Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
62
63
11. Oka
Lely.
Jika
anak
terlambat
bicara.
2008.
Available
from
www.balipost.com
12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement. Media use in children
younger than 2 years. J pediatrics 2011;128:5.
13. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Television and DVD/video
viewing in children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2007;161(5):473 479.
14. Victoria J. Rideout, Elizabeth A. Vandewater, Ellen A. Wartella. Zero to six:
electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Menlo Park,
CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. 2003.
15. Linebarger DL, Walker D. Infants and toddlers television viewing and
language outcomes. Am Behav Sci. 2005;48(5):624645.
16. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Associations between media
viewing and language development in children under age two years. J Pediatr.
2007;151(4):364 368.
17. Weerasak
Chonchaiya,
Chandhita
Pruksananond.
Television
viewing
64
23. Ansel BM, Landa RM, Stark-Selz RE. Development and disorders of speech
and language. In: Oski FA, DeAngelis CD, editors. Principles and practice of
pediatrics. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:686700.
24. Simkin Z, Conti G. Evidence of reading difficulty in subgroups of children
with specific language impairment. Child language teaching and therapy
2006;22:315-31.
25. Makum, AH. Gangguan perkembangan berbahasa. Buku ajar ilmu kesehatan
anak. Jakarta: Balai penerbit FKUI. 1991; 56-69.
26. Virginia W, Meredith G. Gangguan bicara dan bahasa. Buku ajar penyakit teli
nga, hidung, tenggorok. Jakarta : EGC. 1997 ; 397-410
27. Departemen Rehabilitasi Medik. Buku laporan pasien rawat jalan. Jakarta.
2006.
28. Wahjuni S. Pemeriksaan penyaring keterlambatan perkembangan bahasa pada
anak batita dengan Early Language Milestone Scale di kelurahan Paseban
Jakarta Pusat. Jakarta. 1998.
29. Smith C, Hill J. Language development and disorders of communication and
oral motor function. Pediatric Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus.
1999.p. 57-79.
30. Silva PA, Williams SM, McGee R. A longitudinal study of children with
developmental language delay at age three; later intelligence , reading and
behavior problems. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29;630-640.
31. Schwartz ER. Speech and language disorders. In: Schwartz MW, editor.
Pediatric primary care: a problem oriented approach. St. Louis: Mosby, 1990:
696700.
32. Coplan J. Evaluation of the child with delayed speech or language. Pediatr
Ann. 1985;14:2038.
33. Leung AK, Robson WL, Fagan J, Chopra S, Lim SH. Mental retardation.
J R Soc Health. 1995;115:319.
34. Leung AK, Robson WL. Otitis media in infants and children. Drug
Protocol. 1990;5:2935.
65
and
Auditory
Milestone
Scale-Cat/Clams).
Sari
Pediatri.
2009;11(3):189-98).
41. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja. 2005.
42. Kamila B. Mistry, Cynthia S. Minkovitz, Donna M. Strobino and Dina L.G.
Children's television exposure and behavioral and social outcomes at 5.5
years: does timing of exposure matter? Pediatrics. Vol. 120(4), 2007:762-769
p. Available from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/
43. Amy B. Jordan, James C. Hersey, Judith A. McDivitt, Carrie D. Heitzler.
Reducing childrens television-viewing time: a qualitative study of parents
and their children. Pediatrics. Vol. 118(5), 2006:e1303-e1310 p. Available
from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/
44. Rideout VJ, Hamel E. The media family: electronic media in the lives of
infants, toddlers, preschoolers, and their parents. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser
Family Foundation; 2006.
66
Am Behav Sci.
2005;48(5):608-623.
48. Anderson DR, Evans MK. Peril and potential of media for infants and
toddlers. Zero to Three. 2001;22(2):10-16.
49. Kirkorian HL, Pempek TA, Murphy LA, Schmidt ME, Anderson DR. The
impact of background television on parent-child interaction. Child Dev.
2009;80(5):1350-1359.
50. Hart B, Risley TR. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of
Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1995.
51. Masako T, Okuma K, Kyoshima K. Television viewing and reduced parental
utterance, and delayed speech development in infants and young children.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(6):618-619.
52. Schmidt ME, Pempek TA, Kirkorian HL, Lund AF, Anderson DR. The effects
of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children.
Child Dev. 2008;79(4):1137-1151.
53. Dimitri A. Christakis. The effects of infant media usage: what do we know
and what should we learn? Acta Paediatrica 2009;98: 8-16.
54. Hooper ML, Chang P. Comparison of demands of sustained attentional events
between public and private childrens television programming. Percept Mot
Skills. 1998; 86:431434.
55. Amy Nathanson. Parental mediation of media effects. In Schement, Jorge
Reina, et al, editors. Encyclopedia of communication and information. New
York: Macmillan reference USA; 2002. p. 154-175
56. M. Sopiyudin Dahlan. Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan. Edisi ke-5.
Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2011.
67
68
69
70
71
PENELITI
Hubungan
Pola
Menonton
Televisi
dengan
Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun
di Semarang
Ani Safitri
Bapak/Ibu Yth,
Saya mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro yang melakukan
penelitian dengan judul Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan
Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang. Penelitian ini telah memiliki izin
tertulis dari pihak-pihak yang berwenang. Dalam penelitian ini, saya ingin mencari
informasi mengenai pola menonton televisi dan keterlambatan bicara pada anak usia 1-3
tahun. Saya akan menjelaskan tujuan, tata cara penelitian, dan menanyakan kesediaan
untuk berpartisipasi kepada orang tua responden sebagai wakil dari responden. Jika orang
tua responden bersedia, orang tua responden akan menjalani wawancara dan responden
akan menjalani pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara. Tidak terdapat risiko negatif pada
penelitian ini. Orang tua responden hanya diminta meluangkan waktu untuk melakukan
wawancara dan memberi izin saya untuk melakukan pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara
pada responden. Dengan berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini, orang tua responden dapat
mengetahui lebih dini apakah responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara
sehingga dapat ditindaklanjuti dengan cepat dan tepat. Seluruh informasi yang didapatkan
selama penelitan termasuk data pribadi dan data penelitian akan dijaga kerahasiaannya.
