2016 Washington County Comprehensive Plan - DRAFT

T
A
R
Sarah Whipple Photo
Plan Update 2016
UPDATE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
WASHINGTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS
WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE
Adopted September, 2016
Prepared by
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD

CHAIRMAN
David A. Meyer
Jeff Evans
Angie Lisk
Robert Gill
Kate Muenter*
Gary Suedmeyer
Alan Hohlt
Terri Kurwicki
Dave Ibendahl
Leo Barczewski
Willy Spenner
Eric Brammeier*
Doug Bening
Paul Todd
Victor Shubert*
* members of Washington County Planning Commission committee
WASHINGTON COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

CHAIRMAN
Gerald Brockmeier
Roger Weber
Joe Kula (Emeritus)
David Hake
Roy Bergmann
Brad Conant- County Farm Bureau
Mike Borrenpohl
Ron E. Brown
Jerry Waters
Donna Gale
Mitch Burdick-County Engineer
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE STEERING COMMITTEE

Rick Greten, Zoning Administrator
Mike Borrenpohl
Eric Brammeier
Gerald Brockmeier
Kevin Brink
Mitch Burdick
Brad Conant
Sharon Frederking
Donna Gale
Jamie Jones
David Karg
Larry Kuhlengel
Mark Martens
David Meyer - Ex Officio
Kate Muenter
Duane Mulholland
Jeff Oelze
Greg Toensing
Pamela Schellhorn, U of I Extension
Victor Shubert
Gera Armstrong Sims
Lisa Zoeckler
Andy Curry
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
2036 Vision Statement
PLANNING FRAMEWORK
Introduction
Purpose of Plan
Planning in Washington County
2016 Washington County Comprehensive Plan Process
The Work of the Washington County Plan Update Committee
Public Involvement in the Process
"S.W.O.T." Analysis
Land Use Strategy
2036 Perspective
Cooperative Planning
Values, Goals, Objectives and Policies
County-Wide Planning Goals
A GENERAL PROFILE
2
3
3
4
5
7
8
9
9
10
11
11
12
14
14
14
16
19
20
21
22
23
25
27
30
30
33
38
Geographic Setting
The Region
Demographics and Population Trends
A Brief History
Topography, Drainage, and Soils
Climate
Hydrology
Distinctive Features
Agricultural Land Uses
Other Extraction Land Uses
Open Space Preservation
Residential Development
Commercial and Industrial Development
Public and Semi-Public Land Uses
PLANNING ELEMENTS
Purpose
Recommended Land Use Strategies
Land Use Elements
Goal: Agricultural Presevation
Recommended Policies
Goal: Housing/Residential Development
Goal: Commercial and Industrial Development
39
39
39
42
43
46
47
49
50
53
Goal: Open Space, Recreation, and Environmental Resources

Goal: Historic Preservation
Goal: Transportation / Circulation
Recommended Polices
Goal: Community and Economic Development
Goal: Public Safety
Goal: Cooperative Planning
APPENDIX
Washington County 2036 Land Use Plan Map
Washington County Enterprise Zones and Special Features Map
SWOT Analysis Results
Coal Mines Directory and Coal Mines Map
Oil and Gas Fields and Wells
City of Nashville Enterprise Zone
City of Centralia Enterprise Zone and TIF Map
Research on Millenial Preferences by Pamela Schallhorn, M.A.
Public Survey Questions and Results
55
61
63
65
66
67
68
69
71
71
72
73
74
FIGURES AND TABLES

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Planning and Review Process

Washington County Comprehensive Plan Inputs
Geographic Setting
Population Trends
Washington County Population Pyramid
Washington County Relief
Washington County Land Cover from USGS
Coal Mines and Underground Industrial Mines
Washington County Oil and Gas Fields and Wells
Washington County Population Density
Washington County Labor Trends 1990-2015
St. Louis MO-IL 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
Table 1`
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Population By Township and Municipality

Washington County General Land Use
Market Value of Agricultural Products 2012
Washington County Farms 1959-2012 Historical View
Washington County Housing Stock
Washington County Labor Force Participation
2014 Economic Census: Industrial Statistic by NAICS
Southwestern IL Projected Growth Industries
Non-State Sales Taxes Distributed to Counties 2014
National Register of Historic Places Buildings
Page
6
7
15
17
18
21
24
28
29
32
34
53
16
24
26
26
31
33
35
36
37
64
Washington County 2036 Vision Statement
Washington County enjoys a diverse, stable economy while embracing and

preserving our rich agricultural heritage. Agriculture is our primary industry,
but we accommodate growth by conscientiously managing the way new
development should occur while preserving our rich farmland, natural resources
and woodlands; carefully exploiting our important energy reserves; and
maintaining a diverse approach to create a range of employment opportunities
and available housing. We value our youth, honor our seniors, and support our
families with a desire for all to thrive in a safe, pristine environment as one of
the premier rural counties in Illinois.
PLANNING FRAMEWORK
Introduction
This Comprehensive Plan for Washington County updates the 1999 Comprehensive Plan prepared
with the support of Southwestern Illinois Metropolitan and Regional Planning Commission
(SIMAPC). Because of changing conditions, updated information and development pressures it was
determined that the 1999 land use plan needed to be brought up to date. This responsibility
ultimately rests with the County Board and County Planning Commission, and the Washington
County Comprehensive Plan Update Committee was appointed. The Committee is an advisory body
to the County government and, in that role, is recommending this plan for adoption as the
Washington County Comprehensive Plan.
Purpose of Plan
Comprehensive land use planning provides the basis upon which more effective and informed
decision-making may take place. One of the principal contributions of the planning process is to
provide appropriate information for everyday decisions while considering the long range goals and
objectives. The planning process and the planning document provide public officials and interested
citizens with essential information about their region. In essence, the plan is an interpretation of this
data that outlines areas potential and perceived threats, and recommends policies required to
achieve the desired physical development.
The plan is not intended to be a rigid framework for future development but, rather, a broad outline
for harmonious and coordinated physical development. It will be used by the County Board, County
and municipal officials and administrators, developers, and the general public as a guide in the
decision-making relative to physical development.
The plan represents proposed policy
recommendations for adoption by the County Board and should be periodically revised as changing
conditions warrant. The plan shows the essential relationships which must be established and
preserved among the various public service facilities, as well as the uses of privately owned land if
desired community and area wide objectives are to be reached.
The primary function of the County Comprehensive Plan can be summarized as follows:
1. To provide a statement of public policy regarding the guidance and control of desirable
physical development within the County.
2. To provide the County Board with developmental policy guidelines to assist with decision
making on specific development issues and on future public expenditures.
3. To establish the framework for coordinated action between local units of government, as well
as coordinated action between these units of local government and state and federal units of
government.
4. To provide administrative continuity through successive County government administrations.
5. To educate the general public regarding possibilities in shaping future growth.

In the Comprehensive Plan the Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update Committee offers a
renewed starting point for a more efficient and attractive County for tomorrow.
The responsibilities of the Comprehensive Plan Update Committee are summarized as follows:
Participate in the preparation of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan and make
recommendations to the County Board through County Planning Commission with respect to
the plan.
Cooperate in the preparation of project plans in accordance with the official plan and make
recommendation to the County Board.
Assist municipal and County officials charged with the direction of projects for
improvements embraced within the Comprehensive Plan, to further the development of these
projects, and generally to promote the realization of the Comprehensive Plan.
Report to the County Board and Planning Commission on the status of the Comprehensive
Plan update and on the effectiveness of ordinances and regulations as they relate to the
Comprehensive Plan.
Transmit to the County Planning Commission and, ultimately, the County Board important
concerns, conditions, and proposals pertinent to the future development of the County.
Planning in Washington County

Comprehensive planning has been a function of Washington County for more than four decades.
Planning related activities began when Washington County adopted their first comprehensive plan in
1969. The present Comprehensive Plan was updated in 1999. The subdivision ordinance was
originally adopted in 1975 with a comprehensive update adopted in June, 2003. The Zoning
Ordinance was adopted in 1980, and a comprehensive update was adopted in May, 2009.
Today, zoning and subdivision review remain important functions of the Planning Commission,
Zoning Board of Appeals, the Zoning Administrator and the County Engineer. The Zoning
Administrator provides the staff functions for the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Planning
Commission, and the County Board. The Administrator provides assistance and information on
planning, zoning, and resource management to individuals and, on occasion, the smaller
communities that are without a planning and zoning function of their own.
The Washington County Planning Commission was created and appointed by the County Board in
1973 as a response to changing conditions and new information provided by the 1970 U.S. Census of
Population, and the Commissions first responsibility was to assist with the development and
adoption of a new Comprehensive Plan. The 1973 Land Use and Transportation Plan addressed
housing, commercial and industrial development, transportations, park and recreation, County
Services, natural resources and citizen participation. The 1973 Plan discouraged scattered residential
development, promoted the orderly extension of public utilities, preserving areas of natural beauty,
and balancing urban development while preserving the Countys rich agricultural lands. The Plan,
being very general in nature, failed to provide for the essential tools necessary to address the
important issues that were identified, namely farmland protection and development in rural
unincorporated areas.
On September 23, 1985, the Illinois legislature enacted the Local Land Resource Management
Planning Act (Illinois State Statutes, Chapter 50 ILCS 805). This important legislative initiative
added strengthened the power of counties and municipalities to engage in intergovernmental
planning activities. The new enabling legislation could be used to develop joint land resource
management plans that address critical land and water resource issues. The Land Resource
Management Planning Act provides that:
It is the purpose of the Act to encourage municipalities and counties
to protect the land, air, water, natural resources and environment of
the State and to encourage the use of such resources in a manner
which is socially and economically desirable through the adoption of
joint or compatible Local Land Resource Management Plans.
As Washington County entered the 1990s, growth pressures increased and agricultural preservation,
open space, growth management, environmental protection, and intergovernmental cooperation
emerged as critical issues. The Comprehensive Plan developed in 1990s attempted to address these
critical issues over a planning horizon of twenty years. The subdivision Ordinance update of 2003
and comprehensive revision of the Zoning Ordinance of 2009 were aimed at implementation of the
strategies of the 1999 Plan.
2016 Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update Process

The Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update is the product of a public input and review
process that specifically sought input from individual citizens and the various municipalities, taxing
bodies, and other organizations within the County. The review process included a public opinion
survey, a survey of persons from the 18-32 age group (Millennials), public forums at various
locations throughout the county to provide individuals an opportunity to review the draft plan and
provide input, a public hearing before the Washington County Planning Commission to receive input
and comment prior to a decision on a recommendation to the County Board. The Plan incorporates
revisions made as a result of public review process. This process has resulted in a plan that seeks to
assure that Washington Countys superior quality of life will be sustained by providing a proper
balance between natural resource protection and community & economic development. The intent
of the plan is to provide elected officials advice and direction to guide decision-making on
Washington Countys development through the twenty-first century.
Figure 1
WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS
Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update Committee Appointed
Inventory and Analysis
Public, Municipal and Other Input
Land Use and Plan Data Compiled and Put in Draft Form
Draft Report Formatted
Review and Hearings Scheduled
Washington County Planning Commission Review
Public Hearing and Forums
30-Day Public Comment Period
Revised Draft Comprehensive Plan Update Completed
Comprehensive Plan Update Committee Review and forward to Planning

Commission
Review by County Planning Commission and Decides on

Recommendation to County Board
Planning Commission Submits Comprehensive Plan to Washington

County Board
Plan Adopted by Washington County
Figure_2___
Washington County Comprehensive
Plan Inputs
The Work of the Comprehensive Plan Update Committee

The planning committee was recommended by the Planning Commission and appointed by the
County Board to initiate and steer the process, and make decisions and recommendations on the
public policy issues that will shape and direct the growth and development of the County over a
twenty year planning horizon. Members of the committee included County Board members,
appointed County administrative staff members, representatives of various local governments within
the County, members of the County business and industrial community, educators, and members of
the agricultural community. The members of the committee met many times over a span of several
months and worked to define the scope of the planning process, gather the many plan inputs,
evaluate the data compiled, and develop the recommendations for the general plan. They undertook
the study of data compiled by the facilitator concerning demographic, economic, social, and political
information in order to be well informed of the baseline factors.
Public Involvement in the Process

In order to shape the scope and context of the planning areas to be addressed the Committee solicited
public input by means of a county-wide public survey via a written questionnaire. The survey
process was accomplished via the internet by using the online survey tool, Survey Monkey, and
was opened to anyone within the County that wished to participate.
Committee undertook a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) Analysis
concerning the many planning issues under consideration, and used this analysis to shape the plan
recommendations. The synopsis of the SWOT Analysis completed is included in the Appendix.
The Committee undertook the development of a vision statement for the County and decided upon
the following vision:
Washington County enjoys a diverse, stable economy while embracing and
preserving our rich agricultural heritage. Agriculture is our primary industry, but
we accommodate growth by conscientiously managing the way new development
should occur while preserving our rich farmland, natural resources and
woodlands; carefully exploiting our important energy reserves; and maintaining a
diverse approach to create a range of employment opportunities and available
housing. We value our youth, honor our seniors, and support our families, with a
desire for all to thrive in a safe, pristine environment as one of the premier rural
counties in Illinois.
The Public Opinion Survey
Notice of the Survey availability was accomplished by local new articles and by way of an insert
included with the County Real Estate Tax Bills that were mailed out by the Treasurers office. Hard
copies of the survey were available to be picked up at the Zoning Office and at the County Clerks
office. The survey remained opened and available for many months in an effort to obtain the best
possible response rate.
While the response rate to the survey was somewhat less than statistically significant, the Committee
ultimately concluded that since responses were received from every township within the county, and
consistently mirrored the general population patterns and demographics within the county, the
survey results could be relied upon as a representative sample. As such, the input received from the
public survey was deemed to be an important guide in continuing the Committees work. A copy of
the survey questions and the full survey results are included in the Appendix.
S.W.O.T. Analysis
The committee undertook an exercise to determine the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and
Threats (S.W.O.T) that exist, or that lie ahead for the county. The results of that exercise are
included in the Appendix.
The most important issues to emerge from the S.W.O.T. analysis were determined to be:
There is some concern that population growth is static in the County in that the countys
population is aging on average, and that younger adult population is leaving the County at an
alarming rate. This type of trend generally means that both the median income and the
average educational level for the County will decline.
The job market in the County is not sufficient to meet the needs of the Countys population
and is contributing to an out-migration of young adults.
Economic Development efforts in the County appear to be insufficient to appreciably affect
the job market and aid the effort to keep property taxes from increasing.
Economic Development via the marketing of the County and improving the Countys
presence on the internet.
Housing stock in the County is aging and new residential development is not sufficient to
attract younger home buyers.
Preservation of Agricultural land is an important objective for the County but new residential
land uses in the vicinity of the incorporated municipalities needs to be encouraged.
Land Use Strategy

The 2014-2016 Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update Committee endorses the
conceptual land use strategies of the 1999 Comprehensive Plan, and asserts that these strategies must
remain as necessary strategies of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update. These strategies are as
follows:
1.
For the purpose of comprehensive planning, Washington County is comprised of three

distinct land use strategy areas: Growth Areas, Rural Corridors, Agricultural/Village Areas.
2. Different intensities and types of development are appropriate for each area.
3. Farmland and open space preservation, as well as, water resource management are critical
elements of land use planning in the County.
4. Balanced development should be encouraged.
5. Agriculture must continue to be a desired land use.
6. A strong relationship must exist between land use and transportation planning.
In addition, three new strategies have been identified by the Committee and have been added to the
list:
7. Modest population growth must be encouraged with emphasis on efforts to retain our young
adult population within the County.
8. Economic Development in growth areas must be a priority for the County.
9. Extraction industries are an important element of the Countys history, as well as its future.
The strategies also include completing a draft copy of the Plan and establishing a process for public
review of the draft plan. The process of preparing the draft plan began with an analysis of the
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) of the County, development of a vision
and vision statement, identification and examination of five distinct planning elements facing the
County, and development of goals and objectives for each planning element identified. Goals and
objectives will determine the direction for the County over a planning horizon of the next twenty
years. The planning process as depicted in Figure 1 was utilized.
2036 Perspective
Suburban development continues within the rural corridors, although the rate at which it is
happening appears to have be slowed by development regulation in the County. Development
Pressures have been experienced as a result of the construction period for the Prairie State Energy
Campus construction, but much of this pressure has eased now that construction is complete and the
mine and power plant are both in full operation. This major industrial facility was not even foreseen
at the adoption of the last Comprehensive Plan. The growth pressure anticipated from the Scott
AFB/MidAmerica Airport joint use anticipated at the last Comprehensive Plan has not yet
materialized to any great extent, but should continue to be considered as a potential issue for the
future. Rural citizens are concerned about the future of agriculture, environmental degradation, and
the impact of scattered residential rural development. With the passage of the Illinois Hydraulic
Fracturing Regulatory Act (765 ILCS 525) in June, 2013, considerable interest was shown in some
areas of Washington County by high volume hydraulic fracturing companies (fracking). The interest
and rate of growth in this area has slowed to a trickle since domestic oil and gas prices plummeted
earlier in 2015, but this technology must be considered as a potential development pressure in the
future.
In this plan we anticipate a twenty year planning horizon. In the twenty-first century Washington
County will experience increased development pressures and pressure for conversion of open space
and rich farm land, and concerns and conflicts will arise. Timely planning efforts aim to anticipate
these concerns and conflicts, and seeks to resolve and mitigate many problems as they become
evident. The thrust of this plan is to strengthen Washington Countys historical land use pattern.
Building upon the historical framework, the Plan identifies anticipated growth areas, rural corridors,
and agricultural areas.
Expanding municipal boundaries, transportation improvements, and anticipating growth is expect to
renew pressure on open space and natural resources. The preferred approach of managed growth can
prevail over conventional suburban sprawl, and scattered residential development in the agricultural
areas, at various locations throughout the county if the current policy of balanced growth is
maintained. Rural and urban sprawl frequently become the norm in metropolitan areas and is
usually the result of competitive, uncooperative, and unplanned development. The success of this
Plan and balance, managed growth depends on the support and cooperation of the cities and villages
within the County because this is where expanding municipal boundaries, expensive public
improvements, and critical land use decision will be made.
Values, Goals, Objectives and Policies
The development of goals begins with values, which are translated into objectives, and from which
policies aimed at achieving the established goals are generated. The range of policies that can and
should be adopted is limited by the values themselves. This factor suggests which policies can work,
and which cannot. In many cases, while a certain policy would work, the more forceful desires of
society will not permit it to work. In essence, then, these values , goals, objectives and policies
constitute a body of development factors; they define the future development of a planning area.
A distinction needs to be drawn among these development factors:
Values: These are widely shared concepts of what is good. Value-oriented planning is concerned
with achieving that which is in conformance with a standard of excellence.
Goals: These are an expression of values; they are abstractions that provide direction towards an
ideal condition to be sought. Goals are not measurable end-products, but reflect the desires of a
community to maintain and improve the quality of life.
Objectives: These are the means of achieving stated goals. They are specific statements of purpose
that serve as a guide for public policy and action.
Policies: Policies translate objective into useful and understandable decision guidelines. Policies
are to be fully considered and evaluated when allocating resources, making public improvement,
directing growth, and receiving development proposals.
The attainment of the goals of the Washington County Comprehensive Plan is a long-term process.
As Washington County grows and develops the values, goals, objectives, and policies of its citizens
10
and elected official will evolve. The Plan should be reviewed regularly to determine if revision of
the plan is appropriate.
Although they are general in nature these goals identified by the Washington County Comprehensive
Plan Update Committee can be achieved through the more specific objectives recommended by the
Committee in order for the County Board to develop the public policies to implement them.
County-Wide Planning Goals

Washington County will work closely with the various local jurisdictions within the County to achieve a
shared community vision for the region.
Quality of Life
Preservation of the rural and small town atmosphere of the County, characterized by an attractive and
healthy environment while being open to opportunities to expand the Countys economy and tax base.
Agricultural Preservation
Support the conservation, protection, development and improvement of prime agricultural land for the
production of foods, fiber, and other agricultural products.
Development Patterns
To encourage development which can be adequately served by transportation facilities, community
facilities, public utilities and other urban services and amenities.
Employment
Promote the spirit of growth and the development of the local employment base to diversify the areas
economy to provide for personal income growth by using all economic development tools available.
Housing
Support and promote the availability of a variety of housing types within Washington County that are
based on needs of residents.
Transportation
Continue to provide safe, efficient transportation systems compatible with adjacent land use.
Natural Resources
All development decisions shall consider the conservation and wise use of our air, soil, water resources
and the natural environment of Washington County.
Historic Preservation
Continue to protect and maintain local historic and cultural resources that contribute to the character of
Washington County.
Citizen Participation
11
Promote and encourage citizen participation in planning the physical development of the County by
assuring that citizen input is invited and welcome in the process.
12
A General Profile
Purpose
The purpose of this section is to provide the background information on the geographic, natural, and
social elements of Washington County. These elements comprise the physical characteristics,
environmental resources, and human activities that have shaped Washington County over the
decades. This section provides a foundation for cooperative planning and effective resource
management.
Geographic Setting
Washington County includes approximately 564 square miles, or 360,980 acres. The County
measures approximately 20 miles north to south and 30 miles east to west with 16 townships and 13
municipalities.
Washington County is located in southwestern Illinois, and is generally a part of the Greater St.
Louis Metropolitan Area while not actually part of the St. Louis MSA. The County is within
commuting distance of the important employment centers of the City of St. Louis and St. Louis
County in Missouri, and the Illinois urban counties of Madison and St. Clair. The adjacent counties
for Washington are St. Clair, Clinton, Marion, Jefferson, Perry, and Randolph.
Lambert-St. Louis International Airport is approximately 70 miles from the County and MidAmerica
Airport is 27 miles, with both airports being located west of the County along interstate highway
systems. The major highways providing access to and from the County are Interstate-64 which
transverses the northern one-third of the County, U.S. Highway 51 which runs north and south near
the eastern edge, and state highways providing access to the municipalities are IL Route 177, IL
Route 160, IL Route 127, and IL Route 15.
The Region
Washington County is located within the region known as Southwestern Illinois, a seven county area
which is the most dense area of population in southern Illinois and is the partly industrialized
Illinois portion of the St. Louis Metropolitan Area. Though not a part of the St. xLouis Metropolitan
Statistical Area, Washington County does derive significant advantages by being located in close
proximity to such a vibrant center of commercial, industrial, entertainment, transportation, and
cultural activity. The region is also home to a major military installation, Scott Air Force Base
where the United States 375th Air Mobility Wing is based.
The County is within commuting distance of the important employment centers of the City of St.
Louis and St. Louis County in Missouri, and the Illinois urban counties of Madison and St. Clair.
The adjacent counties for Washington are St. Clair, Clinton, Marion, Jefferson, Perry, and Randolph.
13
Lambert-St. Louis International Airport is approximately 70 miles from the County and MidAmerica
Airport is 27 miles, with both airports being located west of the County along interstate highway
systems. The major highways providing access to and from the County are Interstate-64 which
transverses the northern one-third of the County, U.S. Highway 51 which runs north and south near
the eastern edge, and state highways providing access to the municipalities are IL Route 177, IL
Route 160, IL Route 127, and IL Route 15.
Figure 3__
Geographic Setting
There are 13 incorporated municipalities across 16 townships in the County. In addition, there are
several platted, but unincorporated, communities in the rural areas. The County seat is at Nashville.
Table _1__ shows the list of townships, their population and a list of the municipalities in each
township.
14
Table 1
Population by Township and Municipality
TOWNSHIP
Ashley
POPULATION
Total
816
MUNICIPALITIES
Unincorporated
280
POPULATION
Incorporated
City of Ashley
536
Beaucoup
593
267
City of Nashville (part)
326 (estimated)
Bolo
Covington
419
418
419
311
*
Village of New Minden (part)
107 (estimated)
Du Bois
748
323
Village of Radom
Village of Du Bois
220
205
Hoyleton
1,142
503
Village of Hoyleton
New Minden (part)
531
108 estimated
Irvington
1,285
507
Village of Irvington
City of Wamac (part)
659
119 (estimated)
Johannisburg
511
511
Lively Grove
688
688
3,676
744
City of Nashville (part)
594
373
Village of Oakdale
Okawville
1,987
427
Village of Okawville
Pilot Knob
555
555
Plum Hill
537
411
Richview
343
90
Venedy
404
266
Nashville
Oakdale
Totals
14,716
2,932 (estimated)
221
1,434
*
Village of Addieville (part)
126 (estimated)
Village of Richview
253
Village of Venedy
138
6,675 (45.4%)
8,041 (54.6%)
Source: U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2010 Census of Population

* Townships so designated do not contain any incorporated areas(part) Municipalities so designated lie within two separate townships and
population is apportioned for purposes of this chart.
DEMOGRAPHICS AND POPULATION TRENDS

In planning, it is necessary to investigate pop ulation growth, changes in household
structure, and other demographic trends that impact market forces in order to help
guide Washington Countys future land use and development.
15
At the 2010 Census the total population was 14,716 which reflected a loss i n
population from the 2000 Census, a loss of 432 persons (2.9%). The County ranked
76 th out of Illinois 102 counties. The Countys population has remained fairly static
over several decades since a 13% increase occurred between 1970 and 1980. Figure 4
compares the population trends over several decades for Washington County with the
regional population trends for the seven counties in Southwestern Illinois.
Figure 4
Population Trends
16
Figure 5
The population pyramid is a tool that is used by demographers to chart the gaining of a population.
Washington Countys population pyramid shows that the bulk of the population is clustered in the
age group of 45 years to 74 years. Alarming is the fact that, aside from the population over 75, the
smallest age group are those persons between the ages of 20 and 39. Persons in this age group are
generally thought of as those of child-bearing age, and it is this segment that must be relied upon for
a stable population and workforce.
17
A Brief History
On January 2, 1818 the Legislative council and the House of Representatives of the Illinois Territory
passed an act that separated the area that is now Washington and Clinton counties from St. Clair
County. The same act that founded the original county of Washington appointed three
Commissioners. They met at the house of James Bankson of Shoal Creek on March 2, 1818 and
pronounced that, The permanent seat of justice of said county be established on the site of the Old
Town of Covington.
The Town of Covington was officially considered for the location of the Capital of the new State of
Illinois in 1818. Mr. Bankston of Washington County, a delegate to the State Constitutional
Convention, introduced a resolution calling for Covington to be designated as the official seat of
government. The town was then the county seat of Washington County. It was described as being
near the center of the Illinois population, located on the beautiful Kaskaskia River, and located so
that all overland roads in the area must inevitably pass through this town. The area around
Covington was described as rich, beautiful and healthy, however, on August 20, 1818 members of
the Constitutional Convention voted to reject Covingtons bid for the seat of state government.
Vandalia was later selected as the capital.
In 1824, Clinton County separated from Washington County and the boundaries of the County have
remained the same since then. The County seat remained at Covington until 1831. For years all that
remained of the old brick court building in Covington was the crumbling ruin. Today all that can be
found is the red cast in the earth from the disintegrating brickbats.
A new site of the County seat was demanded after Clinton County split away. A pole was struck
upon the Southwest Quarter, Section 17 of Nashville Township. The place was called Georgetown.
No buildings were built, and when the court met they found nothing to mark the spot except the
forty-foot pole, and the court adjourned to Covington. There was considerable debate among the
East (Beaucoup) and West (Elkhorn) settlements. The people who favored the Nashville site were
too poor to raise the money to buy the land from the government. They went to David Pulliam, a
man who could raise a hundred dollars in cash whenever he desired. So persistent was the party who
went to see him that Pulliam got so annoyed that he pulled off his old white hat and threw it to the
ground saying, I would not give that old hat for all that town will ever make. Two men, Robert
Middleton and William G. Brown of St. Clair County, were finally induced to purchase the land.
In March, 1831 the town was laid out, platted and surveyed. David white, Joseph Wittenberg, and
Livesay Carter, the Commissioners, declared this to be the permanent seat of justice of Washington
County. All of these men being natives of Tennessee, and having fond memories of that area, named
the town New Nashville. The New was later dropped from the name.
On June 25, 1831 the County Commissioners contracted with Thomas L. Moore for the building of a
courthouse on the public square in Nashville. He erected a frame courthouse that continued in use
18
until 1840. On April 1, 1840 a new courthouse was contracted with the agreed upon price of $4,385.
It was built on the site of the old one. The Courtroom was on the ground floor and the offices on the
second flood. Later this arrangement was reversed. This building was destroyed by fire in 1883.
At a special meeting of the Board of Supervisors in October, 1883 a contract was let to A.
Hallenbeck for $23,999 for building yet another courthouse that was completed in 1884 and is the
present day courthouse for Washington County.
Topography, Drainage and Soils

The County consists of small towns, forests, barrens, wetlands, pasture, and cropland. A 248-acre
lake, the Washington County Lake within the IDNR State Conservation area, is located within the
County. Most of the land in Washington County is flat to gently rolling terrain, and does not include
excessively steep slopes generally. The majority of areas which do have steep slopes of greater than
12 percent are located in the southeast quadrant of the County, with another area southeast of
Venedy.
The County is situated within the Illinois major land resource areas of (113) Central Clay Pan Area,
and (114B) Southern Illinois and Indiana Thin Loess and Till Plain, Western Part. From the NRCS
County Soil Survey: The elevation in Washington County ranges from about 385 to 583 feet. The
County is a loess-covered till plain dissected by shallow, low-gradient rivers and streams. Much of
the area was forested, but many prairies occur throughout the area. Washington County was
glaciated by the Illinoisan glacier approximately 150,000 years ago. The County consists of upland
loess-covered claypan soils and Wisconsinan-age lacustrine terrace soils along the Kaskaskia River.
Drainage in Washington County flows into the Mississippi River through the Big Muddy and
Kaskaskia Rivers. Major streams are the Mud, Elkhorn, Plum, and Crooked Creeks which flow into
the Kaskaskia River, and the Little Muddy River and Beaucoup Creek flow into the Big Muddy
River.
19
Figure 6
Climate
Washington County has the continental climate typical of southern Illinois; cold and rather dry in the
winter and very hot and humid in the summer. Due to the latitude, area weather fronts associated
with low pressure systems bring frequent changes in temperature, humidity, cloudiness and wind
direction during the majority of the year. These changes are considerably less frequent during the
summer months. Distinct winter, summer, fall, and spring seasons occur. Minimum temperatures
reach 0F or below during a bout 60 percent of the winters, and maximum temperatures reach 100F
20
or higher during about 75 percent of the summers. The average winter temperature is about 33F,
and the average summer temperature is about 76F.
In summer, precipitation occurs mostly as showers and thunderstorms of brief duration, although a
single thunderstorm often produces more than one inch of rain and occasionally is accompanied by
hail and damaging winds. Annual precipitation ranges from 30 40. Twenty-three inches, more
than half of the annual total, falls during the growing season of April through September, and rarely
will total precipitation fall below 16 inches during this period. Monthly precipitation averages more
than 3.4 inches in March through August.
January is normally the coldest month, and July the warmest. Maximum temperatures in July and
August average close to 90F. The prevailing winds are southerly to southwesterly except during
the three winter months when northwesterly winds dominate. Wind speeds generally average
between 10 and 15 miles per hour, but in severe thunderstorms and during tornado conditions, wind
velocities reach 50 to 75 miles per hour.
Hydrology
Hydrology is the science that deals with the waters of the earth. Hydrology in Washington County
includes the rainfall, runoff, storage, and movement of water through its landscape and ground. Of
special concern to land use planning are drainage basins, flood plains, and wetlands.
Drainage Basins
The County is divided into two major drainage basins. A drainage basin is the total land surface area
occupied by a network of rivers, streams, and their adjacent slopes. Seventy-five percent of the
County drains into the Kaskaskia River drainage basin. The remainder of the County, primarily the
southeastern portion, drains into the Big Muddy River drainage basin. Water in this area is drained
toward the Big Muddy by Swanick Creek, Locust Creek, Beaucoup Creek, and the Little Muddy
River. The remainder of the County is drained to the Kaskaskia River basin. The major streams of
the Kaskaskia system include Webster Creek, Grand Point Creek, Crooked and Little Crooked
Creeks, Coon Creek, Pond Creek, Plum Creek, Beaver Creek, Elkhorn Creek, and the Mud and
Little Mud Creeks. Waters of both of the Countys drainage basins ultimately reach the Mississippi
River.
Flood Plains
A flood plain is an area of low-lying, flat ground on either side of a river, stream, pond, or lake
subject to periodic inundation by flooding. Flood plains are the natural storage areas for water
overflow after heavy rains or snow melt. Hence, loss of storage in the flood plains increases the
21
likelihood of flooding and increased damage both upstream and downstream. Flood plains in
Washington County are primarily within agricultural areas and do not affect develop areas for the
most part.
Wetlands
Wetlands are a sensitive environmental resource, integral to the hydrologic cycle. Wetlands are
ecosystems periodic inundated by water. The October, 2014 National Wetlands Inventory from the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reveals that there are 19,025 acres under wetlands, ranking
Washington County twentieth in the state. Predominate wetland types found in Washington County
are riverine and palustrine wetlands.
Aquifers
Ground water aquifers are zones below the earths surface that contain water in the voids present in
soil and rock. Most ground water aquifers are recharged from the surface waters that percolate down
from the earths surface, or from streams, rivers, wetlands, lakes, and ponds. Washington County
has three types of aquifer zones:
1. Shallow sand and gravel aquifer zone likely to yield 20 gallons per minute or more.
2. A shallow sand and gravel aquifer zone likely to deliver 100 gallons per minute
3. Bedrock aquifer zone covering the overwhelming vast majority of the County and
yielding non-potable water because of dissolved salts and minerals. In these areas
potable water is derived from other sources; either municipal water systems or
Washington County Rural Water Company.
DISTINCTIVE FEATURES
Land Cover
Washington County ranks twentieth in the State in wetland acreage having 23,321 acres identified,
and accounts for a ranking of twenty-first in the State in portion of the County covered by wetlands
having 19,025 acres, or 5.3% coverage of the total. Washington County also ranks seventy-fourth
in the State in acreage covered by open water having 2,441 acres, with .7% of the area in lakes or
rivers.
22
Table __2__
WASHINGTON COUNTY GENERAL LAND USE

