Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
their learning.
Clearly, they place the locus of control of their social network use and online
gaming and its effect outside of these two factors and in their own
personalities.
Recommendation
After
interpretation
and
analysis
of
data
gathered,
we
these
are
our
recommendations:
1
academic achievement.
It is necessary that the results of the study be re-analyzed and presented in
another paper. The overall consensus of the researchers is that more
research needs to be done and that questioned relationship between social
networking sites, online gaming and academic performance remains largely
unanswered.
The use of internet for social networking sites and online gaming is a multifaceted phenomenon where there are many factors that can influence each
other. This research only exposes the top of the iceberg, but as with all
icebergs-though we cannot see what is under the tip, we know it is there and
we know that it can cause damage if not heeded.
51
REFERENCES
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and
scholarship.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.
Retrieved
October
15,2011,
from
http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
Cheong, I. (2009, April 14). Study shows college students who use Facebook may
earn lowerPAs. Retrieved October 13, 2011, from
http://www.collegenews.com/index.php?/article/study_shows_that_college_students_
who_use_facebook_gets_lower_gpas_041420098383/
Chowdhry, A. (2009, April 14). Ohio State Researcher Aryn Karpinski Conducts Study
Concluding Facebook Causes Lower Grades. Retrieved October 12, 2011, from
http://pulse2.com/2009/04/14/ohio-state-researcher-aryn-karpinski-conducts-studyconcluding-facebook-causes-lower-grades
Davis, M.R. (2008, June 9). Friend or Foe? Balancing the Good and Bad of SocialNetworkingSites. Retrieved October 12, 2011 from
http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2008/06/09/01networks.h02.html
Facebook has no negative effects on academic grade (2009, May 8). Retrieved
October 13, 2011,from http://www.healthlibrary.com/news2501.htm
Freedman, T. (2009, February 29). Can social networking sites affect your ability to
concentrate,communicate and feel empathy?. Retrieved October 12, 2011, from
http://terry-freedman.org.uk/artman/publish/article_1474.php
Folwer, F. J. (2002). Survey research methods. (3 rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52
Good, R. (2007, November 9). Online Social Networking And Education: Study
Reports On New
Generations Social And Creative Interconnected Lifestyles. Retrieved October 13,
2011,from
http://www.masternewmedia.org/learning_educational_technologies/socialnetworking/social-networking-in-education-survey-on-new-generations-socialcreative-and-interconnected-lifestyles-NSBA-20071109.htm
Marklein, M.B. (2009, April 13). Facebook use linked to less textbook time. Retrieved
October
13, 2011, from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2009-04-13-facebookgrades_N.htm#uslPageReturn
McCarthy, C. (2009, April 15). Students Who Use Social Networking Site Spend Less
Time On
Schoolwork, Study Finds. Facebook Bad for the Brain? Retrieved October 13, 2009,
from:
http://cbs4denver.com/watercooler/facebook.student.performance.2.985396.html
Mental Risk of Facebook teens (2008, July 3). Retrieved October 12, 2011, from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7487723.stm
Ratner, J. (n.d.). Education, Family Background, Key Factors Determining Economic
Mobility.
53
The Northwestern University, Red Orbit (2009, May 8). Fresh Look At Facebook And
Grades.
RetrievedOctober 13, 2011, from
http://www.redorbit.com/news/education/1685390/fresh_look_at_facebook_and_grad
es/i
ndex.html
Weiler, J. (2006, June). Social Networking Sites: Keeping Students Safe. Retrieved
October 13,
2011, from
http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Membership/SIGs/SIG_Newsletter/Archi
ves/200612/june4/SIG_News_June_2006_Social_Networking_Sites_Keeping_Students
_Safe.htm
Willard, N. (2009, December 12). Schools and Online Social Networking. Retrieved
October 12,
2011, from http://www.education-world.com/a_issues/issues/issues423.shtml
54
55
56
ANNEX C: QUESTIONNAIRE
Section I:
Name: ______________
Year Level/Section:_______
Age:________
Gender:___________
Section 2:
1
2
Please provide us with your General Weighted Average (GWA) for the 1 st
semester AY 2011-2012: _____________
How many hours do you spend studying in a day?
