Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
QAQC Numbe
Basic Info
Basic Info
Basic Info
Project name
Those interviewed Organization of interviewees
Green Village Credit
Huang Yaqin
TNC China
China Rural Energy
Enterprises Development
(CREED)
1
Jengi Initiative
Leonard Usongo
Northern Savannah
Project
Leonard Usongo
WWF CARPO
Coastal Forest
Programme
Leonard Usongo
WWF CARPO
Leonard Usongo
WWF CARPO
Robert M. Findling
TNC
Rich Reiner
TNC
Laguna Madre
Sonia Najera
TNC
Nora Berrahmouni
WWF Mediterranean
Florida Ranchlands
Environmental Services
Project (FRESP)
Sarah Lynch
WWF
Steve MacLean
TNC
10
11
Jerry Chen
TNC
Alternative Energy
Program
Wang Shuwen
TNC China
Community Based
Natural Resource
Management
Chris Weaver
WWF
Julianne Stockbridge
TNC
12
13
14
15
Oyster Habitat
Enhancement at
Woodard Bay
(submerged lands)
Betsy Lyons
TNC
Oyster Habitat
Enhancement at Frye
Cove
Betsy Lyons
TNC
Green River
Richard Kessler
TNC
Sam Pearsall
TNC
16
17
18
19
William J. Ginn
TNC
Barry Truitt
TNC
Santa Fe Watershed
Ecosystem Service
Laura McCarthy
TNC
20
21
22
Laojunshan Conservation Yanfang (Angela) Cun
Education Pride
Campaign
TNC
TNC
23
24
Obed Lense
Maricaban Conservation
Trust Fund
Ricardo Sandalo
WWF
25
Economic Instruments for Dr. T R Manoharan
Managing Forest
Ecosystem Services in
India
WWF-India
WWF-MedPO
26
27
Alessandro Badalotti
Esteban Brenes
Virginia Reyes
WWF-Central America
Stuart Blanch
WWF-Australia
EPWS (Equitable
Payment for Watershed
Services)
Christine Wulandari
WWF
Michael Becker
WWF-Brasil
28
29
30
31
John Manul
WWF-Philippines
Johnjoe Cantos
WWF-Philippines
Johnjoe Cantos
WWF-Philippines
David Lindley
WWF-South Africa
32
33
34
35
Cheryl Gole
WWF-Australia
Petro Masolwa
WWF-Tanzania (WWFTPO)
Ed Tongson
WWF
36
37
38
WWF
Woodland Watch
(Northern Agricultural
Region)
Chris Curnow
WWF-Australia
Healthy Ecosystems
(Avon)
Chris Curnow
WWF-Australia
39
40
41
Fabian Musila
WWF-EARPO
Seaturtle Bycatch
Miguel Jorge
WWF
Miguel Jorge
WWF
42
43
44
Meneses Roberto
WWF-Mozambique
Coordination Office
(MCO)
Wetlands Alliance
Yumiko Yasuda
WWF-Greater Mekong
45
46
Natural Eco-Tourism in Xe Paul Eshoo
Pian National Protected
Area
47
WWF
Achmad Rizal
TNC
Marine Conservation
Programs in Komodo
National Park
48
49
Biodiversity Conservation Barney Long
Corridors Initiative
50
TNC
Ryan Smith
TNC
Tresor Rainforest
Reserve
Dominiek Plouvier
WWF - Guianas
51
52
53
WWF - Philippines
Community-Based
Carlos Drews
Conservation of Marine
Turtles and Other Natural
Resources on Chiriqu
Beach
WWF
Abatement of egg
poaching in a Pacific
leatherback nesting site,
Junquilla Beach
WWF
54
55
56
Carlos Drews
Improving Natural
Resources Use on the
Eastern Side of
Udzungwa Mountains
National Park
Zakiya M. Aloyce
WWF - Tanzania
David Walker
John Y. Salehe
WWF - EARPO
57
58
59
Isaac Malugu
WWF - Tanzania
60
Indus For All Programme Ali Dehlavi
WWF - Pakistan
Sustainable Rattan
Harvest and Production
WWF
61
62
Thibault Ledecq
Conservation and
Sustainable Use of the
Marine and Coastal
Biodiversity of the
Bismarck-Solomon Seas
(PNG)
Luanne Losi
WWF
Conservation and
Sustainable Use of the
Marine and Coastal
Biodiversity of the
Bismarck-Solomon Seas
Papua, Indonesia
Creusa Hitipeuw
WWF
Model of Sustainable
Community - Kashima
City
Naobi Okayasu
WWF Japan
63
64
65
Addressing water
pollution in the Tri An
reservoir and the lower
Dong Nai
Jacob Fjalland
WWF
Development of
Quirimbas National Park
Sean Nazerali
WWF - SARPO
Advance Sustainable
Fisheries in Cuba
Jose L. Gerhartz
WWF - Canada
66
67
68
Peter Sumbi
WWF - Tanzania
69
Securing and Establishing Mark E. Grindley
Sustainable Management
of Forest Assets for
Ethnic Minorities in
Quang Tri Province
WWF - Vietnam
TNC
70
71
Sally R. Palmer
Living Rhone
Dani Heusser
WWF - Switzerland
Sierra de Lacandon
National Park
Rudy Herrara
TNC - Guatemala
72
73
Biodiversity Conservation Bas van Helvoort
Corridors Initiative
(Cambodia: Eastern
Plains Biodiversity
Corridor)
74
Elias Kimaru
WWF - Kenya
Community-Based
Natural Resources
Management in Niassa
Reserve
Papucides Ntela
WWF Mozambique
75
76
Donsol Community Based Ruel Pine
Ecotourism Development
Project
77
WWF-Philippines
Niel Makinuddin
TNC Indonesia
Michael Baltzer
WWF
WWF
WWF
78
79
80
81
Michael Baltzer
WWF
WWF
Maya Forest
TNC
82
83
84
Ann Snook
WWF Mexico
Silvia Benitez
TNC
Silvia Benitez
TNC
David Braun
TNC
85
86
87
88
George Schuler
TNC
Guaraquecaba
Fernando Veiga
Environmental Protection Giba Tiepolo
Area - Carbon project
TNC
Cosumnes River
Jaymee Marty
Ramona Swenson
Mike Eaton
TNC
Silvia Benitez
Pablo Lloret
TNC
FONAG
89
90
91
93
Ecological ICMS
Fernando Veiga
Giba Tiepolo
TNC
Water law
Fernando Veiga
Giba Tiepolo
TNC
Forest cover
Fernando Veiga
Giba Tiepolo
TNC
Fernando Veiga
Giba Tiepolo
TNC
TNC
95
96
97
98
99
Eric Wold
Ed Alverson
Nestor Sanchez
TNC
Alejandro Martinez
TNC
alejandro_martinez@tnc.
org
La Amistad/Banano and
Bananito Streams
Felipe Carazo
100
102
103
107
TNC
Illinois River
Jim
Jason
Tharran Hobson
TNC
Catskills
Alan White
TNC
Pawcatuck Borderlands
Kevin Essington
Nick Napoli
Rick Pace
TNC
EcoAsset Markets
Highlands
Tom Wells
TNC
Oscar Nunez
Fundacion Defensores de
la Naturaleza
TNC
111
112
113
114
115
Joerg Seifert-Granzin
Fundacion de Amigos de
la Naturaleza (FAN)
TNC
Agroforestry
Fernando Veiga
GIba Tiepolo
TNC
Midwest Reforestation
John Shuey
TNC
Richard Martin
TNC
116
117
118
119
Penobscot River
Tom Rumpf
TNC
Lee Moore
TNC
Amboro-Carrasco
Conservation Unit
Cole Genge
TNC
Atitlan Volcanoes
Jorge Cardona
TNC
121
122
123
124
TNC
TNC
Pacaya-Samiria National
Reserve
Sandra Isola
TNC
Shellfish Restoration
Network
Rob Brumbaugh
TNC
126
127
129
135
Emas/Cerrado
Glauco Freitas
TNC
Bahia Kino
Jorge Torre
COBI (Comunidad y
Biodiversidad)
Chiapas Coastal
Watershed
Alejandro Hernandez
TNC
154
158
159
Basic Info
Date of interview
9 July, 2007
Basic Info
Main Project Contact
Huang Yaqin
Xia Zuzhang (point
person)
Basic Info
Project location
China
Basic Info
Project ecoregion
Northwest Yunnan
July 9, 2007
July 17, 2007
Leonard Usongo
Cameroon
Cameroon
Northern Sudanian
Savanna
Dr Atanga Ekobo
Cameroon
Leonard Usongo
Cameroon
24 July, 2007
Robert M. Findling
North America
Apache Highlands
24 July, 2007
Rich Reiner
North America
Sacramento/Central
Valley
24 July, 2007
Sonia Najera
Gulf Coast
16 July, 2007
Nora Berrahmouni
Sarah Lynch
North America
Lake Okeechobee
watershed
26 July, 2007
Steve MacLean
North America
Bering Sea
11 July, 2007
Jerry Chen
China
17 July, 2007
Wang Shuwen
China
1 August 2007
Chris Weaver
Namibia
Namibia
1 August 2007
6 August 2007
Juilanne Stockbridge
Belize
7 August, 2007
Betsy Lyons
North America
7 August, 2007
Betsy Lyons
North America
Puget Sound
14 August, 2007
Richard Kessler
North America
17 August, 2007
Sam Pearsall
North America
18 October, 2007
William J. Ginn
Alabama, Arkansas,
Florida, Georgia,
Louisiana, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South
Carolina, Tennessee,
Virginia, Wisconsin
17 August, 2007
Barry Truitt
North America
Virginia Coast
7 August, 2007
Laura McCarthy
North America
Southern Rockies
22 August, 2007
Angela Cun
China
Laojunshan Mountain
Range
28 August, 2007
Obed Lense
Indonesia
Papua
4 August, 2007
Ricardo Sandalo
Philippines
Sulawesi Marine
29 August, 2007
6 September, 2007
T R Manoharan
India
10 September, 2007
Alessandro Badalotti
Montenegro
Dinaric Alps,
Mediterranean
29 August, 2007
Esteban Brenes
Guatemala
Mesoamerican Caribbean
Reef
10 September, 2007
Stuart Blanch
Australia
Northern Territory
Australia
10 September, 2007
Indonesia
13 September, 2007
Michael Becker
Brasil
Atlantic Rainforest
13 September, 2007
John Manul
Philippines
Sulu-Sulawesi Marine
13 September, 2007
Johnjoe Cantos
Philippines
Sulu-Sulawesi Marine
13 September, 2007
Johnjoe Cantos
Philippines
Sulu-Sulawesi Marine
17 September, 2007
David Lindley
South Africa
South Africa
18 September, 2007
Cheryl Gole
Australia
Southwest Australia
18 September, 2007
Petro Masolwa
Tanzania
Southwestern Tanzania
(river connected to
Miombo and E. African
Marine ecoregions)
24 September, 2007
Ed Tongson
Philippines
Sulu-Sulawesi
23 August, 2007
Catherine Traynor
South Africa
None Reported
19 August, 2007
Chris Curnow
Australia
Southwest Australia
19 August, 2007
Chris Curnow
Australia
Southwest Australia
2 September, 2007
Fabian Musila
Kenya
1 Ocotober, 2007
Moises Mug
1 October, 2007
Miguel Jorge
Global
Global
3 October, 2007
Meneses Roberto
Mozambique
4 October, 2007
Yumiko Yasuda
Robert Mather
Greater Mekong
4 October, 2007
Paul Eshoo
Lao PDR
Mekong River
6 September, 2007
Achmad Rizal
Indonesia
Central Sulawesi
28 August, 2007
Indonesia / Nusa
Tenggara Timur
8 October, 2007
Barry Long
Vietnam
Lao
Greater Anamites
27 August, 2007
Indonesia
Papua
9 October, 2007
Ryan Smith
Texas, USA
10 October, 2007
Dominiek Plouvier
French Guiana
10 October, 2007
Marivel Dygico
Philippines
Sulu-Sulawesi Seas
11 October, 2007
Claudia Ruiz
Panama
Caribbean Marine
10 October, 2007
Claudia Ruiz
Costa Rica
Caribbean Marine
22 August, 2007
Zakiya M. Aloyce
Tanzania
1 October, 2007
David Walker
Australia
None Reported
18 October, 2007
John Y. Salehe
16 October, 2007
Isaac Malugu
John Y. Salehe
Tanzania
20 October, 2007
Ali Dehlavi
Pakistan
22 October, 2007
Thibault Ledecq
Lao PDR
Cambodia
Vietnam
Mekong River
23 October, 2007
Luanne Losi
29 October, 2007
Creusa Hitipeuw
Luanne Losi
Papua
Solomon Seas
18 October, 2007
Naobi Okayasu
Japan
Ariake Sea
9 October, 2007
Jacob Fjalland
Viet Nam
Southern Anamites
28 October, 2007
Sean Nazerali
Mozambique
1 November, 2007
Jose L. Gerhartz
Cuba
Caribbean Sea
1 November, 2007
Peter Sumbi
John Salehe
Tanzania
4 November, 2007
Mark E. Grindley
Vietnam
Greater Mekong
7 August, 2007
Leslie Colley
Sally R. Palmer
Tennessee, USA
5 November, 2007
Dani Heusser
Switzerland
Alps
12 November, 2007
Rudy Herrara
Guatemala
Maya Forest
12 November, 2007
Cambodia
6 November, 2007
Elias Kimaru
Kenya
6 November, 2007
Papucides Ntela
Mozambique
None Reported
8 October, 2007
Ruel Pine
Philippines
Sulu-Sulawesi Marine
29 August, 2007
Niel Makinuddin
Indonesia
None Reported
18 September, 2007
Michael Baltzer
Romania
Carpathian Mountains
18 September, 2007
Michael Baltzer
Romania
Carpathian Mountains
18 September, 2007
Michael Baltzer
Romania
Ukraine
Moldavia
Bulgaria
Lower Danube
10 September, 2007
Tri Agung
Lombok (west
Kalimantan), Eastern
Nussa Tengara (Timor),
Kapuas Hulu (Borneo)
Indonesia
5 September, 2007
Jason Rubens
Tanzania
2 August, 2007
Ann Snook
Mexico
None Reported
16 September, 2007
Eugenio Barrios
Mexico
Chihuahua Desert
Pacific coast Dry Forest
Durango and Nayarit
8 August, 2007
Silvia Benitez
Ecuador
None Reported
8 August, 2007
Silvia Benitez
Ecuador
None Reported
29 November 2006
None Reported
Iowa
North America
None Reported
29 Nov 2006
George Schuler
New York
North America
29 Nov 2006
16 Feb 2007
None Reported
Brazil
South America
None Reported
7 Nov 2006
None Reported
California
North America
None Reported
30 Nov 2006
Silvia Benitez
Pablo Lloret
Ecuador
South America
29 Nov 2006
16 Feb 2007
None Reported
Brazil
South America
None Reported
29 Nov 2006
16 Feb 2007
Fernando Veiga
Brazil
South America
None Reported
29 Nov 2006
16 Feb 2007
None Reported
Brazil
South America
None Reported
29 Nov 2006
16 Feb 2007
None Reported
Brazil
South America
None Reported
10 January 2007
Molly Ingraham
Washington
North America
North Cascades
11 January 2007
12 January 2007
None Reported
Oregon
North America
Willamette Valley/Puget
Trough/Georgia Basin
(WPG)
14 February 2007
None Reported
Dominican Republic
Central America
None Reported
13 Feb 2007
None Reported
Belize
Central America
Maya Forest
14 May 2007
None Reported
None Reported
22 January 2007
None Reported
24 January 2007
Illinois
North America
None Reported
New York
North America
Allegheny Plateau
25 January 2007
23 January 2007
None Reported
Connecticut
Rhod Island
North America
26 January 2007
None Reported
New Jersey
North America
14 February 2007
None Reported
Guatemala
Central America
None Reported
15 February 2007
None Reported
Bolivia
South America
None Reported
16 Feb 2007
None Reported
Brazil
South America
None Reported
7 March 2007
None Reported
Indiana
Ohio
North America
16 March 2007
None Reported
Louisiana
North America
22 March 2007
None Reported
Maine
North America
20 March 2007
None Reported
None Reported
30 May 2007
None Reported
Bolivia
South America
16 May 2007
None Reported
Guatemala
Central America
None Reported
3 July 2007
None Reported
Mexico
Central America
Chihuahuan desert
30 May 2007
None Reported
Bolivia
South America
None Reported
21 May 2007
None Reported
Peru
South America
None Reported
2 April 2007
None Reported
Throughout US
North America
None Reported
21 May 2007
None Reported
Brazil
South America
23 May 2007
Jorge Torre
Baja California Sur
Marianne Kleiberg (TNC) Mexico
Central America
None Reported
15 June 2007
None Reported
None Reported
Mexico
Central America
Tropical Grassland
Savanna
Basic Info
Start date
Oct 2004
Basic Info
Basic Info
Expected project length
Project category
July 2009
Ecosystem services
Basic Info
Interview type
By phone
1998
Ecosystem services
By phone
1996
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
1994-5
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
1990
Perpetuity
Ecosystem services
By phone
1997
2018
Ecosystem services
By phone
1990s
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
July 2004
2009
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
6 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
2000
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1992
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1998
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
2015
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
2011
Ecosystem services
By phone
1999
perpetual
Ecosystem services
By phone
None Reported
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
3-5 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
perpetual
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
June 2006
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
January 2007
1 year
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
5 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
Perpetual
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1991
Perpetual
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
2007
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
1998
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
September 2006
1 year
Ecosystem services
By phone
2000
June 2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
June 2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
2001
2008
2005
2007
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
Ecosystem services
By phone
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
2009
Ecosystem services
By phone
1992
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1995
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
October 2006
2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1990
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1995
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1997
2012
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
January 2006
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
2001
2007
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
2025
Ecosystem services
By phone
1996
2009
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
2012
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
2011
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
2009
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
2009
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
2009
Ecosystem services
By phone
2001
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
2009
Ecosystem services
By phone
1990
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
2010
Ecosystem services
By phone
2001
2008
Ecosystem services
By phone
2001
2007
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2006
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
None Reported
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2005
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1990
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2007
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
7 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
None Reported
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
None Reported
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
June 1995
ongoing
Ecosystem services
In person
2000
40 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
1984
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
1997
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
1992
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
1997
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
2001
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
None Reported
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
2007
Perpetual
Ecosystem services
In person
1992
Perpetual
Ecosystem services
In person
2001
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
1995
40 years
Ecosystem services
In person
2003
perpetual
Ecosystem services
In person
1998
Perpetuity
2003
Ecosystem services
In person
Ecosystem services
In person
2006
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
2007
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
1990
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
1997
30 years
Ecosystem services
In person
None Reported
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
2002
40 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
100 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
None Reported
Ecosystem services
In person
2006
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1997
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2001
perpetual
Ecosystem services
In person
2004
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2003
Ended 2004
Ecosystem services
By phone
None Reported
5 years
Ecosystem services
By phone
2004
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
2000
Ecosystem services
By phone
2002
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
1998
None Reported
Ecosystem services
By phone
Basic Info
Interviewer
Melissa Uhl
Rationale
Broad threats
Overharvest
Rationale
Main threats
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Logging
Housing and urban development
Hunting
Energy production and mining
Roads and service corridors
Species stresses
Fragmentation; degradation
NTFPs
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Hunting
Tourism and Recreation development
Logging
Fragmentation; degradation
Recreational activities
Non-timber crops (ag)
Fishing
Non-point pollution
Ranching
Logging
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Invasive Species
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Invasive Species
Climate Change
Overharvest
Fragmentation; degradation
Watershed alteration
Dam and water management
Non-timber crops (ag)
Logging
Housing and urban development
Invasive species
Climate change and severe weather
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Invasive Species
Climate Change
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Climate Change
Fire
Climate change and severe weather
Housing and urban development
Wood and pulp plantations
Logging
Non-timber crops (ag)
Other
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Climate Change
Invasive Species
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Fishing
Invasive species
Climate change and severe weather
Housing and urban development
Commercial and industrial development
Energy production and mining
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Logging
Housing and urban development
Tourism and Recreation development
Melissa Uhl
Climate Change
Overharvest
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Watershed alteration
Dam and water management
Commercial and industrial development
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Pollution
Fishing
Non-point pollution
Aquaculture
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Fire
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Hunting
Logging
Housing and urban development
Tourism and Recreation development
Fragmentation; degradation
Energy production and mining
Roads and service corridors
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Fishing
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Overharvest
Fishing
Tourism and Recreation development
Non-point pollution
Housing and urban development
Commercial and industrial development
Recreational activities
Shipping lanes
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Logging
Hunting
Housing and urban development
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Invasive Species
Climate Change
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Non-point pollution
Point pollution
Logging
Non-timber crops (ag)
Energy production and mining
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Invasive Species
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Recreational activities
Point pollution
Non-point pollution
Fishing
Housing and urban development
Commercial and industrial development
Tourism and Recreation development
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Logging
Other
Tourism and Recreation development
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Overharvest
Invasive Species
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Invasive Species
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Overharvest
Ranching
Logging
Non-point pollution
Non-timber crops (ag)
Fragmentation; degradation
Species stresses
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Fishing
Other
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Fishing
Other
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Fishing
Dam and water management
Energy production and mining
Non-timber crops (ag)
Tourism and Recreation development
Housing and urban development
Roads and service corridors
Fragmentation; degradation
Non-point pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Fire
Tourism and Recreation development
Logging
Housing and urban development
Non-timber crops (ag)
Hunting
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Pollution
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Fishing
Species stresses
Fragmentation; degradation
Hunting
Logging
Other
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Logging
Hunting
Energy production and mining
Dam and water management
Other
NTFPs
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Fishing
Recreational activities
Fragmentation; degradation
Shipping lanes
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Invasive Species
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Climate Change
Hunting
Other
Climate change and severe weather
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Fishing
Recreational activities
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Hunting
Fishing
Housing and urban development
Climate change and severe weather
Melissa Uhl
Climate Change
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Overharvest
Fragmentation; degradation
Watershed alteration
Fire
Logging
Climate change and severe weather
Melissa Uhl
Invasive Species
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Fire
Logging
NTFPs
Non-timber crops (ag)
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Climate Change
Invasive Species
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
NTFPs
Logging
Non-timber crops (ag)
Fragmentation; degradation
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Fishing
Point pollution
Non-point pollution
Commercial and industrial development
Energy production and mining
Logging
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Overharvest
Pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Hunting
Fishing
Logging
Fire
Fragmentation; degradation
Other
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Fragmentation; degradation
Tourism and Recreation development
Fishing
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Invasive Species
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Fishing
Tourism and Recreation development
Recreational activities
Other
Non-point pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Fire
Logging
Wood and pulp plantations
Non-timber crops (ag)
Fragmentation; degradation
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Melissa Uhl
Overharvest
Fishing
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Melissa Uhl
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Fire
Ranching
Non-timber crops (ag)
Point pollution
Non-point pollution
Melissa Uhl
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Rebecca Goldman
Pollution
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Invasive species
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Invasive species
Urban development
Housing and urban development
Non-timber crops (ag)
Ranching
Logging
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Climate Change
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Hunting
Non-timber crops (ag)
Ranching
Dam and water management
Fragmentation; degradation
Roads and service corridors
Watershed alteration
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Fragmentation; degradation
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Ranching
Housing and urban development
Non-timber crops (ag)
Non-point pollution
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Rebecca Goldman
Invasive species
Habitat conversion
Invasive species
Non-timber crops (ag)
Dam and water management
Rebecca Goldman
Invasive species
Climate Change
Habitat conversion
Invasive species
Housing and urban development
Climate change and severe weather
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Pollution
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Logging
Fire
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Fire
Non-timber crops (ag)
Logging
Fishing
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Logging
Housing and urban development
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Logging
Recreational activities
Non-timber crops (ag)
Dam and water management
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Recreational activities
Fragmentation; degradation
Rebecca Goldman
Overharvest
Logging
Hunting
Fishing
Rebecca Goldman
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Fishing
Watershed alteration
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Pollution
Rebecca Goldman
Overharvest
Habitat conversion
Fishing
Recreational activities
Rebecca Goldman
Habitat conversion
Overharvest
Rationale
Rationale
Rationale
Rationale
Project goals
Ecosystem service targets ES target comments
Habitat targets
Micro-financing to small Timber
less timber harvest will lead to a more stable and productive forest
mountainous rural
Natural medicines
villages. Protect forests Food (subsistence)
from overharvest and
improve living conditions
by promoting sustainable
take and conversion to
alternative energy
sources.
