Sie sind auf Seite 1von 115

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 27

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Michael K. Friedland (SBN 157,217)


michael.friedland@knobbe.com
Ali S. Razai (SBN 246,922)
ali.razai@knobbe.com
Samantha Y. Hsu (SBN 285,853)
samantha.hsu@knobbe.com
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 760-0404
Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OAKLEY, INC.

8
9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

OAKLEY, INC., a Washington


corporation,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff,
v.
NEW SOUTH BAY TRADING, INC., a
California corporation d/b/a
CALIFORNIA WHOLESALE
SUNGLASSES and d/b/a TRIO
TRADING
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

MMA BGS
Civil Action No. '16CV1730
______________
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
INFRINGEMENT

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 27

Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (Oakley) hereby complains of New South Bay

Trading, Inc. d/b/a California Wholesale Sunglasses and d/b/a Trio Trading

(Defendant) and alleges as follows:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE


1.

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims in this

action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271 and 281 and 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338,

as these claims arise under the patent laws of the United States.
2.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because

Defendant has a continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this

10

judicial district including by selling and offering for sale infringing products in

11

this judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement in this

12

judicial district, including but not limited to selling infringing eyewear directly

13

to consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of

14

commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district,

15

which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to

16

Oakleys claim.

17

3.

18

Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b),

1391(d), and 1400(b).

19

THE PARTIES
4.

20

Plaintiff Oakley is a corporation organized and existing under the

21

laws of the State of Washington, having its principal place of business at One

22

Icon, Foothill Ranch, California 92610.


5.

23

Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

24

Defendant New South Bay Trading, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing

25

under the laws of the State of California, having its principal place of business

26

at 605 South Milliken Avenue, Suite E, Ontario, California 91761.

27

///

28

///
-1-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 3 of 27

6.

Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendant New South Bay Trading, Inc. owns and operates California

Wholesale Sunglasses and Trio Trading.

4
5

7.

Oakley is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that

Defendant has committed the acts alleged herein within this judicial district.

6
7

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
8.

Oakley has been actively engaged in the manufacture and sale of

high quality eyewear since at least 1985.

retailer of several lines of eyewear that have enjoyed substantial success and are

10
11

Oakley is the manufacturer and

protected by various intellectual property rights owned by Oakley.


9.

On June 5, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office

12

(U.S.P.T.O.) duly and lawfully issued United States Design Patent

13

No. D661,339 (D339 Patent), titled EYEGLASS. Oakley is the owner by

14

assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D339 Patent. A true and correct

15

copy of the D339 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

16

10.

On November 25, 2008, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

17

United

18

EYEGLASSES COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all

19

right, title, and interest in the D443 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D443

20

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

21

States

11.

Design

Patent

No. D581,443

(D443

Patent),

titled

On November 25, 2008, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

22

United States Design Patent No. D581,444 (D444 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

23

COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

24

interest in the D444 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D444 Patent is

25

attached hereto as Exhibit C.

26

12.

On May 20, 2008, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

27

States Design Patent No. D569,412 (D412 Patent), titled EYEGLASS AND

28

EYEGLASS COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right,


-2-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 4 of 27

title, and interest in the D412 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D412

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.


13.

On January 1, 2008, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

United States Design Patent No. D558,816 (D816 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all

right, title, and interest in the D816 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D816

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit E.


14.

On August 7, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

States Design Patent No. D548,269 (D269 Patent), titled EYEGLASSES.

10

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D269

11

Patent. A true and correct copy of the D269 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit

12

F.
15.

13

On December 29, 2015, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

14

United States Design Patent No. D746,368 (D368 Patent), titled SET OF

15

EYEGLASS COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right,

16

title, and interest in the D368 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D368

17

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit G.


16.

18

On June 1, 2010, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

19

States Design Patent No. D616,919 (D919 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

20

FRONT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in

21

the D919 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D919 Patent is attached hereto

22

as Exhibit H.
17.

23

On November 29, 2011, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

24

United

States

Design

Patent

No. D649,579

(D579

Patent),

titled

25

EYEGLASS.

26

interest in the D579 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D579 Patent is

27

attached hereto as Exhibit I.

28

///

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

-3-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 5 of 27

18.

On November 6, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

United States Design Patent No. D554,689 (D689 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

FRAME. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in

the D689 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D689 Patent is attached hereto

as Exhibit J.
19.

On August 3, 2010, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

States Design Patent No. D620,970 (D970 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

COMPONENT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and

interest in the D970 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D970 Patent is

10

attached hereto as Exhibit K.


20.

11

On February 23, 2010, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued

12

United States Design Patent No. D610,604 (D604 Patent), titled EYEGLASS

13

AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all

14

right, title, and interest in the D604 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D604

15

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit L.


21.

16

On July 31, 2007, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

17

States Design Patent No. D547,793 (D793 Patent), titled EYEGLASSES.

18

Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D793

19

Patent. A true and correct copy of the D793 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit

20

M.

21

22.

On May 8, 2012, the U.S.P.T.O. duly and lawfully issued United

22

States Design Patent No. D659,182 (D182 Patent), titled EYEGLASS AND

23

EYEGLASS COMPONENT. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right,

24

title, and interest in the D182 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D182

25

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit N.

26

23.

Oakley has provided the public with constructive notice of its

27

patent rights, including Oakleys rights in the D339 Patent, D443 Patent, D444

28

Patent, D412 Patent, D816 Patent, D269 Patent, D368 Patent, D919 Patent,
-4-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 6 of 27

D579 Patent, D689 Patent, D970 Patent, D604 Patent, D793 Patent, and D182

Patent (collectively, the Asserted Patents) pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287.


24.

Defendant manufactures, uses, sells, offers for sale, and/or imports

into the United States eyewear that infringes Oakleys intellectual property

rights.
25.

Defendants acts complained of herein have caused Oakley to

suffer irreparable injury to its business.

substantial loss unless and until Defendant is preliminarily and permanently

enjoined from its wrongful actions complained of herein.

10

CLAIM FOR RELIEF

11
12
13

Oakley will continue to suffer

26.

(Patent Infringement)
(35 U.S.C. 271)
Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-25 of

this Complaint as if set forth fully herein.

14

27.

This is a claim for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271.

15

28.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

16

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D339 Patent by

17

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

18

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

19

the claim of the D339 Patent, including for example, Defendants CW6S044

20

model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on

21

the website https://www.californiawholesalesunglasses.com/ by Defendant

22

under its d/b/a California Wholesale Sunglasses.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
-5-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 7 of 27

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

CW6S044

U.S. Patent No. D661,339

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

29.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D339 Patent were

11

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

12

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

13

in the D339 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

14

the eyewear industry and Defendants CW6S044 model sunglasses are a nearly

15

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

16

willful and intentional infringement of the D339 Patent. Defendant infringed

17

the D339 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

18

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

19

constituted infringement of the D339 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

20

of the D339 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

21

industry.

22

30.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

23

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D443 Patent by

24

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

25

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

26

the claim of the D443 Patent, including for example, Defendants CW4S511

27

model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on

28

the website https://www.californiawholesalesunglasses.com/ by Defendant


-6-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 8 of 27

under its d/b/a California Wholesale Sunglasses and Defendants 16S061 and

14S511 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for

sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio

Trading.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

CW4S511

U.S. Patent No. D581,443

7
8
9
10
11
16S061

12
13
14
15
16
17

14S511

18
19
20
21
22
23

31.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D443 Patent were

24

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

25

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

26

in the D443 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

27

the eyewear industry and Defendants CW4S511, 16S061, and 14S511 model

28

sunglasses are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly,


-7-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 9 of 27

Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D443

Patent.

Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant

should have known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D443 Patent.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D443 Patent were not consistent with

the standards of commerce for its industry.

32.

Defendant infringed the D443 Patent with reckless disregard of

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D444 Patent by

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

10

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

11

the claim of the D444 Patent, including for example, Defendants CW4S511

12

model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on

13

the website https://www.californiawholesalesunglasses.com/ by Defendant

14

under its d/b/a California Wholesale Sunglasses and Defendants 14S511 model

15

sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on the

16

website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio Trading.

17

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

18

CW4S511

U.S. Patent No. D581,444

19
20
21
22
23

14S511

24
25
26
27
28
-8-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 10 of 27

33.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D444 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

in the D444 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry and Defendants CW4S511 and 14S511 model sunglasses

are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants

actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D444 Patent.

Defendant infringed the D444 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent

rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have

10

known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D444 Patent.

11

Defendants acts of infringement of the D444 Patent were not consistent with

12

the standards of commerce for its industry.


34.

13

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

14

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D412 Patent by

15

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

16

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

17

the claim of the D412 Patent, including for example, Defendants CW4S511

18

model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on

19

the website https://www.californiawholesalesunglasses.com/ by Defendant

20

under its d/b/a California Wholesale Sunglasses and Defendants 14S511 model

21

sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on the

22

website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio Trading.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
-9-

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 11 of 27

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

CW4S511

U.S. Patent No. D569,412

3
4
5
6
7
14S511

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

35.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D412 Patent were

15

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

16

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

17

in the D412 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

18

the eyewear industry and Defendants CW4S511 and 14S511 model sunglasses

19

are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants

20

actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D412 Patent.

21

Defendant infringed the D412 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent

22

rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have

23

known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D412 Patent.

24

Defendants acts of infringement of the D412 Patent were not consistent with

25

the standards of commerce for its industry.

26

36.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

27

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D368 Patent by

28

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
- 10 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 12 of 27

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

the claim of the D368 Patent, including for example, Defendants 16S061 and

14S405 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for

sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio

Trading.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

16S061

U.S. Patent No. D746,368

8
9
10
11
12
14S405

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

37.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D368 Patent were

21

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

22

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

23

in the D368 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

24

the eyewear industry and Defendants 16S061 and 14S405 model sunglasses are

25

each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants

26

actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D368 Patent.

27

Defendant infringed the D368 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent

28

rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have


- 11 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 13 of 27

known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D368 Patent.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D368 Patent were not consistent with

the standards of commerce for its industry.

38.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D579 Patent by

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

the claim of the D579 Patent, including for example, Defendants 15S909,

15S910 and 14S406 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or

10

offered for sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its

11

d/b/a Trio Trading.

12

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

13

15S909

U.S. Patent No. D649,579

14
15
16
17
18

15S910

19
20
21
22
23

14S406

24
25
26
27
28
- 12 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 14 of 27

39.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D579 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

in the D579 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry and Defendants 15S909, 15S910 and 14S406 model

sunglasses are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly,

Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D579

Patent.

Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant

10

should have known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D579 Patent.

11

Defendants acts of infringement of the D579 Patent were not consistent with

12

the standards of commerce for its industry.


40.

13

Defendant infringed the D579 Patent with reckless disregard of

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

14

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D816 Patent by

15

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

16

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

17

the claim of the D816 Patent, including for example, Defendants CW6S041

18

and CW6P015 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or

19

offered for sale on the website https://www.californiawholesalesunglasses.com/

20

by Defendant under its d/b/a California Wholesale Sunglasses, and Defendants

21

16P015, 16S041, and 16S042 model sunglasses as shown below, which were

22

sold and/or offered for sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by

23

Defendant under its d/b/a Trio Trading.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
- 13 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 15 of 27

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

CW6S041

U.S. Patent No. D558,816

3
4
5
6
7

CW6P015

8
9
10
11
12

16P015

13
14
15
16
16S041

17
18
19
20
21

16S042

22
23
24
25
26
27

///

28

///
- 14 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 16 of 27

41.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D816 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

in the D816 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry and Defendants CW6S041, CW6P015, 16P015, 16S041,

and 16S042 model sunglasses are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys

design.

infringement of the D816 Patent. Defendant infringed the D816 Patent with

reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so

10

obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constituted

11

infringement of the D816 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement of the D816

12

Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
42.

13

Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

14

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D269 Patent by

15

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

16

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

17

the claim of the D269 Patent, including for example, Defendants CWSITF01

18

model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on

19

the website https://www.californiawholesalesunglasses.com/ by Defendant

20

under its d/b/a California Wholesale Sunglasses, and Defendants ITF3001

21

model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on

22

the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio

23

Trading.

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
- 15 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 17 of 27

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

CWSITF01

U.S. Patent No. D548,269

3
4
5
6
7
8

ITF3001

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

43.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D269 Patent were

16

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

17

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

18

in the D269 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

19

the eyewear industry and Defendants CWSITF01 and ITF3001 model

20

sunglasses are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly,

21

Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D269

22

Patent.

23

Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant

24

should have known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D269 Patent.

25

Defendants acts of infringement of the D269 Patent were not consistent with

26

the standards of commerce for its industry.

27

///

28

///

Defendant infringed the D269 Patent with reckless disregard of

- 16 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 18 of 27

44.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D919 Patent by

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

the claim of the D919 Patent, including for example, Defendants 15S907,

14S411, and 16S039 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or

offered for sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its

d/b/a Trio Trading.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

10

15S907

U.S. Patent No. D616,919

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

14S411

18
19
20
21
22

16S039

23
24
25
26
27
28
- 17 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 19 of 27

45.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D919 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

in the D919 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry and Defendants 15S907, 14S411, and 16S039 model

sunglasses are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly,

Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D919

Patent.

Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant

10

should have known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D919 Patent.

11

Defendants acts of infringement of the D919 Patent were not consistent with

12

the standards of commerce for its industry.


46.

13

Defendant infringed the D919 Patent with reckless disregard of

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

14

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D970 Patent by

15

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

16

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

17

the claim of the D970 Patent, including for example, Defendants 15S907 and

18

14S411 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for

19

sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio

20

Trading.

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
- 18 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 20 of 27

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

15S907

U.S. Patent No. D620,970

3
4
5
6
7
8
14S411

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

47.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D970 Patent were

16

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

17

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

18

in the D970 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

19

the eyewear industry and Defendants 15S907 and 14S411 model sunglasses are

20

each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants

21

actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D970 Patent.

22

Defendant infringed the D970 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent

23

rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have

24

known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D970 Patent.

25

Defendants acts of infringement of the D970 Patent were not consistent with

26

the standards of commerce for its industry.

27

///

28

///
- 19 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 21 of 27

48.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D604 Patent by

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

the claim of the D604 Patent, including for example, Defendants 15S907 and

14S411 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for

sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio

Trading.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

10

15S907

U.S. Patent No. D610,604

11
12
13
14
15
16
14S411

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

49.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D604 Patent were

24

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

25

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

26

in the D604 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

27

the eyewear industry and Defendants 15S907 and 14S411 model sunglasses are

28

each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants


- 20 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 22 of 27

actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D604 Patent.

Defendant infringed the D604 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent

rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have

known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D604 Patent.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D604 Patent were not consistent with

the standards of commerce for its industry.

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

SPRT1502

U.S. Patent No. D547,793

9
10
11
12
13
SPRT1016

14
15
16
17
18
19
50.

20

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

21

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D793 Patent by

22

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

23

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

24

the claim of the D793 Patent, including for example, Defendants SPRT1502

25

and SPRT1016 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or

26

offered for sale on the website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its

27

d/b/a Trio Trading.

28

///
- 21 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 23 of 27

51.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D793 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

in the D793 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry and Defendants SPRT1502 and SPRT1016 model

sunglasses are each a nearly identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly,

Defendants actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the D793

Patent.

Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant

10

should have known, that its actions constituted infringement of the D793 Patent.

11

Defendants acts of infringement of the D793 Patent were not consistent with

12

the standards of commerce for its industry.

13

52.

Defendant infringed the D793 Patent with reckless disregard of

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

14

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D182 Patent by

15

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

16

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

17

the claim of the D182 Patent, including for example, Defendants 15S104 model

18

sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on the

19

website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio Trading.

20

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

21

15S104

U.S. Patent No. D659,182

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 22 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 24 of 27

53.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D182 Patent were

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

in the D182 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

the eyewear industry and Defendants 15S104 model sunglasses are a nearly

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

willful and intentional infringement of the D182 Patent. Defendant infringed

the D182 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

10

constituted infringement of the D182 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

11

of the D182 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

12

industry.

13

54.

Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and

14

continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully infringe the D689 Patent by

15

making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a

16

design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to

17

the claim of the D689 Patent, including for example, Defendants 14S502 model

18

sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on the

19

website http://www.triotrading.us/ by Defendant under its d/b/a Trio Trading.

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
- 23 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 25 of 27

Accused Product

Oakleys Patent

14S502

U.S. Patent No. D554,689

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

55.

Defendants acts of infringement of the D689 Patent were

11

undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and

12

belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed

13

in the D689 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout

14

the eyewear industry and Defendants 14S502 model sunglasses are a nearly

15

identical copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute

16

willful and intentional infringement of the D689 Patent. Defendant infringed

17

the D689 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant

18

knew, or it was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions

19

constituted infringement of the D689 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement

20

of the D689 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its

21

industry.

22
23
24
25
26
27

WHEREFORE, Oakley prays for judgment in its favor against


Defendant for the following relief:
A.

An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the

Asserted Patents under 35 U.S.C. 271;


B.

A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its

respective officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and

28
- 24 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 26 of 27

those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from directly or

indirectly infringing the Asserted Patents in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271;

C.

That Defendant account for all gains, profits, and advantages

derived by Defendants infringement of the Asserted Patents in violation of

35 U.S.C. 271, and that Defendant pay to Oakley all damages suffered by

Oakley and/or Defendants total profit from such infringement pursuant to 35

U.S.C. 289;

8
9

D.

An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages

because of Defendants willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284;

10

E.

An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case;

11

F.

An award to Oakley of the attorney fees, expenses, and costs

12
13
14
15
16

incurred by Oakley in connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285;


G.

An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of

this action against Defendant; and,


H.

Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and

proper.

17

Respectfully submitted,

18

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: July 5, 2016

By:

/s/ Ali S. Razai


Michael K. Friedland
Ali S. Razai
Samantha Y. Hsu

Attorneys for Plaintiff


OAKLEY, INC.

25
26
27
28
- 25 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 27 of 27

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL


Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so

2
3

triable.

Respectfully submitted,

KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP

6
7
8

Dated: July 5, 2016

9
10

By: /s/ Ali S. Razai


Michael K. Friedland
Ali S. Razai
Samantha Y. Hsu
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OAKLEY, INC.

11
12
13

23491939

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 26 -

Complaint

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-1 Filed 07/05/16 Page


1 of 2 MMA BGS
'16CV1730

CIVIL COVER SHEET

JS4J (Rev. 12112)

The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the informat ion contained here in neither replace nor supplemcnl the li ling and service of pica dings or olher papers as required by law, except as
provided by loca l ru les of court . This forni, approved by the Judicial Conference o f the United Stales in September 1914, is reqUired for the use of the Clerk of Co un for the
purposc ofiniliating the civil dock.et sheet. (SHE JNSnWCTJONS ON NH:tT /'AGEOP nilS FORM)

I. (3) PLAINTIFFS

DE FENDANTS
NEW SOUTH BAY TRADING, INC., a Califom ia corporation d/b/a
CALIFORNIA WHOLESALE SU NGLASSES and
d/b/a TRIO TRADING

OAKLEY, INC ., a Washington corporation

Orang'. '---_______

(b) COUnty of Residence of First Listed Plai ntilT


(EXC/':f'T IN

County o f Residence o f Firs! Listed Defendant

u.s. 1'l.AfN7"WF CASESj

(IN

NOTE :

Allorncys (Jj Kno"'nj

(c) Attorneys (/-'inn """me. Addres.<. IIIullel.",I"",,-' "'"mMj


Michael K. Friedland , Ali S. Razai, Samantha Hsu
Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP
2040 Main St. , 14th Floor, Irvine, CA 92614 ; (949) 760-0404

II . BAS IS OF' JUR ISDI CT ION (/'~an "X"inOneflt,~()nl))


[] 1

U.S. Governmen!

:II1II 3

[] 2 U.S. c.c".'cmmen!

III. C ITIZENSH I P OF PRINC IPAL PARTIES (/'ilIl'.. att "X" ittOneHa~fi"'J'faiJrliff


(For-/)j,,!"-ity ('ust:!' (111)
PTF
Citi~en ofThi~ State
0'

Fooeral Question
(U.s. Goo"""ttk!ttl NtH 0 Po" )

Plaintiff

o;"ersity
(lndiro/I! Cili:rnship af I'"ni~ ill flem If/)

[] 4

o.,fenda!11

u..<;. f'{..4fNHIF CASES ONf. 1J

[N LAN D COSDEMNA TION CASES, USE THE LOCATtON OF


TIlE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.

DEF

IlIId (hw Hox fIJI' /kfi:ndilltl)


PTF
DEF
Incorporated 0.- Principal Place
O
0
of Business 10 This State

Cnizen of AoothcrStatc

Incorporated o,.,J Principal Place


of nusiness In AnOther Stale

0'

Cnizen or Subject of.


FtHei Comu,,"

[] 3

Foreign Nation

06

IV. NATU RE OF
IT

110 IltSUIWICe

INJ URY

[] 120 Marine:
[] 130 Miller Act
140 Nq,'OIiablc t!I$U\UTJCnL
[] 150 Rtto.-cry ofC}.crpayment

&

Airplane Product
liability
I ,libel &

[] 15! Medicm:Ac!
152 Reca"ny of Defaulted
Student Loans
(Excludes Veterans)
[] 153 R""",'ny of()o,'c-rpayment
ofVe1cml's BencliIS
160 Stockholder! Sui\!;
[] 190OthcrContract
[] 195 Contract Product liability

625 Drug Related Sci7.ure


of Property 21 USC 881
690

o.her

[] 370 Other Fraud


37t Troth in l ending
[] 380
Personal
PropMy Damage
385 I'ropeny Damab~
ProdUC1 l iability

[] 290 All Other Real Propeny

V. ORIG IN (l'lauan
)it I Original.

'lit

Other

I::::~~;;~~:::::::: I ~

Ao
Relations
740 Railway Labor Act
751 Family and MMical
Lc" 'c Act

lI al>e Corpu.:
463 Alien Detainee
510 Motions to Vacate
Scmeocc
530 Generat

535 Death Penalty


Otb.:
540 Mandamu. & Otheo550 Ci,il Righls
55~ Prison Coooition
560 Ci"il Delain.., ..
Condition~ of
Confinement

791 Employee R.-ti~nt


Incomc Security Act

375 False Claims Act


400 State Reapporlionnl(1lt
410Antitf1.lst
430 Banks and Banking
45OC0n1nl("1"tt
460 I>eponation
410 Rackctcerlnl1ucnttd and
Corrupt Organizations

480Consul1lO1"Credit
490 Cable/Sat 1V
850 Securities.'CommoditicY
Exchange
890 Other StatutOI)' Actions
891 Ab'licuitural Acts
893 F. U\"ironmenUlt Maners
895 Freedom oflnfQlTT\3.tion

'"

870 Tun (U. S. Plaintiff


or Defendant)
871 IRS_ Third Pany
26 USC 7609

8\16 Arl:>itration
899 Ad"'inist ...... i... Procedure
Act/Review or Ap\x"al of
Ageney Decision
950 Constitutionality of
State Statutes

Actions

"X ";nilll<'H,.xO"M

0 2 Remo\'ed from

Proceedmg

il

720 l.... bodMallilgement

\~~},C~~~~c::=t~fo'~~~~~~1~~~~~~ill;B;~lo790o.her laborLitigatiOl1
a

rr==j ~

~5=i;:;:;;;;t~~5;;;;;:::=~*i9.ii}t
PERSONAL PROPE RH '
lInjury
iability
Prod""t

196 Franchise

[] 210 Land Condemnation


[] 220 Fora:losure
[] 230 R(11t leaS(: &. Ejectment
240 Tons to Land
[] 245 Tort Product Liability

422AW31 28 USC 158


423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157

[] 368 Asbestos Personal

a
a

PERSONAI. INJlJR\'
[] 365 P("f'S()I1lIt Injury
Product Liability
361 Health Carel
Pharmaceutical
P<1WMllnjury
ProdUCl Liability

State Cou rt

Remanded from
Appellate Coort

o4

Rcinstated or
Reopened

5 Transferred from
Another District

Cite the U.s. Civil Slatut" under "hich you ate tiling (/)0 ,,(1/("il<, j ,,,';sdidiolJai stQI"I~ .",1_
c325~U~.~
S=
. C~.~2
~7~'~=c

6 Mullidistrict

('!1<'<'ifj-)

Litigation

di'Ynil)~:

____________________________________________________________

VI. CAUSE OF ACTION ' BriefdcscripJiol1ofcaus.:::


Patent Infringement

VII, REQUESTED IN
LI C H ECK IF T H[ S IS A CLASS
UNDER RU LE 23. F.R.Cv.P.
COM PLA INT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(.'iw ilb'lruaiom) '
IFANY
JUDGE
DATE

07/0512016

Ac nON

DEMAN)} $

C II EC K YES on ly if demanded in complai nt:

JURY OMAND:

)!:I Yes

0 No

DOCKET NUM BER

SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

l sI Ali S. Razai

FO R OFHC E USE ON L \ '


RECEIPT fI _ _ _ _ _ AMOUNT _ _ _ _ _ ___

APPLY ING IFP _ _ _ _ _ __

JUDCiE _ _ _ _ __

MAG. JUDCi E _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

JS~4

Rn-me {Rev . 121(2)

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-1 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 2

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING C IVIL COVER SKEET FORM J S 44


Authority For Civi l Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover shcel and the infonnation contained herein ncither replaces nor sup plemems the fi lings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, exccpl as provided by local mles of court. This forni, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United Slates in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Conseq uently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the C lerk of
Coun for each civil complaint filL-d. The atlorney fil ing a case should complete the fonn as follows:
l.(a)

(b)

(c)

Pla intiffs-Defe ndants. Enter names (Iasl. first. middle initial) o f plaintifT and defendant. If the plaintifT or defendant is a government agency, use
onl y the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaint ifT or defendant is an official within a government agency. identify first the agency and
then thc official. giving both name and title.
C ounty of Residence. For each civil case filed. except U.S. plaintifT cases. enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintifr resides at the
time of fi ling. In U.S. plaintiO" cases. enter thc name ofthc county in which the first lislL-d defendant resides at the time of fil ing. (NOT E: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "de fcndant~ is the location of the tract of land invo lved.)
Attorneys. Enter the finn name. address. telephone number. and attorney of record. If there are several attomcys. listthelll on an attachment. noting
in this section "(see attachment)".

II.

Jurisdiction. The basis o f jurisdiction is set Ibrth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv. P .. which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X~
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, pl\."'Cedence is given in the order shown below.
Uni ted States plaintiO". (I) Jurisd iction based o n 28 U.S.c. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defenda nt. (2) When the plainti fT is suing the Uni ted Stales, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in th is box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.c. 1331 , where jurisdiction arises un der the Constitution of the United States, an amendmen t
10 the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty orthe United Statcs. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintifTo r defendant code takes
precedence, and bolt 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizcnship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.c. 1332. where parties are citizens of difTcren t stlltes. When Box 4 is checked. thc
citizenship 01" [he dil1erent parties must be checked. (Sec Section III below: NOTE : federa l questio n adions take precedence o,er dinrsit y
cases.)

III .

Residence (citizenshill) of Principal Parties. This ~tion of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversi ty o f citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.

