Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248465453
CITATIONS
READS
13
36
3 authors, including:
Yiming Fu
Pu Zhang
Hunan University
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 20 July 2009
Accepted 16 December 2009
Available online 21 December 2009
Keywords:
Composite material
Fiber volume fraction
Interlaminar stress
a b s t r a c t
Various functionally graded design methods have been proposed recently for ber reinforced composite
plates. The laminates with variable ber spacing along the thickness direction are focused on in this
paper. Fiber volume ratio distribution functions are dened separately in each single layer. Classic state
space method as well as differential quadrature state space method are utilized here for different boundary and plied conditions. For the latter method, a sub-layer based scheme, which has both high accuracy
and less numerical capacity, is suggested for functionally graded plates. Numerical examples indicate that
the non-uniform distribution of bers rearranges the stress eld, of which the in-plane stresses are sensitive to the bers distribution, while the transverse stresses are not affected so much. In-plane stresses
near interfaces would decrease if the ber ratio reduces in this region, which provides a method to
resolve the interfacial stress concentration problems.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Nowadays, composite laminates have been widely used in modern industry due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, high stiffness-to-weight ratio as well as good fatigue resistant properties.
Moreover, the designability of this kind of material makes it have
more development potential than the commonly used metals. Conventional ber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite laminates are
commonly manufactured by bonding many homogeneous single
layers which have unied ber orientation and ber volume fraction
(FVF) together. Of this kind of structures, much research has been
done on their mechanical properties like bending, buckling and
vibration or the failure behaviors such as damage, fracture and fatigue. Along with this, various laminate theories have been developed,
for example, the three-dimensional theories, smeared plate theories,
layer-wise models, zigzag models, and global-local models [1,2].
With the occurrence of functionally graded metal-ceramic materials, researchers extend this gradient idea to the design of FRP composites. And during the last two decades, functionally graded FRP
composites have been widely developedfrom the in-plane to
out-of-plane, from the gradient distribution of FVFs to ber orientations, and from the bers spatial arrangement to the change of
material properties.
Martin and Leissa [35] are pioneers to this study and they
focused on the effect of the in-plane FVF distribution on the
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 731 88822421; fax: +86 731 88822330.
E-mail address: p_zhang87@hotmail.com (P. Zhang).
0261-3069/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2009.12.027
mechanical properties of plates. Numerical solutions and some exact solutions under specied boundary conditions were obtained
for the plane elasticity problems. Buckling and vibration of the
plate were also studied by them and it was found that the rearrangement of bers can change the critical buckling loads and resonant frequencies of structures. After that, Shiau et al. [6,7] used
the nite element method (FEM) to model this plate and found that
the reduction of the in-plane FVF near free edges or holes can reduce the stress concentrations there. This kind of FRP plate was
used for the reinforcement of shear walls by Meftah et al. [8,9]
and both the lateral stiffness and vibration characteristics were
studied by using FEM. Nowadays, the gradient design of FVFs is
not limited to the in-plane direction. Through thickness functionally graded design method was introduced by Benatta et al. in
Ref. [10], of which a single layer composite beam was studied by
using the higher order beam theory and effects of different distribution functions on the bending responses were also discussed.
Oyekoya et al. [11] established a nite element model for plates
with the FVFs gradient distribution along multi-directions and
investigated the buckling and vibration problems. Kuo and Shiau
[12] discussed the effect of different through thickness distribution
functions of the FVF on the critical buckling loads and resonance
frequencies of the plate by using the FEM. The purpose of them
is to design structures with ideal buckling and vibration characteristics via the non-uniform distribution of FVFs.
Besides the gradient distribution of FVFs, other methods such as
changing the bers orientations or material properties have also
been proposed in literatures. Batra and Jin [13] found that the res-
2905
2. The model
kI
kM
Vf Vf
2jfk j=h1 p
kM
Vf Vf
onant frequency of the plate can be altered by the gradient distribution of ber orientations along the thickness direction. Han et al.
[14] pointed out that the optimum design of bers can improve the
interfacial properties of laminates and established a nite element
model. Cho and Rowlands [15] attempted to change the ber orientations near holes in a short ber reinforced plate to reduce
the stress concentration. Bouremana et al. [16] proposed a new
idea of structural design in thermal environment, of which the ber with negative thermal expansion coefcient was used to eliminate the thermal stress. Overall, the bers volume fraction,
orientation and material properties should all be considered in
the composites optimal design process, as illustrated in Fig. 1. To
achieve a comprehensive optimal design, the buckling and vibration analysis should be carried out together with the failure analysis which needs exact calculations of stress elds beforehand.