Helps improve the
livelihoods of local
residents and promote
community economic
development ; ?
Contributes to the
Federally owned and
regulated national parks
were not well-managed
and rules were poorly
enforced.
Recreation
Timber
Food (subsistence)
Other cultural services
Natural medicines
Mining
Promotion of sustainable
logging which will provide
the potential for
economic development.
Negotiation of
mechanisms that will
ensure sustainable
logging.
FSC certified forest
management.
Threats: agriculture,
Food (subsistence)
timber harvest for
Forage
firewood, cattle grazing, Other cultural services
cotton farming,
poaching, unsustainable
fishing and hunting,
pollution.
Implement better
management practices
of National Forests and
regulate their usage.
Abate negative human
impacts on the wildlife
Water quality
Water quantity
Timber
Fisheries
Recreation
Natural medicines
Food (subsistence)
Water quality
Water quantity
Timber
Food (subsistence)
Other cultural services
Natural medicines
Recreation
Fisheries
Other
Other cultural services
Genetic resources
Forage
By collaborating with
ranch owners to mitigate
the threat of
fragmentation this
project works to protect
large grassland
landscapes and its suite
of biodiversity.
Water quality
Fisheries
Timber
Soil Stabilization
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Forage
Genetic resources
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Recreation
Shoreline hazards
Fisheries
Soil Stabilization
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Other
Other cultural services
Carbon sequestration
Natural medicines
Food (subsistence)
Recreation
Timber
Flood mitigation
Water quality
Water quantity
Shoreline hazards
Food (subsistence)
Timber
Natural medicines
Recreation
Carbon sequestration
Water quality
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Carbon sequestration
Timber
Water quality
mobilze community to
replant
surrounding
Main threats:
Wildlife
Recreation
were seen as pests, no Food (subsistence)
benefit came from them, Other
they were widely hunted
down and populations
reached very low levels.
Poaching, habitat
fragmentation,adhoc
settlement, military
presence, and drought
all contributed to the
decline in wildlife
populations.
Community level
Gladden Spit is the spawniFisheries
Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Other cultural services
Genetic resources
Threats: In response to
the decline in Olympia
oysters, fishermen
switched to farming
imported Pacific oysters.
Habitat conversion from
not only development but
also docks and piers and
Threats: In response to
the decline in Olympia
oysters, fishermen
switched to farming
imported Pacific oysters.
Habitat conversion from
not only development but
also docks and piers and
Major threats aside from
current rural
development are the
prospective development
of what is now farmlands
that boarder the
watershed. Storm water
runoff from
anthropogenic
development flow into
the river and pollute the
waters. Also, with the
new high oil prices it has
become economically
feasible to reopen and
also build new wells in
manage the landscape
for a balance of natural
conservation and human
use
Promote conservation of
natural resources,
recreation, flood control,
economic development
and hydropower
production
Water quality
Recreation
Other
Water quality
Oysters clean the water and are part of the ecosystem composition by pro
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Recreation
Other
Recreation
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Water quantity
There is also an
noticeable increase in
the visitation to the
Green with the creation
Improving river benefits m rich slope Mesic forests
non-riverine wetland
forests
largest and least
disturbed bottomland
hardwood forest
ecosystem on the
Atlantic Slope
Recreation
Water quality
Fisheries
Other cultural services
Genetic resources
Timber
Water quantity
Pollination
Water quality
Other
Fisheries
Water quality
Nutrient cycling
Other
The approach to
longleaf pine habitat and
conservation has moved
to a landscape scale so
acquiring these lands
was based on their
proximity and
connectability to other
protected and important
areas. The piecing
together of these
landscape scale
ecosystems will provide
better insurance for all
the important functions
as well as species that
are present.
Oysters are natural water In some cases, TNC gathers
Recreation
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Water quality
Soil Stabilization
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Misool program is to
Recreation
support the CTC Raja
Food (subsistence)
Ampat long term goals in Fisheries
this area (1) to maintain
the biodiversity of the
Raja Ampat islands at
least at 2003 levels, and
(2) to create together
with other partners a
resilient network of MPAs
in the Birds Head
functional seascape that
sustains resource for the
benefit of the people of
Set up a sustainable
financing mechanism for
the monitoring and
maintenance of the coral
reefs and waters around
the (Anilao) Mabini and
Tingloy municipalities.
Recreation
Fisheries
Water quality
Food (subsistence)
Water quality
Water quantity
Recreation
Carbon sequestration
Food (subsistence)
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Nutrient cycling
Flood mitigation
Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Soil Stabilization
Water quantity
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Soil Stabilization
Fisheries
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Carbon sequestration
Fisheries
Other cultural services
Natural medicines
Food (subsistence)
Recreation
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Water quality
Water quantity
Atlantic Rainforest
Assist in capacity
building, management,
funding, research of the
Apo Reef Natural Park.
Fisheries
Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Food (subsistence)
Soil Stabilization
Timber
Nutrient cycling
Other cultural services
Natural medicines
Genetic resources
Western Australia's
Wheatbelt is the nations
only Biodiversity Hotspot,
of which 90% of the
original bushland has
been cleared for
agricultural purposes.
This transformation has
caused the water table to
rise as well as the
salinity of the soils (a
huge problem for the
agriculturists now who
depend on farming and
livestock for their
livelihoods). The few
The Great Ruaha River
has expereinced
decreased flow and
complete drying in some
areas. A lot of people
are living and/or moving
to the upper catchment
area and impeding the
flow of water
To ensure a sustainable
flow of watershed
services to dependent
communities through the
establishment of
equitable payments
mechanisms to peoples
living in the upper
watershed; address
poverty alleviation. The
potential 'sellers' of the
ES are primarily the
(poor)indigenous
peoples who live on their
newly acquired land in
the upper watershed.
They already participate
in a 'payment' scheme
by policing poaching and
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Other
Water quality
Water quantity
Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Soil Stabilization
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Food (subsistence)
Soil Stabilization
Other cultural services
Regenerated/protected
woodlands could also
provide shelter for sheep
stocks, which are the
major livestock farmed in
the area (wool and
meat). Decreased
salinity would benefit
farmers.
In the first round, water
services were targeted
but this was abandoned
due to the difficulties of
actually measuring
improvements.
Water supply for people
and businesses.
River flow for
downstream electricity
dam that supplies
country's power.
woodland
shrub land
granite outcrops
naturally saline wetlands
Establish a baseline
evaluation of wetland
grass usage for cultural,
subsistence, and
economic reasons (by
local indigenous
communities). To inform;
and to determine if
wetlands and particular
wetland plant species
are being overused. To
insure that there's a
sustainable supply of
plant fibers so that this
tradition can continue.
Focus on basket
The western and central
parts of the Australian
Wheatbelt have been
subject to a long history
(of governmentally
endorsed) massive land
clearing for agriculture.
So, this naturally saline
landscape is
experiencing heightened
dry land salinization, due
to the intensity of
agriculture, at rates that
threaten survival of the
farming way of life. In
Massive land clearing of
the Australian Wheatbelt
has increased the
threats of hyper saline
soils (threatens
agricultural way of life),
erosion, and the loss of
valuable woodland and
other native vegetation
habitats.
Like the Woodland
Watch, this project
targets private
landowners and
Water quality
Fisheries
Recreation
Other cultural services
Natural medicines
Food (subsistence)
Forage
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Pollination
Other
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Pollination
Other
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Soil Stabilization
Recreation
Natural medicines
Food (subsistence)
Nutrient cycling
Fisheries
Other
empowerment of local
communities, support the
management of the
national park and the
sustainable use and
conservation of the suite
of natural resources
within and around the
area.
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Fisheries
Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Shoreline hazards
Other
Stakeholder engagement
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Food (subsistence)
Soil Fertility
Fisheries
Nutrient cycling
Other cultural services
Recreation
Through capacity
building of local
governments, NGOs,
and community networks
to institutionalize
changes necessary for
sustainable wetland
The aim of this project is Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Fisheries
Timber
Other
Many rural poor rely of wetinland freshwater wetlands all the way to coasta
Park is threatened by
increasing
encroachment:
conversion to agricultural
land, over extraction of
forest resources, and
illegal logging
(deforestation & erosion
threaten water
resources).
Engage stakeholders to
actively manage Lore
Lindu National Park.
Clearly designating
boundaries (with the help
The two main threats for
marine ecosystem are:
Destructive fishing
practices (blast fishing,
cyanide with hookah
compressor, fish-traps,
reef gleaning, and muro
ami) - destructive fishing
which also lead to overexploitation, mainly
disturbs coral reef, a
critical habitat for fish
resources;
& Over-exploitation
(over-harvesting the fish
The Asia Development
Bank (ADB) has initiated
an economic
development program in
5 nations (Vietnam, Lao
PDR, Cambodia, China,
& Myanmar) creating
corridors for
transportation &
communication of goods
and services. To
mitigate the impacts of
these activities they have
also initiated a
Biodiversity Corridors
project that works on
Fisheries
Recreation
Fisheries: especially
commercially important
species of reef fisheries;
& Eco-tourism: especially
for diving & snorkeling
through live aboard
vessels, local dive
operators and yachts
Water quality
Soil Stabilization
Flood mitigation
Genetic resources
Natural medicines
Fisheries
Food (subsistence)
Other cultural services
Timber
Fisheries
Food (subsistence)
Recreation
Other cultural services
Genetic resources
Natural medicines
Nutrient cycling
Soil Stabilization
Water quantity
Water quality
Shoreline hazards
Water quality
Water quantity
Fisheries
Recreation
Nutrient cycling
Carbon sequestration
Recreation
rainforest, savanna
Fisheries
Recreation
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Recreation
Other cultural services
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Timber
Recreation
Pollination
Food (subsistence)
Nutrient cycling
Natural medicines
Other cultural services
Fisheries
Genetic resources
Soil Fertility
Soil Stabilization
Water quality
Other cultural services
Nutrient cycling
Flood mitigation
Water quantity
Forage
Food (subsistence)
Water quality
Timber
Recreation
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Water quantity
remnant native
vegetation and proximity
to riparian zones or
connectability to other
target habitats.
Taking up where
previous WWF & IUCN
projects have left off, this
project seeks to
complete the process of
natural reserve
designation in key areas
as well as identify
smaller tracts for usable
village forests. Natural
resource management
and human development
go hand in hand, so
while communities work
towards forest
conservation they also
develop alternative
sources of livelihood to
decrease their reliance
The Indus ecoregion is
important both locally
and globally. This
project is the first phase
(6 yrs) of a 50 year
international vision to
conserve the natural
resources and improve
the human livelihoods
that depend on the Indus
area. The idea is that
through conservation of
the rich biodiversity of
the Indus Ecoregion,
local livelihood
improvement &
sustainable development
can be realized. This
project focuses on the
Gather working
information about the
rattan trade, production
chain dynamics, and the
ecological & socioeconomic status of two
key supplier countries:
Lao PDR and Cambodia,
and their major exporter:
Vietnam. The demand
for rattan far exceeds the
current methods of
supply while the
disconnect between
buyers and sellers
creates unsustainable
harvesting of the
resource. Still, rattan
Water quantity
Soil Fertility
Timber
Recreation
Other cultural services
Food (subsistence)
Other
Pollination
Nutrient cycling
Natural medicines
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Flood mitigation
Carbon sequestration
Timber
Fisheries
Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Other cultural services
Shoreline hazards
Nutrient cycling
Other
Natural medicines
Other cultural services
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Carbon sequestration
Timber
Other
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Recreation
Other
agriculture, fisheries,
tourism, industry, energy,
navigation, effluent
management, and urban
development
Fisheries
Recreation
Other cultural services
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Fisheries
Genetic resources
Food (subsistence)
Other
Other cultural services
Water quality
Water quantity
Timber
Natural medicines
Other cultural services
Forage
Soil Stabilization
Recreation
Genetic resources
Food (subsistence)
Water quantity
Timber
Recreation
Other cultural services
Food (subsistence)
Other
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Fisheries
Recreation
Nutrient cycling
Other cultural services
Genetic resources
Globally significant
biodiversity and forest
related products like
timber, building poles,
firewood, medicinal
plants, sacred forest.
Water quantity
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Recreation
Other cultural services
Shoreline hazards
Fisheries
Soil Stabilization
Basic ecological
Dry forests, and water bod
functions of dry forests.
Support of community
fisheries in the Srepok
river (the backbone of
the landscape)
Support of development
of an eco-tourism lodge
(implemented under a
different WWF project)
as an option for
sustainable financing for
the PA.
Note: Carbon
sequestration is not yet
being used, but is
Water quantity
Water quality
Recreation
Timber
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Natural medicines
Other cultural services
Water quality
Water quantity
Timber
Fisheries
Recreation
Food (subsistence)
Genetic resources
Natural medicines
Other cultural services
Water quality
Water quantity
Fisheries
Recreation
Fisheries
Timber
Soil Fertility
Soil Stabilization
Water quantity
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Recreation
Other cultural services
Genetic resources
Natural medicines
to be determined
Flood mitigation
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Fisheries
Recreation
Shoreline hazards
Implement the
framework developed for
the sale and purchase of
ecosystem services.
WWF will help to
facilitate agreements
between buyers and
sellers like water
providers and upland
Long history of WWF
involvement, since
creation of PA back in
1990s, helped with
legislation and
movement toward
spreading conservation
using the ecoregion
concept (including
fisheries and coatal
livelihoods). The priority
for this project is
biodiversity, followed by
natural habitats,
reducing level of threat,
and a productive
resource bases fro
coastal people. This
To promote better
investment and more
support (public & private)
for conserving forest
lands by increasing the
financial benefits that
come from these forests.
Some forest-lands in the
area are nationally
protected but those that
are not are at the risk of
losing valuable habitat.
Moreover, lack of
connectivity greatly
reduces the beneficial
impact that protecting
fragments of forest
Water quality
Water quantity
Carbon sequestration
Soil Stabilization
Fisheries
clean water
upland forested areas
(eventually fisheries and
carbon sequestration)
Food (subsistence)
Recreation
Fisheries
Water quality
Carbon sequestration
Timber
Natural medicines
Food (subsistence)
Carbon sequestration,
Humid and sub humid tropi
biodiversity, timber,
NTFPs, water
catchments, subsistence
of communities
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Flood mitigation
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
high grasslands
montane forests
Water quality
Water quantity
Soil Stabilization
Grover pine
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Carbon sequestration
through conservation
and restoration of trees.
Restore forest,
contribute to climate
mitigation, carbon
benefits, create jobs, and
be a model for other
Carbon projects.
Expand water fowl
habitat, restore the
natural floodplain, and
conserve threatened
habitats.
TNC initially bought into
the area because of
threatened habitat.
Valley Oak riparian
habitat was threatened
and TNC realized the
high value. After that
TNC realized that the
entire river corridor was
important as the
Cosumnes is the last
undamed river in the
The condor bioreserve
was created almost a
decade ago and has
been receiving money
from USAID PIP program
for half a decade. TNC
and USAID recognized
the need for a secure
financial fund because
the watershed in this
Carbon sequestration
The fisheries of
particular concern in this
case are freshwater
mussels and their larval
hosts (fish), diadromous
fish such as American
shad, alewife, and
American eel which have
been strongly affected by
changes in hydrologic
flow in the Neversink
region.
Other key ecological
attributes have also been
influenced
(1) Moderate/low
gradient groundwater
influenced riverine and
floodplain ecological
systems; (2) Low
gradient groundwater
influenced riverine and
bottomland swamp
ecological system
(Bashakill); (3)
High/moderate gradient
low alkaline headwater
riverine and riparian
ecological system (upper
Delaware branches and
Atlantic Forest
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Water quantity
Recreation
Water quality
Soil Stabilization
Water quantity
Recreation
Conserve protected
Water quality
areas and watersheds.
Recreation
Encouraging policy to
provide more money for
municipalities that
maintain protected areas
rather than develop. The
goal is to have municipal
government spend the
TNC's goal is to
Water quality
convince the watershed
committee to invest the
money from the water
user fees in watershed
restoration rather than in
water cleansing
technology.
Opportunity to invest a
tax in conservation of
watersheds.
Stabilize
soilsrestore
and
By example,
floodplain/tidal marsh
habitat to demonstrate
the benefits of water
absorption and to show
the economic value of
the project.
Gain credibility with the
landowners in the area
to be able to adeptly
demonstrate the benefits
of conservation and
restoration of natural
flows to the agriculture in
the area and
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Soil Fertility
Fisheries
Nutrient cycling
Want to encourage
Atlantic Forest
reforestation through
payments for improving
water quality for all users
in local municipalities.
TNC is trying to
Restoration of Estuarine h
demonstrate the
economic benefits of
removing constraints to
the system, which will
result in a more natural
flow regime and
therefore increased
water quality, quantity,
habitat, etc. Different
stakeholders will have
interest in different
services. They are
currently conducting a
stakeholder analysis that
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Genetic resources
Recreation
Soil Stabilization
Water quality
land out of production
Carbon sequestration
will mean larger area for Other cultural services
species. Plants and
animals will have
improved areas for living.
There is a strong link between community land use and cultural dynamics
Carbon sequestration
Timber
Recreation
Other
Main objective is to
Water quality
increase management
Water quantity
capacity of La Amistad
by establishing
appropriate relationships
between communities
and government.
Proposal for External
Affaris to quantify the
Water quality
Flood mitigation
Other cultural services
Recreation
Fisheries
Water quantity
Forage
Water quality
Water quantity
Flood mitigation
Soil Stabilization
Soil Fertility
Carbon sequestration
Timber
Recreation
Fisheries
Nutrient cycling
Water quality
Water quantity
Recreation
Flood mitigation
Reforestation for
Carbon sequestration
biodiversity preservation
and enhancement and
carbon sequestration
and mitigation. TNC
and partner
organizations originally
bought properties as
core biodiversity
reserves or as buffers to
core reserves.
Reforested lands were
privately owned
previously, and used
Biodiversity important
Carbon sequestration
area- highly threatened.
Want to add it to the
nearby Wildlife preserve.
Fisheries
Other cultural services
Water quality
Recreation
Create ecotourism or
Recreation
other economic park and
reserves around the
volcanoes and connect
the volcanoes with a
wildlife friendly corridor
Area of high biodiversity
under threat of
agricultural conversion
This was the example that was the genesis for the us
Recreation
Water quality
Fisheries
Shoreline hazards
Nutrient cycling
Site-based sustainable
Water quality
agriculture project and to Soil Stabilization
use the results of this
project to leverage policy
to encourage sustainable
behavior.
Trying to demonstrate
how farmers can
minimize damage to the
environment and yet
improve economic
returns via sustainable
BMPs on agricultural
land
Sustainable fisheries man Fisheries
To protect the
Water quality
watersheds within four
Flood mitigation
national parks in the
Water quantity
chiapas coastal
watershed area: El
Triunfo, El Encrucijada,
El Ocote, and El
Sepultura. These parks
are threatened by
deforestation for
agriculture and ranching
which threatens the
watersheds.
TNC is working with
Hermatypic corals
Rationale
Species targets
table and productive forest
Great apes
Elephant
Bongo antelope
African Gray Parrots
Rationale
Landscape details
Landscape details
Socioeconomic targets Implementation scale
Impact scale
Rural poor of Yunnan areaRegional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
blue oak
rare races of salmon
vernal pool plants and
animals
neo tropical migrant
song birds
anadromous fish
Tehama deer herd
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
seabirds, halibut,
salmon, herring, king
crab &
The Steller sea lion is
listed as endangered in
the western portion of its
range, and has declined
by over 80 percent in the
past 25 years;
The northern fur seal is
listed as depleted under
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Olympia oyster
Local
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
, mesoamerican reef
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Iraya Mangyan
Local
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Greater Kudu
Regional
Regional
Regional
Global
Global
rural poor
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Komodo Dragon
There are approximately 4,Regional
economically important
fish species (groupers,
napoleon wrasses and
reef-associated fish
species);
near-extinct species
(turtles, cetaceans and
dugong);
flagship species
attractive for marine ecotourism (manta).
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Local
Global
Regional
Global
Global
Local
oodland cover
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Global
shorebirds
Regional
fishermen, school
children
(general population of
Kashima)
Local
African Elephant
Dugong
Marine turtles
community
empowerment for
environmental
management
Regional
Regional
park communities
Regional
Regional
Global
Governments and
governmental
organizations
Local community (poor
who utilize natural
resources to survive)
Regional
Global
Edwards pheasant
various usable rattan
species
Governments and
governmental
organizations
Pa Ko and Van Kieu
ethnic communities
Regional
Regional
Regional
Local
Regional
Regional
No specific species
targets, however, WWF
has another program
here that focus on
species conservation
(primates, elephants,
tigers, buffalo, turtles,
etc.)
Regional
Local
Regional
Carnivores (Carnivora)
Business and industry
African elephants
General public
(Loxodonta africana sp.) Governments and
governmental
organizations
Regional
whale shark
pelagic fish
Regional
Regional
Orangutans
Proboscis & Leaf
monkeys
Sun bears
Gibbons
Banteng (wild cattle)
Hawksbill & Hornbill
turtles
Bornean peacock
pheasants
Storm's storks
Regional
Regional
Regional
an and delta
Punan Dayak
Local
Local
Regional
Regional
mahogany
Spanish cedar
ejidos
Regional
Local
Regional
Regional
Regional
mangroves
Regional
Regional
city of Camora
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Global
Swanson's hawk
Sandhill crane
Spectacled bear
Mountain Tapir
Mountain frogs
River otter
Involvement of
Regional
community and
maintenance of
conservation ethic
through time.
No net loss of farmlands
Local
Regional
Regional
Income to landowners
Regional
Regional
Local
Regional
Local
Global
Local
Regional
Local
Regional
Regional
Regional
Global
Global
Regional
Local
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Regional
Global
Global
Water fowls
Global
Local
Local
Regional
Global
Regional
Blue-horned Currasow
Providing training and capRegional
Fern capital of the world
Regional
Tanagers
Quetzal and horned
guan
neotropical migratory
birds
Highland margay
Local
Global
Local
Local
Regional
Regional
Green turtle
Abalone
Pen shell
Black murex snail
Regional
Jaguar
Tapir
Puma
Spider monkey
Anteater
River crocodile
Regional
Landscape details
Original landowner
Federal
Landscape details
Landscape details
Landscape details
Post project landowner Landowner transitions
Landowner transition comments
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Individual private
Private to PNP
Individual private
Corporate
State
Federal
Local
Private nonprofit
Native American
Private nonprofit
Individual private
State
Corporate
Federal
Local
Native American
Private to PNP
Corp to PNP
Campo-Ma'an National
Park (264,064 ha) was
created in 2000 by the
Government of
Cameroon. The entire
area is made up of the
park, 5 logging
concessions, an agroindustrial zone (rubber
In 1990, TNC purchased
the 322,000-acre Gray
Ranch property from
previous family owner,
Mexican national Pablo
Brenner; 18 million
purchase: TNC owned
for 4 yrs. In 1994,
property sold to Animus
Foundation. TNC
retained a conservation
easement. Sold it for,
13.2 million to Animus,
4.8 million easement
value.
Malpai Borderlands
Most of the lands are prot
Corporate
Individual private
State
Private nonprofit
Corp to PNP
Private to PNP
PNP to State
Federal
Individual private
State
Local
Federal
Individual private
State
Local
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
State
Indigenous
Individual private
State
Indigenous
Individual private
None
no acquisitions or easemen
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
State
State
None
State
Individual private
State
Individual private
None
Individual private
State
Private nonprofit
Individual private
Private to PNP
PNP to State
Individual private
Corporate
Corporate
Private nonprofit
Individual private
Corp to PNP
Corporate
Private nonprofit
State
Corporate
PNP to State
PNP to Corp
Corp to PNP
Individual private
State
Private nonprofit
State
Private to PNP
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Local
Local
None
There is no landowner
transition. The status of
the area is local marine
tenure which belongs to
the local communities.
As agreed by the local
communities, the area
has been declared as
Marine Protected Area
(MPA) by the local
government through
decree of Bupati Raja
Ampat. The size of the
MPA is 335.000 ha.