IV.

Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature o f suit cannot be detemlined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below. is
sufficient to enable [he dcputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Admi nistrative Office to detenn ine the nat ure of suit. [fthe cause fits more than
one nature of su it, selcct the mosl definitive.

V.

Origin . Place an "Xft in one of the six boxes.


Original Proceedings. ( I ) Cases which originate in the United States district couns.
Removed from State Court. (2) Proc"."edings init iatcd in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.c.. Section 1441.
When [he petition for removal is granted. check th is box.
Remanded from Appellatc Court. (3) Cht:ck this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Usc the da tc of remand as the filing
date.
Re instated or Reopened. (4) Check this bolt for eases reinstated o r reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the fi ling date.
Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 USc. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within dist rict transfers or
multidistrict litigation transfers.
Muhidistrict Lit igation. (6) Check this box when a muhidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 usc. Section 1407.
Whcn this box is checked. do not chcck (5) above.

VI.

C ause or Action. Repon [he civil statute directly related to [he cause of action and give a brief desc ription o f the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes un less d iversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statu te: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service

VII .

Requested in C omplaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In Ihis space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand. such as a prel iminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.

VIII .

Rela ted C ases. This St.."'Ction of the JS 44 is used to refcrence relnted pending cases. if any. If there are re lated pending cases. insert the docket
numhcrs and the corresponding j udge names for such cases.

Date and Attorney Signature. Da[e and sign the civil wver sheet.

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 1 of 86

TABLE OF EXHIBITS

Page #

Exhibit A ............................................................................................................... 1

Exhibit B ............................................................................................................... 6

Exhibit C ............................................................................................................. 10

Exhibit D ............................................................................................................. 15

Exhibit E ............................................................................................................. 20

Exhibit F ............................................................................................................. 25

Exhibit G ............................................................................................................. 30

10

Exhibit H ............................................................................................................. 37

11

Exhibit I .............................................................................................................. 41

12

Exhibit J .............................................................................................................. 46

13

Exhibit K ............................................................................................................. 51

14

Exhibit L ............................................................................................................. 57

15

Exhibit M ............................................................................................................ 62

16

Exhibit N ............................................................................................................. 67

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TABLE OF EXHIBITS

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 2 of 86

EXHIBIT A

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 3 of 86


USO0D661339S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


(54)

EYEGLASS

(75)

Inventors: Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US);

D581,444 S
D586,379 S

D601,614 S

Term:

D604,756
D604,758
D604,759
D607,040
D610,603
D610,604
D616,013
D616,919
D620,970

14 Years

(21) Appl. No.: 29/407,957


(22)
(51)
(52)
(58)

Filed:

Dec. 5, 2011

LOC (9) Cl.

................................................ ..

16-06

D622,304
D633,550
D636,010
D648,771
D649,579

D16/3004342, 900, D29/1094110, 1324/1102,


351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034123,
351/140, 153, 45446, 2/4264432, 4474449,
2/441, 4344437, 13, 15, D21/483, 6594661;
D14/372

(57)

UJ

Pettito
Bloch et al.
McCracken
Simioni
Sheldon

7/2007

Chuang

8/2007

Daems et al.

11/2007

Elmore

8/2010

8/2010
3/2011
4/2011
11/2011
11/2011

Yee ............................ .. D16/314

Baden et a1.
Chou
Moritz
Rohrbach
ThiXton

CLAIM

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of an eyeglass of the present

...................... ..

invention;

D16/326

.............. ..

D16/321

...................... ..

D16/326

FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;


FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational vieW thereof, the right side

9/2007 MarkovitZ
*

Shin et a1.
Rohrbach et al.
Rohrbach et al.
Rohrbach
ThiXton
ThiXton
Reed
ThiXton
ThiXton

DESCRIPTION

Chuang
Elmore

Mouclier ................... .. D16/321

The ornamental design for an eyeglass, as shoWn and


described.

Fleming

5/2007

S
S
S
S
S

10/2009

11/2009
11/2009
11/2009
12/2009
2/2010
2/2010
5/2010
6/2010
8/2010

Bear, LLP

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

Primary Examiner * Raphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Knobbe Martens Olson &

References Cited

7/1956
5/1962
3/1968
9/1970
7/1997
11/2004
4/2007

ThiXton et al. ............. .. D16/325

* cited by examiner

See application ?le for complete search history.

D178,178
D192,885
D210,418
D218,569
D380,766
D497,934
D539,833
D542,330
D545,868
D549,270
D550,272
D554,688
D554,689
D555,705
D561,809
D561,813
D569,412
D570,897
D575,323
D577,759

2/2009

9/2009 Rohrbach
10/2009 Yee

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

D622,302 S

US. Cl. .................... .. D16/321; D16/326; D16/335


Field of Classi?cation Search ............... .. D16/101,

(56)

1/2009 Yang
*

D599,838 S
D601,613 S

(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

Jun. 5, 2012

11/2008 Jannard et al.

D585,475 S

Peter Yee, Irvine, CA (US)

(**)

US D661,339 S

(45) Date of Patent:

Thixton et a1.

11/2007 Jannard et al.


11/2007 Chuang
2/2008 Yee
2/2008 Baden et a1. ............... ..
5/2008 Jannard et al.
6/2008 Fuchs
8/2008 Jannard et al.
9/2008 Yee

elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 5 is a top plan vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.
The broken line portions of the drawings are for illustrative

D16/325

purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

Exhibit A

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 4 of 86

US. Patent

Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 1 of4

US D661,339 S

Exhibit A

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 5 of 86

US. Patent

Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 2 of4

US D661,339 S

Exhibit A

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 6 of 86

US. Patent

Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 3 of4

US D661,339 S

Exhibit A

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 7 of 86

US. Patent

Jun. 5, 2012

Sheet 4 of4

US D661,339 S

Exhibit A

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 8 of 86

EXHIBIT B

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 9 of 86


USO0D581443 S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


Jannard et a].

(54)

EYEGLASSES COMPONENTS

5,610,668 A
D384,364
5,760,868
D399,519
D399,866
D401,607
D410,484
6,233,342

(75) Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA


(US); Lek Thixton, Orcas, WA (US);
Colin Baden, Irvine, CA (US); Peter

Yee, Irvine, CA (US)

(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)


(**)

Term:

D452,522 S

U.S. Appl.
US. Appl.
U.S. Appl.
U.S. Appl.

(62) Division of application No. 29/266,547, ?led on Sep.


22, 2006, noW Pat. No. Des. 569,412.
LOC (8) Cl.
US. Cl.

Yee
Jannard et a1.
Yee
Yee
Miniutti
Jannard et a1.
Fernandez

12/2001

Chiou

..................... .. D16/330

4/2003 Thixton et a1.


*

9/2006

Matera .................... .. D16/315

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

Mar. 21, 2008

Related US. Application Data

(51)
(52)
(58)

9/1997
6/1998
10/1998
10/1998
11/1998
6/1999
5/2001

6/2002 Soper

D473,892 S

(21) Appl. No.: 29/301,902


Filed:

D458,624 S

14 Years

*1, Nov. 25, 2008

3/1997 Mage

S
A
S
S
S
S
B1

D529,066 S

(22)

US D581,443 S

(45) Date of Patent:

Field of Classi?cation Search .............. ..

29/266,547,
29/288,604,
29/288,605,
29/288,606,

?led Sep.
?led Jun.
?led Jun.
?led Jun.

22, 2006.
15,2007.
15,2007.
15,2007.

* cited by examiner

................................................ ..

................................................... ..

No.
No.
No.
No.

Primary ExamineriRaphael Barkai

16-06

(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm4Gregory K. Nelson

D16/314

D16/ 101,

(57)

D16/3004342; D29/1094110; D24/110.2;


351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034123,
351/140, 153; 2/4264432, 4474449, 441,

CLAIM

The ornamental design for eyeglass components, as shoWn


and described.

2/4344437

See application ?le for complete search history.

DESCRIPTION

References Cited

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglass components

(56)

of the present invention;

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

D150,924 S
D176,316 S
D178,178 S

9/1948 Blight
12/1955 Fleming
7/1956 Fleming

D293,450
D323,333
D324,394
D329,442
D330,035
D331,587
5,249,001
D344,742

12/1987
1/1992
3/1992
9/1992
10/1992
12/1992
9/1993
3/1994

S
S
S
S
S
S
A
S

D346,814 S

D354,501 S

5/1994

FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;


FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational vieW thereof, the right-side

Jannard
Jannard et a1.
Jannard
Jannard
Jannard
Jannard et a1.
Jannard
Jannard

elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 5 is a top elevational vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.

Phantom lining, Where utilized, is for illustrative purposes


only and is not intended to limit the claimed design to the
features shoWn in phantom.

Iida ......................... .. D16/314

1 Claim, 3 Drawing Sheets

1/1995 Jannard

Exhibit B

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 10 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 25, 2008

Sheet 1 of3

US D581,443 S

Exhibit B

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 11 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 25, 2008

Sheet 2 of3

US D581,443 S

Exhibit B

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 12 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 25, 2008

Sheet 3 of3

US D581,443 S

Exhibit B

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 13 of 86

EXHIBIT C

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 14 of 86


USO0D581444S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


Jannard et a].

