Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Other Methods While discussing cases will be the most common method of instruction, other
activities will be employed from time to time. Examples include but are not limited to: the
discussion of textbook material, hand-out articles, exercises, and student presentations.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Class Participation ..........................
Mini-Tests (two at 10 marks each) ......
Littlefield Technology Simulation ....
Formal Group Presentation...............
Final Examination ............................
Total.................
30%
20%
15%
10%
25%
100%
Participation Participation is very important. I expect you to be prepared for each and every
class discussion, so that you can be an active participant in advancing the learning of the class.
Participation means making a useful contribution in a fair number of classes during the term. On
any given day, I may call upon you without any notice, AND you can indicate your willingness to
join the discussion by raising your hand. On those certain rare occasions when you may not be
prepared to participate in the discussion PLEASE let me know by voice-mail or E-mail, so that
neither you nor I are embarrassed in class. I will simply expect you to make your contribution in
other discussion sessions.
I define a useful contribution as any contribution that pushes the understanding of the
class forward. You could argue your point of view during a case discussion, ask a relevant
question, suggest an alternative viewpoint, and/or redirect our attention to another topic which
had not been adequately covered.
You do not have to be a top participant in every class, nor do you have to have the right
answer when you do participate. Do not be afraid to speak up simply because you think your
ideas might be challenged; this is the place for such challenges so long as they are made politely.
Please focus on what was said, and do not attack the speaker. The Participation Grade is meant to
be a stimulant to discussion, not a deterrent.
I judge Participation for each session on a scale of 0 to 4. A 0 indicates no contribution,
and you can earn a 0 by being silent or absent (more information on this topic later). I expect
you to attend every class, but being here is not the same thing as Participation. If your
contribution only consists of introducing case facts, it is probably worth a 1. When you
combine miscellaneous case facts into new data or you begin to make inferences, you will
probably earn a 2or a 3. A 4 is an outstanding contribution, recognized by everyone
present.
Negative assessments of Participation will be made in the following instances (but are not
restricted to): repeatedly arriving late to class, poor attendance, failure to notify your instructor of
your absence and disruptive activities (associated with the use of electronic devices) during class.
At the end of the course, I will determine overall Participation by assigning grades to the best and
the least good participants, and scaling others accordingly. Note: This makes it possible for
everyone to do well in Participation.
Page 2 of 13
Mini-tests. Mini-tests are multiple-choice tests, based on assigned textbook material. Each mini-test
will be administered twice, first individually and then as a group exercise. It is important to master the
course content as soon as possible but scarce class time is best spent on other activities. Mini-tests are
used to help you "get ahead" with the course content so you will be able to make more informed
contributions in other class activities. The mini-test procedure is a good, well-developed and welltested method for doing this. The approach serves two purposes. First, it encourages you to be
prepared to do your fair share in upcoming sessions. Second, it should raise your group's level of
understanding of the assigned textbook material beyond the level of any individual group member.
More detail about the mini-test requirements and procedures will be specified in a separate document.
Page 3 of 13
Page 4 of 13
DAILY ASSIGNMENTS For each class discussion, you have been assigned some Questions
for Consideration found on Pages Six to Eleven. These questions are for guidance only, to help
you focus on certain aspects of a particular case/reading. As a minimum, you should be prepared
to address each question in class.
Each Case Discussion will normally follow a sequence of:
1. Situation Analysis/Issues
2. Criteria
3. Alternatives (note the s)
4. Mathematical Analysis (number crunching) 5. Discussion (argument) 6. Decision
7. Plan of Action (include Immediate, Short-term, and Long-term Plans)
8. Executive Summary (Decision, Costs, Benefits, and Implementation Hurdles/Concerns)
Suggestion: Put yourself in the position of the Decision-Maker. The real issue is what
should be done to resolve the current situation? Your decision should be the logical product of a
thorough Analysis and a logical Discussion.
In Chronological Order, the cases/readings to be discussed this term are:
How to Prepare for a Case Discussion
Reading: None.
Questions for Consideration:
1. What is the total annual cost for each supplier?
2. What additional criteria should be considered before a decision can be made?
3. As the decision-maker, what do you propose to do? Why is it the best course of action?
What is Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSPM)?
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter One pages 2 23, and Chapter Seven pages 165 - 181.
Questions for Consideration:
1. What is OSCMt? How does it differ from the other functional areas (Marketing, Finance)?
How does it apply in the Service Sector?