Local
Local
Other
Other
None
Federal
Federal
None
Corporate
Individual private
Indigenous
State
Individual private
Indigenous
State
Corporate
State
Indigenous
Individual private
Federal
Federal
State
Individual private
Indigenous
None
Indigenous to State
Indigenous
Federal
Local
Indigenous
Federal
Local
None
Federal
State
Individual private
Federal
State
Individual private
None
Federal
Federal
None
Local
Local
None
Indigenous
Indigenous
None
Corporate
Individual private
Indigenous
Corporate
Indigenous
Individual private
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Federal
Local
Individual private
Federal
Local
Individual private
None
Indigenous
Indigenous
None
Indigenous
Individual private
Local
Local
Individual private
Indigenous
None
Individual private
Individual private
Private nonprofit
State
Private to State
Private to PNP
Individual private
Individual private
Private nonprofit
State
Private to State
Private to PNP
Local
Individual private
Local
Individual private
None
Other
Other
None
Other
Other
None
State
Individual private
State to private
State
Local
State
Local
None
Local
Federal
Indigenous
Federal
Local
Indigenous
None
Local
State
Corporate
State
Local
Corporate
Local to Cop
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Individual private
Indigenous
Local
Fed to private
Fed to indigenous
Fed to Local
Local
Local
None
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Federal
State
Private to PNP
Private to Fed
Private to State
A series of land
donations to TNC in
1990 initiated their
involvement in
conservation of the lake:
local landowner Robert
McCurdy donated 478
acres, followed by
another 589 acres by
Judge John Paul Harkey.
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Local
Local
None
Indigenous
Indigenous
None
State
State
None
Cagayancillo is the
municipality that
exercises political
jurisdiction over TRNP
and it was proclaimed as
a National Marine Park
in 1988. The MPA was
recently expanded to
include the Jessie
Beazley reefs, which
increased the park size
by 3 time to 96,828
hectares. This was
prompted by both
UNEDP and the
Cagayanon municipality
wishes to protect this
Federal
Federal
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
no transfer of ownership.
Local
Individual private
Corporate
Federal
Local
Indigenous
Individual private
Corporate
Federal
Fed to Local
Fed to indigenous
In Tanzania there is a
new landownership
policy where plots can be
claimed under
community ownership
and management if the
state is presented with a
usage plan.
Kenya - most of the land
is under private
ownership.
Mozambique landownership policy
less developed than TZ,
a lot of land belongs to
concessions.
State
Indigenous
State to Indigenous
Federal
Local
Individual private
Corporate
State
Federal
State
Local
Corporate
Individual private
None
Federal
Local
Individual private
Federal
Local
Individual private
None
Cambodia - group of
villages under the
commune system
Prek Thnot Commune,
Kampot Province around the Bokor
National Park
Lao- village entity is
recognized.
2 project sites in Lao
PDR (2 villages) & 1 in
Cambodia (4 villages)
Forest areas are
collectively owned and/or
designated for certain
village or household
Local
Indigenous
Local
Indigenous
None
Local
Federal
Local
Federal
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Corporate
Federal
Individual private
Federal
Corporate
Individual private
None
Individual private
Indigenous
Federal
Federal
Federal
Individual private
Indigenous
Federal
None
None
Federal
Individual private
Local
Federal
Local
Individual private
Fed to Local
Landscape is a mosaic
of 15 national forest
reserves and over 15
village forest reserves, 1
national Teak Plantation,
and some privately
owned tea estates with
processing plants on the
river, and finally a few
woodlands that do not
have any legal status
yet.
Federal
Local
Indigenous
Fed to indigenous
Fed to Local
Individual private
Individual private
None
Individual private
Corporate
State
Individual private
Corporate
Corp to State
Private to State
Individual private
Federal
Private to Fed
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Federal
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Individual private
Local
Corporate
Local
Private to Corp
Private to Local
Convinced Ukrainian
government to restore
and protect lands in the
Danube delta. The Local
government is buying the
land, if it does not own it
already, and converting it
to more flood tolerant
usage like tourism or wild
cattle farming. The
returns are
compensating the
change in the reduced
cost of flood-related
damages & income from
Indigenous
Indigenous
None
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Indigenous
Fed to indigenous
Indigenous
Indigenous
None
Individual private
Federal
Federal
Individual private
None
Federal
Federal
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Individual private
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Individual private
Federal
Private nonprofit
Private nonprofit
Fed to PNP
Private to PNP
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Federal
Individual private
Private to Fed
Private to PNP
Federal
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Indigenous
Federal
Private nonprofit
Individual private
Indigenous
None
Local
Individual private
Local
Individual private
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Individual private
Individual private
None
Individual private
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Local
Federal
Private to Fed
Private to Local
Private to PNP
Individual private
Federal
Individual private
Federal
None
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Federal
Indigenous
Individual private
Indigenous
Individual private
Federal
None
Individual private
Individual private
Federal
State
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Private to State
Private to Fed
State
Local
Individual private
Individual private
State
Local
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Private to State
Private to Local
Individual private
State
Local
Private nonprofit
Individual private
State
Local
Private nonprofit
None
Local
Individual private
Corporate
State
State
Local
Individual private
Corporate
Private to State
Private to Local
Private to PNP
Individual private
Local
Federal
Federal
Local
Individual private
None
Federal
Federal
None
Individual private
Indigenous
Individual private
Indigenous
None
State
Private nonprofit
State
Private nonprofit
None
Individual private
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Corporate
Private nonprofit
Corp to PNP
Individual private
Individual private
None
Indigenous
Individual private
Federal
Federal
Individual private
Indigenous
None
Local
Individual private
Local
Individual private
None
Individual private
Indigenous
Individual private
Indigenous
Private nonprofit
Private to PNP
Federal
Federal
None
Federal
Indigenous
Individual private
Federal
Indigenous
Individual private
None
State
Individual private
State
Private nonprofit
Individual private
State to PNP
Private to PNP
Individual private
Individual private
None
Federal
Individual private
Individual private
Federal
None
Federal
Individual private
Indigenous
Federal
Individual private
Indigenous
None
Landownership is difficult
here as we are talking
about open access
fisheries, but really what
they are trying to do in
most areas is actually
create permitting and no
take zones and give
people particular rights
to fishing so actually
establishing ownership.
In some cases the
federal government has
created legal reserves in
All reserves are federal
land and private and
ejido land 70% are
property of people living
in the land
TNC and partners are
trying to encourage
sustainable land
behavior in the Park area
- not trying to change
land ownership patterns.
Landscape details
Original land cover
Native forest
Landscape details
Landscape details
Landscape details
Pre project land cover Post project land cover
Landcover transition comments
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Massive deforestation for
Converted
Converted
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Other
Native forest
Native grassland
Other
Native forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Native grassland
Other
Wetland
Native forest
Native grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Intertidal
Other
Native forest
Intertidal
Non-native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Other
Non-native forest
Mixed forest
Intertidal
Converted
Other
Native grassland
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Protection of an
unfragmented landscape
in outstanding condition.
Prevention of the
conversion of grassland
to shrublands and also
the conversion to rural
subdivisions
Native grassland
Other
Native forest
Non-native grassland
Mixed grassland
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Native grassland
Mixed grassland
Other
Native forest
Non-native grassland
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Native grassland
Mixed grassland
Native forest
Converted
Other
Wetland
Non-native grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Native grassland
Wetland
Intertidal
Subtidal
Native grassland
Wetland
Intertidal
Subtidal
Native grassland
Wetland
Intertidal
Subtidal
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Wetland
Other
Native grassland
Non-native grassland
Intertidal
Other
Intertidal
Other
Intertidal
Other
Wetland
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Converted
Native grassland
Other
Native forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Other
Native grassland
Native forest
Other
Subtidal
Subtidal
Subtidal
Subtidal
Subtidal
Subtidal
Intertidal
Intertidal
Intertidal
Converted
Other
Native forest
Mixed forest
Other
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed grassland
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Native forest
Converted
Other
Wetland
Native forest
Wetland
Mixed forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Wetland
Converted
The Nature
Conservancys Green
River project area
includes 1,350 square
miles of the upper Green
Beginning in the Blue Ridg
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Intertidal
Intertidal
Intertidal
Native forest
Native forest
Native forest
Other
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Other
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Other
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Other
Various mountain
ecosystems: forests,
alpine mosaic, alpine
lakes, ravine
ecosystems, red
sandstone especially
fragile, cannot be
recovered once lost,
shruby area.
Subtidal
Intertidal
Other
Intertidal
Subtidal
Other
Intertidal
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Native forest
Native grassland
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Mixed grassland
Native forest
Mixed grassland
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Native grassland
Mixed forest
Converted
Native grassland
Mixed forest
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Subtidal
Intertidal
Intertidal
Subtidal
Intertidal
Subtidal
Subtidal
Intertidal
Other
Native forest
Subtidal
Other
Converted
Mixed forest
Intertidal
Mixed forest
Intertidal
Other
Subtidal
Converted
Native forest
Native forest
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Non-native forest
Wetland
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Wetland
Converted
Other
Wetland
Mixed scrub/shrub
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed scrub/shrub
Wetland
Woodlands, shrubs,
granite outcroppings,
and naturally saline
wetlands comprise the
landscape of which 90%
of the has been cleared
for agriculture.
Primary use are sheep
grazing for wool and
meat, and, wheat, oats,
and barley agriculture.
Native forest
Wetland
Native grassland
Converted
Native forest
Mixed grassland
Converted
Native forest
Mixed grassland
Native grassland
Wetland
Native forest
Mixed grassland
Wetland
Mixed forest
Converted
Converted
Wetland
Mixed forest
Mixed grassland
Tender proposals
included replanting
and/or protection of
Remnant of natural
forest and some grass
cover. The areas that
are still forested are in
the national parks, other
areas, people have
converted most of the
area (cut down most of
the trees.)
Mount Guiting-Guiting
First, in the Panangcalan
watershed, forest area
decreased 23% from 886
hectares in 1976
decreased to 680
hectares in 2006. The
decrease in forest area
can be attributed to
conversion of 163 has
into coconut lands, 57
hectares to grasslands
and 11 hectares to
swidden farming. The
forest cover of the
Cantingas watershed in
1976 was reduced 14%
from 4626 hectares of
forest to 3843 hectares
Wetland
Wetland
Converted
Wetland
Converted
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Original landcover is
eucalypt woodland and
some shrubs.
Converted
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Native forest
Wetland
Wetland
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Wetland
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Other
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
None
Subtidal
None
Subtidal
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Subtidal
None
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Subtidal
None
Subtidal
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Wetland
Other
Wetland
Other
Wetland
Other
Mixed forest
Wetland
Native grassland
Mixed forest
Wetland
Converted
Native grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed forest
Wetland
Converted
Native grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Intertidal
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Intertidal
Native grassland
Native forest
Intertidal
Subtidal
Converted
Other
Native forest
Mixed forest
Non-native forest
Non-native forest
Mixed forest
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Wetland
Other
Native grassland
Native forest
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Wetland
Other
Wetland
Mixed forest
Mixed grassland
Other
Native forest
Native grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Native forest
Native grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Native grassland
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Intertidal
Subtidal
Other
Intertidal
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Intertidal
Other
Intertidal
Wetland
Other
Intertidal
Wetland
Other
Intertidal
Wetland
Other
Intertidal
Wetland
Intertidal
Wetland
Intertidal
Wetland
Native forest
Other
Converted
Other
Mixed grassland
Mixed scrub/shrub
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Other
Converted
Mixed scrub/shrub
Mixed grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Other
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Mixed scrub/shrub
Other
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Mixed scrub/shrub
Converted
Other
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed forest
Non-native grassland
Mixed forest
Native scrub/shrub
Non-native grassland
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Intertidal
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Mixed scrub/shrub
Wetland
Intertidal
Converted
Intertidal
Converted
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Mixed scrub/shrub
Native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Intertidal
Native forest
Other
Wetland
Intertidal
Native forest
Other
Wetland
Converted
Intertidal
Wetland
Native forest
Other
Intertidal
Subtidal
Native forest
Converted
Intertidal
Subtidal
Converted
Native forest
Intertidal
Subtidal
Native forest
Converted
Wetland
Intertidal
Native grassland
Wetland
Intertidal
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Native forest
Wetland
Intertidal
Converted
Native grassland
Kashima residents go up
to the mountain areas
where logging
companies had
previously deforested
and replant the area with
native trees as part of a
program by the Forestry
Agency.
Many people do
agriculture on their lands
for sale and subsistence.
Native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Converted
Mixed forest
Subtidal
Intertidal
Wetland
Native grassland
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Subtidal
Intertidal
Wetland
Native grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Native forest
Converted
Subtidal
Converted
Intertidal
Native scrub/shrub
Wetland
Native forest
Native grassland
Subtidal
Wetland
Intertidal
Native forest
Other
Subtidal
Intertidal
Wetland
Native forest
Other
Converted
Subtidal
Other
Intertidal
Wetland
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Designation of unclaimed l
Native forest
Native scrub/shrub
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Other
Wetland
Other
Converted
Mixed forest
Wetland
Converted
Mixed forest
Other
Wetland
Native forest
Wetland
Native forest
Wetland
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Converted
Native forest
Wetland
Wetland
Mixed forest
Native forest
Wetland
Native forest
Converted
Wetland
Mixed forest
Wetland
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Native forest
Subtidal
Intertidal
Native forest
Subtidal
Intertidal
Native forest
Intertidal
Subtidal
Intertidal
Subtidal
Intertidal
Subtidal
Intertidal
Subtidal
Native forest
Wetland
Native grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Native grassland
Native forest
Native grassland
Converted
Native forest
Mixed forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Wetland
Converted
Wetland
Wetland
Converted
Native forest
Native forest
Native forest
Subtidal
Intertidal
Wetland
Subtidal
Intertidal
Wetland
Subtidal
Intertidal
Wetland
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Native forest
Wetland
Native scrub/shrub
Wetland
Mixed forest
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Native scrub/shrub
Wetland
Converted
Native forest
Native grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Converted
Wetland
Other
Native forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Wetland
Other
Converted
Mixed forest
Wetland
Other
Native forest
Mixed forest
Non-native grassland
Converted
Mixed forest
Non-native grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Wetland
Mixed grassland
Mixed forest
Converted
Wetland
Mixed grassland
Native grassland
Native forest
Wetland
Mixed forest
Mixed grassland
Converted
Wetland
Mixed forest
Converted
Wetland
Mixed grassland
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Native forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Native forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Native scrub/shrub
Other
Non-native grassland
Converted
Converted
Native scrub/shrub
Other
Wetland
Native grassland
Mixed grassland
Converted
Wetland
Non-native forest
Native grassland
Wetland
Non-native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Native forest
Mixed forest
Mixed forest
Native forest
Native grassland
Wetland
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Native forest
Native grassland
Wetland
Native grassland
Converted
Native grassland
Wetland
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Wetland
Mixed forest
Converted
Wetland
Mixed forest
Converted
Wetland
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Wetland
Native forest
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Non-native grassland
Mixed forest
Converted
Non-native grassland
Native forest
Native grassland
Native forest
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Non-native grassland
Converted
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Original cover:
bottomwood forest
Target bottomwood
forest replicate natural
species composition and
structure
Pre-project - agriculture
Other
Converted
Other
As this is a freshwater
project there is no land
cover change - it is
merely changing from a
dammed river from to an
un-dammed one.
"Converted" here means
converted from its usual
cycle.
Native forest
Wetland
Converted
Wetland
Mixed forest
Wetland
Converted
Native forest
Native grassland
Converted
Native forest
Native grassland
Converted
Native grassland
Native forest
Native forest
Mixed forest
Converted
Mixed forest
Converted
Native scrub/shrub
Native grassland
Converted
Native scrub/shrub
Mixed grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Converted
Mixed grassland
Native scrub/shrub
Native scrub/shrub
Native scrub/shrub
Native forest
Native forest
Converted
Native forest
Converted
Subtidal
Intertidal
Converted
Intertidal
Subtidal
Intertidal
Native grassland
Non-native grassland
Converted
Mixed grassland
Converted
Other
Subtidal
Subtidal
Other
Subtidal
Other
Native forest
Intertidal
Wetland
Native forest
Converted
Wetland
Intertidal
Native forest
Converted
Wetland
Intertidal
Landscape details
Landscape details
Landscape details
Pre project land use
Post project Land use
Land use transition comments
Primary forest clearing
Sustainable timber
biogas digesters, solar wat
Selective logging
harvest
Residential development Residential development
Unsustainable
agroforestry
Residential development
Primary forest clearing
Selective logging
Recreational open space
Nature reserve
Sustainable timber
There is a lot of hunting
harvest
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable timber
More community based reso
harvest
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Recreational open space
Residential development
Sustainable grazing
Specialty crops
Plantation forestry
Commodity Crops
Primary forest clearing
Subsistence farming
Sustainable timber
harvest
Plantation forestry
Subsistence farming
Commodity Crops
Nature reserve
Unsustainable grazing
Sustainable grazing
Maintaining the historic u
Residential development Residential development
Sustainable grazing
Commodity Crops
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Sustainable grazing
Other use
Residential development
Recreational open space
Unsustainable fishing
Commodity Crops
Commercial
development
Sustainable grazing
Nature reserve
TNC buys land along the Ar
Recreational open space
Sustainable fishing
Sustainable grazing
Other use
Other use
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable grazing
Unsustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Sustainable timber
People are allowed to use
harvest
Nature reserve
Recreational open space
Other use
Subsistence farming
Less timber harvest
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable grazing
Residential development
Recreational open space Recreational open space the land went from unmanag
Residential development Sustainable grazing
Other use
Sustainable agroforestry
Residential development
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space Nature reserve
Recreational open space Recreational open space Much of the same usage, bu
Aquaculture
Aquaculture
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Recreational open space
Commodity Crops
Sustainable fishing
Subsistence farming
Keeping the land in its cu
Commodity Crops
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Unsustainable grazing
Nature reserve
Commercial
Recreational open space
development
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Sustainable fishing
Subsistence farming
Plantation forestry
Nature reserve
Most of the land will be t
Recreational open space
Sustainable fishing
Sustainable timber
harvest
Unsustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Other use
Nature reserve
Selective logging
Nature reserve
Selective logging
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Users will have to pay a f
Recreational open space Recreational open space
Selective logging
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Recreational open space
Nature reserve
It is not certain yet what
Sustainable agriculture
Recreational open space
Sustainable timber
harvest
Subsistence farming
Sustainable grazing
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Residential development
200,000 ha of the
catchment area have
been cleared in the past
4.5% for cropping or
improved cattle pastures.
This percentage is
significant because it is
largely on the better
soils, flood plains.
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Selective logging
Residential development
Unsustainable
agroforestry
Selective logging
National park and protecte
Sustainable agroforestry
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Residential development
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Reforestation of public p
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Residential development Residential development
Unsustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Since July 2007, a "noRecreational open space Recreational open space take zone policy" for the
Nature reserve
whole Apo Reef Natural
Park area is being
implemented to
regenerate the fish
stocks. A buffer zone 2
km away from the reef
area marks where fishing
becomes legal again.
Unsustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Commercial
development
Residential development
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Residential development
Recreational open space
Commercial
development
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Some illegal logging goes
Recreational open space Recreational open space
Selective logging
Sustainable timber
harvest
Commodity Crops
Plantation forestry
Subsistence farming
Residential development
Unsustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Commodity Crops
Sustainable grazing
Wetlands were
converted for other use
up to 40 years ago. For
example, they were
drained and used for
agriculture and then sold
to plantation forestry
(among other things)
industries. This project
targets old and existing
wetlands for
rehabilitation and
preservation through
sustainable use or BMP.
Wetlands can still be
Commodity Crops
Unsustainable grazing
Commodity Crops
Sustainable grazing
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Specialty crops
Residential development
Sustainable grazing
Specialty crops
Program covers 83000 km2
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Residential development
Sustainable grazing
Selective logging
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Abandoned
Residential development
Subsistence farming
With the Indigenous People
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable agriculture
Residential development
Other use
Selective logging
Unsustainable
agroforestry
Subsistence farming
Unsustainable grazing
Other use
manage wetland use
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable agriculture
Unsustainable grazing
Commodity Crops
Commodity Crops
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable grazing
Unsustainable grazing
Commodity Crops
Commodity Crops
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable timber
harvest
Subsistence farming
Aquaculture
Nature reserve
Recreational open space
Sustainable grazing
Residential development
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Properly managed
farms, improved
livestock rearing
practices, pasture
establishment, storm
flow storage,
reforestation and buffers
along riparian zones.
Subsistence farming
Aquaculture
Unsustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Residential development
Industrial development
Unsustainable grazing
Other use
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Aquaculture
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Residential development
Industrial development
Sustainable grazing
Other use
Nature reserve
Residential development
Recreational open space
Primary forest clearing
Subsistence farming
Other crops
Sustainable timber
harvest
Abandoned
Nature reserve
better park management an
Sustainable timber
harvest
Subsistence farming
Other crops
Recreational open space
9 project sites in 4
different countries.
capacity building for
conservation of vital
wetlands and the
sustainable usage of
their resources.
Sustainable timber
harvest
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Selective logging
Primary forest clearing
Residential development
Industrial development
Commercial
development
Plantation forestry
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Sustainable agroforestry
Subsistence farming
Residential development
Influx of people
immigrating to area to
settle land poses
encroachment threat to
park. Plantations,
logging, & conversion
lead to erosion and
flooding.
This is an attempt to stop
deforestation.
Unsustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Recreational open space Recreational open space
Sustainable fishing
Other use
Other use
Abandoned
Nature reserve
Unsustainable fishing
Nature reserve
The park is managed by
Recreational open space the Tubbataha Protected
Sustainable fishing
Area Management Board
(TPAMB).
This is a "no take" area
where only recreation,
research, and
conservation activities
are allowed.
Unsustainable fishing
Other use
Other use
Other use
Other use
Egg poaching abated.
Unsustainable fishing
Residential development Coastal development
Residential development Recreational open space planned.
Recreational open space
Commodity Crops
Unsustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Specialty crops
Commodity Crops
Specialty crops
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable grazing
Nature reserve
Village forest reserves ar
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable agroforestry
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable fishing
Other use
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable timber
harvest
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Pai - Sanctioned
irrigation supply had to
be adopted because of
the construction of
protective embankments
along the Indus River in
the early twentieth
century; however, even
this has been stopped in
the last three years due
to the upstream
diversion of water by
local influential
landowners for
agricultural purposes.
Groundwater is used
instead, representing a
considerable additional
cost. Local inhabitants
Develop acitivity plan
Project site 2 in loas and
1 in Cambodia. 2 loas
village and 4 in cam.
mall things could be
done. Dont cut
everything, dont
damage the trees.
Rattan- keep in the
natural forest. Other
NTFP mush honey,
bamboo, cardamon,
mostly natural forest.
Not used for
agroforestry.
Unsustainable fishing
Recreational open space Madang Lagoon - 4
Recreational open space Nature reserve
Wildlife Management
Nature reserve
Areas covering 1085
hectares of coral reef,
mangrove, seagrass,
and open sea habitat.
Within network
boundaries are spawning
aggregation sites, major
nutrient upwelling and
nursery areas, and sites
of major cultural and
historical importance.
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space Nature reserve
Residential development Recreational open space
Primary forest clearing
Selective logging
Industrial development
Nature reserve
Commodity Crops
Subsistence farming
Unsustainable fishing
Primary forest clearing
Other use
Sustainable fishing
Sustainable agriculture
Subsistence farming
Other crops
Recreational open space
Other use
Mbuke - locally
Potential coastal
development in both
sites.
Re-drawing of district
lines in the Cendrawasih
site.
Potential logging and/or
mining in the Jamursba
site. Protection of the
nesting beaches by the
local community and the
state in the future.
Flyway Shorebird
Network Site
Sustainable nori and
agricultural farming
Commodity Crops
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Aquaculture
Industrial development
Commercial
development
Residential development
Recreational open space
Difference
in landuses
Subsistence farming
implementing
natural res
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Commercial
development
Residential development
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Aquaculture
By addressing water
issues this project tries
to indirectly effect forest
conservation and
restoration, which are
inextricably linked in the
freshwater ecosystem.
Bien Hoa city is big
source of pollution and
thus a focus as well.
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Agriculture- forest
conversion for agriculture
for individual
communities
Two types of crops: food
and cash. Most
destructive is cash crop
farming (spices etc.) For
sale locally (w/in
country).
Sustainable fishing
There may not be much chan
Recreational open space
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable timber
harvest
Commodity Crops
Specialty crops
Subsistence farming
Commodity Crops
Nature reserve
Specialty crops
Recreational open space
Nature reserve
Recreational open space
Residential development
Industrial development
Unsustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Residential development
Nature reserve
Abandoned
Nature reserve
Other use
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable timber
harvest
Now:
river canalization
the canal walls forbid
access to the river for
walkers and alter habitat
over-exploitation of the
flood plain.
agricultural activities,
industries, or residential
development
there are also several
hydro-electrical power
facilities on the river with
several retention pools
Future:
restoration and 3rd
The proposed
hydroelectric dams
would greatly alter the
quality, quantity, and
timing of flow. Site
specificity is important to
note for the complex
karsts topography and
the implications this has
on the installation of any
large dam or hydraulic
structure.