Land Cover
Cropland
Grassland
Forest/Woodland
Wetlands
Urban/Built up land
Transportation
Open Water
Barren/Exposed land
Total
Acres
% of County
226,074
81,120
27,637
19,025
1,908
2,773
2,441
3
360,981
62.6%
22.5%
7.7%
5.3%
.3%
.8%
.7%
<0.1%
100%
Rank within
State
41 of 102
33 of 102
67 of 102
20 of 102
67 of 102
44 0f 102
74 of 102
74 of 102
Source: Illinois Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.state.il.us/orep/ctap/atlas/washngtn.pdf
Figure _7___
WASHINGTON COUNTY LAND COVER FROM USGS
Source: http://gis1.usgs.gov/csas/gap/viewer/land_cover/Map.aspx
23
AGRICULTURAL LAND USES

Agriculture historically has been the dominate land use in the County, and the most recent surveys
indicate more than 93% of the land is occupied with cropland, grasslands and pasture, forest and
woodlands. As a predominately family-owned industry, agriculture plays a vital role in the Countys
economy. A major threat to agriculture is the encroachment of development and the conflicts that
arise between farm and non-farm land uses.
Agriculture In the State of Illinois
Illinois is a major producer of agricultural products in the United States according to the U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2012 Census of Agriculture which reports Illinois
produced 1.253 billion bushels of corn, 40.5 million bushels of wheat, and 371.3 million bushels of
soybeans. For the same year cash receipts from farm marketing in Illinois totaled $17.2 billion,
ranking sixth among all states in the U.S. Illinois exported $7.9 billion of corn, soybeans, wheat,
livestock and meats, ranking 3rd among all states in the export of agricultural commodities. Much of
this production is exported to feed populations in other parts of the world.
Illinois is among the leaders of all states in the U.S. in the production of food and fiber. In 2014,
Illinois was second in cash receipts earned from all crops, and ranked 22nd in cash earned from
livestock. That same year Illinois ranked second in production of corn, second in soybeans
production, and fourth in the number of hogs and pigs marketed. In 2014 Illinois had 74,500 farms.
Role Of Agriculture In Washington County
Farming is, first and foremost, a business. According to the Illinois Department of Agricultures
most recently available agricultural statistics the cash receipts of Washington County agricultural
products totaled nearly $144,788,000 for the 2012 Census of Agriculture, up 29% over the previous
year. County farmers harvested 3,191,913 bushels of soybeans, 4,188,473 bushels wheat, and
2,914,588 bushels of corn. Farms in Washington County account for 354,899 acres of land, and
Cropland accounts for roughly 64 percent of the agricultural total. Washington County was ranked
1st in production in wheat and 12th in production in soybeans in the State of Illinois at the 2012
Census of Agriculture.
Agriculture is an integral part of Washington Countys economy, landscape, and natural resource
base. Agriculture will continue to contribute to a stable and diversified economy, especially as the
variety of agricultural crops and products has increased in response to changing markets.
Agribusiness services and facilities support the farm economy and need a strong agricultural base for
their success. The farm economy indirectly creates jobs in equipment sales and service, seed
research and sales, fertilizer and herbicide sales, finance and insurance, food processing industries,
and shipping. Washington County has some of the most productive farmland in the region.
However, the trend for farm specialization and big equipment has changed the face of agriculture in
24
the area. Larger and fewer farms are found in the County today, as is the trend in our nation as a
whole. See Table 4, Washington County Farm Historical View.
Table 3
Table 4
YEAR
WASHINGTON COUNTY FARMS

1959 2012 HISTORICAL VIEW
NUMBER OF FARMS
AVERAGE SIZE
(Acres)
LAND IN FARMS
(Acres)
1959
1,654
191
316,417
1964
1,384
230
318,625
1969
1,388
220
305,712
1974
1,301
224
291,706
1978
1,204
233
280,130
1982
1,173
239
279,879
1987
1,019
269
273,774
1992
945
286
270,598
1997
843
311
262,464
2002
823
309
253,863
2012
777
457
354,899
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Census of Agriculture, 1959 through 2012.
25
Preservation of Agricultural Lands and Activities

With agriculture and agricultural activities being the major economic activity of Washington
County, the County has strong incentive to preserve the integrity and viability of that industry. The
Illinois State Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law amendments to the Livestock
Management Facilities Act, effective in January 2001. These recent amendments have the potential
to significantly impact agricultural activities.
In order to minimize the impacts on agriculture by the Livestock Management Facilities Act it will
be necessary for Washington County to be pro-active in its management of physical development,
especially development in unincorporated portions of the County.
A major threat to animal husbandry and agriculture is encroachment of development and conflicts
between farm and non-farm land uses. Encroaching development discourages new investments in
farm improvements. New non-farm neighbors must contend with odors, dust, noise, and other
conditions present in agricultural areas. To minimize concerns regarding urban encroachment land
use planning must address agricultural land preservation in each of the general planning areas which
are delineated by this plan The Comprehensive Plan strongly encourages farmland preservation by
guiding residential development within planned growth areas around and adjacent to the existing
communities. Areas determined most appropriate to remain in agriculture use have been left outside
the Planned Growth Areas.
Agricultural protection is valuable because:
1. It contributes to a stable economy, both locally and nationally, and provides jobs.
2. It preserves a valued livelihood and way of life.
3. It provides visible, private open space with its rural aesthetics and environmental benefits,
including enhanced air and water quality.
4. It controls storm water runoff and sediment damage, protects groundwater recharge areas, and
conserves soil when appropriate farming practices are used.
5. Farm products contribute the lions share to maintaining the operations of the Kaskaskia
Regional Port District and other assets of the Inland Waterway System.
OTHER EXTRACTION LAND USES

While agriculture is the major extractive land use in the County, there is a long history of coal
mining and oil and gas production. Activity in these two extraction industry is currently quite robust
with the activity at the Prairie State Energy Campus, a mine-mouth coal power generating facility.
Oil and gas continues very active in the county and contributes significantly to the local economy
with the possibility of high pressure hydraulic fracturing on the horizon. The plates on the following
two pages depict the mines and mineral well activity.
26
Figure 8
27
Figure 9
28
OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION

The lands that make up Washington County's open space areas are diverse despite the influence of
agriculture. They consist of undeveloped public and private lands, ranging from large forest tracts to
small parks and playgrounds. Specifically, the County open space inventory includes municipal and
other park districts, school and neighborhood playgrounds, greenways, golf courses,
bicycle/pedestrian trails, cemeteries, recreational areas, state parks, undeveloped urban infill areas,
waterways, wetlands and agricultural areas. Examples include the Washington County State
Conservation Area, the Storck Woods County Nature Preserve, wetlands along the Kaskaskia River,
and various lakes and streams and throughout County.
The wetlands in the County are an important element of the open space system. Often wetlands have
been looked upon as unsightly and having no value unless drained. In more recent years, it has been
recognized that wetlands provide important wildlife habitat, water recharge and pollution cleansing
functions. These functions will become increasingly important as populations increase and
development occurs. Therefore, it is recommended that , by and large, the County's wetlands that
remain be protected.
The Plan recognizes there are limitations to the ability of public agencies to acquire all of the areas
that might be suitable for open space uses. It is recommended that those lands be preserved through
agricultural conservation tools, as homeowner association lands, as conservation easements, or as
private open space. The areas indicated as important open space linkages often have development
limitations, such as flooding, undermined areas, or areas where soils are considered poor for
development purposes, so these lands can often be preserved if development occurs. For those
portions of the County which will remain predominantly in agricultural use to the year 2036, the
recommended open space may not be implemented until development becomes more appropriate.
The 2036 Future Land Use Map indicates areas for potential future open space in the form of large
tracts, linear greenways, and recreational areas. While the areas indicated are an increase in the
County's existing open space it is not intended to limit the locations or amount of open space that
could be achieved by the year 2036.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
In terms of impact, residential is the second largest land use in Washington County following
agriculture. The predominant housing type in the unincorporated areas is single-family detached
housing. Recent trends indicate that both the number and size of the homes are increasing. This
trend is consistent with a national trend to smaller household size. The result is that more land is
being used to accommodate fewer people in this lower density residential land use. The increase in
the number of smaller households which began in the 1970s can be attributed to many factors
including smaller families, couples without children, single parent households, empty-nesters and
29
persons living alone. The general aging of the population, which has been borne out by the last three
Census reports, is another significant factor. A growth trend that reflects increased residential land
uses raises concern about the spread of scattered residential subdivisions, the adequacy of
infrastructure, and the future of agriculture.
Low Density Residential
These areas are often adjacent to existing low density residential areas or may already have a limited
degree of scattered development in the rural areas. These land uses generally contain one dwelling
or less per acre. The plan recommends that the character, agricultural potential, wildlife base, and
natural features of these areas be preserved by maintaining current low density criteria for future
developments. Table __ depicts the nature of the housing stock within the County.
The density of development should be determined by the area's physical characteristics and, where
applicable, the suitability of the soils to accommodate individual wastewater disposal systems.
Rural residential areas adjacent to small communities are included in this category to encourage an
infill strategy between and adjacent to existing rural residential development, generally where prime
agricultural lands will not be taken out of production.
Densities of new proposed subdivisions in the areas planned for rural residential development should
be based on prevailing standards and regulations, surrounding densities, soil suitability for septic
systems, preservation of natural features, and the character of the area. Open space design
requirements are recommended for these areas.
Table 5
Washington COUNTY HOUSING STOCK
Source U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, Revised 6/12/2015
Total housing Units
5,788
Owner Occupied
4,627
Renter Occupied
1,161
Detached
4,919
Attached
21
Mobile home
572
Multi-Family
276
30
Figure 10
Source: US Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Census 2010, Summary File 1,
Persons per square mile:2010.
Urban Residential
The Urban Residential category refers to densities of development equal to or greater than two
dwelling units per acre that specifically should receive the provision of municipal-type facilities and
services. Urban residential designations on the 2036 Plan Map in large part reflect the proposed or
adopted land use plans of municipalities or the character of residential areas adjacent to
municipalities. This category also includes areas adjacent to existing development or settlements
that have public water and sewer systems. Specific areas for multiple family (commonly called high
density residential) are not excluded from this category, but are not shown separately. The majority
of multiple family developments should only occur where public infrastructure is accessible and that
occurs primarily in municipalities. Multi-family developments not within municipalities or
designated within the planning jurisdiction of municipalities should be discouraged. Once
annexation and extension of utilities have occurred, the municipalities can provide diverse housing
opportunities in well-designed neighborhoods.
31
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

These important general land use categories relate directly to the Countys employment base, tax
base and economic development base. Many areas designated for commercial development are
based on municipal plans. The County recognizes the importance of balancing future residential and
population growth with the generation of additional employment opportunities.
Most of the areas recommended for commercial or industrial land uses are along major state or
County highways and are close to concentrations of population. Control of access points and
requirement of aesthetic design criteria will be critical concerns in order to prevent inefficient traffic
patterns and unsightly strip commercial development. The County's management of these land uses
will need to be carefully coordinated with the municipalities. It is anticipated that much of this kind
of development will occur only as the properties are annexed and provided with municipal services.
Industry and Labor Climate of Washington County
The population and labor force of Washington County have remained relatively constant over the
last two decades. As with the national trend from the recession that began in 2009, Washington
County did experience a significant increase in unemployment during the period 2009-2012. As of
2015 unemployment in the county has stabilized, dropping to below four per cent. Despite the
recession years, Washington County has seen a sizable increase both in number of persons employed
as well as in overall labor force participation. This is in stark contrast to both the state and national
labor force trends.
Table 6
WASHINGTON COUNTY
LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION
1995-2015 Annualized Rates
YEAR
2015
2010
2000
1995
LABOR
FORCE
9,320
8,498
8,432
8,010
NUMBER
EMPLOYED
8,957
7,882
8,120
7,697
NUMBER
UNEMPLOYED
363
616
312
313
UNEMPLOYMENT
RATE
3.9
7.2
3.7
3.9
Source: http://www.ides.illinois.gov/LMI/Pages/Historical_Monthly_Annual_Data
32
Figure 11
WASHINGTON COUNTY LABOR STATISTIC TRENDs 1990-2015
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 12/30/2015

33
Industrial and commercial activity and labor information within Washington County is represented
by the statistics shown from the US Census Bureaus 2012 Economic Census and the Illinois County
Statistical Abstract portrayed in Table 6 that follows:
Table 7
2014 ECONOMIC CENSUS, AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY:
INDUSTRIAL STATISTICS BY NAICS
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Industry
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Real Estate, Rental, and
Leasing
Professional, Scientific
& Technical Services
Administrative Services
Health Care & Social
Assistance
Arts, Entertainment and
Recreation
Accommodations &
Food Services
Information
Other Services
Utilities
Finance & Insurance
*Construction
*Mining/Extraction
Transportation &
Warehousing
Industries not classified
Total for All Sectors
# of
Establishments
2014
13 (15 in 2002)
32 (34 in 2002
59 (79 in 2002
# of
Establishments
2002
15
34
79
-2
-2
-20
# of Paid
Employees
2014
Not specified
763
768
14 (7 in 2002)
+7
14
22 (23 in 2002)
23
-1
92
16 (17 in 2002)
17
-1
Not specified
25 (28 in 2002)
28
-3
Not specified
5 (4 in 2002)
-1
27
30 (37 in 2002)
37
-7
336
6 (9 in 2002)
55 (51 in 2002)
1 (3 in 2002
32 (33 in 2002)
37 (37 in 2002)
4 (4 in 2002)
9
51
3
33
37
4
-3
+4
-2
-1
0
0
23
213
Not specified
166
Not specified
Not specified
22 (30 in 2002)
30
-8
373
4
383
4
419
0
-36
Not specified
4,811
Gain or Loss
2002-2014
Source: U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2014 County Business Patterns
The Countys economic climate is relatively healthy and robust as we enter 2016, and should prove
inviting for potential new development. Because we are planning for the future of the County, it is
helpful to have some idea concerning the business sectors that can expect growth in the future. The
Illinois Department of Employment Security has forecasted the leading growth industries for
Southwestern Illinois.
The top ten growth industries identified in the forecast and predicted
employment levels for Southwestern Illinois are as depicted in Table 8:
34
Table 8
SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS
PROJECTED GROWTH INDUSTRIES
Industry
Educational Services
Food & Drinking Establishments
Ambulatory Health Care
Nursing/Residential Care Facilities
Administrative and Support Services
Professional, Scientific & Technical
Warehousing and Storage
General Merchandise Stores
Social Assistance
Hospitals
Projected Employment
27,452
21,585
10,901
8,936
8,055
9,661
1,964
9,126
5,680
12,587
Source: Illinois Department of Employment Security
RETAIL TRADE
Washington County enjoys a fairly robust economy given its population size, but it lacks the
presence of any big box retailers and major grocers. Where this becomes glaringly obvious is
when you look at a comparison between Washington County and some of its neighboring counties.
The table on the following page reflects the amount of sales tax dollars distributed to County
Governments during 2014. Washington County lags well beyond neighboring counties in sales tax
revenues indicating that considerable economic leakage may be occurring through county
residents patronizing commercial establishments in these neighboring counties.
35
Table 9
36
In comprehensive planning, our attention in utilizing this information is focused upon the land uses
necessary to accommodate the needs of existing and growth industries, and in the avoidance of
adjacent incompatible land uses.
Highway Commercial
This is a limited land use category specifically used to identify commercial activities that serve the
markets provided by transportation corridors, not just the surrounding population. In most instances
there is a mix of markets but the primary markets are those of transportation and agriculture and is
primarily based upon ease of access .
General Commercial Development
This land use category is used to denote a variety of commercial development possibilities.
Depending on the specific location, they may include urban arteries, individual businesses,
professional office parks, malls, agri-business uses or areas that are primarily commercial but may
contain some warehousing or other uses.
Industrial, Light Industrial, Warehousing (Includes related office facilities and similar large
facilities)
The development of land uses in this category generally should occur on large parcels as industrial
parks or light industrial centers. Some industrial land uses are "heavy" in nature, others secondary
manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, and light industrial uses. Once again, it is recommended
that most of these uses be permitted only when they are in developments that are coordinated with
transportation facilities and where water and sewer systems are available, since these land uses
generally require a high level of utility service and can generate considerable traffic volumes.
Development of these types of land uses will help to ensure a traditional employment base for
Washington County and provide an adequate tax base for the general public. These land uses may
also be developed as businesses utilizing high technology.
PUBLIC AND SEMI-PUBLIC LAND USES

This land use category includes governmental uses and institutional holdings. This category also
represents the incorporated municipalities in Washington County. These communities contain
infrastructure, higher densities, mixed land uses and commercial and employment centers. They
provide a number of services to their residents including fire and police protection and public water
and sewer service.
37
PLANNING ELEMENTS
38
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Chapter is to identify, describe and discuss issues that form the core of the 2036
Comprehensive Plan.
This identification, description and discussion forms the primary
considerations when designating proposed land uses and recommended plan implementation
measures.
OVERVIEW OF PLANNING STRATEGY
Over the past decade, the urban edge of the St. Louis metropolitan area has expanded in an easterly
direction across St. Clair, Madison and Clinton counties. With Washington County being literally at
the edge of this expansion area opportunities for development were anticipated, and raised concerns
about the spread of scattered subdivisions and the future of agriculture in the rural areas. As
Washington County began the 21st Century it was expected to experience increased development
pressure and a trend of conversion of farmland to suburban and urban growth. Over the last fifteen
years development pressures materialized only within the southwest quadrant of the County and was
due primarily to development at the Prairie State Energy Campus. As the new mine and power
generating plant came on line in 2012 a population and residential surge that had been anticipated
did not appreciably occur.
The purpose of the 2036 Plan is to provide a statement about County goals and policies and to retain
Washington Countys historical land use pattern: promote higher density and compact development
in the planned growth areas of the County; preserve rural and agricultural uses outside the growth
areas and within the balance of the County. Building upon this framework, the Comprehensive Plan
identifies three distinctive strategies for the development of Washington County.
Recommended Land Use Strategies
Distinct land use strategy areas exist in the County: Agricultural/rural corridor Kaskaskia
flood plain corridor, Interstate Highway Corridor, and the industrial/extraction Corridor.
Different approaches and development types may be appropriate for each strategy area and
should help to reinforce historical land use patterns.
Balanced development should be encouraged with land use emphasis building upon the
locational characteristics of areas, historic uses and their natural resources.
Agriculture will continue to be a prevalent and desired land use and will be addressed in a
cultural, economic and open space framework.
An interdependent relationship exists between land use and transportation planning that
requires coordinated planning.
Partnership Planning concepts should be explored to facilitate cooperative planning with
municipalities.
39
Encourage Development Within the Planned Growth Areas

The management of development is best done by encouraging that activity to take place in locations
that minimize the negative impacts and maximize the benefits of development. Those locations that
reduce the negative impacts and maximize the benefits of development are in and around existing
municipalities within Washington County. Those are the locations where public water supplies,
public sanitary sewers and stormwater management systems are operating.
The most opportune method of encouraging development to occur in and around existing
municipalities is to continue the concept of growth areas around those municipalities. The
growth areas reduce minimum lot size according to the level of public utilities and stormwater
management provided. As a result of the 2010 Census the more realistic size of growth areas for
Washington County would be one-quarter (1/4) mile surrounding each community within the
County.
Discourage Development in Floodplains
Washington County will be approaching a crossroad in the future due to growth and expanding
municipal boundaries. The choice of balanced and managed growth depends on the cooperation of
the cities and villages within the County, where expanding municipal boundaries, extension of
public utilities and critical land use decisions will be made.
Encourage a modest population growth
The out-migration of the Countys young adult population should be a serious concern because of
the need for a stable population and workforce, and efforts to stem the tide should be undertaken.
The Comprehensive Plan Update Committee undertook an informal study to canvas some of the
young adults in the County, as well as some that had left the County to determine what steps could
be taken to retain more of this population group within the County. The results of that study are
included in the Appendix, and some of those recommendations have been incorporated into some of
the actions steps recommended by this plan.
Improve Countys presence on the World Wide Web by exploiting Internet Technology
The County is not taking advantage of the important tool that is having an internet web presence.
Efforts should be taken to exploit this resource to market the County for Economic Development and
workforce enhancement
Expand Economic Development Efforts of the County
Over and over, those responding to the public opinion survey for this committee indicated that not
enough is being done in the County on Economic Development. Many were in favor of securing the
services of a professional Economic Development specialist, and not just leaving this function up to
the municipalities. Economic Development should be a County-Municipality alliance.
40
LAND USE ELEMENTS

THE LAND USE PLAN
The Washington County Land Use Plan is based on the assumption of modest population growth of
approximately 5% over the planning time frame of 20 years. Washington County is evolving as a
desirable location for residential and light industrial development. There is also growing potential for
commercial and recreational uses in the Washington County Lake area of the County as well as in
the western portion of the County in conjunction with the Prairie State Energy Campus, Scott Air
Force Base, and MidAmerica Airport.
The intent of the Washington County Land Use Plan is to:
Continue to maintain a strong residential base within the County;
Direct major commercial and residential development into areas identified for growth;
Provide for the extension of infrastructure in these designated growth areas, in particular
expansion of the transportation system;
Improve and diversify the economic base of the County to provide additional jobs for its
residents; and
Conserve the rich agricultural heritage of the areas of the County until growth and
development pressures make it necessary to extend utilities and services.
41
GOAL: Agricultural Preservation

Support the conservation, protection, development and improvement of
agricultural lands intended for the production of foods and other agricultural
products.
Objectives
1. To protect farmland, a valuable natural resource and an economically productive land use, from
premature conversion to other land uses.
2. To minimize conflicts and incompatibilities between agriculture and other land uses.
3. To encourage and promote agriculturally related businesses as a valued element of the
Washington County economy.
4. To encourage the effective use of agricultural land in achieving soil conservation goals.
5. To discourage the use of public funds for projects that will have a detrimental impact on the
preservation of any designated agricultural lands.
6. To support incentives and assist property owners in maintaining agricultural lands.
7. Maintain agricultural production on farmland beyond the urban service boundaries to minimize
speculative land transactions and provide incentive for long term agricultural uses.
8. Support the needs and practices of agriculture as the highest priority in areas designated for
agricultural uses.
ISSUE FOCUS
The State of Illinois and Washington County have some of the most productive farmland in the
world. Agriculture has been the dominant land use in the County since the early 19 th century and
still occupies the preponderance of its unincorporated lands. As an industry, agriculture plays a vital
role in the Countys economy. The encroachment of development into agricultural areas, and the
conflicts that arise between farm and non-farm land uses, poses a major threat to agriculture. This
plan strongly discourages premature conversion of farmland through protective land use strategies
and by guiding residential development toward planned growth areas.
42
CONSERVING AGRICULTURAL LAND

Washington County has a variety of reasons for implementing farmland protection programs.
Agricultural land conservation techniques serve many purposes:
Protects the best farmland

Protects the economic base that agriculture brings
Reduces premature disinvestment in agriculture
Discourages premature conversion of farmland
Reduces conflicts between neighbors
Retains natural systems and open space
The American Farmland Trust has produced an overview of the most common farmland protection
techniques in use around the country, and they include the following:
1. Purchase of Agricultural Conservation Easements (PACE) Also know as purchase of
development rights, this is a land conservation techniques that helps communities protect one
of their most threatened natural resourcesprime farmlandfrom conversion to nonagricultural uses. In PACE programs a governmental agency or nonprofit organization
(such as a land trust) buys a conservation easement on qualified farmland. This agreement is
recorded with the deed to limit the future use of the land to agriculture, of course with certain
benefits to the owner. Depending upon the program, it may be permanent or in place for a
designated period of time.
2. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) These are programs intended to maintain
designated areas in agricultural or open space use while, at the same time, compensating the
owners of the protected land for the loss of their right to develop it for non-farm purposes. A
typical TDR system establishes both a protection district and a development district.
Landowners in the protection district are assigned development rights, but are not allowed to
develop their property. Instead, they may sell their development rights to landowners in the
development district who may then use these rights to build at higher densities than allowed
under current zoning guidelines.
3. Agricultural Districts These are legally recognized geographic areas formed voluntarily by
one or more landowners and approved by one or more government agencies. Districting
programs are based on the premise that if farmers are given sufficient incentives to create
districts in which farming is the primary activity allowed, and if they are protected from
many of the factors that make farming undesirable or unprofitable, they will keep their land
in agricultural use.
4. Agricultural Zoning - A particular zoning technique a community selects for protecting
farmland should be based on a variety of factors including land development patterns, parcel
43
sizes and unique local concerns. Following are descriptions of five different agricultural
zoning techniques:
5. Point/Numerical Approach - permits non-farm uses on a case-by-case basis, relying on
specific standards to gauge the impact of the land use on farmland.
6. Conditional or Special Use-permits non-farm uses on a conditional basis relying on
discretionary standards. It is also a special land use permit approach. Non-farm uses may or
may not be permitted by the zoning authority whose decision is usually based on several
criteria.
7. Sliding Scale-The number of buildable lots allowed under the sliding-scale approach is set by
a scale that considers the total size of the parcel owned. Smaller parcels are allowed
proportionally more lot splits to total acreage than are larger parcels.
8. Quarter/Quarter-each landowner is entitled to one lot per 40 acres of farmland. Once the
farmer has converted the lot or lots he or she is entitled to, it becomes a matter of record, and
no further non-farmland development on the parcel is permitted.
9. Exclusive Agricultural Zoning-prohibits all non-farm dwellings in the agricultural zone and
severely restricts other non-farm uses. Some special exception uses related to agriculture
may be permitted, but non-farm dwelling units are not permitted.
Other techniques used to conserve farmland include:
Subdivision Ordinances which govern the design of permitted new development and the
functioning of development, such as traffic circulation. It sets standards for the division of
larger parcels of land into smaller ones, specifying the location of streets, utilities and other
improvements.
Clustering is a design technique that combines zoning and subdivision regulation to permit
clustering of housing units and, unlike traditional zoning, allows for mixture of uses.
Planned Unit Development allows increased residential density clustered on a small part of
the agricultural parcel while retaining the balance of the land for long-term agricultural
production.
Agricultural Buffers are well-defined areas located between non-agricultural development

and agricultural land. The purpose is to shield agricultural operations from the effects of
development and to protect residential areas from the effects of agricultural operations.
Intergovernmental Agreements are voluntary and are negotiated between cities and the
County to protect farmland and establish buffers between cities.
44
Right-to-Farm Ordinances act to preserve existing farms and protect farming operations from
complaints of suburban newcomers. These ordinances make it more difficult for
homeowners to claim their property rights are being infringed on by a nearby farm operation
if the operation was in existence when the homeowners bought their property.
Incentive Programs which provide financial incentives for long-term protection of farmland.
1. Protect land best suited for farming from premature conversion by other land uses, and maintain
agriculture as an integral part of the County's economy, landscape, and natural resource base.
2. Support incentives to retain farmland, and further limit the circumstances under which farmland
operations may be deemed a nuisance.
3. Encourage and support the use of county produced farm products through activities such as
farmers' markets and urban produce markets.
4. Support agribusiness services and facilities, such as equipment sales and service, research
facilities, nurseries and greenhouses, genetic research, grain dryers, grain elevators and fertilizer
services.
5. Encourage, where appropriate, agricultural land use categories in municipal land use plans, and
establish transitional areas between development and agricultural land.
6. Support Executive Order 80-4, Preservation of Illinois Farmland and the Illinois Farmland
Preservation Act.
7. Promote agriculture as a major County industry.
8. Encourage a wide variety of promotional and marketing activities of County grown and processed
materials.
9. Continue the requirement for an advisory report finding by the Zoning Board of Appeals
concerning the suitability of the proposed use based upon a numerical point approach to evaluation
(Land Evaluation Site Assessment, or LESA, system) when such decisions will allow for conversion
of farm land to other land uses.
45
Goal : HOUSING/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

Support and promote the availability of a variety of housing types within
Washington County that are based on needs of residents.
Objectives
1. To encourage a variety of housing types to meet the needs of different age groups, family sizes
and incomes, with careful attention to the housing needs of young adults ages 20 to 30.
2. To live in areas that are safe, free from environmental and public health hazards, and buffered
from incompatible land uses.
3. To ensure orderly County and municipal development with residential land uses and densities
consistent with local and County plans.
4. To provide rural residential housing opportunities for those desiring a rural living environment.
5. To encourage and require the appropriate use of Open Space Design principles and techniques in
County and municipal planning in a manner that complements the rural nature of the County and as
an alternative to conventional suburban sprawl.
6. To maintain existing housing stocks in a safe, attractive manner.
7. To guide new development into compact and compatible growth patterns in which development
can be adequately served by transportation, community facilities, public utilities, and other desirable
services and amenities, consistent with local jurisdictions and the County land use plan.
ISSUE FOCUS
Residential land use is another important land use in Washington County. Urban/built-up areas
comprise only .3% of the total land area in the County, however, increasingly scattered single-family
detached housing is springing up, and much of the land being used for this purpose goes to provide
larger houses for fewer people. Washington Countys intention should be to provide a variety of
housing types to accommodate all types of people, family sizes, and incomes. It is also desirable to
prevent premature conversion of agricultural land and promote a sense of community rather than
contribute to conventional suburban sprawl.
46
RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER
Residential character is the appearance and feel of a residential area. As growth occurs in the
County, new development should be encouraged to fit into the town fabric which helps to reinforce a
local sense of place as people take pride in their home and neighborhood. Good residential character
is neighborhood-oriented and is integrated with the natural environment.
The creation of residential zoning districts consistent with municipal land use plans that place
residential districts next to municipal boundaries where infrastructure is available is most likely to
produce the planned growth the County is seeking. In rural areas, agricultural districts with very
large lot requirements up to 40 acres helps to discourage premature conversion of farm lands to
residential uses.
It is recognized, however, that demands and pressures for large lot residential development in rural
areas will likely occur. Zoning classification for large lot development allows for limited rural
development in locations that are not considered prime for agriculture. These large lot subdivisions
should be developed to a high standard and include adequate public facilities to serve its residents.
Included is a requirement for public water, street design and construction that meets the minimum
standards in the Countys Subdivision Ordinance, and provides adequate sewage disposal.
Subdivisions of six lots or greater should be served by a common sewage collection system with
secondary effluent treatment approved by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
County and municipal development regulations must make development more economically
attractive and rewarding if most new development is to actually locate adjacent to municipalities and
their existing infrastructure. The creation of density and other incentives, such as simplified Planned
Unit Development procedures, in conjunction with open space design or other design features is
recommended.
It is recommended the County initiate a discussion concerning a future land percentage that would
be maintained in agriculture production. This recommendation presupposes that a balanced future
land use pattern is desired and necessary for a high quality of life for County residents.
Finally, it is recommended the County acknowledge the need to resolve the limited housing
opportunities of young adults who often must leave the County following the completion of their
education. The lack of desirable housing for this age group is one major contributor to the
diminishing population of the age group within the County, and ultimately contributes to a static
population, a reduction in the economic base, and reduction of the education level of the County.
47
1. Encourage an open housing market throughout the entire County which provides housing
regardless of age, race, religion, ethnic background, or income level.
2. Discourage residential development in areas where it would be detrimental to County
farmland preservation goals.
3. Promote and encourage rural residential development that is consistent with the ability of the
community to provide services.
4. Promote residential development that attracts a younger population, such as townhouses,
condominiums, and upscale apartments by exploiting the Countys Planned Unit
Development provisions within the Zoning and Subdivision ordinances.
5. Apply best management practices to the development of land with physical limitations for
septic systems and high erosion potential.
6. Require that residential developments preserve and enhance natural features such as
vegetation, wildlife, waterways, wetlands, topography and scenic vistas.
7. Require that new development adjacent to farms provide a suitable buffer through the use of
berms and/or natural landscaping.
8. Consider development regulation revisions that reflect new techniques and innovations to
facilitate housing development, rehabilitation, and construction.
9. Encourage residential development to occur within, or adjacent to, existing municipalities,
rural villages or unincorporated residential areas.
10. Assist the rural villages with property appearance violations such as junk vehicles and
property maintenance issues.
11. Encourage all new housing, including manufactured and modular units, be affixed to a full
permanent perimeter foundation.
12. Discourage residential strip highway development.
13. Pursue development regulation changes in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances that
reflect new techniques and innovations to facilitate housing development, rehabilitation, and
construction and which preserve the qualitative aspects of the Countys natural landscape
conditions including landform, slope, vegetative cover, and natural drainage patterns.
14. Consider the feasibility of implementing an innovative incentive program such as a limited,
temporary real estate tax abatement, in whole or in part, for young families who are first-time
home buyers in the County to offer young families an opportunity raise their families in
Washington County.
48
Goal: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Promote the spirit of growth and the development of the local employment base
to diversify the areas economy to provide for personal income growth by
using all economic development tools available to attract and retain business
and industry.
Objectives
1. To facilitate the retention and expansion of employment opportunities resulting from existing
commercial , office and industrial uses, and by attracting new enterprises.
2. To provide an adequate supply of goods and services throughout Washington County.
3.
To promote new employment opportunities by stimulating growth by attracting new

commercial developments.
4. To encourage the growth of agricultural-related business in farmland areas.