Evidently, various aspects must be considered such as the environment, reliability, industrial costs, etc.
Most of the methods used in the above mentioned literatures
are on the basis of higher-order laminate theories and the FEM.
Nevertheless, these conventional appropriate theories encounter
difculties when handling these functionally graded plates, which
are anisotropic and highly non-homogeneous; exact solutions are
quite difcult to get. Therefore, the state space method, a powerful
three dimensional solution method, is utilized in this paper. Functionally graded laminates, with different boundary and plied conditions, are discussed in the numerical examples. The results
indicate that the reduction of FVFs near interfaces can reduce the
in-plane stress concentration. Nonetheless, the transverse stresses
which have lower order than in-plane ones affect little.
R h1 =2
k
Vf
h1 =2
V f dfk
h1
kM
pV f
kI
Vf
p1
Vf
k
k
kI
V f V f V f =p
3
k
p P max
Vf
Vf
kI
Vf
Vf
!
4
V f V min V f V k
max
k
Fig. 2. Sketch of the composite laminated plate and its cross section.
2906
0
Vf =0.6
0.8
k I
c012
c022
0.6
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
@
k I
Vf =0.6
k I
Vf =0.8
0.4
-h1/2
h1/2
Fig. 3. Fiber volume fraction distributions along the thickness direction in a single
layer.
c013
c023
c033
Vf =0.4
Vf
c011
B
B
B
B
C B
B
B
@
p=5
p=10
0
c044
sym:
E1
L
0
c055
mLT E1
L
mLT E1
L
E1
T
mTT E1
T
C
C
C
C
C
0 C
C
0 A
c066
0
E1
T
G1
LT
0
G1
TT
sym:
where E, G and m are the Youngs modulus, shear modulus and Poissons ratio, respectively.
The stressstrain relation in the global coordinate system o-xyz
should be transformed as
where r, e, C are the stress, strain and stiffness matrix in the global
coordinate system, which have the form as
r frx
3. Basic equations
EL V f Ef 1 V f Em
ET
1
Em
p
V f 1 Em =Ef
GLT GTT
1
Gm
p
V f 1 Gm =Gf
c13
c16
c22
c23
c26 C
C
C
c36 C
C
0 C
C
C
0 A
c66
c44
c45
sym:
c55
r Q r0
C QC Q
8
T
r0 C0 e0
6
0
where r , e and C are the stress, strain and stiffness matrix in the
principle coordinate of materials, respectively, which can be written
as
r0 fr1
c12
c33
c11
B
B
B
B
CB
B
B
B
@
e Q e0
ET
1
2GTT
These quantities can be obtained through the coordinate transformation from Eq. (6), as
mLT V f mf 1 V f mm
mTT
C
C
C
C
C
C
0 C
C
C
0 A
G1
LT
r Ce
the closer of the gradient distribution function to the uniform one
is; a conventional distribution form would be got when p ? 1.
