Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
F.
;ll}
JOINT
lV1
CTB CONTACTPOINT
@nd ?ESr
V.
october
1ee3
-.,noJit{S
U#O[D
,-4"1$r.ffiffiSnu""*
JOINT CONTACT POINT DIRE,CTORATE
U.
Gl.
s"
^u')
DISCLAIMER NOTICE
This document may contain
do not
pag.es wnlcn
vhich oo
reproduce legiblY.
Inconsistent page numbers
are due to omittance of blank
pages.
AD NO,
RDT&EPROIECT 1-M465?ISDO49
TBCOM PROIECT
DPCi REPORT
NO.
NO.
Prepared by
Don
T.
Parker
Andrew C. Parker
October 1993
:PPg1l ;,,I)_EEGTOBA, E
.JOhIT'GOtr\ITACT
U;s; aRlvtY DUcwev,inovntc Gnoullo:::
::
:,:,,
&CO-210{49-2r2
DPG/JCP.94/OO2
DISPOSITTON INSTRUCTIONS
Dcstroy this
For unclessificd tinitod documls, dcstrroy by my oothod thrt will prwcot diecloeirrc of contcots or
rcconstructio! of thc document.
.
Thp words 'he, him, his, etc.' ufien used in the documcot rprsent both the mrsculinc rnd femininc geoders
unlcss
othcnvi* speificelly
stetcd.
DISCLAIMEN, STATEMENT
Thc Joint CB Contect Point rnd Tcst @rojoct DO49) progrsm ie rn opcnrioudly oriontcd analysic/avaluation
rnd tcst pro8rrn md is oporatcd under tho gcaonl ovcrri3ht rnd guidancc of tbo Offico of the Socrotrry of
Ihfcore (OSD) rad coordinrtcd by lbc OfEcc of the Joint Strtr (J-5). It should bc undcrstood thrt thc findings,
conchuioor, rd rocon'ncadetionr prcscotcd in this DO49 dosuml rrc Dot to bc construcd es m officid
poeition of U.S. Army Dugwey Proving Ground, tho Tcct rnd Evrluation Comnaod, or tho Deprrtrcnt of tho
Army.
Form Approved
OMB No. 0704-0188
rtpffino budii td Ua colLEtim ol furrmads b rttnat- lo rfrae[ t lw pa. rqlcra, imluaiE tha tim td ?.Yiawiie irtt ucrid. xrch&! ariilire dttl louc6,
r:ha d.it r.d.d, fi cmCatir! rrrd rditwiE tlr coabsiion ol hl{madm. Sli CmmJltt taef,ditE tt*! brrd.n -timal. d $Y otltr rp.d ol rh.
O.rh.rir{ md m.im.idrE
Hichw.y, Srir. 12O4,
A.lirlrs, VA 22ZO2atO2,.t
rc
Dank)
ir
Otth. ol MmI.moa
lz. tltfoHl
uAlE
October
id
Eude.(,
Pprwrt i.dElin
lJ. rcruxl
1993- |
PtC.sr p7oa.Ol22l,
IYr
Wd*ErtL
D'C. 20603.
fechnical/Current
ullUINS
NUMECFD
B. AUTHOR(SI
UT t4111-3t35
for
U.S. Army Dugrvry Proving Ground, ATTN:STEDP-JCP
Salt I-rke City,
Dugwey, UT 84022-5000
,.sR trSOHIli6TMONrrC'HI[ti[6ENCYI,TAMEISI
DPG/JCP-94/002
O. SFONSOBING/MONIIOHING
AtrD ADORESS(ESt
1. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
DIsTRIBUTION/AVAILAEILITY
STATEMENT
The chemical warfare agents discussed in this book were developed prior to World War ll,
none
have been used in warfare by or against U.S. military forces. Because materials of
but
greater toxicity have been developed, thess agents have bssn considered obsolete. Defense
capability remains a possible requirement because of the ease with which some of these agents
can be produced and the low cost of production. These chemical warfare agents, if used at
deliverable rates in the field, would cause casualties with days to weeks of incapacitation, but
few deaths would result from such uss. All are capable of causing skin blisters, eye injuries
and, at high exposure levels, various physiological responses such as respiratory and intestinal
iniury.
5. NUMEEF OF
UNCLASSIFIED
OF TH]S PAGE
UNCLASSIFlED
54
PAGES
{crcluding Distribution)
OF ABTTRACT
UNCLASSIFlED
PrEib.a
2a&ro2
by
Arig srd.
23e.18
FORSWORI)
The Joint Chemicd/Biological (CB) Technical Data Source Book is organized as a series
of volumes, each addressing an identifiable area of information related to the andysis of CB
weaponri and defensive systems. Areas inelude chemical/biological agents, general models
weapons systems, chemical simulants, biological nonpathogens, and knowledge deficiencies.
This doorment, Volume V, Part 4 of the loint CB Technical Data Source Book is a
of blister agenti other than H, which was published as Volume V, Part 1. This
Source Book volume was prepared by Andrulis Research Corporation under contract No.
DAAD09-t7-D-000E. The au&ors would like to thank Kenneth S.K. Chinn for his
comprehensive review of ttris document.
discussion-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD
LIST OF TABLES AI{D FIGURES
...
1. INTRODUCTION
2. NITROOEN
2.1
MUSTARDS
3
3
2.3
2,4
SYMPTOMATOLOGY
2.2
MUSTARD
POISONINO
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
3.
MUSTARDS
TOXICITYOFNIIROGENMUSTARDS....
TIIERAPYANDPROPHYLNilS....
EMPLOYMENT ..
MECTIAMSM OF ACTION OF MIROGEN
.,....
.....,
SULFURMUSTARDS,TA}iIDA...
3.I CTIEMICAL COMPOSITION AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF T AND Q
3.2 CHEMICAL REAETIONS
3.3 PREPARATION OF T AND Q
3.4 SYMPTOMATOLOGY, PATHOLOGY, AND MECHANISM OF ACTION
PRODUCEDBYTANDA ...
3.5 TOXTCTTY OFT AI{D a . . .
3,6 TIIERAPY AND PROPHYI.AXIS . .
3.7 EMPLOYMENT . .
......
LEWISITE(L)AT.TDMUSTARD/LEWISTE6L)
4.I CIIEMICAL COMPOSIIION A}iID PI{YSICAL PROPERTIES
4.2 CTIEIUICAL REACTIONS OF LE\I'ISITE
4.3 PREPARATION OF AGEITIT
4.4 SYMPTOMATOLOGY, PATHOLOGY, AND MECHANISM OF ACTION . . . .
4.5 TOXTCITY
4.6 PROPHYI-AXIS A!.ID TIIERAPY
4.7 EMPI,OYMEM ..
CIIEMICAL AGEITI'TS
5.1 DE]ECTION
5.2 PT{YSICAL PROTECTION
5.3 DECONTAIUINATION
5. DEFENSE AGAINST
6.
ul
I7
2I
2I
2L
2I
25
25
27
27
29
29
29
32
13
36
3t
39
4T
4I
,,.,..
6.2
L4
18
4.
TI
...
42
47
47
47
Table
l.
2.
3.
4.
t2
l4
15
i.
li**Ifi *#fffiffifi;i,,
9. Toxicity of HN-l
....... .
......
l5
l5
......
16
'
10. Toxicity of HN-3 for Man
11. Estimated Dosages for Nitrogen Mustard and H to Produce Skin Damage
l6
16
on Human Forearm
12. Cutanous Injury in Masked Volunteers Exposed to HN-l and HN-3 Vapor
while Wearing Nonprotective Clothing
13. Chemicel Structure and Properties of T and Q
14. Physical Properties ofT and Q
15. Lethal Dosage of H, T, and Q for Various Animds
16. Effect of Chamber Airflow Rate on Lettrd Dosage for Vesicant Agents
to which Mice Are Exposed
17. RElative Vesication Resulting from H, T, or Q Deposited on Human Skin .
18. Chemical Structure and Properties of L and HL
19. Physical Properties of L end HL.
20. Sequentid Effect of One Drop of Liquid Lewisite or Sulfur Mustard on
the Skin of the Human Forearm
21. Toxicity of L for Animds when the Entire Body Is Exposed to Agent Vapor . . .
22. Toxicity of L for Animals when Exposed to Vapor
23. Toxicity to Animds of Percutenoous Application of Liquid L . . .
24. Toxicity of Lewisite for Man
L7
22
23
26
26
26
30
31
34
.
36
37
37
37
Flgure
l.
Transformations of Methyl-bis-(p-Chloroethyl)-amine
lv
(IIN-2) in Water
SECTION
1. INIRODUCTION
Chemical compounds that have been included or considered for inclusion in the U.S. arsenal of
chemical warfare (CW) blister agents are the sulfur mustards, the nitrogen mustards, the arsenicals, and
certain mixures of these agents. The sulfur mustards GI, HD, and THD), composed of the active
ingredient bis@-c.hloroethyl) sulfide, were presented in the lolnt QumicalBblogical Technical Data
Source Bo,ot (SB), Volume V, Part I @ef. t). This document, Volume V, Part 4 of the Sowce Book,
contains infonnation on other blister-qpe CW agents. Section 2 addresses thenirogen mustards; Section
3, sulphur mustards T and Q; and Section 4, arsenicals Lewisite and Lewisite/mustard mixture. Section
5 addresses defense againstthese CW agents, and Section 6 discusses agent disposal.
The CW agents discussed in this doctment were, for the most part, developed prior to the end
of World War II, though experimental evaluation of some continued for several years thereafter. These
agents were selected as the most appropriate for use as CW agents from among a large number of
compounds that were oraluated. There is no indication that any of the CW agents discussed wore ever
used in military conflict.
With ttre development of nerve agents, which are much more toxic ttran ury of the vesicurt agents,
interest in further development of vesicants declined. However, recent employment of sulfur mustard
(H or HD) by Iraq and Iran has renewed interest in vesicants, particularly interest in defense requirements
should these CW agents be used against U.S. forces in a limited conflict.
SEETION
2.
NITROGEN MUSTABDS
2.1
2.1.1
Introduction
In
HN-l:
S,
and
l.
The
mechloroethamine;
2.1.2
The chemicd struc$re and properties of HN-l, HN-2 and HN-3 are listed
physical properties of these agents are given in Table 2.
2.2
2.2.1
Reactions in Storage
in Table
agent.
Dimerization of HN-3 yields, as a first product, an N.N.N'.N'-terakis- (2-chloroethyl)-piperamnium dichloride. Other products result from storage in the presence of solvents or acids (Ref. 4).
D O C UM E N
Table
l.
Chenricel Neme
Bie{2-chlorocthyl)
o6yluinc
Ethylbis(2-chlorocthyl)
(Rcf.
mcthylaoiac
Bie-2(chlorocthyl)
(Rcf. 3)
(Rcf. 3)
3)
rnine
Ethyltie{p.oNoroc6yl)
mino
@cf. 3)
2,2'dic.hloro-N-rethyl
rmino (Rcf. 3)
diethyl-
N,N-bis(2-chlorocthyl)
ncthyl-
Cblonmino (Rcf.
Tri(2+hlorocthyleminc
(Rd.3)
rmina (Rcf. 3)
Gef a.)
Tri{2+hlorocthyl) rmine
3)
2,2',2'-trichloto-tricthyl
rmino (Rcf. 3, 5)
Tris(p.chlotoethyl) enino
@cf. a)
Morhyl-bis (p<hloroerhyl)
enine (Rcf. 4)
Mechlorethenine (Ref. 6)
Chenrical Stnrcture
cH2cH2c,
cIt2clt2c,
oror*t
t--l
HrC{
ll
cH2cll2cr
clllrCHzCl
cllzc[2eg
ClCH2CIl2-ll.
cII2cH2c,
Chqnical Formule
cJ{,rc?rN
C,IIrCf2I.I
cfl,2crrI{
156.07
20,.54
Moleuler lfleiqht
170.08
Rete of HvdrolYsis
Vcry slow
wetcr
Pnoducts of Hvdrolysis
Hydroxyl
dcrivetivcs
Hydrochloric rcid
Dimerizetion
Complex
condensete
Triethrn6ll6ia6
Direrizetion
co2,Hcr,cr} Hro' N,
(estimated) (Rof. 5)
Odor
Fishy or muty
Table
2.
HN-I
HN-2
HN.3
Liquid
oily Liquid
1.15 et 20"C
1.24 art25oC
Uquid
Dercitv
&iquid ft/mf)
1.09 et 25oC
-.
5.9
5.4
._
?.r
Boilins Point
(cdculetod)
at
stmofphcnc pressurE
194cC
75cC et 15 mm Hg.
2566C (crlculstGd)
ttEotphcnc prcssurc
150'C (Rcf. 5)
Freczinq Tenrperature
-34cC
{O to {5oC
Hish
High
-3.7"C
-4"C (rclting) (Ref. 5)
Ilash Foint
High
Viscositv
5.9 cSt
rt 25"C (Rcf.
5)
74 ctllg
78.8 cal/g
0.24 rrt25oC
0.29 at 20oC
1.25 et 40oC
0.0109 rt 25oC
0.0009
0.0106
0.0164
Solubilitl in Weter
lZ
Sparingly
Solubilitv in Solvenb
Freoly solublo in ecolone rnd
othcr organic rolvcnts
Volebilitv
orgrnic solvcnts
(ng/n)
127
tt -lOoC
rt OcC
1,52$.t 2OoC
3,1O0 rt 30"C
308
l-rom
3,5E0 rt 25oC
5,100 rt 30oC
10,q)O rt 40oC
13
et
OoC
l?l.t?5"C
ItO * 300c
390.t 40oC
120 rt 25oC (Ref. 5)
2.2.2
Hydrolysis
The nitrogen mustards ue slightly soluble in water and are very slowly hydrolped; HN-3 is the
least soluble. However, in water adjusted to pH t with bicarbonate, HN-l and HN-2 are rapidly soluble,
HN-3 somewhat less so. The hydrolysis products of HN-2 are shown in Figrre I (Ref. 4). The imonium
form and ehtorohydrin are soluble in water and are toxic. Only the product of the final stage of
hydrolysis, metryldiehanolamine, is nontoxic.
MI-2
cH2ol2cl
ll
,ll
r.mcrhyr.t{p<hrorocrhyr)
cthylcnirnoniumbn
cll
cH,N/
---r--_-
- *t'cxp'
-l
\-
Itf
r,
chtorohydrin. nrcthyt.p<hlorocrhyl- &rn-
phv&oxvc'lhvreminc
cH2cH2cl
A,?
cH3
cf{l
}\II2cH2oH
,ffi"'on'*
-'::
l.mcthyt-r{phydroxycrhyl) *riagfi
cthylcnimoniumbn
I ' : 'or/
i",
+N,ctI2CII2cl
Ar?
cry,clzor
^'?
T,
l-- T,
o(
II
g"ria-h,
"
I
|
+Ncl2crr2ct
{-*;",-"
-l*
-
glr,
-l l+/'c*zebor
cH3Y
I+
'
-'l-ctt2cH2oH
lornol2cH2ox
mcrhyrdicrlranotarnine
-\
cH2or2oH
-l
gIIz
I
CH.
l"
cI{3NcH2cHpH
Flgurc
l.
Concentrations of the end products of HN-2 hydrolysis have been shown to vary, depending on
the initial concentration of HN-2. lVith a low initial concentration of HN-2, the end product,
mahyldiahutolamine, prodominates; whereas, with higher initid HN-2 concentrations, thepiperazonium
derivatives will predominate as the dimerization products. Hydrolysis of HN-l and HN-3 is closely allied
to ttrat shown for HN-2. However, HN-l is less susceptible to dimerization; HN-3 yields three imonium
ions as compared to two with HN-l and HN-2 (Ref. 4).
In unbuffered water containing a small percenege of niEogen mustard, the nitrogen musBrd and
the hydrolys-is products can be found in solution concrrrently after 48 to 72 hours and presumably will
remain in such a state indefinitely. Water treated with t percent HN-2 and allowed to stand at room
temperature for 48 hours or longer had a neurotoxic effect on laboratory animals. The solubility and
toxicity of the hydrolysis products in water are conducive to the poisoning of food and water by thxe
CW agents.
2.2.3
-'
The reaction of principal interest is that of HN-3 and hydrochloric acid to yield tris-(2-chloroethyl)-ammonium chloride, a stable, water soluble compound that has the same toxicity as HN-3 and can
be stored indefinitely. As stated in paragraph 2.2,2,this makes it an effective poison for food and water.
A yellow crystalline picrate is formed when HN-3 reacts with picric acid. This reaction is used to
quantitatively identify HN-3 in solutions. Reaction with picrylsulfonic acid yields a more precise
quantitative assessment of dilute solutions (Ref. a). The HN-3 reacts with a number of other mineral
acids to yield toxic sals.
2,.2.4 Oxidation
The nitrogen mustards are not readily oxidized, and only powerful oxidizers are effective in
oxidizing these agens. Potassium pennanganate, dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid, slowly oxidizes
HN-3. Fuming nitric acid and chromosulfuric acid quickly react with HN-3 to form a number of
unidentified oxidation products. At elevated temperaturss the oxide of HN-3 is obtained through
oxidation by hydrogen peroxide (Ref. 7).
Chloride of lime and the chloramide.s commonly used as decontaminants for sulfur mustards either
do not oxidize or ineffectively oxidize the nitrogen mustards. However, several chloramides do react
effectively with nitrogen mustards, as does calcium hypochlorite. An excess of the reacting chlorine
compound is required to completely inactivate nitrogen mustard agents.
2.2.5
The nitrogen mustards react with a great number of chemical functional groups. However, the
reaction appears not to occur until thp tertiary amine has been transformed to the cyclic imonium form,
as occurs in the process of hydrolysis. The nitrogen mustards react with the amino group of almost all
amino acids and with organophosphate and sulftrydryl groups. They dso react with inorganic phosphates,
sulfides, polysulfides, and bisulfides (Ref. 7). Reactions occur more effectively at an alkaline pH.
The mustard agents inactivate or paftially inactivate a number of enzymu. The chloroethyl group
is the active alkylating component of both the sulfur and nitrogen mustard molecules. Consequently, the
action of nitrogen mustard should be expected to be similar to that of sulfur mustard. A degree of
similarity is demonstrated in the effect on enjzymes, as shown in Table 3.
Table
3.
iz Yirro.
.ffiffiffiiA-
Etzyr.
AA
2t40
Adcoylpymphoqhrtrro
Adcoylpyrophoephrtrsc (myosin)
Acrobic phoaphorylrse
Alcofol dchydr4coreo
d-Amino rcid oxidrso
Bctriac ddohl& oxidesc
2t{o
l)
up to
up to Z)
Crboryhsc
0
up to 20
0
Crtbcpsitr
Cholincstcnsc (scrum)
Cholincdcnsc Gnin)
Cbolinsstcnso (hdncy)
Cholinatcmr (cyc)
el-lod
Choliac oxi&gc
Chymprprin
2t{o
2t{o
up !o 20
zr{o
up to 20
91-r00
up to 20
9l-100
up !o 20
2r{o
2t40
61-90
up !o 20
up to 20
91-100
91-100
91-100
up !o 20
up to 2O
Chymtrypin
Crcrtino pborpbokinasc
Cytochrom oxi&ec
Dcutcrohcxokiorss
Glucoec dchydrqcorsc
91-100
0
61-90
0
2140
2t-60
up to 20
2140
2140
Glyccrolphoryho,kinrsc
alycorophoapbetc dchydrogcnrso
Glyordrsc
Hsxokinrsc
Histrninaso
Loucinc dc.Einrso
0
0
::
9l-100
2140
61-90
21{0
Prprin
up to 90
PGpsi!
Pcpsimsc (swinc kidncy)
2140
ztio
;
up !o 20
up to 20
up to 20
.rt1:
up to 20
2t40
Pcpsiaogen
Pyrwic oridrc
Srccinodchydrogmrsc
Srcrrsc
91-100
91-100
2140
up to 20
ttp to 20
up to 20
61-90
6r-90
2140
21.60
6140
2t-60
up to 20
21{o
u, a r?,
61-90
2140
up to 20
Ttymnrrclcodcpolymnse
Trioccphocphrto dchydrogmese
2t40
Tryprin
2140
::
2140
Uricrsc
VdiDe dcrnirrsc
'D& (!-Ctrlorcatryl) rulfrdc
rMahyl-Dir (P+hbroc*hyl) rminc
up to 20
up !o 20
ho
dete
NOTE: Studrrd brrtmcnt L conridcrcd to bc incubrtion with 3 millirnolcr of H or cqually rctivc rmounr of othcr
n9rtcnt for onc.halfto ons hour,
2.3
Ward (Ref. 2) reported pr@aration of the primary and secondary chloroahyl aglines (preparation
of both had been previously reported) and the tertiary chloro*hyl amines (preparation had not been
previously reportd). He reported the tertiary chloroahyl amines to have caused edema followed by
blisters on his hands, which required many weeks to fully heal. Tho primary and secondary chloroethyl
amines are not vesicants. IIe prepared ttre chloro*hyl amines by the reaction of thionylchloride in
chloroform on the corresponding ethanolamine.
Essentially the same procedure was used for plant production
compound of choice as a CIV agent. For HN-3, the reaction is:
2.4
The nitrogen mustards are vesicants urd produce erythema of the skin, followed by development
of skin lesions. The skin rash is violet in color (Ref. 7). The comparative vesicurcy of ttre three
nitrogen mustards and H are H > HN-3 > HN-2
HN-l. This order of vesicancy and lesion
production applies both to vapor and liquid exposure @ef. 4). The lesions caused by HN are reported
to be less deep and to heal more readily than those causod by H, but they are more painful. A rash may
appear within an hour following exposure to a high concentration of agent, but with exposure to what
>
may be mnsidued a field concentation the rash may not appear for 6
indicative of exposure to a subsuntial concenuation are accompanied by a deterioration in health and loss
of weight.
The upper and lower respiratory tracts are affected by respiratory exposure to HN vCIor or
aerosol. Mild intoxication causes catarrh in the larynx and other air passages. More severe exposure
can damage lung tissue, and the pulse and respiratory rate may increase. Muscle sparnu may accompany
injury to the central newous system, and the gastrointestind tract may be damaged (Ref.
HN-l
7).
No systemic
(Ref. 4).
The characteristics of niEogen mustard intoxication in animals, for each of the three niuogen
mustards, ue briefly presented in the following puagraphs.
2.4.L
HN-l in Animals
7.4.2
When HN-2 was administered to laboratory animds by parenterd i4jection, a cholinergic action
similar to Orat produced by acetylcholine was observed; however, inactivation of ctrolinesterase is
apparently not involved. The agent is responsible for a pardytic action in animals, affecting first the head
and neck and then the extremities and tho thorax. Cessation of respiration follows. Ras receiving HN-2
vapor
or
Events associated with administration of an LD, dose of HN-2 consisted of a symptomatic latent
period of I to 2 days; however, during ttris time, adverse respome and injury to various internal organs
was occurring, followed by anorexia, weight loss, diarrhea, prostration, ard death. Animds that survived
effects. Observations on the effect of HN-2 on
the LDr, for the most paf,t, did recover from
dl
hematopoiesis indicates early leucocytosis, followed after a day or rwo by leucopenia. This effect has
been observed with agent H.
Sensitization to HN-2 has been shown to develop in the animal body as a result
of
repeated
exposure to smdl liquid doses of the agent. Also, tolerance has been demonstrated following repeated
exposure to a series of small doses of agent administered over several months.
2.4.3
High subcutanous doses of HN-3 result in conwlsive action in various animals. Death is
attributed to respiratory failure presumably associated with restricted respiratory exchanges.
WiOr doses below the immediate conrnrlsive level, a progressive development of muscular
weakness, diarrhea, mldness, hyperexcitability, and retropulsive movements and tremors culminated in
prostration and death from respiratory failure. The general pathological course is lymphoid atrophy, bone
10
manow deterioration, and failure in blood cell generation; thus leucopenia, enteritis, and weight loss were
observed. As with the other nitrogen muserds and with agent H, some variation, though less so with
agent H, was obsewed for the different routes of agent entry into the urimal body.
2.4.4
Six human subjects, each at a termind stage of an incurable disease, responded to daily small
intravenous doses (0.1 mg/kg) of HN-3.HC| wittr nausea, vomiting, headache, malaise, drowsiness, and
marked reduction in blood cdls. In normd volurteers, a single dose of 0.1 mg/kg of HN-3'HCf caused
headactre and nausee 8ftr t hours. Dizziness and weakness dso occurred in some, and all volunteers
developed ttrrombophlebitis. No vomiting or anorexia occured.
Ingestion of 2 to 6 mg of HN-2.HC! in tap wuer resulted in anorexia, resurrent nausea and
vomiting, tenseness, gassiness, and mild diarrhea dong with depression. lngestion of I mg produced
very mild to zero symptoms and pathological murifestations. Severity increasod with inreased dosages.
Recovery was within 48 hours.
Inadvertent exposure !o HN-l and subsequent intoxisation in man caused laryngitis, bronchitis,
hoarseness, coughing, elevatod tmperafire, nsusea, and vomiting. Inadvertent exposure to minute
emounts of HN-l vapor caused conjunctivitis, asthrnafioid bronchitis, but m effect on temperature or
blood properties (Ref. 4). Two of six humans exposed acciden0y to HN-2 vapor complained of nausea
5 hours following exposure, and one vomited until 12 hours after exposure. Two showed a decline in
leucocyte count, but soon recovered (Ref. a). Persons accidently exposed to HN-3 vapor suffered eye
and upper respiratory tract irritation, headache, and vomiting (Ref. a).
2.4.5
Each of the three nitrogen mustards hydrolyzes to yield hydrolytic products, particularly the
imoniums and chlorohydrins as shown in Figure l. These are readily formed in water and in other
aqueous-based solutions. They have been examined as to toxicity, symptomatology, and pathology. In
general, they are equal in toxicity to the basic nirogen mustard compound and, with slight vuiation,
elicit the same symptoms and pathology as the corresponding niuogen mustard Eef. a).
2.5
2.5.1
Physiological Action
The action of vesicants involves penetration of at least the upper skin surface. Peneuation of the
skin by the mustard agents has been suggested to be related to fieir solubilities in lipids, a property of
both the sulfur and nitrogen mustards, which facilitate penetmtion through oil secretions around hair
follicles. However, penetration of skin ueas devoid of pors or hair follicles has been demonstrated (Ref
4). The rates of penetration of HN-l, HN-3, and H are given in Table 4.
1l
Table
4. Penetration of Human Forearm Skin by Saturated Vesicant Vapor in Exposure Cup (Ref. a).
Agcnt
Room
TGDPdrturE
HN.I
,
HN-3
(r)
Numbor of
Erperimmts
70:73
u4
60
E7
4t-49
49
7t-72
5GS2
t5-87
4749
72-73
t5
('F)
Pcoctrrtion
Rolrtivo
HuEidity
Voletilitf
(ne/f)
0.74
Rsto
fuglcm2/min)
1.4
2.7
t.$
l.t
56
3:3
5.1
45-48
t5
0.10
0.
474E
36
0.18
o.29
2.t
l8
'Cdcuhud on thc maraption rlut lha tor?cnurr of drc poeutioo eup ru thrt of tha mom.
The nitrogen mustards, like H, react immediately with animd tissue constituents, and their action
on the tissue is rapidly irreversible.
The view regarding the mechanism of action of niuogen mustard has evolved to the present from
the era of lYorld War l, when the furmation of hydrochloric acid by mustard vapor entering the body
was assumed to be responsible for toxicity. Little research was conducted between the hro world wars,
but during World War II extensive research demonstrated that alkylation of animal tissue constituents war
the action of the chloroatryl grcups of the mustsrd molecules. It was also observed that dkylation
the
ethylenesulfonium cations of nitrogen or sulfur mustard, respectively. It was recognized that ttrese cations
produced a qpe of action on cells unlike any other chemical agent, but not unlike the action of radiation
Eef. t).
It has been proposed (Ref. 9) that sulfur mustard forms the cyclic imonium ion, which reacts with
and dkylates electron-rich molecular structures such as sulftydryl and amino groups. Upon entering the
skin, the irnonium ion dkylates the purine bases, quinine and adenine of deoxyribonucleic acid @NA),
forming apurinic sites. These are acted on by apurinic endonucleases, leading to removal of the dkylated
bases and breaks in the DNA. The DNA repair requirement actiyates poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase,
which rapidly depletes cellular nicotinamide adenine nucleotide (NAD). This depl*ion, which begins
within ur hour of exposure to the chloroahyl imonium ion and reaches a marimum in about 4 hours,
inttibits glycolysis and releases cell proteases, which results in cell necrosis (Ref. 9). CIher mechanisms
of the action of sulfur mustard on animal tissue have been postulated (Ref. 10), based on some
experimental support. Because the alkylating moiety of the nitrogen mustards is the same as in sulfur
mustard (i.e, the chloroahyl group), it may be expected that ttre nitrogen and sulfur mustards have the
same mechurism of action.
In some research, differences between the action of sulfur and nitrogen mustards have been
observed. It was repofied in 1952 that HN-2 reacted with adenine, quinine, thymine, and uracil ln vitro
(R,ef. I l). A subsequent report, which discussed the action of a npre monofunctional sulfur mustard on
Tl bacteriophage, indicated that the sulfur mustard reacted with quinine and adenine bases of the virus
t?
DNA, whereas the niuogen mustard reacted only with the quinine base. The sulfur musurd inactivated
the vinrs, whereas the nitrogen mustard did not Eef. 12).
Depression
of tissue to HN-2
2.5.2
Chernotheraputic Action
Because the physiological effect
Many mmpounds conaining the two chloro*hyl alkylating $oups essential to tbe effective
antitumor activity related to HN-2 have been formulatcd. The first clinically effective ctremtherapeutic
agent was HN-2 (Ref. l5), and HN-2 and its derivatives such as phenylamine mustard (melpholan),
cyclophosphamide, and chlorambucil remain among the rnost effective chemotherapeutic agents (Ref. 16).