5.
To encourage all developments to be compatible with surrounding land uses.
6. To encourage the redevelopment and improvement of older centers , buildings or industrial

sites.
7. To encourage the coordination of commercial and industrial development activities on a
countywide basis.
8. To encourage workforce development by supporting education and technological innovation
in cooperation with area vocational schools, colleges and universities in job training, and
encourage opportunities for technological development and implementation in Washington
County.
9. To facilitate the retention and expansion of employment opportunities resulting from the
existing industrial base and by attracting new industrial development.
10. To provide for economic diversity within the County.
11. To encourage the coordination of commercial and industrial development activities on a
Countywide basis
ISSUE FOCUS
Commercial and office services land uses provide a major percentage of jobs in Washington County
and are one of the primary sources of local government revenue from sales and property taxes. The
49
variety of commercial land uses includes traditional downtown, heavy commercial, neighborhood
commercial, highway commercial, and agricultural. Services are also within this land use category.
Commercial and service development types can be attractive contributors to an areas well-being, or
they can be sprawling, cluttered development.
Industrial development is an extremely competitive area, and virtually all local governments covet
the jobs inherent with industrial development. Washington County has a relatively short
development history, but the general decline in the manufacturing sector of the national economy
have certainly been felt here. Industrial development in rural areas is extremely important in order
to provide a diversified economic base for the population and revenue stream for local government.
Intergovernmental cooperation enhances industrial development opportunities providing coordinated
efforts to retain and attract additional industry to the County. A rising tide raises all boats.
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS

The majority of commercial area in Washington County occurs within or adjacent to the more urban
municipalities of Nashville, Okawville, and Wamac, and aggregates along transportation corridors.
Commercial development is vital to the County and is to be encouraged but guided by smart
growth public policy decisions in the following areas:
Urbanized Downtowns
Characterized by historical architecture and merchant traditions,
urbanized downtowns are likewise the home of banking, legal, insurance, restaurant and financial
services. Each downtown is unique and should be cultivated, and municipalities should be
encouraged to exploit this uniqueness to optimize their effect on the Washington County economy.
Heavy Commercial This land use includes regional malls, business and office parks, and areas
of intensive commercial activity within or adjacent to municipal areas. This land use provides a
constant revenue stream and draw in the regional population, and are extremely important to the
municipalities in which they are located as well as the County. This represents desirable
development that needs to be encouraged and supported with appropriate incentives and
development regulation.
Urbanized Arteries This land use category differs from Highway Commercial in that, if not
within a municipality, the municipality is nearby. It includes strip developments and relies upon the
traffic count of the artery on which it is located, catering to automobile traffic. This type of
development can represent job and revenue producing ventures, but frequently leads to leap-frog
development and sprawl. Mitigating these undesirable circumstances by County-Municipal
cooperation that encourages alternative sites closer to city centers and available public services is the
ideal.
50
Highway Commercial This land use differs from Urbanized Arteries in that it is often a strip
development in an unincorporated area that may be somewhat distant from a city or town. This use
is dependent on the transportation corridors and interchanges, and not necessarily on an urban area.
This land use is very limited in Washington County primarily because of the expanses of agricultural
areas and occurs primarily along the Interstate highway that traverses the County. In light of
operations at the Prairie State Energy Campus and new interest in coal mining operations within the
region, possibilities to expand this land use category exist for the County. Careful policy decisions
must be made to ensure these uses are spaced reasonably because they may be occurring exclusively
along rural state and county highways that are not limited access roads.
Rural/Agricultural Commercial This land use serves the important task of servicing distribution
and processing for agricultural products and farmlands, and are vital to state, county and local
economies. These uses should be encouraged to locate within rural municipalities to strengthen the
bond between village and farm. Redevelopment of existing facilities should be encouraged.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS
Most industrial land uses have occurred within or near city and villages in the County because this is
where the necessary infrastructure and workforce is located. Acknowledging this, the County and
the municipalities need to work closely together to attract new industrial development, and to
mitigate the potentially adverse impacts of industrial development. Such intergovernmental
cooperation also helps to ensure a good mix of housing and job development with appropriate
buffers in between so that sprawl is minimized and community character is maintained.
The County, because of its proximity to the St. Louis Metropolitan area, must be aware of the
impacts of development on the entire St. Louis region. Although Washington County is not included
in the Metropolitan St. Louis Interstate Air Quality Control Region as designated by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, air quality must be a paramount concern. Of the 12 bi-state
counties included in this region all five Missouri counties, and three Illinois Counties (Madison, St.
Clair and Monroe) have been classified as moderate non-attainment areas for ozone standards. Nonattainment areas are subject to the threat of federally imposed sanctions on development due to air
quality. Washington County is adjacent to St. Clair County, and as such, air quality considerations
should factor into new industrial development decisions made by the County and its municipalities.
In this context, Washington County should to encourage industrial development in the areas where
transportation and municipal services are readily available, and the expansion of existing industrial
developments should be encouraged.
51
Figure #12
Source: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
1. Coordinate with the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, local
economic development organizations and chambers of commerce to foster planned growth
and with regard to the marketing and development of commercial and industrial areas of the
County, supporting intergovernmental agreements that seek to resolve conflicts which may
arise.
52
2. Encourage, assist and cooperate with local units of government and chambers of commerce
to support and provide programs of benefit to existing employers for the retention and
expansion of their local economic base, and that are attractive to potential employers.
3. Support and assist local government entities in the preservation of downtown buildings as
redevelopment opportunities.
4. Encourage and assist local communities in the promotion, retention and expansion of their
local industrial base, and encourage the redevelopment of brownfields areas which are now,
or have been previously, economically important to the County.
5. Work with rural communities to expand commercial and office opportunities that meet rural
needs.
6. Encourage and promote agricultural-related business and industry in Washington County
including research of and production of agricultural-related goods and services.
7. Establish and recommend high quality model design techniques, innovations and
preservation standards for new development throughout the County, requiring that
commercial developments preserve and enhance natural features such as local vegetation,
wildlife, wetlands, topography and scenic vistas through the coordination of design
guidelines and the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances.
8. Work with municipalities concerning the detriments of unplanned development outside
municipal boundaries and seek to prevent this practice.
9. Prevent sprawling non-agricultural uses in unincorporated areas that are not an integral part
of an area development plan, and encourage appropriate transportation-serving uses at
highway intersections.
10. Encourage planned commercial and office parks to maximize infrastructure investment, to
reduce storm water impacts and to produce a more efficient commercial environment by
encouraging sites at designated intersections, including parking, access, lighting and signage.
11. Encourage and promote agricultural-related business in rural Washington County including
the production, sale and research of agricultural-related goods and services.
53
Goal:
OPEN SPACE, RECREATION,
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
AND
Plan and guide all development decisions to consider the conservation and wise use
of our air, soil, water resources and the natural environment of Washington County
so that what results is an attractive and healthful total environment, both natural and
man-made.
Objectives
1. To preserve Washington County open space as the cornerstone of natural resource protection.
2. To encourage the retention of open space for recreation, wildlife habitat, historical and
archaeological preservation and conservation.
3. To protect environmentally sensitive areas from deterioration or destruction by private or public
actions.
4. To foster public awareness, education, and support of environmental and open space
management.
5. To enhance the County's visual identity and community character by preserving natural areas,
landscapes, and scenic vistas, including the historic, cultural, and archaeological resources they
incorporate.
6. To provide a variety of Countywide outdoor settings and recreational activities in proportion to
the needs of an expanding population.
7. To encourage the protection of floodplains, wetlands and the natural drainage systems, and to
encourage watershed level storm water management practices.
8. To encourage the protection, preservation and conservation of prime soils for agricultural use.
9. To ensure that the extraction of mineral resources occurs with minimal environmental impact
and within adopted regulations of the State and County.
10. To achieve public awareness that a major component of the natural environment is an interacting
system of land and water resources.
11. To protect and enhance the quantity and quality of potable ground water and potable surface
water supplies for current and future generations.
12. To protect and improve the surface water quality and beneficial uses of ponds, lakes, rivers,
streams, and wetlands.
13. To reduce point source discharges of pollutants into lakes, rivers, and streams.
14. To reduce non-point source discharges of pollutants into ponds, lakes, rivers and streams.
15. To foster, through watershed planning, a better understanding of our finite and irreplaceable
water resources, and how they are affected by changes in the natural environment and land use
and development activities.
54
Function of Open Space

There are two chief functions of open space: environmental protection and community well-being.
Well-planned open space areas can serve both of these functions and provide a crucial link between
the natural and human environments.
Open space provides environmental protection through (1) natural areas preservation (2) wildlife and
native plant habitat protection; (3) surface water quality protection; (4) non-structural flood control;
and (5) protection of ground water systems.
Open space provides community well-being through: (1) community identity and separation; (2)
aesthetic qualities preservation; (3) recreational opportunities; (4) transportation opportunities; (5)
educational and spiritual enrichment; (6) cultural and scientific resource protection; and (7) property
value enhancement.
Open space as used in this context includes recreation and conservation areas. This category reflects
existing ownership of larger properties, generally over ten acres in size, by public and private bodies.
These existing areas provide a framework for the provision of additional open space, recreation and
conservation areas through linkages and expansions.
The open space areas relate directly to the various functions of open space. They range in size and
function from small playgrounds, providing active recreational opportunities, to several hundredacre areas, offering wildlife habitats, natural area protection, and passive recreational pursuits. Also
included are private and institutional land holdings. Although these areas may or may not be
generally accessible to the public, they do provide a number of recreational and open space functions
and the plan recommends connecting them to other open space areas when feasible. These lands
include trails and greenways, major state recreation facilities, large parks -- areas that provide
visual open space and community separation, preserve important woodlands and wetlands, protect
critical wildlife habitats, and also provide important scientific, cultural and ]educational
opportunities to the citizens of Washington County.
This category includes areas recommended for both public and private open space uses. The
provision of additional open space is considered an important part of the County's planning program.
The areas indicated could become either major additions to existing public open space or serve as
linear connections, trails or storm water corridors between larger areas of open space. Areas along
and adjacent to some of the existing open space lands should be preserved in the countywide open
space system.
WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Many of Washington County's water resources reach beyond County boundaries. Hence, federal,
state and regional coordination is needed for effective water resource management in the County and
across Illinois. At the local level, the County and its municipalities need to continue to strengthen
55
implementation measures to protect and manage the quality of its water resources, especially the
shallow aquifers.
Water Resource Protection Guidelines
Ground Water:
Proper handling and disposal of chemicals and fertilizers
Proper installation and maintenance of private sewage disposal facilities
Lining of landfills and proper treatment of leachate
Sealing of abandoned wells
Use of water conservation plumbing fixtures and repair of plumbing leaks
Use of native plants
Surface Water:
Soil erosion and sediment control on construction sites
Conservation tillage and proper application of chemicals and fertilizers for agriculture production
Best management practices for new site development
River, stream, and wetland buffer strips
Ground Water and Surface Water
Reduce air pollution from fossil fuels that create acid rain
Reuse and recycle wastewater
Wetland protection and recreation
Appropriate planning and management of wastewater discharges from new development.
FLOOD PLAIN AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

The challenge facing Washington County is to support agriculture and accommodate future growth
while maintaining high water quality and sufficient water quantity throughout the County.
Watershed planning is the most effective means of addressing countywide water quality issues
because it is a holistic approach that encompasses (1) minimizing impervious surfaces, (2) utilizing
best management practices, and (3) cooperative governmental planning for the management of
streams, lakes, wetlands, flood plains, storm water, and wastewater throughout an entire watershed.
56
The 208 Water Quality Management Plan

In 1972 Congress approved the Clean Water Act which set very high water quality goals for the
nation. The Clean Water Act requires that plans for restoring and maintaining water quality be
prepared at the areawide level. In compliance with that mandate the208 Areawide Water Quality
Management Plan in 1979 for Southwestern Illinois was developed by the Southwestern Illinois
Planning Commission. The 208 Plan recommends to local governments strategies to control both
point and non-point sources of pollution by emphasizing:
1. Restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the region's
waters.
2. Elimination of all pollutant discharges into the region's waterways.
3. Water quality that provides for the protection and propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and
provides for human recreation, wherever attainable.
Point Sources:
Conventional wastewater treatment plants
Combined sewer overflows
Industrial plants
Illegal septic pumpage dumping
Yard waste dumping
Mining operations
Landfills
Feed lot and livestock runoff
Non-Point Sources:
Construction site soil erosion
Agricultural soil erosion
Agricultural chemical runoff
Lawn chemical runoff
Impervious surface runoff, including oils, grease, gasoline spills, tire wear, de-icing salts, etc., from
roadways, driveways and parking lots
Acid rain from air pollution
57
River and Stream Management:

The federal government supports several programs directed at stream protection through the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Illinois Department
of Natural Resources regulates stream modification.
A key best management practice (BMP) in river and stream management is to protect the river and
stream corridor. The corridor then acts as a buffer strip to protect stream banks from erosion, filter
out pollutants, store and transport flood waters, provide wildlife and aquatic habitat, and screen
sensitive areas from potential adverse effects of development.
The Biological Stream Characterization (BSC) program is a five-tiered classification system ranging
from excellent to very poor and was developed by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and
the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The BSC rating was instituted to determine the
environmental condition of streams and to monitor changes in the streams over time. As
Washington County experiences growth and development, it is essential that the BSC rating for each
individual stream be maintained and improved wherever possible.
Wetland Management
Wetlands are a sensitive environmental resource, integral to the hydrologic cycle. Wetlands are
ecosystems periodically inundated by water. There are several types of wetlands, differentiated by
duration of water inundation, soils, topography, and plant species. Wetland types found in
Washington County are wet prairie, marsh, fen, bog, swamp, and riverine wetlands.
Wetlands provide multiple uses and benefits to the human and natural communities in Washington
County. Some of these are: (1) provide temporary floodwater and runoff storage; (2) protect water
quality by absorbing floodwater contaminants; (3) provide important wildlife habitat through food,
water, cover, nesting, and breeding grounds; (4) shape urban form by serving as logical boundaries
to development and by buffering incompatible land use; (5) provide educational and passive
recreational opportunities; and (6) enhance the natural beauty of the area.
Ecological Functions Of Wetlands
Protect the quality of surface waters by slowing the erosive forces of moving water.
Reduce flood peaks by providing a natural means of flood control, pollution filtering, and
storm water damage protection, thereby protecting against the loss of life and property.
Improve water quality by intercepting and reducing water-borne sediments, excess nutrients,
heavy metals, and other pollutants.
58
Provide food and shelter, breeding, spawning, nesting and wintering habitats for fish and
wildlife, including migratory birds and commercially and recreationally important species.
Provide habitat protection for many threatened and endangered species of plants and animals.
Currently, at the federal level, large wetlands are protected from major development activities by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Resource limitations constrain the Corps from protecting small
wetlands, like some found in Washington County. At the state level, the Illinois Department of
Natural Resources reviews projects impacting streams, lakes, and wetlands.
Wetland management entails protection, enhancement and sometimes wetland mitigation banking.
It is necessary that County wetlands be protected and enhanced because of their role in water
resource management.
Wetland Mitigation Banking
Wetland mitigation can involve wetland banking, a method of compensating for wetland losses due
to development. Wetland mitigation banking is the construction of a large wetland in a central
location from which project owners or others may purchase credits to compensate for unavoidable
impacts on small wetland areas. The idea of wetland banking emerged in the early 1980s when it
was becoming clear that on-site mitigation of wetlands by developers lacking wetland expertise were
often unsuccessful. Construction of a wetland bank involves the expertise of ecologists to help
ensure the success of the new larger wetland. Both the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) are generally supportive of mitigation banking.
Flood Plain Management
A flood plain is an area of low-lying, flat ground on either side of a river, stream, pond, or lake
subject to periodic inundation by flooding. Flood plains perform important drainage and hydrologic
functions. After heavy rains, snow melt, or ice jams, rivers and streams may overflow their banks
causing considerable damage. Any loss of flood plains will cause increased flooding and damage,
especially upstream.
In addition to drainage, flood plains also (1) control pollution by settling out sediment from slow
moving waters in flood storage areas; (2) provide wildlife habitat; (3) provide passive recreation
areas for hiking, bicycling, and cross country skiing and active recreation areas such as playing
fields; (4) shape urban form; and (5) enhance scenic beauty.
Federal and state agencies provide only minimum regulations for new developments in flood plains.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires only that new structures in flood
plains be elevated to the level of the 100-year flood; this regulation is enforced in coordination with
59
the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources (formerly, the Illinois
Department of Transportation, Division of Water Resources). The Office of Water Resources has
encouraged local governments to adopt more stringent standards for development in flood plains.
1. Implement an open space and greenway system for its environmental, aesthetic, social, and
economic benefit.
2. Protect biodiversity by preserving, re-generating, and restoring natural areas.
3. Incorporate environmental design criteria in development controls and County ordinances to
protect natural, scenic, historic, archeological, and environmental areas and to minimize
adverse impacts.
4. Encourage the increased use of non-acquisition techniques such as conservation easements,
and dedications as useful methods for implementing local, County, and regional open space
plans.
5. Coordinate open space planning and preservation with protection and maintenance of County
water resources.
6. Encourage a network of natural corridors, primarily along waterways and interconnecting
protected areas, to permit wildlife movement between areas.
7. Encourage the protection, preservation and conservation of groundwater and surface water
quality.
8. Encourage alternatives to septic systems and high chemical input soil uses.
9. Encourage the development of open space for the recreation, aesthetic and ecological needs
of the County.
10. Encourage environmentally sustainable recreational uses of land in floodplains and areas
adjacent to waterways and other natural open space.
11. Protect ground water, a key source of potable water in Washington County, and encourage
water conservation programs.
12. Develop a comprehensive set of countywide water resource management regulations which
preserve and protect watersheds, stream banks, flood plains, wetlands, and ground water
recharge areas.
13. Require new developments to document and report proposed sources of potable water
supply.
60
14. Preserve and improve the water quality of Washington County in order to maximize the
potential for wildlife habitat, recreational, and other uses.
15. Manage wastewater treatment in an effective and environmentally sound manner conducive
to public health, including the encouragement of wastewater recycling and reuse systems
with land application to eliminate point discharge of wastewater into creeks.
16. Develop a multiple use/multiple benefit demonstration site in a selected watershed to
effectively demonstrate how integrated land use and water resource management improves
stream quality.
17. Protect and preserve wetlands as an essential component of the hydrological system and
wildlife habitat, and restore degraded wetland areas where possible.
18. Promote and encourage the use of design techniques, best management practices, and other
methods to ensure that imperviousness within developing watersheds is minimized.
19. Encourage municipalities to adopt the same or similar regulations for storm water, soil
erosion and sediment controls.
20. Support multi-county watershed planning that will build upon the Kaskaskia and other
Watershed Planning Teams support for necessary storm water legislation.
21. Support land use, zoning and site development standards that are responsive to flood
protection issues such as the requirement for on-site detention/retention systems and reduced
erosion and sedimentation.
22. Support the protection and creation of wetlands for storm water storage and bio-filtration as
well as for fish and wildlife habitats.
23. Support and encourage agricultural practices that reduce runoff, peak flows, erosion and
sedimentation.
24. Enforce storm water drainage and detention, soil erosion and sediment control regulations for
new development and redevelopment within the County.
25. Enforce countywide flood plain and storm water management regulations which preserve and
protect watersheds, stream banks, flood plains and wetlands.
61
Goal: HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Protect and maintain local historic and cultural resources that preserve and
contribute to the character of Washington County.
Objectives
1. To protect and maintain historic resources that contribute character and attractiveness to
Washington County and provide an identity and a sense of place.
2. To encourage economic development and increased property values through historic
preservation and restoration.
3. To promote and enhance tourism within the County.
4. To provide educational opportunities regarding the value of the Countys archaeological,
architectural and historic assets.
5. To coordinate the Countys preservation efforts with those of municipalities and with state,
federal and private historic preservation agencies.
Focus
The goal of an historic preservation program is to preserve the unique character of the County and to
protect its valuable historic resources. A historic preservation program addresses a variety of issues,
including the preservation and redevelopment of older structures in the various municipalities,
protection of historic resources and landscape, and to balance new development.
This element examines:
Historic Preservation Character; and
Historic Preservation Resources.
HISTORIC RESOURCE PRESERVATION

The preservation of the Countys historic resources is accomplished through integrated planning,
continued and adaptive use of existing sites, providing information and resources for maintaining
older buildings, and public education and awareness of preservation issues and solutions.
62
Currently, there are three buildings on the National Register of Historic Places in Washington County:
Table 10
National Register of Historic Places Buildings
NAME
IMAGE
DATE
LISTED
LOCATION
Louisville and Nashville RR Depot
03/01/1985
101 E. Railroad St, Nashville
Original Springs Hotel and Bathhouse
12/22/1978
506 N. Hanover St., Okawville
Frank Schlosser Complex
08/15/1983
W. Walnut St., Okawville
An important part of historic resource protection is to demonstrate how existing buildings can
continue to meet the demands of contemporary life. This can be accomplished through sensitive
rehabilitation and by construction of additions that complement the scale and character of the
building and neighborhood. Creative solutions for upgrading structural, mechanical, electrical and
plumbing systems are available for commercial and residential buildings. Careful planning with
regard to zoning and land use issues can increase the availability of existing buildings to meet
changing uses and demands.
Continued and regular maintenance is crucial to protecting the integrity and future use of historic
buildings and homes. Building neglect reinforces public perception that old buildings are of little
value.
Successful historic preservation efforts require citizen support. The general public needs to be
educated to the importance of Washington Countys historic resources.
63
1. Encourage the preservation of older structures to retain a sense of identity, visual beauty, and
architectural diversity.
2. Facilitate the reuse of existing buildings in ways appropriate to their character.
3. Encourage new development through economic development incentives that encourage
compatibility with existing architecture.
4. Support municipalities in their historic preservation efforts.
5. Provide technical information to assist property owners in research and restoration efforts.
64
GOAL: TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
Provide safe, efficient transportation systems that guide future development
and that are compatible with existing land uses. Transportation.
Objectives
To foster efficient movement of traffic and goods into, within and out of the County.
To pursue improvement of the Countys transportation system in order to support continuing

growth and development of the Countys economy.
To assess the need for public transit services and facilities in order to provide increased
mobility to potential transit riders.
To provide for increased mobility of persons and goods to reach destination points with less
cost and time investments.
To develop a balanced intermodal transportation system that facilitates commerce, reduces

congestion, adds to the available travel options, and increases personal mobility.
To coordinate the transportation element with other planning efforts including land use, open
space/recreation, economic development and other regional, state and federal transportation
planning activities so that transportation systems can accommodate the travel needs
generated by land use.
To preserve the rural roads and scenic vistas of Washington County.
FOCUS
The future transportation system in Washington County will be affected by a number of factors.
These factors may include existing road patterns, major impediments to traffic, location of major
new traffic generators, growth trends, construction of new roads, and the location preferences of new
development. Although the County cannot control all the factors that will influence its future
transportation system it can provide some direction as a guide to achieving an adequate and efficient
system through its zoning and subdivision regulations and in its future development decision
making.
Typical suburban land use patterns are a leading cause of traffic congestion, which in turn
contributes issues with the local quality of life. Balancing new growth with transportation
65
enhancements is the primary means of achieving mobility while protecting the Countys
environment and community character.
THE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE RELATIONSHIP
The key factors relating land use and transportation involve where people live in relation to their
place of work, shopping and services, and the means people use in getting to and from their
destination. Where people live, work and shop is a land use concern. How people travel represents
the land use and transportation relationship. In Washington County the most common mode of
transportation is single occupant vehicle primarily because the primary residential land use pattern is
the sing-family home which is usually located at a distance from work and services. These singlefamily homes produce more vehicle trips than any other type of residential land use, especially in the
absence of meaningful public transportation.
Right-of-way protections and preservation is essential for the proper coordination of land
development and transportation improvement. Within Washington County rail, highways and
utilities occupy rights-of-way. Regional policy, in the form of updated subdivision regulations
allows for the protection of existing rights-of-way and future corridors.
There needs to be a balance between land use and transportation services. Long range planning for
transportation provides the coordination needed to achieve mobility, cost efficiency and
environmental protection.
1. Adopt an Official Map designating arterial and collector routes for Washington County.
2. Coordinate transportation improvements with watershed planning efforts.
3. Coordinate County transportation improvements with affected municipalities, Townships, and
Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT).
66
Goal: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT
Maintain a sound and diversified economic base for Washington County
while preserving the rural and small town atmosphere of the County, characterized by an attractive
and healthy environment which can be adequately served by transportation facilities, community
facilities, public utilities and other urban services and amenities.
Objectives
1. To encourage balanced development within the County.
2. To preserve Countys agricultural base.
3. To provide for economic diversity within the County.
4. To provide for protection of natural resources and recreational opportunities.
5. To portray the Countys rich historical heritage and foster the important tourism industry.
ISSUE FOCUS
Economic Development provides jobs, tax revenue, sources of goods and services, and markets for
agricultural products. Community development enhances the provision of public services and
general quality of life. Economic Development opportunities bring with them inevitable change and
growth that needs to be carefully managed and planned.
Community Development
The management of development is best done by encouraging that activity to take place in locations
that minimize the negative impacts and maximize the benefits of development. Those locations that
reduce the negative impacts and maximize the benefits of development are in and around existing
municipalities within Washington County. In those locations are public water supplies, public
sanitary sewers and stormwater management.
The most opportune method of encouraging development to occur in and around existing
municipalities is the creation of an incentive overlay district - planned growth areas - around
those municipalities. The incentive overlay district reduces minimum lot size by the level of
public utilities and stormwater management provided.
67
Washington County will be approaching a crossroad in the future due to growth and expanding
municipal boundaries. The choice of balanced and managed growth depends on the cooperation of
the cities and villages within the County, where expanding municipal boundaries, extension of
public utilities and critical land use decisions will be made.
Economic Development
The focus of this issue is the status of existing economic activity and conditions, and looks to what
future conditions might be desirable. Economic development is not only described by the type and
level of business activity, but recognizes the importance of attracting dollars to the local economy,
and having those dollar circulate for as long as possible in the local area before they are lost to other
geographical areas. This spending of local dollars outside the local area is called leakage.
Goals and objectives for Community and Economic Development are intended to identify potential
opportunities to pursue appropriate community and economic development activities.
1. Enhance efforts for development opportunities along Interstate-64 and exploit the existence of
three interstate interchanges within the County.
2. Poise the County to take advantage of emerging development related to the Prairie State Energy
Generating Campus and the future of hydraulic fracturing activities.
3. Encourage commercial and recreational development opportunities around Washington County
Lake.
4. Actively pursue opportunities for the expansion of the employment base of the County.
5. Encourage diversification of skills and educational backgrounds for the labor force of
Washington County, and partner with efforts of South Central Illinois Growth Alliance (SCIGA) and
Kaskaskia.
6. Enhance the agricultural economic base and roots of the County.
7. Work with areawide economic development organizations and others to assist in the retention and
expansion of existing businesses.
8. Develop an active marketing effort of the County to attract new business and industry.
68
9. Consider the hiring of an Economic Development Coordinator for the County, or enlisting a
contractor for Economic Development activity for the County, to ensure a more organized approach
as well as to coordinate with the activities of the municipalities and other state and federal entities.
10. Improve the Countys website and web presence on the internet making it a tool for branding
and marketing the County.
69
GOAL: PUBLIC SAFETY
Continue to provide for high quality public safety and emergency services that
meet the needs of all residents of Washington County.
Objectives
1. To foster high quality law enforcement protection throughout Washington County in a costeffective coordinated manner.
2. To foster high quality fire protection and ambulance services throughout Washington County in
a cost-effective manner.
3. To encourage high quality emergency dispatch throughout Washington County in a costeffective manner.
4. To support disaster mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery from all types of disasters.
As growth and development occurs in Washington County it becomes even more important to consider
the potential impacts to existing and future residents. Protection of the health, safety and welfare of
citizens is a paramount responsibility of County government. Coordination of law enforcement, fire
protection, ambulance and emergency dispatch, the Emergency Services and Disaster Agency (ESDA)
and the County Health Department needs to be a priority of County government in a coordinated and
cost-effective manner, and in coordination with municipalities, state and federal governments.
1. Assist the municipal, regional, state and federal governmental agencies in protecting the
health, safety and welfare of its citizens.
2. Promote crime prevention through the use of innovative prevention programs.
3. Encourage the strict enforcement of public safety standards and consider adoption of
applicable building codes.
4. Support continued cooperation between the separate emergency dispatch agencies.
5. Maintain a strong Ambulance Service and County Hospital.
70
Goal: COOPERATIVE PLANNING

Washington County will work closely with the various local jurisdictions
within the County to achieve a shared community vision for the region.
Objective:
Coordinated planning efforts and development with Federal and State entities as well as regional
partners and municipalities within the County.
FOCUS
This 2036 Comprehensive Plan focuses on the County's efforts and needs to manage the land within
its borders to maintain and improve the quality of life for all County residents. Managing land and
how it is used is what this Plan is all about.
Management of any asset for any purpose always involves choices. Those choices involve costs,
methods, timing and results desired. The recommendations for implementing this plan involve those
same variables. The additional element the County must consider is the choice and application of
specific tools to use in its management efforts.
County-Municipal Cooperation
Perhaps the most important recommendation in the Plan is for County-Municipal cooperation.
Previous subjects in the Plan note areas where cooperation is necessary for each party to be
successful.
Areas of cooperation include, but are not limited to:
a) The mile and one-half area around municipalities where the County and the municipality
have certain statutory planning and enforcement rights
b) Watershed planning for water quality and storm water purposes necessarily involves
multiple political jurisdictions
c) Transportation planning always involves multiple political jurisdictions.
d) Greenways, trails and large recreation facilities benefit multiple political jurisdictions.
To initiate a process for cooperation with municipalities the County could select a limited objective
in one or more of the four preceding subjects a) through d); select a geographic area where an
opportunity or problem exists and approach the municipality(s) involved with an offer to form a
planning partnership for a specific purpose.
71
1. Work with the various jurisdictions within Washington County to achieve consensus and a
shared community vision.
2. Establish a regular visioning component as part of the on going planning process to achieve an
understanding of the evolution of the Countys Goals, Objectives, and Policies.
72
APPENDIX
73
Rd
2036 LAND
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Cedar
Sassafras
Rd
Tree Rd
Rd
Tower
Rd
Pleasant
Grove
Rd
Rd
Rd
County
Indiana
Rd
Nebraska
Nevada
Van Buren
21
County
Rd
Hwy 23
Rd
New York
Rd
December 2015
Posen
Rd
CenterRd
Rd
Dakota
N
Rd
Swanwick Rd
Aster Rd
Coulterville Rd
Corn Flower
County
Rd
Dubois
op
ckt
Bla
Honeysuckle
Tidlen
Rd
Youth
No.
Radom
Rd
Oklahoma
Rd
Black
Pierce
Blac
kto
p
Rd
Rd
No. Carolina
Rd
Rd
So Dakota
16
Creek
H
wy
ty
Co
un
Rd
Rd
Diam
on
Hw
y
Co
un
Kennedy
Locust
Rd
Washington
County Lake
Conservation
ty
McKinley Rd
Rd
Peony
Carter
Hwy 12
Rd
Rd
Howard
Lincoln
Oak
dale
Hill
Unincorporated R-2 Residential
Rd
Quarry Rd
Rd
on
Pleasant
Rd
ail
Rd
Rd
Peony
Hoover
Hwy 10
Kansas
Rd
Rd
Louisiana Rd
Kentucky
Creek
Special Use for Industry
Iowa
Georgia
Tucker
Church Rd
Sugar
Industrial and Commercial
Rd
Ashley Lake
Tr
Rd
Twin Lakes Rd
Idaho
Michigan
Liberty
Texas
on
ris
r
Ha
ale
kd
Oa
Rd
Incorporated Growth Areas
Rd
Rd
Rd
Hwy 21
Rd
Blackjack
Rd
Rd
Clover
Rd
Lilac Rd
Hwy 29
Flood Hazards Areas
Rd
Rd
Half Acre
Coolidge
County
h
urc
len
Hah
Rd
County
Open Space
Highline
ian
Ind
Hwy 12
Ch
Elkton
Jo
hns
Hwy
Rd
Rd
Richview
Rd
County
Rock Rd
County
Massachusetts
Rd
Rd
Lakes and Reservoirs

Rd
Richview
Arizona
Rd
Alabama
Wyoming
School
Hill Church
Grand
Adams
Major Streams
Orange
Rd
Elkender
Rd
Todd
Jimtown
Apple
Plum
Rd
Nashville Lake
Weaver
South
Rd
Daisy
Irvinton
Rd
Rd
Rd
Rd
Hwy 10
Marissa Rd
Rd
Rd
Rd
Jefferson
Rave
nt
Gra
Marigold
Rd
Maple
Chestnut
Mockingbird
Plum
Rd
Rd
Primrose
Rd
Creek
Church
Little Prairie
Stone
Tulip
e
Peabody Min
Tree
Post
Rd
Maine
County
Marigold
Tree
U.S. Highway-State Highway

Local Roads
Minor Streams
Rd
Rd
Rd
Rd
Rd
Iris
Rd
Hedge
California
Darm stadt
Blueberry
Holly
Rd
N. Creek
Rd
Interstate Highway
Rd
Rd
so
n
County
Schwering
School
Rd
Dove
Sweetgum
Tree
Rd
13
Hwy
Rd
Rd
Sandpiper
Owl Rd
Hwy 12
Church
Rd
Stone
ff
er
Finch
County
Nuthatch
Cowbird
Lo
uis
Je
Peacock Rd
Rd
Apricot
Birch
Eagle
Rd
Railroads
Ash
Rd
Meridian
Rd
Oriole
Lark
Rd
St
Night hawk
Rd
Hwy
County
Rd
Rd
Rd
Aspen
Rd
Maple
Hwy 6
Field
Rd
Field
Rd
Cattle Pen
Rd
Rd
Barnsw
all
ow
Ol
d
Sunbird
18
Peach
Dogwood
Oak
Rd
Wren
County
Whipporwill
(U.S. Route 51)
Rd
N Priarie
Wild
Woodduck
Crane Dr
Legend
Proposed Road Realignment
Rd
School
Rd
Skylark Rd
Prairie
Warbler Rd
Tree
Elm
Magnolia
Branch
Cherry
Quail
Rd
Liberty
Falcon
Rd
Rd
Hummingbird
Rd
Mallard
Rd
Hwy 6
er Rd
Pintail
Rd
Cattle
ty
Co
un
Ebenez
Rd
Pin
il R
ta
County
Rd
Church
Oriole
Cardinal
Bottom
Pen
12
Hw
y
Railroad
Oak
Pin
Grouse
Spook
Turkey
Rd
Rd
Stuffshoak Rd
Rd
School Rd
Sawmill Rd
Rd
Carnary Rd
5th Street Rd
White
Rd
8
Circle
Cord
Bluejay
River
Prairie
Rd
Cardinal
Klasing
Bluebird
Rd
Rd
Rd
Rd
Chickadee
Hill
Walnut
Hogshead
Rd
Rd
Rd
Nightingale
Ford Rd
Coon
Covington
Rd
Coal
Flamingo
Rd
Bluff
Rd
Rd
Heron
Waterworks Rd
Rd
Rd
Blackbird
Washington County, Illinois
Sweetgum
Meridian
Rd
Rd
Alley
Rd
County
Rd
Hwy 18
Rd
Rd
Rd
Poplar
Rd
Sycamore
Dog
Rd
Rd
Blacktop
Tennessee
Rd
Rd
Enterprise Zones
&
Special Features
Washington County Land Management Plan
Storck Woods
Nature Preserve
January 2016
IO
UN
DIRECTORY OF COAL MINES IN ILLINOIS
Washington
County
This directory accompanies the Illinois Coal
Mines map or maps for this County.
January 2015
Prairie Research Institute

Illinois State Geological Survey
615 East Peabody Drive
Champaign, Illinois 61820
(217) 333-4747
http//:www.isgs.illinois.edu
INTRODUCTION
Coal has been mined in 76 counties. More than 7,400 coal mines have operated since
commercial mining began in Illinois circa 1810. Our maps of known mines for each county
may help the public to identify mined areas. This accompanying coal mine directory provides
basic information about the coal mines. Please note, however, that the accuracy and
completeness of the maps and directories vary depending on the availability and quality of
source material. Little or no information is available for many mines, especially the older
ones, because mining activity was not regulated or documented until the late 1800's. Even
then, reporting requirements were minimal.
The coal mine maps are maps compiled by the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) of
known mines: underground and surface coal mines as well as underground industrial mineral
mines. Buffer regions for industrial mineral underground mines were incorporated into the
maps due to limited information regarding these mines. The size of the buffer region is
dependent on the uncertainty or inaccuracy of the mine location based on the quality of the
source material. For more information regarding industrial mineral mines please contact the
ISGS Industrial Minerals Section.
In cooperation with the Illinois State Geological Survey, the Office of Mines and Minerals (a
division of the Department of Natural Resources) is in search of old underground mine maps
of Illinois. Many of the undocumented maps are believed to be in libraries, historical societies
and personal files of old mine employees. The Department asks that anyone who knows of
one of these maps, please contact the Department at (618) 650-3197 or by emailing
rgibson@siue.edu. A map specialist will come to your location, if you wish. Otherwise maps
can be mailed, or you may stop by one of our offices in Edwardsville, Springfield, Ottawa, or
Benton. These maps will be checked against existing inventory. If they are found to be a new
discovery, they will be electronically imaged and returned to the owner (if requested).
MINE MAPS
The mined areas are shown on county base maps at a scale of 1:100,000.
Three types of mine information are shown on the maps: an index number that identifies the
mine in the directory, a symbol that marks the 'location' of the mine, and an outline of the
mined area if that is known. The location is almost always the site of the main mine opening
or, in the case of surface mines, the location of the tipple (coal washing and storage facility).
The type of symbol indicates whether the opening is a shaft, drift, or slope and whether the
mine is active or abandoned. Another symbol represents a mine with an uncertain type of
portal and/or uncertain location. When the exact location is unknown, the symbol is placed in
the center of the section or quarter section in which the mine was reported to exist. If a mine
cannot be located within a section, it is not shown on the map, but is listed in the directory.
The boundaries of the mined areas are also shown for most of the mines; however, for some
mines the only information available is the location of the main opening. There are three
types of coal-mined areas: underground, surface, and indefinite--which are shaded with
different patterns. The underground mines also show large blocks of unmined coal within the
mine, when that information is available. The indefinite areas, which have been plotted from
sketchy or incomplete information, usually are underground workings, although the directory
should be consulted to determine the specific mine type.
For most counties, one map shows all known mines. However, in Gallatin, Saline, Vermilion,
and Williamson Counties, several seams have been extensively mined. For the sake of
readability, separate maps have been produced for the mines in each seam. Mines in the
Herrin Coal are shown on one map, those in the Springfield Coal are shown on another, and
the mines in all other coals are shown on a third map. In Vermilion County, the mines that
operated in the Herrin and the Danville Coals are presented on separate maps.
Quadrangle maps at 1:24,000 scale have been completed for select areas and contain more
detailed outlines with directories that contain more detailed coal mine information. The maps
and directories are available as downloadable PDF files or can be purchased. Please visit
the ISGS web site for more information.
MINE DIRECTORIES
Each county directory is keyed to the mine map by the mine index number; the directory
provides basic information about the coal mines shown on the map. The data have been
compiled from a variety of sources such as the annual Coal Report of the Illinois Office of
Mines and Minerals and field notes taken by ISGS geologists. The information presented in
the table is described below. A blank in any column indicates that information is not available
for that item. Again, we welcome any additional information that you may have.
ISGS Index Each mine in the state is identified with a unique number; this number is
shown on the map and is the link between the map and the directory. The number is
permanently assigned to a mine regardless of changes in the mine name, ownership, or
operator.
Company Name A mine may have been operated by more than one company or the
operating company may have changed its name. Separate entries in the directory show each
name and the years of operation under the name. In many instances, names have been
abbreviated to fit within the space available.
Mine Name and Mine Number An entry is included for each name and/or number the mine
operated under, even if the company name remained the same. Many companies use the
same name for all their mines, but differentiate them by number. Again, abbreviations have
been used where necessary.
Mine Type Underground mines are either "shaft," "slope," or "drift" which refers to the type
of opening used to remove the coal from the mine. In shaft mines the coal is removed
through a vertical shaft. Slope designates mines in which the coal is removed via a sloping
incline from the ground surface to the mining level. In slope mines, miners and equipment
may use either the slope or a vertical shaft to get into the mine. A drift mine is an
underground mine that is excavated where the coal outcrops in the side of a bluff or the
highwall of a surface mine. The mine type for surface mines is "strip" because these mines
are more commonly called "strip mines."
Method This refers to the pattern by which the coal was removed. Most underground mines
in Illinois have used a type of room and pillar pattern, the areas where the coal is removed
are the 'rooms' with 'pillars' of coal left in place to support the roof. In some mines, the pillars
were later pulled to extract additional coal. The abbreviations are listed below and most are
illustrated in Figure 1.
RP
RPB
MRP
RPP
BRP
CRP
LW
HER
Room & Pillar; specific type unknown

Room & Pillar Basic; irregular panels, typical of old mines
Modified Room & Pillar; a somewhat more regular pattern than Room & Pillar Basic
Room and Pillar Panel; similar to Modified Room & Pillar
Blind Room and Pillar; every 6th or 7th room is left unmined to provide additional support
Checkerboard Room and Pillar; evenly spaced large pillars
Longwall; all coal is removed
Old longwall mines were backfilled with rock to provide support
Modern longwall mines allow roof to collapse behind as mining progresses
High Extraction Retreat; a form of Room & Pillar mining that extracts most of the coal
Years Operated Years that the mine operated; these dates may include periods when the
mine was idle or not in full operation. Dates of mining from different sources are sometimes
contradictory. The conventions that we have used to indicate where we were uncertain of
dates are as follows. If we know the full range of dates that a mine operated under a specific
name, those are given (1928-1934). If we know when a mine last operated, but not when it
began, we use a dash and end date (-1934). If we know that a mine operated in a particular
year, but not when it opened or closed, we just give the year we know (1920). To avoid
confusion with the previous case, if a mine opened and closed in the same year, the year is
repeated (1926-1926). In cases where a mine operated under different names, but we don't
know when the name change occurred, the full range of dates is given for all names (John
Smith Sr. Mine 1913-1944, Bill Smith Mine 1913-1944). A blank indicates that we have no
information on the dates that the mine operated.
Coal Seam Mined The seam name is that used by the Illinois State Geological Survey.
Figure 2 shows these coal seams in a stratigraphic column and provides a cross-reference to
other names commonly used for these coals. If a mine has operated in more than one seam,
there are separate entries in the table for each seam mined.
Location The location given is the site of the main portal or, for surface mines, the tipple. For
small surface mines, the pit and the tipple are assumed to be the same. The location is
based on the Public Land Survey System of townships and sections. Townships are
identified by a township (north-south) and range (east-west) designation such as T14N-R6E.
Townships are subdivided into approximately 36 one-square-mile sections, which are
numbered from 1 to 36.
ORDERING INFORMATION
A 1:100,000 scale color plot with the directory is available at a cost of $12.50. This can be
ordered by contacting the Information Office at (217) 244-2414 or sales@prairie.illinois.edu.
ACCURACY OF MAP
The maps and digital files used for this study were compiled from data obtained from a
variety of sources and have varying degrees of completeness and accuracy. They present
reasonable interpretations of the geology of the area and are based on available data.
These data were compiled and digitized at a scale of 1:62,500, except for areas where
quadrangle studies have been completed and the data was compiled at 1:24,000 or better.
Locations of some features may be offset by 500 feet or more due to errors in the original
source maps, the compilation process, digitizing, or a combination of these factors.
These data are not intended for use in site-specific screening or decision-making. Data
included in this map are suitable for use at a scale of 1:100,000.
DISCLAIMER
The Illinois State Geological Survey and the University of Illinois make no guarantee,
expressed or implied, regarding the correctness of the interpretations presented in this data
set and accept no liability for the consequences of decisions made by others on the basis of
the information presented here.
2014 University of Illinois Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. For permission
information, contact the Illinois State Geological Survey.
INTRODUCTION
Coal has been mined in 76 counties. More than 7,400 coal mines have operated since
commercial mining began in Illinois circa 1810. Our maps of known mines for each county
may help the public to identify mined areas. This accompanying coal mine directory provides
basic information about the coal mines. Please note, however, that the accuracy and
completeness of the maps and directories vary depending on the availability and quality of
source material. Little or no information is available for many mines, especially the older
ones, because mining activity was not regulated or documented until the late 1800's. Even
then, reporting requirements were minimal.
The coal mine maps are maps compiled by the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) of
known mines: underground and surface coal mines as well as underground industrial mineral
mines. Buffer regions for industrial mineral underground mines were incorporated into the
maps due to limited information regarding these mines. The size of the buffer region is
dependent on the uncertainty or inaccuracy of the mine location based on the quality of the
source material. For more information regarding industrial mineral mines please contact the
ISGS Industrial Minerals Section.
In cooperation with the Illinois State Geological Survey, the Office of Mines and Minerals (a
division of the Department of Natural Resources) is in search of old underground mine maps
of Illinois. Many of the undocumented maps are believed to be in libraries, historical societies
and personal files of old mine employees. The Department asks that anyone who knows of
one of these maps, please contact the Department at (618) 650-3197 or by emailing
rgibson@siue.edu. A map specialist will come to your location, if you wish. Otherwise maps
can be mailed, or you may stop by one of our offices in Edwardsville, Springfield, Ottawa, or
Benton. These maps will be checked against existing inventory. If they are found to be a new
discovery, they will be electronically imaged and returned to the owner (if requested).
MINE MAPS
The mined areas are shown on county base maps at a scale of 1:100,000.
Three types of mine information are shown on the maps: an index number that identifies the
mine in the directory, a symbol that marks the 'location' of the mine, and an outline of the
mined area if that is known. The location is almost always the site of the main mine opening
or, in the case of surface mines, the location of the tipple (coal washing and storage facility).
The type of symbol indicates whether the opening is a shaft, drift, or slope and whether the
mine is active or abandoned. Another symbol represents a mine with an uncertain type of
portal and/or uncertain location. When the exact location is unknown, the symbol is placed in
the center of the section or quarter section in which the mine was reported to exist. If a mine
cannot be located within a section, it is not shown on the map, but is listed in the directory.
The boundaries of the mined areas are also shown for most of the mines; however, for some
mines the only information available is the location of the main opening. There are three
types of coal-mined areas: underground, surface, and indefinite--which are shaded with
different patterns. The underground mines also show large blocks of unmined coal within the
mine, when that information is available. The indefinite areas, which have been plotted from
sketchy or incomplete information, usually are underground workings, although the directory
should be consulted to determine the specific mine type.
For most counties, one map shows all known mines. However, in Gallatin, Saline, Vermilion,
and Williamson Counties, several seams have been extensively mined. For the sake of
readability, separate maps have been produced for the mines in each seam. Mines in the
Herrin Coal are shown on one map, those in the Springfield Coal are shown on another, and
the mines in all other coals are shown on a third map. In Vermilion County, the mines that
operated in the Herrin and the Danville Coals are presented on separate maps.
Quadrangle maps at 1:24,000 scale have been completed for select areas and contain more
detailed outlines with directories that contain more detailed coal mine information. The maps
and directories are available as downloadable PDF files or can be purchased. Please visit
the ISGS web site for more information.
MINE DIRECTORIES
Each county directory is keyed to the mine map by the mine index number; the directory
provides basic information about the coal mines shown on the map. The data have been
compiled from a variety of sources such as the annual Coal Report of the Illinois Office of
Mines and Minerals and field notes taken by ISGS geologists. The information presented in
the table is described below. A blank in any column indicates that information is not available
for that item. Again, we welcome any additional information that you may have.
ISGS Index Each mine in the state is identified with a unique number; this number is
shown on the map and is the link between the map and the directory. The number is
permanently assigned to a mine regardless of changes in the mine name, ownership, or
operator.
Company Name A mine may have been operated by more than one company or the
operating company may have changed its name. Separate entries in the directory show each
name and the years of operation under the name. In many instances, names have been
abbreviated to fit within the space available.
Mine Name and Mine Number An entry is included for each name and/or number the mine
operated under, even if the company name remained the same. Many companies use the
same name for all their mines, but differentiate them by number. Again, abbreviations have
been used where necessary.
Mine Type Underground mines are either "shaft," "slope," or "drift" which refers to the type
of opening used to remove the coal from the mine. In shaft mines the coal is removed
through a vertical shaft. Slope designates mines in which the coal is removed via a sloping
incline from the ground surface to the mining level. In slope mines, miners and equipment
may use either the slope or a vertical shaft to get into the mine. A drift mine is an
underground mine that is excavated where the coal outcrops in the side of a bluff or the
highwall of a surface mine. The mine type for surface mines is "strip" because these mines
are more commonly called "strip mines."
Method This refers to the pattern by which the coal was removed. Most underground mines
in Illinois have used a type of room and pillar pattern, the areas where the coal is removed
are the 'rooms' with 'pillars' of coal left in place to support the roof. In some mines, the pillars
were later pulled to extract additional coal. The abbreviations are listed below and most are
illustrated in Figure 1.
RP
RPB
MRP
RPP
BRP
CRP
LW
HER
Room & Pillar; specific type unknown

Room & Pillar Basic; irregular panels, typical of old mines
Modified Room & Pillar; a somewhat more regular pattern than Room & Pillar Basic
Room and Pillar Panel; similar to Modified Room & Pillar
Blind Room and Pillar; every 6th or 7th room is left unmined to provide additional support
Checkerboard Room and Pillar; evenly spaced large pillars
Longwall; all coal is removed
Old longwall mines were backfilled with rock to provide support
Modern longwall mines allow roof to collapse behind as mining progresses
High Extraction Retreat; a form of Room & Pillar mining that extracts most of the coal
Years Operated Years that the mine operated; these dates may include periods when the
mine was idle or not in full operation. Dates of mining from different sources are sometimes
contradictory. The conventions that we have used to indicate where we were uncertain of
dates are as follows. If we know the full range of dates that a mine operated under a specific
name, those are given (1928-1934). If we know when a mine last operated, but not when it
began, we use a dash and end date (-1934). If we know that a mine operated in a particular
year, but not when it opened or closed, we just give the year we know (1920). To avoid
confusion with the previous case, if a mine opened and closed in the same year, the year is
repeated (1926-1926). In cases where a mine operated under different names, but we don't
know when the name change occurred, the full range of dates is given for all names (John
Smith Sr. Mine 1913-1944, Bill Smith Mine 1913-1944). A blank indicates that we have no
information on the dates that the mine operated.
Coal Seam Mined The seam name is that used by the Illinois State Geological Survey.
Figure 2 shows these coal seams in a stratigraphic column and provides a cross-reference to
other names commonly used for these coals. If a mine has operated in more than one seam,
there are separate entries in the table for each seam mined.
Location The location given is the site of the main portal or, for surface mines, the tipple. For
small surface mines, the pit and the tipple are assumed to be the same. The location is
based on the Public Land Survey System of townships and sections. Townships are
identified by a township (north-south) and range (east-west) designation such as T14N-R6E.
Townships are subdivided into approximately 36 one-square-mile sections, which are
numbered from 1 to 36.
ORDERING INFORMATION
A 1:100,000 scale color plot with the directory is available at a cost of $12.50. This can be
ordered by contacting the Information Office at (217) 244-2414 or sales@prairie.illinois.edu.
ACCURACY OF MAP
The maps and digital files used for this study were compiled from data obtained from a
variety of sources and have varying degrees of completeness and accuracy. They present
reasonable interpretations of the geology of the area and are based on available data.
These data were compiled and digitized at a scale of 1:62,500, except for areas where
quadrangle studies have been completed and the data was compiled at 1:24,000 or better.
Locations of some features may be offset by 500 feet or more due to errors in the original
source maps, the compilation process, digitizing, or a combination of these factors.
These data are not intended for use in site-specific screening or decision-making. Data
included in this map are suitable for use at a scale of 1:100,000.
DISCLAIMER
The Illinois State Geological Survey and the University of Illinois make no guarantee,
expressed or implied, regarding the correctness of the interpretations presented in this data
set and accept no liability for the consequences of decisions made by others on the basis of
the information presented here.
2014 University of Illinois Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. For permission
information, contact the Illinois State Geological Survey.
DIRECTORY OF COAL MINES FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS (January 2015)
ISGS
INDEX
COMPANY NAME
MINE NAME
MINE
NO.
MINE
TYPE
METHOD
86
86
CENTRALIA COAL CO.

PEABODY COAL CO.
CENTRALIA
PEABODY
5
21
SHAFT
SHAFT
205
205
MEEKS (T.M.)
EGYPTIAN COAL CO.
MEEK
MEEK
208
208
208
208
208
CRYSTAL COAL CO.

BESSEMER WASHED COAL CO.
BESSEMER COAL & MINING CO.
TILDEN COAL CO.
MADISON COAL CORP.
CRYSTAL
CRYSTAL
CRYSTAL
CRYSTAL
CRYSTAL
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
HORTMAN (CHARLES)
HORTMAN & YOCK
NASHVILLE COAL CO.
MORRIS (JOSEPH)
CAMMAN & MORRIS BROTHERS
MURRAY (HUGH)
MURRAY (ALEXANDER)
MURRAY (HUGH)
GALLATIN COAL & COKE CO.
NICHOLSON COAL CO.
FINKE & HARRIS COAL CO.
NICHOLSON COAL CO.
NASHVILLE MINING CO.
CLARKSON COAL MINING CO.
HORTMAN
HORTMAN & YOCK
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
CAMMAN & MORRIS
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLE
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
BROWN (G. W.)

DU BOIS COAL CO.
BROWN (G. W.)
DU BOIS COAL CO.
KUHN & SCHWIND
SCHWIND (J. D.)
KUHN & SCHWIND
KUHN (ADAM)
KUHN COLLIERY CO.
BROWN
DU BOIS
BROWN
DU BOIS
KUHN & SCHWIND
SCHWIND
KUHN & SCHWIND
DU BOIS
DU BOIS
YEARS
OPERATED
SEAM MINED
COUNTY
MRP
MRP
1908-1947
1947-1948
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
1N 1W
1N 1W
25
25
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
1904-1912
1912-1928
HERRIN
HERRIN
ST. CLAIR
ST. CLAIR
3S 6W
3S 6W
36
36
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
1900-1907
1907-1911
1911-1915
1915-1917
1917-1924
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH
4S
4S
4S
4S
4S
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
5
5
5
5
5
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
1881-1883
1883-1884
1884-1886
1886-1889
1889-1892
1892-1898
1898-1900
1900-1904
1904-1906
1906-1909
1909-1911
1911-1916
1916-1923
1923-1939
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
3W
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
1865-1884
1884-1885
1885-1887
1887-1889
1889-1890
1890-1891
1891-1893
1893-1907
1907-1933
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
3S
3S
3S
3S
3S
3S
3S
3S
3S
1W
1W
1W
1W
1W
1W
1W
1W
1W
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
Page 1 of 3
LOCATION
TWP RGE SEC
ISGS
INDEX
COMPANY NAME
MINE NAME
320
BOIS COAL CO.
KUHN
444
444
CENTRALIA MNG. & MFG. CO.

CENTRALIA COAL CO.
CENTRALIA
SOUTH
637
637
637
637
637
637
637
637
637
637
KIRCHHALFER & KNECHT

LAUMBATTUS (P.)
MARTIN BROTHERS
PFLASTER (GEORGE)
HOOVER (WALTER)
DARMSTADT COAL CO.
JANSEN (AUGUST)
DARMSTADT COAL CO.
SCHNEIDEWIND COAL CO.
DARMSTADT COAL CO.
699
699
699
699
699
MINE
NO.
YEARS
OPERATED
SEAM MINED
COUNTY
MRP
1934-1961
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
3S 1W
33
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
1892-1905
1905-1913
HERRIN
HERRIN
MARION
MARION
1N
1N
1E
1E
19
19
DARMSTADT
DARMSTADT
DARMSTADT
DARMSTADT
DARMSTADT
DARMSTADT
JANSEN
DARMSTADT
SCHNEIDEWIND
DARMSTADT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
1910-1911
1911-1912
1912-1918
1918-1920
1920-1921
1921-1930
1931-1932
1933-1949
1949-1949
1950-1952
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
2S
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
VENEDY COAL CO.

BROCKSMITH (ADOLPH)
VENEDY COAL CO.
BROCKSCHMIDT (A.)
VENEDY COAL CO.
VENEDY
BROCKSMITH
VENEDY
BROCKSCHMIDT
VENEDY
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
1921-1927
1928-1932
1933-1934
1935-1935
1936-1969
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
1S
1S
1S
1S
1S
5W
5W
5W
5W
5W
34
34
34
34
34
952
PEABODY COAL CO.
BALDWIN
SLOPE
BRP
1972-1993
HERRIN
RANDOLPH
4S 6W
990
PEABODY COAL CO.
MARISSA
SLOPE
BRP
1979-1999
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
3S 5W
29
1043
PRAIRIE STATE GENERATING CO.
LIVELY GROVE
SLOPE
RP
2009-
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
3S 5W
2045
2045
ASHLEY COAL CO.

MORRIS BROTHERS
ASHLEY
ASHLEY
SHAFT
SHAFT
RP
RP
1885-1888
1889-1890
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
2S 1W
2S 1W
27
27
UNKNOWN
WASHINGTON
2S 5W
25
2
2
MINE
TYPE
METHOD
SHAFT
3152
3185
3185
3185
3185
EUREKA COAL CO.

JONES BROTHERS COAL & MNG.
OREGON COAL CO.
RANDOLPH COAL CO.
EUREKA
EUREKA
EUREKA
EUREKA
3913
OKAWVILLE COAL CO.
OKAWVILLE
2
2
2
2
LOCATION
TWP RGE SEC
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
MRP
MRP
MRP
MRP
1904-1905
1905-1936
1937-1942
1943-1948
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH
4S
4S
4S
4S
5W
5W
5W
5W
6
6
6
6
SHAFT
RPB
1884-1885
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
1S 4W
21
Page 2 of 3
ISGS
INDEX
COMPANY NAME
MINE NAME
3913
3913
3913
3913
3913
3913
3913
WHITE SMOKE COAL CO.