11
c2
s2
0 0
B s2
B
B
B0
Q B
B0
B
B
@0
c2
0 0
1 0
s
cs 0 0
cs
2cs
2cs C
C
C
0 C
C
0 C
C
C
0 A
c 2 s2
@ x rx @ y sxy @ z sxz 0
@ x sxy @ y ry @ z syz 0
@ x sxz @ y syz @ z rz 0
As innitesimal deformation theory is considered here, the straindisplacement relationship is
2907
ex @ x u; cxz @ z u @ x w
ey @ y v ; cyz @ z v @ y w
ez @ z w; cxy @ y u @ x v
10
@ z g Ag
11
g u
v rz sxz syz
T
0 A1
A
A2 0
0
a1 c55 a1 c45
B
A1 @
a1 c44
sym:
B
A2 @
>
>
sxz x; y; z >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> syz x; y; z >
>
>
>
>
>
>
;
:
wx; y; z
9
~ mn z cosmpn sinnp1 >
u
>
>
>
>
v~ mn z sinmpn cosnp1 >
>
>
>
>
r~ zmn z sinmpn sinnp1 =
>
>s
~xzmn z cosmpn sinnp1 >
n1 >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>s
~yzmn z sinmpn cosnp1 >
>
>
>
>
>
>
;
:
~ mn z sinmpn sinnp1
w
8
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
1 X
1 >
<
X
m1
14
9
8
~ xmn sinmpn sinnp1 >
=
<r
1 X
1 >
X
ry
r~ ymn sinmpn sinnp1
>
>
>
>
:
sxy ; m1 n1 : s~xymn cosmpn cosnp1 ;
9
8
>
=
< rx >
15
The mechanical load q applied on the top surface of the plate can be
set as
9
8
ux; y; z >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
v x; y; z >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
=
< rz x; y; z >
@ x
qx; y; h
1 X
1
X
16
m1 n1
C
@ y A
0
1
a2 @ xx 2a3 @ xy a4 @ yy a3 @ xx a4 a5 @ xy a6 @ yy a7 @ x a8 @ y
C
a4 @ xx 2a6 @ xy a9 @ yy
a8 @ x a10 @ y A
sym:
c1
33
After substituting Eq. (14) into the state-space Eq. (11), spatial variables x and y can be eliminated automatically. Thus for each order
of m and n, there exists
17
where
1
a1
;
c44 c55 c245
a4
c236
c66 ;
c33
c23 c36
c26 ;
c33
c23
:
c33
a6
a10
c2
a2 13 c11 ;
c33
~ mn v~ mn r
~ zmn s
~xzmn s
~yzmn w
~ mn T
gmn u
c13 c36
a3
c16 ;
c33
a5
c13 c23
c12 ;
c33
a7
c13
;
c33
a8
c36
;
c33
a9
c223
c22 ;
c33
For the other three stress components rx, ry and sxy, there exists
9
8
>
=
< rx >
>
:
ry
>
sxy ;
a2 @ x a3 @ y
B
@ a5 @ x a6 @ y
a3 @ x a5 @ y
a6 @ x a9 @ y
a3 @ x a4 @ y
a4 @ x a6 @ y
18 9
a7 >
=
<u>
C
a10 A v
>
: >
a8
rz ;
12
rx, ry, sxy can be got automatically from the solutions to Eq. (11).
Thus the solving methods are focused on in the following part.
4. Solution methodology
4.1. Classic state space method
Classic state space method can obtain excellent analytical
solution; however, both the boundary conditions and material
properties are restrictiveonly simply supported or sliding
boundary conditions as well as orthotropic material are applicable. For the laminate considered in this section which is crossply laminated and simply supported, its boundary conditions
can be written as
x 0; a : rx w v 0
y 0; b : ry w u 0
13
To satisfy these equations, the unknown state space vector is expanded with trigonometric series, as
1
0 mp
c1
44
B
C
B
C
B
0
0 c1
np C
55
B
C
B
C
B
m p np
0 C
B
C
B
C
Amn B
C
2
2
2
2
2
B c66 n p a2 m p
C
c
a
mn
p
a
m
p
66
5
7
B
C
B
C
B
C
0
B c66 a5 mnp2 c66 m2 p2 a9 n2 p2 a10 np
C
@
A
a10 np
c1
a7 mp
33
8~
0
18 ~ 9
a2 mp a5 np a7 > u
r 9
>
=
=
< xmn >
< mn >
C
r~ ymn B
@ a5 mp a9 np a10 A v~ mn
>
>
>
>
;
;
:
:
s~xymn
c66 np c66 mp
0
r~ zmn
18
h
i
j1
gmn z exp Amn z zI
gj1
mn
19
h
i
j
j1
j1
j1
gmn
gj
Tj
mn exp Amn zI zI
mn gmn
20
2908
j
Y
gj
mn
0
Ti
mn gmn
21
N
x 1
X
Pik wkj
k2
i1
For the Rth numerical interface, i.e. the top surface of the laminate,
there exists
gR
mn
R
Y
0
Ti
mn gmn
22
i1
R
N
y 1
X
Q jl wil
l2
@ z rzij
N
x 1 h
X
Pik
1
1 1
sxzkj c44 P1
i1 P 1k P iNx P Nx k wkj
k2
here gmn and gmn are the state-space vector at the top and bottom
surfaces of the plate. And the mechanical loads at these two surfaces are set as
R
~mn
~R
~0
~R
~ 0
s~0
r~ zmn
q
xzmn sxzmn syzmn syzmn rzmn 0;
23
N
y 1 h
X
Q jl
1
1 1
syzil c55 Q 1
j1 Q 1l Q jNy Q Ny l wil
l2
i
2
1 1
1 1
P ik a2 ukj a3 v kj a7 c33 P i1 P 1k P iNx P Nx k a7 ukj a8 v kj
N
x 1 h
X
@ z sxzij
k2
gmn and gmn can be determined by solving Eqs. (22) and (23); furtherly, state-space vectors at other numerical interfaces can also
~ ymn and s
~xymn can easily
~ xmn ; r
be obtained from Eq. (21). At last, r
be gained from Eq. (18) automatically. So the 3D solutions to the
static bending problem of the functionally graded laminated plate
are presented.
N
y 1 h
X
i
2
1 1
1 1
Q jl a4 uil a6 v il a8 c33 Q j1 Q 1l Q jNy Q Ny l a8 uil a10 v il
l2
N
x 1
X
P ik
N
y 1
X
l2
k2
Q jl 2a3 ukl a4 a5 v kl a7
N
y 1
X
Q jl
N
x 1
X
P ik
rzkj a8
k2
rzil
l2
It is quite difcult to give the eigenfunctions like Eq. (14) directly for general cases such as clamped or free edge boundary conditions or the laminate is angle-plied, then the classic state-space
method cannot be used. Fortunately, a semi-analytical method
named DQSSM (differential quadrature-state space method) [20]
is capable to handle these problems. The main idea of this method
is to use the DQM (differential quadrature method) to discrete x
and y variables in Eq. (11), and then solve state-space vectors at
all the discrete points as a whole. In what follows we will present
the details of this method.
The sampling points of DQM are taken as [21]
1 cosi 1p=Nx 1
a;
2
1 cosj 1p=Ny 1
yj
b;
2
xi
i 1; 2; . . . ; N x
24
xi ;yi
Nx
X
k1
P ik
Ny
X
Q jl Wkl
i
2
1 1
1 1
P ik a3 ukj a4 v kj a8 c33 P i1 P 1k P iNx P Nx k a7 ukj a8 v kj
k2
N
y 1 h
X
2
1 1
1 1
Q jl a6 uil a9 v il a10 c33 Q j1 Q 1l Q jNy Q Ny l
l2
N
x 1
X
a8 uil a10 v il
P ik
N
x 1
X
P ik
rzkj a10
N
x 1
X
Q jl
rzil
27
l2
k2
@ z wij
N
y 1
X
Q jl a4 a5 ukl 2a6 v kl
l1
k2
a8
N
y 1
X
Pik a7 ukj a8 v kj
N
y 1
X
l2
k2
bg
@ z ^g A^
j 1; 2; . . . ; N y
@ rs W
@xr @ys
N
x 1 h
X
25
l1
^g fuij
28
wij gT
N
y 1
X
where Pik is the weighting coefcient for rth order derivative res
r
spect to x, similar meaning for Q jl in y direction. Details for P ik
s
and Q jl can be found in Ref. [21], which would not be presented
here.
In this section we only consider the case that the laminate is
four-edge clamped; other boundary cases are similar to this and
would not be introduced. For a full-clamped plate, the boundary
conditions can be written as
sxzij c44
x 0; a : u v w 0
where i and j indicate the boundary points. Stresses in Eq. (29) can
be obtained from the solutions of Eq. (28).
In-plane stress components rx, ry and sxy can also be written in
the discrete form, after applying Eq. (25) to Eq. (12), which are as
follows:
y 0; b : u v w 0
26
k2
syzij c45
N
x 1
X
1
Pik wkj
c55
rzij c33
k2
Q jl wil
l2
k2
N
x 1
X
l2
N
y 1
X
Q jl wil
1
Pik a7 ukj
a8 v kj c33
N
y 1
X
Q jl a8 uil a10 v il
l2
29
2909
rxij
ryij
N
y 1
X
k2
l2
N
x 1
X
N
y 1
X
N
x 1
X
Pik a2 ukj a3 v kj
Pik a5 ukj a6 v kj
sxyij
l2
k2
N
x 1
X
^gj;0 ^gj1;Rn
Q jl a3 uil a5 v il a7 rzij
1
P ik a3 ukj
a4 v kj
N
y 1
X
a6 v il a8 rzij
b j;i ^gj;0
T
31
i1
h
i
b zj;i zj;i1
exp A
I
I
32
Obviously, for variables at the top surface of the jth sub-layer, i.e.