2. What are the differences between Manufacturing and Service Organizations?
3. What types of decisions must be made by Operations Managers?
4. What are some of the historical developments and recent changes / challenges in OSCM?
5. What might we expect to see in the future?
6. What messages are inherent in the Service-System Design Matrix?
7. What messages are inherent in the Product-Process Matrix?
Process Fundamentals and Capacity Analysis: Sample Questions
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter Six pages 140 164.
Questions for Consideration:
1. Study the case materials thoroughly and make certain that you understand the concepts,
examples, and terminology.
2. Be prepared to explain the concepts to the class, or apply the concepts to similar material given
to you in class, i.e., an in-class exercise.
National Cranberry Cooperative (Abridged) Parts A and B
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter Six pages 140 - 164.
Questions for Consideration:
Page 6 of 13
Part A: 1. Prepare a detailed flow diagram showing how "process fruit" is processed at RP1. Be sure
to distinguish between wet and dry berries.
2. Identify the capacities at each stage of the process. Please do your analysis in barrels and barrels per
hour. (Note: bbls. = barrels)
3. What are the current bottlenecks and how might they change?
Part B: 1. As Mel O'Brien, what facility changes, if any, would you propose for RP1 for the 1981
season? What criteria did you employ to make your decision?
2. How would you implement your plan?
Synchronous Operations
Reading: Chapters 13, 14, and 15 of Goldratt, E. M. & Cox, J. 1992. The Goal: A Process of
Ongoing Improvement, 2nd Revised Edition. Great Barrington, MA: North River Press.
Questions for Consideration:
1. What are the analogies between the Boy Scout Hike and a typical manufacturing plant?
2. What does Alex realize about statistical fluctuations and dependent events? How does this
assist him to better understand his plant?
3. What does Alex learn about a balanced plant? How does this help him at work?
4. What other lessons did Alex learn while on the hike? How will these lessons help him to
become a better manager?
5. What performance measures are appropriate at the operational level? Explain.
6. Explain the drum, buffer, rope method of control.
Note: In the Goldratt material, throughput refers to throughput rate (which we have been calling
capacity or output rate), NOT throughput time (which we have been calling manufacturing lead
time).
What do the Quality Tools do?
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter Eight pages 204 - 228.
Questions for Consideration:
1. Who are recognized as Quality Gurus? What did each guru contribute to our understanding
of Quality?
2. How is Quality defined in terms of - goods? - services?
3. What are the four categories that comprise the cost of quality?
4. What is Total Quality Management? What are the major elements of such a program?
5. What does ISO Certification entail? What is the rationale behind such a program?
6. What are the basic quality control tools? What purpose does each tool perform?
Instructions: Be prepared to do an in-class exercise based on the assigned reading.
Page 7 of 13
Deutsche Allgemeinversicherung
Additional Reading: Study Jacobs et al., Chapter Eight pages 229 - 255.
Questions for Consideration:
1. Why is DAV using Statistical Process Control (SPC)? What are the primary challenges in
applying SPC to a service industry compared with manufacturing?
2. If you were to explain (in about thirty minutes) the concept of a p-chart to, say, a group of bank
tellers who have little background in SPC, how would you do it?
3. How large should each sample be for the experiment described by Schoss and Kluck?
4. The first twelve weeks of the data in Exhibit 4 represent the diagnostic period for the Policy
Extension Group. What are the 3-sigma control limits for the process? In which of the
subsequent weeks is the process out of control (if any)?
5. As Annette Kluck, what are your specific implementation plans? How do you intend to begin
improving the performance of the operation?
Cranston Nissan
Additional Reading: Study Jacobs et al., Chapter Eight pages 204 - 255.
Questions for Consideration:
Answer the following questions from the perspective of TQM.
1. Categorize the quality problems in this case.
2. What are the probable causes of so many mishaps?
3. Prepare a cause-and-effect chart for "failure to remedy repair problem to customer satisfaction.'
4. a) What specific actions should Jackson take immediately?
b) What should some of his longer-term goals be?
MacPherson Refrigeration Limited
Additional Reading: Study Jacobs et al., Chapter Nine pages 258 - 287.
Questions for Consideration:
1. What are the relevant tradeoffs at MacPherson?
2. Construct an aggregate plan better than the ones shown in the case.
3. What criteria and assumptions did you use?
4. How flexible is your plan?
5. How would your plan change if MacPherson produced-to-order rather than produced-to-stock?
6. What effect does the timing of peaks have?
Note: Before constructing your aggregate plan, please ensure that you adjust the data in the case
according to any instructions handed out for your section. For your convenience, a spreadsheet will
be made available to help with your trial-and-error aggregate planning attempts. You are not
required to use the spreadsheet. It just makes life easier.
Page 8 of 13
Illustrious Corporation
Reading: Jacobs et al, Chapter Eleven pages 332 - 357.