o 1 hour and below
o 2-4 hours
o 5 hours and beyond
What extracurricular activities are you engaged in?
o Theatre Arts (acting, singing, dancing)
o Literature-related (reading and writing)
o Sports
o Club participations
None
Section 3:
1
At an average, how many hours do you spend on social networking sites per
day?
o 10 hours and beyond
o 5-9 hours
o 2-5 hours
o 1 hour and below
At an average, how many hours do you spend on online gaming per day?
o 10 hours and beyond
o 5-9 hours
o 2-5 hours
o 1 hour and below
Which social networking site do you visit frequently?
o Facebook
o Twitter
o Others ______
What kind of computer games do you subscribe to?
o Facebook games (Farmville, Cityville, Restaurant City, Sims Social etc)
o Massive Multiplayer Role Playing Games (Warcraft)
o First-person shooter games (Counterstrike)
o Adult/gambling/erotic games (Poker Online)
57
o
o
Section 4:
1
2
3
6
7
Section 5:
1
2
3
6
7
Do you find it hard to concentrate on your schoolwork knowing that you can
play computer games?
o Yes
o No
Compare your grades before you become engaged in computer games and
after you have become involved. Do you see a drop in your academic
performance?
o Yes
o No
Do you think you are addicted to computer games?
o Yes
o No
Do you think your time for studying is reduced because of the time you spent
for online games?
o Yes
o No
ANNEX D: COMPUTATIONS
A
(High
SNS, High
Gaming)
A2
B
(Moderate
SNS, High
Gaming)
B2
C
(Low
SNS,
High
Gamin
g
C2
D
(Low
Gami
ng,Hi
gh
SNS)
D2
(Low
gaming,
moderat
e SNS)
Low
gaming,
low SNS
59
2.7
7.29
2.4
5.76
2.9
8.41
2.5
6.25
2.6
6.76
2.9
8.41
2.7
7.29
2.6
6.76
2.5
6.25
2.5
6.25
2.2
4.84
2.8
7.84
2.9
8.41
2.8
7.84
2.8
7.84
2.6
6.76
2.8
7.84
2.6
6.76
2.8
7.84
2.9
8.41
2.8
7.84
2.9
8.41
2.9
8.41
2.7
7.29
2.8
7.84
2.8
7.84
2.6
6.76
2.7
7.29
2.9
8.41
2.5
6.25
2.7
7.29
2.8
7.84
2.8
7.84
2.7
7.29
2.8
7.84
2.7
7.29
2.6
6.76
2.5
6.25
2.8
7.84
2.4
5.76
2.8
7.84
2.8
7.84
2.9
8.41
2.6
6.76
27.1
73.87
8.20777
8
26.5
71.67
27.9
27.9
78.21
27.7
77.07
5.9725
9.3
78.23
3.129
2
27.9
2.208333
77.95
25.983
33
1.116
3.1284
1.108
3.0828
3.011111
734.41
165
702.25
778.41
1.116
778.4
1
27225
544.5
A+D
55
3025
A+B+C
81.5
B+E
54.4
2959.36
D+E+F
83.5
C+F
55.6
3091.36
SUM
778.41
767.29
457
SUM
9075.72
6642.
25
6972.
25
1361
4.5
567.2
708
567.2325
457
- (X)2
N
-
(165)2
60
3.25
- (A2+B2+C2+D2+E2+F2)
60
X2
S
=
457
n
(27.1)2 + (26.5)2 + (27.9)2 +(27.9)2 +(27.7)2
10
S
=
3.082
Sc
Sc
(27.1+27.9)2 + (26.5+27.9)2
(27.9+27.7)2
= 10*2
Sc
(X)2
N
(165)2
60
0.036
Sr
(A+B+C)2 + (D+E+F)2
= n*3
Sr
(27.1+26.5+27.9)2
+(27.9+27.9+27.7)2
=
30
Sr
(x)2
N
(165)2
60
0.0667
c-
= SSt-SSw-SSc-SSr
c-
= 3.25-3.082-0.036-0.0667
61
c-
0.0653
62