(54)

EYEGLASS COMPONENTS

5,760,868
D399,519
D399,866
D401,607
D410,484
6,233,342

(75) Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA


(US); Lek Thixton, Orcas, WA (US);
Colin Baden, Irvine, CA (US); Peter

Yee, Irvine, CA (US)

(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)


(**)

Term:

US D581,444 S

(45) Date of Patent:

14 Years

A
S
S
S
S
B1

6/1998
10/1998
10/1998
11/1998
6/1999
5/2001

*1, Nov. 25, 2008


Jannard et a1.
Yee
Yee
Miniutti
Jannard et a1.
Fernandez

D458,624 S

6/2002 Soper

D473,892 S

4/2003 Thixton et a1.

D497,380 S

10/2004

Thixton et a1.

.... .. D16/326

D508,515

8/2005

Yee et a1.

. . . . ..

D513,761 S
D529,066 S

*
*

1/2006
9/2006

Yee et a1.
.... .. D16/335
Matera .................... .. D16/315

.......

D16/335

(21) Appl. No.: 29/301,914


OTHER PUBLICATIONS

(22)

Filed:

Mar. 21, 2008

Related US. Application Data

(62) Division of application No. 29/266,547, ?led on Sep.


22, 2006, noW Pat. No. Des. 569,412.

(51)
(52)
(58)

LOC (8) Cl.

U.S. Appl.
US. Appl.
US. Appl.
U.S. Appl.

No.
No.
No.
No.

29/266,547,
29/288,604,
29/288,605,
29/288,606,

?led Sep.
?led Jun.
?led Jun.
?led Jun.

22, 2006.
15, 2007.
15,2007.
15,2007.

* cited by examiner

................................................ ..

16-06

US. Cl. ................... .. D16/314; D16/321; D16/335


Field of Classi?cation Search .............. .. D16/ 101,

D1 6/300i342; D29/109*110; D24/110.2;


351/41, 44, 5152, 62, 158, 92, 103*123,
351/140, 153; 2/426i432, 447*449, 441,
2/434i437

Primary ExamineriRaphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm4Gregory K. Nelson

(57)

CLAIM

The ornamental design for eyeglass components, as shoWn


and described.

See application ?le for complete search history.


DESCRIPTION

(56)

References Cited

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglass components


U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

D150,924 S
D176,316 S
D178,178 S

9/1948 Blight
12/1955 Fleming
7/1956 Fleming

D293,450
D323,333
D324,394
D329,442
D330,035
D331,587
5,249,001
D344,742
D354,501

12/1987
1/1992
3/1992
9/1992
10/1992
12/1992
9/1993
3/1994
1/1995

S
S
S
S
S
S
A
S
S

Jannard
Jannard et al.
Jannard
Jannard
Jannard
Jannard et al.
Jannard
Jannard
Jannard

5,610,668 A

3/1997 Mage

D384,364 S

9/1997 Yee

of the present invention;


FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a lateral left-side elevational vieW thereof, the lateral

right-side elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 4 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;

FIG. 5 is a top elevational vieW thereof; and,


FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.
Phantom lining, Where utilized, is for illustrative purposes
only and is not intended to limit the claimed design to the

features shoWn in phantom.


1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

10

Exhibit C

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 15 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 25, 2008

Sheet 1 of4

US D581,444 S

FIG. 1

11

Exhibit C

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 16 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 25, 2008

Sheet 2 of4

12

US D581,444 S

Exhibit C

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 17 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 25, 2008

Sheet 3 of4

US D581,444 S

FIG. 5

13

Exhibit C

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 18 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 25, 2008

Sheet 4 of4

US D581,444 S

FIG. 6

14

Exhibit C

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 19 of 86

EXHIBIT D

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 20 of 86


USO0D569412S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.2


Jannard et a].
(54)

(75)

(45) Date of Patent:

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS

5,610,668 A

Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA


.

(73)

9/1997 Yee

6/1993 J?IlIl?fd et ?1~

(21)

ee

11/1998 Miniutti

13410,484 s
.

6/1999 Jannard 6i a1.

6,233,342 B1

5/2001

Asslgn?Z Oakley Inc-i P00111111 Ranch CA(US)

D447162 s *

8/2001 123221622161. .......... .. 1316/326

13458,624 s

6/2002 SOper

Tenn?

14 Years

13473,892 s

4/2003 ThiXton 6161.

29/266 547

13508515 s *

1 N

pp-

(22)

$8

D401,607 s

3/1997 Mage

5,760,868 A

CAGE) Peter
.

4* May 20, 2008

13384,364 s

(US); Lek Thixton, Orcas, WA (Us);

US D569,412 S

0-1

Filed:

13513,761 s
13533,889 s

Sep. 22, 2006

LOC (8) Cl.

(52)

US. Cl. ................................... ..

............................................... .. 16-06

(58)

Field of Classi?cation Search ............. .. D16/101,

_ _
2/434i437; 1321/4833 659661
See appl1cat1on ?le for complete search h1story.

Yee 6i a1. ................ .. 1316/321


Saderholm 6i a1. ...... .. 1316/314

7/2007 Chuang ................... ..1316/314

2x33015266mfigii?giO

1316/30m342; 1329/1094110, 1324/1102;

(56)

1/2006
12/2006

* cited by examiner

D16/314; Dl6/32l

351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034123,


351/140, 153, 2/4264432, 4474449, 441,

8/2005 Yee 6i a1. ................ .. 1316/335

*
*

13545868 s *

(51)

K Nelson

g "y

(57)

'

CLAIM

The ornamental design for eyeglass and eyeglass compo


nems as Shown and described

References Cited
DESCRIPTION
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglass and the

13150924 5

9/1948 Blight

Dl76,3l6 S

12/1955

D178l78 S
D293,450 S

7/1956 Fleming
12/ 1987 Jannard

eyeglass components of the present invention;

Fleming

et 31'

D329442 S

9 / 1992 Jannard

D330,035 S

10/1992 Jannard

i
3/1994 Jannard

D354,501 S

1/1995 Jannard

FIG. is a left-side'elevational vieW thereof, the right-side


elevat1onal v1eW bemg a m1rror 1mage thereof;

FIG. 5 is a top plan vieW thereof; and,

et 31'

D344,742 S

FIG. 2 1s a front elevatlonal v1eW thereof;


FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;

FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.


1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

15

Exhibit D

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 21 of 86

U.S. Patent

May 20, 2008

Sheet 1 of4

16

US D569,412 S

Exhibit D

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 22 of 86

U.S. Patent

May 20, 2008

Sheet 2 0f 4

17

US D569,412 S

Exhibit D

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 23 of 86

U.S. Patent

May 20, 2008

Sheet 3 0f 4

18

US D569,412 S

Exhibit D

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 24 of 86

U.S. Patent

May 20, 2008

Sheet 4 0f 4

19

US D569,412 S

Exhibit D

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 25 of 86

EXHIBIT E

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 26 of 86


USO0D558816S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


Yee
(54)

US D558,816 S

(45) Date of Patent:

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS

D414,796 S
D423,548 S

(75) Inventor: Peter Yee, Irvine, CA (US)

D461,834 S
D535,316 S

(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

D537,467

(**)

D540,846

Term:

14 Years

(21) Appl. No.: 29/238,943

Jan. 1, 2008

10/1999 Arnette
4/2000 Yee et al.
*
*

8/2002
1/2007

Jannard et a1.
Teng

.......... .. D16/334
.... .. D16/326

2/2007

Teng

D539,833 S

4/2007

Chuang ..

......

.... .. D16/321
. . . . ..

.....

. . . . ..

D16/335

4/2007

Sheldon

D541,839 S

5/2007

Sheldon ..

D16/326

D542,330 S

5/2007

Elmore .................... .. D16/320

.... .. D16/327

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

(22) Filed:
(51)
(52)
(58)

Sep. 21, 2005

LOC (8) Cl.

............................................... ..

US. Cl. ................................... ..

16-06

D16/326; D16/335

Field of Classi?cation Search ..... ..

D16/300*330,

D16/101,332*338; D29/l09ill0; D24/110.2;


351/41, 44, 5152, 62, 158, 92, 103*111,
351/156,61,114*119,121*123; 2/426i432,
2/4474149, 441, 434*437
See application ?le for complete search history.

(56)

References Cited

Sunglass Hut catalog, p. 27, 2002*


Oakley, Inc. Oi?cial Eyewear Catalog (2002), p. 15, Foothill
Ranch, CA.
* cited by examiner

Primary ExamineriRaphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or FirmiGregory K. Nelson

(57)

CLAIM

The ornamental design for an eyeglass and eyeglass com


ponents, as shoWn and described.

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


D187,299
D193,028
D199,150
D202,658
D204,812
D209,862

S
S
S
S
S
S

2/1960
6/1962
9/1964
10/1965
5/1966
1/1968

Behr
Petitto
Carmichael
Petitto
Shindler
Carmichael

D268,683 S

4/1983 Tenny

D285,020
D372,726
D390,589
D397,350
D397,351

8/1986
8/1996
2/1998
8/1998
8/1998

Schmidthaler
Simioni
Simioni
Jannard et a1.
Simioni

1/1999

Davis ...................... .. D16/315

S
S
S
S
S

D404,055 S

D404,754 S

1/1999 Yee et al.

D407,099 S

3/1999 Wang

DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglass and

eyeglass components of the present invention;


FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;

FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational vieW of the eyeglass and

eyeglass front, the right side elevational vieW being a mirror

image thereof;
FIG. 5 is a bottom plan vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a top plan vieW thereof.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

20

Exhibit E

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 27 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jan. 1, 2008

Sheet 1 of4

US D558,816 S

FIG. 1

21

Exhibit E

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 28 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jan. 1, 2008

Sheet 2 of4

US D558,816 S

FIG. 4

22

Exhibit E

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 29 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jan. 1, 2008

Sheet 3 of4

23

US D558,816 S

Exhibit E

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 30 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jan. 1, 2008

Sheet 4 of4

24

US D558,816 S

Exhibit E

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 31 of 86

EXHIBIT F

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 32 of 86


USO0D548269S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


Baden et al.

US D548,269 S

(45) Date of Patent:

(54) EYEGLASSES

D537,861 S

3/2007

*1,

Aug. 7, 2007

Teng ....................... .. D16/325

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

(75) Inventors: Colin Baden, Irvine, CA (US); Hans


Karsten Moritz, Foothill Ranch, CA
(US); Peter Yee, Irvine, CA (US)

Asia Paci?c Trading Co., Inc., Asia Paci?c 1999-2000, p. 52.


Asia Paci?c Trading Co., Inc., Asia Paci?c 2000 Supplement, p.

(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

Alpina, Ski & sportglasses by Alpina 96/97, pp. 1-12.


Alpina, Preisliste Sport 1996/1997, Optik, all pages.

(**) Term:

published in Oyannaax CedeX, France.

20.

Berthet-Bondet S.A., BBSOL Lunettes De Soleil 1986, all pages,

14 Years

Berthet-Bondet S.A., BBSOL Lunettes De Soleil 1984, all pages

(21) Appl. No.: 29/225,027

published in Oyonnaax Cedex, France.

(22) Filed:

published in Oyonnaax Cedex, France.


VOGUE 3511 S sunglass model, unknown publishing date, printed

Berthet-Bonet S.A., BBSOL Lunettes De Soleil 1983, p. 5,

Mar. 9, 2005

(51)

LOC (8) Cl.

(52)

US. Cl. ................................... ..

............................................... .. 16-06

(58)

Field of Classi?cation Search ..... .. Dl6/300i330,

D16/326; D16/313

D16/101,332*338; D29/109*110; D24/110.2;


351/41, 44, 5152, 62, 158, 92, 103*111,
351/156,61,114*119,121*123; 2/426i432,
2/447i449, 441, 436, 434*437
See application ?le for complete search history.
(56)

from 222.sunglasshut.com on Jul. 18, 2005.

Killer Loop Sheer sunglass model, unknown publishing date,


printed from wwwsunglasshutcom on Jul. 18, 2005.

* cited by examiner

Primary ExamineriRaphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or FirmiGregory K. Nelson

(57)

CLAIM

References Cited
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
S
S
S
S
S
D209,862 S

2/1960
6/1962
9/ 1964
10/1965
5/1966
1/1968

D187,299
D193,028
Dl99,l50
D202,658
D204,812

D210,048 S

Behr
Petitto
Carmichael
Petitto
Shindler
McCracken

1/1968 Imperatice

3,689,136 A

9/1972 Atamian

D268,683 S

4/1983 Tenny

D285,020 S
D289,301 S

8/1986 Schmidthaler
4/1987 Jannard

D327,081 S

D372,726 S
D378,376 S
D431,257 S

6/1992

Nakamura et al. ....... .. D16/313

8/1996 Simioni
3/1997 Tsai
*

9/2000

The ornamental design for an eyeglasses, as shoWn and


described.
DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglasses of the

present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational vieW of the eyeglasses, the

right side elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 5 is a top plan vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

Yang ....................... .. D16/313

25

Exhibit F

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 33 of 86

U.S. Patent

Aug. 7, 2007

Sheet 1 of4

26

US D548,269 S

Exhibit F

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 34 of 86

U.S. Patent

Aug. 7, 2007

Sheet 2 of4

27

US D548,269 S

Exhibit F

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 35 of 86

U.S. Patent

Au .7 2007

Sheet 3 of4

FIG. 5

28

Exhibit F

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 36 of 86

U.S. Patent

Au .7 2007

Sheet 4 M4

29

Exhibit F

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 37 of 86

EXHIBIT G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 38 of 86

30

Exhibit G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 39 of 86

31

Exhibit G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 40 of 86

32

Exhibit G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 41 of 86

33

Exhibit G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 42 of 86

34

Exhibit G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 43 of 86

35

Exhibit G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 44 of 86

36

Exhibit G

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 45 of 86

EXHIBIT H

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 46 of 86

37

Exhibit H

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 47 of 86

38

Exhibit H

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 48 of 86

39

Exhibit H

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 49 of 86

40

Exhibit H

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 50 of 86

EXHIBIT I

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 51 of 86


USO0D649579S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.2


Thixton
(54)

EYEGLASS

D570,897 s

8/2008 Jannard et a1.

D581,444 S

(75)

Inventor.

Lek Thlxton, Eastsound, WA (US)

(73)

Ass1gnee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

(>1<>1<)

Term:

(21)

APPLNO" 29/391383

(22)

Filed:

(51)
(52)

LOC (9) Cl. ................................................ .. 16-06


U.S.Cl. .................................... .. D16/321; D16/326

(58)

Field ofClassi?cation Search ............... .. D16/101,

D616,013 S

1316/300642, 900; 1329/109410; 1324/1102;

11/2008

14 Years

D585,475 S

l/2009

D586,379 S *

2/2009 Thixton et a1. ............. .. D16/325

D595,333 S

6/2009

D599,838 S
D601,613 S

_
_

May 6,2011

2/441, 4344437, 13, 15; D2l/483, 6594661


See application ?le for complete search history.
References Cited

D488,499 S

4/2004

Teufelhart .................. .. D16/326

D610603 S
D610604 S

13622304 S

1/2007

Mage ......................... .. D16/326

6/2007

Chen .......................... .. D16/326

7/2007 Chuang
9/2007 Markovitz
11/2007 Jannard et a1.

D555,705 S

11/2007 Chuang

D561,809 S

2/2008 Yee
*

2/2008

Fox et a1. ................... .. D16/325

2/2008

Fox et a1.

D561,813 S

2/2008

Baden et a1. ............... .. D16/325

D569,412 S

D629,830 s *

12/2009 Rohrbach
20010 Thixton
2/2010 Thixton

5/2010 Reed

$294011
1X on

8/2010 Baden et 31'


12/2010 Markovitz etal. ......... .. D16/326

D636,010 S
4/2011 Moritz
* Cited by examiner

CLAIM

The ornamental design for an eyeglass, as shoWn and


described.
DESCRIPTION

Mage ......................... .. D16/326

D550,272 S
D554,689 S

D561,812

11/2009 Rohrbach et a1.

(57)

4/2007 Chuang

D545,868 S

D561,811 S

Shin et a1.

11/2004 Sheldon

D539,833 S
D545,348 S

D604,759 S

7/1997 Simioni

D497,934 S
D534,573 S

11/2009

11/2009 Rohrbach et a1.

Bear, LLP

5/1962 Pettito
3/1968 Bloch etal.
9/1970 McCracken
5/1977

10/2009 Yee

D604,756 S

Primary Examiner * Raphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Knobbe Martens Olson &

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS


D178,178 S
7/1956 Fleming

MarkovitZ et a1. ......... .. D16/326

9/2009 Rohrbach

D604,758 s
D607,040 S

351/140, 1534546; 2/426*432,447*449,

D380,766 S

Yang

D606,578 s * 12/2009 Markovitz et a1. ......... .. D16/320

351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034123,

D192,885 S
D210,418 S
D218,569 S

Jannard et a1.

13583405 S * 120008 Chen B16626

(56)

*9: Nov. 29, 2011

6/2008 Fuchs

D575,323 S

D244,281 S

US D649,579 S

(45) Date of Patent:

.....

. . . ..

D16/325

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of an eyeglass of the present

invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1,

the right side elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 5 is a top plan vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW of the eyeglass of FIG. 1.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

5/2008 Jannardetal.

41

Exhibit I

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 52 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 29, 2011

Sheet 1 014

US D649,579 S

FIG. 1

42

Exhibit I

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 53 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 29, 2011

Sheet 2 of4

43

US D649,579 S

Exhibit I

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 54 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 29, 2011

Sheet 3 of4

44

US D649,579 S

Exhibit I

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 55 of 86

US. Patent

Nov. 29, 2011

Sheet 4 of4

45

US D649,579 S

Exhibit I

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 56 of 86

EXHIBIT J

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 57 of 86


USO0D554689S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.2


Jannard et a].
(54)

EYEGLASS FRAME

D399,238 S

10/1998

D407,099 S

(75)

Inventors: James H. Jannard, Spieden Island, WA

(73)

13414396 5
2

221E265 ms) Coll Baden Imne

D488,499 s

D500,781 S
D518,847

Assignee. Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)

Tenn?

Appl. No.: 29/272,776

(22)

Filed:

. . . . .. Dl6/326

1/2005

Mage ..

