Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Service Zone
Suspended Ceiling
Short Span
Raised Floor
Service Zone
Suspended Ceiling
Raised Floor
Reducing Environmental
Impact of Construction
Clear Span
Fig. 1. Integrating services allows longer spans without increasing construction depth.
(High aspect ratio rectangular ducting is replaced by highly efficient circular ducts)
Structure
The effect of using a long span office layout in
comparison to a short span one is dramatic. A
single span of 18 metre layout offers a
dramatic saving over a two bay 9m grid. A
typical 9 m grid contains nine beams, whilst
the clear span equivalent contains only five
beams. This is a 44% reduction in beams,
without considering the reduction in columns.
The work of a fabricator is all in the
connections, cutting to length, notching,
drilling, punching and welding of end plates
and fittings, with multiple handling of each
element through from stockyard to painting
and delivery. Every part of the frame
construction process is significantly reduced
by going clear span. With 44% fewer beams
there is a matching reduction in energy
expended on fabrication.
Erection time is not governed by the member
length, but the time needed to pick, swing and
temporarily bolt each member into place. A
clear span layout will be erected in half the
time of a short span arrangement (fig. 2).
The number of foundations will also be
reduced and this can have striking benefits on
sites with contaminated or poor g round
conditions. With low-rise buildings it is often
possible to remove the internal twin pile caps
and span to the outer piles, without changing
the size of the remaining piles. This offers
significant environmental savings both
FEATURE
500 Dia
500x400
600x350
900x250
Area m2
0.196
0.2
0.21
0.225
Perimeter mm
1570
1800 +14%
1900 +21%
2050 +30%
Guage mm
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.0 + stiffeners
Weight kg/m
9.9
11.3 +14%
14.9 +50%
16* +60%
Hanger spacing m
One every 3m
Two every 3m
Two every 3m
Two every 3m
Servicing
Changing from rectangular to circular ducting
offers a number of benefits. It reduces the
volume of materials consumed and more than
halves the installation time. Circular ducting is
more rigid, allowing the use of thinner gauge
material. The circular ducting also allows
higher flow rates without inducing noise borne
pollution from drumming.
Replacing a 600 x 350 mm duct with a 500 mm
circular one saves nearly 33% in duct material.
This ignores the additional savings from
production wastage, as circular ducts are
usually made from continuous strip spiral
wound with minimal waste, whilst fabricated
rectangular ducts are cut and bent from flat
sheets with higher wastage levels (table 1).
Installation time is more than halved, as only a
single drop rod is needed rather than double
hangers for rectangular ducts. Circular ducts
with push fit seals guarante e minimum
leakage and they can be installed in a fraction
of the time taken to apply sealant or tighten
multiple bolt flanges on rectangular ducts.
(When access is limited, sealing is never
adequately completed) See references [3] and
[4] for detailed savings.
Reducing Environmental
Impact of Maintenance
Air Tightness
A European Commission funded report on
energy conservation in buildings [3] addressed
the significant losses caused by air leakage
from ducting. Quality circular ducting is
manufactured complete with push fit seals
usually guaranteed to category D. The Report
concluded, The order of magnitude of energy
savings that can be achieved by using air-tight
ductwork in Europe is probably in the region
of 1 to 10 TWh/year. (p. 105). Field tests in
Belgium showed how dependant rectangular
ducts are on installation quality controls, when
compared to push fit circular ducting (table 2).
700
Rectangular Initial
Rectangular Final
Circular
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Rectangular Initial Rectangular Final
Circular
Table 2. Impact of replacing rectangular ductwork with circular in a Belgian office building
(Initial leakage of rectangular took many person-hours to reduce to final leakage hours, but
circular push fit ducts required no supplementary work to outperform rectangular.) [ref. 3] (p. 78)
FEATURE
10000
H&V
Lighting
Other
Structure
8000
6000
4000
2000
Avoiding Demolition
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Years
140
H&V
Lighting
Other
Structure
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
10
20
30
40
Years
50
60
References
1 Mckenna, P.D. & Lawson, R.M. (P166) Design of
Steel Framed Buildings for Service Integration.
Published by The Steel Construction Institute,
sponsored by UK Department of the
Environment, Transport and the Regions.
2 Eaton, K.J. & Amato, A. (P182) A Comparative
Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Modern
Office Buildings. Published by The Steel
Construction Institute.
3 Carri, F.R, Andersson, J , Wouter, P., Improving
ductwork. A time for tighter air distribution
systems. European Commission Directorate
General XVII for Energy group Energy
Conservation in Buildings and Commercial
Systems Program report.