,795
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 67,030 81,872 Run WWTP, reduce BOD
discharge into environment
To WWTP
To municipal
Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location have Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on going"
Capital for in approved? this initiative the means of measuring Estimeted Estimated Finish responsible for this or "one time"
costs, 2008? Yes/No well defined? the metric? Yes/No Staring Date date initiative effort?
USD Yes/No Yes/No
$102,825
$102,825
$1,082
$0
$27,052
$974
$0
$0
$16,231
$40,578
$16,908
Not Started, 25%, Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red
50%, 75%, Finished
Silao
Inputs
Electricity consumption 33,326 32,552 Total electrical reduction 1979 6% $71,375
1. Inspect and repair 268 1% $9,666
compressed air leaks
2. Use high efficiency air 14 0% $505
blow guns
3. Install additional 62 0% $2,236
receiver tank capacity
4. Implement an energy 1635 5% $58,968
management system
Natural Gas consumption 32,778 31,197 Total gas reduction 2564 8% $28,573
1. Install (feedwater) 1669 5% $18,599

economizers on steam
and hot water boilers
2. Improve insulation in 265 1% $2,953
boiler house
3. Install an automatic 630 2% $7,021
blowdown system
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 4,857 4,744 Assume equivalent 474 10%
reduction in electrical
GHG as in comsuption -
10%
Direct NG emisions 1,674 1,594 Assume equivalent 207 13%
reduction in gas GHG as
in comsuption - 13%
To WWTP
To municipal
electricity cost: 1.39 MXN/KWH

1 MXN 0.093 USD
gas cost 12.64 MXN/Therm
P2E2 Study info
Estimated Local
Facility Area Opportunity GJ Therms kWh Investment currency
Install (feedwater)
economizers on
steam and hot water
Silao Steam boilers 1669 463,611 MXN
Improve insulation in
Silao Steam boiler house 265 73,611 MXN
Install an automatic
Silao Steam blowdown system 630 175,000 MXN
Inspect and repair

Silao Air compressed air leaks 75,000 MXN
Use high efficiency air
Silao Air blow guns 3,900 MXN
Install additional
Silao Air receiver tank capacity 18,750 MXN
Implement an energy
Silao Man management system 1863 456,260 100,000 MXN
Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on
Capital in 2008? approved? initiative well defined? have the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish responsible for this going" or "one
costs, USD Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No measuring the metric? Date date initiative time" effort?
Yes/No
$9,300
$9,300
$0
$0
$0
$9,300
$0
Projected
Saving Projected
(local Saving
currency) (USD)
155,232 $14,258
24,621 $2,261
58,550 $5,378
86,250 $7,922
4,485 $412
21,563 $1,981
697,953 $64,108
Percent completed: Major Issues or challenges Overall Status
Not Started, 25%, for this Initiative:
50%, 75%, Finished Green, Yellow,
Red
St. Petersburg
Water, GHGs, or reduction savings,
Inputs
Electricity consumption 87,302 94,830 Site has not reported any projects 13,276 14% $221,725
but has reported that their goal for
2008 is to keep electricity
consumption/MSSU equal to 2007
levels. Production FOB for 2008 is
14% greater than 2007 so assume
electricity use will be reduced by
14% as well.
Natural Gas consumption 141,493 154,812 Site has not reported any projects 21,674 14% $55,852
2008 is to keep gas
gas use will be reduced by 14% as
well.
Municipal Site has not reported any projects 14,560 14% $7,880
2008 is to keep water
water use will be reduced by 14%
as well.
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 7,915 8,602 assume 14% 1204
Direct NG emisions 7,227 7,907 assume 14% 1107
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 57,611 73,771 assume 14% 10328 14%
To WWTP
To municipal
electricity cost: 1.46 RUB/KWH

1 RUB 0.041 USD
gas cost 6.63 RUB/therm
water cost 0.05 RUB/gallon
Per site, projects include:

Keep current positive trend in Energy consumption despite extensive growth of the production volume in 2008 due to 3rd stage of the Factory Expansion
Other comments:
Use high-efficiency utilities equipment,