Questions for Consideration:
1. What is the difference between dependent demand and independent demand?
2. As Nancy Barfield, prepare the operating plan for the next ten weeks. Fill in the forms
provided in the Reserve materials, and use the lot-for-lot ordering rule.
3. What problems did you discover? What course of action do you recommend? Why?
4. What is closed-loop MRP? What is required to close the loop?
5. Could MRP have been useful in any of the companies that we have discussed?
Toyota Production System / Lean (JIT) Operations
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter Twelve pages 358 388.
Questions for Consideration:
1. Prepare for a discussion about the Toyota Production System (often called just-in-time production,
lean operations, etc).
2. Which aspects of this system are "Japanese" and which could be applied in other industrial settings?
That is, what is so Japanese about Japanese approaches to manufacturing?
3. What explains the success the Japanese have had with their approaches to production?
4. How is the notion of waste used in the Toyota Production System?
McLeod Motors Ltd.
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter Twelve pages 358 388.
Questions for Consideration:
1. What are some examples of specific form/function inventory combinations at McLeod
Motors?
2. Prepare a process flow of the BN-88-55 production process. Identify where Work-in-Process
(WIP) inventory exists in the system.
3. Why might the WIP inventory level at McLeod Motors have increased? What was the
previous level of WIP inventory? What is the lowest possible level of WIP inventory?
4. As Sue Reynolds, what action would you recommend to John Ingram?
The ITC e-Choupal Initiative
Additional Reading: Study Jacobs et al., Chapter Two pages 24 - 42. If you have time, you
might check the ITC website [www.itcibd.com].
Questions for Consideration:
1. What was ITC's motivation for creating the e-Choupal?
2. What were the old and new physical flows and information flows in the channel?
3. What principles did ITC employ as it built the newly-fashioned supply chain?
4. What barriers did ITC face in embarking on this project?
5. As Mr. Sivakumar, how do you plan to proceed to develop this platform for the future?
Page 9 of 13
Page 10 of 13
Chaircraft Corporation
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter Two pp. 24-41.
Questions for Consideration:
1. Identify the flows of material through the organization.
2. What are the companys current inventory policies?
3. Identify the flows of information through the organization.
4. What are the major issues facing Chaircraft Corporation?
5. As Mr. Johnson, what are your plans to overcome the major operations problems? Be specific
with respect to actions to be taken, the timing of these actions, the people involved in performing
these actions. What difficulties do you anticipate?
Microlite S.A.: The Pan-Orient Decision
Reading: Jacobs et al., Chapter Two pp. 24-41.
Questions for Consideration:
1. As Luis Pinto, what is your analysis of the capacity situation?
2. What concerns do you have about the competitive environment?
3. What alternatives are available to you? What are the financial implications of each
alternative?
4. As Luis Pinto, what do you plan to do? Why is this course of action the most appropriate?
5. What is your Plan of Action for adding capacity at the Jaboata Plant? Be specific with respect
to actions to be taken, the timing of these actions, the specific people involved, and so on.
What difficulties do you anticipate? What would you do about them? What overall results do
you expect?
Note: We will NOT be discussing how to finance projects in light of Brazilian debt, inflation, etc.
Use American dollars for all cost calculations, and assume that if an alternative makes sense,
the financing will be obtained to implement it.
Page 11 of 13
Academic Integrity
It is critical to the reputation of the Faculty of Management and of our degrees that everyone
associated with our faculty behaves with the highest academic integrity. As the faculty that
helps create business and government leaders, we have a special obligation to ensure that our
ethical standards are beyond reproach. Any dishonesty in our academic transactions violates
this trust. Specifically, acts of academic dishonesty include, but are not limited to:
- using the exact words of a published or unpublished author without quotation marks and
without referencing the source of these words
- duplicating a table, graph or diagram, in whole or in part, without referencing the source
- paraphrasing the conceptual framework, research design, interpretation, or any other ideas of
another person, whether written or verbal (e.g., personal communications, ideas from a verbal
presentation) without referencing the source
- copying the answers of another student in any test, examination, or take-home assignment
- providing answers to another student in any test, examination, or take-home assignment
- taking any unauthorized materials into an examination or term test (crib notes)
- impersonating another student or allowing another person to impersonate oneself for the
purpose of submitting academic work or writing any test or examination
- stealing or mutilating library materials
- accessing test prior to the time and date of the scheduled sitting
- changing name or answer(s) on a test after that test has been graded and returned
- submitting the same paper or portions thereof for more than one assignment, without
discussions with the instructors involved
Page 12 of 13
Page 13 of 13