Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
v.
Deric B. HOLLINGS, Private First Class
U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant
No. 07-0084
Crim. App. No. 200500497
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Argued May 1, 2007
Decided June 19, 2007
BAKER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which EFFRON,
C.J., and ERDMANN, STUCKY, and RYAN, JJ., joined.
Counsel
For Appellant:
Military Judges:
The
an unpublished opinion.
We granted
He
He
diaries was a job that a legal officer could do and usually did,
he stated that it was a job that a personnel officer was
required to do.
Hollings, No.
He further
argues that Westfall should have been removed for cause on the
ground of implied bias and that in denying Appellants challenge
for cause, the military judge failed to adhere to the liberal
grant mandate.
Westfall did not meet this definition and he did not act in this
case as the legal officer.
According to
He
In
officer and went to the Naval Justice School for the legal
officers course in 1990 or 1991.
legal officer.
He then assisted
There is no
A military
Id.
R.C.M.