STRICKER (F. W.)
GRATENDICK & LUNTE
WHITE SMOKE COAL CO.
WAITLAND (H.) & CO.
PADGETT (BEN)
OKAWVILLE COAL CO.
3914
3914
3914
BIERMAN & ARROWSMITH

COMMUNITY COAL CO.
ANDREW (GEORGE)
4249
shaft, no coal found
MINE
NO.
MINE
TYPE
METHOD
YEARS
OPERATED
SEAM MINED
COUNTY
WHITE SMOKE
STRICKER
WHITE SMOKE
WHITE SMOKE
WAITLAND
PADGETT
OKAWVILLE
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
BIERMAN & ARROWSMITH

COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY
SHAFT
SHAFT
SHAFT
RPB
RPB
RPB
RPB
RPB
RPB
RPB
1885-1889
1889-1892
1892-1893
1893-1900
1900-1901
1901-1902
1902-1906
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
1S
1S
1S
1S
1S
1S
1S
4W
4W
4W
4W
4W
4W
4W
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
MRP
MRP
MRP
1937-1939
1940-1942
1942-1942
HERRIN
HERRIN
HERRIN
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON
1S 4W
1S 4W
1S 4W
28
28
28
WASHINGTON
2S 1W
UG
Page 3 of 3
LOCATION
TWP RGE SEC
Coal Mines and Underground Industrial Mines
26
34
21
25
30
28
11
31
32
33

< 4349
5606
Herrin Coal Depth
4350
4350
<
CLINTON
4343
24
7372

<<<
RD
4345
35
4345
4344
4351 11
7371 4351
JEFFERSON
12
150 210
CLINTON
MARION
Herrin Coal Thickness

CLINTON
MARION
ST.
CLAIR
WASHINGTON
JEFFERSON
Mined Out Areas

Pennsylvanian Extent
PERRY
JEFFERSON
28
Cutler
7378
182
182
LEOPARD
25
CLINTON
14
1012
23
27
26
3128
3
997
932
10
MARION
WASHINGTON
JEFFERSON
13
23
18
24
ROAD
17
19
20
15
16
3S 2W
22
27
26
25
30
29
27
28
127
34
35
36
31
32
3129
35 3129
10
4S 3W
21
11
15
22
AR
28
RO
32
O
RN
33
IN
13
18
24
36
19
30
3123
26
34
25
35
17
19
10
154
5S 3W
20
21
28
31
32
33
1016
873
15
14
3120
3120
19
24
634
22
Pinckneyville
634
90 23
27
90
7341 24
3121
3121
297
297
26
25
36
34
623
35
3136
10
11
100 to 200 ft
23
24
29
28
27
26
25
15
21
29
32
31
700 to 800 ft
Du Bois
33
18
17
7340
7336 19
7344
7347
25 4412
4412
10
16
15
5S 2W
20
21
PARROT
864
22
29
28
27
19
175
175
21
29
716
4416
4416
32
31
716
22
28
27
36
31
32
3113
34
24
3175
1
12
3167

<6
3167
13
5
CUD
622
4
G ET
OW N
25
33
34
1300 to 1400 ft
MARION
ST.
CLAIR
10
11
Coal mine - active

Underground coal mine - abandoned
Colchester Thickness
Insufficient data
<28 inches
Surface coal mine - abandoned

Indefinite underground coal mine
boundary - abandoned
>66 inches
JEFFERSON
3166
3166
Channel
Split Coal
Underground Mine
Underground industrial mine and

surrounding buffer region
Surface Mine
951, 951
3106
31068
18
19
17
3107
30
20
3107
178
3108
3108 29
Uncertain location
Active surface tipple

Abandoned surface tipple
Active shaft
Abandoned shaft
Active slope
Abandoned slope

<
Active drift

<
Abandoned drift
# Underground industrial mine
entrance or general location
Coal mine index number (polygon label, point label)
HOOTS CHAPEL RD.
MARSHALL CREEK RD.
WEST LINE RD.

RACE TRACK RD.
SELMAVILLE RD
BELL CLUB RD.
BURGE RD.
18
17
19
20
30
29
31
11
22
23
24
N DUTCH LN
N COPPLE LN
28
27
26
25
30
29
32
33
34
35
36
31
32
JEFFERSON
E SEVIDLE RD
10
10
11
12
14
13
18
17
22
23
24
19
20
25
30
29
36
31
32
27
28
29
26
690
34
33
32
E PULLMAN RD
690
35
16
5S 1W
21
15
23
24
19
20
21
26
25
30
28
27
31
12
32
54
10
23
26
RO
28
RS O N
885
14
13
18
17
22
23
24
19
20
27
26
30
29
877
CITY RD
25
877
24
25
36
35
FRANKLIN
12
31
17
17 20
19
20
30
29
31
10
11
36
31
12
20
29
32
16
5S 1E
21
15
4S
32
863
27
18
154 13
154
17
879
50
24
19
20
26
25
879 30
29
879
33
34
35
666
10
23
PEACH ORCHARD RD
863
863
Sesser
14 863
50
22
28
134
134
YUNG RD
29
31 32
17
32
447
EMERSON CITY RD
8
18
15
34
33
AD
13
35
11
12
885
N COUNTY LINE RD
SASSAFRAS ROAD
690
11
10
E FLAGG RD
E
E EM
KIMMEL ROAD
34
E BONNIE RD
4S 1E
29
154
CITY LAKE ROAD
CROCKER RD
14
22
148
Waltonville
E FREEMAN RD
16
3S 2
E DAVIS RD
17
11
D
E SALISBURY R
KIMZEY ROA
D
PIN RD
15
3S 1E
18
E CHO
E PARTISAN RD
13
Woodlawn
E BURBANIO RD
29
31
36
20
21
2S 1E
14
35
19
13
21
ROAD
17
14
20
18
15
19
12
16
16
AD
17
E SALISBURY RD
12
17
11
18
10
30
36
31
E WORLDLY RD
25
32
36
20
35
PRESLEY LN
36
3141
BLUEBIRD ROAD
3111
3110 4877
32
31 3110
36
33
179 179
4881
4389 633
5 4882 3131 4
6
1
Saint
3165
3135
3131
3133
Johns
3135
43973148
3147 3146
4398 923
7
12
8 9

Opening type unknown
ROAD
Lake or river
1200 to 1300 ft
178
ROAD
35
30
E TAMAROA ROAD
Tamaroa
4417
4417
15
3111
4414 33
N ASHLAND LN
N DOPPLER LN
25
24
CORGAN
4S 1W
20
30
13
26
E HOUSTON RD
19
13
35
10
PINTAIL ROAD
23
COCONUT
30
12
14
32
PLEASANT RD
3086
18
12
26
16
W CORGAN ROAD
36
11
31
N BOYD LN
34
33
32
NORTH DAKOTA ROAD
34
17
18
25
29
12
N STEEL LN
31
2800
23
27
24
35
(Available on Website)
42 to 66 inches
PERRY
CK
26
34
Quadrangle study
800 to 900 ft
28 to 42 inches
WASHINGTON
RO
20
30
E GRAND RD
STICK LN
30
14
22
28
13
AM
23
27
Section
600 to 700 ft
1100 to 1200 ft
Colchester Coal Thickness
11
N. FAIRDRIVE LN
INDIANA ROAD
11
320 320
12
14
Township
200 to 300 ft
1400 to 1500 ft
RANDOLPH
County
500 to 600 ft
CLINTON
11
ROAD
400 to 500 ft
PERRY
ODIN RD.
22
1S 1E
N POST OAK LN
21
19
10
3S 1W
20
30
SH
127
Colchester Depth
JEFFERSON
FARTHING RD.
20
24
24
35
Radom
FALCON ROAD
15
MARION
FARTHING RD.
13
SOUTH DAKOTA ROAD
22
33
1000 to 1100 ft
Channel
16
28
32
GALUM CHURCH ROAD
SEVEN HILLS RD.
NORTON RD.
14
E DOOLITTLE RD
26
FARMERS MARKET ROAD
21
29
31
3118 13 177
3118 774
7336
3115
3136
SCHWARTZ RD.
CREEK RD
NORTON RD.
15
E HIGH LINE RD
34
16
POSEN ROAD
MOUNTAIN LION ROAD
1016
<
WOODS LN.
PERRINE ST.
16
18
13
23
17
18
ROAD
12
900 to 1000 ft
>66 inches
10
4S 2W
20
30
11
TIGER ROAD
29
17
13
N WHITE SWAN LN
14
27
2045 2045
36
PERRY
16
17
Walnut Hill
10
12
51
33
CANARY ROAD
3123
12
WASHINGTON
Insufficient data
17
ROAD
ST.
CLAIR
RANDOLPH
AD
24
7376
18
13
NA
TI
23
27
12
14
5
S MILL ROAD
MUELLER HILL ROAD
3130
3130
TODD
16
36
E DUBOIS RD
35
15
32
13
35
34
33
ELM
ST
JOLLIFF BRIDGE
ROAD
IRVINGTON
11
22
28
NORTH CAROLINA ROAD
26
34
21
CH
23
25
15
2S 1W
29
POSEN RD
21
26
12
64
10
16
20
31
12
14
27
N KRUPP LN
LIPPERT RD
SWEETGUM RD
ASH ROAD
IE
W
RO
AD
17
30
11
19
N PANZIER LN
10
24
N GAELIC LN
23
N TOMAHAWK LN
22
Ashley
36
18
36
SCHOOL ROAD
33
32
NEVADA ROAD
13
25
35
Richview
SUGAR CREEK ROAD
35
34
14
E. BASELINE RD.
HOWARD
33
28
CH 23
32
NU
RD
.
31
HAWAII ROAD
19
25
26
27
W
AL
29
N BALDRIDGE LN
ASH ROAD
36
15
COPPLE RD.
30
Irvington
RI
CH
V
PEAR ORCHARD ROAD
28
20
Wamac
86
25
26
34
18
BEAUCOUP TWP RD
24
23
22
MERIDIAN RD.
POPE RD.
HAHN RD
LADUE RD
SHATTUC RD
BOULDER RD
END RD
SHATTUC RD
HUGHES RD
HUEY RD
FERRIN RD
PEACH TREE ROAD
CHERRY ROAD
MERIDIAN ROAD
13
NORTH CAROLINA ROAD
14
22
29
12
Split Coal
PERRY
33
KENTUCKY ROAD
12
300 to 400 ft
Surface Mine
42 to 66 inches
27
RADOM ROAD
11
15
33
20
CLINTON
Underground Mine
28 to 42 inches
FAS 788
RD
DRIVE
HOGSHEAD
ELM ROAD
ASPEN ROAD
CRE
21
29
31
0 to 100 ft
700 to 800 ft
<28 inches
28
32
12
14
15
2S 2W
20
30
36
10
28
17
31
Colchester Coal Depth
200 to 300 ft
Faults
HOFFMAN RD
PELICAN RD
RAKERS RD
COON BRANCH ROAD
COVINGTON RD
S T OAK RD
PO
25
35
21
30
36
25
11
100 to 200 ft
600 to 700 ft
SHATTUC ROAD
HOPEWELL RD
H
SO U T
KR
OA
D
LAKE RD
19
4342
Springfield Depth
1200 to 1300 ft
ST.
CLAIR
RANDOLPH
16
CANNA ROAD
3180
ROAD
23
EK ROAD
11
34 3127
3126 3125 3127
3180
9999 4
1100 to 1200 ft
PERRY
Springfield Coal Thickness
Channel
17
CONNECTICUT ROAD
3S 3W
19
1300 to 1400 ft
>66 inches
BRINKMAN RD
PIPELINE RD
LITTLE PRAIRIE
24
1000 to 1100 ft
RANDOLPH
FISHER RD
ST ROSE RD
RD
EL
FROGTOWN RD
VA
R
TWIN LEVEL RD
TONY RD
26
34
16
32
18
900 to 1000 ft
Split Coal
RANDOLPH
ISO
RR
HA
29
800 to 900 ft
Insufficient data
42 to 66 inches
1036
500 to 600 ft
WASHINGTON
Surface Mine
28 to 42 inches
27
OAK RIDG
E ROAD
22
33
400 to 500 ft
ST.
CLAIR
Underground Mine
<28 inches
CORDES RD
20
300 to 400 ft
1200 to 1300 ft
Faults
28
17
31
0 to 100 ft
900 to 1000 ft
1100 to 1200 ft
21
3124
32
3181
3181
Springfield Coal Depth
600 to 700 ft
1000 to 1100 ft
24
700 to 800 ft
PERRY
150
29

<<<
4421 4421
800 to 900 ft
RANDOLPH
5S 4W
22
29
31
11
OAKDALE BLACKTOP RD
JACKRABBIT ROAD
31
4344
Percy
30
12
717
1045
10
23
717
13
35
15
3124
Prairie Eagle Underground South Mine
200 to 300 ft
500 to 600 ft
26
10
16
20
30
36
100 to 200 ft
400 to 500 ft
WASHINGTON
17
1041
19
13
23
Prairie Eagle Mine
300 to 400 ft
ST.
CLAIR
19
25
4343
18
226
SAWMILL ROAD
14
34
1051
26
Herrin Depth
MARION
11
15
27
33
18
7377 3200
34
18
ROSE OF SHARON ROAD
0 to 100 ft
Miles
32
13
BLACKSTUMP ROAD
4349
12
TULIP ROAD
872
RANDOLPH
6
3201
5609 27

<
CRYSTAL SPRINGS RD
36
12
Blackhawk Mine
ROSEBOROUGH RD
5599
29
Gateway Mine
13
36
22
28
30
36
10
Nashville
22
33
25
HOLLYHOCK ROAD
14
3197
13
SOUTH GRAND ROAD
32
PLEASANT HILL ROAD
Swanwick
21
29
31
23
OA
19
444
MINE 21 RD
MARKET ST
Hawkeye Mine
BLAIR RD
10
20
1049
35
19
20
24
1N 1E
CALUMET
12
11
36
1 136
148
136
879
56
PARK STREET RD
12
Map Explanation
This map accompanies the coal mines directory for this county. Please consult the directory for an
explanation of the coal mine information shown on this map. Buffer regions for industrial mineral mines
were incorporated into this map due to limited information regarding these mines. The size of the buffer
region is dependent on the uncertainty or inaccuracy of the mine location. For more information
regarding industrial mineral mines please contact the ISGS Industrial Minerals Section.
The maps and digital files used for this study were compiled from data obtained from a variety of
public and private sources and have varying degrees of completeness and accuracy. They present
reasonable interpretations of the geology of the area and are based on available data. These data
were compiled and digitized at a scale of 1:62,500. Locations of some features may be offset by
500 feet or more due to errors in the original source maps, the compilation process, digitizing,
or a combination of these factors.
These data are not intended for use in site-specific screening or decision-making. Data included in
this map are suitable for use at a scale of 1:100,000.
Disclaimer
The Illinois State Geological Survey and the University of Illinois make no guarantee, expressed or
implied, regarding the correctness of the interpretations presented in this data set and accept no
liability for the consequences of decisions made by others on the basis of the information presented here.
2013 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. All rights reserved.
5S
32
31
LINCOLN RD
5620
24
3199
4357
22
L AN
HR
2845
444
11
KATHERINE ST
5S 5W
HOLLOWAY ROAD
12
17
PERRY CO LINE ROAD
10
4S 4W
CREEK ROAD
11
15
C
UR
CH
24
154
16
ZION CHURCH RD
17
36
10
31
12
26
16
25
35
18
2845
GRAGG
EAST CENTER RD
23
EXCHANGE RD
209
17
30
968
MOFFATT RD
1:100,000
33
838
25
3193
3183
3183
35
34
13
EN ST. RD.
BEAR POINT RD
22
4361
337
153
34
209
18
13
33
946
27 4375

<
3220
3219
28
300
SCHULINE RD
SWENKE RD
26
3105 19
WILLY RD
153
24
968
AD
14
930
83
BOTTOM ROAD
HOUSTON RD
EVERGREEN LANE
12
32
7543
11
29
6 154
300
12
3217
RD
MENKE RD
WALSH ROAD
31
15
ORCHARD RD
30
27
11
127
PICK
21
EGGEMEYER
36
11
WRIGHT RD
28
32
9
GOLDENROD ROAD
3186 176
18
13
23
MARY'S
NATURE TRAIL RD
3208
5S 6W
31
613
3204
10
930
36
3192
3192
3202 3206
613
3203
3202
2
3205 1 Sparta
630
20
3223 3222
3223
3222
25
ZION CHURCH RD
RD
KA
HL
E
KAHLE RD
24
26
35
19
35
21
2844
2843
7
12
GR E
RD
BANISTER
23
701
16
MARION
157
3214
3214
29
AD
10
14
NEBRASKA ROAD
35
Central
City
2843
GLADSON
3209
701
3210
7544
16
30
176
22
29
AD
23
34
4249
VE
HA
17
21
2S 3W
OD
7545
20
14
15
AD
3213
3189 34
3189
4372
4372
25
3186
14
SARAH RD
30
14
27
33
26
226
21
RO
4368
18
13
33
26
27
4369 4370 4370

8
9
4367
4S 5W
20
4378
4378
4380
4367
19
15
16
10
16
3144
OR
6091
12
6091
24
17
RO
16
28
32
12
Coulterville
ZIEGLER MINE RD
28
18
29
31
11
KELLY RD
13
23
22
17
19
36
Oakdale
22
GL
14
32
FIELD RD
RD
LESSLEY
PEARIDGE RD
29
RD
21
154
31
PRAIRIE
654 10
WO
RID
GE
20
30
36
4S 6W
14
36
21
87
HARVEST RD
ROAD
25
15
CEMETRY
19
16
WOODCOCK RD
FALLVIEW RD
24
26
17
HILL
18
30
654
20
32
2N 1E
N RIDGE LN
952
COUNTY ROAD 18
3S 4W
31
N SCHELLER LN
12
15
25
11
15
36
MULKEYTOWN RD
11
35
13
25
CH 10
35
N LODGE LN
10
34
208
NORTON LANE
19
16
34
INGO
LN
952
24
17
33
31
F L AM
3185
3184
Tilden
6
5
208
13
18
13
26
3185
33
BLACKSTUMP
HOFFMANN RD
952
DOZA CREEK RD
CHERIDAN ROAD
32
10
33
LE
14
205
RANDOLPH CO LINE RD
31
WASHINGTON
AD
EL KT
ON R
O
MIDD
15
207
207
THOMPSON ROAD
36
RO
32
31
36
17
16
32
Junction City
36
EAGLE ROAD
3621
205
36273625
35
LOCUST CREEK ROAD
23
27
27
18
17 2847
87
29
15
21
13
Odin
30
16
20
25
11
MOCKINGBIRD ROAD
18
24
35
ADAMS
19
26
10
1S 1W
12
27
FAS 819
11
28
35
28
28
29
30
25
10
29
17
30
RADOM ROAD
34
18
25
PIPE
33
13
3621
29 990
SCHUPB
ACH
RO
32
30
EDEN ROAD
31
793
793
25
34
26
SAN
D
3622
26
13
26
T
GRAN
MARISSA ROAD
990
80
10
12
14
22
H AH
33
20
35
COLLIER CREEK ROAD
21
14
27
34
HITT ROAD
3624 80
27
7386
7386
15
3S 5W
20
19
CH
153
16
12
23
33
32
19
26
MARLOW ROAD
Marissa
24
32
32
Sandoval
206
86
ROBIN ROAD
28
23
17
18
10
Lively
Grove11
Mine
1043
31
31
31
24
23
27
ROBIN ROAD
29
30
22
3619
36
34
33
28
TONTI RD.
BOONE ST RD.
29
23
WEST 10TH ST
22
30
36
35
34
TICKLEN RD.
22
WILKIN RD
29
25
20
21
14
1N 1W
21
26
19
20
11
SASSAFRAS RD
24
27
24
19
15
MAPLE ROAD
26
LUNTE CREEK ROAD
22
28
23
28
23
17
24
35
10
BLUE JAY ROAD
21
13
21
29
3620
20
MARIGOLD ROAD
CORNFLOWER ROAD
3S 6W
14
1043
9
TILDEN RD
856
15
16
12
30
TAFT ROAD
35
TILDEN RD
856
17
11
10
20
ROAD
13
3620 3624
12
6
WASHINGTON CO LINE
25
11
15
2S 4W
20
30
177
22
18
23
CH 1
10
16
32
Addieville
17
19
31
160
22
13
Hoyleton
21
18
SKI ROAD
RD
LENZBRG
O LD
26
34
33
36
34
QUARRY ROAD
32
31
35
CH 6
DARMSTADT ROAD
DARMSTADT ROAD
36
34
3152
27
28
29
30
637
637
35
33
18
24
21
20
14
SCHOOL ROAD
27
28
RD
FERRYDALE RD.
13
SYCAMORE RD
TOWNSHIP LINE ROAD
25
LENZBURG RD
19
36
23
21
23
29
15
1S 2W
MALLARD ROAD
STONE CHURCH ROAD
22
30
12
3N 1E
51
JUNCTION RD
19
PARAKEET ROAD
34
RISDON SCH RD
Baldwin
2S 5W
13
25
14
27
16
26
26
11
PANTHER CREEK ROAD
934
18
25
13
20
27
10
SWAN ROAD
33
14
AD
14
LIBERTY
16
17
19
GO
17
LOCUST ROAD
New
Minden
24
23
22
21
VALIER CARPET ROAD
27
20
32
24
11
RO
15
GOLDENROD
28
12
ROAD
31
16
CH 12
29
HILLSTOWN RD
UI
19
DARMSTADT RD
13
35
LO
17
HUNTER FIELD RD
LENZBURG ROAD
30
26
ST
15
SUNFLOWER ROAD
794
23
11
19
36
HICKORY CREEK ROAD
24
LD
3914
32
24
25
GROSBECK ROAD
23
18
23
18
13
14
1S 3W
12
11
CARDINAL ROAD
28
15
4338
4338
22
BLUEBIRD ROAD
15
16
26 25
13
RANGE RD.
12
161
19
25
14
SANDOVAL RD
SYCAMORE RD
ROAD
22
10
17
24
35
34
33
18
24
15
33
32
206
15
W 10TH ST RD
26
CR
OS
SB
ILL
21
18 177
10
27 26
23 26
27
BLUE BUNTING ROAD
20
13
35
29
31
36
3914
28
32
31
36
35
23
22 22
29
30
TOWN HALL ROAD
2S 6W
14
Venedy
ROAD
30
25
21
127
NOTTMEYER RD
22
21
PUFFIN ROAD
15
Saint
Libory
699 34
20
13
34
20
FOSTER RD
13
14
5
HU
Hoffman
16
COMMUNITY BEACH RD.
12
11
29
31
11
22
33
20
30
36
10
28
32
12
BRINK RD
21
29
25
35
SAND RIDGE RD
31
25
26
26 25
35
34 35
27
30 19
21
CH 17
16
699
12
33
19
3913
3913
14
25
19
DOG ALLEY ROAD
28
33
32
26
27
19
30
1N 2W
20
ALABAMA ROAD
11
32
O
SP
Okawville
32
5
12
28
18
24
23
22
33
11
15
1S 4W
1N 3W
21
29
31
10
16
30
36
20
13
14
15
CH 17
17
19
36
14
31
26
27
28
30
36
15
16
17
OKLAHOMA ROAD
10
29
17
19
25
35
18
24
25
35
10
PICK ROAD
MUD CR. RD.
15
MARISSA NO
3628
11
4337
4337
794 4309
4309 Lenzburg
792 7
12
792
3628
RD
13
160
23
22
21
20
14
15
16
20
21
20
30
36
26
34
33
3 3 34
HERON ROAD
30
25
35
1S 5W
17
24
16
PIONEER RD
26
2N 1W
20
17
19
WORTMAN RD
16
HAMMEL RD
AD
LAKE RO
79535
650
650
308
2
ER
T
18
25
3617
24
26
MM
17
RD
17
27
COLLEGE RD
POSEN
HU
34
Fayetteville
13
23
20
RD
18
13
23
34
12
33
26
19
24
11
LN
15
27
4
5
11
PURPLE MARTIN ROAD
32
12
14
19
24
CA
14
18
IS
10
IEW
HV
11
N
CA
12
50
RR
.
RD
FAIRMAN RD.
17
13
23
34
C
N RI
31
28
14
27
33
GEBKE RD
10
Bartelso
22
28
C AR N
ATION
ROAD
29
DRUM HILL RD
23
PENSONEAU ROAD
30
36
22
18
CH 12
21
13
19
AD
25
1S 6W
14
31 31 32
6
11
11
15
16
WILD TURKEY RD
20
15
12
WESSELMAN ROAD
18
24
26
34
33
LOWE
HINTZ RD
7
GE
14
22
33
12
BRICKYARD RO
857
PLSNT RIDGE SCHOOL
JEFFERSON RD
19
24
16
VENEDY RD
23
11
10
COWBIRD RD
JACK'S RUN RD
35
177
PRIMROSE RD
17
SCH. RD.
18
13
21
HICKCAN ROAD
BIG
14
11
15
1N 4W
32
AD
12
28
13
23
27
28
32
Huey
22
21
29
31
36
14
15
16
20
30
25
35
R
O
31
23
MISTY ROAD
11
16
29
CH 27
10
30
36
AN
21
32
12
11
10
2N 2W
19
24
26
34
GARFIELD ROAD
10
161
20
CROCUS ROAD
LIE
940
35
34
33
32
22
OIL FIELD RD
CH 13
12
AIRPORT RD
31
Carlyle
2043
33
CIRCLE ROAD
BRICKYARD ROAD
11
36
32
ELKENDIER SCHOOL RD
35
25
85
27
28
LINCOLN ROAD
34
27
CH 4
RD
26
85
21
29
332
17
19
Damiansville
28
29
30
177
DAMIANSVILLE RD
18
24
20
CH 21
CLINTON
31
17
18
13
14
CH 21
REISS
25
332
FOXGLOVE ROAD
26
340
19
23
22
21
20
160
27
33
24
FUESSER RD
340
32
23
974
22
NEW CHURCH ROAD
31
1N 5W
36
35
VOGEL RD
13
19
31
PANDA BEAR ROAD
36
84
14
15
16
17
Beckemeyer
15
3N 1W
29
11
LL
HI

Mascoutah 3485
64
28
3486
84
18
2N 3W
16
16
20
30
10
WIEDLE RD
127
15
SL
HALFACRE ROAD
3486
13
19
25
26
34
33
12
11
10
17
30
36
POLK ROAD
29
14
35
ROAD
21
Albers
24
23
27
28
OLD CARLYLE RD
GERANIUM
30
177 4383
3491
20
12
25
LL
25
35
3491
ST.
CLAIR
19
COUNTY RD
26
1N 6W
34
Germantown
11
HIGHLINE RD
33
COURT RD
10
26
WESCLIN RD
New Baden
161
15
27
17
COUNTY FARM RD
18
24
199
WINKLE ROAD
24
RD
12
32
VI
23
16
11
13
23
SWANWICK
161
31
RD
199
198
22
BLUE JAY ROAD
17
10
36
974
PFEIFFER RD
35
34
33
32
31
CH
18
28
ST
AT
E
22
21
32
31
36
35
18
COLES CREEK RD
34
OLD U.S. HIGHWAY 50
Breese
TIGERLILY ROAD
13
36
SAND HILL RD
14
EMIG RD
12
29
WEAVER CREEK
PERRIN R
11
CLINTON CO LINE RD.
35
LIEBIG SCH. RD.
34
LUETTINGER RD
KORTE
30
14
BREESE RD
HIGH LINE RD
COUNTY LINE RD
FAUST RD
33
SEWALD RD
32
EMIG
31
25
2044
21
12
Boulder
WILLIAM RD
15
2N 4W
20
OL
13
3N 2W
29
30
25
26
14
15
16
20
19
24
23
198
16
2044
19
11
HOLY CROSS LN
17
RD
26
27
28
29
30
TE
STA
10
FLEUR-DE-LIS ROAD
867
867
25
28
27
33
32
31
WASHINGTON ROAD
26
ROCKY FORD
29
30
36
PLUM HILL CHURCH RD
27
25
35
OA
D
REIDER RD
3593
331
331
22
WRINGE
RD
WILSON R
3593
28
2047
34
18
23 Aviston 24
22
21
13
14
15
26
ROAD
29
2047
BOTTOM PRAIRIE ROAD
36
35
4313
4313
20
12
OL D
2N 5W
Trenton
19
24
16
17
18
13
23
OLD U.S. 50
160
OAK GROVE SCHOOL RD
35
26
22
OTTER RD
11
10
27
33
NA
SH
21
14
GRASSY BRANCH
2N 6W
15
COOLIDGE ROAD
16
Summerfield
3594 4271 4270

3594
200 200
30
25
MIDGLEY-NEISS ROAD
20
Lebanon
12
ROOSEVELT ROAD
19
11
MARYDALE RD
21
CYBERTEL RD
17
18
13
14
15
LEE RD
COUNTY LINE ROAD
17
10
TODD ROAD
28
32
STRIEKER RD
AVISTON RD
18
24
304
304
26
CATTLE PEN ROAD
13
23
CRACKERN ECK RD
12
14
PLEASANT VALLEY SCH
TANK RD
RICHW OOD SC
EMERALD MOUND R
EMERALD MOUND GRANGE
11
O
HO
L RD
TANK RD
OLD TRENTON RD
COUNTY LINE RD
ND RD
RUSSLA
31
3N 3W
20
19
CHARLENE
36
MADISON CO LINE RD
29
WAYNE RD
35
34
33
24
ROSE OF SHARON ROAD
ROSE RD
32
31
23
JAMESTOWN RD
36
22
BLUEBELL ROAD
35
16
17
18
GOODING FORD RD
ROAD
34
13
EMERALD RD
PEEK RD
MCKINLEY ROAD
33
Saint
Rose
WAFFLER RD
RINDERER RD
21
SNAPDRAGON ROAD
32
30
12
11
10
http://www.isgs.illinois.edu
RD
31
25
26
27
28
29
30
MADISON
RD
36
25
CEMETERY RD
14
3N 4W
LARKSPUR ROAD
26
20
PINTAIL ROAD
27
19
SCHWERING SCHOOL RD
LEBANON RD
35
28
CEDAR
29
ZILLES
24
BLACKJACK ROAD
30
23
HOOVER
25
22
21
20
19
15
GERMANTOWN RD
LILAC RD
26
24
16
DRIVE IN RD
23
12
County coal maps and select quadrangle maps available as downloadable PDF files at:
EMERALD DR
ROGIER RD
SPANKER BRANCH
22
17
LAKE BRANCH RD
21
3N 5W
18
IBERG RD
LINDEN GROVE RD
EAST ASTER
13
14
15
16
17
18
COLUMBINE ROAD
20
13
SCHUMAC HER RD
3N 6W
14
RD
15
RINDERER RD
19
16
WALNUT RD
24
17
CHESTNUT RD
RD
18
CYPRESS
BAUER RD
23
Saint
Jacob
ELLIS RD
11
County
Map construction: September 18, 2013
This product is under review and may not meet the

standards of the Illinois State Geological Survey.
MAIN P
AR
10
13
ISGS Coal Section
WASHINGTON
For further information contact:

Prairie Research Institute
Illinois State Geological Survey
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
615 East Peabody Drive
Champaign, Illinois 61820-6964
(217) 333-4747
http://www.isgs.illinois.edu
14
County Coal Map Series
Illinois Department Of Revenue

Property Tax Division
Map Creation Date: 4/28/2016
177
S
T
Clinton
County
Okawville
127
S
T
64
160
S
T
Venedy
GISID: B36 - MAP# 86
Addieville
Johannisburg
15
S
T
Plum
Hill
Stone
Church
Nashville
Washington
County
ST. CLAIR
2016
Kempside
Lively
Grove
CLINTON
Biddleborn
153
S
T
WASHINGTON
RANDOLPH
127
S
T
Cordes
Elkton
PERRY
DISCLAIMER
In preparing these maps, constraints of scale, data, time, and
personnel required the generalization and extrapolation of
boundaries which have not been field-checked. The base
maps used by the Department in this process were obtained
from the University of Illinois (ILLIMAP), and the U.S.
Department of Commerce, and the Bureau of the Census
(TIGER). These maps may not be used to determine any
boundary or the location of monuments, railroads, roads, or
streets, with any precision, because the boundaries and
locations on these maps are ONLY GENERALIZED
REPRESENTATIONS OF APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AND
BOUNDARIES.
The Illinois Department of Revenue and the State of Illinois
hereby give notice to all users that these maps and the data
included hereon, lack the accuracy required for site-specific
uses. Since all boundaries and all data are based on
information derived from sources outside the Illinois
Department of Revenue, the Illinois Department of Revenue
and the State of Illinois make no representation, guarantee or
warranty, either express or implied, regarding the accuracy of
these maps or the data furnished thereon, including, but not
limited to, the condition of this product, this product's
merchantability, or this product's fitness for any particular
Oakdale
3
Miles
Nashville/Washington County (2016)
Greater Centralia Enterprise Zone

2012 Tax Year
Illinois Department Of Revenue

Property Tax Division
CLINTON
MARION
WASHINGTON
JEFFERSON
DISCLAIMER
0.25
0.5
Miles
0.75
In preparing these maps, constraints of scale, data, time, and personnel required the generalization and extrapolation of boundaries
which have not been field-checked. The base maps used by the Department in this process were obtained from the University of Illinois
(ILLIMAP), and the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the Bureau of the Census (TIGER). These maps may not be used to determine
any boundary or the location of monuments, railroads, roads, or streets, with any precision, because the boundaries and locations on
these maps are ONLY GENERALIZED REPRESENTATIONS OF APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS AND BOUNDARIES.
The Illinois Department of Revenue and the State of Illinois hereby give notice to all users that these maps and the data included hereon,
lack the accuracy required for site-specific uses. Since all boundaries and all data are based on information derived from sources outside
the Illinois Department of Revenue, the Illinois Department of Revenue and the State of Illinois make no representation, guarantee or
warranty, either express or implied, regarding the accuracy of these maps or the data furnished thereon, including, but not limited to, the
condition of this product, this product's merchantability, or this product's fitness for any particular purpose or use. Specific questions
regarding boundary locations should be directed to the clerk of the county in which the property exists.
CITY LIMITS, ENTERPRISE ZONE AND TIF MAP