Nama responden atau dokumen lain yang mengidentifikasikan responden sebagai subjek
penelitian tidak akan dibuka tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari orang tua responden. Apabila
ditengah perjalanan orang tua responden mengundurkan diri dari penelitian, saya sangat
menghargai keputusan tersebut dan tidak akan mengenakan sanksi apapun. Jika
responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara, akan dirujuk ke Klinik Tumbuh
Kembang Anak RSUP Dr. Kariadi dengan dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) sebagai
penanggung jawab.
Jika Bapak/Ibu mempunyai pertanyaan mengenai penelitian ini, dapat menghubungi:
Ani Safitri (085641196888)
dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) (pembimbing)
dr. Gana Adyaksa, MSi.Med ( pembimbing)
FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS DIPENOGORO SEMARANG
Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH. Tembalang ,Semarang, Kotak Pos 1269
No Telpon
: 024-76928011
Faksimile
: 024-76928011
Email
: dean_fmdu@undip.ac.id
72
Peneliti
(Ani Safitri)
(........................................)
Mengetahui saksi-saksi
1. _______________________
2. _______________________
73
NA
25
Lakilaki
FF
19
Perem
puan
FT
30
Perem
puan
AF
33
Lakilaki
AK
23
Lakilaki
LS
32
Perem
puan
SA
30
Perem
puan
DA
32
Lakilaki
MA
29
Perem
puan
10
ZP
29
11
SH
34
Lakilaki
Lakilaki
74
hari
Perem Perguruan Perguruan
puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
12 CQ
34
13 AD
34
14
NI
19
15
FA
25
16
KB
34
17 MQ
23
18 MN
34
Lakilaki
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja
19 HA
31
Lakilaki
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja
20
TA
23
Lakilaki
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja
21
BB
23
22 MA
33
23
27
AC
Lakilaki
Lakilaki
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja
Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi
Lakilaki
SMA
SMA
Bekerja
SMA
Bekerja
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
SMA
Orang
Lain
SMA
keduanya
Bicara
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
1 buah
75
AA
25
Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi
25 KM
34
Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
SMA
1 buah
Tidak
Ada
26
21
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
SD
>
1buah
Ada
Ada
24
ER
Orang
Lain
SMA
SMA
>
1buah
Ada
Perguruan
Tinggi
SMA
Orang
Lain
Perguruan
Tinggi 1 buah
27
Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi
SMA
Bekerja Bekerja
Orang
Lain
Perguruan
Tidak
Tinggi 1 buah Ada
29 AKA
24
30 MKM
36
31 AMI
30
32 KTA
32
Lakilaki
33 CRY
31
Lakilaki
34 KZP
25
35 ASD
32
36 KAT
23
27 MAH
31
28 ARJ
Lakilaki
SMA
Tidak
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Lakilaki
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
1 buah
Tidak
Ada
Perguruan
Tinggi 1 buah
Ada
SMA
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
Tinggi
Saudara
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
Perguruan
Tidak
Tinggi 1 buah Ada
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
Perguruan
Tidak >2 jam per
Tinggi 1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
Tinggi
Saudara
SMP
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
SMA
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
Tinggi
Orang
Lain
SMA
1 buah
Tinggi
Orang
SMA
Lakilaki
1 buah
Suspek
Tidak
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Didampingi
Normal
Didampingi
Normal
Didampingi
Normal
Didampingi
Normal
Didampingi
Normal
Didampingi
Normal
Didampingi
Normal
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Didampingi
Normal
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Didampingi
Normal
76
puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Lain
Ada
37 KSP
21
SD
>
1buah
Ada
38 MPA
35
Orang
Lain
SMP
>
1buah
Ada
39 MPRN
15
Lakilaki
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja
Orang
Lain
SMP
>
1buah
Ada
40 FJV
27
Lakilaki
Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang
Lain
SMA
>
1buah
Ada
41 ART
19
42 ARL
32
Perem
puan
SMA
Perguruan
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang
Lain
SMA
43 BGA
29
Lakilaki
SMA
Perguruan
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah
Orang
Lain
SMA
Tinggi
Saudara
Tinggi
Tinggi
SD
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Didampingi
Normal
Didampingi
Normal
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Edukasi Didampingi
hiburan
dan
keduanya Didampingi
hiburan
dan
keduanya Didampingi
Normal
Normal
Normal
77
Mean
27.00
23.20
5% Trimmed Mean
27.11
Median
28.50
Variance
28.222
Std. Deviation
1-2 Jam
1.680
30.80
5.312
Minimum
19
Maximum
33
Range
14
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-.506
.687
Kurtosis
-1.195
1.334
Mean
28.75
1.222
26.19
5% Trimmed Mean
29.11
Median
29.50
Variance
29.882
Std. Deviation
31.31
5.466
Minimum
15
Maximum
36
Range
21
Interquartile Range
>2 Jam
Skewness
-.872
.512
Kurtosis
.440
.992
Mean
27.69
1.491
24.44
5% Trimmed Mean
27.82
Median
27.00
Variance
28.897
Std. Deviation
Minimum
30.94
5.376
19
78
Maximum
34
Range
15
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-.161
.616
Kurtosis
-1.558
1.191
Tests of Normality
Durasi
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Menonton
Televisi
Statistic
df
Sig.
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
Sig.
.896
10
.198
.214
10
1-2 Jam
.168
20
.140
.931
20
.161
13
.898
13
.124
>2 Jam
.192
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
.200
df
.200
Oneway
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Usia dalam Bulan
Levene Statistic
df1
.095
df2
2
Sig.
40
.910
ANOVA
Usia dalam Bulan
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
df
22.458
1168.519
1190.977
Mean Square
2
40
42
11.229
29.213
Sig.
.384
.683
25.98
5% Trimmed Mean
28.18
Median
29.50
Variance
30.289
Std. Deviation
29.95
5.504
Minimum
15
Maximum
36
Range
21
.973
79
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-.391
.414
Kurtosis
-.817
.809
28.18
1.512
24.81
5% Trimmed Mean
28.37
Median
29.00
Variance
25.164
31.55
Std. Deviation
5.016
Minimum
19
Maximum
34
Range
15
Interquartile Range
Skewness
Kurtosis
-1.159
.661
.442
1.279
Tests of Normality
Onset
Menonton
Televisi
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
.144
32
.090
.931
32
.041
>24 Bulan
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
.225
11
.125
.842
11
.033
Descriptives
Onset Menonton Televisi
trans_usia
0-24 Bulan
Statistic
Mean
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean
1.4377
Lower Bound
1.4045
Upper Bound
1.4709
5% Trimmed Mean
1.4438
Median
1.4698
Variance
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
.01629
.008
.09213
Minimum
1.18
Maximum
1.56
Range
.38
Interquartile Range
.16
Skewness
-.806
.414
Kurtosis
.350
.809
80
>24 Bulan
Mean
1.4427
Lower Bound
1.3844
Upper Bound
1.5009
5% Trimmed Mean
1.4469
Median
1.4624
Variance
.02615
.008
Std. Deviation
.08672
Minimum
1.28
Maximum
1.53
Range
.25
Interquartile Range
.07
Skewness
-1.383
.661
.853
1.279
Kurtosis
Tests of Normality
Onset
Menonton
Televisi
trans_usia
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
0-24 Bulan
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
.166
32
.026
.910
32
.011
>24 Bulan
.266
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
11
.028
.791
11
.007
Mann-Whitney Test
Test Statisticsb
Usia dalam
Bulan
Mann-Whitney U
172.500
Wilcoxon W
238.500
Z
-.098
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.922
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
.924a
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Grouping Variable: Onset Menonton Televisi
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Descriptives
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Usia dalam Bulan Edukasi
Mean
28.60
19.79
5% Trimmed Mean
28.83
Median
33.00
37.41
3.172
81
Variance
Std. Deviation
Hiburan
50.300
7.092
Minimum
19
Maximum
34
Range
15
Interquartile Range
13
Skewness
-.771
.913
Kurtosis
-2.293
2.000
Mean
27.64
1.146
25.25
5% Trimmed Mean
27.91
Median
29.50
Variance
28.909
Std. Deviation
30.02
5.377
Minimum
15
Maximum
35
Range
20
Interquartile Range
Skewness
-.736
.491
Kurtosis
-.230
.953
28.38
1.251
Keduanya Mean
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound
for Mean
Upper Bound
25.71
5% Trimmed Mean
28.47
Median
29.00
Variance
25.050
Std. Deviation
31.04
5.005
Minimum
19
Maximum
36
Range
17
Interquartile Range
10
Skewness
-.195
.564
Kurtosis
-.993
1.091
82
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Program
Televisi
yang
ditonton
Statistic
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
.333
.074
.792
.070
Hiburan
.170
22
.098
.932
22
.133
16
.952
16
.523
Keduanya
.125
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
.200
Oneway
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Usia dalam Bulan
Levene Statistic
df1
1.002
df2
2
Sig.
40
.376
ANOVA
Usia dalam Bulan
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
df
6.936
1184.041
1190.977
Mean Square
2
40
42
3.468
29.601
Sig.
.117
.890
Tidak
Didampingi
Mean
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
27.17
Lower Bound
21.00
Upper Bound
33.34
5% Trimmed Mean
27.24
Median
27.00
Variance
34.567
Std. Deviation
Didampingi
2.400
5.879
Minimum
19
Maximum
34
Range
15
Interquartile Range
11
Skewness
-.153
.845
Kurtosis
-1.492
1.741
28.16
.872
Mean
95% Confidence
Lower Bound
26.39
83
Upper Bound
29.93
5% Trimmed Mean
28.38
Median
30.00
Variance
28.140
Std. Deviation
5.305
Minimum
15
Maximum
36
Range
21
Interquartile Range
Skewness
-.589
.388
Kurtosis
-.513
.759
Tests of Normality
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Usia dalam
Bulan
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic
Tidak
Didampingi
.173
Didampingi
.149
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
df
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
6
37
Statistic
df
Sig.
.949
.729
.037
.939
37
.043
.200
Descriptives
Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
trans_usia
Tidak
Didampingi
Mean
1.4251
1.3227
5% Trimmed Mean
1.4274
Median
1.4302
Variance
Std. Deviation
Didampingi
1.5275
.010
.09758
Minimum
1.28
Maximum
1.53
Range
.25
Interquartile Range
.18
Skewness
-.434
.845
Kurtosis
-.986
1.741
Mean
1.4412
.01474
1.4113
1.4711
84
5% Trimmed Mean
1.4473
Median
1.4771
Variance
.008
Std. Deviation
.08969
Minimum
1.18
Maximum
1.56
Range
.38
Interquartile Range
.13
Skewness
-.996
.388
Kurtosis
.630
.759
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
trans_usia
Statistic
Tidak Didampingi
df
.164
Didampingi
.169
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
Shapiro-Wilk
Sig.
6
37
Statistic
df
Sig.
