Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Upstream pollution
prevention and waste
management
CGE686
Learning outcome
3/24/2016
Contents
Produced water
3/24/2016
Produced water
Produced Water
Also known as
Brine
Saltwater
Sources of this water from an oil reservoir may include flow from
above or below the hydrocarbon zone
within the hydrocarbon zone
injected fluids and additives resulting from production activities
Also known as connote water or formation water
3/24/2016
1. Produced Water
In the production of natural gas produced water is separated from the gas at or
near the wellhead
Additional water is also injected into the reservoir to
Sustain pressure
Achieve greater recovery levels
3/24/2016
Producers need to pay between $3 and $12 per barrel to dispose of produced
water
3/24/2016
The cost of managing produced water is a significant factor in the profitability of oil and
gas production.
The cost of managing any residuals or byproducts resulting from the treatment of
produced water
Permitting, monitoring, and reporting costs
Transportation costs.
Once these cost exceeds the value of the hydrocarbon produced from the well, the well is
usually shut down.
3. Location of well
Open hole permits testing of drilling zones and avoids drilling into water
But perforated completion method offers better control
3/24/2016
Different methods are used to reduced the costs of lifting and/or water
handling for wells that produced large quantities of saline water.
Such as:
Water shut-off treatment using gelled polymer
Reducing beams pump lifting costs
Power options for reduce electricity costs
Separation technologies
3/24/2016
Types of
hydrocarbon
produced
Lifetime of
the reservoir
Factors
affecting
characteristics
of PW
Geographic
location of
the field
Geological
formation
3/24/2016
3/24/2016
226radium
Barium
& 228radium
10
3/24/2016
Production solids
Formation solids
Asphaltenes
Inorganic crystalline substances such SiO2, Fe2O3, Fe3O4 and BaSO4 are found in
the suspended solids
11
3/24/2016
Dissolved gases
CO2
O2
H2S
12
3/24/2016
Discharge to
Surface Water
Underground
Injection
Air Emissions
13
3/24/2016
Discharge to
Surface Water
14
3/24/2016
15
3/24/2016
16
3/24/2016
Water minimisation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
17
3/24/2016
The effectiveness in mechanically blocking the water from entering the well depends
on the type of reservoir and well construction. Examples of mechanical blocking
Straddle packers
Bridge plugs
Tubing patches
Cement
Chemical treatment polymers are used to shut off water-bearing channel or
fractures within the formation.
DOWS is restricted to type of wells.
Limitations - the produced water must be treated to meet certain quality levels
to
Prevent plugging of wellbore
Prevent plugging of reservoir pores
Prevent system failure
18
3/24/2016
Soluble
organics
removal
Desalination
Disinfection
Suspended
solids removal
Softening
Miscellaneous:
Removing
NORM
19
3/24/2016
Adsorption
Sand filters
Cyclones
Evaporation
Dissolved air
precipitation
C-Tour
Freezethaw/evaporation
Electrodialysis
Chemical
Chemical
precipitation
Chemical oxidation
Electrochemical
process
Photocatalytic
treatment
Fenton process
Treatment with
ozone
Room temperature
ionic liquids
Demulsifier
Biological
Aerobic
Anaerobic
Membrane
Microfiltration (MF)
Ultrafiltration (UF)
Nanofiltraion (NF)
Reverse osmosis (RO)
20
3/24/2016
21
3/24/2016
22
3/24/2016
General PW treatment
23
3/24/2016
Combination system
24
3/24/2016
Adsorption
25
3/24/2016
Adsorption theory
Liquid
Gas/ Vapor
Definition
Adsorption is a process
whereby a gas or liquid
(adsorbate) accumulates on
the surface of a solid
(adsorbent) to form a
molecular or atomic film.
Adsorption
26
3/24/2016
ADSORBENT
Shape
Small pellets, beads, granules, cylindrical, powders
Size ranging from 50 m to 1.2 cm
Porous structure
Macropore ( > 500) 50 nm
Mesopore (20 - 500 )
Micropore ( < 20 )
Based on International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)
Specific surface area: 300 to 1,200 m2/g
27
3/24/2016
Schematic of carbon
contactor.
By EARTH Canada
Corporation.
TORR Total Oil
Remediation and
Recovery
28
3/24/2016
MECHANISM:ADSORPTION
MECHANISM: ADSORPTION
58
29
3/24/2016
MECHANISM: ADSORPTION
Physical adsorption
Monolayer or multilayer
Chemisorption
Covalent bonds
High heat of adsorption
Highly specific
Monolayer only
May involve dissociation
Possible over a wide range of
temperature
Activated, may be slow and
irreversible
Electron transfer leading to bond
formation between sorbate and
surface.
59
MECHANISM: ADSORPTION
60
30
3/24/2016
61
62
31
3/24/2016
MECHANISM: DESORPTION
Adsorption-Saturated-Desorption
63
MECHANISM: DESORPTION
Regeneration process:
To recover Adsorbate
To reuse Adsorbent
Bed regeneration method (cyclic system)
Temperature-swing adsorption (TSA)
Pressure-swing adsorption (PSA)
64
32
3/24/2016
MECHANISM:TEMPERATURE SWING
ADSORPTION (TSA)
Increase in temperature
65
66
33
3/24/2016
Cycle Steps
1. Adsorption at T1 to
breakthrough
2 ways:
Reduction in the system total pressure
Introduction of an inert gas while maintaining the total system pressure
Cycle time very quick (minutes or second)
68
34
3/24/2016
69
35
3/24/2016
71
72
36
3/24/2016
73
Data is plotted as
adsorption isotherms
Concentration of a
solute in a solid phase
74
37
3/24/2016
Adsorption isotherms
q, kg adsorbate / kg adsorbent
c, kg adsorbate / m3 fluid
75
Adsorption Isotherms
The relationship between the concentration of solute in fluid phase and its
concentration on the solid.
76
38
3/24/2016
q = Kc (12.1-1)
c : concentration (fluid is liquid)
77
K = Freundlich constant
n = constant
Determined
experimentally
c = equilibrium concentration
The dimensions for K depends on the value of
n.
78
39
3/24/2016
qc
q 0
K c
K, q0 = constant
c = equilibrium concentration
Batch tests were performed in the laboratory using solutions of phenol in water
and particles of granular activated carbon. The equilibrium data at room
temperature are shown in the table below. Determine the isotherm that fits the
data.
(kg
phenol/m3
0.322
solution)
0.117
0.039
0.0061
0.0011
0.059
0.045
40
3/24/2016
Solution
BATCH ADSORPTION
where:
qF = initial concentration of solute on the solid
q = final concentration at equilibrium
M = amount of adsorbent, kg
S = volume of feed solution, m3
82
41
3/24/2016
83
Solution
Information given:
cF = 0.21 kg phenol/m3
qF = 0 (assumed)
% phenol extracted =
100 = 70.5
q = 0.199c0.229
S = 1.0 m3
M = 1.40 kg carbon
qF M + cF S = q M + cS
42
3/24/2016
85
Concentration Profiles
Fluid to be treated passed down through the packed bed at a constant flow rate
Concentration of solute in the fluid phase and of the solid adsorbent phase
change with time and position MTZ
86
43
3/24/2016
87
At t2;
At tb;
t1
0.5
0
At t1;
mass-transfer
zone
H1
t2
tb
t3
H2
Height of adsorption bed, H
H3
HT
Typical solute conc. profiles for fluid as a function of distance through the bed at increasing times t1, t2
and tB from start of the flow through bed.
no part of bed is saturated
the bed is almost saturated for a distance H1. At H2 the bed is still clean. The region H1 and H2 is the
mass transfer zone, where adsorption takes place.
the leading point of mass transfer zone just reach the end of the bed. This is called breakthrough
point.
88
44
3/24/2016
mass-transfer
zone
c/c0
0.5
0
t1
t2
t3
break point,
cb
t4
tb
cd
t6
Ratio of outlet solute concentration to inlet solute concentration in the fluid as a function of time from the
start of flow. The S-shaped curve is called the breakthrough curve.
Prior to tb, the outlet solute concentration is less than the maximum allowable of c/c0 between 0.01 to
0.05.
At tb this value is reached. The adsorption step should be discontinued.
If the adsorption step is allowed to be continued for t>tB , the outlet solute concentration would be
observed to rise rapidly, eventually approaching the inlet concentration as the outlet end of the bed
became saturated.
89
90
45
3/24/2016
Evaporation
Evaporation
Evaporation
46
3/24/2016
93
Solubility
94
47
3/24/2016
95
Foaming or frothing
96
48
3/24/2016
97
Scale deposition
98
49
3/24/2016
Materials of construction
99
Evaporation
The basic factors that affect the rate of evaporation are the:
rate at which heat can be transferred to the liquid
quantity of heat required to evaporate each kg of water
maximum allowable temperature of the liquid
pressure at which the evaporation takes place
changes that may occur in the solution during the course of the evaporation
process
Methods
50
3/24/2016
51
3/24/2016
Saturated Steam S, Ts , Hs
Vapor V, yV T1, HV
V is pure solvent,
yV = 0
Condensate S, TS, hs
Refer to Geankoplis C. J. Transport Processes and Separation Proces Principles, 4th Edition
52
3/24/2016
=
(1)
V is in equilibrium with L, the
temperatures are the same (T1)
T1 at the concentrated liquid side is at
boiling point with a saturation vapor
pressure of P1
Assume that the system is at steady state
rate of mass in = rate of mass out
53
3/24/2016
q U AT UA(Ts T1 ) (6)
Example
54
3/24/2016
Material balance:
FxF = LxL
F = 9072 kg/h
9072(0.01) = L(0.015)
L = 6048 kg/h
V = 3024 kg/h
Latent heat of
condensation at
Ts
Latent heat of
evaporation at T1
55
3/24/2016
Find hF & hL
Find
hF = cpF(TF T1)
hs = 461.3 kJ/kg
TF = 311 K (given)
hL = CpL(T1 TBP)
TS = 383.2 K (100C)
Hs = 2691.5 kJ/kg
= 2230.2 kJ/kg
TBP = T1 hL = 0
Find HV
Find S
= 2257 kJ/kg
56
3/24/2016
Find q
q = S
q = 2 544 000 W
Finally, find A
q U AT UA(Ts T1 )
A = 149.3 m2
Steam Economy
3024
= 0.736
4108
57
3/24/2016
2. Effect of pressure
58
3/24/2016
For a given pressure, the boiling point of an aqueous solution is higher than that
of pure water. The increase in boiling point over that of water is known as the
boiling point rise (BPR)
BPR = Boiling point of water at a given pressure Boiling point of solution (refer
Duhring Diagram)
NaCl-Water System
59
3/24/2016
Example
Injection
Injection of produced
water into the same
formation from which
the oil is produced or
handle to another
formation.
Discharge
60
3/24/2016
61
3/24/2016
2. DRILLING FLUID
The key to making the rotary drilling system work is the ability to circulate a fluid
continuously down through the drill pipe, out through the bit nozzles and back
to the surface.
Purpose of Drilling Fluids
1. Cooling and lubrication. As the bit drills into the rock formation, the friction
caused by the rotating bit against the rock generate heat. The heat is dissipated
by the circulating drilling fluid. The fluid also lubricates the bit.
2. DRILLING FLUID
3. Suspend cuttings. There are times when circulation has to be stopped. The
drilling fluid must have that gelling characteristics that will prevent drill cuttings
from settling down at the bit. This may caused the drill pipe to be stuck.
4. Pressure control. The drilling mud can be the first line of defense against a
blowout or loss of well control caused by formation pressures.
The hydrostatic head produced by the mud in psi is = 0.052 x G x H
where G = density of mud in ppg
62
3/24/2016
2. DRILLING FLUID
This hydrostatic head will counter the formation pressure in order to avoid a
blowout while drilling. For example, lets say a well is being drilled in a salt-water
basin (pressure gradient of 0.465 psi/ft), the pressure in the formation at 10,000
feet would be expected to be:
10,000 x 0.465 = 4,650 psi
2. DRILLING FLUID
5. Data source. The cuttings that the drilling mud brings to the
surface can tell the geologist the type of formation being drilled.
6. To wall the hole with impermeable filter cake. This will give a
temporary support to the wall of the borehole from collapsing
during drilling.
63
3/24/2016
64
3/24/2016
2. DRILLING FLUID
65
3/24/2016
Pneumatic
Diesel oil
Mineral oil
Synthetic Fluid
Colloidal clay
Clay and polymer
Polymer
Dry gas
Mist
Foam
Gasified Mud
Component
Water
Bentonite
Caustic soda
Soda ash
High viscosity cmc
Low viscosity cmc
Barite
Quantity
1 bbl
20 ppb
0,5 ppb
0,5 ppb
1,5 ppb
3,5 ppb
160 ppb
Mass(kg)
159
9,1
0,23
0,23
0,68
1,59
72,58
Volume(L)
1588,99
9,07
0,22
0,10
0,47
1,09
17,28
%mass
65,33
3,73
0,9
0,9
0,28
0,65
29,82
%volume
84,92
4,85
0,12
0,5
0,25
0,58
9,23
66
3/24/2016
Composition of a typical oil based mud density 1318 kg/m3 , salinity 22.5%, oil to
water ratio 65:35. components combine to give a total volume of one barrel.(bbl:
barrel; ppb:pounds per barrel; gpb: gallons per barrel)
Component
Quantity
Base fluid
Viscosifier
Emulsifier 1
0,5 bbl
5 ppb
0,8 ppb
Lime
Water
CalCl2
Barite
5 ppb
0,30 ppb
30,2 ppb
167,9 ppb
Emulsifier 2
0,4 ppb
Mass(kg)
64,63
2,26
2,89
Volume(L)
1,49
2,26
47,15
13,70
76,15
%mass
83,31
1,40
3,02
30,37
1,08
1,38
1,00
47,22
3,35
18,16
1,08
22,50
6,54
36,34
1,51
0,71
%volume
52,40
0,88
1,90
0,95
0,63
29,70
2,11
11,42
67
3/24/2016
ADDITIVES
Various thickeners are used to influence the viscosity of the fluid, e.g. xanthan
gum, guar gum, glycol, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), polyanionic cellulose
(PAC), or starch.
Drilling wastes deserve special attention. The volume of drilling wastes usually ranges
from 1,000 to 5,000 m3 for each well. Such wells can number into dozens for one
production platform and many hundreds for a large field.
As a result of many technological operations and procedures, drilling muds and cuttings
are saturated with hundreds of very different substances and compounds.
It is their discharges into the sea that pose one of the main ecological threats during
offshore oil production.
In particular, many countries express concern regarding biocides, which are used to
suppress microflora in the drilling and other circulating fluids.
The list of such compounds includes over one hundred names. The most widespread
biocides used in the oil and gas production practice include sodium salts of hypochlorite,
formalin releasers, and glutaraldehyde as well as biguanidine and quaternary
ammonium, and a number of other compounds.
68
3/24/2016
The composition of some compounds is not always known. Some biocides are highly toxic. Many
countries either discourage (for example, in case of carbamates and thiocarbamates) or prohibit
(for example, in case of dichlorophenols and pentachlorophenates) their use by the offshore oil
and gas industry.
Drilling discharges also contain many heavy metals (mercury, lead, cadmium, zinc, chromium,
copper, and others) and NORM (Uranium, Thorium, Radium etc) that come from components of
both drilling fluids and drilling cuttings.
By using BIOASSAY.
138
69
3/24/2016
140
70
3/24/2016
Some of the techniques include pipe wipers and vacuuming of spills on the rig
floors
Pneumatic drilling (air, air/water)
Developing variations of fluids that are less toxic and easily to bio treatment.
Drilling practice that reduce the generation of drilling waste.
- Directional drilling
71
3/24/2016
Road spreading
One use of cuttings is to stabilize surfaces that are subject to erosion, such as
roads or drilling pads.
Reuse of Cuttings as Construction Material
Need to be treated to render the cuttings more innocuous
Used for
fill material,
daily cover material at landfills,
aggregate or filler in concrete, brick, or block manufacturing.
143
144
72
3/24/2016
Disposal
Pre treatment
Reduce the volume of the waste
Reduce the potential hazard of the
waste
Alter the state of the waste
(separate liquid and solid phases)
Disposal methods
Deep well disposal
Disposal liquid waste are injected
into a formation
-produced water, drilling
completion wastes
Evaporation pond
These pond facilitate the reduction
of waste volume through
evaporation
-drilling fluids
Thermal method
Use high temperature furnaces to
reclaim or destroy contaminated
material
-HC contaminated soil
145
Disposal
On-shore
To the sea
Reinjected into the disposal well
Off-shore
the waste fluids would be temporarily stored in earthen pits( on site or off-site
Eventually will be disposed into landfill
146
73
3/24/2016
147
This is to avoid the existence of ultrafine solids content in the mud that will
affect the fluids performance and general stability worn out mud that
needs to be disposed of.
Method to recover base oil from worn out mud.
74
3/24/2016
75
3/24/2016
76
3/24/2016
77
3/24/2016
3. MERCURY
A concern in oil & gas industry. Found in almost all oil and gas
reservoirs
Highest concentrations normally found from reservoirs in South
America, South East Asia, Easter europe
European/African/North American gas sources also contain mercury
Mercury is classified as hazardous substance with limited use
Mercury containing waste classified as hazardous waste
Hazardous waste management requires special license
78
3/24/2016
3. MERCURY
Organic
mercury
components
concentrations/partial pressures
3. MERCURY
occur
in
LOCATION
East Asia
58-193
N Europe
0.01-180
South America
North Africa
Middle East
N America
insignificant
69-119
0.3-130
1-9
0.005-0.04
79
3/24/2016
3. MERCURY
Corrosion/embrittlement
Precipitation(HgS)
Mechanisms
Fouling
Galvanic corrosion
3. MERCURY
80
3/24/2016
3. MERCURY
3. MERCURY
81
3/24/2016
3. MERCURY
Further reading
Mercury Removal Project: Issues and Challenges in Managing and Executing
a Technology Project 2007
Challenges in Managing Mercury in Malaysia 2009
4. NATURALLY OCCURRING
RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
(NORM)
82
3/24/2016
4. NORM
83
3/24/2016
5. HAZARDOUS WASTES
5. HAZARDOUS WASTES
84
3/24/2016
5. HAZARDOUS WASTES
General Definition - Hazardous Waste refers to residue of business and/or activity containing
hazardous materials which is directly and indirectly able to contaminate and/or damage the
environment, and/or endanger environment, health, performance of human and other creatures
due to its characteristics and/or concentration.
The Railroad Commission (US) has jurisdiction over oil and gas wastes, which include all wastes
generated in association with the following activities:
drilling, operation, and plugging of wells associated with the exploration, development, or production of oil and
gas, including oil and gas wells, fluid injection wells used in enhanced recovery projects, and disposal wells;
separation and treatment of produced fluids in the field or at natural gas processing plants;
storage of crude oil before it enters a refinery;
underground storage of hydrocarbons and natural gas;
transportation of crude oil or natural gas by pipeline;
solution mining of brine; and
storage, hauling, disposal, or reclamation of wastes generated by these activities.
5. HAZARDOUS WASTES
85
3/24/2016
5. HAZARDOUS WASTES
Air Division
86
3/24/2016
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
In Oil and gas industry, general categories of direct emissions sources are:
Production of heat, steam, or electricity, whether for use by the company or for sale to other
parties
Combustion in flares and incinerators
Production of work by engines and turbines, for example, to drive pumps or compressors
Physical or chemical process emission such as from gas processing, oil refining, and
petrochemical manufacture
Transportation in company-owned motor vehicles and vessels, such as tank trucks and oil
tankers
Fugitive losses from equipment leaks such as from gas pipeline systems
87
3/24/2016
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
Three main types of gas emissions in oil and gas industry, namely;
1.
2.
3.
Combustion gases consisting of carbon dioxides and minor amounts of carbon monoxide,
nitrous oxide, N2O, SO2 and uncombusted hydrocarbons (methane and VOC)
Hydrocarbons consisting of methane and mainly aliphatic VOCs vented to atmosphere or
escaping from the hydrocarbon processes through fugitive emissions
Releases of halon and other CFC gases from fire fighting and refrigeration systems.
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
88
3/24/2016
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
The assumed effect of emitted CFC gases to the depletion of the stratospheric ozone
layer has resulted in the Montreal Protocol (1985)
The Geneva Convention through its three protocols; the Helsinki protocol (1985), the
Sofia Protocol (1988), and the Geneva Protocol (1991), signed by almost all industrial
countries in Europe and North America, imposes obligations on the signature nations
to control and reduce their emissions of SOx, NOx, and VOC.