CENTRALIA, ILLINOIS
N
1200
1200
2400
3600
S EC .
33
32
32
CO R .
U
R
IN
G
T
O
N
N
O
R
34
35
CO R .
CO R .
CO R .
MARION COUNTY
CLINTON COUNTY
SCALE IN FEET
34
33
4
S EC .
S EC .
S EC .
31
H
E
N
R
A
IL
O
A
D
JUNCTION
23
23
22
22
14
21
21
13
20
5
6
19
29
16
20
19
15
12
30
18
18
31
17
17
16
16
10
15
10
15
10
11
14
11
14
11
12
13
12
13
12
PEARCY
32
11
10
9
8
2
11
12
STREET
PEARCY
22
10
21
21
21
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
2
3
WEST
17
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 21 22
23 24 25
26
3
4
EI
1
2
5
6
7
5 4
23
13
6 7 8 9
10
22
RI
TT
16
11
12
STREET
EI
24
5
6
20
17
10
11
16
11
15
12
15
12
14
13
14
13
CLINTON COUNTY
IS
10
11
13
LIN
11
FRA
10
9
8
7
G
EI
14
15
17
28
27
NORTON RD
STREET
PO
I
LAKE EARTHE
N DAM
E
K
L
A
OO
GW
56
55
57
53
54
52
51
50
46
47
48
49
DO
T
OU
STREET
43
44
45
RACCOON
STREET
HAMILTON
KNIGHT
ADDITION
ROBNETT DRIVE
15
18
18
T
H 13
17
IG 14
16 HE
15
12
11
15
21
10
11
12
28
15
2
3
4
5
17
1
2
3
14
16
15
6
7
8
16
10
15
10
14
11
14
11
13
12
13
12
11
15
14
TI
DI
AD
17
16
15
14
10
11
13
13
12
12
11
11
10
10
38
12
13
14
PL
28
37
27
10
9
29
36
30
33
34
32
5
6
7
21
15
16
17
18 19
9
3
10
17
14
4
5
13
16
11
6
12
15
14
10
9
8
7
11
12
2
3
18
22
7
8
9
GE
38
37
36
EDGEBROOK NORTH
NO. 4
LN
29 30
24
31
32
FLOWAGE
8
33
34
35
21
19
22
EAST SUBDIVISION
LANE
NO. 2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
14
18
51
23
24
25
49
48
28
17
16
15
CENTRALIA
15
47
46
45
DEVONIA
29
11
3
50
MANOR
14
30
31
27
16
13
EAST
13
32
33
44
43
42
41
DRIVE
34
26
25
17
18
12
11
35
37
24
23
19
20
10
22
6
7
15
16
CASSNA
1
5
18
19
20
21
IV
30
30
29
29
28
28
27
26
6
7
14
15
16
18
17
20
EVERGREEN
DRIVE
10
11
12
13 14 15
16
12
11
19
3
4
2
5
17 18
19
20
10
85
86
87
88
89
90
32
33
25
10
11
24
21
26
25
23
22
8
9
10
20
27
5
6
11
24
23
22
21
24
23
76
73
22
77
70
7
8
20
9
10
1
7
8
9
11
10
12
19
12
19
13
18
13
18
13
17
14
17
14
14
15
16
15
16
21
10
10
21
20
19
18
8
17
75
30
40
12
13
11
12
13
34
35
36 37
39
78
79
66
67
10
80
65
64
81
11
82
69
91
11
12
14
92
43
84
13
22
62
63
46
23
BD
SU
60
59
57
56
49
54
55
50
105
16
51
IO
IV
1
2
3
14
16
10
15
14
13
20
11
41
40
11
12
10
9
RK
PA
93
12
37
15
14
13
11
STATE ROUTE 161 (McCORD STREET)
#2
LANE
#9
#7
100
CALUMET STREET
102
STREET
S EC .
16
15
PATRIOT
S EC .
ROAD
ROAD
21
15
14
22
23
22
C O R .
CO R .
10
1.92 AC|
TRACT "F"
1.92 AC|
TRACT "B"
2.57 AC|
10
11
16
15
13
14
14
13
12
6
11
12
11
13
10
15
16
17
18
19
DRIVE
1
13
12
#4
#6
12
WINCHESTER
20
12
21
34
33
11
10
22
23
11
10
32
24
BAYBERRY DRIVE
31
SOUTHERN
36
D.
CENTRALIA
94
13
35
SU6B
SCHOOL
TRACT "C"
10
IO
IVIS
WS
1
DO
3 MEA2
BENNINGTON COURT
39
3
2
TRACT "E"
17
50
12
DEN
21
53
52
10
PIC
CHURCH
17 16
ST
13
101
STREET
12
S EC .
DRIVE
D R IVE
AR
DRIVE
11
DRIVE
SUBDIVISION
9
SU
CO R .
C H
A R D
20
99
51
SUB
21
19
98
5
4
10
38
22
18
BD
PINE
14
G
DRIVE
S
BONANZA
AGAPE
IS
103
10
54
2
5
23
11
R
AZIE
24
17
96
104
14
12
52
53
19
15
47
48
18
25
16
IO
IS
97
17
13
61
58
44
15
20
18
ORCHARD DRIVE
15
12
26
SKYVIEW
#8
44
45
95
38
107
21
83
13
O
BR
68
24
EAST SUBDIVISION
DRIVE
31
27
25
PLACE
17
ILLINOIS ROUTE 161
28
N
E26
41
V
A
H42
10
11
12
13
72
71
12
16
15
11
15
74
12
43
FR
14
AVENUE
29
8
11 10
FRAZIER
13
ER
46
27
12
AIRPORT
EVERGREEN
28
11
JORDAN
DRIVE
18
11
10
STREET
SIXTH
12
29
SABLE
SU
12
13
ORCHAR
30
10
1
22
45
32
SUNNYSIDE DRIVE
DRIVE
40
I
IS
IV
D 17
B16
15
14
13
11
20
21
22
23
24
25
10
161
31
17
ROUTE
14
K/C
CRISP
CENTER
16
KRISTY
MARQUIS AVENUE
19
1
4
11
FLOWAGE
EASEMENT
21
DRIVE
LANE
15
DRIVE
3
39
32
31
FLOWAGE
EASEMENT
38
ACRES SUBDIVISION
3
40
39
36
10
11
TRACY
30
EDGEBROOK 20
23
EASEMENT
6
5
LN
28
25
AIRPORT
DRIVE
16
11
U
M
LANE
39
R
EW
26
40
WOODS
FAIRWAY DRIVE
41
10
1.79 AC|
DRIVE
29
28
26
1
18
PO
SS
10
1.79 AC|
BRIARWOOD
15
11
OUT
MOONGLOW RD
20
19
21
DRIVE
21
SUBDIVISION
20
BEL-AIR
19
22
BEL-AIR
RUN
SUBDIVISION
18
DALE NOLEMAN
13
14
14
ROAD
TRACT "D"
DRIVE
11
12
15
IO
N
OAKDALE
19
16
11
FI
NORTH
LANE
OO
BLACKBERRY
17
DRIVE
10
13
13
SUBDIVISION
20
18
17
15
19
D
3
GLENDA AVENUE
12
11
10
OAKDALE
SU
14
27
38
33
HI
6
7
10
14
13
GAYLA AVENUE
2
18
OSAGE
12
37
34
ND
LA
GH
10
MANOR
36
SUBDIVISION
7
7
k
e
EDGEWOOD
TERRACE
4
1
16
20
17
15
24
23
22
19
PL
D31
35
26
CE25
LANE
BD
17
15
SUBDIVISION
20
SUBDIVISION
10
IO
IS 9
IV10
22
DRIVE
PIPER DRIVE
DRIVE
16
SPRUCE
20
19
18
17
16
17
21
18
1
ON
ARLINE DRIVE
DAVIS
2
3
18
ARLINE DRIVE
23
22
21
18
BROOK
11
12
K
13
GREVE
13
12
5SOUTH
10
CRESTWOOD MEADOWS
10
SUBDIVISION
1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
PLEASANT
6
7
24
15
3 2 1
AREA
MAGNOLIA
ISIO
DIV
11 10
AERO
23
SUB
26
25
46
12
7
ROAD
24
FY
14
27
RIDGE
10
12
11
SUBDIVISION
14
23
22
HOLIDAY
11
17
6
5
4
ACRES
12
12
13
HOLIDAY
6 7 8 9 10
11
19
18
RONNIES TERRACE
15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
SUBDIVISION
H
T13
9
16
23
DRIVE
6 5 4 3 2 1
24
16
42
FRAZIER
21
MOONGLOW RD
PHYLLIS DRIVE
LACKEY LANE
12
25
LANE
30
29
28
27
26
JOHN CARTER
1
DANN
DRIVE
SUBDIVISION
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19
9
6
10
18
7
25
19
24
20
22
11
EAST SUBDIVISION
26
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
10
SUBDIVISION
JONES
LANE
6 5 4 3 2 1
.2
MARQUIS
14
6T
H
A
OUT DD
IT
13 E C
16
15
24
16 17 18 19 20
7 8 9 10 11 12
JONES STREET
25
14
14
11
16
43
10
7 8 9 10 11 12
AVENUE
3 2
ANDERSON
20
19
17
10
38
GLENWOOD ACRES
PA
8 9 10
5 4
2
3
LA
16
S EC .
2
9
12
12
BD
SU
26
STREET
O
N
EDGEBROOK
43
NO. 1
12
11
SOU
IV
45
13
19
18
15
PARK LANE
O
TI
22
15
K
17
AVENUE
7
ROAD
10
8 9 10
21
RY S5
11
O
K OW
IC 10
D
H
16 EA
9
M
11
DRIVE
18
17
WA
JAYCEES
CHURCH
47
16
11
37
10
55
13
O
SI
44
CHURCH
12
10
SOUTH
CENTRAL
TRANSIT
LINCOLN
19
5
OUT
ROAD SUBDIVISION
13
42
49
12
36
DRIVE
15 14 13 12 11
AVENUE
18
(EVERS FIELD)
11
10
16
14
11
54
SUBDIVISION
CRESTWOOD
6 5 4 3 2 1
2 RKINS
ATHLETIC
10
14
13
12
18
53
18
19
19
10
STATE ROUTE 161 (McCORD STREET)
6 5 4 3 2 1
3ADDI 4NO
17
6 5 4 3 2 1
C.H.S.
FOURTEENTH
17
52
PENTA
10
21
11
PARK
AVENUE
13
20
26
15
16
ED
DRIVE
VIEW
22
STREET
4 3 2
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
AVENUE
19
18
19
17
9
10
51
EDGEBROOK
BLACKBERRY RUN
AVENUE
PLEASANT
31
REDWOOD DRIVE
4 3 2
RN
CE11
14
24
27
CE
PLA
50
COUNTRY CLUB
40
ESTATE
9 10
11 12
32
PARK
CHILDRENS HOME
HUDELSON BAPTIST
SUBDIVISION
PERRINE
I.M. ROBINETTS
NO. 2
SUBDIVISION
CENTRALIA
AVENUE
DAVIS
AVENUE
WATSON LN
SANDERS
SUBDIVISION
NO. 1
AVENUE
PARKSIDE
SUBDIVISION
NO. 2
SANDERS
4
5
23
20
OLN
13
TRENTON
LANE
HOU
CLUB
DURIAN DRIVE
U.S. ARMY RESERVE
SE R
D.
WRIGHT
FOUNDATION
BOULEVARD
TRAINING CENTER
MEYER
34
CORONADO
25
LACKEY LN
VALLEY
VILLAGE
PARK
FRANKLIN
DRIVE
ON
8 9 10
BU
12
8
9
10
18 17
22
3
6
DRIVE
AVENUE
JACKSON
AD
13
14
16
11
12
17
16
15
CLEAR LAKE
DRIVE
AVENUE
SUBDIVISION
AVENUE
ET
STRE
COUNTY
CLERKS
9
LEAFLAND
STRE
ET
11 10
12
4
C
IN3
14
20
12
11
10
PL
16
1
2
FAIRVIEW
LINCOLN
NORTH
AVENUE
BOULEVARD
DI
TI
ON
RTH
17
15
7
8
9
10
7
4
12
29
16
13
14
EE
T
2
3
15
SUBD.
10
PLACE
TS
McKEE
TO
RTH
NO
E12
32
30
29
14
IV
31
41
42
13
ST
R
18
17
16
24
23
22
21
20
19
16
13
8
9
10
11
12
2
30
23
22
21
20
19
ET
15
17
21
34
33
19
15
14
FI
13
FT
12
EE
11
N
10
TH
31
TE
18
AD
FOURTH
16
14
17
20 19
38
20
17
16
13
16
15
E
L 35
18L
49
LANE
YOOS
LYNONS
McCANCES
RI
V
D
W
ER
STREET
ET
STRE
16
18
6 5 4 3 2
17
ST
33
STREET
LOCUST
RTH
NO
ST
RE
ET
K
OA
RT
H
NO
EA
3 2 1
IR
C 37
19
RE
7
8
NO
N
O
.2
STRE
ET
UT
.1
O
ESTN
.N
CH
D
D
A
T
CIT
Y
KIN
G LO
PAR
18
HARRISON
STREET
RAIL
ROAD
CENT
RAL
ILLINI
OS
STREET
A
D
D
IT
IO
N
CO
N
D
IT
WALNUT
ET
RE
3
4
5
6
18
15
16
15
11
12
5
6
ST
1
2
21
14
16
S
EB
W 10
1
2
3
4
TH
20
19
10
13
6
7
30
29
28
27
26
25
48
41
EH
U
IV RS
T
IS
IO
N
STREET
18
23
22
AVENUE
RA
AVENUE
D
N
O
EC
S17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
WABASH
14
16
5
BR
7 6 5 4 32 1
8
21
20
SO
910111213141516
20
19
17
17
16
16
15
14
BR
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
10
13
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
13
12
11
10
4
5
6
7
8
9
HIL
27 2625 2423 22 21 2019 18 17 16 15 1413 12 1110 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
S EC .
UT
LN
REDIVISION OF ROLSTON
WA
19
20
30
29
S EC .
29
C O R .
21
COPPLE ROAD
28
14
C O R.
23
27
26
27
CO R .
C O R .
11
10
15
16
17
18
8
19
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
19
22
22
28
13
12
18
17
16
15
14
13
S EC .
S EC .
20 21
22
21
20
11
BRONSON
AD
RO
10
U
EN
16
ROAD
AV
1
15
14
13
12
11
10
SHAWNEE
2
3
CE
A
STREET
11
10
N
SO
PL
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
18 17 16 15 14 13
11
15
14
6
7
D
HU
12
22
10
12
16
15
14
AVENUE
1
2
10
7
8
14
11 P
15
12
21
O
SAVENUE
13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
CE
13
LA
13
19
18
17
10
9
8
7
10
9
8
21
18
32
13
2
3
4
5
11
1
N
19
12
54
22
18
11
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
CHICAGO
11
COTTAGE
121110 9 8 7
IRVINGTON
17
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
12
15
22
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
76
18
17
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AVENUE
R .
ROAD
3
4
12
CE
A 12
NK
PL
16
15
11
12
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
47
17
14
72
20
21
22
10
7
8
9
10
11
12
51
17
C O
14
6
11
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
11
ET
67 8 D 9 10 11
33
67
71
73
3
WABASH
STREET
17
11
13
12
.
O
12
10
12
RE
EN
6
7
20
19
30
29
28
27
26
IO
30
STREET
20
19
18
13
ST
TE
24
23
22
21
JAMES
CK
O
17
ROLSTON
STREET
20
19
18
T
BS
RE
16
13
19
25
15
7
8
WALL
14
15
16
22
21
21
14
ES
H
14
11
TH
UR
ON
I
IT
32 1 C 4
66
10 11 12
STREET
74
51
41
42
D2
PLACE
18
CALUMET
20
OUTR
RACCOON LAKE 5TH ADDITION
1
.
STREET
19
18
17
11
12
13
24
23
12
13
12 13 14 15
10
24
22
MAIN
15
16
STREET
21
20
25
EC
14
UE
14
23
EN
12
13
23
22
8
9
10
CEMETERY
24
23
22
52
42
48
EAST SUBDIVISION
46
CLUB
6
IL
AV
17
11
7 6 5
4 3 2
1
13
25
FO
2 1
18
AD
25
24
T
DI
12
EN
ST
1
3
4
ER
12
22
20
11
43
10
ER
ERSO
16
20
19
10
2 ION
JEFF
B
CEN
TER
15
22
21
13
S
ER 14
U
RE
23
7 6 5 4
3 21
ENU
12
25
24
STREET
11
19
18
17
STREET
STREET
9
10
AV
14
15
16
21
20
BROOKSIDE
13
S
R
E
L
IL
SE
ARTHUR
12
25
24
23
22
WAMAC
11
ROY
8
9
10
11
10
EA
18
17
16
15
11
21
BD
SU
42
TH
D
B
ROAD
7 6 5
4 3 2
1
13
TE
19
2
3
13
13
LA
1
I
2ADDIT 1NO.
RN
22 21
23
23
EC
41
7 6 5
4 3 2
1
10
11
12
SC
11
10
UR
R1
SI
STREET
10
18
10
BE
30
29
28
27
40
8
7
30
7
10
STREET
IS
TON
15
16
FO
16
CE11
PL
13
SU
JUNIOR
26 S
25
39
SO
IV
IRVING
7
8
STREET
17
8
9
10
T
H 15
11
IG
14
12 HE
N7
AVENUE
IV
BD 7
24
38
15
70
55
HIGH SCHOOL
2
3
4
LD
FE8 9
AC
M
A
10
WASHINGT
ON COUNTY
14
15
16
12
ILW AST
AY
21
20
19
17
16
RY 2
A3
18
12
14
20
STREET
6
7
18
17
16
15
14
10
RA
2
3
4
5
20
19
10 11 12
18
10
16
10
C O R.
13
14
7
8
11
TH
ER
N
24
23
22
21
6
7
8
9
12
3 2
25
2
3
4
5
29
LANE
CLINTON
COUNTY
13
AD5
TT3
8
9
15
14
13
12
13
13
39
23
21
21
26 25
3
4
5
SO
U
9
11
ON
TI
DI 12
17
16
10
12
FIFTEENTH
KENT
23 24
16
8
7
40
3 2 1
19
17
QUINCE
S EC .
14
15
13
22
TS 21
12
23
9
10
13
10
SANDER
11
14 15 16 17
11
10
11
10
10
STREET
2 3
11
26
19
3 2 1
9
10
14
13
25
24
STREET
10
20
T
N
KROGER
SA STREET
7
EA6 5 4 3 2
8 PL
15
18
13
18
11
9
8
11
S EC .
STREET
EAST THIRTEENTH
10
5 6 7 8
5 4
15
GARDNER SUBDIVISION
TWELFTH
SE
R
EL
36
9 8 7 6
4 3 2 1
10111213 14 15 16 17 18
EAST
1
2
10
32
10
11
12
6
M
7 P
22
4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2
EAST
1
STREET
19
12
9 10 11121314 15 16
9N
11
5 4 3 2 1
23
10
STREET
9 8 7 65 4 3 2 1
10
18
AN
EM
OL
12
11
5 6 7 8
ELEVENTH
A 4 3 2 1
CE
101112 1314 1516 17 18
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
13
10
4 3 2 1
10
26
20
9
8
6 7 8 9 10
SK
ON
TI STREET
DI
25
23
13
2 1
17
12
10
6 7 8 9
QUINCE
18
PEACH
3 2
10 11 12
10
19
12
5 4 3 2 1
21
ER
20
11
13
21
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3
4
19
STREET
12
23
11
FRAZIER
CENTRALIA
CE
7
8
9
C O R .
PL
15
14
18 17
5 6 7 8
STREET
9 8 76 5 4 3 2 1
EAST
5
24
14
4
5
AD
11
EAST SEVENTE
ETH STREET
AD
12
FOURTEENTH
8 7
18
5 4 3 2 1
10
9
8
PLUM
10
THIRTEENTH
10
5 4 3 2 1 1
24
12 11 10 9
14 15
6 7 8 9 10 2
13
STREET
5
EAST SIXTEENTH STREET
3 2 1
6 5 4 3 2 1
13
TS
9 8 7 6
10
21
7 6 5 4
7 6
21
18
17
2 1
10
18
10
9 10 11 12
EAST FIFTEENTH ST.

6
20
EAST
5 4 3 2
1
6 7 8 9
4
5
CHERRY
15
14
10
10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18
TENTH
ON
TI 2
DI
10
EAST
15
2 1
15
14
STREET
6 7 8 9
10
FIFTEENTH
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
5 4 3 2
1
10
STREET
TWELFTH
10
7
6
10
17
16
13
28
PARK
2
3
A
4
9
ON
TI
DI 8
11
16
24
22
39
AVENUE
19
45
35
10
EAST
10
22
2
3
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
15
PEACH
12
10
O
RR
BA 8
18
7 6
4 3 2 1
27
SUBDIVISION
FO
75
SU
STREET
10
AVENUE
STREET
STREET
11
17
10
STREET
WEST SEVENTEENTH STREET
M
P
1
2
10
T
13 14 15
19
16 17 TE
RS20 21 22 23 24
18
K
STREET
A
SALINE
10
16
RI
WEST SIXTEENTH STREET
19 20
12 11 10
9 8 7
6 5 4
3 2
6
7
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
12
16
OUT
12
25
23
AVENUE
WOODS LANE
ELEVENTH
2 1
10
AIRPORT ROAD
RO
17 18
STREET
13 12 11
10 9 8
7 6 5
4 3 2
1
8
9
7
6
EAST
6
7
1
2
19
4
5
EAST
4
STREET
1
2
3
3
4
37
36
35
30
IVE
9
8
13
STREET
14
ON
TI
DI
AD8 9 10 11 12 5
4 3
11
DR
1
15 16
TENTH
10
6 5 4 3
BU
13
17
SUB
OUT
13
31
ON
10
26
14
LT
ADDITION
STREET
EI
11 12 13
14
4
5
CR
2
3
Y
4
SB
O
8
7
12
91
COUNTRY
26
12
ES
R
R32
FU
SEARS
CASE
CASE
21 22
CAHOKI
Y
SB1
STREET
TWELFTH
AND
TS
H
G
STREET
5 4
CR
11
10
P.
13
15
MUNICIPAL
16
10
STREET
10
1 2 3
3
4
10
3
SE
16
OUT
CENTRALIA
6
7
2
3
8
7
90
4
4
64
63
62
61
13
3
4
10
2
3
10
92
25
CORONADO
10
10
5
10
5
WEST FOURTEENTH
STREET
MARION
8
9
8
9
AVENUE
ON
SI
14 15 16
17 18
12 11 10
9 8
24
17 18 19
20
2
3
4
VI
ELEVETH
15
14
CHARLES DRIVE
34
FULTON
WEST THIRTEENTH
1
10
24
DRIVE
A11 12 13 14
8 9
THIRD
2
3
11
89
6 7
15
9 8
12 11
10
7
6
5
STATE
24
7 8 9 10 1112 5 6
14
49
29
47
48
SUBDIVISION
10
SOUTH
10
10
SOUTH
STR
SU
EET
23
BOND
7
8
IN
13
2
3
STREET
10
4
5
WEST
LE
20
HN
KI22
10
I
BD
21
ST. LOUIS ST.
ER6
ST
EB
W
14 15 16
14
12 11 10
9
19
MACOUP
IN
11 10
1213
13
22
13
WABASH
21
10
17 16 15
14 13
20
23
24
KIA
10
4
5
11
13
15
11
19
6
7
KASKAS
12
1
2
12
STREET
11
10
T
H 4
G
6
7
18
1S
EI
H9
10
4
5
CALUMET
EAST
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
11
11
WEST
12
TENTH
10
10
16
15
14
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
12
STREET
18
17
10
WALNUT
S
IN
15
14
13
NTH
6
7
8
EHNNGER
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
THIRTEE
1
12
11
10
LE
N
IH 1
K
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
9
8
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
HICKORY
10
1
2
3
4
12
WEST
15
14
McCLELLAND
11
12
EY
G
EI
12
14
13
14
7
8
9
10
11
12
22
21
20
19
STREET
12
13
18
17
16
10
23
STREET
STREET
11
13
14
3
4
5
6
13
TWELF
TH
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
19
12
FI
AVE.
14
12
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
8
9
10
11
24
22
21
20
R .
WEST
23
4
5
6
16
15
14
WEST
24
22
21
20
19
9
10
11
18
17
12
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
11
13
13
7
8
9
10
24
23
4
5
6
16
15
14
BROOKSIDE
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
22
19
17
STREET
TS
18
21
20
BEACHUM
TERRY
PU
LL
EN
S
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
16
23
21
20
19
18
24
5
6
80
T
SI
5 6 7 8
PARKING LOT
93
88
6 5 4 3 2
1 4 3 2 1
EAST
10
3
4
2
7
4
1
5
14 13
ET
87
10
4
STRE
81
11
STREET
EIGH
TH
3
4
ET
100
GOLF
19
28
27
50
51
10
ST
A
AVENUE
AVENUE
24
23
22
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
26
25
C O 8
24
25
JONES
DOVER
28
10
EAST
27
CALUMET
WALNUT
29
13 19
WEST
SOUTH
30
18
SOUTH
1
2
82
32
31
7
8
83
94
11
CO
58
PI
15
1110
9 8
7
2
8
4
5
STRE
5 67 8
15
C.H.S.
19
18
17
16
23
RK26
PA
52
76
STREET
H
4
SC
BROADWAY
7
5
6 5 4 3 2 1
9
22
53
57
PINE HURST PLACE
LOCUST
10
SE
.
EC
79
1
C O R .
ST
T
CIT
Y
KIN
G LO
PAR
EAST
7
5
4 3 2
16
12
2
8
95
11 10
18
20
69
MEADOW
84
2
3
4
5
6
10
2
78
13 12
ET
2 DD
15 16 17 18 19 20
ON
I
IT
15 14
13 12
1
9
SEVE
NTH
10
8
7
96
3
4
STRE
10
2
8
7
12
99
15 14
D2
13
17
21
22
23
68
MEADOW BROOK
85
CO
RTH
7
6
3
4
3
4
98
65
7
5
77
5
1
8
4
10
2
11
24
10
8
7
10
3
4
4
6
12
10
17
14
13
4M
5
16
21
20
19
18
17
16
101
20
EAST
12 11
18
10
O
LR
11 SE
19
24
22
21
ET
10
97
7
10
20
19
STRE
9
8
7
SIXT
10
EAST
1
3
5
1
9
3
4
64
1
2
TOWN66
10
76
10
STRE
12
67
7
6
13
13
IT
HICKORY
RTH
NO
ET
ET
86
M. & I. RAILROAD
STREET
STREET
TH
23
CHERRY
EIGH
14
S EC .
RTH
75
4
5
10
103
1
2
WES
16
15
14
NO
ET
10
68
STRE
1
74
EAST
12
11
10
63
9
3
10
14
ADDITION 1
02
FIFT
H
9
8
16
77
DRIVE
TH
3
4
15
14
13
11
SOU
73
8
7
12
SEVE
NTH
69
13
6
10
SCHOOL
NO
BEECH
7
WES
GROVE
14
104
5
1
17
78
20
ET
1514
13
13
14
4 5 6 11
7 6 5 4 3 2
SUBDIVISION
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
2 1
WILLOW
70
8
4
STRE
ET
H ST
RE
BEEC
7
10
62
9
8
STRE
10
8
9
18
EAST
108
16
44
80
NANCY
STREET
5
1
3
4
1
9
4 3
2
107
8 9 1011 5 P
67 8
DRIVE
SEVENTH
9
8
7
15
DRIVE
EDGEBROOK
24
79
PLACE
WEST
SUBDIVISION NO. 2
14 13 12 11
10
61
10
ET
15
49
109
4
6
11
10
STRE
9
3
12
11
10
2
71
SIXT
H
EAST
14
13
7
6
3LE
4 3 2
SARA
15
5
6
10
8 7 6 5
F.A
THOMAS
60
25
81
S
9
TY
U11 12 1314
. D10
SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION
12
10
72
13
4
2
3
CE
LA
14
MARILYN
54
1 7 6 5 4 3 2
1
3 4
AVENUE
SUBDIVISION
SECOND
13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6
32 1
10
2
17
HIGHLAND
16
106
T
N
A3 2 1 4
EAST
15
OL
PLACE
1 B. PULLENS
WES
T
SUBDIVISION
2
5
50
.1
SU
8
20
IV
BD
EAST
3 2 1
12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20
PETERSONS
MELROSE
KUHNS
4 3 2 1
10
2
8
FOUR
TH
4
6
IS
13 14
NC
N
IO 19
16
8 7 6 5 4
P4 5 6 11
5 6 7 8
FOURTH
9 8 7 6
15
E
C
2 1
A
L
PERRINE
12 11 10
51
S.
1
2
14
PA
LI
17 18
110
3 2 1 10
AVENUE
BLDG
15
14
13
3 2 1 4 3 2 1
PERRINE
ID
5
1
55
56
65
NOLEMAN
LINDEN
31
AVENUE
GILMORE
PENCO
BONNERS
59
10
2
8
LINDEN AVENUE
3
4
CITY
ET
11 12
5 4
3 2
1
ET
10
105
13
27
60
JONAS
7 6
STREET
58
STRE
9
3
8 7
STRE
9
8
1
3
10
12
NO. 3
59
14
A
PL
TS
21
WOO
13
14
18
11
EDGEBROOK
EAST
SUBDIVISION
SHER
ESTATES
ACRES
9 101112 13
12
12
54
E
S8
5
4
CO R .
DRIVE
CE
111
10
48
2
8
115
10 9
3
4
5
52
10
47
10
10
2
PARK
3
LANE
C O R .
MELROSE
SUBDIVISION NO. 1
32
9
10
EAST
114
5
FINGER
EAST
ET
9 10 11 12
STRE
HOLLY
24
11
10
15
14
13
12
11
RK
M.L. KING
10
THIR
D
10
112
9 10 11 12
10
C O R .
ET
10
KERR STREET
OUT
S EC .
MELROSE AVENUE
23
N
SA ISIO
IV 1
BD 2
SU
STREET
SIXTH
B. PULLENS
7
NT
5
6
7
8
9 10 11 12
116
32
ST. MARYS
STREET
16
WEST
8
BE
8 S
53
13
12
5
LIC
11
MEADOW
1
MAPLE GROVE
33
SADLER PLACE
10
OUT
9
8
20
ADDITION
98
31
13
JONQUILL
15
8
SU
57
3
4
FIFT
H
PUB
OUT
24
LAKEWOOD
16
10
9
8
7 6
15
MEADOW LANE
7
117
STRE
RAR
10
121
8
7
LIB
19
9 10 11 12
LILAC LN.
7BDIVI
54
10
46
MAULDING
PLACE
R IV
21
WES
1
2
14
.2
DRIVE
14
28
N
O
29
IS
IV
BD
14
22
SU
30
13
6 5 4 3 2 1
STREET
O
SI
15
2
23
1
16
SUBDIVISION
22
11 12
AVENUE
15
12
16
FIFTH
RN
9
8
21
38
MERCER LN
SUBDIVISION
KERRY
PINES
MITCHELL
11
10
TE
ES
12
3
4
118
ND
AVENUE
14
13
55
WHITE
3
HOSPITAL
ET
10
BD
SU
12
18
19
26
40
DALTON
9 10 11 12
SECO
10
2
ON
TI
DI
9 10
STRE
33
9
8
120
8
7
2
8
ET
LEAFLAND
3
4
1
2
2
1
EAST
10
45
10
ET
119
6
7
STRE
STRE
122
11
10
2
12
5
FOUR
TH
9
8
AD
R
D
OUT
RACCOON LAKE 4TH ADDITION