^
gj;Rn , there exists
^gj;Rn
Rn
Y
b j;i ^gj;0
T
35
b j;i
T
For state space vectors at the top and bottom surfaces of the lamigRs ;Rn , there are six variables known as loading
nate, i.e. ^
g1;0 and ^
conditions:
30
k
Y
34
l2
k2
^gj;k
j 2; 3; . . . ; Rs
j 1; 2; . . . ; Rs
33
i1
This is the transfer relationship between variables at the two surfaces of the jth sub-layer. If the state space vector ^
gj;0 was known,
all the variables in other numerical layers of the jth sub-layer can be
obtained from Eq. (31).
Unlike the classic state space method, joint coupling technique
reserves unknown state space vectors at interfaces between sublayers, instead of eliminating them to get a simple relationship as
Eq. (22). The interfacial continuation equation between two adjacent sub-layers is
EL 174:6 GPa;
GTT 1:4 GPa;
ET 7 GPa;
w
2
h
h
;
~11 a2
2 q
a
h
syz syz ; 0; 0 ~
2
q11 a
sxy sxy 0; 0;
r x rx
2
a b h
h
;
; ;
~11 a2
2 2 2 q
sxz sxz 0; ; 0 ~ ;
2
q11 a
2910
Table 1
Comparison of the deection and stresses responses of laminated plates [0/90/90/
0] with Ref. [22]
Source
w
r x
r y
syz
sxz
xy
s
Pagano
Present
Pagano
Present
Pagano
Present
Pagano
Present
1.954
1.9367
0.743
0.7370
0.517
0.5130
0.4385
0.4346
0.720
0.7203
0.559
0.5586
0.543
0.5428
0.539
0.5388
0.663
0.6519
0.401
0.3965
0.308
0.3052
0.276
0.2683
0.292
0.2915
0.196
0.1959
0.156
0.1556
0.141
0.1389
0.219
0.2193
0.301
0.3014
0.328
0.3282
0.337
0.3388
0.0467
0.04666
0.0275
0.02750
0.0230
0.02302
0.0216
0.02135
10
20
100
200
a/h
T300/5208
150
EL
ET
100
50
GLT=GTT
0.0
0.2
x; r
y
r
rx
2
a b
a b
h
; ; z ; ry
; ;z
~11 a2
q
2 2
2 2
0.8
1.0
Fig. 5. Effect of different ber ratios on the material properties of the FRP
composite.
rz
~11 sinpn
Case 1: Four edges simply supported and with q q
sinp1 loaded on the top surface; a = b = 4h.
Case 2: Four edges clamped and with q = q0 loaded on the top surface; a = b = 10h.
0.6
Vf
z; s
xy ; s
xz ; s
yz
r
0.4
a
h
a b
b
; ; z ; sxy 0; 0; z; sxz 0; ; z ; syz ; 0; z
~11 a
2 2
2
2
q
Case 2:
x; r
y
r
rx
2
a b
a b
h
; ; z ; ry
; ;z
2 2
2 2
q0 a2
z; s
xy ; s
xz ; s
yz
r
rz
a b
a b
a b
a b
h
; ; z ; sxy ; ; z ; sxz ; ; z ; syz ; ; z
2 2
4 4
4 2
2 4
q0 a
Table 2
Comparison of the results to full-clamped isotropic plates with literatures.