2.5.3
Aside ftom the uses of low doses of HN-2 in treating human cancer, extensive exposure of
to nitrogen mustard has not been reported, and a basis for evaluating the carcinogenicity of
nitrogen mustard is absent. The lesser reactivity of nitrogen mus&ud, as compared to sulfur mustard,
humans
13
may indicate a lower likelihood of a long-term effect. Invxtigations that have assessed the relationship
of cancer incidence to exposure to mustard, presumably sulfur musurd (Ref. l), indicate that short-term
exposure
relatively high concemations of sulfur mustard do not eppear to be responsible for an
increased incidence, at least not a suilisticaily significant increased incidence of cancer. In a population
of factory workers exposed to very low levels of sulfur mustard over a period of several yearc, a definite
link betryeen mustard exposure and various cancers, as well as other ailments, was indicated Eef. l).
An attempt was made in a rcccnt publication (Ref. 17) to litrk canc,er and serreral other ailmens
to exposure o possibly high, though sublethal, doses of mustard over a perid of a few days. The
assumptions made in that publication regarding carcinogenicity of mustard are questionable, Subsequent
to exposure to mustard, studied populations have had years of variod lifestyles, environmeotal exposures,
dias, and ocqrpstiorn as well as difrerent heteditary characteristics @ef.
These populations are
not easily amenable to ury definitive evduation that would support the conclusions of the referenced study
l0).
Eef. l7). A more realistic and supportable evaluation was prcsented in recoguizing that bronchitis
arising ftom prolonged exposure to mustard may predispose a person to have respiratory problems
including cancer of the respiratory system. However, an increase in the incidonce of cancer associated
with exposure to mustsrd at doseges to which populations have been exposed experimemally or in combat
has not been subst8ntiated as being statistically significant and must be viewed as negligible (Ref. l0).
2.6
For tho nitrogen mustards, most toxicity or dose response data for man and animds were obtained
during World War II, a period when an active search for effective CIV agents was pursued. All of the
data obtained were ftom laboraory work which was summarized in 1946 (Ref. 4). Values given in more
recent publications dmost always correspond to 0rose published in 1946. Howwer, rmre recent data for
HN-3 toxicity for laboratory animals have been included @ef. 5). The toxicity of the three nitrogen
mustards for laboratory animals is given in Tables 5 through E. Estimates of toxicity for man are in
Tables 9 through 12.
Table
5.
Animrl
Cutrnoous
Subcutrncou Intrrvenou
Iutreperiloncd
Orel
l3
R8t
t7
Rlbbit
l5
1.0
r.05
1.45
1.0
No &n.
t4
0.5
2.5
2.0
<3.0
6.
Table
Animal
Intrrvenous
Subcutraoous
Orsl
29-35
2.64.0
2.0
10-20
Rrt
t+an
1.9-2.O
1.1
ro-85
Rsbbit
L2-t7
3.0
1.6
t2-17.5
Guince Pig
>E
Do8
Gort
20
< 1.0
<lm
<50
Mootcy
'No
t2
&tr.
Table
?.
Aaimel
Cutaaoous
Subcuteaous latrevenous
Intnpcritoneol
Oral
7-10
2.M.9
l-2
7.0
2-5
2.O
o.7
4.9
5-19
2.5
r9
10
_t
< 1.0
t0
20
2G30
Do8
Goet
Guiaer Pic
5-20
20
2G.30
'No detr.
Table
8.
Aaimar
r,l{El5ll
Mousc
165{00
Ret
670-17fi
Guinee Pi3
l000-2300
Rsbbit
500.830
Clt
40G.1000
Do8
400-1500
Goet
500-1000
l5
Table
9.
Toxicity of
HN-l
and
L(Ctb (rng'urin/d)
HN.I
I{Ct)o (mg'min/m)
(ct)e
Pcrcutrnous
1,500
20,(no
9,000
2N
I(Ct), (mg'min/mt)
HN-2
Inhelation
,,:
-t
2,5q)-9,0O0
100
(mg'nin/m3)
'No detr.
Table 10.
*.uorroo"o ,r"
L(CQ5CF (mg'min/mr)
-a
LDse (mg&c)
I(C$str (mg'min/n)
200
**"rroo
,,:*
'3S*
1,500
10,000
0;
2,500
(meskd)
70 pg (to
42
E(Ct)sd (mg.min/m)
lc*hrl douge.
'Mcdirn
DMcdirn lcthrl dorc.
'Mcdirn incrpeciteting dongc.
Table 11.
ffi
'It{cdien
dete.
doragc
produce
'No
H to Produce Skin
Vapor Train
Agcot
Ervtheme
Blistcr
-CuP.
Tcst
VesicancY
(mg'min/m!)
<430
2,500
3,500
HN-I
2,7&
>21,000
18,(n0
HN.2
1,2@
5,800
HN.3
/100
1,800
TrIo dete.
16
3,7N
Table 12.
Number
of
Sovcrity of
Vrpor
Injurf
Conccotration
10
100
1.3
1.2
0.3
2@
1.4
1.4
300
300
3.3
4.6
0.6
t.2
t.7
2.2
4.0
0.3
0.6
0.6
1.8
o.5
o.2
3.0
4.0
2.0
1.9
0.8
50
100
150
150
0.2
6
6
r50
1.5
4.0
0.0
0.3
?50
2.5
1.5
350
4.9
?.6
I
8
E
1.9
1.8
No rcaction;
I:
3 = lntcorc crythcma; 4 =
2.7
of Body
450
760
HN.3
RGst
chambcr at
1.5
--
1.8
o.7
0.E
1.7
5 = Vcriclc
In general, therapy for intoxication by nitrogen mustard will be essentially the same as for sulfur
mustard intoxication. Protective measures, first aid, and therapy are described in U.S. Army Field
Manual 8-285 @ef. l8). The vesicant agent protective ointment M5, containing chloramide 5-330, is
applied for sulfur mustard exposure and should be used for eryrcsure in the field when identification of
the agent is not made immediately- However, chloramide 5-330 is relatively ineffective against the
nitrogen mustards.
First aid decontamination involves removal of evident droplas of liquid agent on skin or clothing
by lifting or blotting, followed by application of decontaminant pads urd powder. Treatment of skin
intoxication involves management of blistered areas. Blisters should be drained and areas protected
against infection. Infected areas may be treated wittr appropriate antibiotics. Dressings should be
changed every two to three days.
Liquid contamination in the eyes must be removed immediately, within seconds, by irrigating the
eyes with water from a canteen or other clean water supply. In a contaminated area, this should be done
while holding the breath between doffrng ard donning of the mask. Eye intoxication is treated with eye
ointments. Pain is alleviated witlr morphine or other systemic medication, AEopine drops may be
applied. A drop 0rree times daily witl aid in alleviating pain associated with swere photophobia and
blepharospasm. Sulfacgamide may be applied to control infection.
17
D O C U M E NT
U/VCLASS I F I E D U PO
espiraory involvement, in mild eases, is treated symptomatically o relieve cough and mild pain.
Antibiotic treatment is required if bron&opnaunonia dwelops. SubctUneous atropine injection may be
administered to relieve gastrointestinal distress caused by mustard intoxiceion. In sevcre gases, shock
therapy and administruion of electrolytes may be required. Atropine administration to allwiate the
conwlsions utd paralytic effects of nitogen mustard has been only slig[0y beneficid.
R
If exposure to mustard has been light, as widenced by mild symploms usually limited to
conjunctivitis and erythema, trestment may be limited to suppoftive serc. In such cias6, recovery will
be uneventful cnd complete in tsr,o to three weeks.
Experience witlt more severe cases of sulfur mustard intoxicuion has been obtained from
treatment of hospitdized Iran-Iraq war patients (Ref. 19, 20,21,22,23). In general, the treatment of
skin lesions was as for thermal burn victims; blisters were drained and moist occlusive bandages applied,
or the skin surface was left uncovered. Sulfadiazine and furacine were applied and, in swere cases,
cofticosteroid ointment was applied. Severe conjunctivitis was treatod with hydrocortisone ointment.
Extreme cases of @rnea injury were corrected by cornea fansplans. Systemic sy-trrptoms required
trestment with electrolyte therapy and parenteral fluids and blood ransfusion. Respiratory symptoms are
0te most life-threatening and have, in some cases, required tracheotomy. Therapetrtic bronchoscopy was
administered to clear air passages of some patients, and oxygen inhalation was required by some. There
is essentially no experience with treatment of cases of nitrogen mustard intoxication.
Some prophylactic research on the toxic effects
2.8
is
derivatives,
EMPLOYMENT
The nitrogen mustards were developed as replacements for H under specific conditions. Because
IIN-2 is unstable, it is no longer considered to be a suitable CIV agent. However, its use in the treatment
of some types of culcer has resulted in continued investigation of its properties.
r8
DOC U M E N7 U'VCLASS I F I E D U PO N
EP RO D U CT I O N JCP. I, DPG
During World War II, the Germans socked HN-3 as the chemicd component of high explosive
dremical artillery shells. Based on research during World \[ar II, both HN-3 and HN-l were viewed
as useful CW agents. These agenrc freeze at a much lower temperature &an H. Agent HN-l is more
volatile, while HN-3 is much less volatile than H. Agent HN-3 can be slored indefinitely without
appreciable loss of effectiveness, it is stable when disseminated by high explosive munitions, and is a
potcntial barrier agent. Of the vesicant mustard agents, HN-3 is the rnost toxic.
In field trids conducted to investigate the effectiveness of HN-l and HN-3, af,ea coverage dosage
Ievels attained.were somewhat less than those for agent H. Early tests indicated that the chloramideimpregnated U.S. &emical clothing, presumably impregnated with the chloramide 5-330, did not protect
tr@ps from the vapor of these CIY agents. These findings enhanced the expectation of their value as CW
agents. Subsequent testing showed that trro layers of clothing impreguated with another chloramide
designatcd CC-2 did protect against HN-3 but not HN-I. Charcod-impregnatod clothing did provide
protection against boft nitrogen mustards. Agent IIN-I is rolatively ineffective as a vesicant, and was
superceded by other materials.
In 1946,
as a result
of field trials and known proprties of HN-3, an effective use was proposed
(Ref, 4):
"It is believed that in high explosive bombardments an occasional high explosive chemical
shell charged with HN-3 and indistinguishable upon detonation from ordinary highexplosive would have been used. HN-3 possesses &e stability to withstand destnrction
during the explosion of the shell and the lack of odor to escape ready detection except by
chemical methods. It is believed that the potential harassing and casualty-producing
effects of the vapor slowly evolved from the contaminated terrain might exceod those of
the initid cloud. The duration of danger from the vapor, the time inte,rvals required for
the ovolution of casualty-producing dosages, and the areas over which effests would be
produced would depend on meteorologicd conditions. As an example of the order of
magnitude of the hazafi
- in warm weather, explosion of a single M47A2 bomb
(containing 67 pounds of HN3) resulted within 4 hours in the attaining of a dosago of 100
mg'min/m3 of vapor over approximately one-half of an artillery square, and of
250 mg'min/mt over about one-fuurth of an artillery square. A dosage of 250 mg.min/m3
should more than suffrce to produce totd disability of severd days' duration due to eye
injuries, and possibly severe respiraory injury as well.'
With 0re development of the more oxic and persistent agent VX, the military vdue of HN-3 was
overshadowed. But the favorable properties of HN-3, as stated above, and the ease of its preparation may
still make HN-3 a CW agent useful to a nation seeking an unsophisticatod CW capability.
l9
SECTION
3. STJLFUN,
MUSTARDS. T AND O
3.1
3.1.1
lntroduction
The sulfur mustard compound designated as Q was described in 1921 afr 1922 (Ref. 26) as
by the action of thionylchloride on the hydroxy compound corresponding to 1,2 bis-(Bchloroethylthio)ahane (Q). In 1931, it was reported (Ref. 27) that the incompl*e chlorination of
thiodiglycol, induced by modification of the thiodiglycol process for the preparation of H, resulted in the
production of a mixnre of H and T along with a smdl anount of Q and some impurities. Interest in T
and Q was a consequence ofthe fact that ttreir toxicities are higher and their persistencies are greater than
synthesized
those of H.
Agent
sesquiyperite.
3.1.2
3.2
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
Agent Q is a solid at most atmospheric temperatures. If disseminated by high explosive shell, the
of the explosion results in the decomposition of some of the Q, and the principal decomposition
product is H, some of which will appear as a vapor in the resultant toxic cloud. If flashing occurs on
dissemination of Q, the principal decomposition product will be hydrogen chloride (Ref. 30).
heat
H it
does not
react with alkyl iodides, chloramine-T, mercuric chloride or iodide, iodine, or bromine, it is not oxidized
by hydrogen chloride at l(X)"C, but at higher temperatures is decomposed to H and water @ef. 31).
3.3
PREPARATTON OF T AND Q
3.3.1
Preparation of
Agent T, or oxygen mustard, was fust prepared as a result of partial ctrlorination in the
thiodiglycol method of preparuion of H. This modification was carried out by preheating the thiodiglycol
to 60oC, then mixing it with conoentreted hydrochloric acid, during which, over the period of an hour,
the temperature rises to 110 to
Variations in conditions, principally temperaturs, varies the
proportion of H produced. The normal product ratio is 60 percent H and 40 pereent T (Ref. a).
lls'C.
2l
DoctJMENruNct:Asslr_EpuPgtyE!,-!tc,P!9r!o-ry_!ct-!,.?r9
a
Chenricel Nrme
1,2-Bis{hloroG6ylthio)+thuc (Rof. 7)
1,2-Bir(p-c.hlorocthylfio)c6re (Rcf. 4)
I :2-Di{2+hloroothylthio)cthrnc @cf. 28)
Ethyleoc bir p-chlorocthyl nrlphidc (Rcf. 26)
Stnrtrre
Chemical Formuh
qH'PrPs,
c#r2s2cr2
Moleculer Weiqht
%3.3 (Rcf. 3)
263.2 (R:et.29)
219.2 (Ref. 7)
Hvdrolysis
Hydrolyscs rolrtively slow (Ref. 7)
Insolublc - no hydrolysie
A procedure for preparation of pure T was reported in 1948 (Ref. 3l) in which T was produced
by the action thionylchloride in chlorofonn or in dimethylalamine on the hydroxyl corresponding to agent
T IIO(qH.SCrIIIOH)J].
3.3.2
Preparation of Q
Agent Q was first prepared with the reaction of thionylchloride with the hydroxy compound
conesponding to the chloroethyl compound that is Q. The hydroxy compound was prepared by the
interaction of ethylene dibromide and 2-hydroxye0ranethiol in alcoholic sodium ethoxide (Ref. 26). Pure
Q has been prepared by the photochemical addition of ethanedithiol to vinyl chloride.
22
a
Phvsical Shte et Room Temoerature
Liquid
Solid
-
Liouid Density
1,24A9
Boilinq Foint
140'C (Bef. 7)
353oC
(crlculrtd) (Rcf. a)
Freezinq Tcmpereture
56-57 oC (Rcf. 4)
Viscositv
18.3 cP
Surface Tension
,16.0 dyace/cm et 20cC (Ref. 29)
45.5 dyoos/cm
rt 25"C (Ref.
29)
Refrsctive Indcx
1.5394 et 2OcC (Ref. 29)
t.5173 rt 25oC (Ref. 29)
l9.l
Vapor hessure
0.1744 Torr rt 2OoC (Rcf. 29)
O.3O{4 Torr rt 25"C @cf. 29)
0.000013
nn
Solubilitl in rileten
Inrclublc (Ref. 7)
O.3
gtt
Solubilitv in Solvents
Rcedily solublc in moct orgrnic solvcnts,
in elcohol (Rcf. 7)
less colublc
Volstilitv
23
A process for semicontinuous plant production of Q was reported in 1955 (Ref. 32). This
involved the reaction of 2-mercaptoettranol with sodium hydroxide and subseguently ettrylene
dichloride
to yield bis(2-hydroxyethyl thio)ahane or sesquiglycol, the hydroxy corresponding to
as follows:
Z-nurcapo- dtun
cthapl hy&ort&
2Nasq,tr.oH + ctcfl.Cl
IIoCStfCrttrSCSt.OH + 2Mact
?tbhru-}
sesuiggr;ol
diclloride
Hoctflgct|I.Sczllpfl
saqutstycot
ffi
Pce,
'*'"",
o!ffi*#
cecprscsttsctll.ce + p(olrrtct
asc,tt
the sesquiglycol, in the presence of ethyl ether, is chlorinated by thionyl chloride to produce Q
follows:
-or
as
"*t;
(cHst)2o
vquistycot liilHk
ascnt Q
In another 1955 report (Ref. 33) several procedures were described for preparation of Q
as
reported by various investigators. A procedure whereby sesquiglycol was chlorinated with phosphorous
trichloride in the presence of methylene chloride was suggested as a potential method of preparing large
24
Table
15.
Lthal Elosage of H,
nep?99U9!98 ,tSt!,
T,
Eef,
a).
Agcat
(ng.miald)
(ry.nin/nP)
Mottcc
8@ - 4,140
r70 - 270
Rrt
E4O
- 1,512
1,700
400
> 1,600
900
- I,uls
2,000
Guincr Pig
Rrbbit
Crt
700
Dog
6m
Gort
1,9(X)
800
Monloy
I{Cr)50
L(Ct)50
Ucr)50
Aninel spocicr
(ng.Ein/n)
774
- \650
a
900
,,1
'No dstr
Table
16.
Expocurc Tlpo
Airflow
Totel Body
(body plus inhalrtion)
Body Only Exposurc
(hcc protcctod)
Inhrl4i66 EXpoeisc
(body prot*tcd)
Table
17.
(-H
T
o
Reto
Low
High
1,200
1,400
170
lm
Iow
3,5m
l,5oo
High
3,4(X)
510
I-w
1,6(x)
280
Hish
1,6(X)
2r0
Agart
(ag.lnidm)
20oc)
0.75
0.m015
0.000013
rlin rnr
oovcrcd or
'Thc
I Q dinolvod incithcr
dioxrno.
Modian
VesicrtinS Doso
Vesicetim
Rclativo to
Vesicrtio Roletivc
io H (H=11
H (H-100)
0.g)
(Not Covcrcd)
(Covcrod)
32
4
0.3b
100
ll
<100
<l
100-2m
26
Not Covcrod
3.6
There ue no prophylactic measures available for mustard intoxication by sulfur mustard agents
other than physical protection afforded by protective masls, clothing, shelters, and ointment (M5).
Protection, fust aid, and therapy for erynsure to mustard on the battlefield are covered in U.S. Army
Field Manual t-2E5 (Ref. t8). In generd, therapy and prophylaxis for sulfur mustard agents are identical
to those for nirogen mustards given in Section 2.7.
3.7
EMPTOYMENT
II.
alone.
Employment, or plans for employment, of T in weapons have not been found. However, the
procedure that produced T as a contaminant in the producion procedure for H yields a mixture of H (at
the 95 percent purity of HD) and T at ratio of 60:40 (Ref. a). This procedure was used by the British
during lVorld \Yar II in plurt production of a mixed agent desiguted IIT. The product is a viscous liquid
with a boiling point above 2E"C, a fteezing point near 0oC, and a volatility slightly less than that of HD.
Data for toxicity indicated levels of toxicity in some laboratory animals $eatsr than that of HD, for other
animals, less than that of HD. The principle adyantage of the HT mixture over HD would be for
employrnent at a temperature below the freezing point of HD, that is, below about t5'C. With liquid
deposition on a target, the H component of the mixture evaporates first, leaving an agent T residue,
which, due to its persistency oow volatiliry), presonts a long-tcrm cioutact hazard.
It should be noted that in 1945, the mixture HT was approved as the fill for tbe 4.2-inch chemical
rnortar shell o replace agent L as fill for ttrat round. The 60:,lO HT mixture was, at that time, being
manufacturod in England and Cmada by the process described above. Agent for the 4.2-inch mortar
round was to be procured ftom Canada. It was evaluated as being superior to agent L (Ref. 3a).
Mortar rounds and 105-mm projectiles filled with HT are, at present, in the U.S. stockpile
chemical weapons and are slated for destruction (Ref. 35).
27
of
SECTION
4.t
4.1.1
Intro0uction
(HL)
The compound designated as Lewisite has been known since 19O4 (Ref. 32). Soon after the use
of sulfur mustard by the German army in l9l7, rt least four different arsenicals were used, but were
viewed by th'C Germurs as leis effective thur sulfur mustard. These did not include 0re arsenical
designatod Lewisite. Lewisite was so named beause it was developed and promoted by Professor W.
Lee Lewis of Northwestern University, a captain in the U.S. Army in 1917. Due to its immediate effects
and apparent greater toxicity and incapaciu,tion capability on personnel than sulfur mustard, it was
considered a highly potent agent. Because the production process was suaightfonrard, a production plant
was built, production proceoded, and a shipment of Lewisite was enroute to Europe when the war ended
in November 1918 (Ref. 4,7, t6). In U.S. defense literature, Lewisite is frequently designated M-1,
puticularly in literature published during and immediately following World War II.
4.1.2
The chemical struchrre and properties of L and HL are listed in Table 18. The physical properties
of these egents are given in Table 19.
4.2
Lewisite, as synthesized, occurs as a mixture of cis and rrans isomers. Samples of each form
were obtainod by oxidation to the corresponding acid, then purifred by recrystdlization and reduction to
yield the respective pure cis or trans isomer. The toxicity of the two forms is essenrially identical so
there is no particular military advanuge of one over the other. They do differ in most physical
properties; fteezing point for the cis isomer is reported x 44.7"C and -1.2'C for the razs isomer. The
physical properties given in Table 19 are for the mixture.
The hydrolysis of Lewisite is rapid and involves several rcversible reactioru (Ref. 32):
Iast
dCfllsCl, +
2H2O
ClCdIis(OH)z
slow
ClrCfllsoH,
Tf Hp +
2HCt
slow
aCfly'sO Tr (ACflrasQx
(oxidc)
(gemlnal dioA
(polyner)
The oxide is mildly toxic and vesicant, and it is not further hydrolysed in acidic solutions. It is
nonvolatile and iruoluble in water; thus, it separates from water. The polymer of tho oxide may form
hard insoluble lumps (Ref. a). In aqueous solution above pH 10, the oxide formed by the hydrolysis of
29
Table
lE.
and
HL.
HL
Chemical Neme
Dichloro{2-chlorovinyl)rrsine +
bie{2-chlorocthyl)sulfidc (Rcf. 3)
Dichlom-(2<hlorovinyl)$8iDc (Rcf. 3)
Chlorovinyl rnino dichloridc @of. 3)
2-Chlorovinyldichloro rninc @of. 3, 7)
Dichloro-2+hlorwinyl rnino (Rcf. 5)
Chloroothcoyl rreinc (Rcf. 7)
2-Chlorovinyl rrsiac dichlorido Eof. 7)
0{tlorovinyl dichloro$sinc (Rcf. 7)
Chemical Stnrcture
CICH
2 +
- cg-nr/
\
crcH
I
- CH-As
ct
Chcmicel Formule
cJtcr2s + c2llrAscr'
C2II2AsCrz
Molcculsr Vl,cirht
207.35 (Rcf. 3)
20?.32 (tuf.s)
186.4 (Rof. 3)
It6.8 (Rof. 37)
@utetic Mixturc)
Ratc of Illdnolvsis
Vcry Repid
Hydrolvsis
Rspid
Mucts
(Acidic)
Hydroclloric ecid, thiodiglycol, end
(Acidic) (Ref.
Hydrochloric rcid end chlorovinyl-
rrscoou oridc
chlorovinylereoaous oxidc
@rsic) (Rof. 5)
@asic)
Acctylcoc
Sodiua rrccortc
Odor
Gerlic
Gcrrnium
Lewisite, yields acetylene and inorganic arsenite, which are nonvesicant Eef. 36). Chlorine reacts with
Lewisite in the absence of water to yield arsenic trichloride and dichloro*trylene.
Lewisite and Lewisite oxide in aqueous solution are oridizd by a number of oxidants, including
chloramine, to yield 2-ctrlorovinylarsonic acid. They are slowly oxidizd in fresh water, sea water, and
soil. The product, 2-chlorovinylarsonic acid may produce no physiologicd effects, or may be very
slightly toxic. Oxidation beyond the acid is not readily achieved Eef. 4).
30
Table
19.
Physical Properties of
and HL.
HL
Phvsical State
rt
R.oom Tcsnprrturc
Liquif
Uquid
DElsltv
Liquid
l.t1
g/nf
3)
et 25oC (Ref. 5)
1.92 gln.l et OcC (Rcf. 29)
l.tt76 jlme $ 20"C (RGf 29)
1.8793 glmt
25'C (Rof 29)
1.t542 glml 40'C Eof. 29)
1.88
t
*
Boilins Point
Bclow l90oC (Ref.3,37)
l90oC @ef. 3, 5)
195.9"C (Ref. 29)
Dcomoosition TemDereture
Abovc 100'C (Ref. 3)
Abovo l00cC
Freczim Tfrnlrersturc
-18
(Rcf 5, 29)
Flash Point
Elocs not flash @ef. 3, 5)
Viscosity
2.19 ($.4fi H259.6fi L) rt 25'C (Ref. 33)
3.10 (50:50 nix) rt 25'C @cf. 37)
2,89
Surfece Tercion
44.2 dlaes/co et 10oC
41.8 dynoc/cm et 20"C
4l.l dyncs/co et 25oC
39,3 dynedcm rt 40oC
(Rcf. 29)
@ef. 29)
(Rcf. 29)
(Rcf. 29)
Rdrac{ive.Indcx
1.6201 .t OoC (Ref. 29)
1.6101 et 20oC (Ref. 29)
1.6076 rt 25oC (Rof. 29)
1.6001 rt 4OoC (Ref. 29)
3l
o c U ttt E N r
19.
Table
tF t E
UP o
N n e p n o D,? c T! o
Phvsical Prooerties of
and
IIL
urvclA ss
WP ! ;!t,P*lS )
(Cont'd)
HL
Latent
Hat
of Yrmrizrtion
Vrmr
h,cssurc
3)
3)
Sl-
mn HX u lO:C ($:f._3)
0.248 mm--Ilg et-20'C{Rcf.-3)
l'03 mn H3-et 4OoC (Rcf' 3)
0.O2
Solubilitv in Weter
jlt
36)
Quilc i$olublc
(Rof.
0.5
Insolublc (Rcf. 3)
Slightly rclublo (Rcf. 5)
Volatilitv
3)
3)
fi
2S
mglm,t qt
-1!'C @ef. 3)
et 20'C-(Rcf.-3, 37)
lJl-!-urild
lo,27o E8/d 40'C (Rcf. 3' 37)
Chlorinationof Lewisite in water yields tetra$loroarsine, which is unstable and oonvrts in water
to the arsenic acid. Chlorination yields relatively nontoxic products Eef. 7). Lewisite is corrosive to
duminum, but does not react with high-qudity steel, so storage in steel containers will prcserve thc
qudlty of the agent indefinitely. For storage in iron, sabilizers must be'added to ilre agent.
4.3
PREPAMTTON OF AGENT
4,1.1
Preparation of Lewisite
The original procedure for preparation of Lewisite war the reaction of acetylene uichloride
catalyzed by aluminum chloride as follows (Ref. a):
l2
(L-1)
CJI,
(CEH
CI{$sCt
(L-2)
->
The above materials, L-1, L-Z and L-3, are the primary, secondary and tertiary dichloroarsines
that have beeo designated Lewisite A, B, and C or l, 2, and 3. Lewisitg A or I is the compound
designated pure Lewisite, and the one sought in the preparation process. In the above procedure, I tar
residue and an explosive materid were dso formed. The product of this procedure contained only 20
percent Lewisite (that is, L-l).
Subsequent
o World lYu I, other procedures were examined, panicularly the use of other
catalyss. It was found that one of the.best catdysts was cuprous chloride used with ethanolamine
hydrochloride to yield a relatively clean product. Mercuric chloride was also used effectively. Work
was undertaken during World War II to dwelop an inexpensive process for preparation of arsenic
trichloride. It was found that crude arsenic trichloride recovered ftom ore of the Gold Hill, Utah, deposit
could be converted to highquality arsenic trichloride. The procedures were used during World War IL
4.3.2
Preparation of HL
HD and L are mutudly miscible, various HL mixtures could be prepared for use in
different environments below the fteezing point of HD (15'C) by taking the advantage of tlre greater
toxicity and persistency of HD. A eutectic mixture of HL with a freezing point of -25oC could be
prepared by mixing 63 parts of L with 37 parts of IID by weight or 56 parts of L wi0r 49 parts of HD
Because
4,4
4.4.1
Lewisite
Contact of Lewisite liquid or vapor by skin or eyes causes immediate pain that is rnore intense
than that caused by sulfur mustard. Visible irritation of the conjunctiva and complete elosing of eyelids
hour or less after contact, depending on agent concentration. Pain from skin
contamination begins as a stinging sensation and progress* to deep, aching pain. Liquid contamination
causes a grey area on the skin within 5 minutes, followed by erythema similar to Olat caused by sulfur
mutard. Blisters deeper than mustard blisters develop in about 12 hours. Exposure of skin to vapor may
result in erythema, but seldom in blisters. The vapor concentration re4uired to produce blisters is beyond
a field capability. Pain accompanying erythema persiss for 2 or 3 days. Severe skin lesions resulting
from Lewisite burns will usudly heal in 18 to 30 days. Fluid occurring in Lewisite-produced blisters is
nontoxic, but does contain some residud arsenic. The response to a drop of L as compared to a drop
of H deposited on the human forearm and the progressive course of effect is shown in Table 20 Eef. 7).
occur wittlin
33
D O C U M E N7
Table
20.
UNCLA SS
Sequential Effect
tF t
E D U p O N R Ep R O D U C T t O N
J_C
p
:1.,_
p. r_G
Tine
Lcwisits
Sulfur mrtstrrd
At rpplication
Slight buruing
Nothing
Slow rosorption
Dovclopmcot of resh
Nothhg
lr{sthing
135 Ein.
195 Ein.
270 EiD.
Incrcrsd b,urnirg
315 EiE.
Focru of infleomrtion 3
of tho drop
Aftor: 5 min.
t{ rnin.
lg min.
105
Eh.
Ycllowish-red coloretion
15 cm
No acosrtious
tircs rs lergc rs
of tho mudrrd
Tigsuo swells
900 min.
Sbrrp demrrcrtion from healthy tissue; no blistcr formrtion; inflrmmrtion yellowish white
uh
Ono lrryo blistcr hrs formcd from dl tho blieton (12 cm lon3, 7 cm widc, 4 cm high); stin
tiraro eround il intcnsoly rd, pufi
32b
6th dey
Hceling begins
tth dry
l0th dey
360 min.
7t0 min.
On:
2nd dey
3rd dey
4th
&y
12th
&y
thet
formrtion in ccntsr
blrckish
14th d8y
&y
26th dry
it
Skin growing over; Bom nocrotic foci in center; letor heeling; lcnde,ncy !o dcvclopmnt boils
HGdd
34
Mild intoxication of the eyes will persist for a few days, whereas seyere intoxication of the eyes,
particululy wih liquid agent, may result in permanent injury and blindness. Inhalation of vapor produces
immediate pain aud serves o give an immediate warning of the presence of the agent. Exposure causes
lesions in the respiratory passages. Coughing and nasal secretions will occur, and fluid may accumulate
in the chest cavlty.
Lewisite has not bem used by, or against, the United States in combat, and there are no recorded
human deaths from exlnsure to Lewisite. Thus, pathologicd rnanifestations of Lewisite intoxication in
man have not-been described.
Absorption of Lewisite liquid or vapor through the skin of dogs may cause death in less than 48
hours as a result of shock associated with loss of circulation fluid. With small nonfatal doses, vapor or
liquid inoxication by Lewisite througb the skin or by inhalation will canse hemolytic anemia, necrosis
of the liver and the biliary passages, and injury o the intestind muoosa. hilmonary edema, restlessness,
weakness, subnormd tempersilre, low blood pr6sure, and diarrher mey accompany severe Lewisite skin
burns (Ref. 4).
The mcchanism of Lewisite action is not known. There have becn assurnptiors, based on the
similarity of symptorns to that of mustard agents and the presence of chlorides, that Ore mechanism is
similar to fiat of mustard (Ref. 17). However, there is little basis for this assumption in terus of
experimental data, or on a theoretical basis. A reasonable assessment, basod on curent knowledge, is
that the biochemicd mechanism of the oxicity of Lewisite is distinct from thet of sulfur mustard. This
can be, in part, based on the antidotal effectiveness of British Anti-Lewisite (2,3dimercaptopropanol;
dimercaprol or BALI and other dithiols in chelating the trivalent arsenicals and comp*itively reversing
the chelation reaction between arsenic and the critical thiol groups of enzymes. However, BAL has no
effect on, nor does it relate in any sense to, the mustard agens Eef. 10).
It was early observod Eef. 39) that the action of Lewisite (and other arsenic compounds ineluding
Lewisite oxide) resembled the action of iodoacetate on the pyruvate oxidase system, and 0rat cysteine and
glutathione were competitors of the thiol groups of the pyruvate oxidase system for the iodoacetate or the
arscnicals. Howevetr, the comptition of these monothiol compourds, ttrat is, cysteine and gluathione,
was insufftcient to completely arest Ure effect of ttre arsenical on the pynvete system. A search was
undertatm for a dithiol that would form a stable ring with the trivalent arsenicd Lewisito. Several
dithiols of low molecular size were synthesized and tested, including BAL.
Parenteral adminisuation of BAL within 2 hours of skin exposure to Lewisite prevented not only
the skin effects of Lewisite, but the systemic effects as well. Howwer, Ore effert of a single treatment
with BAL did not provide continuous protoction. Injection of BAL et 4{our intervels fot 24 hours, and
less frequently at reduced doses thereafter, provided adequate protection. BAL has adverse effects on
various tissues, probably intorfering with cellular respiration and with m*allic respiratory requirements.
BAL not only reacts with arsenicals, but has been effective in preventing and reversing the effects of
other heavy metals on enzyme systems (Ref. a0).
A recent review of literaure (Ref. 17) directed oward waluating Lewisite and mustard
agents
as causes of delayed action debilitating and potentidly fatal diseases, particularly cancer, presented the
35
general conclusion that too linle information was available to establish a cytogenic and mutagenic effect
of Lewisite on animal tissuo.
4.4.2
Agent
HL
Limited experimental data indicate that the symptoms resulting from HL intoxication reflect ilre
of each of the agents constituting the mixture. Thus, immediate irritation of the skin
and eyes result from liquid or vapor contanrination of those orgarr, as expected from Lewisite
inoxication. Pulurcnary exposure mry produce derna in the respiratory muoosa and fluid accunulation
in the ctrest ririvity. Blister cliaracteristics reflcct those associated with eath agent. The protection
afrorded by rapid hydrolysis of L in contact with surface body fluids associated with lacrimation and
sweating will be negated by the mustard present. The contribution of each component of the HL mixore
to the toxicology of HL hu not beil differentiated Eef. al).
symptromatology
4.5
TOXICITY
The toxicity of L in terms of the lehal dosage for laboratory animals where the entire body
(unprotectod respiration) is exposed to L vapor is given in Tablc 21. Data are ftom multiple exporimental
sources. In Tables 22 ard 23 dau of toxicity for animals under desigruted exposure conditiors are given.
The ldhal dose for man is estimated from animal exposure data obtained primarily during World War
tr. Estimates published since are not different from those published at that time. Estimates of toricity
for man are presented in Table 24.
Table 2I.
AriErl
qc0s0
(nin)
(mg'ninlf)
10
0.9 - 1.4
2.8
Mousc
l0
t0
1.5
2.5 - 2.E
0.5
10
9-14
9 -25
60
Rrt
1.5
- r80
0.58
9-25
60
1.5
- lEo
0.5t
9-14
1.0
5-180
0.57
7.5 - 13
60 - 310
t.2
Goet
100 - 255
r.25
Dog
7.5
- 1.5
1.4
Guinor Pig
Rrbbil
1.5
36
TableZ2.
Coadition
Exporure
L(C050
(nin)
(mg.Ein/f)
10
10
1.2 - I.9
0.3
l0
7.0
Herd Protcctd
Monso
Inhdstim
- 1.5
1.6
1.4
10
10
l0
1r-5
9 -25
20.o
l0
15.0
Ctt
30-45
30.0
Do8
30-60
l0
30.0
R,;
Hed Protectd
Rrbbit
Table
,10.0
(mg&g)
Animel
r5
Monss
t5-24
Rtt
5-6
Rrbbit
t2
Guince Pig
Table 24.
Dog
38 - ce.70
Gost
to-24
Liquid
(ag.nlirilt)
(ne)
Level of lntoxicgtion
Derth by inhqletion
Dcrth by pcrcutanoous exposure
Vcsication of cxposcd ekin
Scrious comesl &mage
1.2
L.5 (estinated)
100 (estinaled)
2t00 (mtinatod)
t.2 - 1.5
o.014
0.05 - 0.1 mg/cmz
1.5 (estimeted)
0.1 (cstiustod)
37
It is not litely that better drta on toxicity for man will be obtained, but the data presented do raise
questions.
some
For example, the inhalation lethal dosage for man in Table 24 is no greater thur tha
for mouse in Table 22. One publicuion gives a vdue of 6 mg.min/f as the dosage required to produce
lesiors on bare skin exposed to yapor, as comparod to the value givm in Table 24. Other reported
dosages @ef. 7) are 1.5 to 2.5 mg.min/t as an LD50, 0.15 mg.min/t to produco cye inflammation, and
0.75 mg'min7t leads to severe incapacitation.
4,6
4.6.1
Prophliaxis
There are no prophylactic measures for protection against ur sttack with Lewisite other tltan
physicd protection afforded by protective masks, clothing, shelters, and oinrncnt (M5). Protection, first
aid, and fterapy for exposure to vesicants on the battlefield are covered in U.S. Army Field Manud
E-285 (Ref.
lt). The vesicant agent protective ointment Mli is a white substance containing drloramide
5-330. It is
for epplication to the skin to protect against aad neltrdizc vesicant agent
If, subsequent to contamination of the skin by Lewisite, BAL ointment is used, the M5
intended
contamination.
First aid involves removd of evident droplets of liErid agent on skin or clothing by lifting off or
bloning, followed by the application of decontaminant pads and powder.
Liquid contamination in the eyes must be rernoved immediately, within seconds, by irrigating the
eyes with water from a canteen or other clean water supply. In a contaminated area, this should be done
while holding the breath bgween doffrng and donning the mask. Tearing of the eyes should also be
encouraged as this will minimize the effect of agent L.
Contamination by Lewisite is distinguishable from mustard contamination because of the
immediate strnging and pain sensation in skin contaminated by Lewisite. This sensation should illicit an
immediate response to decontaminate and take subsequent measures appropriate to Lewisite intoxicuion.
4.6.2
Therapy
Application of BAL ointment to areas of skin contaminated by Lewisite should be made as soon
prior to appearance of any vesication. The ointment should be applied in a thin layer and
removod after 5 minutes. BAL has some adverse effects on tissue; therefore, it cannot be applied u a
as possible,
contamination preventative.
Erythema re4uires no specific treatment and will heal in a few days. Blisters should be treated
as therurd burn blisters. Large blisters and blisters on the face should not be bandaged. Itching may
be treated with calamine lotion or steroids. Open blisters might require use of burn creams to prevent
bacterid infection. With severe blistering and penetration to subcutaneous layers, treatrnent for shock
may be required by adminisEation of electrolytes.
Eye intoxication is treated with eye ointments. Pain is alleviated with morphine or other systemic
medication. A drop of atropine three times daily will aid in alleviating pain from severe photophobia ud
38
DOCUMENTUIVCLASStFtEOUpONREqRODUCTIO!!C!'_-!!9?*G
blepharospasm. Sulfacetamide may be applied to control infection. Pressure of dressings on the eye
should be avoided.
No experience with respiraory involvement fiom kwisite exposure in man has occurred. It is
assumed that effects and trearnent will be similar to that of mustard, i.e., mild cases of respiratory
involvement are treatod symptomatically to relieve cough rnd mild pain, and antibiotic treatment may be
required if bronchial pnzumonia develops. Orygen adminisration and physical clearing of the respiratory
lnjections of BAL may cause physiological syuptoms including oppressionof the chest and throat,
burning sensation, muscular actres, mild nausea and possibly vomiting. These effects may appear within
15 to 30 minutes after an injection of BAL urd may persist for 30 minutes.
Since the therapy for mustard intoxication is indicated for Lewisite, the therapy
by agent HL strould not be different than that described above.
4.7
EMPLOYMENT
4.7.1
Employment of Lewisite
for intoxication
Agent L was produced and intended for use, but was not used, by the U.S. Army as a chemical
warfare agent during World War
It was, at that time, assumed that agent L would be more effective
agent
H.
This
assumption
was
thur
based on limited rxearch regarding the action of L on laboratory
animals, particularly dogs and rabbis, and on some accidental exposures of laboratory personnel. It was
observed that the lesions produced as a result of these accidents were deeper and more painful than
lesions resulting from H intoxication. Experimental work indicatod that rabbits were more sensitive to
agent L than H with regard to rnanifest skin effects, damege to eyes, and systemic response. However,
it was subsequently shown that the gteater response of rabbits to L, as compared to H, did not reflest nor
simulate the comparative effects of these agents in man. Dogs were about equdly resporuive to L and
H with regards to skin and eye effects, but more susceptible to.systemic response with agent L than with
H. The effect of L vapor on the respiratory system of the dog was twice that of agent H. It was later
ddermined that thE response of the dog to L as compared to H did not simulate the comparative response
of man. Researctr with agent L was not undertahen in the United States between World War I and World
War II; however, reports published in 1932 in Germany showed that agent L was inferior to agent H.
I.
Itr/ith entry of the United States into World lVar II, production of L was undertaken coincident
with research and testing in ttre United Sutes and England. Research during World \Var II of the effects
of L on Eren as compared to H, reversed the previous perception concerning the superiority of L. It was
determined that a comparison of a small dose of L with a like dose of H on human skin demonstratod that
L was more effective, but comparisons of higher doses of each agent showed that skin lesions in man
were much more severe, were more painful, and required much more time to hed with H than with L.
39
Field testing during \[orld War tr demonstrated that gmeration and maintenance of Lewisirc vapor
was not militerily feasible. An initial effective concentration could be achiwed only over a very smdl
minutes. Dissemination was tested with bombs and spray tanks. Agent L, thictened by
wls comparod o nonthicke,ned L disseminated ftom I spray tanlc or aircraft.
Droplets of nonthickenod L dissGminatd ftom spray tanls u 2000 ft above ground evaporate before
reaching the lround. Droplets of ttrickened L were deposited on the ground, but became hardened, whictt
roducod the effectiveness ofvapor releaso by droplets. Thickened L, when sprayed from an aircraft spray
tank at 200 fect above the ground, was less effective than nondickened L in producing casualties in goats
that were plac-+ on the gpound.in the targA area. The properties of thickened L and HL are discussed
in greater detail in References 4L ard 42.
area
for
a few
It was also found that banle clottring provided fairly good protection from L vapor. Additionally,
of the rapid hydrolysis of L, penetration of wet clothing did not occur. High atmospheric
humidity hydrolysod the agent. The principd hydrolysis product is Lewisite oxide, whictr is mildly
vesicating, and is nonvolatile. It is insoluble in water, but is degraded in dkaline solutions.
because
As stated in a previous section, the HT was officially designated the chemical agent fill for the
4.2-inch ctremical mortar round, replacing L Eef. 34). This should indieate recognition of the general
unsuitability of L as a CIV agent. Howwer, the ease of L production and its suitability for use in a dry
climate agairut poorly rained and equrpped troops, may justiS concern for possible employment of it
by some nilitary forces.
4.7.2
Employment of HL
L mixed with tI arose primarily from a need to reduce the freezing point of agent H.
The mixture of L with H as Levinstein mustard yielded a material highly corrosive to steel and other
metal containers. The mirfire of L and agent HD yielded a product reasonably stable in storage. The
freezing (or melting) point of the L and HD mixhre, which will be assumed to be HL, is -25"C for the
e.utctic mixilre. A frcczing point of 42"C is reported for a producion plant product. The very low
freezing poiat of ttre plant product results from the presence of impuritix.. The H portion of the product
with this low freezing point is Lcvirstein mustard rather than HD (Ref. 43). Agent HL will serue as a
moderately effective blister agent for use at atmosphuic temperatures below ooC. At temperatures above
0oC, agent IIT may be more appropriately used. At temperahrres above l5oC, agent HD may be more
effective than HT, and is easily more effective than HL.
Tho use of
40
5.1
DETECTION
A recent survey of the equipment available and the capabilities of detecting chemical agents in the
field is presentod in the Joint CB Technical Data Source Book, Volume XIII (Ref. aa). A number of
fielded chemical agent detectors, dating back several years, are discussed in that document. A brief
summary of so.me of those detectors is presented here.
a.
PaDer. Chemical ASent Daector. ABC-M8. This d*ector paper is a Canadian development,
the outcome of a joint ripartite endeavor. It was qrpe classifred in 1964. The paper d*ecs liquid agent
deposited on surfaces ard differentiat$ among H, G and V agcnts. The paper gives a color reaction after
it is used to blot a liErid rgent dropla on a contaminatod surfece. The M9 paper, dweloped rnore
recently than the MB paper, is in many respects inferior to the M8. It responds to liquid agent impacting
on the p8p9r, but does not detect mustard, nor does it identify agents it has detected. There is no
indication thu the M8 paper could be used to daect any of the agents discussed in this book.
b. Detector Kit. Chemical Agent. M256l256A1. The M256 kit war qpe classified in 1977. lt
d*ects and identifies liquid and vapor agent, but requires 20 minutes for detection. For vapor detection,
the kit contains a plaquette with the reegents needod to indicate the presence of all detectable agents. It
contains eight sampler/detectors for vapor and a bookle of 25 M8 papers for liquid daection. Thc kit
respottds to several qpical interfering battlefield vapors. This kit will detect L and HL and should be
able to detect T and possibly Q. tt is not identified as a daector for HN.
c.
Water Testing Kit- Chemical Agent- M272- This kit contains reaction tubes to test for blood
and blister agents and enzyme tickets o identify nerve agents. The kit weighs 2.5 pounds and contains
reagent for 25 tests for each agent group. This kit is assumed capable ofdetecting all agens discussed
in this book.
d. Chemical Agent Automatic Portable Alarm- Mt. The ME alarm has l0 variations, all based
on two basic components, the M43 detector and the M42 alarm. The origind M43 (and the follow-on
M43Al) does not detect blister agents. A current modification that was developed in response to interest
by the U.S. Marine Corps (Ref. 45), has, as an add-on to th M43Al., the capability to detect blister
agents as well as newe agents (Ref. a6).
e. Individual Chemicd Aqent Detector fiCAD). The ICAD is a small detector for individual use.
It detects nearly all known ehemical agents; howener it does not detect VX. In addition to individual usc,
it may bc used u a point, remote, or drop+ffsampler. It can transmit detection up to l0 km. It utilizes
olectrochemical sensors and distinguishes botween blister agents md all the other detectable agen6 as a
group. The electronic module has a S-year life span and ttre sensor a 4-rnonth span of continuous
It is uncertain if this detector would derect T and Q. Presumably it will detect HN and L.
f.
use.
Chemical Agent Monitor (CAM). The CAM is a hand-held monitor used to detect urd
distinguish contamination of blister or nerve agnts on surfaces. The CAM detects vapor emanating from
a surface when atmospheric temperature is in the range of 45 to -30'C. Its performance can suffer
4L
interference from high concentrations of sone comtilrn battlefield contaminants. The time to respond
to 0.1 mg/rr3 of musurd was 6 scconds. An upgrdc of the CAM is in pmgress. The CAM will
probably not detect T aod Q, but mary detect L snd HN.
g.
Standofr Remote Seming Chemicsl Agent Alann. XM2l. This man-portable unit remotely
detects chernical agent clouds at up to 5 km by maetrr of an infrarod spestroradiometer. Response time
is less than one minute. The unit cost of 6e X[Ol is projerted at $60 to $75 thousand, a cost that will
eriiomitic Ctremicd l,tent p*ector ^Atanrr" XU22 (eCaOA). Tlre XN122 is an advanced
point sampling darm that identifies dl agenE at nerr minirnum detectablc levels in the presence of
interfering conteminans. Thk dae$or will probebly not detect T and Q because of the lack of
vaporization of these agents. Tte d*ection of HN is specifically indicated.
h.
5.2
PHYSICAL PROTECTION
5.2.1
Collective Protection
Standard physical protection agairut chemical warhre agents for U.S. military personnel is
available as collective protection and individual protection. Collective protection is provided in any
enclosed stnrcture that protects personnel ftom chemicd agent (liquid or vapor) and allows them to work
unencumbered by persond protective equipment. The key element of the collective shelter is the filtered
air circulating system. Collective protection systern supply the shelter with air that has passed through
activated charcoel and particulate filters. The charcoal filter adequately removes agent wpor. Most
pennanent stmcnrres can be converted to collective protectiotr if the air entering the system can be filtered
urd positive pressure within Ore structure mainuined. Some collective shelters in the U.S. military
invenory that would provide protedion from HN, L, T and Q are:
e.
unit.
b.
Translortable Collective Protection System (fCPS). The TCPS is an inflatable strucnrre for
emergency use in the field. It provides a rest area or light work area protected from an external toxic
environment.
d.
M20 SimDlified Collective Proteetion Room Liner System. The M20 is an inflatable room
liner and is equipped with a protected entry and a filterod air circulation system.
Collective protection systems have been developed for use on ships and for various vehicles, such
as the Ml tank.
42
5.2.2
Protective Clothing
With the introduction of chemical warfare agents in World War I, the need for a chemical
protective covering for the entire body was recognized, and impregnated clothing was developed. The
clothing of World War I through World War [I was impregnated with chloramides as protection against
mustard vaEir and, to some extent, against liquid mustard (Ref. a). The chloramides oxidized and thus
inactivated mustard and Lewisite, but are not effective against the nitrogen mustards. Charcoal-impregnated clothing material was investigated in the \Vorld \Yu II era. The charcoal in ttre clothing adsorbs
the agent valnrs, but does not cause decomposition of the agents. Special purpose protective systems
may be of iniiermeable material that completely encapsulates the wearer.- Current U.S. protective
clothing is composed of charcoal-impregnated material.
Battle Dress Overgarment (BDO). The BDO consists of gloves, boots, hood, helmet cover,
and a twoaiece suit consisting of a jacket that has a zippered front and pants that have a fly front and
zippered legs. The suit material is an outer layer of nyldn-cotton and an inner layer of charcoalimpregnated polyureftrane foam. The outer layer is water repellant. The gloves have a black butyl
rubber outer material and an inner glove of thin white cotton. The boos are butyl rubber and made to
be worn as an overboot. The helmet cover and hood are of butyl-coated nylon cloth. The hood is fitted
to an Ml7 series mask (Ref. a7).
a.
b.
Chemical Protective Outfit (CPO). The CPO is the current standard U.S. military protective
uniform. The CPO is a two-piece overgarment, jacket and trousers, and also includes overboots, gloves,
and hood. The overgarment is two layers; the inner layer is cotton cloth and is impregnated with
activated charcoal, and the outer layer is nylon/cotton twill in stardard camouflage pattems or solid olive
green. The hood, gloves, and boots are rnade of butyl rubber. The entire outfrt weighs 1.7 kg.
c.
Saratoea System Protective Clothing. The adsorptive component of this system is composed
spheres adhered between fabric layers. Configurations consist of the army ground crew
ensemble, the aircrew coverall, the light combat coverall, urd the under-coverall for ground crew. These
of charcoal
contamination.
5.2.3
A number of masks are available. Many of them are special purpose masks designed for use in
operating specialized equipment, such as aircraft. Two multipurpose masks are:
a.
Ml7
b. Mask. Chemical-Biological: Mrt0- M42. The M40 multipurpose mask is used by army
infantry, while the M42 is designed for use in combat vetricles and differs some in construction.
+3
5.3
DECOI\TTAMINATION
5.3.1
Intrcduction
Decontaurination of the agents discussed in this book may be accomplished by physical removal
of the agmt, by ne$ralization of the sgent by ehemical reaction, or by naturd decontrmination or
weathering, Physical removal can be by scraping away droplas or blotting with a blotting msterial. It
may be accomplished by washing and scnrbbing or with solvents. The chomicd decontaminanb are
dmost exclus_ively chlorine compounds that oxidize the agent. The decontemhetrts af,e applied using
standard deconiemination equipment
5.3.2
a. M29l
tit
@.
This kit is used once only and discarded. The kit is a plastic
b.
care conuining foil envelopes. Three packets are marked DECON I WIPE and each contains a gauze
pad containing decontamination solution. Instructions are on the pack* and the container; Three pack*s
are marked DECON 2 WIPE and each conuins a glass ampoule of decontamination solution. This
ampoule is
be broken onto a ganze pad, also provided in the packet. This kit is intendod for
decontanination of non- facial skin, clothing, and other persond equipment. The solutions are poisonous
and carstic.
c. Dgcontaminating and Reimpregnatin&Kit. Individual. ABC-MI3. This kit contains a pad filled
with skin decontaminating powder (fuller's earth), two bags of decontaminating and reimpregnating
powder (chloramine), a capsule of dye, and a cutter to cut away heavily contaminated clothing. The
reimpregnating powder would not be effective against HN.
d.
on rmst vehicles and is intended for use in decontaminating military vetricles and crew-serviced weapons.
The ABC-Mll is being replaced by the M13 portable decontamination apparatus.
e. Ml3
f.
5.3.3
Decontaminants
a.
b.
FWer Tropical Bleach (STB). When freshly made, STB conains 30 pacent available
chlorine, but loses some chlorine content durrng storage. It is composed of chlorinated lime and calcium
oxide. The STB is stored dry and may be used dry or mixed with water to decontaminate surfaces
contaminated with mustard. This decontaminant is less effective than HTH (high+est hypochlorite)
against HN. It is a standard U.S. military item.
c.
High-Test Hypochlorite (IITII). Also calld high-tst bleach (IITB), HTH is cdcium
hypochlorite and is available as a dry solid. It is water soluble. A decontaminating solution should
contain 70 percent HTII. The available chlorine is greater 0ran in STts, and it is more corrosive.
e. Activatd
f.
Sodium Hloochlorite
decontaurinant composed of trro solutions that are mixed at the time of use. One solution is composed
of 0.1 percnt cdcium hypochlorite, 1.0 percent detergent, and 98.9 peroent water. The oths solution
is 2.0 percent sodium citratc dihydratc, 0.4 percent citric acid monohydrate, aud 97.6 perccnt water. Tte
final solution should have a pH of 7.4. The mixed solutions should have a decontamination effectiveness
half-life of 2 to 3 minutes. SLASH was developed to limit the corrosive action of the oxidizing agent
by using a low concentration of chlorine, increasing the effectiveness by controlling the pH, and limiting
the effective life of the decontaminating ingredients.
g.
monoethanolamine and
45
5.3.4
Decontamination Effectiveness
Specific data applicable to the effectiveness of the standard decontaminants in decontaminating the
agens addressed in this book have not been found. Spme difFrarlty may arise with these agents. The
insolubility and nonvolatility of T and Q will contribute to prolonged persistence of these two agents.
Since Q is a-solid at atrnospheric temperatures, its removal from surfaces by physical means should be
facilitatsd. Agent
than is
decontaminated than H.
The niirogen mustards'do not oxidize readily, but are decomposed-by some chloramides, by
calcium hypochlorite, and in dilute solutions of sodium hydroxide.
The nitrogen mustards hydrolyse in water, yielding toxic products at neutral pH and nontoxic
products in alkdine solutions. Decontamination of HN-l by MEA is preferred.
Agent HN-l in seawater at 25oC with a pH of 7.88 is reported to have a hdf-life of 1.5 minutes.
Hydrolysis of the toxic products derived from HN-l is estimated to have a half-life in seawater at 5'C
of 12.5 days (Ref. 49). Lewisite is decomposed to yield sodium arsenite and acetylene by aqueous
sodium hydroxide. The reaction with bleach has not been fully characterized. The hydrolysis of Lewisite
in seawater is very rapid, apparently yielding a pentavalent oxide of low toxicity. A problem with
decontamination and decomposition of Lewisite is the toxicity of residual arsenic. The question with
regard to use of L as a CIY agent and the resultant impact of the residual arsenic in the environment may
relate to fte degree of increase over the ubiquitous occurrence of arsenic in nature (Ref. 36).
5.3.5
Decontamination of Water
Lewisite hydrolpes readily to form Lewisite oxide, which is vesicant, insoluble in water, and
persistent. It is of concern in the contamination of water. The nitrogen mustards are also of concern as
toxic contaminurts of w&ter. The U.S. Army water purification unit, designated the Erdlator, was tested
in 1956 as to the effectiveness of removal of Lewisite (Lewisite oxide) and HN-3 from water. By the
use of large quentities of activated charcoal in the system, both of these agents were effectively removed
(Ref. 50).
The capability for removal of Lewisite or nitrogen mustards and their toxic derivative by reverse
osmosis has not been reported.
46
SECTION
6.1
6. pEMTLTTARIZATTON OF CHEIVTTCAL
INTRODUCTION
The chemical agents presently in U.S. military inventory are under the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Army and are presently stored at seven locations within the continental U.S. and at Iohnston Island. Of
the agens discussed in detail in this document, only the agent mixture HT is in the U.S. chemical
weapons inve_ntory as fill for 6.2-in mortar and 105-mm artillery rounds. Agens L and HL were
produced during World War II and were stockpiled, but were disposed of by dumping at sea. There is
no record of the nitrogen mustards or Q having been stockpiled by the United States. The Russians
reportedly have a stockpile of L and HL that is slated for destruction.
In
1985, the U.S. Army was directed by law !o dispose of all unitary chemical munitions and
agent in bulk containers. Various disposal procedures have been studied for thepast several years. The
question of sites for disposal has also been under consideration. The cunent policy is that, due to the
hazards and restrictions associated with transportation of agent outside storage sites, disposal will be
carried out at each storage site. This decision dictates that a disposal facility be constructed at each site
fi.ef. 35).
6,2
6.2.1
This disposal method was employed prior to 1970 and was a simple disposal procedure because
the agent could be sunk intact, encased in a strong protective envelope. The procedure was complicated
by the need for long{istance transport and by the lack of information regarding the ultimate fate of the
agents and their impact on the ocean environment. The surfacing of mustard munitions dumped in the
Baltic Sea @ef. 23) presents a basis for concern regarding the hazard of such disposal. Disposal at sea
is now prohibited by the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972.
6.2.2
Chemical Decomposition
In 1987, chemical treaty teams from various nations were invited by the Russians to visit and view
the chemical munition disposal facility developed by the Russians at Shikhany (Ref. 51). The system was
described as a thermochemical process. In the procedure, agetrt was drained ftom the munitions into the
neutralizer. Following neutralization of the agent, the products of neuualization were placed in the
combustion burner and exposed to a temperature of 1200oC. This procedure does not appear to offer
any advantage over direct incineration. The Shikhany disposd facility has since been inactivated because
of environmental concems.
47
6.2.3
Proposals have been made to place large quantities of chemical agent in a subterranean cavity
where a nuclear device could be detonated o produce temperarures that would dCIuoy the agent, the
containers, and the explosives in one operation. The unknowns and the known problems, such as the
nepd to transport agent to the site and the certainty of public opposition to the procedure, negate its
adoption.
6.2.4
Pyrolysis
Pyrolysis, accomplished by heating the agent to a high tempera$re in the absence of oxygen so
that the molecular strusture of the agent is altered to yield a nontoxic product, has been considered.
Uncertainty regarding the end products of pyrolysis lead to rejection of the procedure. The thermal
decomposition of mustard has been investigated. Complete decomposition of mustard in an atmosphere
of nitrogen was reported to be complete at 450oC, and the main products of decomposition were
hydrogen chloride, ethylene, ethylene dichloride, dithian, and 2:2'dichlorodiethyl disulfide; and at higher
temperatures, hydrogen sutfide and vinyl chloride (Ref. 37). These would be bxpected to occur with
pyrolysis of HT.
6.2.5
Combustion by Incineration
Past experience with incineration of mustard and GB has demonstrated the completeness of this
method of disposal. The oxidative combustion of mustard (BCES) is:
z(Clcfl); + 13 02+
8 COz + 2 SO,
+ 4 HCI +
6 H2O
The production of sulfur dioxide and hydrogen chloride necessitates their removal from the
discharge of combustion. Removal is accomplishable through the use of absorptive filters and scnrbbers
in the incinerator discharge train. There are incinerators at Tooele Army Depot [the Chemical Agent
Munitions Disposal System (eAMDS)l and at Johnston Atoll pohnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal
System (IACADS)]. The combustion of T in the HT mixture should yield end products similar to those
of agent H. Studies on incineration of agens in identification kits demonstrated effective incineration of
the nitrogen mustards, but problems noted with L included the ultimate disposal of the arsenic moiety
(Ref. 52, 53, 54).
6.2.6
Incinerator Design
The incinerator designed for disposal of ehemical agents is composed of four units:
a. Liquid
Incinerator
The liquid agent is drained from the munition or bulk container and is burned, along with any
liquid waste, in the liquid incinerator at 2700oF.
48
b.
The metd parts furnace decontaminates the munition casings and internal metal, whictr are heated
to a temperaure sufFrcient to destroy residual agent in or on the meal.
c.
Dqptivation Furnace
The deactivation furnace incinerates the explosive charges thathave been removed from chemical
munitions. The explosive materials are handled in a manner that accomplishes incineration without
explosive detonation. This treatment decomposes any residual chemical agent associated with ttre
explosive device.
d.
DunnaSq.Incinerator
Final approval for operation of disposal facilities in the continental U.S. has not been acquired
and is contingent on completion of testing and acceptancB of the Johruon Island facility.
49
APPENDIX
1.
Parker, Don
2.
Ward, Kyle,
A. REFERENCES
Jr.
3.
U.S. Arnii Field Manual 3-9. Potential Military Chemical/Biological e-gents and Compounds,
December 1990.
4.
Renshaw, Birdsey (Editor). Chemical Warfare Agents and Related Chemicd Problerns, Parts
II, and Parts IU-VI. National Deferue Research Committee, lVashington D.C, 1946, AD
I-
234270.
5.
U.S. Army Chemical Research, Dwelopment and Engineering Center. Aberdeen Proving
Ground, Maryland. Chemical Agent Data Sheets, Volume l. EA-SR-74001, AD8V28222,
December 1974.
6.
Field, John B, et d, Reversal of Nirogen Mustard Intoxication by Anti-Histamines. Proceedings of the Society of Experimentd Biology and Medicine. 115:106tr1ffi2,1964.
7.
E.
Gilman, Alfred, and Frederick S. Philips. The Biological Action and Therapartic Application
the F Chloroethyl Amimes urd Sulfides. Science 103:409415, 1946.
9.
Papirmeister, Bruno, et
al.
of
al.
Alkylation. Edgewood Arsend Technical Repot EATR 4650, Iune 1972, AD743M.
13. Greenwald, Blward S. Cancer Chemotherapy. Medical Examination hblishing Company,
Flushing, New York 1973.
A-l
14. Anilkumar, T.V., et d. The Nature of Cytotoxic Drug-Induced Cell Death in Murine Intestinal
Crypts. British Iournal of Cancer 65:552-55E 1992.
15. Rhoads, C.P. Nitrogen Musards in the Treatsrent of Neoplastic Disease. Iournal of 0re
American Medical Association 13 I :656{5E, L946..
.1992.
17. Pechura, Constance M., and David P. Rall (Editors). Veterans at Risk; The Health Effects of
Mustard Gas and Lewisite. Nationd Academy Press, Washington,
D.C.
lE. U.S. Army Field Manual E-2E5. Treatment of Chemicd Agent Casualties
Military Chemicd Injuriec. FeDruary 1990.
19. Requena,
L.,
et
1993.
and Conventional
20. Drasch, Gustav, A al. Concenration of Mustard Gas [Bis(2{hloroahyl Sulfide] in ne Tissues
of a Victim of a Vesicant Exposure. Journal of Forensic Ssience 32(Q:1788-1793, 1987.
21. Freitag, Lutz, NosratFirusian, George Stamatis, and Dieer Greschuchna. The Role of Broncttoscopy in Pulmonary Complications Due to Mustard Gas Inhalation. Chest 100(fl:1a36
1441, tggl.
22. Momeni,
23. Aasted, Annet, et al. Mustard Gas: Clinical, Toxicological, ud Mutagenic Aspects Based on
Modern Experienee. Annds of Plastic Surgery 19:330-335, 1987.
24. Fasth, Auli, and Bo Sorbo. Protective Effects of Thiosulfate and Metabolic Thiosulfate Precursors Against Toxicity of Niuogen Mustard (IINJ. Biochemicd Pharmacology 22: 1337-1351,
t913.
25. Field, J.8., A. Mireles, an<l E.C. Dolendo. Reversal of Nitrogen Mustard Intoxication by a
Serotonin Antagonist. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine
Itl:l-3,1962.
26. Bennen, George MacDonald, and Btith Muriel lVincop. Some Derivatives of Monothioahylene
Glycol. Journal of the Chemical Soci*y ll9:lt6G'lt&,1921.
A-2
27. Davies, J.S.H., and A.E. Oxford. Formation of Sulphonium Chlorides and Unsanrrated
Subsuncos by the Action of }Vater rnd Aquous Alcoholic Potash on p, p-Dichlorodiethyl
Sulphide. Journal of the C:hcrnical Sociay t2+216,1931.
28. Glasson, E.f., et al. New Organic Sulfur Veslcams, Part IV. l:2-Di-(2-chloroethylthio) Ether
and It Andogues. Journal of the Chemical Society (tondon) pp 4446.
Jan-June, 19E4.
29. Samuel, John B., Elwin C. Penski and lohn J. Callahan. Physicd Properties of Standard Agents
(U). AfrcSL-SP-83015, iune 1983. CONFIDENTTAL.
30. Koblin, Abraham. Field Sampling and Analysis of Agent Q. Interim Report{RLR 513, Army
Chemical Center, Maryland, Decernber, 1955, ADOM169.
31. \[oodward F.N. New Organic Sulphur Vesicants. Part I. 2:2-DF@+hloroethyltrio) die&yl
Ether. Journal of the Chemical Society (Iondon) Pages 35-38, January-June, 1984.
32. Lichterutadter, Manfred, and James D. Moneymalrer. Preparation and Proposed Semicontinuous
Process of Production of Agent Q. Formal Report CRLR 552, Army Chemical Center,
Maryland, April, 1955, ADO93393.
33. Reeves, A.M., et al. Process Development for Agent Q. Interim Report CRLR 490, Army
Chemical Center, Maryland, June 1955, AD 066179.
34. U.S. Army Service Forces Ofiice. Standudization of Persistent Agent, HT. Chief of the
Chemical Warfare Sewices, Item 1342. DPG Accession #526608.
35. U.S. National Research Council. Disposal of Chernical Munitions and Agents. National
Academy Press, Washington D.C, 1984.
II.
37. Tomlinson, Gretchen I., and Aryeh H. Samuel. Literanrre Survey of Physical and Chemical
Prcperties of Agents VX, GD, HD and HL. ARCSL-CR-t0051, fuly, 1980, AD8050375.
1953, AD0@523.
39. Peters, R.A., H.M. Sinclair, ud R.H.S. Thompson. An Andysis of the Inhibition of Pyruvate
Oxidation by Anenicals in Relation to the Enzyme Thmry of Vesication. Biochernical Journal
40:513-524, 1946.
A-3
\V. British Anti-Lewisite (BAL), The Classic Heavy Metal Antidote. Clinical
:215-222,
197 2.
5
Toxicology
S.K.
42. Boyle, Douglas G. A Selected Review of Thickonod Agent Programs, 1939 to 1976 (U).
DPGR-T-I3OA, U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground, Dugway, Uteh, ADC0L4O52, October
1977. S1ECRET
M., and Marjorie F. Buckles. Mixtures of CV/ Agents for Use In Cold
Weather. CRLR 178 Army Chemical Center, Maryland, July, 1953, AD014882.
d.
4.
Detection, Identifi-
Gander, Terry
X[I,
34.
l99l-92.
Jane's Information
48. Mills, Eugene B., et al. Field Evaluation, Decontamination Capabilities Chemical Units and
Teams (DECAP CHUTE) Volume
Find Report DPG-FR-CI40A, June, 1977, ADC010850.
t.
49. Yurow, Harvey W., and George T. Davis. Decontamination and Disposal Methods for Chemical
Agents - A Literature Survey. ARCL-TR-81080. U.S. Army Armament Research and
Development Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, November 1982, AD 8069586.
Lowe, Harry N., and Don C. Lindsten. Removd of CBR Contaminants from Water. Military
Medicine l2l :330-335, 1975.
51. U.S. Army Dugu,ay Proving Ground, Dugway,
L.
A4
DO C U M E NT U/VCLASS I F I ED IJ PO
54. Brooks, Marquerite 8., and Gmrge A. Parker. Incineration and $rolysis of Severd Agents and
Related Chemical Materials Contained in Identification SAs. ARCSL-TR-79040, U.S. Army
Armament Research and Development Cornmand, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, October,
1979 ADB042888L.
A-5
APPENDIX
STATE DEPARTMENI
ATTNr Im Mn. CROCKER)
WASHINGTON, DC 2(820
ATIII:
ATIN: ATSILABCM
COMMANDER IN CHIEF
U.S. SPACE COMMAND
ATTN: 5P.131(MAJ BL ND)
R,@M 3crra
DC 20t01-309t
WASI|INGTON,
PETERSON AIIB,
CO t0fl+5000
COMMANDEN. IN CHIET
U.S, SPECIAL OPEMTIONS COMMAND
ATIN:
DIRPCTOR
DEFENSE I\ruCLEAR, AG ENCY
ATTN:
5tO1 TELEGRAPH RD
NORTMCPHERSON GA 3q'30
ALEXANTIRTA,
VA
FC.!3-TN
2231G339t
COMMANDER
DIRECTON,
DETENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
JSOC
ATTN:
PAN.,A
ATTN:
DBIB:! 20340{5t4
FORT BRAGG.
NC
II3O7.5OOO
WASHINGTON, DC 2()3(}1{E3
IIEADQUAN,TERS
DIRECTON,
ATTN: SARILZBA
WASHTNGTON, D.C. r03l0
WASIIINGTON, DC 20505
usA, cBDcoM
ATTII AJ}{SCBED (CPT WARREN)
DIRECTOR,
ARi{ED FORCES MEDICAL INTELLIC ENCE
DUILDING E.5IO1
ABERDEEN PR,OVINC GROUND,
ATTN:
AFX{IC-LST
FORT DETRICK, FREDERICK.
MD
MD 2t70r-500{
210rG5423
aaaa
HQ USEURCOM
UMT
HQDA (DN!{O-SWC)
ATTN:
AFO
AE 09lr&{209
HQDA (DATIGFDB)
USCINCPAC
ATTN:
ATril:
JS13
BOX 6.1015
CAMP Hlr.
${rTH. HI
WASIilNGTON, DC 2031G{K30
96861-{015
COMMANDEN, IN CHIEF
U.S. ATLAIiITIC COMMAND
Affll:
HQDA (DALGSUG)
COL AHERN
PENTACON, R,M TC57ll
AtTt{:
J33CW
AVE, STE
NORnOLK, VA B5Sr-2a88
156:I MITSCHER
COL DOESBUnG
PENTACON, RM 3C319
wAsrrrNGToN. Dc r0310-{xrs0
2OO
HQDA (DASG-HCI}D)
ATfi:
HEADQUARTERS
uss()urIIcoM
ATTIII: SCSG
UMT
'20{l-325t
ilQDA (SARD.ZCS)
ATTNI MRBOBHARES
APIO
1175
AA
34{Xl3
PENTAGON, RM.3D'1TI
WAS]IIINGTON, D.C. 02310
B-1
COMMANDEN
COMMAND
ATril: ArcD{B MR. H SKINS)
FORTMONnOE,VA nl63l
COMMANI'EN.
U.S. ANMY MATEilELCOMMAIYD
ATTN: AIUCGB (Mn. XOGEBI
S(IOI EISENNO}T'ER AVE
U.S. ARI}IY
COMMANDER
U.S. ARMY TANT.AUTOMOTIYE COMMAND
A}tStA-Nn &TC NOTEBI,()OIV0
ATII{;
wARnEN,tril at39-3000
COMMANDER
USA SOC
ATTNr AIDP.NB
FORT
ALEXANDRIA, YA 2I333{XIO1
COTIIMANDEX,
coMMANItER
U.S. ANMY EUROPE
ATTN: AEAGC.NC{
AIIO AE 000fa4rG?
COMMANDER
us. FoRcEsronEA
ATTN: lru 3-Pl{
AFO AP 96'11900T0
COMMANDER
U.s. FORCESJATAITI
ATTN: J3
ANO AP 963'8
coMM NDER
U.S.
PACIrIC COMMAND
^TMY
ATTN:
APOP-NC
ATI.G.MU
noRTsHAFTEn,Ht 968tt
colr{MANlrER,
u.s. AnMY sot TII
mlT 710,
ATTN: SOOP-T
AFO AA 3'{P+s(lOO
U.S. ARMY TEST AND
ATTtt:
'I01G5"3
HEAIIQUAnTERS
U.S. ARMY TNANSEORTATION CENTEN
AT[N: ATZF-P[T-N, NBC BRANCH CEIEF
F1ORT EUSTIS,
VA
2037+5083
COMMANDER
U.s. ANMY AVIATTON CENTER
ATII:
ATZ?{DMS
FonT RUCKER,
At
3636:,
COMMANDER
ATTN:
IAITAC-RXW
wAstIINcTON, DC
'01?,LS085
COMMANDER
U.S.ANMYRONHGNSCIENCEANDTDCHNOTOGYCEN-
EYALUATIONCOMTT{AND
AMSTF,SI.F
AMSTE-TA.L
AMSIT-TA.H
AMSTF.ST
ATERDEEN IBOYING GRO['ND,
MD
'IO{X'.5UIS
DIRECTOR
U.S. ANMY NESEAXCH LABOMTORY
ATTNr All!il,L${
ABE;R,IIEEN PR,oVING GRot,ND,
MD 2TOG'-5001
ATTNr
IRAGG,I{C 2BO-5'IN
TEN
ATTN: RCII-ROSEI{E
220 SEYEITm{
STnEEf NE
CHA$IITTE$nLLE, yA 2290r-$95
COMMANDEN
U.S. ANMY NATICT NESEARCH,
DEYELOPMENT
ATTN:
ANI} ENGINEERING
CENTEN
SATNC-AA5|IIS
SATNC.IPS MR. ROLL) (SOr9I
SATNC.U MN. CT.oYER)
S TNC.YSA (DR. nOBERTSOTO
sATlYc.w.rs OsT LT RICITAnDSI
KANSAS STREET
NArtcK, MA 017(l.5000
DIRECTOR
LADORATONY
COMMANDEN USA'FTSSWC
DIRECTORATE ATTN: ATSI{D{S (MAI rul{ITERBURc)
ATIN: AMSRLEB-MM (Il. HARnAH)
FOI,T BR cG, I{C tt3t}7-S(n0
U.S. ARITTY R,ESEANCH
Mr]
'rUE-5001
COMMANDER
COMMANDEN,
U.S. AnIUY MEITICAL BESEARCH AND
DEYEION/IENT COMM.TITID
ATIN: SGruLH,E
roxr DEf,Hcx, FnEDEnlcK, MD 2l70t-S0t2
ATTN:
':llgl
B-2
DOCUMENT U'VCLASS
IF
COMMAT{DEN
U.S. ARII{Y COMBAT SYSTEMS TEST ACTIYITY
COMMANDEN
U.s. ARMY OPERATIONS EVALUATION
COMMAND
ATIT{: CSTF.ECS (CPT WHITEIIURS'D
ATI?{: STEC$AA-IS
COMMAI{DER
COMMANDEN.
U.S. ARI}fY MEDICAL RESE^TCH INSiTITUTE
OF CHEITIICAL DET'ENSE
AflNr
SGRII.W.RO
COMMAITIDER
'l0ro-5ar5
..
ACI'IYITY
COMMAITI'EB
U.S. ANMY MEDICAL NESEARCII INSTITUTE
OF INrECTIOUS DISEASES
RORT DErruCKr FnEDEnICK, MD 21101
AT[N: AIllbfI)'ED
{Erl
LEXTNGT{)N,XY
COMMANDER
U.S. ARMY OPERATIONAL TEST AITID EVALUATION
AGENCY
COMMANDER
AJT,TEDD CENTER AND SCHOOL
ATTN: HSA.CDB
ATTN: TDTEIA
FIORT BELYOTR,,
COMMANDER,
COMMANI'EN
ATlTtl: A[.K&TI'.[N
ATTN:
noRTMOmOE V^2:tdlr
COMDT USACMIS
ATIN:
VA
22060
ATCILSL
ATCDS
PRESIDENT
U.S. ARMY AIREONNEBOAND
ATZITI{M-INB 0 Copic
ATTN:
ATXA.BDT/BDP
FONT BMGG. NC
'807
HEADQUARTERS
COMMANDANT
U.S. ARMY FIELD ARTILLERY SCNOOL
ATrN:
ASOF-SFA-SC(NBC)
RORT CNT|PDELL, KY, O2;t!5000
ATTN:
ATSF-TA-SS
rroRT SILL, OK 7350$5600
COMMANDER
EIGIITII U.s. ARItf,Y,
COMMANDANT
U.S. ARMY AVIATION IOGISTICS SCH(X)L
ATT}{: ATS+IfD'M
(Jl. MCCORMACT)
noRT EUSTIS, VA 2360CSal6
AnoAP
96205{009
U$II(
ATIN:
NIIIU,$AET
REDSTONE AR,SENAL. AL
SACJ-PI{
HEADQUARIERS
U.S. ARII{Y ELElllEI{T, SIIAPE
CHEIT{ICAL OmCEn
AFO AE.ID7(E
EXPCUTIVE DIRECTON
USAMC IOGTSTIC SUPFORT ACTIVITY
AT[N:
ATII{:
3tt9&7{5li
COMMANDER
DIRE/CTON
U.S. ANMY HARRY DIAIT{OND I.AEORATONY
ATTN: SIGHI>'DEOP
,t00
FTOWDEn
ADELPHT, MD
i/flLL ROAI)
roTtllr9
COMMANDEN,
U.S. ARMY TNFANTNY SCHOOL
AK) AE
ATSII{DM-F
ATSI4DM
FORT BENhIII{G, GA tl90$5,afl)
COMMANDER,
I COf,PS, rDRT LEWIS
ATIN:
B-3
COMMANDER
XYIIIAINBONNECORPSANIIFORTBRAGG
AT[N: AfiZADN
FOnT BRAGG, NC 2tl07.s{n0
.G
COMMANDERT
arDooANDnonTcARsoN
ATlll: AEID4;C
rrORT CARSON, CO tolDl3
COMMANDER,
?TH IIiIFAIiITRY DIVISION Ar{D FOBT OND
ATlll: AIiZW.GC4M
AffN:
AFyACML
FORTHOOD,TX ?63t5{10r
..t.
HQ U$TTF,'CEX
UMT 3(FO,IOX
AFO
rO
AE0e0r+S00t
BQ EACATTCETm
COMMANDEn
HICrI|A[i
AFB,
lil g6tll-54r'
HQ AHSTINKTC
tuAsulNcroN, Dc
2033Gtl
l0
COMMAI{TIER
HQDA AI}|C/CEOP
5U, A STREEI
(CHEMICAL}
FOI.T STEWAnT, GA 3r:ilCsoflt
COMMANDER, TI' INF DIY
ATTN: AErV-EG{C, CHDMIG L OmCEn
AFO AE 00036
CoMMANDER
DIVISTON CHEMICAL,
2ND AnMOnED DMSTON
. ATTN: ttC WIITBAA
." IrORT llOOD, TEXAS 765'1G5200
- COMMAI{DER
T DAIRDORNE DMSTON
. ATIN: AFVC{M
FORT BNAGG, NC
't3(l7.5TOO
COMMAITIDEN, lstr ANMD DIV
ATIN: AETV-TIC-N
CMN
AFO AE
"I Olrr-2108
CoMMANITER
IOTST AINBONTIE DIV (AASLT)
ATIN: AI:ZEPII}I.C
FORT CAIIIPEELL, l(Y .Urr3-5ln0
COMMAI{IIER
zDCML EATT LTON
ATIT{: CHEMICALOffiCER
FOIT HOOIT, TX 763,aa
coMMAl{DEn
IO|TN MOUNTAIN DTVISION
ATII: AEZS.CML
FORT DnUM, NY ilt602-t023
ATI?{: AEZP4W
scoTT
TIQ ACC'CEXA
noDtNs ArD,
UMT
ca
3109&165
IIQ AHC/DOXX
sAN ANTON|O. TX ?82algxl0
rIQ ArMC/CEOO
ar25 I,()ctSTlCS AYE, SInTE 7
WRIGIIT.PATTERSON AFB. OII
$'3}5'{5
AIJCFDA
ATTN: DR. CLYDE n. IEPII)GI,E
WR,TCHT.PATTERSON
AID OII
'5.lI}?O$
HQ AHOC/CEX
N,
325{4|C'73
AFSPACECOM/CEFO
ISO VAT{DENBERG ST
SIITE U05
PETERSON
AFq CO $91+als0
AITN: ANR/DOYN
EU}TENDORT AFB,
AK
9930c5000
ANGRC/CDOE
FETCHET AVENT E
AII{ITREWS AFB ItilD
$m
'llttl.sls?
COMMANDEN
HHC,2d TNFANTnY DMSTON
APO
AfI, IL 522,$fi22
B-4
N/J3CBN
sr.rrrE r0r-129
CIIEYENNE MTN ArB,
COMMANDER IN CHI
IIQ NORAD
r NONAI} ROAD
PEARL
co $9ra{pr
HQ
HARIOE,III
96t60.t000
AlrtsA-[trr
T$
1033r-5106
AETC'CET{O
RANDOLPB ABc !X ?t1gL82r
HQ
266
TSLAITTD
r STnEET WEST
sAN DIEGO,
CA
9zlsS-51tr1
USI|FAWC
I8/TS
TXCO
$rrE{00
EGLIN AFB, Ft 32542.ffi1
DFO
203 W. D AVE,
rFo AP 9660r{rcr
HQ
N, 3$"S{ts
3()O
ATICESIJITXD
.III
32{0}-5319
FASTC/TATH
HEBBLE CNEEK RD
ATTN: Nl,
NOBFOLK, VA 2:t5TI
OH
45433{sll8
CoMMANDER
U.S. ATLANNC H,EEf, (N7)
l56jl i,llTSClIER AVE SlrITE rtO
IISC/YAC
rvEsr RoAD
NoRrroLK,
,701
DROOKS
9660r
COMMANDEN,THTru' N,EET
ASC/YOX
EGLIN AFB,
AF
Am, TX 7t
vA
23551.1487
35.5000
ITSC/IN
TX
R,D
?p35-5317
BR@KSAtrB. TX
7t235.gMO
SIII{ CIIEIiINAULT
BR.OOTS AFB,
AUXPT
13I08TII ST.
NoRnoLK, YA. t35t1-5150
3{,ll}
LOWnY ArB, CO
NORI\OLr, YA l355r.2ay
TCHTG/TTMXILD
t023G5000
HQ AIIIC/CBOD
g}7AST.
SCOTT AFB, IL 52225-50t2
HQ
NAYALAIRSYSTEMSCOMMAND
ATTN: 'AIR-Sl6arD (MB. l(EN GOm
U'I JEFIDRSON DAVTS HWY
AIUC/XPQS
SCOTT DR,., UMT
RM
"O'
COMMANDER
13'
scolT
AFB,
rLL
WASTIINGTON,
3IJ
'01616160
COMMANI'ING OITICER
NAVAL Atr. WAnFARECENTD,n
ATTN: CODE SR-2,t OIS DEBOMII DN{IEIS)
r.AXEHURgt, NJ 0MIL5m0
6,,223-330,
/DXD
HQ AnCE/S
r39 BARNES DRIVE
TYNDALL AFB, Ft
32(t+5319
COMMANDER
....
,,0
SI]OYALL STREET
ALEXANDRTA, YA 2r332-rt00
NAVAL OPEnATTONS
CODE lrlt6l), RIil aUiltT
omcE oF cHtEF oF
AflN:
DC
B-5
COMM
" tt
T{DER
NAYALSEASYSTEMSCOMMAND
ATril:
ENATSXYI
JT'NG
DC zlXi6r-510r
fllt
{ MR S.
SEA
SEA 0565 (MB. P.
WASIIINCffiN,
COMMAI{DANT
U.$ MARINE CORPS
ATTI{:
AFW R-P
WASIIINGTON,IIC an3fll
COMMAITII'ER
COMMAND
92155-5000
COMMANDING OrTICEB
MAnINE AIRCRAFT GnOUP 19 ($3,NBC)
CA
sAN DTEGO,
S:T,IRGERY
ATTN: MEI).OZC
NATNY
'T5'3
DEPARTMENT
WASITINGMN, DC
NT{F ATI4IIIITIC
ItIgW RIVER, NC
COMMAI{IIING OrrICEN
MAruNE AIRCRAFT GROI'P I' (93'NBC)
,D MARIITIE AINCIAFT WING, NUF ATLANTIC
'tr17'.5I'O
CoMMAI{DER
,ts
cHERnY noNT, Nc
DIVISTON
6118 (IIELLITAN
WARMIMSTER. PA It9?'
COMMANI}INGOMCER
MAf,lNE AIRCRAFT GROI
dNCRAFT
ATrN:
CODE
,D
Ngw nrvDR, NC
'8545
COMMANDING OFFTCEN
MARINE AIRCNAFT GROI'P 31 (93'NBC)
T$
BYRNE)
CODEE.5I MR. YENCHA}
coDE e$ MR. FOMpE[r)
CODE E5O OlR. J. HONT
CODE DI3 O{R.
VA
DAHI.GREN.
'I"&SOflI
COMMAI{DING OrTICEX
NAVAL TRATMI{G SYSTEMS CENTEN
COMMANI'ING OTTICEN
MANINE AIR CONTROL GROT'P 2t ($3/NBC)
2D M ruNE ATNCRAFT WING, FMF ATT,TNTIC
coDE 16:l
P.o. Box
o. Fn r{z}
r,35O NESEARCII
oR,LANIIO,
DIRECTOR,,
P 16 6i'3rNBC
MARIT{E ilNCNAFT'NTING, T'I}IF ATI,AITIIC
PARI(WAY
n',,G3224
ONI
ROAD
'l30r
WASIIINGTON D.C. T0:t95
COMMANDING OrTICER
MARINENR WrNG TTE DQUARTERS
SQUADRON' (S3/NDC)
MARINE AruCRATT WING, EVIF, ATI"ANIIC
Frr[NG OTflCER
NAVALRESEARCH LABORATORY
coMM
CHERny ponn.
'I}
'0375.5000
COMMANDING OFNCER
ATT.iI: N & MCRC
D MEADOW STREET, P.O. BOX a930
CHATTAI{(X)GA, TN 37{qt
CENTER
DIVISXON
MEYERHOFT
nmn
206?M30a
ATrN:
CArLtp
COM
AfIT{:
G3/NBC
9r1t8
CHARGE
DETACHMENT
OFrICER, IN
NAVAL RESEARCH LAE
CBD
ABEBDEEN PROVING GnOUND,
G3/NBC
COMMANDTNGGENERAL
FLEET MANINE FONCES ATI,/INTTC
CA
290{
COMMANDING GENERAL
TLEET MARINE T'ORCES PACIFIC
COMMANDEN
$T"
SC
COMMANDI}rc GENENAL
MANINE CORPS COMBAT DEVEI.OPMEM COMMANI)
ATTN: (CwO BIEDEMENDER) C .L3
l0{2 DROADWAY ST, ST ITE t7
QUANT|CO, YA
'284-5021
COMMANDEN
NAYAL NR TVARFARE
AIRCRAFT
CODE Siy 7lA MR Ct RT
DATT XENT
MD
EOX
sAN DIEOO
'tI'3
COMMANDING OITICER
ATTI{: OM 232:1
SUTL/U{D
gr9
CIIERRY PIOTNT, NC
USILIC
ATTN:
MD
'l0lc53r"t
B-6
MII
IIOOS
JCP-I' DPG
DOCUMENT UNCLASS IFIED IJPON REPRODUCTION
COMMANDER
U.S. AR}fY DUGTYAY PROVING GROTJNI)
COMMANDER
MARCORSYSCOM
ATTN:
ATTN: Aril
QUANTICO, VA
STEDP-JOEA P
2rB+50r0
COMMANDING GET{ERAL
2D MARINE DIV TII{F
ATIN: NBC OFNCEN
PSC BOX 20003
NC It!I'O
COMMANDING GENERAL
2ND MARINE AIRCRAFT WINC
2D MAW, r'MIANT
MCAS CHERN,Y FOINT,
NC 2t533
DIRECTOR
TIr{rIiNT
CAII? GEIGER
JACKSOT{VILLE
NC 2t3rr-5701
COMMANDING OTTICER
MANINE WING SUPFORT SQUADRON 27T (93/NBC
2D MAR,INE AIRCR,AFT WING, t}IF, ATLANTIC
MCAS CIERRY
Poll{r,
NC r8s33
COMMANDING OFfICER,
MAnINE WING SLTPPORT SQUADRON 2r2 (S3/NBC)
2D MARINE NRCRAFT WING, ['[{F, ATLANTIC
MCAS NEW R,IVER, NC 2T545
COMMANDING OrTICER
COMMAIIDING OITICER
MARINE WING ST'PFORT SQUADRON 273 ($3/NBC)
2D MARINE AIN,CR,AFT WING, ITI{F, ATLANTIC
MCAS BEAUToRT, SC 2990+6035
aaaa
cofts)
STEDP-JOIII (6 conia)
COMMANDTNG GENERAL
II MARINE EXDEDITIONARY FORCE
ATTI{: G.3/NBC, PSC BOX 200t0
CAIWP LE JEITNE NC,8!li0-s/$l
CNT{P LE JEIJNE,
STEDP{O
STEDP.JOD
coia)
CAIUER,ON STATION
ALEXANDRIA,VA 22314
DIRECTOR
CEI{TERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL
ATTN: LOGGING CONTROL OmICER - l/8413
(for ASST DIR, EDWIN K. GRAY)
ATLANTA, GA 30333
B-7