20
4
MEADOW LANE
COUNTRY CLUB
37
SUB
MEADOW WOODS
IO
SI
11
1
8
GARDNER DRIVE
AVENUE
WEST
16
15
3
5
10
2
56
CIRCLE
27
9
8
4
SADLER
10
32
ET
SOUTH
26
2
3
ROBNETT
13
TH
RI
17
BOULEVARD
10
11 12
LINCOLN
D
N
CO20
SE
12
MEADOWS
26
CO
SOUTH
19
10
IS
DIV
11
STRE
123
SPIETH
1
24
TY
HAUSSLER STREET
10
34
K
OA9 10
9 10 11 12
ES
14
17
10
23
S
TE
TA
131
C O R .
124
15
25
21
OUT
16
25
39
IS
.1
9 10
S EC .
130
41
2
16
IV
17
20
SUBDIVISION
129
STREET ROAD
GRAGGGRAGG
STREET
42
LA
RACCOON LN
EA
EY
D
O
O
36
LAKESIDE
W
O
D
N
LA
ON
TI
DI
AD9 10 11
19
CHIPWOOD LANE
18
26
12
10
10
18
1
10
4
5
44
6 7 8
24
20
LEY
(20
AVENUE
AR
C11
ES
SUB
19
6
7
ION
11
10
14
13
8 9 10
CED
WEST FIFTH STREET
25
2
1
12
3
2
3
4
DEAN STREET
17
18
43
WES
TH
17
ST
10
9 10
SOU
18
10
10
10
9 10
16
9
8
2 3
15AD
2
CITY
PRKG
LOT
TH
11
11
12
7 8
ON1
T
DI
10 11
4 5
10
17
35
8
7
1 2
9
CITY
PAR
KIN
G
LOT
AY
10
15
2
DW
31
10
ET
6 7
AL
21
19
LA
CK
OUT
18
KL
OA
9
OUT14
13
12
11
10
25
8
9
10
11
35
5
23
15
34
32
OUT
22
33
16
17
D
AN
12
8 9 10
SOU
9
1
19
11
14
13
FIR
12
STREET
11
STRE
10
42
8
7
OUT
6
16
30
15
10
STREET
SYCAMORE
21
N
17
O
IS 20
IV
BD
SU18
3
4
11
BROA
ELM
22
16
1
2
41
ON
7
TI
8
7
15
STREET
9 10
1 2 3
ON
3
4
5
31
BOAT DOCK
&
PICNIC AREA
14
DI
8
DI
9 AD
10
11
MAN
TH
15
ST
16
15
S
RY
GEA
7
6
18
4 5
EY
K
IC6
ST
SOU
13
3
4
5
19 20 21 22 23 24
FOURTH
CITY
PAR
KIN
G
LOT
STREET
14
12
N
IVISIO
2
SUBD
17
5
2 3
AD
OUT
M8
O
29
OUT
RACCOON LAKE 2ND ADDITION
10
GRAGG STREET ROAD
STREET
10
MAPLE
15
16
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
12
8 9 10
16
6 7
15
14
13
12
10
SOUTH
1 2
9 10
3 4 5
132
NOLE
EAST
POPL
AR
10
37
THIR
D
30
CITY
PARK
ING
LOT
LOCU
ST
13
1
2
3
14
STREET
20
ES
12
18
GEARY DRIVE
21
IR
F13
23
13
13
12 11 10 9 8
7
38
ELM
14
24
22
11
15
2
8
7
6 7
10
10
10
1
3
4
5
6
7
10
26
13
1S
22
22
9
14
28
25
19
17
21
9
8
9
3
4
ORD
CITY
PAR
KIN
G
LOT
9
10
14
15
10
EAST
11
ET
10
39
8
7
STRE
1
2
13
12
5
6
WES
28
8 9 10
12
6
6
ER 7
7
LL
8 MI
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
20
19
18
17
16
McC
2
8
1 2 3
9 10
STREET
3 4 5
9
8
LA
ND
15
10
10
STREET
SOUTH
10
ST
11
RE
ET
12
RO
AD
16
3
4
10
5
6
2 NO. 3
HEFTER ACRES
13
4
ND
40
1
2
14
10
8 9 10
10
RD
ND
PARK
SOU
TH
10
20 21 22 23 24
25 26
14
SECO
1
2
RC
17
16
15
14
13
12
ING
19
5 4
8 9 10
LA
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
1 2
9
8
10
9 10
3 2 1
3
4
8 9 10
128
20
10
9
8
7
6
1
8
1
2
3
4
5
22
21
20
19
18
AVENUE
1 2
KELL
4 5
KERR
10
8
10
AY
5 4 3
6 7
LOT
EAST
3 2 1
8 9 10
ET
PARK
STRE
14
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
3
4
5
6
7
27
2
CITY
6
6 7
9 10
EAST
7
8
27
TI
133
127
13
OUT
20
OUT
11
24
10
18
REXFORD
LEAKE
20
LAURAA
10
DW
9 10
LER
10
13
AR
K
TH
18
17
5 4 3 2 1
1 2
15
2
USS
17
12
11
CL
12
11
EN
8 7 6
NER
& WAR
KOHL
WES
10
4 5
13
19
OO
KE
2NORTH
AVEVNUE
SE
V
PULLENS
ES
T
19
17
WEST
25
11 10
AVE.
13
8
12 11 10 9
BROOKSIDE
10
7
7
22
21
20
16
DRIVE
14
5
6
13 12 11 10
9 8 7
19
101
EASTHAVEN
PARKING
DRIVE
16
15
23
SUBDIVISION
11
DRIVE
17
THIRD
14
2
8
18
21
CC
1
2
3
4
5
6
RHODES
4 5
4
5
6
7
3 4
6 7
9 10
1
2
3
1 2
9 10
HA
18
11
BROA
4
7
STREET
18
N
ISIO
WEST
10
2
26
6
6
14
3 2 1
DIV
26
NO. 2
13
12
SUB
103
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
27
3
15
PU
107
104
12
1
2
E
UL 10
BO
8
9 8 7 6 5 4
NS
LLE
STREET
25
24
JANET
6
8
BLOCK
14
MEADOWVIEW NORTH
12
13
DRIVE
10
20
3
4
19
EAST
14
13
21
12
ORIGINAL
10
25
8
7
9
8
7
HESTER
12 11 10
PLAZA VERDE
O
. N2
17
RA
HOWARD
16
10
TH
109
105
19
18
SUNSET
16
11
SUBDIVISION
LANE
14
16
15
R
VA
3
4
ITIO
D
AD
WEST
106
FOURTH
MEADOWVIEW NORTH
17
17
DRIVE
38
SU STHE
BD R
IV
15
SIO
SUBDIVISION
34
18
37
30
33
19
WEST
RANDOLPH
29
20
36
MICHAELS
21
35
CLARIDA DRIVE
32
SUBDIVISION
31
27
DRIVE
RR
AY
22
28
26
CLARIDA
25
MURRAY
MU
4
5
SECOND
WESTHAVEN
11
108
13
111
6
24
10
14
12
5
6
SOU
3
2
.2
10
11
STREET
3
2
15
14
13
22
9
30
32
21
10
126
15
3
4
11
10
POPLAR
5
4
113
LL
12
11
22
4 5
12
ET
UT
&H
EN 4
13
PU
10
9
8
10
16
OUTLOT B
27
1
2
13
14
RASBACK
1
2
5
3
4
5
6
6
7
12
11
JO
1
33
ON
TI 12
DI
AD
13
ES
D2
13
15
14
13
14
5
6
28
15
11
25
RY
12
11
1
2
3
6
7
OUT
12
RE
27
22
OUTLOT A
15
4
5
1
2
ES
TN
110
RACCOON LAKE
24
33 32 31 30 29
8
9
10
11
CORMICK
10
3
4
5
11
10
9
8
2
1
5
4
STRE
ET
ET
10
PARK PLAZ
A SHOPPIN
G CENTER
10
12
12
5
MAN
cC
WES
10
6
10
9
10
11
12
14
13
12
5
4
22
11
12
13
14
15
16
STREET
13
14
15
RE
3
4
JANET
11
MIDDLE ST.
FAIRVIEW
15
M
AM
14
13
10
23
14
3
4
NOLE
1
23
TIF 6
17 18 19 20 21
9
10
13
12
12
11
14
13
16
14
STRE
11
8
7
11
10
9
ELMWOOD CEMETERY
STREET
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S8
10
11
9
8
10
10
WES
1
11
15
10
24
71
P
SUBDIVISION
G
EI8
15
51
STREET
19
16
13
ET
12
9
8
7
2
3
125
ST
B&G
SUBDIVISION
FIRST SUBDIVISION
114
15
119
117
115
7
6
18
14
STRE
OA
K
13
9
118
116
14
PARKING
49
9
10
17
SO
UTH
10
16
16
121
13
McC
ORD
NUT
15
BROADWA
123
120
12
10
4
5
6
7
7
6
14
13
12
13
12
11
11
50
48
10
9
8
12
70
46
38 37 36 35 34
14
6
15
7
8
16
ANDREWS
1
2
STREET
20
18
SO
4
14
13
15
14
47
11
12
13
14
17
16
69
AVENUE
EAST
RY
17
12
WEST
1
122
10
CHER
19
13
11
18
SUBDIVISION
SOU
TH
14
17
14
PLACE
68
27
12 13 14 15 16
9
10
11
12
13
LI
AL
8
9
10
EAST
8
TH
11
12
11
20
21
15
6 5
4 3 2
KERR
ADDITION
STREET
12
BOND
10
13
13
125
BOULEVARD
14
14
PULLEN
15
22
16
16
10
10
9
53
52
26
I
78
IO
11
26
14
15
16
11
10
H
67
IT
29
OUT
28
1
2
13
18
25
SPENCE
12
19
AVENUE
F
2
STREET
15
45
43 42 41 40 39
9
10
11
O
IS
20
16
15
11
10
MARY A. KERRS
9 8 7 6 5
4 3 2 1 3
SUBDIVISION
WOOD
BOULEVARD
17
16
WES
T
10
BEECHMANS
STREET
17 18
2
1
10
11
8
7
7
6
52
4
OUT
3
OUT
ELM
127
FAYETTE
SUBDIVISION
WASHINGTON
23
7
6
5
OUT
24
17
23
LOREN
6
5
MARY A. KER
RS
SUBDIVISION
10
18
SUBDIVISION
19
DRIVE
RUTH ANN
LAMPE
126
124
SUBDIVISION
20
OAK PARK DRIVE WEST
FAIRVIEW
CENTER
53
54
37
8
3
4
12
10
19
RHODES
PLACE
11
.3
N
N
13
10
44
28
GRAGG
10
8
20
STREET
IO
IT
10
29
76
77
54
.
S
D
E.A
8
AN
2
N
LL
7
IO3
LE
cC 6 IVIS
4
M
D
B
5
SU 5
15
14
IT
5
6
R .
10
11
WES
T
3
2
7 6
26
24
PARK
DRIVE
10
9 8
REXFORD
CO
PLACE
25
OAK
29
49
50
51
52
10
48
EC
2
1
RIGHT
27
1
10
13
PULLEN
43
Y
NIT
MU
COM RUST N
T
ISIO
DIV
SUB
PRICE
STORE
44
45
46
47
18
18
KELL
12
WEST
7
8
16
14
BD
5 4 3 S SU 1
K K 1
CLER OC
TY 1 BL DN
UN
T
CO
LO
S AD 2
OF
CY
PEAR
36
K-MART
15
13
SUBDIVISION
JENNINGS
CHILDRENS
SECOND
37
38
39
40
41
42
CONDIT
17 16 15 14 13 12 11
WAL
35
FAIRVIEW PARK
N10
UTH
33
34
23
22
21
20
19
SO
22
19
21
35
23
KI
2S UBD
12
OUT
STREET
PW
TH
32
20
36
12
IT
WEST
1
TH
OR
N2
IO
IS
3
IV
ET
18
13
22
IO
12
11
.4
N
N
10
26
IT
D9
16
KELL
27
6
7
8
STRE
MURRAY
31
32
31
23
33
11
SE
24
30
24
34
10
14
17
21
29
25
SUBDIV
ISION
15
16
4
5
25
24
STRE
ET
26
15
20
21
20
19
18
SOU
28
19
CO
13
14
12
OUT OUT
18
STREET
BACHS
SUBD.
9
8
22
2
4
5
HICK
ORY
11
30
A.W. PENNS
OUT
10
16
27
BROOKS AVE.
BRUCE COURT
60
59
58
57
56
55
16
L.H. JOH
NSON
RANDOLPH DR.
65
64
63
62
61
NOT OPENED
67
66
12
11
10
29
74
73
72
71
70
69
68
O
U
T
28
75
DEERWOOD PARK
13
27
OUT
26
78
77
76
OUT
25
BUENA VISTA TERRACE
24
81
80
79
OAK PARK DRIVE EAST
DRIVE
17
ST
AT
E
ADRIENNE AVENUE
23
DEERWO
OD
100 99 98
97 96 95 94
93 92 91
90 89 88
87 86 85 84
83 82
16
17
6
2
3
4
1
2
10
16 15 14 13 12 11
WEST
10
11
18
OL
D
15
26
24
23
9
1
12
10
3
SUBDIVISION
13
25
12
11
17
2
1
3PEDENS 2
4
14
15
20
WATTS LANE
22
OUT
WALTON
HARTING DR.
19 20 21
1
2
3
19
14
1415 16 17 18
24
23
22
21
13
C O R .
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 1213
LOT 2
22
23
24
7
6
HEREADERS SUBD.
NO
RTH
12
NOLTING RD
14
12
SUBDIVISION
.1
& HEEDS
ADDITION
11
AVENUE
14
13
21
STREET
PARKER
JOHNSON
JAMES
10
DR.
S EC .
11
STREET
AVENUE
AVENUE
GRISSOM
AARON PARKWAY
STREET)
15
GREGORY
SOU
19
20
1
2
10
A
E
STREET
IO
7
8
16
AVENUE
18
17
ADDITION
LOT 1
HILL
8
7
COTTAGE
18
BD
IT
R
9
IE1
8
GE
ON
US
SI
NE 7 IVI 2
6
3
BD
U
S 5
SU
19
SUBDIVISION
10
CLINMAR
11
11
10
17
12
JOHNSON
11
3
1
9
N2
SO
8
3
HN
S
JO 7
ED 4 N
HE
SO
&
VI 5
DI
B
SU
12
14
15
16
3
4
MILLERS
12
13
22
SUBDIVISION
13
FUTURE STREET
14
WOODLAWN MOBILE
HOME PARK
SHATTUC RD
STATE ROU
TE 161 (McC
ORD
15
23
21
20
CH
8
7
A6
D
1
2
6
24
IS
IO
IT
COLLEGE
98 7 6 5
66
N
IO
IT
D
D
A
16 15 14 13 12
1110
10
WAL-MARTS FIRST
ADDITION
65
55
OUT
H
7T
AC
12 11 10 9
8 7 6 5
4 3 2 1
56
42
34
14
OUT
2
26
OUT
1
12
OUT
9T
25
IC
K
JOY LN.
6
E
K
A
L
41
OUT
C
13
SHADY LN
N
O
O
11 109 8 7
6 5 4
RR
32
31
75
11
KE
LA
11 10 9 8
7 6 5 4
3 2 1
64
73
N
OO
CC
RA
ON
TE
57
CC
OUT
L
A
IO
16 15 14 13 12
DIMICK
1
JOHNSON
STREET
16 15 14 13 12
1110 9 8 7
6 5 4
40
72
74
D
AD
TH
ULLMAN RD
AD
H
10
8T
RA
N
ITIO
OO
C
C
IT
AD
DIT
ION
4
5
33
43
61
23
ULLMAN RD
TI
DI
E
AK
6
LAGOON
63
60
R
A
ME
1718 19 20
21 22 23 24
62
58
OUT
HO
2
3
&
59
39
CC
RA 6
24
11
CO R .
23
16
STREET
37
38
13
12 11 10 9
8 7 6 5
4 3 2 1
13 14 1516
10 9 8 7
9
10
11
12
S
1
3
K
ER
4
CL 2 N
TY
IO
VS
UN
DI
10
CO
B
K
SU
OC
BL
NO. 2
3R
20 21 22
42
IO
AD
0
E1
16 17 1819
13
12
N
OO
K
LA
11 10 9 8
7 6 5 4
3 2 1
12 13 14 15
G10
ER
10
10
11
DIT
TH
DIMICK
1
2
14
10
OUT
10
11
15
AC
10
16 15 14 13
RR
EN
5 4 3 2
12
TE
26 2728 29 30
313212 11
TT
15
14
11
25 24 23 22 21
20 1918 17
20 21 22 23
24
12
11
PE
16
8
9
OUT
OUT
13 1415 1617
18 19
STREET
12
11
37
38
39
40
41
32
31
30
29
28
27
21
22
23
24
25
26
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
35
7 8 9 10 11
3
L
S
12 AL
T 4
13
GH5
N
EI
IO
14 H
IT 6
15
DD 7
7
8
9
10
11
1
36
30
24
4
16
14
11
LAGOON
35 36
CO R .
FIREFLY LN
21 22
OO
10
ME
11 10 9 8 7
6 5 4
HO
12
12
KE
LA
3
2
TH
AD
C
AC
34
ALLISON
11
TI
DI
C O R.
S EC .
9
10
22
23
STREET
4
2 3
STREET
12 11 10 9 8 7 6
13
9
10
2 1
4 3 2 1
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
5 4 3
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5
5 4 3 2 1
BICKNELL
17
10
2
1
MAPLE
WEST 8VIEW5PLACE
4
19
18
JONES
PIN
E
3
2
STREET
SHORT
19
20
21
10
21
11
12
22
ADDITION
23
SE
M
RO
18
STRE
ET
12
17
PLE
13
16
MA
ON
S EC .
C
A
11
20
11
10
10
10
MC BRIARTY ST.
12
15
14
12
10
MONROE
ND
11
RTH
12
17 18 19 20
14
13
8
9
24
10
11
14
15
NO
11
11
3
4
6
8
SEWERAGE
19 20 33 34
4 3 2 1
13
11
ET
12
14
13
5 6 17 18
CHARLOTTE
12
10
STRE
W
ES
5
6
3
4
16
15
TH
13
NO. 1
ADDITION
RE
14
1
2
12 11 10 9 8 7 6
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
MO
16
15
6 5
16
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3 2 1
MARVIN
SYCA
1
2
5 4
SOUTH CEDAR
STREET
16
15
15
SUBDIVISION
19
17
16
14
COLLEGE
1
2
MOUND
12
13
STREET
12 11 10 9 8 7
STREET
17
ADDITION
ELM
15
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
JONES
AD
16
14
6 5 4 3 2 1
12 11 10 9 8 7
DI
TI
ON
13
7
3
12 11 10 9 8 7
AD
12
15
S EC .
CENTRAL
10
17
16
SPURGEON
STRE
ET
18
4
C O R.
LINCOLN
19
11
8
9
10
18
CITY
O5
AM
GARY
19
11
ST. CLAIR
10
L
12
OUT
14
13
STREET
17
20
N5 6
DI
AD
12
13
14
12
12 11 10 9 8 7 6
ARD
S
19
18
20
18
22
11
13
21
14
12
ST
RE
10
STREET
41
11
HUBB
11
12
STREET
10
20
11
13
AD
STREET
UNION
10
11
STREET
AVENUE
VI
EW
14
12
LINCOLN
10
21
11
EN
11
S EC .
SOUTH
23
22
14
13
PIN
23
11
12
BOULEVARD
6
7
23
15
LINCOLN
16
10
RTH
24
17
15
O
TI
18
16
NO
17
9
10
RO
RE
13
18
16
15
ET
24
17
STRE
AVENUE
24
18
10
21
14
15
17
20
22
6
7
21
13
12
27
26
25
18
16
15
15
14
10
22
3
10
IT
D16
1
2
3
4
O3
S
A
E
L
P12 11
27
13
28
26
16
ET
21
IO
24
25
19
23
14
DI
TI
ON
28
EDGAR
SE
CO
15
AVENUE
T8
20
12
12 13 14 1516
12
EDGAR
11
10
3 .2
14
AVENUE
12
13
17
16
27
12
16 15 14 13 12
13
12
26
13
1211 10 9
8 7 6 5
4 3 2 1
. 23
NO
25
WILSON
11
11 10 9 8
7 6 5 4
3 2 1
14
11
13
14
SOUTHE
RN RAILW
AY
28
20
19
22
5
6
LN
10
23
3
4
20
19
SOU
BURLINGTON
1
15
22
21
12
OMEL
VENY
S AD
DITION
14
13 H
IO8N
3
4
20
19
14
3
4
RTH
CE
A
PL
13
10
10
3ADDIT
22
21
24
CK
14
10
10
9
20
18
23
3
4
14
13
11
15
14
15
12
10
17
18
16
15
15
19
22
21
11
12
DU
13
19
9
10
11
12
17
11
14
15
16
17
13
17
24
10
16
11
STREET
11
ME13
12
18
10
18
16
13
18
16
15
6
7
3
2
1
19
121110
11
12
HARDIN
23
3
4
13
16
19
17
11
12
17
17
24
STREET
EN
8
9
10
11
18
18
16
12
16
9
10
12
N
O20
TI
DI 19
17
19
13
KNIGHT
T
EE
R
ST
1
14
12
22
1
2
3
5
13
4
S
14
5
6
L
IL 6
15
7
PR
7
8
GO 16
8
HU 17
18
9
9
10
11
12
13
21
11
21
20
19
NO
20
AD
21
3
4
5
6
ET
21
24
23
STRE
20
6
7
13
1
2
TH
14
14
22
15
SOU
21
15
10
ET
22
13
STRE
17
23
22
NT20
HO
1
2
10
10 11 12 13
5
4
10
12
RT
14
15
24
23
15
14
STREET
18
17
16
STREET
1
2
10
10 11 12
PINE
21
11
12
24
23
15
15
14
13
PRAIRIE
1
10
MAP
LE
12
16
24
S11
VI
16
11
SOUTH
22
DA
13
17
STREET
14
18
SUBDIVISIO
23
22
10
20
TO
23
15
19
25
24
4
5
10
10
11
SA
EA
PL 12
ADDITION
25
4
5
15
21
20
19
24
22
7
8
9
&
IN
RL
26
STREET
23
17
16
13
BU
IO
1
2
FRANKLIN
1
19
18
8
9
6
7
PATTERSON
20
6
7
17
16
17
16
15
14
43 21
ADDITION
12
12
18
18
GREEN
11
20
19
24
24
23
21
20
22
4
5
11
STREET
13
19
1
2
3
19
18
12
POPLAR
14
21
21
20
18
17
STREET
15
9
10
22
3 2 1
22
16
6 5 4
MARION
11
16
10
3
4
5 4 3 2 1
SOUTH
13
17
22
21
AVENUE
18
10
11
7
8
14
15
NORTH
16
15
T
PE
17
19
ER
PARK
STREET
23
N
TE5
18
1
2
24
WALNUT
1
2
R .
RT
12
23
19
24
LINN STREET
C
STREET
24 23 22 21 20
HICKORY
25
16
NORTH
26
2 .3
R
C O
16
13
19
3
4
STREET
PATTERSON
GREEN
EC
GLAD-WALT
SUBDIVISIO
N
12
10
STREE
T
C O R.
20
18
21
17
17
22
16
19
18
24
23
21
20
16
15
14
22
SHO
20
3
2
1
1 45
ROSECLAIR
3
2
1
L
N
.
19
10
3
2
1
NT LN.
21
20
11
13
CLUB
9
SE
15
14
12
STREET
12
1
2
10
11
13
11
SOUTH
15
14
COUNTRY
10
10
12
STREET
1
23
11
9
10
24
STREET
O
V
E
13
6
.
13
WALNUT
300 X 450 AC|
11
HARDIN
15
14
12
25 24 23 22
10
2 3
13
11 12
15
14
14
12
16
AND
11
EE
2
1
TRACT "A"
15
16
CR
2
1
BREWERY HILL RD
10
18
MARCELL ST.
16
HARRISON
16
DOUGLASS
17
17
11
COMM
ERCIA
L
18
12
18
17
16
22
19
21
19
MARIO
4
5
17
21
KE
D
ALLEN DR.
22
20
18
20
STREET
23
21
5
6
17 18 19
20
ETT STR
EET
PARK
2
3
4
17
ELLIS
18
L
A
R
T
N TY
E
23 C
24
C9I 10
22
10
11
12
STREET
24
OO
23
22
SPILLWA
Y LN
12
16
CR
24
2
3
STREET
11
13
ELLIS
1
23
23
MORRISON
10
14
12
24
25
BROADWAY
15
11
STREET
10
25
14
15
STREET
16
26
24
STREET
23
BREESE
27
24
STREET
18
17
BENN
STREET
7
8
1
2
ROSS ROAD
22
21
11
L
L
M
3 4
1 2
22
DUNBAR LN
12
JA
IO
N
SU
BD
IV
IS
23
SHOOK LN
LU
-
13
DOGWOOD LN
DL
N
LANGENFIELD LN.
24
28
S EC
STREET
NORTH
5
6
24
BOULEVARD
STREET
24
OO
CR
EE
CR
D
KE
24
2
25
26
AVENUE
BIG THREE
PRECISION
R O
U TE
1
2
3
11
12
TH
SO
9
10
11
11
12
12
MITCHELL
9
10
STREET
GILMOUR
GOMPERS
FRAZIER
1
3
4
12
10
.S
U
AVENUE
2
3
MOORE
BROS.
SEWAGE SWAN
TRMT.
11
A
LI
RA
NT
CE 1
10
9
10
DRIVE
7
8
9
10
CAHILL
STREET
5
6
COPPLE
STREET
STREET
1
2
3
WABASH
SWAN CORP.
GEARY
CENTRALIA
CONTAINTER
CORP.
11
11
12
12
KASKASKIA
WORKSHOP
INDUSTRIAL
FACILITY
STREET
ROA
I.P.
ELEC.
SUBST.
RI
BU
L RA
IL
AL
ST
DU
IN
WHEATON
PLASTICS
RK
TRA
INO
12
OA
ILR
RA
PA
RN
ILL
IA
AL
R
T
EN
HE
RT
NO
IS C
EN
ON
GT
IN
ROCKWELL
INTERNATIONAL
RL
UNIVERSAL
PACKAGING
12
11
10
11
10
1
2
1
1
IL
GREENVIEW
6
5
3
2
1
S EC .
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
GREENVIEW
ROAD
15
ANICA
DRIVE
6
5
3
2
1
16
LOT 3
MEYERS SUBDIVISION
10
12
11
16
15
13
14
S EC .
7
6
5
4
MEYERS SUBDIVISION
30
S EC .
29
S EC .
C O R.
15
2
20
SUBDIVISION
14
19
18
17
24
22
10
15
ECHO LANE
33
S EC .
28
27
33
34
CO R .
27
26
34
35
CO R .
CO R .
14
13
AND
12
10
11
5
ORTEL
9
10
11
12
13
14
DRIVE
(PROPOSED)
CRESTWOOD
(PROPOSED)
DRIVE
EASTWOOD
16
SUBDIVISION
28
32
11
ROBINWOOD
3
23
LANE
13
12
C O R.
LANE
21
29
31 32
16
GREENWOOD
30
31
10
25
36
2
3
R
(P
W
IE
BLOCK ONE
THE MEADOWS SUBDIVISION
T
U
O
E
S
R
.
.S
U
O
P
ANDREW DRIVE
SOUTH PINE STREET
WASHINGTON COUNT
Y
.
C
E G.
P
D
S
L
B
GOLF
15
16
17
AZALEA
DRIVE
2
1
18
1
4
8
3
5
7
2
COURSE
INDUSTRIAL PARK
S EC .
35
36
LEGEND
CO R .
S EC .
MARION COUNTY
36
31
S EC .
31
32
JEFF COUNTY
C O R .
JEFFERSON COUNTY
C O R .
WASHINTON COUNTY
JEFFERSON COUNTY
CITY LIMITS
ENTERPRISE ZONE
TIF 3
TIF 4
TIF 5
TIF 6
AREA OMITTED FROM TIF
SE
S EC .
S EC .
7
11
12
CO
CO R .
C.
CO R .
1
12
C
PROJ. NO.
R .
C0409.2
CITY LIMITS, ENTERPRISE ZONE AND TIF MAP
DATE
08/22/2013
SHEET NO.
CITY OF CENTRALIA, ILLINOIS
OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
THIS DOCUMENT, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS
INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, IS THE PROPERTY OF
CURL & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND IS NOT TO BE

USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR ANY OTHER
PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION
OF
OF CURL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SHEETS
CURL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
UPDATES THRU 12/31/03
03/09/2005
05/06/2007
03/02/2010
FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS, IL. 62208
03/01/2013
PH. 618-292-9094
08/22/2013
ADDED TIF 4, 5 & 6. REVISED ENTERPRISE ZONE
226 E. BROADWAY
6001 OLD COLLINSVILLE ROAD
P.O. BOX 1349
BUILDING 4, SUITE C
PH. 618-533-4149
REVISIONS
01/07/2004
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
CENTRALIA, IL. 62801
DATE
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM - 184-000877
Washington County Comp Plan Update Committee
SWOT Analysis July 2015
INTERNAL FACTORS
STRENGTHS
Outstanding quality of life associated with open space and rural lifestyle
Rich, productive agricultural soil and properly preserved farm land
County Hospital, Ambulance Service, Excellent Health Department
Interstate Highway Access
Excellent County Road System
Coal, oil and gas reserves
Timber
Kaskaskia River Access
County is served by three Class I Railroads
Industrial presence such as Nascote, NOTS, Innertech, and Prairie State Energy Campus
Well prepared Work Force
Ample Affordable housing within the incorporated communities
Good School Systems
Kaskaskia College, SIU-E, SIU-C and Universities in St. Louis offer excellent opportunities for higher
education.
Continuing trend of low unemployment in the County
Proximity to the St. Louis Metropolitan area provides availability of entertainment and employment
WEAKNESSES
The small population size is a disadvantage where distribution of state resources is done on a per capita basis such as Motor Fuels Taxes and State Income Tax
Smaller school enrollments are likewise a disadvantage for distribution of educational resources.
Very little new development is occurring in the County
Very little diversity in the types of housing that are available
Many County residents express that real estate taxes are excessive
The young adult population aged 18 to 30 are leaving the County at an alarming rate
The County has experienced a declining birth rate over the last three or four decades
The median age has increased
Educational level has remained static
THREATS
EXTERNAL FACTORS
OPPORTUNITIES
High Pressure hydraulic fracturing recovery of oil and gas is a very real possibility in the future of Washington County
With the looming closure of the Dynegy Power Plant at Baldwin the future of Prairie State Energy Generating is enhanced
With 3 interstate highway interchanges within the County to exploit, commercial development is likely
Scott Air Force and its Mobility Command represents employment opportunities and possible residential development likelihood for Washington County due to proximity and open space
MidAmerica Airport located at Illinois Route 4 and Interstate 64 continues to represent opportunities for
Washington County to anticipate residential and commercial development as the population drift eastward
from the Metro-East continues with increased activity at the airport
Outward migration of young adults following high school and college graduation is eroding the progress of
community and economic development in the County
Outward migration of young adults is a detriment to the level of work force preparedness in the County
Declining birth rates, a static population count, and declining school enrollment do not bode well for the
County
Lack of commercial activity and establishments restricts County revenue from sales taxes and makes the
County too dependent on state income taxes and real estate taxes
Lack of commercial activity precludes the possibilities for reducing real estate taxes
An aging population will place greater demand on County services and resources
So glad you came by!
Welcome to the Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update Public Opinion Survey!
Thankyouforparticipatinginoursurvey.Yourfeedbackisimportant.
The County's Comprehensive Plan is an advisory document that is used to help guide the decisions made by
your elected representatives in County government concerning land use and transportation over a 20 year
planning horizon. It is an expression of the citizenry'svision with goals and objectives and recommendations
to enhance the long range planning of the County for growth and development.
It has been said "Without a Plan, a goal is just a wish". Our effort at updating the Comprehensive Plan for
Washington County is dedicated to determining the wishes of the people, and developing the plan for
implementation of the Goals and Objectives with the intention of achieving the community's vision of the
future.
Again. Thank you for your participation. The information you provide is SO important!
TheWashingtonCountyComprehensivePlanUpdateCommittee
County Resident Opinion Survery
1. In which Township of the County do you live or own property?