Norway government introduced a CO2 tax in 1991. This tax is now 0.80 NOK per Sm3
(3.20 USD/1000SCF) natural gas fueled or flared. A similar tax has to be paid for diesel
fuel. (Geir & Novatech, 1994)as for effectively 1 Jan 2013, the amount increased to
0.96 NOK per Sm3 (Environmental and climate considerationsin the Norwegian
petroleum Sector, 2013) to signify the importance of good management on the
gaseous emissions.
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
The most commonly reported greenhouse gases are those covered by the Kyoto Protocol:
Carbon Dioxide, CO2
Methane, CH4
Nitrous Oxide, N2O
Hydrofluorocarbons, HFCs
Perfluorocarbons, PFCs
Sulfur Hexafluoride, SF6
In addition to this list, some reporting programs, such as the national inventory reporting Program of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), include emissions of nitrogen oxides, carbon
monoxide, and non-methane volatile organic compounds when accounting for GHG emissions.
Compounds covered by the Montreal Protocol, such as chlorofluorocarbons and hydrochlorofluorocarbons,
are also sometimes included in GHG emissions inventories. While these compounds are also GHGs, they
currently receive relatively little attention as GHGs because they either have already been or are being
phased out for most applications
89
3/24/2016
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
It is recommended that companies within the petroleum industry account for and report
all significant emissions of each of the six GHGs listed above that fall within their
established organizational and operational boundaries. Virtually all companies within the
industry would be expected to have emissions of CO2 and to a lesser extent CH4 and
N2O since these gases are produced through combustion.
Both CH4 and CO2 are also part of the materials processed by the industry as they are
produced, in varying quantities, from gas and oil wells. Because the quantities of N2O
produced through combustion are quite small compared to the amount of CO2
produced, CO2 and CH4 are the predominant petroleum industry GHGs.
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
HFCs, PFCs and SF6 while not as closely associated with the petroleum industry as other
GHGs, may be emitted by various subsectors and operations. HFCs are increasingly used
in refrigeration systems, including virtually all motor vehicle air conditioners.
Both HFCs and PFCs may be used as solvents, and PFCs are used in some fire
extinguishing systems. PFCs are also emitted during the manufacture of aluminum and in
some semi-conductor manufacturing processes.
Sulfur hexafluoride is used in high-voltage electrical equipment and in the production
and casting of magnesium.
Since none of these emitting activities are core parts of the petroleum industry, total
emissions of these gases would be expected to be small. For particular facilities or
businesses in which petroleum industry companies have an interest, however, these
kinds of emissions may be significant.
90
3/24/2016
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
A large number of alternative reduction measures were identified, assessed and analysed. These measures
were grouped into 4 categories:
a)reduction of the energy demand
b)more efficient energy generation
c)extraction of CO2 from the exhaust gases
d)conversion to an alternative energy carrier
The first categories were evaluated against state-of-the-art technology used in other industries. Gas has
traditionally been a cheap and plentiful resource on the offshore oil and gas production platforms.
Consequently energy utilization has not been optimized as well as in some other industries. The following
measures within category a. and b. were found to contain the most interesting potentials for CO2 emission
reduction;
export gas pipeline optimization
gas turbine waste heat for heating purposes
combined cycle power plants
91
3/24/2016
6. GASEOUS EMISSIONS
Extraction of CO2 from the gas turbine exhaust gas, followed by disposal in subsurface formations or in
deep sea ocean layers has been proposed by research institutes as an interesting alternative to reduce the
CO2 emissions.
The technology has the potential to almost fully eliminate the energy generated CO2 emissions from
Norwegian offshore oil and gas production. It was therefore decided to evaluate the availability and
feasibility of this technology. The study concluded that technology exists, but the energy and space
requirements are very large, showing that a new and additional CO2 removal platform will be required on
each field if the technology should be applied on existing platforms, unless significant technology
improvements take place.
Hydroelectric power supply from shore, as an alternative to gas fuel, was also investigated. Except for a few
special cases, this alternative was found to be very uneconomic compared to conventional technology.
For the two latter cases, publically available documentation was established that may assist operators in
future evaluation of these reduction measures. Furthermore, the documentation can form a basis for a
constructive dialogue with authorities and other interesting parties.
92