Rubric

Nursing Leadership and Management Project Paper (1)

Nursing Leadership and Management Project Paper (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Project description and rationale

(Why is this a Relationship-based
Care Project?).

Project presented
clearly with solid
articulation of the
projects link to RBC
concepts.
8 pts

Literature Review

Excellent literature review

with clear support for the
RBC project.
8 pts

In-depth literature review

with good support for the
RBC project.
6 pts

Project Implementation Plan

Points are an accurate

description, relevant to
the plan and based in
RBC.
8 pts

Covers essential points but

lacks adequate description of
the project and not based in
RBC.
6 pts

References

Sources are current and

from peer reviewed
journals or texts.
8 pts

Grammar/Content/Organization

No grammatical errors,
information presented in
logical sequence, content is
easy to read and understand,
good word choice.
8 pts

Description of criterion

No APA errors.
8 pts

Some errors in project

research and
implementation. Project
clearly relates to RBC
concepts.
6 pts

Most sources are from

current or from peer
reviewed articles.
6 pts

a few APA errors

6 pts

Judy A. Scott, MSN, RN, Apr 21 at 8:53pm

Poor project description and

rationale. Project does not
clearly relate to the concepts
of Relationship-based Care
(RBC).
2 pts

Moderately in-depth literature

review with adequate support
for the RBC project.
4 pts
Essential points are not
emphasized or vague in
describing the project.
4 pts

Some current or peer

reviewed sources but relies
too heavily on other sources.
4 pts

Some grammatical errors,

some sequence problems,
word choice occasionally
repetitive or problematic.
6 pts

Total Points: 44
Well done, good project.

Basic understanding of the

project and RBC, but poorly
presented. The RBC concepts
do not adequately relate to the
project.
4 pts

Grammatical errors,
organization, or word
choice interfere with
readability.
4 pts

Some APA errors.

4 pts

No project
description
and rationale.
0 pts

Literature review is scanty

with little support for the
RBC project.
2 pts
Plan fails to provide for
adequate implementation
of the project.
2 pts

Plan not
Implemented
0 pts

Sources are questionable (not peer

reviewed literature, cannot be
verified or are out of date.
2 pts
Numerous grammatical
errors, organization
illogical, content is
difficult to follow or
understand.
2 pts

Multiple APA errors.

2 pts

No
literature
review
0 pts

No
references
0 pts

A multiplicity of
grammatical
errors, no
organization
0 pts

Did not follow APA format

0 pts

8 / 8 pts

6 / 8 pts

8 / 8 pts

8 / 8 pts

8 / 8 pts

6 / 8 pts