.946
.707
.009
.906
37
.004
.200
Mann-Whitney Test
Test Statisticsb
Usia dalam
Bulan
Mann-Whitney U
99.500
Wilcoxon W
120.500
Z
-.405
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.686
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
.694a
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Grouping Variable: Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
Jenis Kelamin * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Perempuan
Count
1-2 Jam
>2 Jam
Total
20
4.7
9.3
6.0
20.0
40.0%
40.0%
61.5%
46.5%
9.3%
18.6%
18.6%
46.5%
12
23
85
Expected Count
Total
5.3
10.7
7.0
23.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
60.0%
60.0%
38.5%
53.5%
% of Total
14.0%
27.9%
11.6%
53.5%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
1.691a
2
.429
Likelihood Ratio
1.697
2
.428
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.169
1
.280
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 4.65.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.183
Positive
.183
Negative
.000
.597
.868
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin
Jenis Kelamin * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Laki-laki
Count
Total
17
20
14.9
5.1
20.0
53.1%
27.3%
46.5%
% of Total
39.5%
7.0%
46.5%
15
23
17.1
5.9
23.0
Expected Count
Perempuan
>24 Bulan
Count
Expected Count
86
Total
46.9%
72.7%
53.5%
% of Total
34.9%
18.6%
53.5%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
2.199a
1.283
2.274
1
1
1
.138
.257
.132
.175
2.148
.128
.143
43
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.12.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Jenis Kelamin * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Perempuan Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Hiburan Keduanya
Total
20
2.3
10.2
7.4
20.0
40.0%
40.9%
56.3%
46.5%
4.7%
20.9%
20.9%
46.5%
13
23
2.7
11.8
8.6
23.0
60.0%
59.1%
43.8%
53.5%
7.0%
30.2%
16.3%
53.5%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
87
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Df
Pearson Chi-Square
.973a
2
.615
Likelihood Ratio
.974
2
.615
Linear-by-Linear Association
.766
1
.381
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.146
Positive
.146
Negative
.000
.476
.977
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin
Jenis Kelamin * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Perempuan
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Didampingi
Total
18
20
2.8
17.2
20.0
33.3%
48.6%
46.5%
4.7%
41.9%
46.5%
19
23
3.2
19.8
23.0
66.7%
51.4%
53.5%
9.3%
44.2%
53.5%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
88
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.487a
1
.485
b
Continuity Correction
.066
1
.798
Likelihood Ratio
.497
1
.481
Fisher's Exact Test
.669
Linear-by-Linear
.475
1
.490
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.403
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
1-2 Jam
>2 Jam
Total
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Gizi Baik
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
>24 Bulan
Total
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
89
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count
% of Total
Total
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
Expected Count
% of Total
Total
22
Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
Keduanya
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
Hiburan
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Didampingi
Total
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
Total
1.4
2.8
1.8
6.0
40.0%
10.0%
.0%
14.0%
9.3%
4.7%
.0%
14.0%
18
13
37
8.6
17.2
11.2
37.0
90
Total
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
60.0%
90.0% 100.0%
86.0%
% of Total
14.0%
41.9%
30.2%
86.0%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
46.5%
30.2% 100.0%
SMA
Count
4.5
1.5
6.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
15.6%
9.1%
14.0%
% of Total
11.6%
2.3%
14.0%
27
10
37
27.5
9.5
37.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
84.4%
90.9%
86.0%
% of Total
62.8%
23.3%
86.0%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
Expected Count
Perguruan
Tinggi
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
74.4%
25.6% 100.0%
% of Total
Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Count
Expected Count
.7
3.1
2.2
6.0
20.0%
18.2%
6.3%
14.0%
2.3%
9.3%
2.3%
14.0%
18
15
37
4.3
18.9
13.8
37.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
91
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
80.0%
81.8%
93.8%
86.0%
9.3%
41.9%
34.9%
86.0%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0% 100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
100.0% 100.0%
37.2% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
.8
5.2
6.0
33.3%
10.8%
14.0%
4.7%
9.3%
14.0%
33
37
5.2
31.8
37.0
66.7%
89.2%
86.0%
9.3%
76.7%
86.0%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
14.0%
86.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
Total
10
2.3
4.7
3.0
10.0
60.0%
15.0%
7.7%
23.3%
92
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
14.0%
7.0%
2.3%
23.3%
17
12
33
7.7
15.3
10.0
33.0
40.0%
85.0%
92.3%
76.7%
9.3%
39.5%
27.9%
76.7%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
46.5%
30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
10.093a
2
.006
Likelihood Ratio
9.222
2
.010
Linear-by-Linear Association
7.795
1
.005
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.479
Positive
.000
Negative
-.479
1.326
.059
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu
Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ibu
SMA
Count
Total
10
7.4
2.6
10.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
21.9%
27.3%
23.3%
% of Total
16.3%
7.0%
23.3%
Expected Count
93
Perguruan
Tinggi
Total
Count
25
33
24.6
8.4
33.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
78.1%
72.7%
76.7%
% of Total
58.1%
18.6%
76.7%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.134a
1
.715
b
Continuity Correction
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.130
1
.718
Fisher's Exact Test
.698
Linear-by-Linear
.131
1
.718
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.504
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
Total
10
1.2
5.1
3.7
10.0
20.0%
31.8%
12.5%
23.3%
2.3%
16.3%
4.7%
23.3%
15
14
33
3.8
16.9
12.3
33.0
80.0%
68.2%
87.5%
76.7%
9.3%
34.9%
32.6%
76.7%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
94
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
100.0% 100.0%
% of Total
11.6%
51.2%
100.0% 100.0%
37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
1.971a
2
.373
Likelihood Ratio
2.060
2
.357
Linear-by-Linear Association
.731
1
.393
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.16.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.224
Positive
.021
Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu
-.224
.621
.835
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
10
1.4
8.6
10.0
50.0%
18.9%
23.3%
7.0%
16.3%
23.3%
30
33
4.6
28.4
33.0
50.0%
81.1%
76.7%
7.0%
69.8%
76.7%
95
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
14.0%
86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
2.794a
1
.095
b
Continuity Correction
1.324
1
.250
Likelihood Ratio
2.431
1
.119
Fisher's Exact Test
.127
Linear-by-Linear
2.729
1
.099
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.127
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
1-2 Jam
>2 Jam
Total
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Bekerja
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
>24 Bulan
Total
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96
% of Total
Total
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
% of Total
Total
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
Expected Count
% of Total
Total
22
Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
Keduanya
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
Hiburan
Count
% of Total
Total
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Didampingi
1-2 Jam
>2 Jam
Total
97
.9
1.9
1.2
4.0
20.0%
5.0%
7.7%
9.3%
4.7%
2.3%
2.3%
9.3%
19
12
39
9.1
18.1
11.8
39.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
80.0%
95.0%
92.3%
90.7%
% of Total
18.6%
44.2%
27.9%
90.7%
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Bekerja
Count
Expected Count
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
1.835a
2
.399
Likelihood Ratio
1.615
2
.446
Linear-by-Linear Association
.831
1
.362
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .93.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.295
Positive
.000
Negative
-.295
.562
.911
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu
Pekerjaan IBu * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
>24 Bulan
Total
3.0
1.0
4.0
98
Bekerja
9.4%
9.1%
9.3%
% of Total
7.0%
2.3%
9.3%
29
10
39
29.0
10.0
39.0
90.6%
90.9%
90.7%
% of Total
67.4%
23.3%
90.7%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.001a
1
.978
b
Continuity Correction
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.001
1
.978
Fisher's Exact Test
1.000
Linear-by-Linear
.001
1
.978
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.733
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
Hiburan Keduanya
Total
.5
2.0
1.5
4.0
20.0%
4.5%
12.5%
9.3%
2.3%
2.3%
4.7%
9.3%
21
14
39
4.5
20.0
14.5
39.0
80.0%
95.5%
87.5%
90.7%
9.3%
48.8%
32.6%
90.7%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
99
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
1.462a
1.418
.000
43
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
df
2
2
1
.481
.492
.985
a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .47.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.147
Positive
.141
Negative
-.147
.281
1.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu
Pekerjaan IBu * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
Didampingi
Total
.6
3.4
4.0
50.0%
2.7%
9.3%
7.0%
2.3%
9.3%
36
39
5.4
33.6
39.0
50.0%
97.3%
90.7%
7.0%
83.7%
90.7%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
13.689a
1
.000
b
Continuity Correction
8.657
1
.003
Likelihood Ratio
9.103
1
.003
Fisher's Exact Test
.006
Linear-by-Linear
13.371
1
.000
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.006
12
2.8
5.6
3.6
12.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0%
20.0%
23.1%
27.9%
% of Total
11.6%
9.3%
7.0%
27.9%
16
10
31
7.2
14.4
9.4
31.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0%
80.0%
76.9%
72.1%
% of Total
11.6%
37.2%
23.3%
72.1%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
Total
Count
Total
>2 Jam
Expected Count
Tinggi
1-2 Jam
3.198a
2.994
1.715
df
2
2
1
.202
.224
.190
101
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.79.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.255
Positive
.000
Negative
-.255
.751
.625
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi
Status Ekonomi * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Menengah
Count
12
8.9
3.1
12.0
21.9%
45.5%
27.9%
% of Total
16.3%
11.6%
27.9%
25
31
23.1
7.9
31.0
78.1%
54.5%
72.1%
% of Total
58.1%
14.0%
72.1%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
Expected Count
Tinggi
>24 Bulan
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
2.262a
1.242
2.139
1
1
1
.133
.265
.144
2.210
.137
.241
.133
102
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Status Ekonomi * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Hiburan Keduanya
12
1.4
6.1
4.5
12.0
40.0%
36.4%
12.5%
27.9%
4.7%
18.6%
4.7%
27.9%
14
14
31
3.6
15.9
11.5
31.0
60.0%
63.6%
87.5%
72.1%
7.0%
32.6%
32.6%
72.1%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
3.033a
2
.219
Likelihood Ratio
3.290
2
.193
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.516
1
.113
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.40.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Total
Absolute
.285
Positive
.000
Negative
-.285
.838
.484
103
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.285
Positive
.000
Negative
-.285
.838
.484
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi
Status Ekonomi * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
12
1.7
10.3
12.0
66.7%
21.6%
27.9%
9.3%
18.6%
27.9%
29
31
4.3
26.7
31.0
33.3%
78.4%
72.1%
4.7%
67.4%
72.1%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
% of Total
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Didampingi
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
5.207a
3.209
4.646
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
1
1
1
.022
.073
.031
.042
5.086
.024
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
.042
104
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
5.207a
1
.022
b
Continuity Correction
3.209
1
.073
Likelihood Ratio
4.646
1
.031
Fisher's Exact Test
.042
Linear-by-Linear
5.086
1
.024
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.042
Count
>2 Jam
Total
10
2.3
4.7
3.0
10.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0%
10.0%
23.1%
23.3%
% of Total
11.6%
4.7%
7.0%
23.3%
18
10
33
7.7
15.3
10.0
33.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0%
90.0%
76.9%
76.7%
% of Total
11.6%
41.9%
23.3%
76.7%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Expected Count
Total
1-2 Jam
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
5.977a
2
.050
Likelihood Ratio
5.730
2
.057
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.748
1
.186
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
105
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.348
Positive
.000
Negative
-.348
.965
.309
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak
Pengasuh Anak * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Saudara
Count
10
7.4
2.6
10.0
25.0%
18.2%
23.3%
% of Total
18.6%
4.7%
23.3%
24
33
24.6
8.4
33.0
75.0%
81.8%
76.7%
% of Total
55.8%
20.9%
76.7%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
Expected Count
Orang Lain
>24 Bulan
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.213a
1
.644
b
Continuity Correction
.002
1
.962
Likelihood Ratio
.221
1
.638
Fisher's Exact Test
1.000
Linear-by-Linear
.208
1
.648
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.496
106
Count
10
1.2
5.1
3.7
10.0
40.0%
18.2%
25.0%
23.3%
4.7%
9.3%
9.3%
23.3%
18
12
33
3.8
16.9
12.3
33.0
60.0%
81.8%
75.0%
76.7%
7.0%
41.9%
27.9%
76.7%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
% of Total
Orang Lain Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
1.130a
2
.568
Likelihood Ratio
1.055
2
.590
Linear-by-Linear Association
.094
1
.759
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.16.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences
Total
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
Hiburan Keduanya
Absolute
.109
Positive
.036
Negative
-.109
.302
1.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak
Pengasuh Anak * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
107
Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Pengasuh Anak Saudara
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
10
1.4
8.6
10.0
33.3%
21.6%
23.3%
4.7%
18.6%
23.3%
29
33
4.6
28.4
33.0
66.7%
78.4%
76.7%
9.3%
67.4%
76.7%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Didampingi
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.397a
1
.529
b
Continuity Correction
.012
1
.913
Likelihood Ratio
.370
1
.543
Fisher's Exact Test
.611
Linear-by-Linear
.388
1
.534
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.429
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Total
1.9
3.7
2.4
8.0
40.0%
15.0%
7.7%
18.6%
9.3%
7.0%
2.3%
18.6%
108
SMP
SMA
Count
Expected Count
.9
1.9
1.2
4.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
.0%
10.0%
15.4%
9.3%
% of Total
.0%
4.7%
4.7%
9.3%
12
24
5.6
11.2
7.3
24.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
50.0%
60.0%
53.8%
55.8%
% of Total
11.6%
27.9%
16.3%
55.8%
1.6
3.3
2.1
7.0
10.0%
15.0%
23.1%
16.3%
2.3%
7.0%
7.0%
16.3%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
Count
Expected Count
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
23.3%
46.5%
30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
5.654a
6
.463
Likelihood Ratio
6.128
6
.409
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.250
1
.134
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .93.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
Total
12
2.8
5.6
3.6
12.0
40.0%
25.0%
23.1%
27.9%
9.3%
11.6%
7.0%
27.9%
15
10
31
7.2
14.4
9.4
31.0
109
Total
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
60.0%
75.0%
76.9%
72.1%
% of Total
14.0%
34.9%
23.3%
72.1%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
46.5%
30.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
.962a
2
.618
Likelihood Ratio
.919
2
.632
Linear-by-Linear Association
.719
1
.396
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.79.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.140
Positive
.000
Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh
-.140
.411
.996
SD
Count
6.0
2.0
8.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
18.8%
18.2%
18.6%
% of Total
14.0%
4.7%
18.6%
3.0
1.0
4.0
12.5%
.0%
9.3%
Expected Count
SMP
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
110
% of Total
SMA
9.3%
.0%
9.3%
18
24
17.9
6.1
24.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
56.3%
54.5%
55.8%
% of Total
41.9%
14.0%
55.8%
5.2
1.8
7.0
12.5%
27.3%
16.3%
9.3%
7.0%
16.3%
32
11
43
11.0
43.0
Count
Expected Count
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
32.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
74.4%
25.6% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
2.478a
3
.479
Likelihood Ratio
3.352
3
.340
Linear-by-Linear Association
.710
1
.399
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.02.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24
Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh
SD-SMP
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
>24 Bulan
Total
Count
10
12
Expected Count
8.9
3.1
12.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
31.3%
18.2%
27.9%
% of Total
23.3%
4.7%
27.9%
22
31
23.1
7.9
31.0
68.8%
81.8%
72.1%
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
111
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
51.2%
20.9%
72.1%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
74.4%
25.6% 100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.695a
1
.405
Continuity Correctionb
.197
1
.657
Likelihood Ratio
.738
1
.390
Fisher's Exact Test
.698
Linear-by-Linear
.679
1
.410
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.339
Count
Expected Count
.9
4.1
3.0
8.0
40.0%
22.7%
6.3%
18.6%
4.7%
11.6%
2.3%
18.6%
Count
Expected Count
.5
2.0
1.5
4.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
.0%
13.6%
6.3%
9.3%
% of Total
.0%
7.0%
2.3%
9.3%
10
11
24
2.8
12.3
8.9
24.0
60.0%
45.5%
68.8%
55.8%
7.0%
23.3%
25.6%
55.8%
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
SMP
SMA
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Perguruan
Total
Count
112
Tinggi
Expected Count
Total
.8
3.6
2.6
7.0
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
.0%
18.2%
18.8%
16.3%
% of Total
.0%
9.3%
7.0%
16.3%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
100.0% 100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
100.0% 100.0%
37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
df
5.655a
7.027
3.172
43
6
6
1
.463
.318
.075
a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .47.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
12
1.4
6.1
4.5
12.0
40.0% 36.4%
12.5% 27.9%
4.7% 18.6%
4.7% 27.9%
14
14
31
3.6
15.9
11.5
31.0
60.0% 63.6%
87.5% 72.1%
7.0% 32.6%
32.6% 72.1%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0% 100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
113
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
12
1.4
6.1
4.5
12.0
40.0% 36.4%
12.5% 27.9%
4.7% 18.6%
4.7% 27.9%
14
14
31
3.6
15.9
11.5
31.0
60.0% 63.6%
87.5% 72.1%
7.0% 32.6%
32.6% 72.1%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0% 100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
11.6% 51.2%
37.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
3.033a
2
.219
Likelihood Ratio
3.290
2
.193
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.516
1
.113
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.40.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.078
Positive
.078
Negative
.000
.229
1.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh
114
SD
Count
1.1
6.9
8.0
16.7%
18.9%
18.6%
2.3%
16.3%
18.6%
Count
Expected Count
.6
3.4
4.0
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
.0%
10.8%
9.3%
% of Total
.0%
9.3%
9.3%
20
24
3.3
20.7
24.0
66.7%
54.1%
55.8%
9.3%
46.5%
55.8%
1.0
6.0
7.0
16.7%
16.2%
16.3%
2.3%
14.0%
16.3%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
SMP
SMA
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
14.0%
86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
Total
.811a
1.357
.138
df
3
3
1
.847
.716
.710
115
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .56.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstabulation
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh
Count
11
12
1.7
10.3
12.0
16.7%
29.7%
27.9%
2.3%
25.6%
27.9%
26
31
4.3
26.7
31.0
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
83.3%
70.3%
72.1%
% of Total
11.6%
60.5%
72.1%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
% of Total
SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
% of Total
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
14.0%
86.0% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.438a
1
.508
b
Continuity Correction
.029
1
.864
Likelihood Ratio
.478
1
.489
Fisher's Exact Test
.659
Linear-by-Linear
.428
1
.513
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.455
116
10
Expected Count
.5
.9
.6
2.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
.0%
10.0%
.0%
4.7%
% of Total
.0%
4.7%
.0%
4.7%
20
4.7
9.3
6.0
20.0
40.0%
45.0%
53.8%
46.5%
9.3%
20.9%
16.3%
46.5%
15
3.5
7.0
4.5
15.0
40.0%
35.0%
30.8%
34.9%
9.3%
16.3%
9.3%
34.9%
Count
Expected Count
.9
1.9
1.2
4.0
10.0%
5.0%
15.4%
9.3%
2.3%
2.3%
4.7%
9.3%
Count
Expected Count
.2
.5
.3
1.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
.0%
5.0%
.0%
2.3%
% of Total
.0%
2.3%
.0%
2.3%
Count
Expected Count
.2
.5
.3
1.0
10.0%
.0%
.0%
2.3%
2.3%
.0%
.0%
2.3%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
6
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Total
Total
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
>2 Jam
Count
Expected Count
1-2 Jam
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
117
10
Count
1.5
.5
2.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
6.3%
.0%
4.7%
% of Total
4.7%
.0%
4.7%
16
20
14.9
5.1
20.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
50.0%
36.4%
46.5%
% of Total
37.2%
9.3%
46.5%
11
15
11.2
3.8
15.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
34.4%
36.4%
34.9%
% of Total
25.6%
9.3%
34.9%
3.0
1.0
4.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
9.4%
9.1%
9.3%
% of Total
7.0%
2.3%
9.3%
Count
Expected Count
.7
.3
1.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
.0%
9.1%
2.3%
% of Total
.0%
2.3%
2.3%
Count
Expected Count
.7
.3
1.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
.0%
9.1%
2.3%
% of Total
.0%
2.3%
2.3%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
118
10
Count
Expected Count
.2
1.0
.7
2.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0%
9.1%
.0%
4.7%
% of Total
.0%
4.7%
.0%
4.7%
11
20
2.3
10.2
7.4
20.0
40.0%
50.0%
43.8%
46.5%
4.7%
25.6%
16.3%
46.5%
15
1.7
7.7
5.6
15.0
40.0%
31.8%
37.5%
34.9%
4.7%
16.3%
14.0%
34.9%
Count
Expected Count
.5
2.0
1.5
4.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0%
9.1%
12.5%
9.3%
% of Total
.0%
4.7%
4.7%
9.3%
Count
Expected Count
.1
.5
.4
1.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0%
.0%
6.3%
2.3%
% of Total
.0%
.0%
2.3%
2.3%
Count
Expected Count
.1
.5
.4
1.0
20.0%
.0%
.0%
2.3%
2.3%
.0%
.0%
2.3%
22
16
43
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
37.2%
100.0%
119
10
Expected Count
.3
1.7
2.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
.0%
5.4%
4.7%
% of Total
.0%
4.7%
4.7%
18
20
2.8
17.2
20.0
33.3%
48.6%
46.5%
4.7%
41.9%
46.5%
12
15
2.1
12.9
15.0
50.0%
32.4%
34.9%
7.0%
27.9%
34.9%
Count
Expected Count
.6
3.4
4.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
.0%
10.8%
9.3%
% of Total
.0%
9.3%
9.3%
Count
Expected Count
.1
.9
1.0
16.7%
.0%
2.3%
2.3%
.0%
2.3%
Count
Expected Count
.1
.9
1.0
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
.0%
2.7%
2.3%
% of Total
.0%
2.3%
2.3%
Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
7
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
Didampingi
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
120
1 buah
Count
Total
14
30
7.0
14.0
9.1
30.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
90.0%
70.0%
53.8%
69.8%
% of Total
20.9%
32.6%
16.3%
69.8%
13
3.0
6.0
3.9
13.0
10.0%
30.0%
46.2%
30.2%
2.3%
14.0%
14.0%
30.2%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0% 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30.2%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Pearson Chi-Square
3.504a
2
.173
Likelihood Ratio
3.822
2
.148
Linear-by-Linear Association
3.404
1
.065
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 3.02.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
>2 Jam
Expected Count
Total
1-2 Jam
Absolute
.228
Positive
.228
Negative
.000
.687
.732
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah
121
1 buah
Count
21
30
22.3
7.7
30.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
65.6%
81.8%
69.8%
% of Total
48.8%
20.9%
69.8%
11
13
9.7
3.3
13.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
34.4%
18.2%
30.2%
% of Total
25.6%
4.7%
30.2%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Expected Count
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
1.018a
1
.313
b
Continuity Correction
.395
1
.530
Likelihood Ratio
1.088
1
.297
Fisher's Exact Test
.456
Linear-by-Linear
.994
1
.319
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.271
1 buah
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
Total
15
10
30
3.5
15.3
11.2
30.0
100.0%
68.2%
62.5%
69.8%
122
% of Total
11.6%
34.9%
23.3%
69.8%
13
1.5
6.7
4.8
13.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0%
31.8%
37.5%
30.2%
% of Total
.0%
16.3%
14.0%
30.2%
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
100.0% 100.0%
11.6%
51.2%
100.0% 100.0%
37.2% 100.0%
Absolute
.167
Positive
.167
Negative
.000
.502
.963
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah
Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab
1 buah
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
Didampingi
Total
27
30
4.2
25.8
30.0
50.0%
73.0%
69.8%
7.0%
62.8%
69.8%
10
13
1.8
11.2
13.0
50.0%
27.0%
30.2%
7.0%
23.3%
30.2%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
123
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
1.292a
1
.256
Continuity Correctionb
.432
1
.511
Likelihood Ratio
1.204
1
.273
Fisher's Exact Test
.345
Linear-by-Linear
1.262
1
.261
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.248
Tidak
Ada
Count
27
6.3
12.6
8.2
27.0
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
70.0%
55.0%
69.2%
62.8%
% of Total
16.3%
25.6%
20.9%
62.8%
16
3.7
7.4
4.8
16.0
30.0%
45.0%
30.8%
37.2%
7.0%
20.9%
9.3%
37.2%
10
20
13
43
10.0
20.0
13.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
23.3%
46.5%
30.2%
100.0%
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
Total
11
Count
Total
>2 Jam
Expected Count
Ada
1-2 Jam
.973a
.974
.002
df
2
2
1
.615
.614
.960
124
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 3.72.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences
Absolute
.083
Positive
.072
Negative
-.083
.264
1.000
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur
20
27
20.1
6.9
27.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
62.5%
63.6%
62.8%
% of Total
46.5%
16.3%
62.8%
12
16
11.9
4.1
16.0
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
37.5%
36.4%
37.2%
% of Total
27.9%
9.3%
37.2%
32
11
43
32.0
11.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.4%
25.6%
100.0%
Expected Count
Ada
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
.005a
.000
.005
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
1
1
1
.946
1.000
.946
1.000
.621
125
Linear-by-Linear
.004
1
.947
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur
Tidak
Ada
Count
10
12
27
3.1
13.8
10.0
27.0
100.0%
45.5%
75.0%
62.8%
11.6%
23.3%
27.9%
62.8%
12
16
1.9
8.2
6.0
16.0
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
.0%
54.5%
25.0%
37.2%
% of Total
.0%
27.9%
9.3%
37.2%
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Ada
Count
Expected Count
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
22
16
43
5.0
22.0
16.0
43.0
100.0% 100.0%
% of Total
11.6%
51.2%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
6.814a
8.454
.002
43
df
2
2
1
.033
.015
.964
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.86.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences
Total
Absolute
.194
Positive
.185
Negative
-.194
100.0% 100.0%
37.2% 100.0%
126
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur
.616
.842
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Didampingi
Total
23
27
3.8
23.2
27.0
66.7%
62.2%
62.8%
9.3%
53.5%
62.8%
14
16
2.2
13.8
16.0
33.3%
37.8%
37.2%
4.7%
32.6%
37.2%
37
43
6.0
37.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
14.0%
86.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
.045a
1
.832
b
Continuity Correction
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.045
1
.831
Fisher's Exact Test
1.000
Linear-by-Linear
.044
1
.834
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.23.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.606
127
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Percent
Normal
30
69.8
69.8
69.8
13
30.2
30.2
100.0
Total
43
100.0
100.0
Total
Count
12
13
Expected Count
3.9
9.1
13.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
92.3%
3.3% 30.2%
% of Total
27.9%
2.3% 30.2%
Total
Normal
29
30
9.1
20.9
30.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
7.7%
96.7% 69.8%
% of Total
2.3%
67.4% 69.8%
Count
Expected Count
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
% of Total
13
30
43
13.0
30.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
30.2%
69.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
34.041a
29.953
36.883
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
1
1
1
.000
.000
.000
.000
33.249
43
.000
.000
128
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.93.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Durasi
Menonton Televisi (>2 jam
per hari / <1 jam dan 1-2 jam
per hari)
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
348.000
20.084
6029.883
27.692
4.006
191.436
.080
.012
.524
43
Total
13
19
32
9.7
22.3
32.0
100.0%
63.3%
74.4%
30.2%
44.2%
74.4%
11
11
3.3
7.7
11.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
.0%
36.7%
25.6%
% of Total
.0%
25.6%
25.6%
Expected Count
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
% of Total
>24 Bulan Count
Expected Count
Total
Normal
Count
Expected Count
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
% of Total
13
30
43
13.0
30.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
30.2%
69.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
6.405a
4.624
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
1
1
.011
.032
129
Likelihood Ratio
9.473
1
.002
Fisher's Exact Test
.019
Linear-by-Linear
6.256
1
.012
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.009
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases
Lower
.594
Upper
.446
.791
43
Hiburan dan
Keduanya
Edukasi
Count
Expected Count
Total
10
28
38
11.5
26.5
38.0
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
76.9%
93.3% 88.4%
% of Total
23.3%
65.1% 88.4%
Count
Expected Count
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
% of Total
Total
Normal
Count
Expected Count
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
% of Total
1.5
3.5
5.0
23.1%
6.7% 11.6%
7.0%
4.7% 11.6%
13
30
43
13.0
30.0
43.0
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
30.2%
69.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
2.377a
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
df
1
.123
130
Continuity Correctionb
1.048
1
.306
Likelihood Ratio
2.171
1
.141
Fisher's Exact Test
.153
Linear-by-Linear
2.322
1
.128
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.51.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.153
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Program
Televisi yang ditonton
(Hiburan dan Keduanya /
Edukasi)
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
.238
.035
1.639
.439
.180
1.070
1.842
.619
5.480
43
Count
1.8
4.2
6.0
23.1%
10.0%
14.0%
7.0%
7.0%
14.0%
10
27
37
11.2
25.8
37.0
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
76.9%
90.0%
86.0%
% of Total
23.3%
62.8%
86.0%
13
30
43
30.0
43.0
Expected Count
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
Total
Total
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
Didampingi
Normal
Count
Expected Count
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
% of Total
13.0
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
30.2%
69.8% 100.0%
131
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
1.292a
1
.256
Continuity Correctionb
.432
1
.511
Likelihood Ratio
1.204
1
.273
Fisher's Exact Test
.345
Linear-by-Linear
1.262
1
.261
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh (Tidak
Didampingi / Didampingi)
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases
Lower
Upper
2.700
.466
15.648
1.850
.709
4.829
.685
.301
1.562
43
.248
132
:
Ya
Tidak
: ____________________________
: ____________________________
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak
133
: __________________ orang
: a. Pembantu/pengasuh/babysitter
b. Kakek/nenek/bibi/paman
c. Tetangga/orang lain
: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________
Keterangan:
*lingkari yang benar
**anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah selain bapak dan ibu
***jumlah tanggungan adalah jumlah seluruh anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah
134
KUISIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN POLA MENONTON TELEVISI DENGAN
KETERLAMBATAN BICARA
Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
Nama anak : ___________________________________________________
TPA/PAUD : ___________________________________________________
Nama pengisi : ___________________________________________________
b. > 24 bulan
Jika ya, dengan siapa anak paling sering
didampingi saat menonton televisi?
a. Orang tua
b. Pengasuh/pembantu/baby sitter
c. Kakek/nenek/paman/bibi
Apa yang dilakukan pendamping/
pengasuh saat anak menonton televisi?
a. Menemani tanpa berinteraksi
dengan anak (hanya menonton
atau
sambil
mengerjakan
pekerjaan lain)
b. Menyuapi anak
c. Berinteraksi
dengan
anak
(mengajak
anak
berbicara,
menjelaskan,
memilihkan
program dan bercerita tentang
program yang ditonton anak)
Acara televisi yang paling disukai anak :
a. Kesenian (musik, tarian,gambar)
b. Olahraga
c. Flora fauna
d. Sinetron
e. Kartun (sebutkan) _________
f. Kuis
g. Pendidikan
h. Lain-lain (sebutkan)________
135
: __________
: _____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________
Waktu
(Jam : Menit)
Kegiatan Anak
Didampingi
Keterangan
Oleh
(jenis/judul tontonan)
Keterangan :
Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak
pada saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman /
bibi / teman / pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan
jenis/judul tayangan yang ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi .
136
: __________
: ____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________
Kegiatan Anak
Didampingi
Keterangan
Oleh
(jenis/judul tontonan)
Keterangan :
Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak pada
saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman / bibi / teman
/ pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan jenis/judul tayangan yang
ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi.
137
Nama pengisi
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
: Ani Safitri
NIM
: G2A009074
: Perempuan
Alamat
Riau
Nomor Telepon
: -
Nomor HP
: 085641196888
: dranisafitri074@yahoo.co.id
2. SMP
3. SMA
4. FK UNDIP
Keanggotaan Organisasi
1. (Belum ada)
Pengalaman penelitian
1. (Belum ada)
145