j Ashley
k
l
m
n
j Beaucoup
k
l
m
n
j Bolo
k
l
m
n
j Covington
k
l
m
n
j DuBois
k
l
m
n
j Hoyleton
k
l
m
n
Neutral/No
j Irvington
k
l
m
n
j Johannisburg
k
l
m
n
j LivelyGrove
k
l
m
n
j Nashville
k
l
m
n
j Oakdale
k
l
m
n
j Okawville
k
l
m
n
j PilotKnob
k
l
m
n
j PlumHill
k
l
m
n
j Richview
k
l
m
n
j Venedy
k
l
m
n
2. Please select the one that describes where within your township you live.
j Iliveinaruralarea
k
l
m
n
j Ilive within aCityorVillage

k
l
m
n
j Iliveinanunincorporatedtown
k
l
m
n
3. Which ONE term would you select to describe Washington County, as you would like to
see it 25 years from today:
No
j Rural,agriculturalcommunity
k
l
m
n
j Agriculturaland RuralResidentialcommunitywithlimited commerceandindustry

k
l
m
n
j MixedAgriculturalandResidentialwithconsiderable commerceandindustry
k
l
m
n
4. Between 1960 and 2010 Washington Countys population grew only slightly, from
13,569 to 14,716 (8.5%). In the intervening years the population fluctuated from a high of
15,472 in 1980 to15,148 in 2000, and then decreased in size again in 2010. At what rate
66
would
you prefer to see growth happening in Washington County in the next 25 years?
j Lessthan5%growthevery10years
k
l
m
n
j Morethan5%growthevery10years
k
l
m
n
j Ihavenoopiniononpopulationgrowth
k
l
m
n
j Other(pleasespecify)
k
l
m
n
40
5.
Should development of all kinds be encouraged or discouraged in rural Washington
County?
j Encouragedevelopmentofallkinds:residential,commercial,industrial
k
l
m
n
j Allow,butdonotencourage,developmentofallkinds
k
l
m
n
j Discourage residential,commercial,andindustrialdevelopmentinruralareasoftheCounty
k
l
m
n
k
l
m
n
Own
6. If Washington County is to grow, what kind(s) of growth and/or business development

would you like to see in the unicorporated areas? Check all that apply.
c RuralResidentialonly(Minimumlot2acres)
d
e
f
g
c Officeparks,retailoutlets,lightindustry,heavyindustry
d
e
f
g
c Tourismrelatedbusinesses
d
e
f
g
c SingleorMultifamilyresidentialonlessthan2acresites
d
e
f
g
7. Do you agree that preservation of farmland in Washington County is of utmost

importance?
j Agree
k
l
m
n
j Neutral
k
l
m
n
j Disagree
k
l
m
n
8. Do you agree or disagree that Washington County government should set agricultural
land preservation as a priority goal and implement public policies to achieve it?
j Agree
k
l
m
n
j Neutral
k
l
m
n
j Disagree
k
l
m
n
9. The current lot size for building a home on land zoned agricultural in Washington
County is 40 acres. This standard should be:
j Keptthewayitis
k
l
m
n
j Minimumlotsizeshouldbeincreased
k
l
m
n
j Minimumlotsizeshouldbedecreased
k
l
m
n
10. The current lot size in rural areas that is required for building a home on land zoned R
1 (Rural Residential) is 2 acres. This lot size should be:
j Minimumshouldbekept at2acres
k
l
m
n
j Minimumlotsizeshouldbeincreasedto5acres
k
l
m
n
j Minimumlotsizeshouldbedecreasedtooneacre
k
l
m
n
k
l
m
n
11. Given a situation where a farm is sold, which one of the following best describes how
you would like to see the land used after the sale? Please check only one.
j TheprimeagriculturallandisanassettothecountyandmustbekeptAg.
k
l
m
n
j Thelandshouldbeallowedtobesubdividedfordevelopment
k
l
m
n
j Ihavenoopinion. Thelandshouldbeusedhoweverthenewownerdesires.
k
l
m
n
12. Would you support the use of property tax dollars for the purchase of Agricultural
Conservation Easements in order to restrict the development rights on agricultural land
that is sold? (An agricultural conservation easement provides an opportunity for farmers
to donate or sell the development rights of their property to the county or a land trust by
establishing an agricultural easement . In doing so, this ensures that the farm will forever
remain in agricultural use.)
j Somewhatorstronglyagree
k
l
m
n
j Neutral,noopinion
k
l
m
n
j Somewhatorstronglydisagree
k
l
m
n
13. Where should new housing development be located in Washington County?

j Urbanizedareas(within1milesofanincorporatedorunincorporatedmunicipality)only
k
l
m
n
j Ruralareas
k
l
m
n
j Bothurbanandruralareas
k
l
m
n
14. Other than farm residences, what type of housing should be permitted in rural areas?
Check all that apply.
c Singlefamilystickbuilthousesonly
d
e
f
g
c Duplexes,Multifamily,Senior/retiredhousingcomplexes,
d
e
f
g
c Manufacturedhomes
d
e
f
g
c Iamopposedtonewhousinginruralareas
d
e
f
g
15. Would you agree or disagree with the County having a policy to guide new residential
development through the use of conservation or cluster subdivision (often called planned
use development)? These subdivisions may permit smaller lots on suitable portions of
affected land parcels but preserve open space on the remainder of such parcels.
j Agree
k
l
m
n
j Disagree
k
l
m
n
j Noopinion
k
l
m
n
16. Do you believe that there is a shortage of affordable housing in Washington County?
j Agreethereisashortageofaffordablehousing
k
l
m
n
j Disagreethatthereisashortageofaffordablehousing
k
l
m
n
j Noopinion
k
l
m
n
17. Of the following types of new development which would you NOT want to see happen
in Washington County's unincorporated areas? Check all that apply.
c HeavyIndustrial
d
e
f
g
c RetailOutlets
d
e
f
g
c HighwayCommercial
d
e
f
g
c Scatteredresidentialuses
d
e
f
g
18. To address future development do you believe the County's Revised Zoning
Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance (documents which govern development in
unincorporated areas and municipalities with no zoning ordinance of their own) should
be:
c Maintainedthewaytheyarecurrently
d
e
f
g
c SlightlyRevised
d
e
f
g
c MajorlyRevised
d
e
f
g
Whatrevisionsdoyouthinkareneeded?
19. Should the requirements of the following existing ordinances or policies be stricter,
relaxed, or kept the same?
Sticter
Relaxed
Keptthesame
ZoningOrdinance
SubdivisionOrdinance
NuisancesandSanitation
Telluswhatyouthinkneedstobefixed.
20. Do you agree or disagree that units of local government have the responsibility to
protect property owners and the community by regulating land use?
j Agree
k
l
m
n
j Disagree
k
l
m
n
j NoOpinion
k
l
m
n
21. Should Washington County actively pursue the protection and expansion of any of the
following, even if a tax levy would be necessary to do so? (Check all that apply)
c Woodlands,Openspaces,GroundwaterRechargeAreas
d
e
f
g
c Wetlands,EndangeredSpeciesAreas,andParklands
d
e
f
g
c HistoricAreasandSites
d
e
f
g
c Other(pleasespecify)
d
e
f
g
22. Development in Washington County has brought about some changes. For each of the
following that you may have observed, please indicate whether the local impact has been
positive or negative?
Accesstohealthcare,
schools,
shopping/trafficvolume
Environmental
Wages/LocalJob
QualityofSchool
Quality/ScenicBeauty
Market
System
SenseofCommunity
Positive
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Negative
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
NeitherPositiveorNegative
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
23. In your opinion, what is the best use of land along river and stream corridors within the
rural areas of the County?
j Agriculture,PassiveRecreation(Hunting/Fishing),orleftinitsnaturalstate
k
l
m
n
j NewResidentialdevelopment,withsetbackrequirements
k
l
m
n
j IndustrialorCommercial
k
l
m
n
24. How satisfied are you with county roads and bridges?
c Verysatisfiedorsomewhatsatisfied
d
e
f
g
c Somewhatdissatisfiedorverydissatified
d
e
f
g
c Neithersatisfiedordissatisfied
d
e
f
g
Inafewwords,pleaseexplainyouranswer
25. What is your general opinion of the extraction industries active, or potentially active, in
Washington County under federal, state, and local regulation?
OilDrilling
CoalMining
Pipelines
HydraulicFracturing
PowerGeneration
Positive
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Negative
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Neither
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Positiveor
Negative
26. How satisfied are you with the quality of life in Washington County?
j VerySatisfiedorSomewhatSatisfied
k
l
m
n
j SomewhatDissatisfied
k
l
m
n
j VeryDissatisfied
k
l
m
n
Pleasecommentonyourchoice
27. What effect has population growth, or the lack of it, had on the quality of life in
Washington County
j LackofpopulationgrowthisanegativefortheCounty
k
l
m
n
j Somegrowthisnecessaryforthelocaleconomy
k
l
m
n
j LackofpopulationgrowthisapositivefortheCounty
k
l
m
n
j Neutral/Noopinion
k
l
m
n
28. A variety of local characteristics influence a persons choice of where to live. What is
your opinion for each of the following in influencing someones decision to live, locate, or
invest in Washington County
ProximitytoSt.
Gov'tServices,
Louis/Commuting
Water/SewerAccess,
Distances
LowCrimerate
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Education,childcare,
Employment
QualityofLife,Leisure
Familyfriendly
opportunities
Activities
Positive
j
k
l
m
n
j
k
l
m
n
Negative
j
k
l
m
n
Neitherpositive ornegative
j
k
l
m
n
29. Some counties and towns have opted to hire a fulltime or parttime Economic
Development professional responsible for attracting new businesses and retaining
existing business. In your opinion, would this be an acceptable use of public funds in
Washington County?
j Warranteduseofpublicfunds
k
l
m
n
j Shouldbeavoided
k
l
m
n
j Shouldbelefttotheincorporatedcitiesandvillages
k
l
m
n
j NoOpinion
k
l
m
n
30. To what age group do you belong?
j 25yearsorless
k
l
m
n
j 26to45years
k
l
m
n
j 46to65years
k
l
m
n
j 66yearsandolder
k
l
m
n
31. How long have you lived in, or owned land in, Washington County
j Lessthan10years
k
l
m
n
j 11to25years
k
l
m
n
j 26to39 years
k
l
m
n
j 40yearsormore
k
l
m
n
32. Which best describes your primary place of residence?

j Owneroccupied"stickbuilt"home
k
l
m
n
j Farm
k
l
m
n
j ManufacturedhomeorRentalProperty
k
l
m
n
j Ownlandonly,residenceinanothercounty
k
l
m
n
33. What is your primary occupational category?

j Farming
k
l
m
n
j ServiceWorker
k
l
m
n
j Laborer
k
l
m
n
j TruckDriver
k
l
m
n
j Construction
k
l
m
n
j Teaching
k
l
m
n
j ClericalWorker
k
l
m
n
j FactoryWorker
k
l
m
n
j Homemaker
k
l
m
n
j Sales
k
l
m
n
j Manager/Administrative
k
l
m
n
j Professional/Technical
k
l
m
n
j Federal,State,orLocalGovernment
k
l
m
n
j Retired
k
l
m
n
34. Is your primary place of employment within Washington County?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
j BasedinCountybutjobinvolvestravelbeyond
k
l
m
n
35. Approximately how many miles do you travel to your place of employment, one way
j 110miles
k
l
m
n
j 1120miles
k
l
m
n
j 2130miles
k
l
m
n
j Greaterthan30miles
k
l
m
n
j Workfrom/athome
k
l
m
n
j Alwaystravelingforbusiness
k
l
m
n
36. What one recommendation would you offer for ways to improve Washington County?
5
6
You are DONE!
We thank you for your participation. At the conclusion of the survey period we will make the reponse information from the survey available
to local media for publication. Watch for it! See your responses count!
Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update 2014
SurveyMonkey
Q1 In which Township of the County do you

live or own property?
Answered: 138
Skipped: 4
Ashley
Beaucoup
Bolo
Covington
DuBois
Hoyleton
Irvington
Johannisburg
Lively Grove
Nashville
Oakdale
Okawville
Pilot Knob
Plum Hill
Richview
Venedy
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
Responses
1 / 46
70%
80%
90% 100%
SurveyMonkey
Ashley
2.90%
Beaucoup
5.07%
Bolo
1.45%
Covington
3.62%
DuBois
6.52%
Hoyleton
5.07%
Irvington
7.25%
10
Johannisburg
3.62%
Lively Grove
5.07%
Nashville
28.99%
40
Oakdale
4.35%
Okawville
7.25%
10
Pilot Knob
3.62%
Plum Hill
5.07%
Richview
3.62%
Venedy
6.52%
Total
138
2 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q2 Please select the one that describes

where within your township you live.
Answered: 138
Skipped: 4
I live in a
rural area
I live within
a City or...
I live in an
unincorporat...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
I live in a rural area
50.72%
70
I live within a City or Village
45.65%
63
I live in an unincorporated town
3.62%
Total
138
3 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q3 Which ONE term would you select to

describe Washington County, as you would
like to see it 25 years from today:
Answered: 136
Skipped: 6
Rural,
agricultural...
Agricultural
and Rural...
Mixed
Agricultural...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Rural, agricultural community
5.88%
Agricultural and Rural Residential community with limited commerce and industry
47.06%
64
Mixed Agricultural and Residential with considerable commerce and industry
47.06%
64
Total
136
4 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q4 Between 1960 and 2010 Washington

Countys population grew only slightly,
from 13,569 to 14,716 (8.5%). In the
intervening years the population fluctuated
from a high of 15,472 in 1980 to15,148 in
2000, and then decreased in size again in
2010. At what rate would you prefer to see
growth happening in Washington County in
the next 25 years?
Answered: 138
Skipped: 4
Less than 5%
growth every...
More than 5%
growth every...
I have no
opinion on...
Other (please
specify)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Less than 5% growth every 10 years
36.96%
51
More than 5% growth every 10 years
36.96%
51
I have no opinion on population growth
22.46%
31
Other (please specify)
3.62%
Total
138
5 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q5 Should development of all kinds be

encouraged or discouraged in rural
Washington County?
Answered: 138
Skipped: 4
Encourage
development ...
Allow, but do
not encourag...
Discourage
residential,...
Other (please
specify)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Answer Choices
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Encourage development of all kinds: residential, commercial, industrial
60.87%
84
Allow, but do not encourage, development of all kinds
23.91%
33
Discourage residential, commercial, and industrial development in rural areas of the County
10.87%
15
4.35%
Total
138
6 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q6 If Washington County is to grow, what

kind(s) of growth and/or business
development would you like to see in the
unicorporated areas? Check all that apply.
Answered: 135
Skipped: 7
Rural
Residential...
Office parks,
retail outle...
Tourism-related
businesses
Single or
Multi-family...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Rural Residential only (Minimum lot 2 acres)
52.59%
71
Office parks, retail outlets, light industry, heavy industry
60.74%
82
Tourism-related businesses
31.11%
42
Single or Multi-family residential on less than 2 acre sites
32.59%
44
Total Respondents: 135
7 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q7 Do you agree that preservation of

farmland in Washington County is of utmost
importance?
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Agree
59.85%
82
Neutral
32.12%
44
Disagree
8.03%
11
Total
137
8 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q8 Do you agree or disagree that

Washington County government should set
agricultural land preservation as a priority
goal and implement public policies to
achieve it?
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Agree
44.53%
61
Neutral
35.04%
48
Disagree
20.44%
28
Total
137
9 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q9 The current lot size for building a home

on land zoned agricultural in Washington
County is 40 acres. This standard should
be:
Answered: 135
Skipped: 7
Kept the way

it is
Minimum lot
size should ...
Minimum lot
size should ...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Kept the way it is
51.11%
69
Minimum lot size should be increased
1.48%
Minimum lot size should be decreased
47.41%
64
Total
135
10 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q10 The current lot size in rural areas that

is required for building a home on land
zoned R-1 (Rural Residential) is 2 acres.
This lot size should be:
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Minimum should
be kept at 2...
Minimum lot
size should ...
Minimum lot
size should ...
Other (please
specify)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Minimum should be kept at 2 acres
59.12%
81
Minimum lot size should be increased to 5 acres
14.60%
20
Minimum lot size should be decreased to one acre
22.63%
31
3.65%
Total
137
11 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q11 Given a situation where a farm is sold,

which one of the following best describes
how you would like to see the land used
after the sale? Please check only one.
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
The prime
agricultural...
The land
should be...
I have no
opinion. Th...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
The prime agricultural land is an asset to the county and must be kept Ag.
37.96%
52
The land should be allowed to be subdivided for development
12.41%
17
I have no opinion. The land should be used however the new owner desires.
49.64%
68
Total
137
12 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q12 Would you support the use of property

tax dollars for the purchase of Agricultural
Conservation Easements in order to restrict
the development rights on agricultural land
that is sold? (An agricultural conservation
easement provides an opportunity for
farmers to donate or sell the development
rights of their property to the county or a
land trust by establishing an agricultural
easement . In doing so, this ensures that
the farm will forever remain in agricultural
use.)
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Somewhat or
strongly agree
Neutral, no
opinion
Somewhat or
strongly...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Somewhat or strongly agree
29.93%
41
Neutral, no opinion
35.77%
49
Somewhat or strongly disagree
34.31%
47
Total
137
13 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q13 Where should new housing

development be located in Washington
County?
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Urbanized
areas (withi...
Rural areas
Both urban and

rural areas
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Answer Choices
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Urbanized areas (within 1 miles of an incorporated or unincorporated municipality) only
46.72%
64
Rural areas
0.00%
Both urban and rural areas
53.28%
73
Total
137
14 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q14 Other than farm residences, what type

of housing should be permitted in rural
areas? Check all that apply.
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Single-family
stick-built...
Duplexes,
Multi-family...
Manufactured
homes
I am opposed
to new housi...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Single-family stick-built houses only
87.59%
120
Duplexes, Multi-family, Senior/retired housing complexes,
40.88%
56
Manufactured homes
43.07%
59
I am opposed to new housing in rural areas
5.84%
15 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q15 Would you agree or disagree with the

County having a policy to guide new
residential development through the use of
conservation or cluster subdivision (often
called planned use development)? These
subdivisions may permit smaller lots on
suitable portions of affected land parcels
but preserve open space on the remainder
of such parcels.
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Agree
Disagree
No opinion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Agree
51.82%
71
Disagree
16.79%
23
No opinion
31.39%
43
Total
137
16 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q16 Do you believe that there is a shortage

of affordable housing in Washington
County?
Answered: 138
Skipped: 4
Agree there is
a shortage o...
Disagree that
there is a...
No opinion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Agree there is a shortage of affordable housing
42.75%
59
Disagree that there is a shortage of affordable housing
40.58%
56
No opinion
16.67%
23
Total
138
17 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q17 Of the following types of new

development which would you NOT want to
see happen in Washington County's
unincorporated areas? Check all that
apply.
Answered: 120
Skipped: 22
Heavy
Industrial
Retail Outlets
Highway
Commercial
Scattered
residential...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Heavy Industrial
55.00%
66
Retail Outlets
39.17%
47
Highway Commercial
32.50%
39
Scattered residential uses
29.17%
35
18 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q18 To address future development do you

believe the County's Revised Zoning
Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance
(documents which govern development in
unincorporated areas and municipalities
with no zoning ordinance of their own)
should be:
Answered: 128
Skipped: 14
Maintained the
way they are...
Slightly
Revised
Majorly Revised
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Maintained the way they are currently
57.03%
73
Slightly Revised
35.16%
45
Majorly Revised
8.59%
11
19 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q19 Should the requirements of the

following existing ordinances or policies be
stricter, relaxed, or kept the same?
Answered: 122
Skipped: 20
Sticter
Zoning
Ordinance
Subdivision
Ordinance
Nuisances and
Sanitation
0%
Stricter
10%
20%
Relaxed
30%
40%
Kept the same
20 / 46
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
SurveyMonkey
Relaxed
Zoning
Ordinance
Subdivision
Ordinance
Nuisances and
Sanitation
0%
Stricter
10%
20%
Relaxed
30%
40%
Kept the same
21 / 46
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
SurveyMonkey
Kept the same
Zoning
Ordinance
Subdivision
Ordinance
Nuisances and
Sanitation
0%
Stricter
10%
20%
30%
Relaxed
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Stay the same
Sticter
Stricter
Zoning Ordinance
Subdivision Ordinance
Nuisances and Sanitation
Relaxed
Kept the same
Total
28.85%
15
9.62%
5
61.54%
32
52
32.65%
16
14.29%
7
53.06%
26
49
78.95%
60
3.95%
3
17.11%
13
76
Relaxed
Stricter
Zoning Ordinance
Relaxed
Kept the same
Total
0.00%
0
84.85%
28
15.15%
5
33
0.00%
0
67.65%
23
32.35%
11
34
25.00%
3
33.33%
4
41.67%
5
12
Kept the same

Stricter
Relaxed
22 / 46
Stay the same
Total

Zoning Ordinance
SurveyMonkey
2.08%
1
4.17%
2
93.75%
45
48
6.98%
3
2.33%
1
90.70%
39
43
9.76%
4
2.44%
1
87.80%
36
41
23 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q20 Do you agree or disagree that units of

local government have the responsibility to
protect property owners and the community
by regulating land use?
Answered: 136
Skipped: 6
Agree
Disagree
No Opinion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Agree
69.12%
94
Disagree
14.71%
20
No Opinion
16.18%
22
Total
136
24 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q21 Should Washington County actively

pursue the protection and expansion of any
of the following, even if a tax levy would be
necessary to do so? (Check all that apply)
Answered: 112
Skipped: 30
Woodlands,
Open spaces,...
Wetlands,
Endangered...
Historic Areas
and Sites
Other (please
specify)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Woodlands, Open spaces, Groundwater Recharge Areas
60.71%
68
Wetlands, Endangered Species Areas, and Parklands
58.04%
65
Historic Areas and Sites
69.64%
78
14.29%
16
25 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q22 Development in Washington County

has brought about some changes. For each
of the following that you may have
observed, please indicate whether the local
impact has been positive or negative?
Answered: 128
Skipped: 14
26 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Positive
Negative
Neither
Positive or...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Access to health care, schools, shopping/traffic volume

Environmental Quality/Scenic Beauty
Quality of School System
Access to health care, schools,

shopping/traffic volume
Positive
25.00%
28
Wages/Local Job Market
Sense of Community
Environmental
Quality/Scenic Beauty
8.93%
10
27 / 46
Wages/Local
Job Market
24.11%
27
Quality of
School System
22.32%
25
Sense of
Community
19.64%
22
Total
112

Negative
Neither
Positive or
Negative
SurveyMonkey
12.50%
11
31.82%
28
34.09%
30
4.55%
4
17.05%
15
88
33.65%
35
21.15%
22
11.54%
12
17.31%
18
16.35%
17
104
28 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q23 In your opinion, what is the best use of

land along river and stream corridors within
the rural areas of the County?
Answered: 131
Skipped: 11
Agriculture,
Passive...
New
Residential...
Industrial or
Commercial
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Agriculture, Passive Recreation (Hunting/Fishing), or left in its natural state
87.02%
114
New Residential development, with setback requirements
11.45%
15
Industrial or Commercial
1.53%
Total
131
29 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q24 How satisfied are you with county

roads and bridges?
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Very satisfied
or somewhat...
Somewhat
dissatisfied...
Neither
satisfied or...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Very satisfied or somewhat satisfied
48.91%
67
Somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatified
30.66%
42
Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
20.44%
28
30 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q25 What is your general opinion of the

extraction industries active, or potentially
active, in Washington County under federal,
state, and local regulation?
Answered: 127
Skipped: 15
Positive
Negative
Neither
Positive or...
0%
10%
20%
Oil Drilling
30%
Coal Mining
40%
50%
Pipelines
Power Generation
31 / 46
60%
70%
80%
Hydraulic Fracturing
90% 100%

Oil Drilling
Positive
Negative
Neither Positive or Negative
Coal Mining
SurveyMonkey
Pipelines
Hydraulic Fracturing
Power Generation
Total
29.13%
30
26.21%
27
2.91%
3
16.50%
17
25.24%
26
103
8.86%
7
6.33%
5
1.27%
1
59.49%
47
24.05%
19
79
18.07%
15
20.48%
17
26.51%
22
12.05%
10
22.89%
19
83
32 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q26 How satisfied are you with the quality

of life in Washington County?
Answered: 135
Skipped: 7
Very Satisfied
or Somewhat...
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
Very
Dissatisfied
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Very Satisfied or Somewhat Satisfied
72.59%
98
Somewhat Dissatisfied
22.96%
31
Very Dissatisfied
4.44%
Total
135
33 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q27 What effect has population growth, or

the lack of it, had on the quality of life in
Washington County
Answered: 136
Skipped: 6
Lack of
population...
Some growth is
necessary fo...
Lack of
population...
Neutral/No
opinion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Lack of population growth is a negative for the County
35.29%
48
Some growth is necessary for the local economy
45.59%
62
Lack of population growth is a positive for the County
11.03%
15
Neutral/No opinion
8.09%
11
Total
136
34 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q28 A variety of local characteristics

influence a persons choice of where to live.
What is your opinion for each of the
following in influencing someones decision
to live, locate, or invest in Washington
County
Answered: 129
Skipped: 13
35 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Positive
Negative
Neither
positive or...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Education, child care, Family-friendly

Quality of Life, Leisure Activities
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Employment opportunities
Proximity to St. Louis/Commuting Distances
Gov't Services, Water/Sewer Access, Low Crime rate
Education, child
care, Familyfriendly
Positive
43.55%
54
Employment
opportunities
11.29%
14
Quality of Life,
Leisure Activities
17.74%
22
36 / 46
Proximity to St.
Louis/Commuting
Distances
13.71%
17
Gov't Services, Water/Sewer

Access, Low Crime rate
13.71%
17
Total
124

Negative
Neither
positive or
negative
SurveyMonkey
3.57%
3
66.67%
56
3.57%
3
17.86%
15
8.33%
7
84
20.25%
16
10.13%
8
25.32%
20
25.32%
20
18.99%
15
79
37 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q29 Some counties and towns have opted

to hire a full-time or part-time Economic
Development professional responsible for
attracting new businesses and retaining
existing business. In your opinion, would
this be an acceptable use of public funds in
Washington County?
Answered: 137
Skipped: 5
Warranted use
of public funds
Should be
avoided
Should be left
to the...
No Opinion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Warranted use of public funds
31.39%
43
Should be avoided
27.74%
38
Should be left to the incorporated cities and villages
31.39%
43
No Opinion
9.49%
13
Total
137
38 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q30 To what age group do you belong?

Answered: 139
Skipped: 3
25 years or
less
26 to 45 years
46 to 65 years
66 years and
older
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
25 years or less
1.44%
26 to 45 years
33.09%
46
46 to 65 years
51.80%
72
66 years and older
13.67%
19
Total
139
39 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q31 How long have you lived in, or owned

land in, Washington County
Answered: 138
Skipped: 4
Less than 10
years
11 to 25 years
26 to 39 years
40 years or
more
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Less than 10 years
10.14%
14
11 to 25 years
30.43%
42
26 to 39 years
25.36%
35
40 years or more
34.06%
47
Total
138
40 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q32 Which best describes your primary

place of residence?
Answered: 138
Skipped: 4
Owner occupied
"stick built...
Farm
Manufactured
home or Rent...
Own land only,

residence in...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Owner occupied "stick built" home
72.46%
100
Farm
13.77%
19
Manufactured home or Rental Property
9.42%
13
Own land only, residence in another county
4.35%
Total
138
41 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q33 What is your primary occupational

category?
Answered: 135
Skipped: 7
Farming
Service Worker
Laborer
Truck Driver
Construction
Teaching
Clerical Worker
Factory Worker
Homemaker
Sales
Manager/Adminis
trative
Professional/Te
chnical
Federal,
State, or Lo...
Retired
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
8.15%
11
Service Worker
3.70%
Laborer
0.74%
Farming
42 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Truck Driver
3.70%
Construction
5.19%
Teaching
6.67%
Clerical Worker
4.44%
Factory Worker
4.44%
Homemaker
4.44%
Sales
5.19%
Manager/Administrative
8.89%
12
Professional/Technical
19.26%
26
Federal, State, or Local Government
3.70%
Retired
21.48%
29
Total
135
43 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q34 Is your primary place of employment

within Washington County?
Answered: 130
Skipped: 12
Yes
No
Based in
County but j...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
Yes
48.46%
63
No
44.62%
58
Based in County but job involves travel beyond
6.92%
Total
130
44 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q35 Approximately how many miles do you

travel to your place of employment, one way
Answered: 124
Skipped: 18
1-10 miles
11 - 20 miles
21-30 miles
Greater than
30 miles
Work from/at
home
Always
traveling fo...
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Answer Choices
50%
60%
70%
80%
90% 100%
Responses
1-10 miles
33.87%
42
11 - 20 miles
16.94%
21
21-30 miles
12.10%
15
Greater than 30 miles
18.55%
23
Work from/at home
15.32%
19
Always traveling for business
3.23%
Total
124
45 / 46
SurveyMonkey
Q36 What one recommendation would you

offer for ways to improve Washington
County?
Answered: 76
Skipped: 66
46 / 46

2016 Washington County Comprehensive Plan - DRAFT

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

2016 Washington County Comprehensive Plan - DRAFT

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

T

Sarah Whipple Photo

Plan Update 2016

Adopted September, 2016

WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD

* members of Washington County Planning Commission committee

WASHINGTON COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION

Brad Conant- County Farm Bureau

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE STEERING COMMITTEE

Goal: Open Space, Recreation, and Environmental Resources

FIGURES AND TABLES

Planning and Review Process

Population By Township and Municipality

Washington County 2036 Vision Statement

Washington County enjoys a diverse, stable economy while embracing and

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

5. To educate the general public regarding possibilities in shaping future growth.

Planning in Washington County

2016 Washington County Comprehensive Plan Update Process

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

Inventory and Analysis

Public, Municipal and Other Input

Draft Report Formatted

Review and Hearings Scheduled

Washington County Planning Commission Review

Public Hearing and Forums

30-Day Public Comment Period

Revised Draft Comprehensive Plan Update Completed

Comprehensive Plan Update Committee Review and forward to Planning

Review by County Planning Commission and Decides on

Planning Commission Submits Comprehensive Plan to Washington

Plan Adopted by Washington County

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

The Work of the Comprehensive Plan Update Committee

Public Involvement in the Process

Land Use Strategy

For the purpose of comprehensive planning, Washington County is comprised of three

County-Wide Planning Goals

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

City of Nashville (part)

City of Nashville (part)

Source: U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2010 Census of Population

DEMOGRAPHICS AND POPULATION TRENDS

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

Topography, Drainage and Soils

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

WASHINGTON COUNTY GENERAL LAND USE

Source: Illinois Department of Natural Resources, http://dnr.state.il.us/orep/ctap/atlas/washngtn.pdf

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

AGRICULTURAL LAND USES

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

WASHINGTON COUNTY FARMS

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

Preservation of Agricultural Lands and Activities

OTHER EXTRACTION LAND USES

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE

OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION

WASHINGTON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2016 UPDATE