.... .. D16/326

4/2006

Teng

. ... ..

......

. . . . ..

D16/326

____ __ B16626

1/2007

Teng

D534,573

1/2007

Mage

.....

. . . . .. Dl6/326

. . . . ..

D16/326

D536,028 S

1/2007

Paulson ..

.... .. D16/326

2/2007 Teng ....................... .. D16/326

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
_

Sunglass Hut, p. 5, 2002*

US. Appl. N0. 29/227,719, ?led Apr. 13, 2005, Jannard, Pending

(62) Division of application No. 29/227,719, ?led on Apr.


13, 2005.

apphcanon'
* cited by examiner

(51)

LOC (s) C].

(52)

us. Cl. ................................................... .. 1)16/326

(58)

Field of Classi?cation Search ..... .. Dl6/300i330,

............................................... .. 16-06

D16/101,332*338; D29/l09ill0; D24/110.2;


351/41 44 51452 62 158 92 1034111

351/156, 61, 1144119, 1214123, 2/4264432,


2/4474449, 441, 436, 4344437

Primary ExamineriRaphael Barkai


(74)A0r"@y~4g@10rFirm*Greg1'Y K- Nelson

(57)

(56)

References Cited

The ornamental design for an eyeglass frame, as shown and

described

S
S
S
S

5/1962

6/1962
9/1964
10/1965
1/1968

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglass frame of


FIG. 2 is a left-side elevational vieW thereof, the right-side

Petitto ..................... .. D16/329

elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;

Petitto
Carmichael
Petitto
McCracken

FIG. 3 is a front elevational vieW thereof;


FIG. 4 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;

D210,418 S

3/1968

D218,569 S

9/1970 McCracken ..

D264,094 S

4/1982

DESCRIPTION

the present invention;

US. PATENT DOCUMENTS


*

CLAIM
-

See application ?le for complete search history.