Install manufacturing line of the new generation
Continue with various energy saving initiatives (e.g. dry coolers, timers for lighting in office etc).
Estimated Budgeted PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Date Started or Date Finished Name of the person Is this "on going" or
Capital for in approved? initiative well defined? have the means of Estimeted or Estimated responsible for this "one time" effort?
costs, 2008? Yes/No Yes/No measuring the metric? Staring Date Finish date initiative
USD Yes/No Yes/No
0
0 total capital
pansion
Percent Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for this
completed: Not Initiative: Green,
Started, 25%, Yellow, Red
50%, 75%,
Finished
Taipei
description Water, GHGs, or reduction savings, Capital
Waste Reductions from 2007 USD costs,
USD
Inputs
Electricity consumption 25,420 17,156 Isolation of area to keep 1271 7% $23,716
cool air
Total Water Consumption, m3 67,089 30,639 Leakage prevention 6709 22%
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 4,452 3,005 related to reduced 223 7%
electrical consumption,
assum 5%
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,296 805 285 35%
Waste Disposed 1,095 635 Wrapping materials reuse 285 35%
electricity cost: 2.09 TWD/KWH

1TWD 0.0321 USD
water cost ??? Free maybe
Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location have the Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the person Is this "on going"
for in 2008? approved? this initiative means of measuring the Estimeted Estimated Finish responsible for this or "one time"
Yes/No Yes/No well defined? metric? Yes/No Staring Date date initiative effort?
Yes/No
total capital
Not Started, 25%, Initiative: Green, Yellow, Red
50%, 75%, Finished
Tarazona
description Water, GHGs, or reduction from savings, Capital
USD
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 46,519 28,815
Electricity consumption 20,233 15,208
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Other direct emissions 1,831 948
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 1,452.01 0
Waste Disposed 1,338.01 0
total savings 0 0
Budgeted PAR Is the metric for Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the Is this "on going" or
for in approved? this initiative well have the means of Estimeted Staring Estimated Finish person responsible "one time" effort?
2008? Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Date date for this initiative
Yes/No Yes/No
total capital
Not Started, 25%, Initiative: Green, Yellow,
Toronto
Inputs
Electricity consumption 78,777 85,128 Total Electrical reduction 1582 2% $35,028
management system
2. Implement compressed 1201 1% $26,592
air leakage control
programme
3. Install HF ballasts 298 0% $6,598
4. Switch off LEVs during 83 0% $1,838
non-production times
Turn off lights in offices tbd
when not in use
Shut down equipment tbd
during down hours
Shut down chiller during tbd
winter
Install submeters to tbd
identify high energy use
areas and develop
reduction plans
Optimize capacity of chiller tbd
water
Install auto light switches tbd
and programmable
thermostats
Natural Gas consumption 41,365 42,663 0%
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 4,592 4,963 0%
Direct NG emisions 2,113 2,179 0%
Total Effluent Discharged, m3 43,480
To WWTP
To municipal
Waste Disposed 1,972 421 Eliminate styrofoam, cans
and bottles
Reduce paper to landfill
Eliminate use of plastics in
small ingredient prep
study ways to minimize
gum waste to landfill
Waste Recycled 1,137 408 Study recycling program to
id improvement
opportunities
Improve segregation of
wastes to optimize
recycling
Investigage recycling of
dust collector powder
electricity cost: 0.08 CAD/KWH

1 CAD 0.992 USD
P2E2 Study info
Estimated Local
Facility Area Opportunity GJ Therms kWh Investment currency
Implement an
energy
management
Toronto Man system 100,000 CND
Implement
compressed air
leakage control
Toronto Air programme 335,028 - CND
Toronto Lighting Install HF ballasts 83,080 - CND
Switch off LEVs
during non-
Toronto Process production times 23,166 - CND
Estimated Budgeted for PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the Is this "on going"
Capital in 2008? approved? initiative well have the means of Estimeted Estimated Finish person or "one time"
costs, USD Yes/No Yes/No defined? Yes/No measuring the metric? Staring Date date responsible for effort?
Yes/No this initiative
$99,200
$99,200
$99,200
$0
$0
$0
Projected
Saving Projected
(local Saving
currency) (USD)
100,000 $98,789
27,081 $26,753
6,715 $6,634
1,873 $1,850
Percent completed: Not Major Issues or challenges Overall Status for
Started, 25%, 50%, this Initiative:
75%, Finished Green, Yellow, Red
Yorkville
2005 2006 2007 2008 P2E2 project Estimated Energy, Percent Cost Estimated Budgeted
description Water, GHGs, or reduction savings, Capital for in 2008?
Waste Reductions from 2007 USD costs, Yes/No
USD
Inputs
Electricity consumption 46,976 66,754 Site reports 2008 project to 7096 11% $158,383
replace air compressor
which will save an
estimated 1.98 million kWh
- translates into 7096 GJ of
electricity saved
Natural Gas consumption 28,922 50,933 0%

Municipal
Well
Outputs
Green House Gaes, metric tones CO2 equivalents 9,024 1180 11%
Indirect Emissions 7,547 10,724 Based on electrical 1180 11%
savings, assume 11%
reduction in indirect
emissions
Direct NG emisions 1,477 2,605 0%
To WWTP
To municipal
Waste Recycled 309 2 sell dust collector $50,000 revenue
reclaimed dusts to Pullman generated
Sugar rather than giving it
to FWS
total savings $208,383 0 total capital
PAR Is the metric for this Does your location Date Started or Date Finished or Name of the Is this "on going" or "one
approved? initiative well defined? have the means of Estimeted Staring Date Estimated Finish person time" effort?
Yes/No Yes/No measuring the date responsible for
metric? Yes/No this initiative
Not Started, 25%, Initiative: Green,
50%, 75%, Finished Yellow, Red
Chicago
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 385,107
Electricity consumption 100,422
Natural Gas consumption 284,685
Other fuel consumption 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 212,417
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 16,133
Direct NG emisions 14,541
Other direct emissions 0
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 2,979
Waste Disposed 1,541
Waste Recycled 1,438
2008 P2E2 project Estimated Percent reduction
description Reduction/savings
factory closure 100

100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Dreyfus
2005 2006 2007
Inputs
Total Energy Consumption, GJ 82,711
Electricity consumption 50,921
Natural Gas consumption 31,790
Other fuel consumption 0
Total Water Consumption, m3 207,188
Municipal
Well
Outputs
Indirect Emissions 8,181
Direct NG emisions 1,631
Other direct emissions 0
To WWTP
To municipal
Total Waste Generated, metric tones 0
Waste Disposed 0
Waste Recycled 0
2008 P2E2 project Estimated Percent reduction
description Reduction/savings
factory closure 100

100
100
100
100
100
0
0
Cost savings - all values are in USD
Electrical Cost Natural Gas Other Energy Water cost Other Totals
Savings Savings Savings Savings
Asquith $51,425 $2,709 $54,134
Guangzhou $44,046 $1,959 $46,005
Panyu $95,231 $5,913 $101,144
AP
Philippines $311,019 $311,019
Shanghai $148,140 $148,140
Taipei $23,716 $23,716
total AP $684,158
Baddi $116,812 $116,812
Bangalore $66,960 $66,960
Biesheim $0
Nairobi $4,700 $2,900 $1,500 $4,000 $13,100
EMEAI Poznan $106,884 $106,884
Plymouth $886,537 $886,537
Tarazona $0
St. Petersburg $221,725 $55,852 $7,880 $285,457
Santiga
total EMEAI $1,475,749
Chattanooga $155,243 $226,448 $381,690
Gainesville $61,350 $61,350
NFI $2,615 $2,765 $5,381
Americas
Silao $71,375 $28,573 $99,948
Toronto $35,028 $35,028
Yorkville $158,383 $50,000 $208,383
Total Americas $791,779
Grand Total $2,499,838 $316,538 $0 $81,310 $54,000 $2,951,687
2006 Environmental Footprint Summary
AP
Metric Guangzhou Panyu Shanghai Taipei Antipolo City Asquith Summary
MSSU 180,433 45,070 2,605 19,421 35,220 22,423 305,172
Electricity
98,305 36,324 28,066 25,420 22,162 29,257 239,534
purchased, GJ
Natural Gas
0 0 0 0 0 17,902 17,902
purchased, GJ
Other Fuel
69,839 32,017 13,227 24,878 6,400 0 146,361
purchased, GJ
Total Energy, GJ 168,144 68,341 41,293 50,298 28,562 47,159 403,797
total Energy
0.93 1.52 15.85 2.59 0.81 2.10 1.32
GJ/MSSU
Indirect GHG
Emissions, metric
23,346 8,627 3,578 4,452 2,826 6,863 49,692
Tonnes CO2 equiv
Direct Natural Gas

GHG emissions,
0 0 0 0 0 914 914
metric tonnes CO2
equiv
Direct (other fuel)
GHG emissions,
6,892 2,230 921 1,733 446 0 12,222
metric tonnes CO2
equiv
total GHG
Emissions, metric
30,238 10,857 4,499 6,185 3,272 7,777 62,828
tonnes CO2 equiv.
Total GHG
0.17 0.24 1.73 0.32 0.09 0.35 0.21
emissions/MSSU
Water
129,852 181,100 74,478 67,089 14,343 22,814 489,676
Consumption, m3
Water con-
0.72 4.02 28.59 3.45 0.41 1.02 1.60
sumption/MSSU
Effluent
112,035 63,305 67,030 9,868 8,709 16,373 277,320
Discharged, m3
Haz waste
disposed, metric 15 37 1 0 6 0 59
tonnes
Haz waste
recyled, metric 66 4 0 5 0 37 112
tonnes
Non haz waste
disposed, metric 1,020 128 402 1,095 732 575 3,952
tonnes
Non haz waste
recycled, metric 1,413 255 196 196 264 259 2,583
tonnes
Total Waste
generated (haz +
2,514 424 599 1,296 1,002 871 6,706
Non haz), metric
tonnes
Total Waste
Recycled, metric 1,479 259 196 201 264 296 2,695
tonnes
Percent waste
59% 61% 33% 16% 26% 34% 40%
recycled
Guangzhou other fuel purchase = steam which is an indirect emission but listed under direct other for accounting purposes.
Number needs updating pending more data and/or calc
Number incorrect, pending info from site
2006 Environmental Footprint summary
EMEAI
Cafosa St. Petersburg Nairobi Plymouth Tarazona Biesheim Poznan Bangalore Baddi Summary
154,288 15,979 80,931 17,945 128,845 176,894 6,703 30,236 611,821
14,625 87,302 24,793 88,186 20,233 119,850 163,601 7,025 15,746 541,361
41,986 141,493 0 92,105 0 158,385 213,221 0 0 647,190
122 0 0 0 26,286 468 0 11,142 33,753 71,771

56,733 228,795 24,793 180,291 46,519 278,703 376,822 18,167 49,499 1,260,322
#DIV/0! 1.48 1.55 2.23 2.59 2.16 2.13 2.71 1.64 2.06
1,562 7,915 1,813 11,488 2,136 2,905 30,355 1,846 4,136 64,156
228 7,227 0 4,726 0 8,127 10,941 0 0 31,249
8 0 0 0 1,831 3 0 776 2,352 4,970
1,798 15,142 1,813 16,214 3,967 11,035 41,296 2,622 6,488 100,375
#DIV/0! 0.10 0.11 0.20 0.22 0.09 0.23 0.39 0.21 0.16
7,093 115,969 13,519 62,876 50,581 5,134,607 126,191 22,396 71,709 5,604,941
#DIV/0! 0.75 0.85 0.78 2.82 39.85 0.71 3.34 2.37 9.16
0 57,611 0 18,002 0 4,929,222 73,909 4,616 0 5,083,360
0.4 854 0 6 0.01 12 0 0 20 892
0 441 0 2 0 0 18 1 0 462
878 0 15 1,442 1,338 2,628 522 15 41 6,879
258 0 0 636 114 897 1,723 81 0 3,709
1,136 1,295 15 2,086 1,452 3,537 2,263 97 61 11,942
258 441 0 638 114 897 1,741 82 0 4,171
23% 34% 0 31% 8% 25% 77% 85% 0% 35%

sted under direct other for accounting purposes.
Americas Total
Dreyfus NFI Chicago Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville Silao Summary Summary
68,556 119,312 68,298 171,684 53,756 23,461 505,067 1,422,060
50,921 5,310 100,422 78,777 75,549 162,692 46,976 33,326 553,973 1,334,868
31,790 16,763 284,685 41,365 192,944 153,272 28,922 32,778 782,519 1,447,611
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218,132
82,711 22,073 385,107 120,142 268,493 315,964 75,898 66,104 1,336,492 3,000,611
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 5.62 1.01 3.93 1.84 1.41 2.82 2.11
8,181 853 16,133 4,592 12,137 26,137 7,547 4,857 80,437 194,285
1,631 856 14,541 2,113 9,912 7,829 1,477 1,674 40,033 72,196
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,192
9,812 1,709 30,674 6,705 22,049 33,966 9,024 6,531 120,470 283,673
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.45 0.06 0.32 0.20 0.17 0.28 0.20
207,188 3,957 212,417 57,925 138,450 126,792 25,389 40,292 812,410 6,907,027
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3.10 0.49 2.03 0.74 0.47 1.72 4.86
18,885 2,440 183,888 43,480 101,841 26,285 540 10,407 387,766 5,748,446
0 0 4 22 2 1 1 2 32 983
0 36 8 0.4 1.57 0 0.40 0 46 620
0 58 1,537 1,950 1,441 3,540 267 1,097 9,890 20,721
0 177 1,430 1,137 687 2,351 309 437 6,528 12,820
0 271 2,979 3,109 2,132 5,892 577 1,536 16,496 35,144
0 213 1,438 1,137 689 2,351 309 437 6,574 13,440
#DIV/0! 79% 48% 37% 32% 40% 54% 28% 40% 38%
AP
Metric Guangzhou Panyu Shanghai Taipei Antipolo City Asquith Summary
MSSU 0
Electricity
65,225 35,094 29,706 17,156 21,011 22,534 190,726
purchased, GJ
Natural Gas
0 0 0 0 0 11,530 11,530
purchased, GJ
Other Fuel
46,046 35,070 25,760 28,159 6,819 0 141,854
purchased, GJ
Total Energy, GJ 111,271 70,164 55,466 45,315 27,830 34,064 344,110
total Energy
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
GJ/MSSU
Indirect GHG
Emissions, metric
15,490 5,978 7,055 3,005 2,679 5,286 39,493
Tonnes CO2 equiv
Direct Natural Gas

GHG emissions,
0 0 0 0 0 589 589
metric tonnes CO2
equiv
Direct (other fuel)
GHG emissions,
4,543 1,830 1,795 1,962 475 0 10,605
metric tonnes CO2
equiv
total GHG
Emissions, metric
20,033 7,808 8,850 4,967 3,154 5,875 50,687
tonnes CO2 equiv.
Total GHG
emissions/MSSU
Water
115,366 161,135 98,972 30,639 17,512 19,055 442,679
Consumption, m3
Water con-
sumption/MSSU
Effluent
103,829 53,921 81,872 3,511 7,431 11,036 261,600
Discharged, m3
Haz waste
disposed, metric 19.26 25.00 0.71 0.00 0.24 0.00 45.21
tonnes
Haz waste
recyled, metric 128.00 0.36 0.00 0.22 0.00 25.00 153.58
tonnes
Non haz waste
disposed, metric 701.74 573.00 572.08 635.00 592.00 290.00 3,363.82
tonnes
Non haz waste
recycled, metric 1,432.58 396.00 284.00 170.00 258.00 232.00 2,772.58
tonnes
Total Waste
generated (haz +
2,281.58 994.36 856.79 805.22 850.24 547.00 6,335.19
Non haz), metric
tonnes
Total Waste
Recycled, metric 1,560.58 396.36 284.00 170.22 258.00 257.00 2,926.16
tonnes
Percent waste
68% 40% 33% 21% 30% 47% 46%
recycled
Guangzhou other fuel purchase = steam which is an indirect emission but listed under direct other for accounting purposes.
Number needs updating pending more data and/or calc
Number incorrect, pending info from site
2007 Environmental Footprint summary
EMEAI
Cafosa St. Petersburg Nairobi Plymouth Tarazona Biesheim Poznan Bangalore Baddi Summary
0
94,830 9,520 90,029 15,208 92,525 114,825 7,166 15,421 439,524
154,812 0 80,204 0 106,676 169,292 0 0 510,984
13,607 0 0 12,668 31,132 57,407

0 249,642 9,520 170,233 28,815 199,201 284,117 19,834 46,553 1,007,915
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
8,602 696 11,728 1,625 2,243 21,305 1,882 4,051 52,132
7,907 0 4,097 0 5,449 8,648 0 0 26,101
948 883 2,169 4,000
0 16,509 696 15,825 2,573 7,692 29,953 2,765 6,220 82,233
103,997 40 53,725 38,251 4,460,746 101,159 20,543 52,857 4,831,318
73,771 6,176 4,282,056 58,161 3,152 0 4,423,316
662.00 0.00 6.23 1.77 0.00 0.00 16.58 686.58
333.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.35 0.96 0.00 347.31
0.00 6.24 1,824.00 2,975.00 426.28 29.00 169.65 5,430.17
0.00 0.00 572.00 1,561.00 1,282.00 40.00 0.00 3,455.00
0.00 995.00 6.24 2,402.23 0.00 4,537.77 1,721.63 69.96 186.23 9,919.06
0.00 333.00 0.00 572.00 0.00 1,561.00 1,295.35 40.96 0.00 3,802.31
#DIV/0! 33% 0 24% #DIV/0! 34% 75% 59% 0% 38%

sted under direct other for accounting purposes.
Americas Total
Dreyfus NFI Chicago Toronto Chattanooga Gainesville Yorkville Silao Summary Summary
114,295 198,084 72,524 27,190 412,093 412,093
0 4,166 0 85,128 81,351 209,198 66,754 32,552 479,149 1,109,399
0 13,727 0 42,663 114,424 149,588 50,933 31,197 402,532 925,046
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 199,261
0 17,893 0 127,791 195,775 358,786 117,687 63,749 881,681 2,233,706
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 1.12 #DIV/0! 1.81 1.62 2.34 5.42
0 669 0 4,963 13,676 33,608 10,724 4,744 68,384 160,009
0 701 0 2,179 5,845 7,642 2,605 1,594 20,566 47,256
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,605
0 1,370 0 7,142 19,521 41,250 13,329 6,338 88,950 221,870
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.06 #DIV/0! 0.21 0.18 0.23 0.54
0 4,804 0 49,057 113,835 144,786 28,611 44,159 385,252 5,659,249
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.43 #DIV/0! 0.73 0.39 1.62 13.73
0 2,340 0 ? 59,364 51,294 174 15,236 128,408 4,813,324
0.00 0.00 0.00 8.07 1.53 3.25 0.00 2.50 15.35 747.14
0.00 41.00 0.00 0.13 1.04 0.34 1.84 0.00 44.35 545.24
0.00 50.03 0.00 413.00 367.74 5,065.00 477.00 699.00 7,071.77 15,865.76
0.00 165.17 0.00 408.00 1,852.68 1,151.96 0.00 210.70 3,788.51 10,016.09
0.00 256.20 0.00 829.20 2,222.99 6,220.55 478.84 912.20 10,919.98 27,174.23
0.00 206.17 0.00 408.13 1,853.72 1,152.30 1.84 210.70 3,832.86 10,561.33
#DIV/0! 80% #DIV/0! 49% 83% 19% 0% 23% 35% 39%

6% Energy reduction achieved through:
Compressed air management and leak detection programs -

fixing leaks, reducing loads on compressors, installing more energy efficient compressors, etc.
Chattanooga
Panyu
Plymouth 30% of our factories will implement compressed air management programs
Shanghai
Silao
Toronto
Yorkville
Steam Management - insulating valves and fitting, repairing leaks, optimizing boiler efficiencies through replacement or other means
installing meters for monitoring, etc.
Philippines
Baddi
Chattanooga 29% of our factories will implement boiler and steam efficiency programs
Panyu
Shanghai
Silao
Water Conservation via boiler condensate re-use

Philippines
Baddi
Guangzhou
Water conservation via other means

Baddi - water recycling, toilet volume reduction 30% of our factories will reduce water consumption
Biesheim - method not given
Gainesville - effluent reuse, water urinals, cooling water reuse, cooling tower replacement
Guangzhou - installation of low flow faucets
Panyu - reuse vacuum pump water, installation of meters, reuse of water for irrigation
Taipei - institute a water pipe leakage program
Waste Reduction -
Asquith - method not given 25% of our factories will reduce waste
Biesheim - increasing recycling rates
Poznan - process/equipment modification, employee training and awareness, better housekeeping, better waste segregation
Taipei - better re-use of wrapping materials
Yorkville - reducing rolling compound usage and better segreation of waste materials to facilitate greater recycling

2008 E Footprint Accouting 3-14-08

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

2008 E Footprint Accouting 3-14-08

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

All Sites

3% $993,421 $33,000 27,692 8% $673,577 $486,195

electricity cost 7.3 PHP/KWH

total cost savings

electricity cost 0.1 AUD/KWH

Complete condensate return - part B 5 0% $126

electricity cost: 3.6 INR/KWH

Installation of Power factor

electricity cost: USD/KWH

USD 100,000 ###

USD 15,000 $15,000

USD 11,025 $11,025

USD 35,000 $35,000

USD 28,000 $28,000

USD 17,000 $17,000

USD 10,500 $10,500

USD 70,000 $70,000

USD 100,000 ###

USD 16,800 $16,800

electricity cost: 0.06 USD/KWH

electricity cost: 0.59 CNY/KWH

electricity cost: 0.09 USD/KWH

Natural Gas consumption 0 0

electricity cost: 0.7 CNY/KWH

electricity cost: 0.08 GBP/KWH

$886,537 0 total capital

electricity cost: 0.29 PLN/KWH

1. Install (feedwater) 1669 5% $18,599

electricity cost: 1.39 MXN/KWH

Inspect and repair

electricity cost: 1.46 RUB/KWH

Per site, projects include:

Use high-efficiency utilities equipment,

electricity cost: 2.09 TWD/KWH

electricity cost: 0.08 CAD/KWH

Natural Gas consumption 28,922 50,933 0%

factory closure 100

factory closure 100

Direct Natural Gas

41,986 141,493 0 92,105 0 158,385 213,221 0 0 647,190

122 0 0 0 26,286 468 0 11,142 33,753 71,771

228 7,227 0 4,726 0 8,127 10,941 0 0 31,249

8 0 0 0 1,831 3 0 776 2,352 4,970

0 57,611 0 18,002 0 4,929,222 73,909 4,616 0 5,083,360

0.4 854 0 6 0.01 12 0 0 20 892

878 0 15 1,442 1,338 2,628 522 15 41 6,879

258 0 0 636 114 897 1,723 81 0 3,709

1,136 1,295 15 2,086 1,452 3,537 2,263 97 61 11,942

258 441 0 638 114 897 1,741 82 0 4,171

23% 34% 0 31% 8% 25% 77% 85% 0% 35%

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.45 0.06 0.32 0.20 0.17 0.28 0.20

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! 3.10 0.49 2.03 0.74 0.47 1.72 4.86

0 36 8 0.4 1.57 0 0.40 0 46 620

0 58 1,537 1,950 1,441 3,540 267 1,097 9,890 20,721

0 177 1,430 1,137 687 2,351 309 437 6,528 12,820

0 271 2,979 3,109 2,132 5,892 577 1,536 16,496 35,144

0 213 1,438 1,137 689 2,351 309 437 6,574 13,440

Direct Natural Gas

154,812 0 80,204 0 106,676 169,292 0 0 510,984

13,607 0 0 12,668 31,132 57,407

8,602 696 11,728 1,625 2,243 21,305 1,882 4,051 52,132

7,907 0 4,097 0 5,449 8,648 0 0 26,101

948 883 2,169 4,000