Protected Mayan ruins:
Classic Maya (AD 250 900)
8 sites (but among many
Better zoning within prote
Selective logging
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Commercial
development
Recreational open space
Sustainable fishing
Sustainable timber
Establish better connectiv
harvest
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Other use
Recreational open space
Sustainable fishing
Selective logging
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Unsustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Residential development
Sustainable timber
harvest
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Other use
Residential development
Unsustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Commercial
development
Nature reserve
Sustainable fishing
Recreational open space
Commercial
development
Nature reserve
Selective logging
Subsistence farming
Other use
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Previously government
intended this area to be
converted to an oil palm
plantation, but this was
halted in 2003 by the
Lesan Berau district
issuing a decree to
protect the forest. Work
is being done to enhance
the protection on the
Lesan forest.
Other areas like Wahea
are also targeted for the
same path toward
protection.
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agroforestry Currently subsistence
Sustainable agroforestry Subsistence farming
agriculture and forestry.
Sustainable grazing
Other use
Very rural area but
Recreational open space changing fast as farmers
Nature reserve
move away and sell their
Sustainable grazing
lands to developers.
This project will work to
convince local people to
maintain their same
practice, eg. continue
low intensity agriculture.
Problem is that the
markets are weak or
gone so looking for new
markets to make this
type of agriculture
profitable (PES, organic
niche markets, tourism
Other crops
Recreational open space Local farmers and communi
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Unsustainable grazing
Residential development
Recreational open space
Abandoned
Other crops
Sustainable grazing
Nature reserve
Sustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Residential development Subsistence farming
Selective logging
Residential development
Sustainable timber
harvest
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Unsustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable agriculture
Unsustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Other crops
Nature reserve
Selective logging
Sustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Sustainable timber
harvest
Nature reserve
Selective logging
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Sustainable timber
harvest
Subsistence farming
Commodity crops
Sustainable agriculture
Other crops
Residential development
Other use
Selective logging
Recreational open space
Nature reserve
Commodity Crops
Unsustainable grazing
Selective logging
Land use is in transition
Commodity Crops
Other crops
Nature reserve
Other use
Residential development
Recreational open space
Unsustainable grazing
Other crops
Nature reserve
Other use
Unsustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Land used to be all cattle
Recreational open space
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable agriculture
Specialty crops
Commodity crops
Unsustainable grazing
Other crops
Aquaculture
Nature reserve
Some timber harvest
Unsustainable grazing
Selective logging
Primary forest clearing
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable agriculture
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Commodity crops
Unsustainable grazing
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable timber
harvest
Nature reserve
Commodity crops
Other crops
Commodity crops
Other crops
Nature reserve
Unsustainable grazing
Sustainable grazing
Nature reserve
Commodity crops
Sustainable agriculture
Residential development
Main purpose is to
remove constraints on
the Skagit River system
and to allow for natural
flood regimes to function
in select areas,
benefiting wild flora and
fauna species and
people with particular
emphasis on restoration
of estuarine habitat.
Abandoned
Other crops
Other crops
Subsistence farming
Selective logging
Nature reserve
The recreation that's allo
Sustainable timber
harvest
Recreational open space
Unsustainable grazing
Subsistence farming
Selective logging
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Sustainable grazing
Commodity crops
Residential development
Nature reserve
Other use
Sustainable timber
harvest
Nature reserve
Harvest
Other use
Sustainable timber
harvest
Other use
Residential development
Other crops
Nature reserve
Selective logging
Other use
EcoAsset Markets is intere
Residential development
Other crops
Nature reserve
Sustainable timber
harvest
Abandoned
Selective logging
Specialty crops
Residential development
Specialty crops
Sustainable timber
harvest
Recreational open space
Nature reserve
Sustainable agriculture
Residential development
Specialty crops
Abandoned
Selective logging
Other use
Nature reserve
Sustainable timber
harvest
Sustainable agriculture
Other use
Preservation areas NJ
State has instituted laws
that require 3%
impervious land cover,
there can be no more
than 10% modification of
forest land or any area
that is crucial for
endangered species.
There must be a 300
foot buffer along all
streams and in order to
put
single
septic
Theacore
zone
wastank
largely
Subsistence farming
Sustainable grazing
Specialty crops
Other use
Sustainable agroforestry
Sustainable grazing
Other crops
Subsistence farming
Commodity Crops
Unsustainable grazing
Abandoned
Nature reserve
Commodity Crops
Nature reserve
Other use
Commodity Crops
Primary forest clearing
Sustainable agriculture
Subsistence farming
Other crops
Nature reserve
Other crops
Subsistence farming
Commodity Crops
Recreational open space The sustainable land use
Subsistence farming
Nature reserve
in the multiple use zones
Recreational open space Sustainable agriculture is encouraged to be
shade grown, organic
coffee.
They main land uses
encouraged:
improved coffee
(certified)
ecotourism
forest conservation
Commodity Crops
Nature reserve
The change in land use is
Recreational open space Recreational open space
Unsustainable grazing
Recreational open space Recreational open space Trying to help really cons
Nature reserve
Nature reserve
Subsistence farming
Sustainable agriculture fishing, small scale ag an
Other use
Other use
Recreational open space Recreational open space
Unsustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Commodity Crops
Unsustainable grazing
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable grazing
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Specialty crops
Unsustainable grazing
Unsustainable fishing
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable grazing
Sustainable fishing
Nature reserve
Enabling tools
Enabling tools
Enabling tools
Broad conservation finance toolsMain Conservation finance tools
Easement characteristics
Subsidy
Other
Fees
Markets
Subsidy
Donation
User fee/access fee
Niche market
Other
Markets
Other
Niche market
Markets
Rights Transfer
Other
Markets
Fees
Rights Transfer
Other
User fee/access fee
Niche market
Rights Transfer
Other
Markets
Easement
Fee acquisitions
Donation
TDR
Banking market
NGO managed
Conservation buyer
Donated
Other partner managed
Rights Transfer
Easement
NGO managed
Conservation buyer
Rights Transfer
Easement
Fee acquisitions
Markets
Niche market
Subsidy
New subsidy
None
None
Subsidy
New subsidy
Donation
Markets
Rights Transfer
Other
Fees
Rights Transfer
Easement
Leased Land
Rights Transfer
Subsidy
Other
Redistribution of subsidy
Leased Land
Rights Transfer
Subsidy
Easement
New subsidy
Fee acquisitions
NGO managed
Rights Transfer
Easement
Fee acquisitions
NGO managed
Rights Transfer
Taxes
Fee acquisitions
Easement
Redistribution of taxes
Banking market
Conservation buyer
NGO managed
Other partner managed
Rights Transfer
Fee acquisitions
Conservation buyer
Fees
Other
Markets
Niche market
Other
Markets
Fees
Subsidy
Donation
Niche market
User fee/access fee
Fees
Markets
Other
Other
Taxes
Fees
Subsidy
New taxes
User fee/access fee
Donation
Fees
Markets
Subsidy
Rights Transfer
Markets
Subsidy
Easement
Carbon market
New subsidy
Fees
Fees
Conservation buyer
Fees
Fees
Fees
Markets
Niche market
Markets
Rights Transfer
Other
Easement
Niche market
Fees
Markets
Fees
Subsidy
Conservation buyer
None
None
Rights Transfer
Subsidy
Easement
New subsidy
Rights Transfer
Subsidy
Easement
New subsidy
Markets
Other
Niche market
Other
Markets
Niche market
Other
Markets
Subsidy
Niche market
Redistribution of subsidy
New subsidy
Taxes
Redistribution of taxes
None
Markets
Fees
Fees
Other
Markets
Markets
Fees
Niche market
User fee/access fee
Taxes
Markets
Other
Other
New taxes
Redistribution of taxes
Niche market
Fees
Rights Transfer
Fees
Donation
Fee acquisitions
User fee/access fee
Markets
Rights Transfer
Carbon market
Fee acquisitions
Donated
NGO managed
Other partner managed
Conservation buyer
Fees
Subsidy
Other
Donation
Other
Other
Subsidy
Donation
Subsidy
Donation
Subsidy
New subsidy
Other
Other
Markets
Other
Banking market
Other
Markets
Other
Other
Niche market
Markets
Other
Other
Niche market
Fees
Other
Other
Markets
Other
Other
Niche market
Markets
Other
Fees
Other
Markets
Other
Other
Niche market
Other
Markets
Other
Niche market
Markets
Niche market
Rights Transfer
Subsidy
Easement
Fee acquisitions
New subsidy
Rights Transfer
Subsidy
Taxes
Fee acquisitions
Other
New subsidy
Redistribution of taxes
Rights Transfer
Easement
Fee acquisitions
Other
Other
NGO managed
Other
Markets
Other
Niche market
Other
Other
Taxes
Fees
New taxes
User fee/access fee
Other
Other
Rights Transfer
Easement
Other
Subsidy
New subsidy
Rights Transfer
Markets
Fees
Other
Fee acquisitions
Carbon market
Other
User fee/access fee
Fees
Fees
Other
Subsidy
New subsidy
Subsidy
New subsidy
Subsidy
Donation
Subsidy
Donation
Subsidy
New subsidy
Redistribution of subsidy
Rights Transfer
Fee acquisitions
Rights Transfer
Markets
Fee acquisitions
Carbon market
Rights Transfer
Markets
Fee acquisitions
Easement
Habitat banking market
Rights Transfer
Fees
Subsidy
Fee acquisitions
Donation
User fee/access fee
NGO managed
Leased Land
Other partner managed
Taxes
Redistribution of taxes
Fees
Markets
Subsidy
Fees
New subsidy
User fee/access fee
Rights Transfer
Fee acquisitions
Rights Transfer
Markets
Fee acquisitions
Easement
Donation
Wetland mitigation market
NGO managed
Other partner managed
Subsidy
Rights Transfer
New subsidy
Easement
NGO managed
Taxes
Markets
Redistribution of taxes
Carbon market
Fees
Rights Transfer
Easement
Fee acquisitions
NGO managed
Rights Transfer
Fee acquisitions
Easement
NGO managed
Other partner managed
Rights Transfer
Markets
Banking market
Easement
Fee acquisitions
Rights Transfer
Taxes
Markets
Subsidy
Easement
Fee acquisitions
Redistribution of taxes
TDR
Donation
Fees
Subsidy
New subsidy
User fee/access fee
Markets
Carbon market
Markets
Niche market
Markets
Carbon market
Markets
Rights Transfer
Carbon market
Fee acquisitions
Rights Transfer
Fee acquisitions
Markets
Subsidy
None
None
Subsidy
Fees
Markets
Subsidy
Rights Transfer
New subsidy
Easement
Fees
Fees
Rights Transfer
Fee acquisitions
Easement
NGO managed
Leased Land
Subsidy
New subsidy
Subsidy
Other
New subsidy
Other
Subsidy
New subsidy
Donation
Enabling tools
Role of finance tool
Carrot
Enabling tools
Enabling tools
Finance tools comment
Institutional tools
GreenVillage Credit is
New subsidy
available for families who
qualifiy for a loan of up to
$1,250. The loan is
dependent on a plan for
future income generation
and the sustainable
energy intended to
realize this plan
Both
Enabling tools
Role of Institutional tools
loan is generally 18
months with repayments
due every 6 months
annual interest rate is
approximately 5%
5% of the loan amount
will be deposited at a
designated bank account
in case of accidental
default on the loan by
any member of a
solidarity group
Carrot
Carrot
Both
Carrot
Easements- TNC,
Animas, Malpai accepts
donations
Development rights
Ownership rights
Other
Grassbanks serve as a
supplemental source of
grazing for ranchers who
agree to put easements
of development
restrictions on their land.
This method runs into
problems when natural
processes effect both
grassbanks and private
ranches (eg. droughts).
Carrot
Animas Foundation/Trust
Malpai Borderlands
Group
TNC
The Animas Foundation
is an organization
dedicated to protecting
the natural values of the
Gray Ranch while
maintaining the cultural
conservation easements
with local ranch owners
distinguishing water
rights and policy
genetic biodiversity
corridor project called
the Sacramento River
Project: (15 km) only
corridor from the Central
Valley into the Sierra
Mnts.
Dam removal project
Water Balancing project
Levee setback project
Carrot
Both
Carrot
Neither
Cap
Carrot
Carrot
Stick
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Ownership rights
Development rights
Carrot
Carrot
Ownership rights
Administration rights
Development rights
Redistribute tax
Ownership rights
Both
Carrot
Both
Both
Carrot
Both
Both
Carrot
Both
Both
New fee
Administration rights
Both
Both
Carrot
New fee
Carrot
Development rights
Regarding Conservation c
Nature Conservation
Covenants and Voluntary
Management
Agreements are
subsequent examples of
PES mechanisms that
provide funding for
private landholders to
manage their property.
Both
Both
None
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Revenue sharing
mechanism:
New tourism and
development initiatives
now route 10% of
revenue towards local
schools or other area of
need indicated by
communities.
Carrot
Carrot
Government recognition
of local resource
management
committees for the
creation and
implementation of plans.
Now all other local
authorities in Kenya are
required to follow same
sort of integrated
management
organization.
WWF worked with
Kenyan National
authorities to create a
A decision by the Inter-Am
Carrot
Redistribute tax
There is devolution of
20% of the collected
taxes from the tourism
activities for the local
communities by the
government of
Mozambique.
Governments reinforce
existing laws for
harvesting of resources
Neither
Both
Both
Both
Both
entrance fee
local led park tours
educational forest for
tourists
potential for carbon
market
Development rights
Administration rights
New fee
-increased income of
New fee
local district government Other
through tourism revenue
-increased catches of
local fishers outside notake zones (spill-over
and larval export effects)
-increased income of
local communities
through fisheries and
marine eco-tourism
Tourism user fees for
areas zoned for such
purposes - revenue used
A tax on natural resource
use already exists, but
work is being done to
modify and strengthen it.
Potential for the
development of a
community tax if an
entire community is
involved in a village
production scheme.
Communities are being
engaged in the creation
of nurseries to grow
NTFP and timber plants.
These stocks will be
New tax
Redistribute tax
Ownership rights
Other
Both
Administration rights
Other policy change
Both
Carrot
Ownership rights
Both
Carrot
Carrot
Promotion of sustainable
farming by the project
ensures employment for
youth and women
The Udzungwa park,
adjacent to the project
site, provides tourism
services
Carrot
Other
Ownership rights
Various alternative
livelihood opportunities Development rights
are promoted depending Administration rights
on the resources and
interests of the
respective communities.
These are meant to take
direct pressure off of
forests, because most
rely solely on forest
products for income.
Examples include:
beekeeping, ecotourism,
sustainable forestry,
mico-financing banks,
alternative agriculture
etc.
Village ownership of
Catchment Investment
Strategy (CIG) operating framework that
outlines goals and
strategies of the LPLMC
and the aims for tender
proposals. This serves
as recommended actions
to remediate the
catchment problems
and to encourage the
matching of land use
with best management
practice and land
capability.
Land Management Units
(LMUs) - classify land to
Identify key areas for
biodiversity and critical
habitat, focus on these to
work towards community
level management of the
areas. Enhance
community responsibility
and engagement. Areas
may sometimes be
granted as collectively
owned village forests if
the village presents a
management plan.
Besides land rights,
internationally
recognized tools such as
FSC certification,
Ramsar registration,
Carrot
Ownership rights
Development rights
Administration rights
Other policy change
Carrot
Carrot
There is no relationship
between local processing
companies and Ikea
We want to work with
Laotian and Cambodian
private sectors to
strengthen their position
in relation to their larger
Vietnamese trading
counterparts; potential to
create a supplier's
association.
Also, strengthen the
position of community
growers through
increased management
of rattan resources.
Both
Carrot
Carrot
Ownership rights
Development rights
Administration rights
Other
Other policy change
Recent political
decentralization- In 2002
special autonomy law
granted to Papua,
resource management
passed from national to
local responsibility. This
led to the re-designation
of districts, now must
integrate management of
park with special plan of
EACH district. In this
multi-district area the
national park has own
management body that
is autonomous yet
Since ancient times,
nearly 200-300 years
ago during the Edo
period, people have lived
in the wetlands.
Dwellers here know how
to live sustianably so the
idea is not to restrict the
area with an MPA (which
is too exclusive), but
instead share scientific
data with local people so
that they understand the
need to manage their
environment in a more
sustainable way.
Carrot
Other
New fee
Other policy change
Development rights
Other
Carrot
Alternative forms of
marine/aquatic resource
utilization that is less
destructive: sponge
harvest, different gears,
freshwater aquaculture
The provincial
government has a
framework for tackling
water
pollution
in this of
In
2002,
government
Mozambique declared
the Quirimbas
archipelago a national
park in response to a
request from local
communities and other
stakeholders who live
within and around the
archipelago.
Ministry of Tourism
issued a decree allowing
various activity fees,
concession fees, plane
fees, dive fees, but not
well understood. May
review next year.
Administration rights
Other policy change
Other
Cap
Ministry of Defense
signed
an order and
improved/integrated
fishing policy and
practice;
site/MPA creation and
management;
The Cuban government,
the Ministry of Fisheries,
is very aware of the
unsustainable fishing
problem and sought to
develop other
alternatives for
fishermen. Partnership
with WWF who was
working in the area and
had technical and
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Viable income
generating activities that
reduce pressure on
natural forest resources.
Facilitate income
generating activities
(IGAs) through training,
supply of initial materials,
and connections to
viable markets etc.
Eg. Butterfly farming womens groups & youth
who can export pupa to
Europe and Canada.
Bee keeping for honey
& wax consumed
locally. b/c packaging not
This project has a large
economic aspect. Land
use policy and decisions
are made on wellestablished old practices
like plantations. This,
however, displaces a lot
of village activities. In
addition, there are many
other NTFPs that could
be harvested and grown
in the forests while still
keeping them largely
intact. Not much has
been done in this respect
and so it is a potential
alternative to replacing
the forests with
a federally supported
Landowner Incentive
Program;
Ownership rights
Development rights
Administration rights
Other
Legal designation of
previously unclaimed
forests as village forest
reserves (VFR) creates
legal protection and calls
for a management plan.
Improved management
of VFR that already
exists through
Community based
resource management.
Ownership rights
Development rights
Administration rights
Other
Cap
New subsidy
Ownership rights
Development rights
Administration rights
accessing relevant state, Other policy change
federal, and private
funding sources
- acquire fee titles in
Yanahli Wildlife
Management and State
Natural Areas corridor
- acquire easements for
significant habitats in
Western Highland Rim
stream systems and
Eastern Highland Rim
wetlands.
Carrot
Carrot
New subsidy
Ownership rights
Development rights
Administration rights
Redistribute tax
Ownership rights
Development rights
Administration rights
Developing sustainable
financing mechanisms
for local communities to
benefit from the
biodiversity corridors.
Support of community
fisheries in the Srepok
river (the backbone of
the landscape)
Support of development
of an eco-tourism lodge
(implemented under a
different WWF project)
as an option for
sustainable financing for
Carrot
Both
Stick
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Wetland ecosystem:
huge flooding problems,
so work with government
on methods to mitigate
flooding.
Both
Both
Both
Carrot
Social responsibility
programs for companies.
This is the first regulation
on environmental
services: started at the
district level, now, its the
jurisdiction of the
Forestry Department that
Marine Parks ACT: all $
generated from fees
(etc.) has to be used
within the this particular
park.
Carrot
Institutional strengthenin
Carrot
Theseisare
voluntary
TNC
trying
to influence New subsidy
Redistribute subsidy
Carrot
Carrot
Must be able to
guarantee water in
quantity and quality
Neither
Carrot
Carrot
Both
Neither
Both
Carrot
Both
There needed to be a
policy to redistribute the
water fee to the
watershed committee
who then created a new
subsidy.
Neither
Carrot
Cap
Development rights
Carrot
Both
Corporate partners
contribute money to
mitigate carbon
emissions with the
potential sale of the
credits on the carbon
market.
Redistribute tax
Additionally, the
government is working to
redistribute the land tax
for conservation
purpsoses.
Both
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Both
Both
Development rights
New subsidy
New fee
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Carrot
Ownership rights
Administration rights
The indigenous
communities are given
logging concessions so
as to strengthen the
community. Additionally
FAN is working on land
titling for the
communities.
The administration rights
for the park have been
contracted out to FAN by
the National government.
Neither
Ownership rights
Carrot
New fee
Both
Carrot
Administration rights
Development rights
Both
Tourism fee.
Carrot
New fee
Administration rights
Carrot
Both
Trying to develop a
system of access rights
for fisheries.
Implemented fully
protected marine
reserves
Establish exclusive
fishing rights
Carrot
Enabling tools
Social tools
Communications
Workshops
Stakeholder engagement
Volunteers
Education and outreach
Stakeholder engagement
Training
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Preservation
Other
BMP forestry
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Mapping
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Infrastructure
Research
Biodiversity assessment
Outplantings
BMP forestry
Committee formation
Capacity building on the l
Stakeholder engagement
Training
Workshops
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Other
Park guards
Infrastructure
Tourism infrastructure
BMP forestry
Mapping
Infrastructure
Park guards
Tourism infrastructure
Biodiversity assessment
BMP forestry
Committee formation
Stakeholder engagement
Education and outreach
Community forums
Workshops
Meetings
Communications
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
Preservation
BMP ranching
Fire restoration
Ecosystem service
assessment
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Fire management
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
Fencing
Restoring riparian zone
BMP ranching
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Fire restoration
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Restoring riparian zone
Fire management
Mapping
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
Restoring channel flow
Malpai Borderlands
Group community/stakeholder
engagement, education.
BMP ranching
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Park guards
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
Restoring channel flow
Floodplain restoration
Research
Restoring riparian zone
Workshops
Other
Communications
BMP forestry
Tourism infrastructure
Pilot/demonstration
Research
Fire management
Infrastructure
Ecosystem service
assessment
Biodiversity assessment
Legal protection
Other
Outplantings
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
BMP ranching
Floodplain restoration
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
BMP forestry
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Park guards
Infrastructure
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Pilot/demonstration
BMP forestry
Outplantings
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Other
Education and outreach
Stakeholder engagement
Committee formation
Meetings
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Gathering knowledge
about the history and
workings of the reef were
initially from local
fishermen who knew the
area very well. They
were/are consulted in
terms of patterns for
species spawning that
are often
accurate/predictable
down to the day.
Education is a very
important component of
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Other
Research
Volunteers
Pilot/demonstration
Research
Other
Reseeding
Regeneration
Regeneration
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Training
Workshops
Other
Stakeholder engagement
Restoration
Research
Other
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Restoring riparian zone
Fencing
Restoring channel flow
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Stakeholder engagement
Volunteers
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Preservation
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
BMP forestry
Legal protection
Regeneration
Other
Reseeding
Regeneration
Pilot/demonstration
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Ecosystem service
assessment
Biodiversity assessment
Fire restoration
Fire management
BMP forestry
Park guards
Infrastructure
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Trail building
Pilot/demonstration
Other
Committee formation
Stakeholder engagement
Education and outreach
Meetings
Training
Workshops
Volunteers
Other
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Biodiversity assessment
Other
Forum Bersama, a
conservation-minded
forum of local
government agencies,
community groups, and
NGOs that was
conceived at a
stakeholders workshop
held in Misool in
December 2003. One of
TNCs objectives is to
continue to strengthen
this Forum, harnessing
its potential to become
directly involved in
Preservation
Best Management
Practices
Other
Research
Stakeholder engagement
Volunteers
Committee formation
Communications
Stakeholder engagement
Workshops
Meetings
Training
Stakeholder engagement
Meetings
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Other
Park guards
Other
Tourism infrastructure
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
BMP forestry
Research
Park guards
Legal protection
Fire management
Tourism infrastructure
Ecosystem service
assessment
BMP agriculture
Other
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Tourism infrastructure
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Ecosystem service
assessment
Pilot/demonstration
Research
Restoring channel flow
Floodplain restoration
Fire management
Outplantings
Restoring riparian zone
BMP ranching
Legal protection
Fire management
Other
Training
Workshops
Meetings
Committee formation
Education and outreach
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
Restoring riparian zone
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
Other
BMP forestry
Restoring riparian zone
Pilot/demonstration
Other
Not specifically
connected, there are
educational outreach
programs in local
schools teaching
environmental concepts
and awareness (HSBC).
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Park guards
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
Research
Biodiversity assessment
Committee formation
Formation of the Coastal Best Management
Stakeholder engagement
Practices
Other
Preservation
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Park guards
Other
Committee formation
Indigenous peoples empowe
Best Management
Stakeholder engagement
Practices
Restoration
Other
Preservation
BMP forestry
Park guards
Reseeding
Outplantings
Tourism infrastructure
Trail building
Communications
Volunteers
Stakeholder engagement
Training
Education and outreach
Meetings
Workshops
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Biodiversity assessment
Other
BMP ranching
Reseeding
Outplantings
Regeneration
Fire management
Removing invasive
species
Restoring channel flow
Floodplain restoration
Research
Public awareness is a
cornerstone of the
project; over 600 articles
published in local media;
over 3.5hrs national and
satellite television
advertisement; and over
13hrs on national radio.
December 2000:
community wetland
management
programme
Capacity building is one
of the biggest strengths
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Other
Communications
Pilot/demonstration
Fencing
Regeneration
Reseeding
Outplantings
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Biodiversity assessment
Committee formation
Education and outreach
Community forums
Stakeholder engagement
Meetings
Training
Communications
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Other
Outplantings
Other
Restoring riparian zone
Floodplain restoration
Restoring channel flow
BMP agriculture
Restoration
Research
Best Management
Practices
Training
Sustainability
Education and outreach assessment: trying to
Stakeholder engagement make wetland/plant
conservation
economically and
socially viable. Must
integrate local
knowledge and belief,
b/c this influence
peoples' actions. Actions
are dictated by traditional
beliefs. We look at
ecological perspective
and knit them together to
devise a system based
on sound science. But,
Other
By building relationships
Training
Stakeholder engagement
Education and outreach
Best Management
Practices
Other
Research
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Other
Pilot/demonstration
Research
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Research
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Infrastructure
Legal protection
Fencing
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Research
BMP agriculture
BMP forestry
BMP ranching
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Infrastructure
Legal protection
Fencing
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Other
Research
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Outplantings
Restoring channel flow
Floodplain restoration
Restoring riparian zone
Trail building
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Research
Best Management
Practices
Other
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Pilot/demonstration
Research
Other
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Legal protection
Stakeholder engagement
Other
Education and outreach
Meetings
Training
Workshops
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
Restoration
Other
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Research
Floodplain restoration
Pilot/demonstration
Best Management
Practices
Other
Preservation
Park guards
Infrastructure
Tourism infrastructure
Improve inter-regional
communication for
cooperation and
dialogue
Network creation:
Training
Communicate
Stakeholder engagement ecotourism opportunities
to potential tourist
Communications
markets (fliers, websites
posting in cities).
Show value of
conserving wildlife and
nature to local villagers
and tourists.
Meetings with local
villagers to talk about
potential ecotourism
sites and the concept of
ecotourism (to many this
Committee formation
Communications
Meetings
Stakeholder engagement
Community forums
Education and outreach
Training
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Preservation
BMP agriculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Park guards
Restoring channel flow
Research
Restoring riparian zone
Tourism infrastructure
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
Other
BMP forestry
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Infrastructure
Park guards
Legal protection
Other
Tourism infrastructure
Research
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Other
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Regeneration
Legal protection
Research
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Fencing
Improve agricultural
methods to abate
impact, encroachment,
and overuse of park land
and natural resources.
Facilitated creation of a
local liaison organization,
Forum Kemitraan Taman
Education and outreach KNP office together with
Community forums
partners (TNC and PT.
Volunteers
Putri Naga Komodo)
Stakeholder engagement implements most of the
available social tools:
Training
Education and outreach
Committee formation
work with local
teachers to develop a
local content curricula on
marine conservation and
regularly visit
communities to discuss
the benefits of MPAs
(park zoning) for local
fisheries
Education and outreach Institutional capacity
Community forums
building for village and
Volunteers
community forest and
Stakeholder engagement river management.
Training
Local knowledge and
Workshops
consultations will play a
Meetings
key role in the
Committee formation
development of these
Other
systems.
Increasing capacity of
the Forest Protection
Department for more
effective community
based programs,
biodiversity monitoring
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
Other
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Restoration
Preservation
Research
Other
Biodiversity assessment
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
Restoring channel flow
Research
Other
Entrance Fee
management committee.
Other
Meetings
Stakeholder engagement
Communications
Volunteers
Committee formation
educational facilities:
Research
creation and
Preservation
maintenance of a
Other
botanical trail and the
building of an information
center for environmental
education. School
children from the area,
as well as other visitors,
are taught the
importance and
significance of the
reserve.
website:
www.tresorrainforest.org
Park guards
Trail building
Tourism infrastructure
Research
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Research
Other
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Research
Ecosystem service
assessment
Biodiversity assessment
Other
Best Management
Practices
Research
Other
Biodiversity assessment
Research
Other
Other
Research
Research
Other
Provision of
environmental education
to schools and
community creates a
Education and outreach Advertise - radio,
Stakeholder engagement television, bulk mail out,
Training
& word of mouth. Phone
Workshops
calls to farmers to come
Meetings
to field days. Information
Communications
stations during breakfast
time (convenient timing,
8 total.) Farmers more
interested if you come to
them. Then after
information session,
explanation of landscape
assessment process,
and tender process.
Field Days, information
sessions, planning days
with individuals (set up
goals and mile stones)
Education and outreach
Community forums
Volunteers
Stakeholder engagement
Training
Workshops
Meetings
Research
Restoration
Other
Best Management
Practices
Infrastructure
Fire management
Biodiversity assessment
Outplantings
Ecosystem service
assessment
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Regeneration
BMP agriculture
Mapping
Best Management
Practices
Research
Other
Preservation
Restoration
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Infrastructure
Removing invasive
species
Other
Restoring riparian zone
Fencing
Pilot/demonstration
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
Preservation
Other
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Regeneration
Fire management
Legal protection
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Fencing
Trail building
Tourism infrastructure
BMP agriculture
BMP forestry
Awareness raising is a
huge focus, both about
opportunities and
threats/concerns specific
to the area. Moving
away from slash and
burn agriculture to
alternative methods,
taught why this is S&B is
not good for landscape
etc.
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Other
Research
Restoration
WWF facilitates
communities through the
process knowledge
building about policy and
requirements, action
plan writing, and
establishment of IGA
Committee formation
Scale of planning meetingsBest Management
Meetings
Practices
Stakeholder engagement
Research
Other
Restoration
Education and outreach
Preservation
Training
Other
Workshops
Community forums
Volunteers
Communications
Workshops
Training
Committee formation
Education and outreach
Stakeholder engagement
Meetings
Volunteers
Other
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Research
Restoration
Other
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Fire management
Legal protection
Research
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Fencing
Trail building
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Outplantings
Regeneration
BMP agriculture
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Reseeding
Regeneration
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Restoring riparian zone
Tourism infrastructure
Other
BMP forestry
BMP ranching
BMP agriculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Outplantings
Other
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Legal protection
Research
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Park guards
Legal protection
Research
Tourism infrastructure
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Other
Restoration
Research
Research
Pilot/demonstration
BMP agriculture
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Reseeding
Infrastructure
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Other
BMP forestry
Outplantings
Community forums
Communications
Education and outreach
building general
awareness and ability to
improve environmental
management and
pollution control
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Preservation
Other
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Reseeding
Regeneration
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Restoring riparian zone
Pilot/demonstration
Research
Capacity building in
marine and terrestrial
site protection. Training
in GPS, GIS, and MOMS
mapping skills.
Community ranger and
volunteer programs.
Health and AIDS
education. BMP
farming.
Best Management
Practices
Research
Other
Restoration
Preservation
BMP agriculture
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Ecosystem service
assessment
Reseeding
Regeneration
Infrastructure
Park guards
Fire management
Fire restoration
Legal protection
Research
Fencing
Tourism infrastructure
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Research
Restoration
Other
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Legal protection
Park guards
Infrastructure
Regeneration
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Other
Community
representation on the
steering committee for
the park, through a
rotating administrative
post among 12 groups.
- community
engagement; and
- replicating the
experiences throughout
the country.
Villa Clara is a
community that
expressed willingness to
participate in the pilot
project to test alternative
methods and practices
for fishing. Community
self selects who should
participate in pilot. About
10 crews with 35 men
each represent a small
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Preservation
Other
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Regeneration
Fire management
Legal protection
Research
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Other
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Preservation
Research
Other
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Reseeding
Regeneration
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Research
Other
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Preservation
Other
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Regeneration
Legal protection
Research
Restoring riparian zone
Other
Community education
and sensitization to the
river restoration process,
the benefits, and the
ecological significance.
The people are also
Education and outreach Park administrators,
Stakeholder engagement researchers, and
Other
partners engage the
Community forums
communities around the
park, with the goal of
mediating a process that
changes the treatment of
the protected area.
Determining the usage
needs and building
working relationships
with proprietors around
the park. The aiding in
the relocation of families
living within the park to
places outside park
boundaries.
Education and outreach The project will build
Community forums
capacity in provincial and
Stakeholder engagement local government, and
communities and
Training
produce, jointly with
Workshops
relevant provincial
Meetings
technical agencies a
Committee formation
landscape-level,
Other
province-wide
conservation-corridor
strategy, for approval by
the provincial
government. With the
help of partners,
integrating environmental
conservation into the 5
year commune
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Regeneration
Restoring riparian zone
Restoring channel flow
Floodplain restoration
Pilot/demonstration
Research
Restoration
Preservation
Other
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Regeneration
Park guards
Legal protection
Research
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Research
Preservation
Best Management
Practices
Other
BMP agriculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Legal protection
Fire management
Park guards
Infrastructure
Other
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Other
Research
Preservation
BMP agriculture
Outplantings
Park guards
Fire management
Research
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Fencing
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
BMP agriculture
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Park guards
Fire management
Legal protection
Research
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Other
Restoration
Research
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Research
Outplantings
Other
Participatory forest
management - through
planning, organizations,
and establishing links to
the Forest Department
for better cooperation.
Training and recruiting of
park rangers, forest
guards, and the staff of
local NGOs and Village
Committee formation
Creation and
Meetings
empowerment of
Stakeholder engagement community based
Training
organizations to actively
manage natural
resources in cooperation
with the management
authority in Niassa
Reserve and the Buffer
Zones.
Strengthening of
community-based
institutions, developing
Stakeholder engagement Survey of Comments,
Other
Suggestions and
Recommendations from
Training
Visitor-respondents to
Communications
Improve the Whale
Shark Interaction Tours.
Site visits and interviews
with various
stakeholders which
include the fishermen,
ecotourism service
providers, local
residents, and local
government officials
helped to inform a large
study conducted to draw
Meetings
Training
Stakeholder engagement
Community forums
Education and outreach
Communications
Provincial level:
Conservation ForumTNC proposal, adopted
by Governor,
Local NGOs: monthly
meeting, monitor status
of conservation work and
exchange information.
Train local community to
apply monitoring for
animals (plants too)
Local community has
unique knowledge of the
area; we only give them
the system to document
Stakeholder engagement Work mostly with private l
Research
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Restoration
BMP forestry
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
Outplantings
Legal protection
Fire management
Other
Research
Best Management
Practices
Research
Ecosystem service
assessment
Biodiversity assessment
Mapping
BMP agriculture
BMP forestry
BMP ranching
Research
Mapping
Biodiversity assessment
Other
Workshops
Stakeholder engagement
Communications
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Restoring riparian zone
Floodplain restoration
Restoring channel flow
Research
Awareness raising
workshops, approaching Restoration
the EU and business
leaders to educate them
about PES. This is
difficult because most
are turned-off
immediately by the term
"PES." So, stopped
referring to it as a
"payment." This was too
technical, and no one
wants to be the one to
pay this unclear and
"new" price. The
Community forums
Stakeholder engagement
Meetings
This working group
consists some NGOs,
national government
representatives and
individual who interest to
environmental services
Committee formation
Advisory committee for
Stakeholder engagement the park: various
Meetings
stakeholders- 3-4
Education and outreach community
representatives, local
district, tourism,
fisheries, NGOs,
university. Meets
quarterly: cant mandate
but can give advice.
Sends recommendations
to the Board of Trustees
(of all Tanzanian Marine
Parks) Much weaker
than needs to be. 11
people total.
Training
Board of Trustees: in
Fire management:
working with ejidos to
train in better fire
management and the
use of fire as an
agricultural tool. Some
funding comes from
government that deals
with fire control.
Technical advice to
ejidos in terms of forest
management practices.
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
BMP forestry
Ecosystem service
assessment
Biodiversity assessment
Regeneration
Other
BMP agriculture
Best Management
Practices
Research
Preservation
Other
Pilot/demonstration
Research
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Biodiversity assessment
Ecosystem service
assessment
Infrastructure
Park guards
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
Preservation
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Reseeding
Fire management
Fire restoration
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Research
Communications
Stakeholder engagement
Education and outreach
Committee formation
Communication: water
values
Support for Stakeholder
Participation:
headwaters communities
Information System:
water availability, usage
and reallocation to
include environmental
flows
Best Management
Practices
Preservation
Research
Restoration
Other
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Ecosystem service
assessment
Legal protection
Pilot/demonstration
Research
Floodplain restoration
Restoring channel flow
Restoring riparian zone
Other
Stakeholder engagement
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Preservation
Research
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Ecosystem service
assessment
Regeneration
Fencing
Pilot/demonstration
Restoring channel flow
BMP forestry
Park guards
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
BMP forestry
Ecosystem service
assessment
Restoring channel flow
Pilot/demonstration
Restoring riparian zone
BMP agriculture
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Pilot/demonstration
Restoring channel flow
BMP agriculture
14 water user
committees
Community forums
Meetings
Travel around to
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Infrastructure
Pilot/demonstration
Biodiversity assessment
Floodplain restoration
BMP agriculture
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Mapping
Restoring channel flow
Restoration
Preservation
Best Management
Practices
Research
Reseeding
Park guards
Regeneration
Pilot/demonstration
BMP agriculture
Legal protection
Volunteers
Education and outreach
Training
Regeneration
Reseeding
Floodplain restoration
BMP agriculture
Legal protection
Removing invasive
species
Restoring channel flow
Restoring riparian zone
Park guards
Regeneration
Legal protection
BMP agriculture
Outplantings
Restoring riparian zone
BMP ranching
None
Committee formation
Preservation
None
Preservation
Restoration
Research
Legal protection
Pilot/demonstration
Regeneration
Outplantings
Legal protection
BMP agriculture
BMP forestry
Pilot/demonstration
Legal protection
Regeneration
Committee formation
Regeneration
BMP ranching
Legal protection
Restoring riparian zone
Other
Community forums
Pilot/demonstration
Restoring channel flow
BMP agriculture
Ecosystem service
assessment
Infrastructure
Floodplain restoration
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Research
Committee formation
Reseeding
Removing invasive
species
Floodplain restoration
Mapping
Outplantings
Trail building
Creating seed source
(nursery)
Research
Fire restoration
Pilot/demonstration
Regeneration
Fire management
BMP agriculture
Legal protection
Preservation
Best Management
Practices
Research
Restoration
Other
Park guards
Legal protection
BMP forestry
Ecosystem service
assessment
Fire management
Tourism infrastructure
Research
Best Management
Practices
Restoration
Preservation
Legal protection
Pilot/demonstration
Research
BMP agriculture
Reseeding
Restoration
Removing invasive
species
Outplantings
Restoring channel flow
Floodplain restoration
Preservation
Legal protection
Meetings
Community forums
Stakeholder engagement
Training
Workshops
Communications
Research
Mapping
Pilot/demonstration
Communications
The Coalition includes TNC
Best Management
Committee formation
Practices
Stakeholder engagement
Preservation
Research
Restoration
Other
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
Legal protection
Regeneration
Research
Trail building
Removing invasive
species
Tourism infrastructure
Park guards
Fire management
BMP agriculture
BMP forestry
BMP ranching
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Park guards
Legal protection
BMP forestry
BMP agriculture
Other
Infrastructure
Stakeholder engagement
Best Management
Practices
Other
BMP forestry
Other
None
Restoration
Outplantings
Regeneration
Removing invasive
species
None
Restoration
Preservation
Legal protection
Reseeding
Outplantings
Committee formation
Strong environmental
education and
communication program
really thats been the
key to making the
changes working
through local
spokespeople radio
TNC and partner helped
create a committee to
manage the park:
-mayor
-civil society
representative (teacher,
etc)
-NGO (Vivamos Mejor)
-Committee of tourist
guides one rep
TNC and partner helped
form the Committee of
tourist guides
-committee of local
tourist guides maya
Preservation
Other
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Preservation
Other
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Trail building
Regeneration
Reseeding
Restoring channel flow
Research
Pilot/demonstration
Mapping
BMP agriculture
Training
Education and outreach
Other
Preservation
Research
Restoration
Tourism infrastructure
Other
Legal protection
Park guards
Mapping
Fire management
Removing invasive
species
Restoring channel flow
Research
Research
Other
Tourism infrastructure
Pilot/demonstration
Preservation
Other
Legal protection
Tourism infrastructure
Preservation
Research
Restoration
Pilot/demonstration
Legal protection
Regeneration
Workshops
Education and outreach
Pilot/demonstration
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Committee formation
Workshops
Training
BMP fishery/aquaculture
Pilot/demonstration
BMP agriculture
BMP ranching
Legal protection
Park guards
Fire management
Reseeding
Other
Agriculture
No take recreation
Rural domestic
All water users
Recreation users
All
Government
Managing organization
Managing organization
Partner organization
Ranching
Other
Agriculture
Managing organization
Ranching
Agriculture
Sustainable take
recreation
Managed forestry
Urban domestic
Rural domestic
All water users
Hydropower
Floodplain occupants
Agriculture
Recreation users
No take recreation
Ranching
Ranching
Managed forestry
Sustainable take
recreation
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Ranching
Floodplain occupants
All water users
Rural domestic
Urban domestic
All
Sustainable take
recreation
Other
Urban domestic
Rural domestic
Other
Preservation of barrier
island habitats.
Allowable fishing,
camping, birdwatching.
BMP of easement owned
ranchlands
North Africaand
hardfishing
Government
because people don't
Managing organization
have access rights and Partner organization
get paid little for the work
they do. Here it must be
a government base
program.
Governments are often ill
informed and do no
monitoring.
FSC certification
Market Support
promoting products from
WWF decided that
Managing organization
conservation objective
was to keep cattle
ranchers in business
because its an extensive
form of ag, compared to
other landuses: less
phosphorus run off per
acre, least use of ag
chemicals, most intact
ecoregional assessment Government
in 2004 with WWF
provides good
knowledge for advising
local governments and
fishermen.
Working with local
communities (fishing
industry leaders, local
fishermen, CDQ groups,
local entities (Native
implement monitoring
Government
systems of the changes Managing organization
in ecosystems (wetlands,
forests, wildlife, and
tourism impacts)
Information systems to
connect cultural and
natural characteristics
with other areas to
develop an ecotourism
replantings by local villag Partner organization
Sustainable take
recreation
Natural product
extraction
Rural domestic
Recreation users
All water users
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Ranching
Rural domestic
All water users
Sustainable take
recreation
Natural product
extraction
Other
Rural domestic
Recreation users
No take recreation
Other
Sustainable take
recreation
Recreation users
Other
Government
Managing organization
No take recreation
No take recreation
Sustainable take
recreation
Agriculture
All
All water users
Managed forestry
Sustainable take
recreation
Paper mill
Recreation users
None
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
No take recreation
Rural domestic
Recreation users
No take recreation
Recreation users
Other
Managing organization
Partner organization
Government
Other
Managing organization
closely together with the Government
regency government and
with traditional
institutions to develop a
lasting, supportive
constituency for Marine
Protected Area
management. This is
mostly done by
highlighting ecosystem
services provided by
reefs and other
nearshore habitats.
No take recreation
Recreation users
Other
Managed forestry
Agriculture
No take recreation
No take recreation
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Reforestation.
Stakeholders
identification and
analysis - (i)
wants/needs; (ii) how to
engage them?
Networking - build an
open environment to the
subject where the
necessary forest
restoration is divulged
and accepted by the
local community.
Managing organization
Government
Ranching
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Sustainable take
recreation
Ranching
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Managed forestry
Other
Agriculture
WWF shares
Government
management of the park
with DENR through a
MOA. Park guards and
allowable usage laws
help to manage the area.
Research by WWF staff
also contributes to the
knowledge and planning.
Assessment of the
fishing industry
economic generation
yielded
thatuses f Managing organization
The firstfindings
two major
No take recreation
Recreation users
Rural domestic
No take recreation
Recreation users
All water users
Guided tours,
Other
reforestation, trail
Partner organization
building, park guarding.
You pay for entrance and
then can hike on your
own, or you can pay a
little more and get a
guided tour.
No take recreation
Recreation users
All water users
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Ranching
All
Tender Activities:
Fencing of remaining
target habitats, revegetation and
protection, corridor
installment, and feral
animal control.
Alternative approaches
to desalinization such as
planting of woody
perennials were also
accepted. For example,
oil maleys for production
of eucalyptus oil are an
option that is receiving
increasing attention by
Integrated River Basin
Management (IRBM)
plans for guiding
community and industrial
BMP for the watershed.
27 Water User
Associations (WUA), 6
Community Conservation
Banks (COCOBAs),
The indigenous peoples
of the Cantingas
watershed are
undertaking anti
poaching and illegal
logging enforcement and
reforestation activities
through the water fund
provided the Local
Government and WWFPhilippines. Families
receive raffled
opportunties every 2
weeks, payments are in
the form of grocery store
credit.
Cantingas Water Fund
Managing organization
Ranching
Agriculture
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Government
Managing organization
Ranching
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Managing organization
Government
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Natural product
extraction
Ranching
Managed forestry
Ranching
Agriculture
Other
Agriculture
All
Ranching
Agriculture
Other
Agriculture
All
Promote active
Government
community participation Managing organization
in river basin/catchment Other
and natural resource
management, creation of
village and location
associations, tap into
new laws and statures
that foster participation
and regulation.
Blue print for
development and
conservation for
Koibatek and Baringo
Counties. (Integrated
Management Plan for
Switch to circle hooks to Managing organization
prevent bycatch of
seaturtles, these hooks
have not been shown to
reduce regular catch.
Fishermen are trained
and shown through
workshops how to use
circle hooks. They turn
in their J hooks and
receive (free) circle
hooks to test. Whenever
they wish, they can
switch back to their old
hooks, most keep the
circles though.
4 different approaches or Managing organization
strategies: Markets,
Partnerships,
Governance, Finance.
Global initiative, moving
toward greater
coordination of industry
(through which
fishermen will gain more
power in the market and
find more benefit from
responsible fishing).
Ranching
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
No take recreation
Floodplain occupants
Rural domestic
Agriculture
All water users
Recreation users
Other
Other
Other
Other
Sustainable take
recreation
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Rural domestic
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
No take recreation
Ranching
All
No take recreation
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Engagement of the
surrounding villagers in
outlining sustainable
usage of park resources
and planning for
management of the
protected area, through:
Conservation Awareness
campaign;
Community Conservation
Agreements - local
people develop usage
plan and agree on areas
that are suitable for use
and which should be
designated under Park
Policy development
Support park authority to
work with local
government and
communities in
developing Park Zoning
and Park Management
Plan. Both Zoning and
Management Plan were
endorsed by Central
Government (through a
Decree of the Directorate
General of Forest
Protection and Nature
Conservation No.
This project seeks to
gain a greater
understanding of
ecological & social
issues on a landscape
scale in order to develop
a province wide
conservation strategy
consisting of schemes to
conserve natural
resources and enhance
livelihoods.
Project activities include
Development of village
and community forest
and river management
Managing organization
Government
No take recreation
Natural product
extraction
Government
Managing organization
Partner organization
No take recreation
Sustainable take
recreation
Natural product
extraction
Other
Other
Managing organization
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Rural domestic
No take recreation
Natural product
extraction
Recreation users
Other
Sustainable take
recreation
None
Rural domestic
All water users
Recreation users
Hydropower
No take recreation
Other
Recreation users
Other
SASI: traditional
open/closed season to
allow growth of stocks
entrance fee
Environmental education
program: joint with CI,
The Flows Partnership - Government
Army Corps, TNC, & the Managing organization
Caddo Lake Institute
Partner organization
work together to manage
water flow into the lake.
The restoration of the
timing, magnitude, and
duration of ecological
flows from Big Cypress
Bayou is critical to
Caddo Lakes
sustainability.
Land acquisition was the
main strategy in the past.
TNC also facilitated the
process and framework
for the partnerships.
The best way to manage thi
Managing organization
No take recreation
Recreation users
Other
No take recreation
Other
When diving in
Tubbataha, everyone
must follow the Park
Rules and Regulations.
Entry fee for
conservation: The
revenue from tourism
activities is used to
Managing organization
Conclude the
management and
conservation plan as
prepared by the
community with
assistance by CCC &
WWF. The next few
years will be focused on
strengthening local
capacity for
environmental
management,
fundraising, & managing
funds.
Managed by WWF
Gabriel has been doing Managing organization
seaturtle nesting
monitoring for the past 3
years, his local presence
and trustworthiness
created a acceptable
environment for WWF's
efforts to be received by.
Frequent monitoring and
protection primarily by
the locally recruited
"Leatherback Boys"
Many unique social tools
(festival, soccer game)
catalysed a real turn
Other
Recreation users
Managing organization
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Managed forestry
Implementation of the
project using the existing
institutional set up at
village and district levels
has proved to be an
efficient way of involving
key players to
128 landholders have
Managing organization
been involved in the
process.
Private landowners
propose price for land
management changes
(advised by
recommendations by
LPLMC). LPLMC staff
visit and assess sites.
Maximize benefits from
BMP for greater
catchment, rank
accordingly, and contract
with most influential
bidders. Payments are
made depending on
The project is in the
Government
process of developing a Managing organization
detailed monitoring
framework to be used for
the EACFE Strategic
Framework for
Conservation (20052025) and the WWF
EACFE Strategic Action
Plan (SAP).
WWF helps with
awareness raising about
land ownership policy as
well as capacity building
for alternative income
generating activities and
micro- financing.
Floodplain occupants
All water users
Hydropower
All
Agriculture
Floodplain occupants
Sustainable take
recreation
No take recreation
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
All
Managing organization
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Rural domestic
Agriculture
Other
Natural product
extraction
Ranching
All
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Other
Agriculture
Rural domestic
Other
No take recreation
Other
No take recreation
Other
Other
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Other
No take recreation
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Other
No take recreation
Government
Partner organization
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Sustainable take
recreation
Other
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Government
Managing organization
Natural product
extraction
Other
Other
Rural domestic
Develop understanding
of hydrologic-landscape
dynamics, key areas &
their stakeholders, and
industries that are major
pollution sources.
Facilitate best
management practices
among farmers and
fishermen.
This project supports the
government of
Mozambique to
strengthen operational
and conservation
capacity within the
Quirimbas National Park.
WWF lends mainly
technical advice and
budgetary supervision
through the government
and local NGO AMA, as
well as engaging in many
subsequent projects
focused on issues like
fisheries management,
biodiversity conservation
and human conflict
mitigation, habitat
management, research,
&
human
development.
Habitat
protection,
local
participatory
conservation efforts, and
adoption of
environmentally
responsible fishing
techniques.
Research on fish stock
availability and potential
alternatives for harvest,
eg. sea sponges.
Increasing fishing stocks
and fish availability for
local communities:
development of
No take recreation
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Urban domestic
Hydropower
Agriculture
All water users
Recreation users
No take recreation
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Natural product
extraction
Recreation users
All water users
Other
Sustainable take
recreation
Agriculture
Other
Project activities:
Help to create village
forest reserves with legal
status. Designate,
survey, map, inventory of
resources, develop
management plans and
harvesting schedules.
Community conservation Managing organization
part of larger
Government
landscape conservation
scheme. There are a
number of protected
areas but not a sufficient
amount. This project
works at the provincial
level to identify gaps and
possible areas where
forest can legally be
placed under village
ownership and
management as a
protected yet working
forest.
Forest management In
One of the basic
Government
strategies of this project Managing organization
is to engage local
Partner organization
leaders and decision
makers to do better
watershed management.
Through various tools
such as policy or
economic incentives,
landowners with a strong
land ethic will be
encouraged to improve
and protect the
watershed.
Policy measures may
include land use
Analysis and
Government
development of possible
responses by the project.
Biodiversity and
ecological surveys
indicate hotspots for river
restoration.
Incorporating this data
with policy and
community inputs aides
in the formulation of
recommendations.
Collaboration with
stakeholders to identify
common priorities in
environmental
Managing organization
The park is coadministered by the
State and other
organizations, but
managed mainly by The
Defensores de la
Naturaleza.
Activities and
partnerships include:
Better demarcation of
park boundaries
Facilitating the updating
of private lands
Relocation of families to
outside of the park
Master Plan of the Maya
Biosphere Reserve
WWF Greater Mekong
Managing organization
contract with ADB for 28
months till 2008.
Biodiversity conservation
is very contingent on its
potential to also bring
economic growth and
return. This project
leans heavily toward
development due to its
funder. More poverty
alleviation and land
management than
ecosystem connectivity.
First phase intended to
select local villages for
economic investments
No take recreation
Hydropower
Rural domestic
Urban domestic
Agriculture
Recreation users
Floodplain occupants
Other
Natural product
extraction
No take recreation
Recreation users
Rural domestic
No take recreation
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Rural domestic
Improve management
Government
practices by supporting Managing organization
government in law
enforcement, patrolling
in the areas, restoration,
tree planting in village
areas, & boundary
demarcation.
No take recreation
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Recreation users
All water users
Government
Managing organization
No take recreation
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Managing organization
Government
No take recreation
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Urban domestic
Other
Spread improved
agricultural practices to
reduce rate of
conversion & reduce
unnecessary burning.
Facilitate Kenya Forestry
Service in creation of a
This is a multi-phase
project being
implemented in three
different villages within
the reserve: Mussoma,
Naulala, and Negomano.
The first phase of the
project ended in
December 2005 and the
second phase is
currently underway. This
project is intended to
develop a comanagement approach
The World-Wide Fund
for Nature (WWF) has
been assisting the
municipality of Donsol
since 1998. Now, as
part of the Sulu-Sulawesi
Marine Eco-region
Partnership for
Sustainability Program,
WWF is working to
promote the community
based management and
development of
ecotourism
The project generally
aims to:
Spread best fishery
Collaborative
management
Managing organization
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Rural domestic
Other
Agriculture
Ranching
No take recreation
None
Floodplain occupants
All water users
No take recreation
Sustainable take
recreation
Ranching
Floodplain occupants
4 Major Targets:
Carbon
Water
Biodiversity
Landscape beauty
Government
Other
Hydropower
All water users
Rural domestic
Urban domestic
Sustainable take
recreation
No take recreation
Other
Recreation users
Other
Rural domestic
Ranching
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
Other
Rural domestic
Managing organization
Program Framework
Communication: water
values
Support for Stakeholder
Participation
(headwaters
communities)
Rational water use:
demonstrative pilot
projects
Institutional
strengthening: Water
governance
Information System:
water availability, usage
and reallocation
Protected areas dont
have funding for basic
management, fund
management. Part of
the watershed is owned
by small land owners.
Establish conservation
agreements like zoning
of the land to keep their
productive acitivities. like
cattle and agriculture in
specificaareas
that will
Create
trust fund
where each water user
will allocate funds to
invest in conservation
activities.
Partner organization
Managing organization
Agriculture
Other
Ranching
Government
Managing organization
Ranching
Agriculture
Other
No take recreation
Government
Managing organization
Managed forestry
No take recreation
Agriculture
Agriculture
Agriculture
All water users
Floodplain occupants
Creating a monitoring
framework. This will
basically measure water
quantity & quality,
landuse changes, natural
vegetation
cover.
After Government
TNC is hoping
to implement
Agriculture
Sustainable take
recreation
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Rural domestic
All water users
Floodplain occupants
Urban domestic
Ranching
Agriculture
Managed forestry
All
No take recreation
Agriculture
Sustainable take
recreation
Ranching
Urban domestic
All water users
Agriculture
Ranching
No take recreation
Urban domestic
Hydropower
Rural domestic
Bottling plant
All water users
Government
No take recreation
Urban domestic
Rural domestic
Managing organization
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Ranching
Agriculture
All
Ranching
Agriculture
Agriculture
Agriculture
Floodplain occupants
Ranching
Agriculture
Ranching
No take recreation
All
Agriculture
No take recreation
Managed forestry
All
Other
Ranching
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Urban domestic
All water users
No take recreation
Floodplain occupants
Urban domestic
Rural domestic
Recreation users
Sustainable take
recreation
Managed forestry
No take recreation
Urban domestic
Managed forestry
Agriculture
No take recreation
Urban domestic
Rural domestic
Agriculture
All water users
Recreation users
Sustainable take
recreation
Managed forestry
Agriculture
Other
Agriculture
Managed forestry
Ranching
No take recreation
No take recreation
Managed forestry
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
All
Natural product
extraction
Agriculture
All
Sustainable take
recreation
No take recreation
All
No take recreation
Sustainable take
recreation
All
Sustainable take
recreation
No take recreation
Agriculture
Agriculture
No take recreation
Floodplain occupants
Recreation users
Sustainable take
recreation
Agriculture
Recreation users
No take recreation
Urban domestic
Agriculture
Recreation users
No take recreation
Recreation users
Rural domestic
No take recreation
Recreation users
Rural domestic
No take recreation
Agriculture
Lots of environmental
education programs.
ALso hiring of park
guards for preservation
as well as encouraging
BMPs for coffee,
ranching, and Palma
camedor harvesting.
They are also doing fire
management with some
prescribed fires.
There is also some
reforestation and
restoration occurring
No take recreation
Ranching
Agriculture
Government
Managing organization
Partner organization
Domestic User
Non-profit
Committee/Community
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Government
Non profit
Government
Implementing NGO
Government
Non-profit
Domestic User
Other private
landowners/users
Implementing NGO
Government
Non profit
Community/committee
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Other NGO
Non-profit
Industrial/Corporate user
Domestic User
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Government
Recreation users
Agriculture
Forester
Government
Community/committee
Private land user
Government
Rural domestic
Committee of
stakeholders
Non-profit
Domestic User
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Government
Recreation users
Community/committee
Private land user
Non profit
Other private
landowners/users
Implementing NGO
Committee of
stakeholders
Committee/Community
Non-profit
Domestic User
Tax payer
Committee of
stakeholders
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Rancher
Federal tax payers
State tax payers
Government
Rancher
Committee of
stakeholders
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Non-profit
Federal tax payers
Industrial/Corporate user Hydropower
Non-profit
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Government
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Domestic User
Implementing NGO
Industrial/Corporate user Recreation users
Non-profit
Government
Other corporate
Industrial/corporate
Private land user
Forester
Agriculture
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Other corporate
Tax payer
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Government
Federal tax payers
State tax payers
Non-profit
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Government
None
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Community/committee
Rural domestic
Non-profit
Domestic User
Tax payer
Other NGO
Implementing NGO
Government
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholders
Non-profit
Domestic User
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Recreation users
Industrial/corporate
Private land user
Other corporate
Rural domestic
Non-profit
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Government
Government
Government
Non-profit
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Government
Non profit
Implementing NGO
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Government
Other corporate
Agriculture
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
None
Other private
landowners/users
Paper mill
Tax payer
Government
Non-profit
State tax payers
Industrial/Corporate user Federal tax payers
Forester
Implementing NGO
Paper mill
Industrial/corporate
Paper mill
Non-profit
Tax payer
Implementing NGO
Government
Domestic User
Tax payer
Government
Government
Federal tax payers
Non-profit
Domestic User
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholders
Domestic User
Recreation users
Government
Community/committee
Municipality
Committee of
stakeholders
Domestic User
Government
Government
Domestic User
Recreation users
Industrial/Corporate user Other corporate
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholders
Tax payer
Domestic User
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Agriculture
Government
Municipality
Domestic User
All water users
Industrial/Corporate user Other corporate
Government
Private land user
Municipality
Other private
landowners/users
Recreation users
Federal tax payers
Domestic User
Recreation users
Government
Government
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholders
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholders
None
None
Tax payer
Agriculture
Rancher
Domestic User
Agriculture
Industrial/Corporate user Other private
landowners/users
Hydropower
All water users
Government
Community/committee
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Non-profit
Tax payer
Community/committee
Private land user
Other private
landowners/users
Committee of
stakeholders
Implementing NGO
All water users
None
None
Tax payer
Non-profit
Agriculture
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Tax payer
Non-profit
Agriculture
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Domestic User
Tax payer
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Recreation users
Federal tax payers
Community/committee
Private land user
Other private
landowners/users
Committee of
stakeholders
None
None
None
None
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
None
Domestic User
Recreation users
Committee of stakeholders
None
Community/committee
Private land user
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Rural domestic
Government
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Government
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Private land user
Other private
landowners/users
Committee of
stakeholders
Domestic User
Rural domestic
Government
Government
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Municipality
Tax payer
Non-profit
Domestic User
Recreation users
Implementing NGO
State tax payers
Federal tax payers
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Non profit
None
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholder
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Industrial/Corporate user Other corporate
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Committee of
stakeholders
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Tax payer
Non-profit
Agriculture
Rancher
Domestic User
Recreation users
Industrial/Corporate user Rural domestic
Non-profit
Urban domestic
Other corporate
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Forester
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
None
None
Domestic User
Municipality
Industrial/Corporate user Government
All water users
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Committee of
stakeholders
Agriculture
Rural domestic
Committee of
stakeholders
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholder
Tax payer
Government
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholders
Domestic User
Recreation users
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Tax payer
Recreation users
Industrial/Corporate user Municipality
Domestic User
Hydropower
Urban domestic
Government
Forester
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Domestic User
Government
Community/committee
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Recreation users
None
None
None
None
Domestic User
Government
Industrial/Corporate user Rural domestic
Tax payer
Hydropower
Other private
landowners/users
Forester
Tax payer
Agriculture
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Government
Tax payer
Government
Agriculture
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Tax payer
Non-profit
Government
Other NGO
Implementing NGO
None
None
None
None
None
None
Domestic User
Recreation users
Industrial/Corporate user Other corporate
Community/committee
Government
Municipality
Committee of
stakeholders
None
None
None
None
Rural domestic
Agriculture
Rancher
Community/committee
Private land user
Rural domestic
Committee of
stakeholders
Domestic User
Recreation users
Rural domestic
Government
Government
Tax payer
Government
Domestic User
Other private
Industrial/Corporate user landowners/users
All water users
Other corporate
Government
Government
Domestic User
All water users
Industrial/Corporate user
Government
Government
Government
Government
Tax payer
Agriculture
None
None
Non profit
Private land user
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Rancher
Domestic User
Tax payer
Non-profit
Agriculture
Implementing NGO
Rancher
Community/committee
Government
Non profit
Committee of
stakeholders
Government
Implementing NGO
Implementing NGO
Federal tax payers
All water users
Tax payer
Government
Municipality
Domestic User
All water users
Industrial/Corporate user
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholders
Domestic User
Forester
Implementing NGO
Domestic User
All water users
Industrial/Corporate user
Community/committee
Private land user
Rancher
Agriculture
Committee of
stakeholders
Non-profit
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Rancher
Agriculture
Implementing NGO
Government
Non profit
Implementing NGO
Municipality
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Non-profit
Forester
Agriculture
Rancher
Other private
landowners/users
Non profit
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Domestic User
All water users
Industrial/Corporate user
Community/committee
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Government
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Tax payer
Non-profit
Other private
landowners/users
Other NGO
Tax payer
Forester
Other private
landowners/users
Forester
Other private
landowners/users
Agriculture
Tax payer
Non-profit
Government
Private land user
Municipality
Other private
landowners/users
Community/committee
Non profit
Private land user
Other private
landowners/users
Rancher
Agriculture
Committee of
stakeholders
Implementing NGO
Non-profit
Energy Company
Industrial/Corporate user Other NGO
Non profit
Private land user
Community/committee
Agriculture
Forester
Other private
landowners/users
Other NGO
Committee of
stakeholders
Non-profit
Other corporate
Industrial/Corporate user Other NGO
Agriculture
Forester
Rancher
Committee of
stakeholders
Non profit
Government
Implementing NGO
Government
Implementing NGO
Agriculture
Committee/Community
Non-profit
Committee of
stakeholders
Other NGO
Implementing NGO
Industrial/corporate
Energy Company
Non-profit
Tax payer
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Non-profit
Domestic User
Other NGO
Implementing NGO
Recreation users
Community/committee
Private land user
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Committee of
stakeholders
Tax payer
Domestic User
Recreation users
Federal tax payers
Municipality
Other private
landowners/users
Tax payer
Non-profit
Rancher
Agriculture
Other private
landowners/users
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholder
Domestic User
Recreation users
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholder
Tax payer
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Federal tax payers
Other private
landowners/users
Implementing NGO
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Industrial/Corporate user Other corporate
Agriculture
Non-profit
Domestic User
Other NGO
Rural domestic
Community/committee
Private land user
Government
Other private
landowners/users
Government
Committee of
stakeholders
Non-profit
Implementing NGO
Other NGO
Community/committee
Committee of stakeholder
Valuation/analysis
On the ground implementation
On the ground implementation Valuation/analysis
Broker involved Comment on payment exchange
Eonomic Valuation Included
Timing of Economic Valuation
stakeholders
Its a loan or credit provided to rural households to start up environmentally sound forms of alternativ
There are multiple tiers of payment going on in this region. Some is let out for logging and agricultu
Funds generated from sale of goods from community forests and hunting grounds as well as ecotou
Yes
During project
During project
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
Pre-project
funding comes from TNC, the government, and other local NGOs.
stakeholders
During project
tourism companies generate income from taking visitors to the reserve. these private businesses of
The land belongs to the state of Washington so the lease payment goes to them, however, the state
There isn't really a payment program set up for usage. Money is spent of BMPs and improving the d
landowners/users
Pre-project
Funds generated from sales of NTFPs and ecotourism will go to individuals in the community.
stakeholders
Yes
Pre-project
landowners/users
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
Pre-project
stakeholders
water users pay fee to trust fund managed by a committee of stakeholders. Cleaner production for
The Local Water Drinking Company belongs to the local government but will receive payment by the
Pre-project
During project
stakeholders
Pre-project
stakeholders
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
Yes
WWF won funding for this pilot project from the Australian and State Governments. It set aside 200
No
During project
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Conservation covenants
can be bought by either
the DEC and added to
the national reserve
system, or by the NT for
WWF is like a broker
between covenant
organization and
landholder.
WWF pays an average
of $800/site for the WA
herbarium to do a floral
survey.
Conservation covenants
can be bought by either
the DEC and added to
the national reserve
system, or by the NT for
During project
No
various forms of income generation for local communities or receipt of funding for natural resource m
No
Pre-project
Pre-project
stakeholders
Yes
During project
No
During project
No
Pre-project
No
Yes
During project
Yes
Yes
During project
During project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
No
Yes
During project
landowners/users
Yes
During project
landowners/users
Yes
During project
Yes
Pre-project
Pre-project
bank loans
Yes
During project
Keenjhar - Buyer is
probably the local
government in Karachi,
that deals with supply of
urban water.
Yes
During project
Yes
During project
Currently, processing
companies negotiate
with districts on some
rattan supply quota and
the various local
communities are
expected to then supply
this quantity. This goes
without regard for what is
a sustainable amount or
life-stage to take from.
Aim is to connect supply
and demand parties so a
more responsible trade
relationship can evolve.
No
stakeholders
No
During project
During project
Yes
Yes
During project
No
Yes
During project
No
Yes
During project
payment exchanges may occur as a result of some of the alternative livelihood initiatives, however P
No
No
Yes
Payment schemes are
not identified yet and are
still in the development
process.
Potential relationships
suggested from a
scoping study regarding
PES:
Watershed protectionproviders: Dakrong and
Huong Hoa Nature
Reserves & Catchment
residents, to users:
Farmers (irrigation,
Industry (as input, as
product), Government
agencies, Hydropower
plants and their
Various governmental incenYes
During project
During project
No
Government may offer payment (money and materials) to landowners who occup
landowners/users
No
In the process of developing a sustainable financing mechanism to enhance the livelihoods of peopl
No
Besides some local IGAs, there is no major payment exchange for ecosystem services.
No
Yes
During project
landowners/users
Payment to landowners, who are primarily shepherds, not to sell their land for agricultural conversio
During project
Yes
During project
No
Money generated by Tourism and fishing fees must be used within Mafia MPA. Government manag
No
During project
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Money from water fund will go to park rangers to pay for watershed management.
Yes
During project
Pre-project
During project
No
During project
Yes
FONAG is administrator
of the Fund. They
decide how the money is
spent within the park and
whether it goes into
education of the
community or
reforestation or other
improvements within the
park area.
Yes
Yes
stakeholders
Yes
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
/Note: This includes both the original purchase of land (TNC and Gov't paid private landowners/agric
No
Pre-project
No
Right now there is no one getting paid for the services but TNC is using tax paying money as well as
No
The exchange here is that the State and the City (NYC) both use revenues to purchase land and ea
No
No
Yes
Yes
Pre-project
Pre-project
Yes
During project
No
Indigenous communities and are receiving the money from the NTFP goods and donors in order to p
No
No
Pre-project
No
A committee of stakeholders came together to raise money to pay for the dam. The committee is ca
No
No
The NGOs are trying to implement a user fee program, but even without it they are building capacity
No
Pre-project
Pre-project
No
No
The fee system was set up by TNC using USAID and TNC money to build capacity but essentially it
Yes
No
TNC is leveraging funds from private sources and government sources (NOAA) to invest in commun
During project
Yes
The fisher fund is a collection of money that has been invested. Fishermen can now access that mo
Yes
Pre-project
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Outcome of valuation
Use of valuation Type of economic valuation Services valued
mentally sound forms of alternative income generation. There's also an emphasis on improving households by installing more efficient ene
is let out for logging and agricultural production by private corporations who pay the government for the land. Some payment goes to comm
hunting grounds as well as ecotourism will go to directly benefit individuals or the collective communities.
Simple
None
Leverage partnerships
Simple
Motivate legislation
Change land user
practice
Leverage partnerships
Simple
Travel cost
Simple
Simple
Total
Simple
None
erve. these private businesses often employ and use the knowledge of local people to guide these tours though.
t goes to them, however, the state department of Ecology is also a funder for this project so the government both pays and gets payment fo
Simple
Contingent valuation
(WTP)
Simple
Motivate legislation
None
Motivate legislation
Simple
Aesthetic
eholders. Cleaner production for the contributing industries will be managed by the Guatemalan Center for Cleaner Production (partner org
ent but will receive payment by them. Payment may be in the form of funding or human development.
Set fees
Redirect money to
conservation
Simple
Simple
None
Simple
None
Simple
Contingent valuation
(WTP)
te Governments. It set aside 200,000 AUD total for payment to private landholders for land tender agreements. These payments would be
Cost/benefit
pt of funding for natural resource management come from the government, supporting organizations (like WWF or SNV), or regular buyers o
Leverage partnerships
Simple
Change industry practice Cost/benefit
Motivate legislation
Redirect money to
conservation
Change land user
practice
Change industry practice
Simple
Aesthetic
Simple
Aesthetic
None
Simple
Motivate legislation
Simple
Change industry practice
Redirect money to
conservation
Ramsar Site
Leverage partnerships
Simple
Carbon Sequestration
Redirect money to
conservation
Set fees
ecotourism may not be the best strategy at this time Travel cost
Hedonic pricing
Cost/benefit
on-going
Replacement cost
Cost/benefit
Carbon Sequestration
Redirect money to
conservation
Leverage partnerships
Change land user
practice
Change industry practice
Motivate legislation
Cost/benefit
Simple
Total
IGAs to target
PES development
Set fees
Travel cost
Change land user
Contingent valuation
practice
(WTP)
Change industry practice
Redirect money to
conservation
Leverage partnerships
Simple
Carbon Sequestration
Agriculture water
quantity
Agriculture water quality
Domestic water quantity
Domestic water quality
Recreation water quality
Recreation water
quantity
Aesthetic
Flood mitigation
Industrial water quality
Industrial water quantity
Total
Simple
None
Set fees
Motivate legislation
Change land user
practice
Redirect money to
conservation
Leverage partnerships
Total
Motivate legislation
Change industry practice
Change land user
practice
Leverage partnerships
Redirect money to
conservation
Total
Motivate legislation
Change land user
practice
Change industry practice
Redirect money to
conservation
Set fees
Change land user
practice
Redirect money to
conservation
Leverage partnerships
ecosystem services.
heir land for agricultural conversion or housing development. Not decided who will pay.
Cost/benefit
Flood mitigation
working on it
Simple
d management.
$x wasted
Cost/benefit
Hydropower water
quality
Domestic water quality
Recreation water quality
Agriculture water quality
Flood mitigation
Industrial water quality
Carbon Sequestration
Hydropower water
quality
Domestic water quality
Agriculture water quality
Recreation water quality
Industrial water quality
Hydropower water
quality
Domestic water quality
Agriculture water quality
Recreation water quality
Industrial water quality
Simple
Cost/benefit
Simple
Shadow cost
Replacement cost
Flood mitigation
Gov't paid private landowners/agriculture) and the mitigation bank (corporate groups pay the government).
using tax paying money as well as other money to restore the ecosystem to generate services.
evenues to purchase land and easements and influence management in the Catskills area. Thus, they are using tax dollars to fund forest p
Simple
Set fees
Simple
Carbon Sequestration
for the dam. The committee is callled the Penobscot River Restoration Trust which consists of the: Atlantic Salmon Federation, Penobscot
Contingent valuation
(WTP)
General revealed
preference
without it they are building capacity so that recreation users have to pay for visits and the money will be reinvested in the community.
to build capacity but essentially its a fee system in which users pay and the money goes directly to the community. Park guards are federa
Set fees
Cost/benefit
Aesthetic
urces (NOAA) to invest in community-based shellfish reef restoration projects. Money sometimes goes to pilot projects and other times to p
ishermen can now access that money for various community-based fishery recovery programs. Note: Also includes mention of fishermen p
Hydropower water
quality
Flood mitigation
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Yes
cost of fire
water appraisals for
baseline requirements &
demand pinch points to
create a system with
districts to trade water
when its needed and
trade it away when its
not.
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
If this can be included, poaching is a large threat to the restoration efforts, which means that that product being produced (oys
Yes
Pre-project
certain mushrooms as well as the Chines Ghost Moth are very valuable and fetch high costs at market, their sustainable mana
During project
Pre-project
Pending
During project
Yes
During project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
Water Act
Working For Wetlands
ments. These payments would be distributed by the Natural Resource Management Regional Council, whom the tender contract was signe
Yes
Addresses: landuse
change as the best way
to solve core problems
(eventual degradation of
water quality in San
Fernando, Sibuyan,
Romblon) & payments
as a sufficient incentive
to motivate landuse
change.
Option: Payments for
ecosystem services
(PES)
By,
Yes
During project
Yes
During project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
Valuation of wetland
plants only at specific
sites. Some other
researchers are looking
at usage by frequency
and amount traded or
harvested.
During project
During project
Yes
Yes
Yes
Pre-project
Socioeconomic studies
going on in 3 local areas.
Project on Legal and
Institutional Framework
and Economic Valuation
of Resources and
Environment in the
Mekong River Region: A
Wetlands Approach.
synthesized a collection
on national policy
frameworks
Mar 06-07, a town the provided nature treks reported 14 tours, 45 tourists, and $691 profit. The elephant tours reported 2203
extreme poverty
threatens the park as
surrounding villagers
may over use natural
resources (this happens
to many national parks in
the area).
Economic valuation can
be a useful tool to
motivate protection and
legislation, this is a top
priority for the p
During project
During project
CI did a basic coastal rural appraisal/economic study for the entire Raja Ampat area.
the United States thirteenth Wetland of International Importance by the Ramsar Convention
During project
Yes
During project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
A willingness to pay
study was conducted in
1999. It compared
TRNP to other sites and
survey takers were
asked to choose from 3
different fee am
Commissioned- pre
feasibility study for
ecotourism business, 'Is
it even a possibility for
this community?'
Outcome- very unlikely
that this would be good
business, only a minority
would make a profit.
Created a model
simulation for a
ecotourism busines
Revealing value in
protecting the seaturtle's
is the key to this project,
both economic as a
ecotourism attraction
and cultural as a unifying
symbol.
This is a typical Costa
Rican community with
much foreign influence
and external pressure to
develop.
Yes
Regional agricultural
Yes
production and
processing are estimated
to be worth $280M/year.
During project
Pre-project
Environmental Benefit
Analysis matrix ranks
proposals in ecological &
biological importance;
bids are selected using
this criteria.
Recent loss in
profitability and l
Yes
Pre-project
Pre-project
Yes
During project
Yes
During project
During project
Legal designation of WM
During project
Integration of district
objectives with park
management plans.
Work towards creation of
national recognition of
Jamursba MPA
During project
Yes
During project
Yes
During project
Yes
Pre-project
Creation of Sustainable Fi
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
1 national teak
planation and private
owned tea estate
Agriculture - 2 types of
crops: food and cash (for
sale locally w/in country.)
Fire wood demand - for
curing tea, cater to by
tea drying/processing
indust
Yes
Yes
Yes
During project
Reservation of right to in
- Visitor Arrivals
- Average Daily, Monthly
and Annual Boat Trips
- costs and benefits of
capture fisheries and
ecotourism
- willingness-to-pay
(WTP) survey was
conducted in May 2005
to determine how much
visitors interacting with
the whale sharks are
Yes
Pre-project
Yes
During project
No valuations yet,
however, this is the main
reason for the project.
interested in undertaking
an assessment of the
economic value for
biodiversity conservation
for low intensity
agriculture.
related Carpathian
Opportunity Project need to understand s
Stumbling block is
evaluation, and who will
pay.
Al Appleton (Consultant)
- Catskills-New York City
water supply.
Use to convince
insurance companies or
governments to pay for
restoration or else they
will suffer increasingly
because of climate
change and repeat
flooding
Cost of traditional flood
protection and damage
by flooding compared to
cost of protecting ecosys
Pre-project
Yes
During project
Tourism is developing
and visitor rates are
increasing: from 1,000
people to 5,000
people/year. New
investors interested in
diving, resorts, and tours.
Pre-project
Chihuahua - feasibility s
Yes
During project
opportunity cost study: how much people value clean water, willingness to pay (done by a university student).
Yes
During project
Yes
Yes
Pre-project
Redistribution of taxes to
Yes
Pre-project
Stakeholder analysis to
identify relevant policy
tools to engage
stakeholders in process,
creating leverage for
legislation, funding,
stakeholder buy-in, need
for change, etc.
TNC partnered with the National University in Costa Rica to do a local valuation study. They did a social economics study ev
re using tax dollars to fund forest protection by private landowners in the mountain area.
Right now what they are doing is setting up a survey in partnership with a professor from Central Connecticut State University.
Another Economic valuation study in 1994 (by TNC) assessed one hectare of land valley value $500 but same hectare not ir
Economic valuation of the Carbon value was projected. TNC took conservation projection 300 tons/acre and PowerTree wa
ic Salmon Federation, Penobscot Indian Nation, Natural Resources Council of Maine, TNC, Trout Unlimited, American Rivers, Maine Audub
Pre-project
Pre-project
To pay people in the field, calculate direct costs (cooking, administration of lodge, and guides, etc) so all considered there and
Pre-project
o includes mention of fishermen paying for fishing rights in Landowner Transition Comments.
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Valuation/analysis
Use of policy analysis Policy analysis comments Ecological analysisEcological analysis comments
Yes
robust ecological
monitoring of plants,
animals (birds, large
mammals, butterflies,
birds) , and tree cover
(spp, and size) by WWF.
Also, training of local
park managers to do like
monitoring on their own
by use of GPS satellite
systems.
There are 6,000
Created in January 2000, the park is a result of the commitments made by the
Stakeholder buy-in
Motivate legislation
Yes
neo-tropical migrant
birds baseline studies
anadromous fish
vernal pools
blue oak woodland birds
largescale vegetation
patterns and changes
assumptions about
ranching, experimental
grazing systems
deer herds
Motivate legislation
Motivate legislation
Reveal need for policy
change
Motivate legislation
Stakeholder buy-in
ID policy to target
Reveal need for policy
change
Motivate legislation
ID policy to target
Yes
Yes
Yes
that product being produced (oysters) are of high economic value Yes
Motivate legislation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Motivate legislation
Motivate legislation
Yes
Yes
Environmental Flows
Research Program looks
at riparian plants and
algae.
Modeling of the water
flows (for potential
agriculture).
Effects observed on
animals (birds, reptiles,
mammals) due to
woodland clearing.
Yes
Motivate legislation
Yes
Yes
Stakeholder buy-in
Soon
Yes
Over 30,300 ha of
wetlands have been
assessed
South Africa is a very dry
country with only
470mm/year rainfall.
12% of the country does
not have access to
potable water.
hom the tender contract was signed with and progress reports
Yes
Environmental flow
studies: this is a
perennial river, so when
it runs dry something is
wrong
vegetation/landuse map
cover pattern of change
from 1976 through 2006.
If there is no appropriate
conservation
intervention, the total
erosion rate will increase
by 28 percent in 25
years from the present
rate of 293,267 tons per
year. More importantly,
Yes
Yes
New policies and legislative reforms have recently been introduced by the government of Mozambiq
Motivate legislation
The elephant tours reported 2203 rides, 3989 tourists, and $23
Yes
Yes
Komodo National Park falls under the jurisdiction of District Manggarai Barat.
Motivate legislation
ID policy to target
Ecological assessment
in 2003, Raja Ampat is
rich in marine marine
biodiversity.
Conservation priorities:
coral reefs are resilient
and rich in coral reef
species. Habitat for
whales, dolphins, turtles,
etc.
Data collection: following
up the ecoregiona
Yes
Water Quality
Management Program
by the Texas
Commission on Env.
Quality.
USGS - lots of hydrologic
& wildlife monitoring.
Nutrient loading (mercury
etc.) cause
overproduction and then
eutrophication of the
lake. Unnatural nutrient
levels can also faci
ID policy to target
Stakeholder buy-in
Motivate legislation
Yes
ation that strengthens the park's prote There is a need to reconci Yes
WWF - Philippines
described Tubbataha as
probably the most
important marine
protected area in the
Sulu Sea.'
1998 bleaching event
hydro study: fish larvae
and coral larvae are
circulated within Sulu
Sea and to near by reef
of mainland Palau (a
very imp
ID policy to target
Stakeholder buy-in
In Tanzania the
Yes
institutional frameworks
that structure the
interactions of people
and forests and wildlife
are largely an inheritance
from the colonial
governments (CEPF
2003).
Until recently, protection
focused on watersheds
rather than biodiversity
an
Decade of Landcare
from 1990 to 2000.
Motivate legislation
Stakeholder buy-in
ID policy to target
ID policy to target
Yes
Yes
Motivate legislation
Motivate legislation
ID policy to target
ID policy to target
Yes
There is no legal
framework for parks and
therefor none for
conservation work done
within.
In 2002, government of
Mozambique declared
the Quirimbas
archipelago a national
park in response to a
request from local
communities and other
stakeholders who
Motivate legislation
Reveal need for policy
change
Motivate legislation
ID policy to target
Decentralization of gover
Yes
ID policy to target
Reveal need for policy
change
Motivate legislation
Yes
Motivate legislation
ID policy to target
Reveal need for policy
change
Yes
Yes
Illegal settlement
threatens to fragment the
80% of province that is
already connected.
Biodiversity reviewputting everything on a
map, low, med, & high
biodiversity value, to do
a threats analysis.
1/3 of the involvement is
contracted to WCS for
rese
Yes
of WWF (local communities and other Since the end of civil war
Yes
Yes
Motivate legislation
Yes
Yes
Yes
Parks in Tanzania
managed by a core
Central government
presence with a back up
by community
involvement.
Yes
Longterm monitoring of
reef ecology
Pearl oyster (primarily
WWF)
Realize that Protected
Areas are not sufficient
to sustain biodiversity
and ecosystem services,
must use ecoregion
approach. (eg. can just
overfish all around MPA
and stocks will suffer)
Yes
Follow up economic
valuation study with
increased policy
advocation. Promote
public and private
investment and improve
the use of government
funds in the forest sector
(managing funds given
for more effective
improvements).
Mexican law states that
all
Over 300
species/hectare, Spanish
cedar and mahogany
(timber important). Not
specific
Idea is VOLUNTARY
payment from big cities
to implement
management in
headlands.
Legal framework does
not allow local
governments to allow for
environmental charges
though.
iversity student).
Motivate legislation
Yes
Motivate legislation
Stakeholder buy-in
ID policy to target
Reveal need for policy
change
Stakeholder buy-in
Motivate legislation
Motivate legislation
Yes
Stakeholder buy-in
ID policy to target
Reveal need for policy
change
Motivate legislation
did a social economics study evaluating how much the society could pay and how to distribute that money. The study demonstrated that
ntral Connecticut State University. The survey will be of forest landowners in the borderlands to determine the price point (their willingness t
alue $500 but same hectare not irrigated; if has irrigation $10,000 value of water. Value of land based on water understand rationale of e
Yes
300 tons/acre and PowerTree wanted to use 450 tons going to be more a conservative effort. Sold the carbon for about $2/ton in a lump
Motivate legislation
ID policy to target
Reveal need for policy
change
Motivate legislation
s, etc) so all considered there and then there is a 30% extra for lodge not sure about the % but something discussed in the consortium an
Motivate legislation
Reveal need for policy
change
In many cases, because of sea floor ownership TNC has to do a policy analysis to understand what
Compliance monitoring
What Biodiversity
included is being
How
monitored
is Biodiversity
forIn
compliance
how
being
many
monitored
locations
for
iscompliance
biodiversity being monitored for complian
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
on Inlet and the Woodard Bay were identified as optimal and strategic sites for Olympia oyster restoration by both local shellfish biologists a
or project creation. Saw that there was still a chance to conserve to the native biodiversity. Site ranked high in ecoregional planning, many
the total biomass are indicators for ecosystem services like water filtration and habitat generation.
habitats need fire cycles or build up of fuel causes massive fires and is destructive to the system.
pid Ecological Assessment (2002) reported that Southeast Misool, one of the major Raja Ampat Islands, has outstanding biological diversity
Yes
ver in India has been assessed as 67.83 million hectares and constitute 20.64 per cent of its geographical area in 2003. The total forest co
tudies of the whole northern Montenegro area have been done in the past 1.5 years. These have highlighted 4 key regions for attentions, D
l America supervised and coordinated CINPEs groundwork with Defensores de la Naturaleza; CINPE research has confirmed that that is a
udy done to determine which rural areas to target with their respective stewards.
hat the Apo Reef area sustains the fisheries of all 9 barangays in Sablayan. This is also a place for seasonal bird nesting and egg laying.
Yes
taff Officers would do a detailed site assessment target sites of their environmental and biodiversity status. Vegetation structure, condition,
Yes
esigned for extension worker to work with local person to do an easy assessment in the field. Basic science assessment. Concentrates on
d by the government of Mozambique that enhance the role and rights of local communities in the management and products of natural reso
eady in the regions where WAP is starting programmes. They have already conducted a major biodiversity study from which WAP will use
f Xe Pian's natural resources that could potentially draw tourism like wildlife (birds, mammals, reptiles), forests, culturally significant sites etc
early an important habitat for many species that live in the park, as well as water source of many people.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
h is considered the most important place for hawksbill seaturtle, and the second most important for leatherback nesting in the Caribbean.
Yes
wa Mountains are home to many rare and endemic species of flora and fauna (see Lovett & Wasser 1993 for a review). The montane forest
of endemic and/or threatened coastal forest and non-forest species show no negative trends in population dynamics.
rsity and socio-economic surveys were done in the area during the first phase of the project (1996-99).
s: lots of good land draws pressure from rubber and bio fuels industries etc. (both foreign contractors & joint ventures).
in the area agreed that the Madang lagoon had very important ecological and biological attributes that should be protected against overfish
I partnership focused on the Birds Head region has been working on gathering scientific data on many marine and coastal issues to be use
F - Japan was initially involved by the Japanese Ministry of the Environment to select and do scientific data and population dynamics on the
Yes
e of the East Usambaras houses some of the most important and threatened biodiversity in Africa. This area is also home to many people
ieve that the Province's Kelay River watershed is home to over 10 percent of the world's remaining wild orangutan population. Due to its de
aluation in the Carpathians to help a) design an ecological network and b) to promote entrepreneurial actions to support biodiversity conserv
ots of mapping
risk (drought days and minimum safe yield) vs. habitat improvement/increase (square meters) for trout, american shad and the endangered
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
olicy analysis to understand what rights and abilities they need to get before they can enact the projects.
annual
by both local shellfish biologists as well as TNC Washington marine scientists. Restoring the oysters will also help restore the natural
igh in ecoregional planning, many aquatic conservation targets mussels, rare cave fauna. 150 species of native fishes, very diverse
as outstanding biological diversity and stunning marine and terrestrial habitats. Misool harbors reefs that show high survival from the 1998
1998
Daily
l area in 2003. The total forest cover has increased slightly, mainly due to the increase in open forests ( canopy density 10-40 %); but
hted 4 key regions for attentions, Durmitor-Tara is one and chosen for its high biodiversity.
earch has confirmed that that is a positive relationship between the cloud forests of SMBR and ground and surface water supplies for surro
s. Vegetation structure, condition, composition, proximity to other areas, weeds, visible salinity, feral animals, fire regime. The si
ce assessment. Concentrates on different species harvest, amount in sites, and supply in terms of utilization. Simply supply versus dem
ment and products of natural resources life wildlife and other ecosystem services. These
for a review). The montane forest includes local endemic botanical species such as Drypetes gerrardininioides and the shrub Zimmermann
n dynamics.
int ventures).
ould be protected against overfishing and other destructive practices. When they voiced this to the people, they agreed and worked toward
arine and coastal issues to be used in the management and zonation of Abun Marine Protected Area, which includes Jamursba Medi and C
a and population dynamics on the islands of the mainland of Japan. 80 sites were nominated for research, using Flyway Shorebird & wetla
area is also home to many people who rely directly on the landscape for their survival. The forest cover of this area is declining due to c
angutan population. Due to its dependency on the three focus forest types, the orangutan has been identified as a "flagship species." S
ons to support biodiversity conservation. Hoping to overlay ecosystem services with other biological attributes to identify the critical
merican shad and the endangered dwarf wedgemussel (calculated using a habitat model decision support system) was essentially at the co
TNC or BLM?
grassland health
Must submit a report to the government at the end of every year that track
Fish catch
FSC regulations on
operations
compliance of IPs on pr
No deforestation
Illegal use
e Ecosystem
In how
Services
many locations
being monitored
are Ecosystem
for Compliance
Start
Services
date forbeing
Ecosystem
monitored
Frequency
Services
for compliance
compliance
of Ecosystem
monitoring
Services compliance monitoring
20 ranches
1997
annual
2006
at the end of every year that tracks the activity on each conservancy. These are reports of wildlife taken (hunted etc) and must comply with
every 6 months
nd when it happens it is by foreigners who want to make the quick cash by selling the eggs to local bars.
Yearly
Park guards
TNC staff
FRESP
FRESP
hunted etc) and must comply with quota limits assigned by species and state of population from year to year
FRESP
FRESP
ments on Ecosystem
WhatServices
Socioeconomic
compliance
factors
How
monitoring
are
are being
Socioeconomic
monitored
In how many
factors
for locations
compliance
being are
monitored
Socioeconomic
for compliance
factors being monitored for co
adaptive landscape management- yearly assessments determine grazing schedule for ranches with conservation easements.
catch amount has declined from 10 kilos/day to 2 kilos/day, much more sustainable.
8 districts
ranger observation
harvesting quotas, wildlife community ranger patrols, the Camtrakker, which detects heat and motion
resource use
park rangers
creation of sanctuary has notable conservation & livelihoods impacts. Residents now catch more fish of better quality, and cert
Ensuring there is no
illegal logging occurring.
Cinergy paid for 3 years
then DNR absorbed
A major part of the project was to train park guards and tour operators how to try to police for illegal park entrants since this wa
1996
rangers
rangers
ker, which detects heat and motion much like a burglar alarm, and the Trailmaster which takes a picture when its infra-red beam is broken.
daily
more fish of better quality, and certain species have returned after disappearing due to overfishing come back!
ho analyzes Socioeconomic
Who performs
compliance
Socioeconomic
Samples
End compliance
date for Socioeconomic
DataWho
analysis
pays
compliance
for collection
monitoring
of Socioeconomic compliance data
Yes
Yes
for example, a local honey making enterprise with over 400 workers can g
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Monitoring on the
number of blast incidents
heard by rangers from
terrestrial post-guard
indicated that destructive
fishing practices have
reduced significantly due
to a combination of
regular patrol and
awareness.
Prior to regular patrol, on
average, ra
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
at Biodiversity is being
How
monitored
is Biodiversity
forIn
Performance
how
being
many
monitored
locations
for
isPerformance
biodiversity
Start
being
datemonitored
for Biodiversity
for Performance
Performance Monitoring
Mega Fauna
surveys
Wildlife dynamics
1990
rare plant species, salmon species, baseline neo-tropical bird, woodland birds, botanical composition, deer herds
oyster recruitment
reef health
coral health and cover, reewater temperature data collector and park guards who do fish counts on top of WWF experts
plant species
Greater Kudu
sightings, trends
Many wildlife- flamingos,
various bugs as
indicators of
environmental quality,
other ungulates,
mountain goats etc.
Komodo Dragon
protected area effectiveness, populations of key species like Saola, primates (gibbons and dukes), tigers, the Edward pheasan
flora, fauna
survey
REEF HEALTH
corals, fishes,
seagrasses, seabirds,
marine plankton, and
marine mammals, such
as dolphins and whales
observations
manual counts
1982
fish populations
2006
oximately 80,000 hectares per year, the population growth in the Guatemalan Petn is 7% to 10% per year
Elephant populations
aerial surveys
reef, mangroves
Vegetation mapping
Rare species
communities
Baseline completed
Vegetation monitoring (%
cover) both City and
TNC
Rare species monitoring
by both
Vegetation, butterflies, mosquitos, biting flies, mammals, amphibians, reptiles, fish, water fowl, birds, aquatic invertebrates
Invasive species
Birds
Habitat quality
Fire
every 2 yr
2 yr cycles
annual
monthly
twice a year
TNC
once a year
nt/river basin
WWF, local government staff, Ornithology Department of government, Herbarium, local universities
annual
Tubbataha research and monitoring team, as well as many other researchers who come to the site
regular basis
annual
WWF
WWF
Annually, summer
TNC and City of Eugene TNC and City of Eugene TNC and City of Eugene
TWI, Mac Murray College, Univ of IL Springfield, TNC, IL Nat Hist Survey
TNC
bimonthly
Vivamos Mejor
o performs BiodviersityEnd
Performance
date for Biodiversity
Data analysis
Who
Performance
pays for Biodiversity
Monitoring
Who
Performance
pays for Biodiversity
data collection
Performance sample analysis
continous
TNC
TNC
WWF Denmark
grassland (on ranches) health pre-post burn, cattle grazing patterns, large
successfully remove rats from Anacapa Island, restoring balance to the ecosystem and resulting in a
TNC will take sediment cores to look at the invertebrate community at both restored and control site
Frye is in the beginning stages of the project, they've laid the shell and are waiting to see if it works.
water quality
A lot of attention is being paid to the monitoring different aspects of the lands purchased. TNC - Atla
reef health
spawning aggregation
sites
resource utilization
See "Aquatic conservation values of the Daly River Catchment, Northern Territory, Australia."
Approximately 180
water quality in swamps, lake, and river areas.
sightings of Greater
Kudu, largest count ever
in LBNR.
Routine monitoringweekly, mainly from local
government staff, of lake
level, water quality,
occurrences of flamingo
death, and other issues.
Quarterly monitoring toooften inc
Forest health
rate of conversion
hydrology
regular patrol
a number of studies
carbon sequestration potenliterature and landscape reviews
have been done so far
by researchers of the
National Herbarium of
the Netherlands,
department Utrecht,
Physical geography
(UU), the Natural History
Museum in Paris and the
IRD (Institute for
Developmental
Research) in Cayenne
The Herb
In 1982, a combined
fish catch
team from the
Government and the
University of the
Philippines Marine
Science Institute carried
out one of the first
scientific surveys of
Tubbataha.
Marine turtle monitoring efforts were started in 2003 by the Caribbean Conservation Corporation (CC
of leatherback
(Dermochelys coriacea),
black turtle (Chelonia
mydas agassizi) and
olive ridley (Lepidochelys
olivacea) nests have
been successfully
protected and
experience almost no
plundering.
10,000 leatherbacks,
black turtles and olive
ridleys hatche
assessments of endemic
and/or threatened
coastal forest species
within target landscapes
show no declining
population trends over a
10 year period.
population assessments
of endemic and/or
threatened species
within non-forest habitats
show no declining p
- connectivity of marine
protected areas in
Indonesia, climate
change resilience,
protection of endangered
species.
- seaturtle nesting,
poaching, and trade
dynamics.
observation
Cat Tien National Park has the most mammal species of any park in Vietnam.
Vegetation surveys
marine santuaries, elephant populations
cybertracking capacity
within the park (a system
that uses computerlinked GPS reading to
track animal movements
GIS maps of the park
study of food security
within the PNQ,
particularly with respect
to the impact of
elephants
wild dog s
Landscape changes
Landscape OAM
database, water sources,
natural resources,
sources of income,
houses. compiled for 3
villages. Surveys done
for 2 years.
Elephants have been
moved to reduce conflict
with farmers etc.
Monitoring plots through
aerial surveys to asses tr
Fish caught
Carbon credits
Water quality
Carbon offsets
All the plantings (and the Carbon sequestration poteIrregularly using Texler and Associates, Inc prot
Survivorship of trees
Nothing has yet been officially decided but the Trust is trying to determine how to create a Penobsco
There is a monitoring
Water quality
program in the park
conducted by Vivamos
Mejor water quality,
birds, habitat quality
(bees), forest fires.
Monitoring is done
bimonthly.
To get money from the
forest cover law
landowners also need to
do inventories of the
flora
In the Rancho posos azuleWater quality and quantitypH, Salinity, turbidity and other basic water qua
Monitoring did CAP make biodiversity health monitoring program 7 conservation targets bas
Water quality
annual
burn, cattle grazing patterns, large scale vegetation patterns and changes, vernal pools
TNC, UC Berkeley
MacArthur Agroecology R
o the ecosystem and resulting in a rebound of all native species on the island, from seabirds to herpetofauna.
y at both restored and control sites to compare. Also monitor the repopulation success on the laid cultch.
twice a year
once a year
Sablayan
WWF
oes out on boats with fishermen for days or sometimes weeks and monitors numbers of seatWWF staff, local NGO partner staff
185 sites for reef health, 1996 for reefs, 1998 for
entire coast
landscape reviews
2006
Alterra
ocal fishermen
ean Conservation Corporation (CCC), in conjunction with a large group of local, national and international project partners and donors. The
4 WMAs
2002
annual
WWF scientist
Saga University
in Vietnam.
ction Assessments; Disturbance Transects; Landscape Output Assessment Methodology (LOAM); TFM tracking tool
Fisherfolk, LGU
WWF
k International methods
4 times a year
overland flow
725
Irregular
termine how to create a Penobscot River Science Committee which will consist of scientists and environmental groups to determine what to
Throughout river
2004
continuous
bimonthly
FDN
am 7 conservation targets based on these targets based monitoring program. Not yet under implementation but monitoring some spec
ho analyzes Ecosystem
WhoServices
analyzesPerformance
Ecosystem
WhoServices
data
performsPerformance
Ecosystem Services
End
Samples
date Performance
for Ecosystem
Data
Services
analysis
Performance monitoring
same
continuous
same
professional laboratory
WWF
TNC, CI
Alterra
project partners and donors. They have been patrolling since 2003, and recruit l
WWF
WWF
ental groups to determine what to monitor and how often - look at fish, mussels, et
Resource Commission
ntation but monitoring some specific things local management groups take information h
s for collection of
Who
Ecosystem
pays for Services
Ecosystem
Performance
Services
Who pays
Performance
data
for Ecosystem
sample
Comments
Services
analysis
Performance
on Ecosystem
dataServices
analysisPerformance monitoring
Conservation covenants
are monitored by a
1/year phone call and a
visit every 3 years.
Birds are attracted to the
bush and act as natural
pest controls
Conservation covenants
are monitored by a
1/year phone call and a
visit every 3 years.
Birds are attracted to the
bush and act as natural
pest controls
tracking socio-economic ch
Tidal flats
a three-month-long study
on fisheries of Quirimba
Island
an inspection visit of the
oyster beds within the
sanctuary at Matemo
(accompanied by Jason
Rubens of the Mafia
Island Oyster Project in
Tanzania) revealed a
great many oysters
present
Looking at habitat
change and vegetation
cover at the landscape
level.
ICRAF is a partner in this
monitoring.
Fishermen catch
monitoring to draw a
baseline of the fish stock
We like to know catch
numbers so taught
fisherfolk how to monitor
and report their fish
catch.
Developed standardized
forms of reporting to
streamline process.
fisheries monitoring
Some monitoring of
services such as:
* associated services
such as shoreline
migration (a function of
how much an intertidal
reef may be protecting a
shoreline from waveinduced erosion)
ioeconomic factors
How are
are being
Socioeconomic
monitored
In how many
factors
for locations
Performance
being are
monitored
Socioeconomic
for Performance
Start
factors
date for
being
Socioeconomic
monitored for
Performance
Performance
monitoring
income and benefits to local communities have totaled about 3.98 million dollars
our operators that offer services in the reserve originate from the surrounding villages of Placencia, Monkey River, and Hopkins. The village
oup called the Green River Watershed Watch that consists of 50-60 volunteers who monitor the water quality of the river. Local researchers
perception monitoring
survey
Attitudes of divers
Feedback to resorts
jobs created
watershed landuse
1976
educed catch of turtles when using circle over j hook while not hurting (and even sometimes benefiting) catch numbers.
as a tool known as MOMS monitoring oriented for management system. Through this system there is a collection of data related with the u
monitoring showed that percentage of coral coverage inside the park has increased from 15% in 1996 to 26% in 2002. Reef health monitorin
al Survey does a lot of the monitoring in the area, they are supported in part by TNC funding.
atory (Netherlands) conducted a research study on the absorption and retention of carbon throughout the Trsor reserve. The research pred
f the research carried out since 1997 show that the condition of the fishes and corals of Tubbataha and other sites, such as Jessie Beazley
monitored annually by involves different key stakeholders. Degraded areas, tree cover in the village land, incidences of illegal logging and
sentiments of people
livelihoods
ty has been increased by development of aquaculture nurseries in the freshwater dam near the coast. 89 cages have been installed which
issues like education, agri questionnaires on socio-e 258 households were inte July 1, 2006
fishermen's loan
surveys
program
community attitudes and
perception
household economics
ng plan will be developed once final design for fisher slough is complete. Data will be collected and paid for by multiple partners including th
and the State do water quality monitoring at multiple points along the waterway and do it continuously and have been for about 10 years. B
ays for planting and monitoring. Every 5 years for first 20 years monitored. Once know species composition and survivorship, can use grow
so has to be done for the regulatory process - for example, the Historic Preservation Commission wants to make sure that archeological com
y and quality are measured for the whole protected area. The National University created and gave the equipment to the Government (CO
monitoring work with NGOs to figure out the quality of the water and birds and the health of the forest they do this every two years
quency of Socioeconomic
Who
Performance
collects Socioeconomic
monitoring
Who analyzes
Performance
Socioeconomic
data
Who analyzes
Performance
Socioeconomic
data
Performance Samples
y River, and Hopkins. The villages, particularly Placencia have benefited tremendously from the tourism activities in the reserve. M
lity of the river. Local researchers also monitor. Monitoring has a lot to do with funding availability and volunteer williingness.
tch numbers.
collection of data related with the use of all natural resources occurring in the archipelago, like small scale fisheries, collections of land
6% in 2002. Reef health monitoring is conducted every two-year at 185 sites and three different depths for each site (4, 8 and 12 m) the me
Trsor reserve. The research predicts the capacity for carbon sequestration for each type of major landscape in the park, based on data a
her sites, such as Jessie Beazley and Cagayancillo, is improving. Cagayanon fishermen have reported that fish catch in their waters has
, incidences of illegal logging and forest fires, village buffer zone woodlots, number of trees planted and surviving, number of Villa
9 cages have been installed which allowed creating thirty-five new jobs, all of them occupied by women. Family fish farms in small ponds a
WWF
WWF
or by multiple partners including the tribes, conservation district, WSU, DOE, TNC, SRFB, EPA, etc. These details will evolve over th
d have been for about 10 years. Basically at every bridge they can install a monitoring system. The City has to maintain certain level
on and survivorship, can use growth models. Monitoring some soil carbon, but mostly above ground.
Monsanto
performs Socioeconomic
End Performance
date for Socioeconomic
Data
Who
analysis
pays
Performance
for collection
monitoring
of
Who
Socioeconomic
pays for Socioeconomic
PerformancePerformance
data
sample anaylsis
lunteer williingness.
Challenges/lessons
Challenges/lessons
Development of
management plans for
Boumba-Bek and Nki
national parks
Negotiating user rights of
indigenous forest people
within national parks
Reactivating Mambale
convention between
professional hunters and
local communities
Implementation of
TRIDOM (t
Language barriers
Mistrust in the concept of
conservation
Establishing network for
community based forest
enterprises (community
forests used for revenue)
long term funding for consmaintaining touch with rural landowners and re
Information systems to conThere are no precedents in China, must learn from examples abroad. Th
This was a fairly complex survey that maybe simplified in the future
to measure performance
of outreach programs;
monitoring tool to
quantify attitude and
community perception
toward condition and
natural resources use.
use as communication
tool, formal research to
present to resource use
managers in Raja Ampat
as well as
Diver's comment all the ti Insuring that the money is There are concerns among those paying the fe
The water fund should function autonomously due to the numerous stake
The breakdown or loss of The task of finding a way to manage a lot of terrestrial carbon sequestrati
Its still very important that WWF remain as a supporter of the Park becau
over 2,000 people employed and trained in job and liWetland workings: they ar
water allocation offices a Some people still think water is a free thing
The landuse change analysis of the two (2) watersheds inside the ancestral domain was done with t
Social evaluation: 2005 appreciative inquiry, most s Public versus private interest. Dispute between
Social evaluation: 2005 appreciative inquiry, most s Public versus private interest. Dispute between
Sida does evaluation every year on strategies used by at various project sites. Its an evaluation of m
It is a status symbol to ea
number of village land use plan developed and impleMajority of communities are unaware on the im
general observation of shi Training and education are huge time and money commitments for the or
Pressures on coastal fore Working with many differenThe use of different langu
Concern that benefits fro In terms of surveillance and resource management the
Initial stakeholder
analysis to see which
groups to engage and
target - coastal area:
fishermen, children.
Young people were
leaving the area because
they could not find jobs.
Park management
conducts annual park
evaluations.
WWF monitors and
produces reports on:
Research, Community
Development, Law
Enforcement
(Fiscalizao), and
Administration
Socio-economic impacts and changes in living standards. Try to get an understanding of the comm
Monitoring: socio-economic and performance indicators measured every year through group intervie
Have trouble getting stringent easements on land than are desired by land
Monitoring for the economic changes for the landowners showed a marked increase in profits from b
Challenges/lessons
Challenges/lessons
Challenges/lessons
Challenges/lessons
Process challenges
Data needs
Economic challenges
Political challenges
Inaccessibility
Wildlife inventories of pr inadequate funding (EstabSetting up transparent management institutions
Hostilities from economic
operators
The marginalization of the Comprehensive scientific Logging concessions couldCameroonian law prohibits
When there is a drought, More vigorous monitoring. Dramatic increases in landProspect of construction o
the grassbank suffers
along with its patrons
(can't do anything about
the weather.)
Maintaining vigorous
monitoring program, fund
raising, dealing with
economic stresses
(including drought.)
ouch with rural landowners and reachi comprehensive data sets for making assumptions, long term strategizing, feedback loops for ecosys
lack of funding
learn from examples abroad. This is difficult yet important because there is no park system in China, only reserves (no use). This is a hug
viewing wildlife not as useless pest but as sources of income and livelihoods.
un-coordinated, illegal levies raised by local communities for live-aboard dive vessels challenge the implementation of a more
ncerns among those paying the fee that the money is spent on the right things
of PES: If we use broad definition, there are several PES like p Lack of funding for conse The position of Government is not in favor of an
Connecting the interests Durmitor is up for World HGenerating a sustainable sWorking at multiple levels of government and in
Needing to have a trustworthy governing body made the creation process quite The
d fee needed to be backed by law, this also t
Good management and use of the money buy the indigenous peoples ma
It is physically and knowledgeably demanding to assess a wetland. Thus the MWP along with its partners has come up with a
It is very complicated to
measure improvements
or changes in water
services.
Monitoring the practices
of landholders is also
hard, but might prevent
any cutting of corners
(eg. planting of
convenient non native
plants instead of the
recommended vegetatio
ancestral domain was done with the use of Landsat imageries taken in 1976, 1993 and 200 The political platform is that water is free, to im
private interest. Dispute between the The Wheatbelt area is stillFunding is low for providi Old versus new landclearing policies. Old land
private interest. Dispute between the The Wheatbelt area is stillFunding is low for providi Old versus new landclearing policies. Old land
the boundary, local people dont always agree with government, plantations expanding be This year we want to integrate conservation po
Each different issue tends to have different partners, making coordination compPolicy work on the higher level but each case d
WWF Tubbataha Project An understanding of the resource use patterns and moti
There is a need to reconcile overlapping policie
Research Team has
gathered baseline data
on Basterra Reef in May
2002 (it is important like
Tubbataha and Beazley),
however, its unprotected
status leaves it open to
illegal fishing activities.
The biggest challenge is how to insure that the local Funding is inconsistent.
Funding sometimes fails toThe impact of timber demand from the Far Eas
Insuring that village action plans for forest reserves There is much oil and mineral exploration going on in Tanzania. Also, a g
Project length is not enou Economic valuation of the rattan sector in the 3 counWorking with 3 different governmental systems
Trying to work with tuna and energy companies, however due to staffing problems we haven't had not much interaction.
The lengthy process of drafting policies and other legal documents may delay the outcomes of policy re
Logistically very
complicate and
expensive to implement
the Elephant mitigation
project. No value in
letting elephants roam
plus huge losses when
they damage people's
crops makes developing
a conservation program
difficult.
HEC is a challenge:
perfectin
The main challenge will be to insure the longterm future for the changes made dMovement and action through the political bodi
The Vietnamese
government views itself
responsible for the
development and
management of many
aspects of society. It has
a tendency to rely of
taxing to generate
funding for rural
development instead of
exploring market options.
every year through group interviews. Things like level of income,Funding is limited to very Coastal forests are not ranked too highly in prio
specific issues and there
are many gaps leaving
some issues unattended.
Many people resort to cut Getting Lesan properly protected at the highest
Weakness from general management: employees not motivated, not paid well, poor staff capacity, lack resources like funding,
For several million hectares of forest lands, the trend is toward decline or
ts on land than are desired by land owner, so there is some tensi Most funders require
their money to be spent
on conservation in
perpetuity, which means
that those funds cannot
be used for most types
of direct payments. In a
sense, TNC is stuck with
easements and fee
acquisitions.
Need funds
(endowments) for
managing
The ability of people to pay for their water use in local, poor towns is not v
Restoration cannot be full because of the invasive species. The system is so altered it's impossible to fully restore it.
risks to organization and how can we be sure they are getting a fair price
One of the poorest areas so hard to train them about basic hygiene and serviceHard to get legislation passed at National level
a marked increase in profits from both BMPs in ranching and BMPs in agriculture. They monitored changes in costs and changes in profits.
Challenges/lessons
Challenges/lessons
Summary stuff
Summary stuff
Scientific shortcomings
Lessons learned
Acres purchased
Money raised
monitoring and mapping togiving people an alternative source of income that they can manage and cultivate independently has
Existing studies cover only a part of the park. The absence of a documentation centre, a monitoring system, and a geographic
Working bi-nationally to prThe 1.5 million-hectare (3.6 million-acre) Laguna Madre Conservation Are
no real valuation done yet, still working on the cork oak stopper market etc.
must work with stakeholders like fishermen and local communities to combat endangered species in
y reserves (no use). This is a huge challenge because there is no precedent. Balance development and conserv
Community level management works very well because the people understand and care most abou
The numbers (of fish) aren't going down like many other places.
Engaging the community in understanding the value of the oyster population is important, PS Resto
$ 383 million
nwealths are reluctant to punish poacheRestoration is possible, encourage state efforts, poaching is a big problem (but then again is a meas
This was a simple and logical opportunity to modify a system where conservation and management
These Pride campaigns are in the developmental process and are adapting while they work. Outsid
nge the implementation of a more user- In doing conservation works, the involvement of local communities and local government has been v
was just elected, so getting him on the same page and in cooperation will be a new task.
of Government is not in favor of any large scale PES projects for forest ecosystem services as evident from their responses in various forum
The soil mechanics are veScience should be the basis for creating any sort of sound payment for ecosystem services scheme
10 years ago there was no problem with the water flow, now, if there is rain the water flow dries up w
Many more things need to The only efficient way to make things work and produce positive results is to engage and gain suppo
ed to be backed by law, this also takes Spreading the fee through the entire tourism community instead of just divers was a better way to ge
ater management program when funding runs out (there is very little funding from government).
ew landclearing policies. Old landclear By bringing in a botanist to survey the private landowner's property is raises in
ew landclearing policies. Old landclear By bringing in a botanist to survey the private landowner's property is raises interest and awareness
ment Strategy (important for rehabilitation and improvement of livelihoods, which would lead to accelerated conservation)
Fragments of this approach have been applied broadly in North America and Europe with great suce
There is need to intensify capacity building for local communities, as well as to identify alternative in
In the process of creatin Most of the partners were already present in the programme's areas. This alliance is a step toward
No consistent environmentBiggest complaint is that there are not enough tourists visiting the area. People must have a sustain
want to integrate conservation polices Carbon sequestration has huge promise and challenge. Not just horizontal, but need vertical engag
Tragedy of the commons principle - fishers realized that over-exploitation and destructive fishing hav
n the higher level but each case depen We are working at the correct political level, that is provincial governments. Vietnam is very decentr
2479 hectares
ed to reconcile overlapping policies and national laws as they apply to the park. In particular, the NIPAS Act and SEP Law both apply to the
The community has come to value the turtles beyond their economic worth.
The success of this program comes from it being so strongly supported by the local community. It is
pansion of large sugar cane plantationsThe involvement and use of local resource persons in awareness raising and information dissemina
f timber demand from the Far East has The active involvement
of a wide range of
stakeholders has
accelerated the pace of
programme
implementation as tasks
are shared and
stakholders have gained
by way of learning and
adaptive management.
This also reduces costs.
It is possible for
communitie
on going on in Tanzania. Also, a growin With the shifting status of land ownership to communities it becomes very important that they plan s
Environmentally harmful situations develop because people have been marginalized. Overusing oth
This is a realistic and successful strategy that could be replicated in other cities.
This project focuses on linkages between economic develop and conservation. Starting by doing w
d action through the political bodies is This project must not only demonstrate the feasibility but also the necessity of making changes in th
There is a need to work more closely with development agencies whose specialty is livelihood devel
There is science available It is important to demonstrate the feasibility of other water supply alternatives to present to commun
ding water protection and development of water streams are under lots of pressure. Traditional approaches to flood management are trum
Impending development
like the construction of
hydroelectric dams,
waterway alteration,
urbanization, and the
influx of residents pose
new threats to the park.
ts are not ranked too highly in priority Many issues span the entire region, so a landscape scale approach is required. Especially determin
There is the opportunity to compare, contrast and apply lessons learned from WWFs work in Bazar
system service evaluation, and then who will pay for the protection of these wetland ecosystems.
PES is a difficult topic because most are turned-off immediately by the term "PAYMENT for ES." So
Need voluntary buyers and government support to sustain this sort of agreement.
pacity, lack resources like funding, still Lots of mobile fishermen with bigger boats who are not regulated, so nothing left for smaller scale lo
nds, the trend is toward decline or less than maximum economic potential. This means less funding for forest managers creating a threaten
Success with buying land and leasing. This allows TNC to hold land out of development, get some in
Being successful involves good luck and serendipity. The Wetlands partnership worked well for sev
er use in local, poor towns is not very high. Trying to implement a fee when people cannot afAbout $100,000
bank. The hope is to get $300,000/year in interest and get $500,000 from industries per year which is the $800,000 they need to secure wa
Project can generate benefits for conservation, mitigate climate change, and help community develo
e sure they are getting a fair price since there really is no market is $2/ton OK? Cant give away anything of value so lots of internal discus
5000 hectares
250,000 USD
Summary stuff
Summary stuff
Summary stuff
Summary stuff
ge and cultivate independently has shown to be a successful solution to over exploitation of other natural resources.
nitoring system, and a geographical information system makes it hard to assess the status of animal populations and how the whole ecosys
20
1 mile
100
e understand and care most about how best to take care of their lands. The sense of ownership and self determination is a very strong and
problem (but then again is a measure of the value of oysters in the area).
e conservation and management of nature can be paid for and enjoyed by a preexisting market.
adapting while they work. Outside advice on community and economic development strategies may help improve the program.
and local government has been very crucial. Bottom-up process has been a very powerful tool to achieve our goals.
m their responses in various forums. However, the existing policies are not contradictory with the introduction of 'PES-like' projects i
esults is to engage and gain support for the local communtities. Volunteering to clear invasive species or patrol against illegal fishing could
x100s
3,005
35
y is raises interest and awareness in the entire family (usually) about their own lands. They are often very interested in the details of their ho
d conservation)
merica and Europe with great sucess. This project seeks to coordinate and apply these methods on a global scale.
as well as to identify alternative income generating activities. This is being done by the project through training local communities in differen
as. This alliance is a step toward more cooperation and a joint effort towards a shared goal. Coordination and combination of resources wi
area. People must have a sustainable buyer of their services in order for this tool to be effective.
oitation and destructive fishing have severely threatened their fisheries, and MPA (through no-take zones) is a good tool to improve and sus
rnments. Vietnam is very decentralized and each province implements policy as it sees fit. The province is the relevant decision making le
Act and SEP Law both apply to the park and is being reconciled, through the TRNMP Bill, to come up with stronger institutional mechani
orted by the local community. It is about livelihoods and self-esteem, this goes far beyond money.
raising and information dissemination was very effective in the implementation of awareness activities as well as in land use planning proce
es very important that they plan smartly because of the importance of the natural services these forests provide.
been marginalized. Overusing other resources because available land is too poor. High time preference: BAU- this process will escalate. I
beginning to manage the whole forest. There's a debate about whether NTPFs keep people poor or could bring a lot of income IF they ar
nomy law local governments have more power than in the past. Traditional rights also play an important part in policy. It is for these reason
n other cities.
conservation. Starting by doing widespread assessments and trying to lay the groundwork and establish opportunities for work like this in th
necessity of making changes in the fishing industry. The sustainability of fisheries is too important to neglect.
whose specialty is livelihood development. That way we can divide responsibilities and more acute expertise can be applied where needed
alternatives to present to communities who have plans to develop facilities of their own along the river. Also, decisions must be grounded in
es to flood management are trumping alternative options. More integration and involvement from stakeholders and NGOs may help the go
h is required. Especially determinant of success is the capacity of government institutions to implement sustainable forest management op
arned from WWFs work in Bazaruto and the Quirimbas National Park, both in Mozambique, where people are also living within protected a
y the term "PAYMENT for ES." So, stopped referring to it as a "payment." This was too technical, and no one wants to be the one to pay th
t of agreement.
d out of development, get some income, and then implement management when the lease ends if they're ready.
ds partnership worked well for several reasons. The Plan was multi-objective so incorporated the concerns of multiple stake holders. The p
about 816,000
1,200
Summary stuff
Summary stuff
Summary stuff
Change in floodChange
risk
in pop of endangered species
Change in water quality
Summary stuff
Jobs created
500-600 households
unknown
patrol against illegal fishing could not be done without their help.
5 wetland ecologists in g
42 households
n and combination of resources will hopefully bring large impacts on wetlands and co
is a good tool to improve and sustain their fisheries. However, the level of obedi
is the relevant decision making level. Local policy level for local issues. T
100
well as in land use planning process. Participatory planning and monitoring was quite
BAU- this process will escalate. Improve living standards creates a platform for chang
uld bring a lot of income IF they are well managed. They provide many services like medic
part in policy. It is for these reasons that the best way to impact an area is to start
opportunities for work like this in the future. Not any specific target yet for outcomes
ustainable forest management options for communities who depend on these resources f
one wants to be the one to pay this unclear and "new" price. The presentation of t
s of multiple stake holders. The partnership thought about implementation from the st
about 20
Summary stuff
Summary stuff
784