Bloch ...................... .. D16/326


Morris

D268,683 S

4/1983 Tenny

D285,020
D372,726
D390,589
D397,351

8/1986
8/1996
2/1998
8/1998

S
S
S
S

....
~~~~ ..~~

Mage . . . . .

D537,467 s *

Related U-S- APPIICatIOII Data

D193,028
D199,150
D202,658
D209,862

21mg
ne e
4/2004

D534,572

Feb. 15,2007

D192,885 S

Simioni ................... .. D16/326

1353293 S * 11/2006 Mangum

14 Years

(21)

Nov. 6, 2007

10/ 1999 Afnette

4*

3/1999 Wang

(US); Hans Karsten


_
Moritz,
Foothill
~

**

US D554,689 S

(45) Date of Patent:

D16/325

.................... .. D16/325

Schmidthaler
Simioni
Simioni
Simioni

FIG. 5 is a top elevational vieW thereof; and,


FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.
Phantom lining, Where utilized, is for illustrative purposes
only and is not intended to limit the claimed design to the

features shoWn in phantom.


1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

46

Exhibit J

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 58 of 86

U.S. Patent

Nov. 6, 2007

Sheet 1 of4

47

US D554,689 S

Exhibit J

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 59 of 86

U.S. Patent

Nov. 6, 2007

Sheet 2 of4

48

US D554,689 S

Exhibit J

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 60 of 86

U.S. Patent

Nov. 6, 2007

Sheet 3 of4

US D554,689 S

FIG. 5
49

Exhibit J

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 61 of 86

U.S. Patent

Nov. 6, 2007

Sheet 4 of4

US D554,689 S

FIG. 6

50

Exhibit J

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 62 of 86

EXHIBIT K

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 63 of 86


USO0D620970S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


Thixton
(54)

US D620,970 S

(45) Date of Patent:

EYEGLASS COMPONENT

D547,794 S

4*

Aug. 3, 2010

7/2007 Jannard etal.


*

(75) Inventor: Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US)

(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)


(**)

Term:

31322121 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ " B16626

D552665 S

14 Years

9/2007 Mage

D554,689 S

11/2007 Jannard et al.

D556,818 S

12/2007 Jannard et a1.


l/2008 Yee

D558,8l6 S

(21)

APP1-NO-I 29/348,088

D561,810 s

(22)

D568,37l

Flled:

NW'252009

(62)

2/2008 FOX etal.


*

5/2008

13575323 s *

Related U_s_APPlicati0n Data


_

Chen ....................... .. Dl6/323

8/2008 Jannard etal. ........... .. D16/335

D575,8l3 S

8/2008 Li ........................... .. Dl6/326

13577,?59

9/2008

Yee

......................... ..

D16/326

D1v1s1on of appl1cat1on No. 29/315,956, ?led on Aug.


10, 2009, noW Pat. No. Des. 610,604.

(51)

LOC (9) Cl. ................................................ .. 16-06

(52)

US. Cl. ................................................... ..

(58)

Field of Classi?cation Search .............. .. D16/101,

(Continued)

D16/326

1316/3004342; 1329/1094110; 1324/1102;

351/41, 44, 5152, 62, 158, 92, 103*123,


351/140,153,45446; 2/4264432, 4474449,
2/441, 436, 434*437, 13, 15; D21/483, 659*661

See application ?le for Complete Search history'

Primary ExamineriRaphael Barkai

(70141100162 Age/11, 0r Firm%regory K- Nelson

(57)

CLAIM
.

The ornamental deslgn for an eyeglass component, as shoWn


and described.

(56)

References Cited
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
D204,812
D210,418
D377,803
D378,375
D390,589
D397,351
D400,230
D406,858
D411,560
D415,515
D420,035
D422,010
D430,591

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S

5/1966
3/1968
2/1997
3/1997
2/1998
8/1998
10/1998
3/1999
6/1999
10/1999
2/2000
3/2000
9/2000

Shindler
Bloch
Wilson
Tsai
Simioni
Simioni
Arnette
Arnette
Arnette
Arnetteetal.
Hartman
Arnette
Arnette

D488,499 S
D500,781 S
D534,573 S

4/2004 Mage
1/2005 Mage
1/2007 Mage

D536,027 S
D539,830 S

1/2007 Paulson
4/2007 Saderholm et al.

DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglass component

of the present invention;


FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side lateral elevational vieW thereof, the right

side lateral elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 5 is a right-side medial elevational vieW thereof, the
left-side medial elevational vieW being a mirror image

thereof;
FIG. 6 is a top plan vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 7 is a bottom elevational vieW thereof.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

51

Exhibit K

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 64 of 86

US D620,970 S
Page2
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
D585,928 s

2/2009

Markovitz ............... ..D16/326

D594,052 s

6/2009

Yang ........... ..

D595,333 S

6/2009 Markovitz et a1. ....... .. Dl6/321

D604,759 S

11/2009 Rohrbach et a1. ........ .. Dl6/335

D606113 S

12/2009

Daemsetal' ~~~~~~~~~~~~ " B16626

.. D16/326

* cited by examiner

52

Exhibit K

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 65 of 86

US. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 1 of4

53

US D620,970 S

Exhibit K

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 66 of 86

US. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 2 of4

54

US D620,970 S

Exhibit K

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 67 of 86

US. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 3 of4

55

US D620,970 S

Exhibit K

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 68 of 86

US. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 4 of4

56

US D620,970 S

Exhibit K

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 69 of 86

EXHIBIT L

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 70 of 86


USO0D610604S

(12) Unlted States Deslgn Patent (10) Patent N0.2


Thixton
(54)

(75)

(45) Date of Patent:

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENTS

Inventor:

Lek Thixton, Eastsound, WA (US)

(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)


**

Term

14 Years
_

(21)

APPLNO" 29/315956

(22)

Flled:

.
Aug-10,2009

(52)

U.S.Cl.

(58)

Field of Classi?cation Search .............. ..

...................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . D16/326;D16/335
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..

D16/101,

D16/3004342; D29/1094110; D24/110.2;

351/41 44 51*52 62 158 92 103*123


351/140 153 45*46 157; 2/426T432 447*449
2/441, 4344437, 13, 15; D21/483, 6594661
See application ?le for complete search history.
56

References Cited

( )

US D610,604 S

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

11* Feb. 23, 2010

D534,573 S

1/2007 Mage

D536,027 s

1/2007 Paulson

13539330 5

4/2007 Sadefholm et ?1~

13547,794 s

7/2007 Jannard et a1.

135507272 S

9/2007 Markovltz

13552,665 s

9/2007 Mage

D554,689 s

11/2007

13556,818 s

12/2007 Jannardetal.

Jannardet a1.

13558,816 s

1/2008 Yee

13561,810 s

2/2008 FOX et a1.

13575813 s

8/2008

Li ........................... .. Dl6/326

13594,052

6/2009

Yang . . . . . .

D599,838 s

9/2009

Rohrbach ................ .. Dl6/326

D604,759

>l<
*

11/2009

s
S

. . . . .. Dl6/326

Rohrbachetal.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ........
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
~~

Dl6/326

* clted by examlner

Primary ExamineriRaphael Barkai


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm4Gregory K. Nelson
(57)

CLAIM
.

The ornamental deslgn for an eyeglass and eyeglass compo


nents, as shoWn.

D204,812 S
D210,418 S

5/1966 Shindler
3/1968 Bloch

DESCRIPTION

13377303 5
133781375 S

2/ 1997 Wi1_S0I1
3/1997 Tsal

FIG. 1 is a front perspective View of the eyeglass and eyeglass


components of the present invention;

D390,589 S

2/1998

13397351 S
13400230 5
D406 858

134113560 S
13415515 S

Simioni

8/1998 Simioni
10/1998 Afnette
3/1999

Ar

'

tt

6/1999 A32:
10/1999 Amette et a1

13420935 5

2/2000 Hartman

D422,010 S

3/2000

13430591 S

9/2000 Amette

D488,499 S

4/2004 Mage

D500,78l S

l/2005 Mage

'

'

FIG. 2 1s a front elevat1onal V1eW thereof;


FIG. 3 is a rear elevational View thereof;
.

FIG. 1s a left-slde eleVat1onal~V1eW thereof, the r1ght-s1de


elevatlonal V1eW bemg a m1rror 1mage thereof;

FIG. 5 is a top plan View thereof; and,

Arnette

FIG. 6 1s a bottom plan V1eW thereof.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

57

Exhibit L

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 71 of 86

US. Patent

Feb. 23, 2010

Sheet 1 of4

US D610,604 S

FIG. 1

58

Exhibit L

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 72 of 86

US. Patent

Feb. 23, 2010

Sheet 2 of4

59

US D610,604 S

Exhibit L

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 73 of 86

US. Patent

Feb. 23, 2010

Sheet 3 of4

60

US D610,604 S

Exhibit L

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 74 of 86

US. Patent

Feb. 23, 2010

Sheet 4 of4

61

US D610,604 S

Exhibit L

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 75 of 86

EXHIBIT M

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 76 of 86


USO0D547793S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


Baden et al
(54)

EYEGLASSES

(75) Inventors: Colin Baden, Irvine, CA (US); Hans

1/1998 Simioni

13390589 s

2/1998 Simioni

13392308 5

3/1993 Simioni

2 * lg;

(M)

13420,035

Asslgnee' Oakley I"Fth1HRanhCA(US)


Tenn:

14 Years

(21)

APP1- NO-I 29/225,018

(22)

F1led:

(51)

LOC (8) Cl.

(58)

Ulsl
FieldCl!
of

1m1on1

D414,796 s
s

2/2000

.... ..1316/326
. . . . ..1316/326

4/2004

............................................... ..

16-06

351/156, 61, 1144119, 1214123; 2/4264432,

See application ?le for complete search history.


References Cited
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
2/1960 Behr
*

S
S
S
S
S

5/1962

6/1962
9/1964
10/1965
5/1966
l/l968

Mage

.....

D500,781 s *

1/2005 Mage ..

D518,847

4/2006

1/2007

Teng

......

.... ..1316/326
. . . . ..1316/326

.... .. 1316/326

Teng ....................... ..1316/326

1/2007 Mage ...................... .. D16/326

D536,028 s

1/2007

Paulson ..

D537,467 s

2/2007

Teng ....................... .. 1316/326

Classi?cation
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Search
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~..~ ~ ~ ~ D16/3004330,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~

D192,885 S

Hartman .................. ..1316/325

13488,499

BS3457} S *

1316/101,3324338; 1329/1094110; 1324/1102;


351/41, 44, 51452, 62, 158, 92, 1034111,

Dl93,028
D199,150
D202,658
D204,812
D209,862

13449541 s * 10/2001 Arnette

13534572 s

Mar. 10, 2005

D187,299 S

B16626
................... ..

10/1999 Arnette

13532,033 s * 11/2006 Mangum

(56)

glmlonl

ms) Peter Yee Imne CA (Us)

Jul 31, 2007

*9:

13389504 s

Karsten Moritz, Foothill Ranch, CA


(73)

US D547,793 S

45 Date of Patent

.... .. 1316/326

sunglassHutp 5 2002
* cited by examiner
_
_
Primary
ExammeriRaphael
Barkai_

(74) Attorney Agent or FlrmiGregory K Nelson


(57)

CLAIM

The ornamental design for an eyeglasses, as shoWn and


described.

Petitto ..................... .. D16/329

Petitto
Carmichael
Petitto
Schindler
McCracken

D210,418 S

3/1968

Bloch ...................... .. D16/326

D218,569 S
D264,094 S

*
*

9/1970
4/1982

McCracken .............. .. D16/325


Morris .................... .. D16/325

D268,683 S

4/1983 Tenny

D339,816 S
D363,504 S
D372,726 S

9/1993 Jackson
10/1995 Arnette
8/1996 Simioni

D372,929 S

8/1996 Conway

D377,803 S

2/1997 Wilson

DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of the eyeglasses of the

present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left-side elevational vieW of the eyeglasses, the

right side elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 5 is a top plan vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

62

Exhibit M

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 77 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jul. 31, 2007

Sheet 1 of4

63

US D547,793 S

Exhibit M

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 78 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jul. 31, 2007

Sheet 2 of4

64

US D547,793 S

Exhibit M

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 79 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jul. 31, 2007

Sheet 3 of4

65

US D547,793 S

Exhibit M

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 80 of 86

U.S. Patent

Jul. 31, 2007

Sheet 4 of4

US D547,793 S

FIG. 6

66

Exhibit M

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 81 of 86

EXHIBIT N

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 82 of 86


USO0D659182S

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.:


Shin et a].
(54)

EYEGLASS AND EYEGLASS COMPONENT

1/2007 Paulson

D539,831 S

4/2007 Hsu

Term

g?ging

135472359 s

7/2007 Krakoff et al.

lrvlne, CA (US)

D549,764 s *

8/2007 Teng .......................... .. D16/326

D561,811 S

2/2008 FOX et al.

13561313 5

2/2008 Baden et a1.

D565,088 S

3/2008 Baden et a1.

D572,747 S

14 Years

7/2008 Baden et a1.

D581,450 s

11/2008 Moritz

D586,379 S

(21)

May 8, 2012

BafienaIrV1neCA(US);PeterYee
(73) Assignee: Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA (US)
**

*4.

D536,027 S

(75) Inventors: Jae Shin, Irvine, CA (US); Colin

US D659,182 S

(45) Date of Patent:

APP1- NO-I 29/400,739

2/2009 ThiXton et al.

D595,333 s
D599,838 S

Aug. 31, 2011

6/2009 MarkovitZ et al.


*

D616,015 S

9/2009

Rohrbach .................. .. D16/326

(22)

Filed:

(51)

LOC (9) Cl.

................................................ .. 16-06

13623217 S

90010 Markovitz et a1

(52)

U.S. Cl. .................................... .. D16/326; D16/335

D629,830 S

12/2010 Markovitz et a1.

(58)

Field of Classi?cation Search ............... .. D16/101,


.

D622,302 S

2/441 4347437 13 15; 132N483


See application ?le for complete search history.

8/2010 Yee

g *

?arllioviiz ~t~~~~l ------------ -- 1316/326

D652,442 S *

1/2012 Yee et al. ................... .. D16/326

D16/3gggiffffoglDgg/g9ggob2Diggl 1102i

351/140, 153, 45446, 2/4264432, 4474449,

5/2010 MarkovitZ et a1.

BI

0V1 Z e

a .

* cited by examiner

Primary Examiner * Raphael Barkai


(74) Attorney Agent or Firm * Knobbe Martens Olson &

Bear, LLP
(56)

References Cited

(57)
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
D150,924 S
9/1948 Bright
D158,963 S
D192,885 S
D218,569 S

6/1950 Jonassen
5/1962 Petitto
9/1970 McCracken

D300,226 S

3/1989 Ramp

D309,149 S
D309,618 S
D330,395 S

7/1990 Pouilloux
7/1990 Evans
10/1992 Simioni

D342,080 S

12/1993 Cargle

5,537,161 A
D380,766 S
5,712,697 A

7/1996 Monroe
7/1997 Simioni
1/1998 Walton

D390,864 S

2/1998 Mage

D399,238 S
D409,222 S

10/1998 Simioni
5/1999 Raub

D427,622 S

7/2000 Conway

D457,182 S
D468,337 S

5/2002 Rask
1/2003 Chen

D514,615 S

2/2006 Mangum

CLAIM

The ornamental design for an eyeglass and eyeglass compo


nent, as shoWn and described.

DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 is a front perspective vieW of an eyeglass and eyeglass

component of the present invention;


FIG. 2 is a front elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 3 is a rear elevational vieW thereof;
FIG. 4 is a left side elevational vieW thereof, the right side

elevational vieW being a mirror image thereof;


FIG. 5 is a top plan vieW thereof; and,
FIG. 6 is a bottom plan vieW thereof.
The broken line portions of the drawings are for illustrative

purposes only and form no part of the claimed design.

1 Claim, 4 Drawing Sheets

67

Exhibit N

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 83 of 86

US. Patent

May 8, 2012

Sheet 1 of4

68

US D659,182 S

Exhibit N

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 84 of 86

69

Exhibit N

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 85 of 86

US. Patent

May 8, 2012

Sheet 3 of4

70

US D659,182 S

Exhibit N

Case 3:16-cv-01730-MMA-BGS Document 1-2 Filed 07/05/16 Page 86 of 86

US. Patent

May 8, 2012

Sheet 4 of4

71

US D659,182 S

Exhibit N

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen