Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RESEARCH PAPER
Keywords
Agave marmorata; cyanobacteria; mosses;
Neobuxbaumia tetetzo; Prosopis laevigata;
Tehuacan-Cuicatlan Valley.
Correspondence
H. Godnez-Alvarez, UBIPRO, FES Iztacala,
UNAM. Av. de los Barrios 1, Los Reyes
Iztacala, Tlalnepantla 54090, Ap. Postal 314,
Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
E-mail: hgodinez@campus.iztacala.unam.mx
Editor
M. Riederer
Received: 21 February 2011; Accepted: 11
June 2011
doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00495.x
ABSTRACT
Information about the effects of biological soil crusts (BSC) on germination, seedling survival and growth of vascular plants is controversial because they can have
positive, neutral or negative effects. This controversy may be because most studies
conducted until now have just analysed one or two recruitment stages independently. To understand the BSC effects on vascular plants, it is necessary to consider
each stage of the recruitment process and synthesise all this information. The goal
of this study was twofold. First, we analyse germination, seedling survival and
growth of three vascular plants (Agave marmorata, Prosopis laevigata and Neobuxbaumia tetetzo) on BSC (cyanobacteria and mixed crust) from a tropical desert
region of south-central Mexico. Second, we synthesise the information to determine
the total effect of BSC on plant species performance. We conducted experiments
under controlled conditions to evaluate the proportion of germinated seeds, proportion of surviving seedlings and seedling dry weight in BSC and bare soil. Results
showed that BSC have different effects on germination, seedling survival and
growth of plant species. Plant species performance was qualitatively higher on BSC
than bare soil. The highest performance of A. marmorata and P. laevigata was
observed on cyanobacteria and mixed crusts, respectively. The highest performance
INTRODUCTION
Germination, seedling survival and growth are main stages in
the population recruitment process of vascular plants (Harper
1977). The success of each of these stages depends on biotic
(e.g. abundance of seed predators, herbivores and competitors) and abiotic (e.g. light, water and nutrient availability)
factors existing in the microhabitats where seeds were dispersed (Schupp 1995, 2007; Schupp & Fuentes 1995). These
microhabitats, however, may differ in their suitability for seed
germination, seedling survival and growth (Schupp 2007).
For example, the most suitable microhabitats for germination
may be unsuitable for seedling survival or seedling growth.
The study of microhabitat effects on each recruitment stage
is essential to understand population recruitment patterns
and plant species performance.
Biological soil crusts (BSC) are assemblages of cyanobacteria, green algae, fungi, mosses and lichens growing over the
soil surface that affect seed germination, seedling survival and
seedling growth (Belnap & Lange 2003). Information about
the effect of BSC on these recruitment stages is controversial
because they can have positive, neutral or negative effects,
depending on the stage, plant species and crust type (St. Clair
et al. 1984; Zaady et al. 1997; Evans & Johansen 1999; Belnap
& Lange 2003; Escudero et al. 2007). This controversy may
be due to the fact that most of the studies conducted until
now have just analysed one or two recruitment stages independently (St. Clair et al. 1984; Zaady et al. 1997; Pendleton
et al. 2003; Hawkes 2004; Li et al. 2005; Rivera-Aguilar et al.
2005; Escudero et al. 2007; Su et al. 2007, 2009; Beysch-
Plant Biology 14 (2012) 157162 2011 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
157
lar plants, Mimosa luisana and Myrtillocatus geometrizans (Rivera-Aguilar et al. 2005). To fulfil our goal, we conducted
experiments under controlled conditions to evaluate the proportion of germinated seeds, proportion of surviving seedlings and seedling dry weight in BSC and bare soil. Although
the information on BSC effects on vascular plants is controversial, we expect higher germination, seedling survival and
growth on crusts than bare soil. Similarly, we expect higher
plant species performance on crusts than bare soil.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Biological soil crusts, bare soil and seed collection
Performance of each plant species was calculated as the product of the proportion of germinated seeds, proportion of surviving seedlings and seedling dry weight on the two crust
types and bare soil. All factors were considered equally
important, hence we did not conduct any weighting.
Statistical analysis
The proportion of germinated seeds, T50, proportion of surviving seedlings and seedling dry weight of each plant species
were analysed with one-way anova to determine whether
there were significant differences among treatments. The proportion of germinated seeds and proportion of surviving
seedlings were normalised using angular transformation. Differences among treatments were detected with Tukeys HSD
test. All analyses were conducted with spss, version 9.0 (SPSS
1998).
Data for dry weight of P. laevigata seedlings were not normally distributed, hence they were analysed with a randomisation test for a one-way anova. This test was conducted
with EcoSim, version 7.0 (Gotelli & Entsminger 2001).
RESULTS
Germination
Plant Biology 14 (2012) 157162 2011 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
100
(a)
1.0 (a)
80
60
0.8
ab
0.6
40
b
20
0.4
0.2
0
2
(b)
40
30
20
10
0
0
0
Seedling survival (proportion)
Germination (%)
0.7 (b)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1.0 (c)
(c)
100
0.8
80
0.6
60
0.4
40
0.2
20
0
0
4
6
Time (days)
10
Fig. 1. Germination (mean 1 SE) of Agave marmorata (a), Prosopis laevigata (b) and Neobuxbaumia tetetzo (c) on cyanobacteria crust (diamonds), mixed crust (squares) and bare soil (triangles). For each species,
letters indicate significant differences among treatments (P < 0.05).
A. marmorata on cyanobacteria crust and bare soil germinated in 4.8 0.3 and 5.5 0.3 days, respectively. These
differences were not statistically significant (t = 1.73, df = 6,
P = 0.13). Germination on mixed crust was <50%. Seeds of
N. tetetzo on mixed crust tended to germinate faster
(1.8 0.3 days) than on cyanobacteria crust (3.5 1.2 days)
and bare soil (3.8 1.1 days). However, these differences
were not statistically significant (F = 0.91, df = 2, 8,
P = 0.44). T50 for P. laevigata could not be analysed because
germination was <50% in all treatments.
Seedling survival and growth
0
Cyanobacteria crust
Mixed crust
Treatment
Bare soil
Plant Biology 14 (2012) 157162 2011 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
159
18 (a)
Agave marmorata
15
12
9
Mixed crust
Bare soil
Germination
0.72
0.30
0.53
Survival
0.94
0.92
0.57
Growth
15.76
8.01
3.63
Performance
10.67
2.21
1.10
6
3
0
1.2 (b)
Cyanobacteria crust
0.9
0.6
Prosopis laevigata
Cyanobacteria crust
Mixed crust
Bare soil
Germination
0.28
0.25
0.28
Survival
0.27
0.42
0.42
Growth
0.27
0.88
0.35
Performance
0.02
0.09
0.04
0.3
0
18 (c)
15
12
b
9
6
Neobuxbaumia tetetzo
3
0
Cyanobacteria crust
Mixed crust
Treatment
Cyanobacteria crust
Mixed crust
Bare soil
Germination
0.72
0.79
0.63
Survival
0.96
1.00
0.93
Growth
15.04
12.22
6.83
Performance
10.39
9.65
4.00
Bare soil
Fig. 4. Plant species performance on two crust types and bare soil. Performance was calculated as the product of proportion of germinated
seeds, proportion of surviving seedlings and seedling dry weight in each
treatment. Boxes with bold lines indicate the highest significant values in
each row.
Plant Biology 14 (2012) 157162 2011 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
Plant Biology 14 (2012) 157162 2011 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
161
162
Plant Biology 14 (2012) 157162 2011 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands