Sie sind auf Seite 1von 84

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Judarwanto Widodo. Keterlambatan bicara-speech delay. 2008. Available


from: http://www.keterlambatan-bicara.blogspot.com
2. Leung KA, Kao PC. Evaluation and management of the child with speech
delay. Am Fam Phys 1999;59:32-45.
3. Klinik Tumbuh Kembang Anak RS. Dr. Kariadi. Studi pendahuluan disfasia
perkembangan. Semarang; 2007.
4. Jonhston MV. Clinical disorder of brain plasticity. Brain dev 2004;26:73-80.
5. Mundkur N. Neuroplasticity in children. Indian J Pediatr 2005;72:855-7.
6. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committe on children with disabilities.
Role of the Pediatrician in family-centered early intervention service.
Pediatrics 2001;107:1155-7.
7. Vincer MJ, Cake H, Graven M, Dodds L, McHugh S, Fraboni T. A
population-based study to determine the performance of the cognitive adaptive
test/clinical linguistic and auditory milestone scale to predict the mental
developmental index at 18 months on the bayley scales of infant developmentII in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2005;116:864-7.
8. Accardo PJ, Capute AJ. The capute scales: Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical
Linguistic & Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT/CLAMS). Baltimore: Paul. H.
Brookes Publishing Co; 2005.
9. Terapul Tarigan, Nancy Ervani, Syamsidah Lubis. Pola menonton televisi dan
pengaruhnya terhadap anak. Sari Pediatri. 2007; 9(1):44-47. Available from:
http://www.idai.or.id/saripediatri/pdfile/9-1-8.pdf
10. Strategi pencegahan perilaku negatif pada anak-anak sebagai akibat tayangan
televisi dan model tayangan edukatif untuk anak-anak. Seminar Nasional
Implementasi Sistem Manajemen Kualitas ISO 9001-2008 dan IWA 2 dalam
Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Dosen dan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi UPN
Veteran Jawa Timur; 2009 Des 10; Surabaya: Ety D. Susanti, Yuli
Candrasari, Yudiana Indriastuti; 2008

62

63

11. Oka

Lely.

Jika

anak

terlambat

bicara.

2008.

Available

from

www.balipost.com
12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statement. Media use in children
younger than 2 years. J pediatrics 2011;128:5.
13. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Television and DVD/video
viewing in children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2007;161(5):473 479.
14. Victoria J. Rideout, Elizabeth A. Vandewater, Ellen A. Wartella. Zero to six:
electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Menlo Park,
CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. 2003.
15. Linebarger DL, Walker D. Infants and toddlers television viewing and
language outcomes. Am Behav Sci. 2005;48(5):624645.
16. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN. Associations between media
viewing and language development in children under age two years. J Pediatr.
2007;151(4):364 368.
17. Weerasak

Chonchaiya,

Chandhita

Pruksananond.

Television

viewing

associates with delayed language development. Acta Paediatr. 2008;


97(7):977982.
18. Anak Agung Ayu W. Antari, I Gusti Ayu T. Windiani, Djauhar Ismail.
Television watching time and cognitive development in young children.
Paediatrica Indonesiana. 2012; 52(1):32-37
19. Dworkin JP, Culatta RA . Oral structural and neuromuscular characteristics in
children with normal and disordered articulation. Journal of Speech and
Hearingm Disorders. 1985;50(2), 150-156.
20. Chaer A. Psiokolinguistik kajian teoritik. Jakarta: Rineka Abdi. 2003
21. Owens RE. Language Development an Introduction, 5th edition. New York:
Allyn and Bacon. 2001.
22. Webster RI. The clinical spectrum of developmental language impairment in
school aged children: language, cognitive and motor findings. Pediatrics
2006;118:1541-9.

64

23. Ansel BM, Landa RM, Stark-Selz RE. Development and disorders of speech
and language. In: Oski FA, DeAngelis CD, editors. Principles and practice of
pediatrics. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1994:686700.
24. Simkin Z, Conti G. Evidence of reading difficulty in subgroups of children
with specific language impairment. Child language teaching and therapy
2006;22:315-31.
25. Makum, AH. Gangguan perkembangan berbahasa. Buku ajar ilmu kesehatan
anak. Jakarta: Balai penerbit FKUI. 1991; 56-69.
26. Virginia W, Meredith G. Gangguan bicara dan bahasa. Buku ajar penyakit teli
nga, hidung, tenggorok. Jakarta : EGC. 1997 ; 397-410
27. Departemen Rehabilitasi Medik. Buku laporan pasien rawat jalan. Jakarta.
2006.
28. Wahjuni S. Pemeriksaan penyaring keterlambatan perkembangan bahasa pada
anak batita dengan Early Language Milestone Scale di kelurahan Paseban
Jakarta Pusat. Jakarta. 1998.
29. Smith C, Hill J. Language development and disorders of communication and
oral motor function. Pediatric Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus.
1999.p. 57-79.
30. Silva PA, Williams SM, McGee R. A longitudinal study of children with
developmental language delay at age three; later intelligence , reading and
behavior problems. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29;630-640.
31. Schwartz ER. Speech and language disorders. In: Schwartz MW, editor.
Pediatric primary care: a problem oriented approach. St. Louis: Mosby, 1990:
696700.
32. Coplan J. Evaluation of the child with delayed speech or language. Pediatr
Ann. 1985;14:2038.
33. Leung AK, Robson WL, Fagan J, Chopra S, Lim SH. Mental retardation.
J R Soc Health. 1995;115:319.
34. Leung AK, Robson WL. Otitis media in infants and children. Drug
Protocol. 1990;5:2935.

65

35. Schlieper A, Kisilevsky H, Mattingly S, Yorke L. Mild conductive hearing


loss and language development: a one year follow-up study. J Dev Behav
Pediatr. 1985;6:658.
36. Shonkoff JP. Language delay: late talking to communication disorder. In:
Rudolph AM, Hoffman JI, Rudolph CD, editors. Rudolph's pediatrics.
London: Prentice-Hall. 1996:1248.
37. Bishop DV. Developmental disorders of speech and language. In: Rutter M,
Taylor E, Hersov L, eds. Child and adolescent psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell
Science. 1994:54668.
38. Davis H, Stroud A, Green L. The maternal language environment of
children with language delay. Br J Disord Commun. 1988;23:25366.
39. American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on children with disabilities.
identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the
medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening.
Pediatrics 2006;118:405-19.
40. Dhamayanti Meita, Herlina Murfariza. Skrining gangguan kognitif dan bahasa
dengan menggunakan capute scales (Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical
Linguistic

and

Auditory

Milestone

Scale-Cat/Clams).

Sari

Pediatri.

2009;11(3):189-98).
41. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja. 2005.
42. Kamila B. Mistry, Cynthia S. Minkovitz, Donna M. Strobino and Dina L.G.
Children's television exposure and behavioral and social outcomes at 5.5
years: does timing of exposure matter? Pediatrics. Vol. 120(4), 2007:762-769
p. Available from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/
43. Amy B. Jordan, James C. Hersey, Judith A. McDivitt, Carrie D. Heitzler.
Reducing childrens television-viewing time: a qualitative study of parents
and their children. Pediatrics. Vol. 118(5), 2006:e1303-e1310 p. Available
from: http://www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/
44. Rideout VJ, Hamel E. The media family: electronic media in the lives of
infants, toddlers, preschoolers, and their parents. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser
Family Foundation; 2006.

66

45. Committee on Public Education. Media education, J. Pediatrics 1999;104:3423.


46. Roberts DF, Foehr UG. Kids and Media in America. Cambridge, United
Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
47. Vandewater EA, Park SE, Huang X, Wartella EA. No: you cant watch thatparental rules and young childrens media use.

Am Behav Sci.

2005;48(5):608-623.
48. Anderson DR, Evans MK. Peril and potential of media for infants and
toddlers. Zero to Three. 2001;22(2):10-16.
49. Kirkorian HL, Pempek TA, Murphy LA, Schmidt ME, Anderson DR. The
impact of background television on parent-child interaction. Child Dev.
2009;80(5):1350-1359.
50. Hart B, Risley TR. Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of
Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1995.
51. Masako T, Okuma K, Kyoshima K. Television viewing and reduced parental
utterance, and delayed speech development in infants and young children.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(6):618-619.
52. Schmidt ME, Pempek TA, Kirkorian HL, Lund AF, Anderson DR. The effects
of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children.
Child Dev. 2008;79(4):1137-1151.
53. Dimitri A. Christakis. The effects of infant media usage: what do we know
and what should we learn? Acta Paediatrica 2009;98: 8-16.
54. Hooper ML, Chang P. Comparison of demands of sustained attentional events
between public and private childrens television programming. Percept Mot
Skills. 1998; 86:431434.
55. Amy Nathanson. Parental mediation of media effects. In Schement, Jorge
Reina, et al, editors. Encyclopedia of communication and information. New
York: Macmillan reference USA; 2002. p. 154-175
56. M. Sopiyudin Dahlan. Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan. Edisi ke-5.
Jakarta: Salemba Medika; 2011.

67

Lampiran 1. Ethical clearance

68

Lampiran 2. Surat permohonan ethical clearance

69

Lampiran 3. Surat rujukan

70

71

Lampiran 4. Informed Consent

LEMBAR INFORMASI CALON SUBJEK


JUDUL PENELITIAN

PENELITI

Hubungan
Pola
Menonton
Televisi
dengan
Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun
di Semarang
Ani Safitri

Bapak/Ibu Yth,
Saya mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro yang melakukan
penelitian dengan judul Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan
Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang. Penelitian ini telah memiliki izin
tertulis dari pihak-pihak yang berwenang. Dalam penelitian ini, saya ingin mencari
informasi mengenai pola menonton televisi dan keterlambatan bicara pada anak usia 1-3
tahun. Saya akan menjelaskan tujuan, tata cara penelitian, dan menanyakan kesediaan
untuk berpartisipasi kepada orang tua responden sebagai wakil dari responden. Jika orang
tua responden bersedia, orang tua responden akan menjalani wawancara dan responden
akan menjalani pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara. Tidak terdapat risiko negatif pada
penelitian ini. Orang tua responden hanya diminta meluangkan waktu untuk melakukan
wawancara dan memberi izin saya untuk melakukan pemeriksaan keterlambatan bicara
pada responden. Dengan berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini, orang tua responden dapat
mengetahui lebih dini apakah responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara
sehingga dapat ditindaklanjuti dengan cepat dan tepat. Seluruh informasi yang didapatkan
selama penelitan termasuk data pribadi dan data penelitian akan dijaga kerahasiaannya.
Nama responden atau dokumen lain yang mengidentifikasikan responden sebagai subjek
penelitian tidak akan dibuka tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari orang tua responden. Apabila
ditengah perjalanan orang tua responden mengundurkan diri dari penelitian, saya sangat
menghargai keputusan tersebut dan tidak akan mengenakan sanksi apapun. Jika
responden diduga mengalami keterlambatan bicara, akan dirujuk ke Klinik Tumbuh
Kembang Anak RSUP Dr. Kariadi dengan dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) sebagai
penanggung jawab.
Jika Bapak/Ibu mempunyai pertanyaan mengenai penelitian ini, dapat menghubungi:
Ani Safitri (085641196888)
dr. Fitri Hartanto, Sp.A (K) (pembimbing)
dr. Gana Adyaksa, MSi.Med ( pembimbing)
FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS DIPENOGORO SEMARANG
Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH. Tembalang ,Semarang, Kotak Pos 1269
No Telpon
: 024-76928011
Faksimile
: 024-76928011
Email
: dean_fmdu@undip.ac.id

72

LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN SUBJEK PENELITIAN


(Informed Consent)
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama
:
Alamat
:
Telp
:
Orangtua kandung/wali dari:
Nama
:
TPA / PAUD
:
Menerangkan bahwa setelah menerima sepenuhnya penjelasan tentang penelitian
Hubungan Pola Menonton Televisi dengan Keterlambatan Bicara, Studi pada Anak Usia
1-3 Tahun di Semarang saya, mewakili responden, menyatakan
SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU
untuk ikut dalam penelitian ini.
Demikian surat persetujuan ini kami buat dengan sesungguhnya dan penuh
kesadaran untuk dapat dipergunakan sebagaimana mestinya.

Peneliti

Semarang, ........................ 2013


Orang tua/wali yang menyetujui

(Ani Safitri)

(........................................)

Mengetahui saksi-saksi

1. _______________________

2. _______________________

73

Lampiran 5. Spreadsheet data penelitian


No Nama Usia
Sex
(bulan)

NA

25

Lakilaki

FF

19

Perem
puan

FT

30

Perem
puan

AF

33

Lakilaki

AK

23

Lakilaki

LS

32

Perem
puan

SA

30

Perem
puan

DA

32

Lakilaki

MA

29

Perem
puan

10

ZP

29

11

SH

34

Lakilaki
Lakilaki

Pendidikan Pendidikan pekerjaan pekerjaa Status Pengasuh Pendidikan Jumlah TV di


Durasi
Onset
Program Pendampingan Intepretasi
Ayah
Ibu
ayah
n ibu ekonomi
pengasuh TV
kamar menonton menonton
TV
Capute
TV
TV
hiburan
Suspek
Perguruan Perguruan
Orang
Tidak >2 jam per
dan
Keterlambatan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Bicara
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
Tidak
SMA
SMA
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Perguruan
Orang
1-2 jam per
dan
Tinggi
SMA
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
Tidak
Tidak 1-2 jam per
Tidak
SMA
SMA
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara
SD
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan Edukasi Didampingi
Normal
hiburan
Suspek
Perguruan Perguruan
>
>2 jam per
dan
Keterlambatan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Saudara
SMP
1buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Bicara
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Perguruan Perguruan
Orang
1-2 jam per
dan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Tidak
Orang
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
SMA
SMA
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Perguruan Perguruan
Orang
1-2 jam per
dan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SD
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Perguruan Perguruan
Tidak
Orang
>
1-2 jam per
dan
Tidak
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Lain
SMA
1buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Perguruan Perguruan
Orang
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
Perguruan Perguruan
Tidak <1 jam dan
hiburan
Suspek
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Tinggi
Saudara
SD
1 buah Ada 1-2 jam per 0-24 Bulan
dan
Didampingi Keterlambatan

74

hari
Perem Perguruan Perguruan
puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

12 CQ

34

13 AD

34

14

NI

19

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

15

FA

25

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

16

KB

34

17 MQ

23

18 MN

34

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

19 HA

31

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

20

TA

23

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

21

BB

23

22 MA

33

23

27

AC

Lakilaki

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi
Lakilaki

SMA

SMA

Bekerja

SMA

Bekerja

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

SMA

Orang
Lain

SMA

keduanya

Tidak >2 jam per


1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan Edukasi

Bicara
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara

Tidak >2 jam per


Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan Edukasi
hiburan
Orang Perguruan
>
Tidak >2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Menengah Lain
Tinggi 1buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Orang
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SD
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
hiburan
Suspek
Orang Perguruan
>
Tidak >2 jam per
dan
Tidak
Keterlambatan
Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
Tinggi 1buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Bicara
Suspek
Orang
Tidak >2 jam per
Tidak
Keterlambatan
Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan Edukasi Didampingi
Bicara
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Orang
>
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Orang
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
>
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Tinggi
Saudara
SMA
1buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Orang
>
1-2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Tinggi
Lain
SMA
1buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
Orang
Tidak 1-2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Menengah Lain
SMA
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
<1 jam dan
hiburan
1-2 jam per
dan
Bekerja Tinggi
Saudara
SD
1 buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan keduanya Didampingi
Normal
Tinggi

1 buah

75

AA

25

Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi

25 KM

34

Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi

Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

SMA

1 buah

Tidak
Ada

26

21

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

SD

>
1buah

Ada

Ada

24

ER

Orang
Lain

SMA

SMA

>
1buah

Ada

Perguruan
Tinggi

SMA

Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang
Lain

Perguruan
Tinggi 1 buah

27

Perem Perguruan
puan
Tinggi

SMA

Bekerja Bekerja

Orang
Lain

Perguruan
Tidak
Tinggi 1 buah Ada

29 AKA

24

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

30 MKM

36

31 AMI

30

32 KTA

32

Lakilaki

33 CRY

31

Lakilaki

34 KZP

25

35 ASD

32

36 KAT

23

27 MAH

31

28 ARJ

Lakilaki

SMA

Tidak
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Lakilaki

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

1 buah

Tidak
Ada

Perguruan
Tinggi 1 buah

Ada

SMA

>2 jam per


hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
>24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
>24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
>24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
0-24 Bulan

hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Saudara

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

Perguruan
Tidak
Tinggi 1 buah Ada

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

Perguruan
Tidak >2 jam per
Tinggi 1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Saudara

SMP

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

SMA

Tidak >2 jam per


Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
Tidak 1-2 jam per
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang
Lain

SMA

1 buah

Perem Perguruan Perguruan Bekerja Bekerja

Tinggi

Orang

SMA

1 buah Tidak <1 jam dan 0-24 Bulan hiburan

Lakilaki

1 buah

Tidak >2 jam per


Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan

Suspek
Tidak
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara

Didampingi

Normal
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara
Didampingi

Normal

76

puan

Tinggi

Tinggi

Lain

Ada

37 KSP

21

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

SD

>
1buah

Ada

38 MPA

35

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Orang
Lain

SMP

>
1buah

Ada

39 MPRN

15

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja

Orang
Lain

SMP

>
1buah

Ada

40 FJV

27

Lakilaki

Perguruan Perguruan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang
Lain

SMA

>
1buah

Ada

41 ART

19

Perem Perguruan Perguruan


puan
Tinggi
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah Saudara

42 ARL

32

Perem
puan

SMA

Perguruan
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang
Lain

SMA

43 BGA

29

Lakilaki

SMA

Perguruan
Tinggi
Bekerja Bekerja Menengah

Orang
Lain

SMA

Tinggi

Saudara

Tinggi

Tinggi

SD

1-2 jam per


hari
>2 jam per
hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
hari
0-24 Bulan

>2 jam per


hari
0-24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
Tidak 1-2 jam per
1 buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
Tidak 1-2 jam per
1 buah Ada
hari
>24 Bulan
<1 jam dan
1-2 jam per
1 buah Ada
hari
0-24 Bulan

dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya
hiburan
dan
keduanya

Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara

Didampingi

Normal

Didampingi

Normal
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Didampingi
Bicara

Edukasi Didampingi
hiburan
dan
keduanya Didampingi
hiburan
dan
keduanya Didampingi

Normal

Normal

Normal

77

Lampiran 6. Hasil analisis penelitian


Durasi Menonton Televisi
Descriptives
Durasi Menonton Televisi
Usia dalam Bulan <1 Jam

Mean

27.00

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

23.20

5% Trimmed Mean

27.11

Median

28.50

Variance

28.222

Std. Deviation

1-2 Jam

1.680

30.80

5.312

Minimum

19

Maximum

33

Range

14

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.506

.687

Kurtosis

-1.195

1.334

Mean

28.75

1.222

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

26.19

5% Trimmed Mean

29.11

Median

29.50

Variance

29.882

Std. Deviation

31.31

5.466

Minimum

15

Maximum

36

Range

21

Interquartile Range

>2 Jam

Statistic Std. Error

Skewness

-.872

.512

Kurtosis

.440

.992

Mean

27.69

1.491

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

24.44

5% Trimmed Mean

27.82

Median

27.00

Variance

28.897

Std. Deviation
Minimum

30.94

5.376
19

78

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.161

.616

Kurtosis

-1.558

1.191

Tests of Normality
Durasi
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Menonton
Televisi
Statistic
df
Sig.

Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic

Sig.

.896

10

.198

Usia dalam Bulan <1 Jam

.214

10

1-2 Jam

.168

20

.140

.931

20

.161

13

.898

13

.124

>2 Jam
.192
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

.200

df

.200

Oneway
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Usia dalam Bulan
Levene Statistic

df1

.095

df2
2

Sig.
40

.910

ANOVA
Usia dalam Bulan
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

df

22.458
1168.519
1190.977

Mean Square
2
40
42

11.229
29.213

Sig.
.384

.683

Onset Menonton Televisi


Descriptives
Onset Menonton Televisi
Usia dalam Bulan 0-24 Bulan Mean

Statistic Std. Error


27.97

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

25.98

5% Trimmed Mean

28.18

Median

29.50

Variance

30.289

Std. Deviation

29.95

5.504

Minimum

15

Maximum

36

Range

21

.973

79

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.391

.414

Kurtosis

-.817

.809

28.18

1.512

>24 Bulan Mean


95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound
for Mean
Upper Bound

24.81

5% Trimmed Mean

28.37

Median

29.00

Variance

25.164

31.55

Std. Deviation

5.016

Minimum

19

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

Skewness
Kurtosis

-1.159

.661

.442

1.279

Tests of Normality
Onset
Menonton
Televisi

Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

Usia dalam Bulan 0-24 Bulan

.144

32

.090

.931

32

.041

>24 Bulan
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

.225

11

.125

.842

11

.033

Descriptives
Onset Menonton Televisi
trans_usia

0-24 Bulan

Statistic

Mean
95% Confidence Interval
for Mean

1.4377
Lower Bound

1.4045

Upper Bound

1.4709

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4438

Median

1.4698

Variance
Std. Deviation

Std. Error
.01629

.008
.09213

Minimum

1.18

Maximum

1.56

Range

.38

Interquartile Range

.16

Skewness

-.806

.414

Kurtosis

.350

.809

80

>24 Bulan

Mean

1.4427

95% Confidence Interval


for Mean

Lower Bound

1.3844

Upper Bound

1.5009

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4469

Median

1.4624

Variance

.02615

.008

Std. Deviation

.08672

Minimum

1.28

Maximum

1.53

Range

.25

Interquartile Range

.07

Skewness

-1.383

.661

.853

1.279

Kurtosis
Tests of Normality
Onset
Menonton
Televisi
trans_usia

Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic

0-24 Bulan

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

.166

32

.026

.910

32

.011

>24 Bulan
.266
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

11

.028

.791

11

.007

Mann-Whitney Test
Test Statisticsb
Usia dalam
Bulan
Mann-Whitney U
172.500
Wilcoxon W
238.500
Z
-.098
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.922
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
.924a
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Grouping Variable: Onset Menonton Televisi
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Descriptives
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Usia dalam Bulan Edukasi

Statistic Std. Error

Mean

28.60

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

19.79

5% Trimmed Mean

28.83

Median

33.00

37.41

3.172

81

Variance
Std. Deviation

Hiburan

50.300
7.092

Minimum

19

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

13

Skewness

-.771

.913

Kurtosis

-2.293

2.000

Mean

27.64

1.146

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

25.25

5% Trimmed Mean

27.91

Median

29.50

Variance

28.909

Std. Deviation

30.02

5.377

Minimum

15

Maximum

35

Range

20

Interquartile Range

Skewness

-.736

.491

Kurtosis

-.230

.953

28.38

1.251

Keduanya Mean
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound
for Mean
Upper Bound

25.71

5% Trimmed Mean

28.47

Median

29.00

Variance

25.050

Std. Deviation

31.04

5.005

Minimum

19

Maximum

36

Range

17

Interquartile Range

10

Skewness

-.195

.564

Kurtosis

-.993

1.091

82

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova

Program
Televisi
yang
ditonton

Statistic

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

Usia dalam Bulan Edukasi

.333

.074

.792

.070

Hiburan

.170

22

.098

.932

22

.133

16

.952

16

.523

Keduanya
.125
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

.200

Oneway
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Usia dalam Bulan
Levene Statistic

df1

1.002

df2
2

Sig.
40

.376

ANOVA
Usia dalam Bulan
Sum of Squares
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total

df

6.936
1184.041
1190.977

Mean Square
2
40
42

3.468
29.601

Sig.
.117

.890

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Descriptives
Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Usia dalam
Bulan

Tidak
Didampingi

Statistic Std. Error

Mean
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean

27.17
Lower Bound

21.00

Upper Bound

33.34

5% Trimmed Mean

27.24

Median

27.00

Variance

34.567

Std. Deviation

Didampingi

2.400

5.879

Minimum

19

Maximum

34

Range

15

Interquartile Range

11

Skewness

-.153

.845

Kurtosis

-1.492

1.741

28.16

.872

Mean
95% Confidence

Lower Bound

26.39

83

Interval for Mean

Upper Bound

29.93

5% Trimmed Mean

28.38

Median

30.00

Variance

28.140

Std. Deviation

5.305

Minimum

15

Maximum

36

Range

21

Interquartile Range

Skewness

-.589

.388

Kurtosis

-.513

.759

Tests of Normality
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Usia dalam
Bulan

Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Statistic

Tidak
Didampingi

.173

Didampingi
.149
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.
6
37

Statistic

df

Sig.

.949

.729

.037

.939

37

.043

.200

Descriptives
Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
trans_usia

Tidak
Didampingi

Mean

1.4251

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

1.3227

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4274

Median

1.4302

Variance
Std. Deviation

Didampingi

Statistic Std. Error


.03983

1.5275

.010
.09758

Minimum

1.28

Maximum

1.53

Range

.25

Interquartile Range

.18

Skewness

-.434

.845

Kurtosis

-.986

1.741

Mean

1.4412

.01474

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound


for Mean
Upper Bound

1.4113
1.4711

84

5% Trimmed Mean

1.4473

Median

1.4771

Variance

.008

Std. Deviation

.08969

Minimum

1.18

Maximum

1.56

Range

.38

Interquartile Range

.13

Skewness

-.996

.388

Kurtosis

.630

.759

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova

Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
trans_usia

Statistic

Tidak Didampingi

df

.164

Didampingi
.169
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.
6
37

Statistic

df

Sig.

.946

.707

.009

.906

37

.004

.200

Mann-Whitney Test
Test Statisticsb
Usia dalam
Bulan
Mann-Whitney U
99.500
Wilcoxon W
120.500
Z
-.405
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
.686
Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
.694a
a. Not corrected for ties.
b. Grouping Variable: Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
Jenis Kelamin * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

Perempuan

Count

1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

20

4.7

9.3

6.0

20.0

40.0%

40.0%

61.5%

46.5%

9.3%

18.6%

18.6%

46.5%

12

23

85

Expected Count

Total

5.3

10.7

7.0

23.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

60.0%

60.0%

38.5%

53.5%

% of Total

14.0%

27.9%

11.6%

53.5%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
1.691a
2
.429
Likelihood Ratio
1.697
2
.428
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.169
1
.280
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 4.65.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.183

Positive

.183

Negative

.000
.597
.868

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin
Jenis Kelamin * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi


0-24 Bulan
Jenis Kelamin

Laki-laki

Count

Total

17

20

14.9

5.1

20.0

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

53.1%

27.3%

46.5%

% of Total

39.5%

7.0%

46.5%

15

23

17.1

5.9

23.0

Expected Count

Perempuan

>24 Bulan

Count
Expected Count

86

Total

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

46.9%

72.7%

53.5%

% of Total

34.9%

18.6%

53.5%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

df

2.199a
1.283
2.274

1
1
1

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.138
.257
.132
.175

2.148

.128

.143

43

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.12.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Jenis Kelamin * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

Perempuan Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

Hiburan Keduanya

Total

20

2.3

10.2

7.4

20.0

40.0%

40.9%

56.3%

46.5%

4.7%

20.9%

20.9%

46.5%

13

23

2.7

11.8

8.6

23.0

60.0%

59.1%

43.8%

53.5%

7.0%

30.2%

16.3%

53.5%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

87

Chi-Square Tests
Value

Df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.973a
2
.615
Likelihood Ratio
.974
2
.615
Linear-by-Linear Association
.766
1
.381
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.146

Positive

.146

Negative

.000
.476
.977

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jenis Kelamin
Jenis Kelamin * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua /


Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Jenis Kelamin Laki-laki

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Perempuan

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Didampingi

Total

18

20

2.8

17.2

20.0

33.3%

48.6%

46.5%

4.7%

41.9%

46.5%

19

23

3.2

19.8

23.0

66.7%

51.4%

53.5%

9.3%

44.2%

53.5%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

88

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.487a
1
.485
b
Continuity Correction
.066
1
.798
Likelihood Ratio
.497
1
.481
Fisher's Exact Test
.669
Linear-by-Linear
.475
1
.490
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.403

Status Gizi * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi Menonton
Televisi
% of Total

1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Status Gizi * Onset Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
0-24 Bulan
Status Gizi

Gizi Baik

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total

Status Gizi * Program Televisi yang ditonton

>24 Bulan

Total

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

89

Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Status Gizi Gizi Baik Count

% of Total
Total

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

Expected Count

% of Total

Total

22

Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

Keduanya

Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

Hiburan

Status Gizi * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Status Gizi

Gizi Baik Count


Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Didampingi

Total

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir SMA
Ayah

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count

Total

1.4

2.8

1.8

6.0

40.0%

10.0%

.0%

14.0%

9.3%

4.7%

.0%

14.0%

18

13

37

8.6

17.2

11.2

37.0

90

Total

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

60.0%

90.0% 100.0%

86.0%

% of Total

14.0%

41.9%

30.2%

86.0%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Onset Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ayah

SMA

Count

4.5

1.5

6.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

15.6%

9.1%

14.0%

% of Total

11.6%

2.3%

14.0%

27

10

37

27.5

9.5

37.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

84.4%

90.9%

86.0%

% of Total

62.8%

23.3%

86.0%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

Expected Count

Perguruan
Tinggi

Total

Total

Count
Expected Count

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

74.4%

25.6% 100.0%

% of Total
Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab

Program Televisi yang


ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total
Pendidikan Terakhir SMA
Ayah

Count

Expected Count

.7

3.1

2.2

6.0

20.0%

18.2%

6.3%

14.0%

2.3%

9.3%

2.3%

14.0%

18

15

37

4.3

18.9

13.8

37.0

% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count

91

% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

80.0%

81.8%

93.8%

86.0%

9.3%

41.9%

34.9%

86.0%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0%

37.2% 100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ayah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua
/ Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir SMA
Ayah

Count

Expected Count

.8

5.2

6.0

33.3%

10.8%

14.0%

4.7%

9.3%

14.0%

33

37

5.2

31.8

37.0

66.7%

89.2%

86.0%

9.3%

76.7%

86.0%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%

Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir SMA
Ibu

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

Total

10

2.3

4.7

3.0

10.0

60.0%

15.0%

7.7%

23.3%

92

% of Total
Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

14.0%

7.0%

2.3%

23.3%

17

12

33

7.7

15.3

10.0

33.0

40.0%

85.0%

92.3%

76.7%

9.3%

39.5%

27.9%

76.7%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
10.093a
2
.006
Likelihood Ratio
9.222
2
.010
Linear-by-Linear Association
7.795
1
.005
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.479

Positive

.000

Negative

-.479
1.326
.059

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu
Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab

Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Ibu

SMA

Count

Total

10

7.4

2.6

10.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

21.9%

27.3%

23.3%

% of Total

16.3%

7.0%

23.3%

Expected Count

93

Perguruan
Tinggi

Total

Count

25

33

24.6

8.4

33.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

78.1%

72.7%

76.7%

% of Total

58.1%

18.6%

76.7%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.134a
1
.715
b
Continuity Correction
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.130
1
.718
Fisher's Exact Test
.698
Linear-by-Linear
.131
1
.718
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.504

Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Program Televisi yang ditonton


Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pendidikan Terakhir SMA
Ibu

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count

Total

10

1.2

5.1

3.7

10.0

20.0%

31.8%

12.5%

23.3%

2.3%

16.3%

4.7%

23.3%

15

14

33

3.8

16.9

12.3

33.0

80.0%

68.2%

87.5%

76.7%

9.3%

34.9%

32.6%

76.7%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

94

% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total

11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0%

37.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
1.971a
2
.373
Likelihood Ratio
2.060
2
.357
Linear-by-Linear Association
.731
1
.393
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.16.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.224

Positive

.021

Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu

-.224
.621
.835

Pendidikan Terakhir Ibu * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua
/ Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir SMA
Ibu

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

10

1.4

8.6

10.0

50.0%

18.9%

23.3%

7.0%

16.3%

23.3%

30

33

4.6

28.4

33.0

50.0%

81.1%

76.7%

7.0%

69.8%

76.7%

95

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
2.794a
1
.095
b
Continuity Correction
1.324
1
.250
Likelihood Ratio
2.431
1
.119
Fisher's Exact Test
.127
Linear-by-Linear
2.729
1
.099
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.127

Pekerjaan Ayah * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Pekerjaan Ayah * Onset Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
0-24 Bulan
Pekerjaan Ayah

Bekerja

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi

>24 Bulan

Total

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

96

% of Total
Total

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total

Pekerjaan Ayah * Program Televisi yang ditonton


Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja Count

% of Total
Total

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

Expected Count

% of Total

Total

22

Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

Keduanya

Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

Hiburan

Pekerjaan Ayah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Pekerjaan Ayah Bekerja

Count

% of Total
Total

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh

Didampingi

Pekerjaan Ibu * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam

1-2 Jam

>2 Jam

Total

97

Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count

.9

1.9

1.2

4.0

20.0%

5.0%

7.7%

9.3%

4.7%

2.3%

2.3%

9.3%

19

12

39

9.1

18.1

11.8

39.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

80.0%

95.0%

92.3%

90.7%

% of Total

18.6%

44.2%

27.9%

90.7%

Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Bekerja

Count
Expected Count

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
1.835a
2
.399
Likelihood Ratio
1.615
2
.446
Linear-by-Linear Association
.831
1
.362
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .93.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.295

Positive

.000

Negative

-.295
.562
.911

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu
Pekerjaan IBu * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi


0-24 Bulan
Pekerjaan IBu

Tidak Bekerja Count


Expected Count

>24 Bulan

Total

3.0

1.0

4.0

98

Bekerja

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

9.4%

9.1%

9.3%

% of Total

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

29

10

39

29.0

10.0

39.0

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

90.6%

90.9%

90.7%

% of Total

67.4%

23.3%

90.7%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.001a
1
.978
b
Continuity Correction
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.001
1
.978
Fisher's Exact Test
1.000
Linear-by-Linear
.001
1
.978
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.02.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.733

Pekerjaan IBu * Program Televisi yang ditonton


Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Bekerja

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count

Hiburan Keduanya

Total

.5

2.0

1.5

4.0

20.0%

4.5%

12.5%

9.3%

2.3%

2.3%

4.7%

9.3%

21

14

39

4.5

20.0

14.5

39.0

80.0%

95.5%

87.5%

90.7%

9.3%

48.8%

32.6%

90.7%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

99

% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
1.462a
1.418
.000
43

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
2
2
1

.481
.492
.985

a. 4 cells (66.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .47.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.147

Positive

.141

Negative

-.147
.281
1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pekerjaan IBu
Pekerjaan IBu * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua /


Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Pekerjaan IBu Tidak Bekerja Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Bekerja

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count

Didampingi

Total

.6

3.4

4.0

50.0%

2.7%

9.3%

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

36

39

5.4

33.6

39.0

50.0%

97.3%

90.7%

7.0%

83.7%

90.7%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100

% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
13.689a
1
.000
b
Continuity Correction
8.657
1
.003
Likelihood Ratio
9.103
1
.003
Fisher's Exact Test
.006
Linear-by-Linear
13.371
1
.000
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.006

Status Ekonomi * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count

12

2.8

5.6

3.6

12.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

50.0%

20.0%

23.1%

27.9%

% of Total

11.6%

9.3%

7.0%

27.9%

16

10

31

7.2

14.4

9.4

31.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

50.0%

80.0%

76.9%

72.1%

% of Total

11.6%

37.2%

23.3%

72.1%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Expected Count

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association

Total

Count

Total

>2 Jam

Expected Count

Tinggi

1-2 Jam

3.198a
2.994
1.715

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
2
2
1

.202
.224
.190

101

N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.79.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.255

Positive

.000

Negative

-.255
.751
.625

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi
Status Ekonomi * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi


0-24 Bulan
Status Ekonomi

Menengah

Count

12

8.9

3.1

12.0

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

21.9%

45.5%

27.9%

% of Total

16.3%

11.6%

27.9%

25

31

23.1

7.9

31.0

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

78.1%

54.5%

72.1%

% of Total

58.1%

14.0%

72.1%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count

Total

Total

Expected Count

Tinggi

>24 Bulan

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

df

2.262a
1.242
2.139

1
1
1

.133
.265
.144

2.210

.137

Exact Sig. (2sided)

.241

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.133

102

N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Status Ekonomi * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

Hiburan Keduanya

12

1.4

6.1

4.5

12.0

40.0%

36.4%

12.5%

27.9%

4.7%

18.6%

4.7%

27.9%

14

14

31

3.6

15.9

11.5

31.0

60.0%

63.6%

87.5%

72.1%

7.0%

32.6%

32.6%

72.1%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
3.033a
2
.219
Likelihood Ratio
3.290
2
.193
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.516
1
.113
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.40.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Total

Absolute

.285

Positive

.000

Negative

-.285
.838
.484

103

Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.285

Positive

.000

Negative

-.285
.838
.484

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Status Ekonomi
Status Ekonomi * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua /


Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Status Ekonomi Menengah Count

12

1.7

10.3

12.0

66.7%

21.6%

27.9%

9.3%

18.6%

27.9%

29

31

4.3

26.7

31.0

33.3%

78.4%

72.1%

4.7%

67.4%

72.1%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

% of Total
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh

Didampingi

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

5.207a
3.209
4.646

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

df
1
1
1

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.022
.073
.031
.042

5.086

.024

43

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.

.042

104

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
5.207a
1
.022
b
Continuity Correction
3.209
1
.073
Likelihood Ratio
4.646
1
.031
Fisher's Exact Test
.042
Linear-by-Linear
5.086
1
.024
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.042

Pengasuh Anak * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Pengasuh Anak Saudara

Count

>2 Jam

Total

10

2.3

4.7

3.0

10.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

50.0%

10.0%

23.1%

23.3%

% of Total

11.6%

4.7%

7.0%

23.3%

18

10

33

7.7

15.3

10.0

33.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

50.0%

90.0%

76.9%

76.7%

% of Total

11.6%

41.9%

23.3%

76.7%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Expected Count

Orang Lain Count


Expected Count

Total

1-2 Jam

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
5.977a
2
.050
Likelihood Ratio
5.730
2
.057
Linear-by-Linear Association
1.748
1
.186
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.33.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

105

Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.348

Positive

.000

Negative

-.348
.965
.309

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak
Pengasuh Anak * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab

Onset Menonton Televisi


0-24 Bulan
Pengasuh Anak

Saudara

Count

10

7.4

2.6

10.0

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

25.0%

18.2%

23.3%

% of Total

18.6%

4.7%

23.3%

24

33

24.6

8.4

33.0

% within Onset Menonton


Televisi

75.0%

81.8%

76.7%

% of Total

55.8%

20.9%

76.7%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count

Total

Total

Expected Count

Orang Lain

>24 Bulan

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset Menonton
Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.213a
1
.644
b
Continuity Correction
.002
1
.962
Likelihood Ratio
.221
1
.638
Fisher's Exact Test
1.000
Linear-by-Linear
.208
1
.648
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.56.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.496

106

Pengasuh Anak * Program Televisi yang ditonton


Crosstab
Program Televisi yang ditonton
Edukasi
Pengasuh Anak Saudara

Count

10

1.2

5.1

3.7

10.0

40.0%

18.2%

25.0%

23.3%

4.7%

9.3%

9.3%

23.3%

18

12

33

3.8

16.9

12.3

33.0

60.0%

81.8%

75.0%

76.7%

7.0%

41.9%

27.9%

76.7%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

% of Total
Orang Lain Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
1.130a
2
.568
Likelihood Ratio
1.055
2
.590
Linear-by-Linear Association
.094
1
.759
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.16.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Total

Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

Hiburan Keduanya

Absolute

.109

Positive

.036

Negative

-.109
.302
1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pengasuh Anak
Pengasuh Anak * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh

107

Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Pengasuh Anak Saudara

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total

10

1.4

8.6

10.0

33.3%

21.6%

23.3%

4.7%

18.6%

23.3%

29

33

4.6

28.4

33.0

66.7%

78.4%

76.7%

9.3%

67.4%

76.7%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Orang Lain Count


Expected Count

Didampingi

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.397a
1
.529
b
Continuity Correction
.012
1
.913
Likelihood Ratio
.370
1
.543
Fisher's Exact Test
.611
Linear-by-Linear
.388
1
.534
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.40.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.429

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir SD
Pengasuh Anak

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

Total

1.9

3.7

2.4

8.0

40.0%

15.0%

7.7%

18.6%

9.3%

7.0%

2.3%

18.6%

108

SMP

SMA

Count

Expected Count

.9

1.9

1.2

4.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

.0%

10.0%

15.4%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

4.7%

9.3%

12

24

5.6

11.2

7.3

24.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

50.0%

60.0%

53.8%

55.8%

% of Total

11.6%

27.9%

16.3%

55.8%

1.6

3.3

2.1

7.0

10.0%

15.0%

23.1%

16.3%

2.3%

7.0%

7.0%

16.3%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

Count
Expected Count

Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total

23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
5.654a
6
.463
Likelihood Ratio
6.128
6
.409
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.250
1
.134
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .93.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Durasi Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam 1-2 Jam >2 Jam
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count

Total

12

2.8

5.6

3.6

12.0

40.0%

25.0%

23.1%

27.9%

9.3%

11.6%

7.0%

27.9%

15

10

31

7.2

14.4

9.4

31.0

109

Total

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

60.0%

75.0%

76.9%

72.1%

% of Total

14.0%

34.9%

23.3%

72.1%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


23.3%

46.5%

30.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.962a
2
.618
Likelihood Ratio
.919
2
.632
Linear-by-Linear Association
.719
1
.396
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 2.79.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.140

Positive

.000

Negative
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh

-.140
.411
.996

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Onset Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh Anak

SD

Count

6.0

2.0

8.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

18.8%

18.2%

18.6%

% of Total

14.0%

4.7%

18.6%

3.0

1.0

4.0

12.5%

.0%

9.3%

Expected Count

SMP

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

110

% of Total
SMA

9.3%

.0%

9.3%

18

24

17.9

6.1

24.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

56.3%

54.5%

55.8%

% of Total

41.9%

14.0%

55.8%

5.2

1.8

7.0

12.5%

27.3%

16.3%

9.3%

7.0%

16.3%

32

11

43

11.0

43.0

Count
Expected Count

Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count

32.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

74.4%

25.6% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
2.478a
3
.479
Likelihood Ratio
3.352
3
.340
Linear-by-Linear Association
.710
1
.399
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.02.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24
Bulan
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh

SD-SMP

SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi

>24 Bulan

Total

Count

10

12

Expected Count

8.9

3.1

12.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

31.3%

18.2%

27.9%

% of Total

23.3%

4.7%

27.9%

22

31

23.1

7.9

31.0

68.8%

81.8%

72.1%

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

111

% of Total
Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

51.2%

20.9%

72.1%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

74.4%

25.6% 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.695a
1
.405
Continuity Correctionb
.197
1
.657
Likelihood Ratio
.738
1
.390
Fisher's Exact Test
.698
Linear-by-Linear
.679
1
.410
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.07.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.339

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Program Televisi yang ditonton


Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Pendidikan Terakhir SD
Pengasuh Anak

Count

Expected Count

.9

4.1

3.0

8.0

40.0%

22.7%

6.3%

18.6%

4.7%

11.6%

2.3%

18.6%

Count

Expected Count

.5

2.0

1.5

4.0

% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton

.0%

13.6%

6.3%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

10

11

24

2.8

12.3

8.9

24.0

60.0%

45.5%

68.8%

55.8%

7.0%

23.3%

25.6%

55.8%

% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total
SMP

SMA

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

Perguruan

Total

Count

112

Tinggi

Expected Count

Total

.8

3.6

2.6

7.0

% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton

.0%

18.2%

18.8%

16.3%

% of Total

.0%

9.3%

7.0%

16.3%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

100.0% 100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0%

37.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df

5.655a
7.027
3.172
43

6
6
1

.463
.318
.075

a. 10 cells (83.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .47.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton

12

1.4

6.1

4.5

12.0

40.0% 36.4%

12.5% 27.9%

4.7% 18.6%

4.7% 27.9%

14

14

31

3.6

15.9

11.5

31.0

60.0% 63.6%

87.5% 72.1%

7.0% 32.6%

32.6% 72.1%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

113

Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya Total
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang
ditonton
% of Total

12

1.4

6.1

4.5

12.0

40.0% 36.4%

12.5% 27.9%

4.7% 18.6%

4.7% 27.9%

14

14

31

3.6

15.9

11.5

31.0

60.0% 63.6%

87.5% 72.1%

7.0% 32.6%

32.6% 72.1%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

11.6% 51.2%

37.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
3.033a
2
.219
Likelihood Ratio
3.290
2
.193
Linear-by-Linear Association
2.516
1
.113
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.40.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.078

Positive

.078

Negative

.000
.229
1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh

114

Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh Anak * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua
/ Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir
Pengasuh Anak

SD

Count

1.1

6.9

8.0

16.7%

18.9%

18.6%

2.3%

16.3%

18.6%

Count

Expected Count

.6

3.4

4.0

% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh

.0%

10.8%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

9.3%

9.3%

20

24

3.3

20.7

24.0

66.7%

54.1%

55.8%

9.3%

46.5%

55.8%

1.0

6.0

7.0

16.7%

16.2%

16.3%

2.3%

14.0%

16.3%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
SMP

SMA

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Perguruan
Tinggi

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association

Total

.811a
1.357
.138

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
3
3
1

.847
.716
.710

115

N of Valid Cases
43
a. 5 cells (62.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is .56.
Pendidikan Terakhir Pengasuh * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh Crosstabulation
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi Didampingi
Pendidikan Terakhir SD-SMP
Pengasuh

Count

11

12

1.7

10.3

12.0

16.7%

29.7%

27.9%

2.3%

25.6%

27.9%

26

31

4.3

26.7

31.0

% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh

83.3%

70.3%

72.1%

% of Total

11.6%

60.5%

72.1%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
% of Total

SMA-Perguruan
Tinggi

Total

Total

Count
Expected Count

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan
Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
% of Total

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

14.0%

86.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.438a
1
.508
b
Continuity Correction
.029
1
.864
Likelihood Ratio
.478
1
.489
Fisher's Exact Test
.659
Linear-by-Linear
.428
1
.513
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.67.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.455

116

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga

10

Expected Count

.5

.9

.6

2.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

.0%

10.0%

.0%

4.7%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

.0%

4.7%

20

4.7

9.3

6.0

20.0

40.0%

45.0%

53.8%

46.5%

9.3%

20.9%

16.3%

46.5%

15

3.5

7.0

4.5

15.0

40.0%

35.0%

30.8%

34.9%

9.3%

16.3%

9.3%

34.9%

Count

Expected Count

.9

1.9

1.2

4.0

10.0%

5.0%

15.4%

9.3%

2.3%

2.3%

4.7%

9.3%

Count

Expected Count

.2

.5

.3

1.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

.0%

5.0%

.0%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

.0%

2.3%

Count

Expected Count

.2

.5

.3

1.0

10.0%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Count

% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
6

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Total

Total

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

>2 Jam

Count

Expected Count

1-2 Jam

Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

117

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Onset Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Onset Menonton Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga

10

Count

1.5

.5

2.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

6.3%

.0%

4.7%

% of Total

4.7%

.0%

4.7%

16

20

14.9

5.1

20.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

50.0%

36.4%

46.5%

% of Total

37.2%

9.3%

46.5%

11

15

11.2

3.8

15.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

34.4%

36.4%

34.9%

% of Total

25.6%

9.3%

34.9%

3.0

1.0

4.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

9.4%

9.1%

9.3%

% of Total

7.0%

2.3%

9.3%

Count

Expected Count

.7

.3

1.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

.0%

9.1%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

Count

Expected Count

.7

.3

1.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

.0%

9.1%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count

Count
Expected Count

Count
Expected Count

Count
Expected Count

Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

118

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Program Televisi yang ditonton


Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga

10

Count

Expected Count

.2

1.0

.7

2.0

% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

.0%

9.1%

.0%

4.7%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

.0%

4.7%

11

20

2.3

10.2

7.4

20.0

40.0%

50.0%

43.8%

46.5%

4.7%

25.6%

16.3%

46.5%

15

1.7

7.7

5.6

15.0

40.0%

31.8%

37.5%

34.9%

4.7%

16.3%

14.0%

34.9%

Count

Expected Count

.5

2.0

1.5

4.0

% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

.0%

9.1%

12.5%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

4.7%

9.3%

Count

Expected Count

.1

.5

.4

1.0

% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

.0%

.0%

6.3%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

Count

Expected Count

.1

.5

.4

1.0

20.0%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

.0%

.0%

2.3%

22

16

43

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total
Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

11.6%

51.2%

37.2%

100.0%

119

Jumlah Tanggungan Keluarga * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Jumlah Tanggungan
Keluarga

10

Expected Count

.3

1.7

2.0

% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh

.0%

5.4%

4.7%

% of Total

.0%

4.7%

4.7%

18

20

2.8

17.2

20.0

33.3%

48.6%

46.5%

4.7%

41.9%

46.5%

12

15

2.1

12.9

15.0

50.0%

32.4%

34.9%

7.0%

27.9%

34.9%

Count

Expected Count

.6

3.4

4.0

% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh

.0%

10.8%

9.3%

% of Total

.0%

9.3%

9.3%

Count

Expected Count

.1

.9

1.0

16.7%

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

.0%

2.3%

Count

Expected Count

.1

.9

1.0

% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh

.0%

2.7%

2.3%

% of Total

.0%

2.3%

2.3%

Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
7

Total

Total

Count

Expected Count

Didampingi

Count
Expected Count
% within Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

120

Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah

1 buah

Count

Total

14

30

7.0

14.0

9.1

30.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

90.0%

70.0%

53.8%

69.8%

% of Total

20.9%

32.6%

16.3%

69.8%

13

3.0

6.0

3.9

13.0

10.0%

30.0%

46.2%

30.2%

2.3%

14.0%

14.0%

30.2%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

30.2%

100.0%

> 1buah Count


Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total

23.3%

46.5%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
3.504a
2
.173
Likelihood Ratio
3.822
2
.148
Linear-by-Linear Association
3.404
1
.065
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 3.02.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

>2 Jam

Expected Count

Total

1-2 Jam

Absolute

.228

Positive

.228

Negative

.000
.687
.732

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah

121

Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Onset Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah

1 buah

Count

21

30

22.3

7.7

30.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

65.6%

81.8%

69.8%

% of Total

48.8%

20.9%

69.8%

11

13

9.7

3.3

13.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

34.4%

18.2%

30.2%

% of Total

25.6%

4.7%

30.2%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count

> 1buah Count


Expected Count

Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
1.018a
1
.313
b
Continuity Correction
.395
1
.530
Likelihood Ratio
1.088
1
.297
Fisher's Exact Test
.456
Linear-by-Linear
.994
1
.319
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.271

Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Program Televisi yang ditonton


Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah

1 buah

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

Total

15

10

30

3.5

15.3

11.2

30.0

100.0%

68.2%

62.5%

69.8%

122

% of Total

11.6%

34.9%

23.3%

69.8%

13

1.5

6.7

4.8

13.0

% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

.0%

31.8%

37.5%

30.2%

% of Total

.0%

16.3%

14.0%

30.2%

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

> 1buah Count


Expected Count

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

100.0% 100.0%
11.6%

51.2%

100.0% 100.0%
37.2% 100.0%

Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test


Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.167

Positive

.167

Negative

.000
.502
.963

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Jumlah Televisi di Rumah
Jumlah Televisi di Rumah * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh
Crosstab

Pendampingan Orang Tua /


Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Jumlah Televisi di
Rumah

1 buah

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

> 1buah Count


Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Total

Count
Expected Count

Didampingi

Total

27

30

4.2

25.8

30.0

50.0%

73.0%

69.8%

7.0%

62.8%

69.8%

10

13

1.8

11.2

13.0

50.0%

27.0%

30.2%

7.0%

23.3%

30.2%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

123

% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
1.292a
1
.256
Continuity Correctionb
.432
1
.511
Likelihood Ratio
1.204
1
.273
Fisher's Exact Test
.345
Linear-by-Linear
1.262
1
.261
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.248

Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Durasi Menonton Televisi


Crosstab
Durasi Menonton Televisi
<1 Jam
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur

Tidak
Ada

Count

27

6.3

12.6

8.2

27.0

% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi

70.0%

55.0%

69.2%

62.8%

% of Total

16.3%

25.6%

20.9%

62.8%

16

3.7

7.4

4.8

16.0

30.0%

45.0%

30.8%

37.2%

7.0%

20.9%

9.3%

37.2%

10

20

13

43

10.0

20.0

13.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

23.3%

46.5%

30.2%

100.0%

Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Durasi
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association

Total

11

Count

Total

>2 Jam

Expected Count

Ada

1-2 Jam

.973a
.974
.002

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
2
2
1

.615
.614
.960

124

N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 3.72.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Durasi Menonton
Televisi
Most Extreme Differences

Absolute

.083

Positive

.072

Negative

-.083
.264
1.000

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Onset Menonton Televisi
Crosstab

Onset Menonton
Televisi
0-24 Bulan >24 Bulan
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur

Tidak Ada Count

20

27

20.1

6.9

27.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

62.5%

63.6%

62.8%

% of Total

46.5%

16.3%

62.8%

12

16

11.9

4.1

16.0

% within Onset
Menonton Televisi

37.5%

36.4%

37.2%

% of Total

27.9%

9.3%

37.2%

32

11

43

32.0

11.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

74.4%

25.6%

100.0%

Expected Count

Ada

Count
Expected Count

Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Onset
Menonton Televisi
% of Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value

Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test

.005a
.000
.005

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

df
1
1
1

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

.946
1.000
.946
1.000

.621

125

Linear-by-Linear
.004
1
.947
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.09.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Program Televisi yang ditonton
Crosstab
Program Televisi yang
ditonton
Edukasi Hiburan Keduanya
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur

Tidak
Ada

Count

10

12

27

3.1

13.8

10.0

27.0

100.0%

45.5%

75.0%

62.8%

11.6%

23.3%

27.9%

62.8%

12

16

1.9

8.2

6.0

16.0

% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

.0%

54.5%

25.0%

37.2%

% of Total

.0%

27.9%

9.3%

37.2%

Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton
% of Total

Ada

Count
Expected Count

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within Program
Televisi yang ditonton

22

16

43

5.0

22.0

16.0

43.0

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total

11.6%

51.2%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases

6.814a
8.454
.002
43

Asymp. Sig. (2sided)

df
2
2
1

.033
.015
.964

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 1.86.
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Test Statisticsa
Program Televisi
yang ditonton
Most Extreme Differences

Total

Absolute

.194

Positive

.185

Negative

-.194

100.0% 100.0%
37.2% 100.0%

126

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Grouping Variable: Televisi di Kamar Tidur

.616
.842

Televisi di Kamar Tidur * Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh


Crosstab
Pendampingan Orang Tua /
Pengasuh
Tidak
Didampingi
Televisi di Kamar
Tidur

Tidak Ada Count


Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total
Ada

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Total

Count
Expected Count
% within
Pendampingan Orang
Tua / Pengasuh
% of Total

Didampingi

Total

23

27

3.8

23.2

27.0

66.7%

62.2%

62.8%

9.3%

53.5%

62.8%

14

16

2.2

13.8

16.0

33.3%

37.8%

37.2%

4.7%

32.6%

37.2%

37

43

6.0

37.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

14.0%

86.0%

100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
.045a
1
.832
b
Continuity Correction
.000
1
1.000
Likelihood Ratio
.045
1
.831
Fisher's Exact Test
1.000
Linear-by-Linear
.044
1
.834
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.23.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.606

127

Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale


Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale
Frequency
Valid

Percent

Cumulative
Percent

Valid Percent

Normal

30

69.8

69.8

69.8

Suspek Terlambat Bicara

13

30.2

30.2

100.0

Total

43

100.0

100.0

Durasi Menonton Televisi * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale


Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara
Durasi Menonton
Televisi

>2 jam per hari

Total

Count

12

13

Expected Count

3.9

9.1

13.0

% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale

92.3%

3.3% 30.2%

% of Total

27.9%

2.3% 30.2%

<1 jam dan 1-2 jam Count


per hari
Expected Count

Total

Normal

29

30

9.1

20.9

30.0

% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale

7.7%

96.7% 69.8%

% of Total

2.3%

67.4% 69.8%

Count
Expected Count
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
% of Total

13

30

43

13.0

30.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases

34.041a
29.953
36.883

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

df
1
1
1

.000
.000
.000
.000

33.249
43

.000

.000

128

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.93.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Durasi
Menonton Televisi (>2 jam
per hari / <1 jam dan 1-2 jam
per hari)
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

348.000

20.084

6029.883

27.692

4.006

191.436

.080

.012

.524

43

Onset Menonton Televisi * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale


Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara
Onset Menonton
Televisi

0-24 Bulan Count

Total

13

19

32

9.7

22.3

32.0

100.0%

63.3%

74.4%

30.2%

44.2%

74.4%

11

11

3.3

7.7

11.0

% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale

.0%

36.7%

25.6%

% of Total

.0%

25.6%

25.6%

Expected Count
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
% of Total
>24 Bulan Count
Expected Count

Total

Normal

Count
Expected Count
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
% of Total

13

30

43

13.0

30.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb

6.405a
4.624

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

df
1
1

.011
.032

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

129

Likelihood Ratio
9.473
1
.002
Fisher's Exact Test
.019
Linear-by-Linear
6.256
1
.012
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.009

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases

Lower

.594

Upper

.446

.791

43

Program Televisi yang ditonton * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale


Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara
Program Televisi
yang ditonton

Hiburan dan
Keduanya

Edukasi

Count
Expected Count

Total

10

28

38

11.5

26.5

38.0

% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale

76.9%

93.3% 88.4%

% of Total

23.3%

65.1% 88.4%

Count
Expected Count
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
% of Total

Total

Normal

Count
Expected Count
% within
Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale
% of Total

1.5

3.5

5.0

23.1%

6.7% 11.6%

7.0%

4.7% 11.6%

13

30

43

13.0

30.0

43.0

100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square

2.377a

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

df
1

.123

130

Continuity Correctionb
1.048
1
.306
Likelihood Ratio
2.171
1
.141
Fisher's Exact Test
.153
Linear-by-Linear
2.322
1
.128
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.51.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

.153

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Program
Televisi yang ditonton
(Hiburan dan Keduanya /
Edukasi)
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

.238

.035

1.639

.439

.180

1.070

1.842

.619

5.480

43

Pendampingan Orang Tua / Pengasuh * Interpretasi Nilai Capute Scale


Crosstab
Interpretasi Nilai Capute
Scale
Suspek
Keterlambatan
Bicara
Pendampingan Orang Tidak
Tua / Pengasuh
Didampingi

Count

1.8

4.2

6.0

23.1%

10.0%

14.0%

7.0%

7.0%

14.0%

10

27

37

11.2

25.8

37.0

% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale

76.9%

90.0%

86.0%

% of Total

23.3%

62.8%

86.0%

13

30

43

30.0

43.0

Expected Count

% of Total
Count
Expected Count

Total

Total

% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
Didampingi

Normal

Count
Expected Count
% within Interpretasi
Nilai Capute Scale
% of Total

13.0
100.0%

100.0% 100.0%

30.2%

69.8% 100.0%

131

Chi-Square Tests
Value

df

Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2sided)

Exact Sig. (1sided)

Pearson Chi-Square
1.292a
1
.256
Continuity Correctionb
.432
1
.511
Likelihood Ratio
1.204
1
.273
Fisher's Exact Test
.345
Linear-by-Linear
1.262
1
.261
Association
N of Valid Cases
43
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.81.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Pendampingan
Orang Tua / Pengasuh (Tidak
Didampingi / Didampingi)
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Suspek
Keterlambatan Bicara
For cohort Interpretasi Nilai
Capute Scale = Normal
N of Valid Cases

Lower

Upper

2.700

.466

15.648

1.850

.709

4.829

.685

.301

1.562

43

.248

132

Lampiran 7. Kuesioner pola menonton televisi


DATA KARAKTERISTIK SUBJEK
No. Urut
: ________ (diisi oleh peneliti)
Nama orangtua
: ______________________________________________
Jenis kelamin
:
Laki-laki
Perempuan
Nama anak
: ______________________________________________
Jenis kelamin
:
Laki-laki
Perempuan
Tanggal lahir
: Tanggal ________ Bulan ________ Tahun ___________
Usia kehamilan saat melahirkan
: ________________ minggu
Berat badan lahir
: ________________ gram
Berat badan
: ________________ kg (diisi peneliti)
Tinggi / panjang badan
: ________________ cm (diisi peneliti)
Status gizi
: ________________ (diisi peneliti)
Hasil pemeriksaan Capute scales : ________________ (diisi peneliti)
Riwayat gangguan perkembangan
Jika Ya, sebutkan

:
Ya
Tidak
: ____________________________
: ____________________________
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak
:
Ya
Tidak

Riwayat cacat bawaan


Riwayat kelainan saraf
Riwayat gangguan pendengaran
Riwayat cedera kepala / gegar otak
Riwayat opname (rawat inap)
Jika Ya :
Lama dirawat
: ____________________________
Sebab dirawat
: ____________________________
Diagnosa (informasi dari tenaga kesehatan) : ____________________________
Riwayat panas tinggi dan kejang
: ____________________________
Riwayat menderita penyakit lain (sebutkan)
: ______________________
Riwayat lamanya menderita sakit :
< 1 bulan
1-3 bulan
> 3 bulan
Apakah anak mempunyai saudara kembar :
Ya
Tidak
Jika Ya , Nama saudara kembaran
: ____________________________
Hasil pemeriksaan Capute scales :_________________(diisi peneliti)
Bahasa yang digunakan orang tua untuk berbicara dengan anak (tuliskan)
:_______________________
Bahasa yang digunakan pengasuh di TPA/PAUD untuk berbicara dengan anak
:_______________________

133

Pendidikan terakhir ayah* : Tidak sekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3


Pendidikan terakhir ibu* : Tidak sekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3
Pekerjaan ayah
: _________________________
Pekerjaan ibu
: _________________________
Pekerjaan anggota keluarga lain (bila ada)** : _________________________
Pendapatan ayah :
Pendapatan ibu :
a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan
a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan
b. Rp 1.000.000 3.000.000 / bulan
b. Rp 1.000.000 3.000.000 / bulan
c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan
c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan

Pendapatan anggota keluarga lain (bila ada): a. < Rp 1.000.000 / bulan


b. Rp 1.000.000-3.000.000 / bulan
c. > Rp 3.000.000 / bulan
Jumlah tanggungan***

: __________________ orang

Pengasuh anak selain ayah dan ibu*

: a. Pembantu/pengasuh/babysitter
b. Kakek/nenek/bibi/paman
c. Tetangga/orang lain

Pendidikan terakhir pengasuh*:Tidaksekolah/SD/SMP/SMA/Diploma/S1/S2/S3


Biasanya anak diantar pada pukul ___ dan dijemput pada pukul ____ dari
TPA/PAUD
Anak
berada
di
TPA/PAUD
pada
hari*:
Senin/Selasa/Rabu/Kamis/Jumat/Sabtu/minggu
Alamat rumah
No. telp rumah
No. HP
Alamat tempat kerja
No. telp tempat kerja

: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________
: _________________________________________

Keterangan:
*lingkari yang benar
**anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah selain bapak dan ibu
***jumlah tanggungan adalah jumlah seluruh anggota keluarga yang tinggal serumah

134

KUISIONER PENELITIAN
HUBUNGAN POLA MENONTON TELEVISI DENGAN
KETERLAMBATAN BICARA
Studi pada Anak Usia 1-3 Tahun di Semarang
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
Nama anak : ___________________________________________________
TPA/PAUD : ___________________________________________________
Nama pengisi : ___________________________________________________

Jumlah televisi dalam rumah : _____


buah
a. 1 buah
b. 2 buah
Apakah terdapat televisi dalam kamar
tempat anak tidur?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Berapa lama anak menonton televisi
dalam satu hari pada hari sekolah?
a. < 1 jam
b. 1-2 jam
c. > 2 jam
Berapa lama anak menonton televisi
dalam satu hari pada hari libur?
a. < 1 jam
b. 1-2 jam
c. > 2 jam
Apakah anak selalu didampingi ketika
menonton televisi?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Usia pertama kali anak mulai menonton
televisi :
a. 0-24 bulan

b. > 24 bulan
Jika ya, dengan siapa anak paling sering
didampingi saat menonton televisi?
a. Orang tua
b. Pengasuh/pembantu/baby sitter
c. Kakek/nenek/paman/bibi
Apa yang dilakukan pendamping/
pengasuh saat anak menonton televisi?
a. Menemani tanpa berinteraksi
dengan anak (hanya menonton
atau
sambil
mengerjakan
pekerjaan lain)
b. Menyuapi anak
c. Berinteraksi
dengan
anak
(mengajak
anak
berbicara,
menjelaskan,
memilihkan
program dan bercerita tentang
program yang ditonton anak)
Acara televisi yang paling disukai anak :
a. Kesenian (musik, tarian,gambar)
b. Olahraga
c. Flora fauna
d. Sinetron
e. Kartun (sebutkan) _________
f. Kuis
g. Pendidikan
h. Lain-lain (sebutkan)________

135

BUKU HARIAN ANAK 1X24 JAM PADA HARI SEKOLAH


Hari, tanggal
Nama anak
TPA/PAUD
Nama pengisi

: __________
: _____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________

Waktu
(Jam : Menit)

Kegiatan Anak

Didampingi

Keterangan

Oleh

(jenis/judul tontonan)

Keterangan :
Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak
pada saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman /
bibi / teman / pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan
jenis/judul tayangan yang ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi .

136

BUKU HARIAN ANAK 1X24 JAM PADA HARI LIBUR


Hari, tanggal
Nama anak
TPA/PAUD
Nama pengisi
Waktu
(Jam : Menit)

: __________
: ____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________
: _____________________________________________________
Kegiatan Anak

Didampingi

Keterangan

Oleh

(jenis/judul tontonan)

Keterangan :
Kolom didampingi oleh / bersama siapa diisi dengan siapa yang ada di dekat anak pada
saat kegiatan berlangsung (ayah / ibu / kakak / adik / nenek / kakek / paman / bibi / teman
/ pengasuh / sendiri). Kolom keterangan bisa ditulis dengan jenis/judul tayangan yang
ditonton anak jika anak menonton televisi.

137

DATA KARAKTERISTIK TPA / PAUD


No. Urut
Nama TPA / PAUD
Alamat

Nama Kepala Sekolah


Nama Guru / Pengasuh

Nama pengisi

: ________ (diisi oleh peneliti)


: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________
: _______________________________________

Jumlah televisi di TPA / PAUD : _____


a. 1 buah
b. 2 buah
Apakah terdapat televisi dalam kamar
tempat anak tidur?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
Berapa lama televisi dinyalakan dalam
satu hari?
a. < 1 jam
b. 1-2 jam
c. > 2 jam
Usia pertama kali anak mulai menonton
televisi :
a. 0-24 bulan
b. > 24 bulan
Apakah anak selalu didampingi ketika
menonton televisi?
a. Ya
b. Tidak

Apa yang dilakukan pendamping/


pengasuh saat anak menonton televisi?
a. Menemani tanpa berinteraksi
dengan anak (hanya menonton
atau
sambil
mengerjakan
pekerjaan lain)
b. Menyuapi anak
c. Berinteraksi
dengan
anak
(mengajak
anak
berbicara,
menjelaskan,
memilihkan
program dan bercerita tentang
isi program yang ditonton anak
Acara televisi yang paling disukai anak :
a. Kesenian
(musik,
tarian,
gambar)
b. Olahraga
c. Flora fauna
d. Sinetron
e. Kartun (sebutkan) ___________
f. Kuis
g. Pendidikan
h. Lain-lain (sebutkan) _________

138

Lampiran 8. Capute scales scoring sheet

139

140

141

142

Lampiran 9. Dokumentasi penelitian

143

144

Lampiran 10. Biodata mahasiswa


Identitas
Nama

: Ani Safitri

NIM

: G2A009074

Tempat/tanggal lahir : Gogodalem Semarang, 7 November 1990


Jenis kelamin

: Perempuan

Alamat

: Dusun Mulya Jaya RT 005 RW 003


Desa Sei Bawang Kec. Singingi Kab. Kuantan Singing

Riau
Nomor Telepon

: -

Nomor HP

: 085641196888

e-mail

: dranisafitri074@yahoo.co.id

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal


1. SD

: SD Negeri 030 Singingi

Lulus tahun: 2002

2. SMP

: SMP Negeri 1 Kuantan Singingi

Lulus tahun: 2005

3. SMA

: SMA Negeri 1 Kuantan Singingi

Lulus tahun: 2008

4. FK UNDIP

: Masuk tahun : 2009

Keanggotaan Organisasi
1. (Belum ada)

Pengalaman penelitian
1. (Belum ada)

Pengalaman publikasi tulisan ilmiah


1. (Belum ada)

145

Pengalaman presentasi karya ilmiah


1. (Belum ada)

Pengalaman mengikuti lomba karya ilmiah


1. (Belum ada)

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen