Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Page | 5
Page | 6
If the city or municipality where the offense was committed has no PLEB, the
citizens complaint shall be filed with the regional or provincial office of the
Commission nearest the residence of the complainant.
Complaints involving breach of internal discipline as defined in Section 1(d)
Rule 1 of these Rules shall be filed with the proper PNP disciplinary authority
pursuant to Section 41(b) of R.A. No. 6975 as amended.
Sec. 2. Jurisdiction over Citizens Complaint. The following shall have
jurisdiction over citizens complaint:
a) Chiefs of Police, where the offense charged is punishable by withholding of
privileges, restriction to specified limits, suspension or forfeiture of salary, or
any combination thereof, for a period not exceeding fifteen (15) days.
b) Mayors of cities or municipalities, where the offense charged is punishable
by withholding of privileges, restriction to specified limits, suspension or
forfeiture of salary, or any combination thereof, for a period of not less than
sixteen (16) days but not exceeding thirty (30) days;
c) Peoples Law Enforcement Board, where the offense charged is punishable
by withholding of privileges, restriction to specified limits, suspension or
forfeiture of salary, or any combination thereof, for a period not exceeding
thirty (30) days; or dismissal, forced resignation or demotion of rank.
The jurisdiction of the PLEB to hear and decide citizens complaint pertains to
complaints of private individuals against PNP men and not by PNP men
against their co-members or officers in a professional capacity, except, when
they filed such a complaint in their private capacity and not as members of
the PNP.
Sec. 3. Principle of Exclusivity. A complaint or a charge filed against a PNP
member shall be heard and decided exclusively by the disciplinary authority
who first acquired original jurisdiction over the case, notwithstanding the
existence of concurrent jurisdiction as regards the offense: Provided, That
offenses which carry higher penalties referred to a disciplinary authority shall
be forwarded to the appropriate authority which has jurisdiction over the
offense.
Sec. 4. When Respondent is a Presidential Appointee. All uniformed police
officers, who are presidential appointees, may be suspended or removed
from office only for cause and by order of the President. Administrative
cases involving such officers shall be investigated by the PLEB in accordance
with the procedure prescribed under these Rules after prior clearance from
the President, through the Executive Secretary, pursuant to Presidential
Memorandum Order No. 41 dated November 7, 2001. The Report of
Investigation of the PLEB shall be submitted to the Office of the President,
through the Commission, for disposition.
RULE IV
PROCEDURE
Page | 7
Page | 8
mail. Said envelope shall be kept and made an integral part of the records of
the case.
No motion to dismiss, motion for bill of particulars or any other
interlocutory motion shall be allowed hence, filing of the same shall not
interrupt the running of the reglementary period for filing an answer.
Sec. 6. Effect of Failure / Refusal To File Answer. Failure of the
respondent to file an answer within the reglementary period shall be
considered as a general denial of the charges.
Sec. 7. Effect of Admission By Respondent. When the respondent in
his answer admits his culpability to the charge, the PLEB shall, nonetheless,
proceed with the hearing in order to determine the degree of his
responsibility, and the appropriate penalty to be imposed.
Sec. 8. Pre-Hearing Conference. Within five (5) days from receipt of
the answer, the PLEB shall summon the parties to a pre-hearing conference
for the purpose of: a) defining and simplifying the issues of the case; b)
entering into admissions and/or stipulation of facts; c) limiting the number of
witnesses to be presented; d) scheduling the dates of hearing; and e)
threshing out all other matters relevant to the case.
The conference shall be completed in one (1) day and the proceedings
thereof shall be duly recorded and signed by the parties and/or counsels.
Where the parties are represented by counsel, the latter shall be made to
sign and/or file a certificate of readiness to appear at the scheduled
hearings. In said certification, the date of hearing agreed upon by both
counsels shall be strictly followed to avoid unnecessary delay in the
proceeding.
In no circumstance shall there be an amicable settlement of the case.
Sec. 9. Hearing Proper. Within five (5) days from the termination of
the conference, the PLEB shall proceed with the formal hearing of the case.
The parties and their witnesses shall be duly notified of the scheduled
hearing at least three (3) days before the date thereof, specifying the date,
time, and place of hearing.
At the start of the hearing, the Chairman of the PLEB shall ask for the
appearance of the parties and inquire if they are ready to proceed with the
presentation of their evidence.
Sec. 10. Order of Hearing. The order of the hearing before the PLEB
shall be as follows:
a) The complainant shall adduce evidence with proper identification and
marking thereof of his exhibits;
b) The respondent shall then present evidence in support of his defense with
proper identification and marking thereof of his exhibits;
Page | 9
Page | 10
Page | 11
(B) Where the decision of the PLEB involves the penalty of withholding of
privileges, restriction, suspension, forfeiture of salary or fine, demotion, or
forced resignation, the same shall become final and executory only after the
lapse of ten (10) days from the receipt of a copy thereof by the respondent
unless the latter files a motion for reconsideration or appeal within said
period in which case, the resolution on the motion or appeal shall become
final and executory only after the lapse of ten (10) days from receipt of a
copy of said resolution by the respondent (C) However, where the decision of
the PLEB involves the penalty of dismissal, the same shall be immediately
executory upon receipt of a copy thereof by the respondent as furnished to
him by his/her immediate superior officer. The filing of a motion for
reconsideration or appeal as the case may be, within the reglementary
period of ten (10) days shall not suspend the implementation thereof.
Sec. 26. Application of the Principle of Res Judicata/Bar by Prior
Judgment. For a prior judgment in an administrative case to constitute a bar
to a subsequent administrative action, the following requisites must concur:
a) It must be a final judgment or order;
b) The Disciplinary Authority rendering the same must have jurisdiction over
the subject matter and over the parties;
c) It must be a judgment on the merits; and ,
d) There must be between the two (2) cases, identity of parties, identity of
subject matter and identity of cause of action.
Sec. 27. Motion for Reconsideration. The respondent may file a
motion for reconsideration from the decision rendered by the PLEB within ten
(10) days from receipt of a copy of the decision based on the following
grounds:
1) Newly discovered evidence which, if presented, would materially affect the
decision rendered; or
2) Errors of law or irregularities have been committed prejudicial to the
substantial rights and interest of the movant.
Only one (1) motion for reconsideration shall be allowed and the same
shall be considered and decided by the PLEB within fifteen (15) days from
receipt thereof.
Sec. 28. Service of Decision. Copies of the decisions, orders and
resolutions issued by the PLEB shall be served either personally or by
registered mail. Whenever possible service of decisions and other papers
shall be done personally.
Sec. 29. Maintenance of Docket Books. The PLEB shall keep a docket
book for administrative complaints in which all complaints shall be properly
entered adn given their corresponding number in the order of their receipt.
The docket book shall contain the following records:
Page | 13
Page | 14
e. Oppression
f. Dishonesty
g. Disloyalty to the Government
h. Violation of Law
Sec. 2. Definition of Offenses. The foregoing offenses are defined as
follows:
a. Neglect of duty or Nonfeasance is the omission or refusal, without
sufficient excuse, to perform an act or duty which was the peace officers
legal obligation to perform; it implies a duty as well as its breach.
b. Irregularity in the Performance of Duty is the improper
performance of some acts, which might lawfully be done.
c. Misconduct or Malfeasance is the doing, either through ignorance,
inattention or malice, of that which the officer had no legal right to do at all,
as where he acts without any authority whatsoever, or exceeds, ignores or
abuses his powers.
Misconduct generally means wrongful, improper or unlawful conduct,
motivated by premeditated, obstinate or intentional purpose. It usually
refers to transgression of some established and definite rule of action, where
no discretion is left except what necessity may demand; it does not
necessarily imply corruption or criminal intention but implies wrongful
intention and not to mere error of judgment.
d. Incompetence is the manifest lack of adequate ability and
fitness for the satisfactory performance of police duties. This has reference
to any physical, moral or intellectual quality the lack of which
substantially incapacitates one to perform the duties of a peace officer.
e. Oppression imports an act of cruelty, severity, unlawful exaction,
domination, or excessive use of authority. The exercise of unlawful powers
or other means, in depriving an individual of his liberty or property against
his will, is generally an act of oppression.
f. Dishonesty is the concealment or distortion of truth in a matter of
fact relevant to ones office, or connected with the performance of his duties.
g. Disloyalty to the Government consists of abandonment or
renunciation of ones loyalty to the Government of the Philippines,or
advocating the overthrow of the government.
h. Violation of Law presupposes final conviction in court of any crime
or offense penalized under the Revised Penal Code or any special law or
ordinance.
RULE VII
Page | 16
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES
Section 1. Imposable Penalties. The following are the penalties that
may be imposed by the PLEB in police administrative cases:
a. Withholding of privileges
b. Restriction to specified limits
c. Suspension
d. Forfeiture of salary or fine
e. Demotion
f. Forced Resignation
g. Dismissal
Sec. 2. Limitation in the Imposition of Penalties. If the penalty of
suspension is imposed by the PLEB, the same shall not exceed ninety (90)
days; and in case of forfeiture of salary the amount shall not exceed the
equivalent of one (1) month pay.
Should the penalty of demotion be imposed it shall not exceed one
rank lower.
On the other hand, the penalty of Withholding of Privileges shall be
confined to deferment of vacation leave privileges, availment of loan
privileges and participation in training grants or programs and such other
similar privileges normally enjoyed by civil service employees.
Sec. 3. Qualifying Circumstances. In the determination of penalties to
be imposed, mitigating and aggravating circumstances attendant to the
commission of the offense/s shall be considered.
A. The following are mitigating circumstances:
a. physical illness
b. good faith
c. length of service in the government
d. analogous circumstances
B. The following are aggravating circumstances:
a. taking advantage of official position
b. taking undue advantage of subordinate
c. undue disclosure of confidential information
Page | 17
ROGELIO A. PUREZA
Commissioner
Vice-Chairperson and Executive Officer
EDGAR DULA TORRES
Commissioner
LINDA L. MALENAB-HORNILLA
Commissioner
HERMOGENES EBDANE, JR.
Commissioner
Attested by:
ROSALINDA CRUZ
Acting Board Secretary
Page | 20