a=h
Nx Ny
2Gq1
0 h
Present (Rs = 3)
Present (Rs = 6)
L [20]
Liew [23]
Present (Rs = 3)
Present (Rs = 6)
L [20]
Liew [23]
55
77
99
11 11
13 13
10.96941
11.13728
11.13522
11.17399a
11.18524a
10.96941
11.13728
11.13522
11.17399
11.18524
10.96941
11.13728
11.13522
11.17399
11.15777
11.13736
11.13671
11.17407
11.18546
4.250688
3.870329
3.887901
3.814499a
3.880341a
4.250688
3.870329
3.887901
3.814500
3.880341
4.25069
3.87033
3.88790
3.81450
4.36199
3.86034
3.89135
3.81293
3.88135
10
55
77
99
11 11
13 13
123.8261
124.6102
123.7850
125.1241
125.0002
123.8261
124.6102
123.7850
125.1241
125.0002
123.8261
124.6102
123.7850
125.1241
124.4904
124.6105
123.7856
125.1241
125.0003
15.95727
14.95357
13.66635
14.42233
14.10789
15.95727
14.95357
13.66635
14.42233
14.10789
15.9573
14.9536
13.6664
14.4223
16.0563
14.9511
13.6667
14.4223
14.1079
1
q1
0 rx a=2; b=2; h
2911
E (GPa)
G (GPa)
Graphite T300
Epoxy 5208
231
3.9
91
1.4
0.27
0.35
and the values of them decrease a little at the center point when
kI
V f becomes larger. There are mainly three reasons that account
for this phenomenon. First, the softening of the material stiffness
may increase the strain, which generates a mount of stresses. Second, different from the longitudinal elastic modulus, the transverse
elastic modulus and the shear modulus change slowly (see Fig. 5)
with respect to the FVF so the ber ratios effect is not obvious.
Moreover, loading transfer between adjacent laminas is commonly
induced by transverse stresses, which makes this kind of design
method not easy to reduce transverse stresses near interfaces as
0.8
0.50
k I
Vf =0.3
k I
Vf =0.6
0.4
0.25
k I
0.0
Vf =0.9
-0.4
-0.8
0.0
0.00
-0.25
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.50
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
z/h
0.8
0.8
1.0
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.0
xy
0.6
z/h
0.1
-0.4
0.0
-0.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
z/h
z/h
0.3
0.20
0.15
yz
xz
0.2
0.10
0.1
0.05
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
z/h
0.8
1.0
0.00
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
z/h
Fig. 6. Interlaminar stress distribution of symmetric [0/90/90/0] simply supported laminated plates with variable ber spacing.
1.0
2912
k I
Vf =0.3
k I
Vf =0.6
0.4
k I
Vf =0.9
0.0
0.0
-0.4
-0.4
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.8
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
z/h
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.0
xy
0.6
z/h
0.1
-0.4
0.0
-0.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
1.0
z/h
z/h
0.3
0.2
0.2
yz
xz
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/h
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
1.0
z/h
Fig. 7. Interlaminar stress distribution of asymmetric [90/0/90/0] simply supported laminated plates with variable ber spacing.
2913
0.4
k I
Vf =0.3
k I
Vf =0.6
0.2
0.15
k I
0.0
Vf =0.9
-0.15
-0.2
-0.4
0.0
0.00
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.30
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/h
z/h
0.50
0.10
0.00
xy
0.25
0.05
-0.25
-0.50
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.00
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/h
z/h
0.3
0.20
0.15
yz
xz
0.2
0.10
0.1
0.05
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.00
0.0
z/h
0.2
0.4
1.0
z/h
Fig. 8. Interlaminar stress distribution of cross-ply [0/90/0/90/0] clamped laminated plates with variable ber spacing.
interfaces of the 45 or 45 layers; nevertheless, this stress concentration can still be reduced by the proposed gradient design method.
Note that classic state space can not handle the angle-plied laminates for any boundary conditions, which must be solved by DQSSM.
From another point of view, the redistribution of ber ratios
leads to the change of not only stress elds but also the strength
of composites, commonly larger FVF has stronger strength. Therefore, the strength criterion seems variational in each point, which
should be carefully treated in the design process. Accurate determination of the stress eld and strength criteria eld is necessary for
2914
0.2
k I
Vf =0.3
k I
Vf =0.6
0.2
0.1
k I
0.0
Vf =0.9
-0.2
-0.4
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
-0.2
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
z/h
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/h
0.10
0.5
xy
0.0
0.05
-0.5
-1.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.00
0.0
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/h
z/h
0.15
0.4
0.12
0.3
yz
xz
0.09
0.2
0.06
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.03
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/h
0.00
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/h
Fig. 9. Interlaminar stress distribution of angle-ply [0/45/90/45/0] clamped laminated plates with variable ber spacing.
near interfaces would decrease if the ber ratio reduces in this region, which provides a method to resolve the interfacial stress concentration problems. However, transverse stresses which have
lower order of magnitude than the in-plane ones do not change
very much.
Though the 3D methods can obtain accurate solutions, they
have to some extent lost the computational efciency, especially
when computing the transfer matrix for each single numerical
layer. In the future studies, specic laminate theories, which have
both advantages in accuracy and efciency, must be developed for
heterogeneous laminates which have general boundary and load
conditions. Whats more, the strength criterion of this kind of functionally graded material is also a problem to be resolved later on.
Acknowledgements
Support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China
through Grant No. 10872066 should be acknowledged. The authors
thank for the suggestion from Professor Chaofeng L in Zhejiang
University of China and also the valuable advice of reviewers.
References
[1] Carrera E. Theories and nite elements for multilayered, anisotropic,
composite plates and shells. Arch Comp Methods Eng 2002;9(2):87140.
[2] Chen W J, Wu Z. A selective review on recent development of displacementbased laminated plate theories. Rec Patents Mech Eng 2008;1:2944.
[3] Martin AF, Leissa AW. Application of the Ritz method to plane elasticity
problems for composite sheets with variable bre spacing. Int J Numer
Methods Eng 1989;28:181325.
[4] Leissa AW, Martin AF. Some exact plane elasticity solutions for
nonhomogeneous, orthotropic sheets. J Elast 1990;23:97112.
[5] Leissa AW, Martin AF. Vibration and buckling of rectangular composite plates
with variable ber spacing. Compos Struct 1990;14:33957.
[6] Shiau LC, Chue YH. Free-edge stress reduction through ber volume fraction
variation. Compos Struct 1991;19:14565.
[7] Shiau LC, Lee GC. Stress concentration around holes in composite laminates
with variable ber spacing. Compos Struct 1993;24:10715.
[8] Meftah SA, Yeghnem R, Tounsi A, Adda Bedia EA. Seismic behavior of RC
coupled shear walls repaired with CFRP laminates having variable bers
spacing. Construct Build Mater 2007;21:166171.
[9] Meftah SA, Yeghnem R, Tounsi A, Adda Bedia EA. Lateral stiffness and vibration
characteristics of composite plated RC shear walls with variable bres spacing.
Mater Des 2008;29:195564.
2915
[10] Benatta MA, Mechab I, Tounsi A, Adda Bedia EA. Static analysis of functionally
graded short beams including warping and shear deformation effects. Compos
Mater Sci 2008;44:76573.
[11] Oyekoya OO, Mba DU, El-Zafrany AM. Buckling and vibration analysis of
functionally graded composite structures using the nite element method.
Compos Struct 2009;89:13242.
[12] Kuo SY, Shiau LC. Buckling and vibration of composite laminated plates with
variable ber spacing. Compos Struct 2009;90:196200.
[13] Batra RC, Jin J. Natural frequencies of a functionally graded anisotropic
rectangular plate. J Sound Vib 2005;282:50916.
[14] Han SC, Lee WH, Park WT. Non-linear analysis of laminated composite and
sigmoid functionally graded anisotropic structures using a higher-order shear
deformable
natural
Lagrangian
shell
element.
Compos
Struct
2009;89:819.
[15] Cho HK, Rowlands RE. Optimizing ber direction in perforated orthotropic
media to reduce stress concentration. J Compos Mater 2009;43(10):117798.
[16] Bouremana M, Tounsi A, Kaci A, Mechab I. Controlling thermal deformation by
using composite materials having variable ber volume fraction. Mater Des
2009;30:25327.
[17] Chamis CC. Mechanics of composite materials: past, present and future. J
Compos Technol Res ASTM 1989;11:314.
[18] Khdeir AA. A remark on the state-space concept applied to bending, buckling
and free vibration of composite laminates. Compos Struct 1996;59(5):8137.
[19] Bellman R. Introduction to matrix analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Company;
1970.
[20] L CF, Chen WQ, Shao JW. Semi-analytical three-dimensional elasticity
solutions for generally laminated composite plates. Eur J Mech A Solids
2008;27:899917.
[21] Bert CW, Malik M. Differential quadrature method in computational
mechanics: a review. Appl Mech Rev 1996;49(1):128.
[22] Pagano NJ, Hateld SJ. Elastic behavior of multilayered bidirectional
composites. AIAA J 1972;10:9313.
[23] Liew KM, Teo TM. Modeling via differential quadrature method: threedimensional solutions for rectangular plates. Comput Methods Appl Mech
Eng 1998;159:36981.