Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
OF RETAINING WALLS
Learning
g Outcomes:
Batter
Drainage Hole
Toe
Classification of
Retaining walls
Cantilever retaining wall-RCC
(Inverted T and L)
Counterfort retaining wall-RCC
Buttress wall
wall-RCC
RCC
Classification of Retaining
walls
Backfill
Tile
drain
Gravity RW
Backfill
L-Shaped RW
T-Shaped RW
Backfill
Counterfort
Counterfort RW
Buttress
Weep
hole
Buttress RW
4
GL
Pa
GL
h
H
GL
Pa
M
kaH
H=stem height
7
= (1-sin)/(1+sin)=tan
(1 sin)/(1+sin)=tan2
GL
2
2
cos + cos cos
Where =Angle of
surcharge
Total pressure at bottom
=Pa= ka H2/2
Stability requirements of RW
Following conditions must be
satisfied
f d for
f stability
bl
off wall
ll
It should
h ld nott overturn
t
It should not slide
i.e Max. pressure at the toe should
not exceed the safe bearing
capacity of the soil under working
condition
10
11
= Resisting force to
g/
force
sliding/Horizontal
causing sliding
= W/Pa 1.55
(=1.4/0.9)
Friction W
SLIDING OF WALL
12
H
H+a
A R
PA
B
=45 + /2
pp
ka(H+a)
14
M i
Maximum
pressure at the
h toe
x1
x2
W4
W1
W2
Pa
R
W3
T
x
b/6
b
Pmax
H/3
b/2
Pmin.
Pmin
W
=
b
6e
1 b
b
b
16
Depth of foundation
Rankines
R ki fformula:
l
Df =
SBC 1 sin
1 + sin
SBC 2
ka
=
Df
17
Preliminary Proportioning
(T shaped wall)
Stem: Top width 200 mm
to 400 mm
Base slab width b= 0.4H to
0.6H, 0.6H to 0.75H for
f
surcharged wall
Base
B
slab
l b thickness=
thi k
H/10
to H/14
Toe projection= (1/3-1/4)
(1/3 1/4)
Base width
200
tp= (1/3-1/4)b
H/10
H/14
b 0.4H
b=
0 4H tto 0.6H
0 6H
18
Behaviour or
structural action
and design of
stem, heel and toe
slabs are same as
that of any
cantilever slab.
19
Dist
Dist.
from
top
h1
Ast/2
h2
h1c
Every
alternate
bar cut
Ldt
Ast
h2
Ast/2
Ast
Provided
Ast
C
Cross
section
ti
C t il
Curtailment
t curve
20
Design
g of stem
As(min)=14/fy bd
1.34As =
Development length (Stem
steel)
22
23
x1
x2
W4
W1
W2
Pa
R
T
x
b/6
b
0.75m 0.45m
Pmax
120.6
T/m2
H/3
W3
b/2
1.8m
24.1
22.6
Pmin.
30.16
T/m2
97.99
Forces acting
on the wall
and the
pressure
below the wall
P
Pressure
below
b l
th
the R
Retaining
t i i W
Wallll
24
Design of heel
120.6
T/m2
30.16
T/m2
25
x
d
x
Ldt
26
Other deatails
Construction joint
Drainage
27
28
Design
g and Detailing
g of
Counterfort Retaining
wall
ll
Counterfort Retaining
g wall
CF
Stem
Base Slab
CRW
30
Parts of CRW
Same as that of Cantilever Retaining wall
Plus Counterfort
Stem
Counterforts
Heel
Toe
Base slab
C
Cross
section
ti
Pl
Plan
31
Design of Stem
The stem acts as a continuous slab
Soil pressure acts as the load on the
slab.
Earth pressure varies linearly over the
height
The slab deflects away from the earth
f
face
between
b t
the
th counterforts
t f t
The bending moment in the stem is
maximum at the base and reduces
towards top.
top
BF
p=Kah
32
Where l
l is the clear distance
between the counterforts
34
BF
35
Design of Counterforts
The counterforts are subjected
j
to
outward reaction from the stem.
This produces tension along the outer
sloping face of the counterforts.
The inner face supporting the stem is
in compression. Thus counterforts are
designed as a T-beam of varying
depth.
depth
The main steel provided along the
sloping face shall be anchored properly
at both ends.
ends
The depth of the counterfort is
measured perpendicular to the sloping
side.
T
d
36
Behaviour of Counterfort
RW
-M
Important points
+M
Loads on Wall
COUNTERFORT
STEM
Deflected shape
Nature of BMs
Position of steel
-M
Counterfort details
Counterfort
HEEL SLAB
TOE
+M
37
a. Proportioning
p
g of Wall
Components
Coefficient of active pressure = ka = 1/3
Coefficient of passive pressure
pressure= kp = 3
The height of the wall above the base
= H = 7 + 1.25 = 8.25 m.
h1=
7m
1 25 m
1.25
b=5.5 m
38
S
Spacing
i
off counterforts
f
l = 3.5 (H/)0.25 = 3.5 (8.25
25//18
18))0.25 =
2.88 m
c/c spacing = 2.88 + 0.40 = 3.28 m
say 3 m
Details of wall
250 mm
CF: 3m
CF
3 c/c,
/
400 mm
h1=7
h 78m
h=7.8
H=8.25 m
d
1.25m
1.2 m
4.05m
b=5 5 m
b=5.5
40
Dist. off
Di
e.g. from
T in m
Moment
M
about
T in kN-m
Weight of stem
W1
25x0.25x1x7.8
= 48.75
1.2 + 0.25/2
=1.325
64.59
Weight of base
slab W2
25x5.5x1x0.45
= 61.88
5.5/2 =2.75
170.17
Weight of earth
over heel slab W3
18x4.05x1x7.8
= 568.62
1.45 +4.05/2
= 3.475
1975.95
Sr.
No.
Description of
loads
Total
W = 679.25
W
=2210.71
41
250 mm
W1
W3
H
8250
h1= 7000
W
R
PA
Df= 1250
1200 mm
450
4050 mm
PA
D
H/3
W2
T
kaH
e
b/3
b/2
Pressure distribution
Stability of
walls
Horizontal earth pressure on full height
off wall
ll
= Ph = kaH2 /2 =18 x 8.252/(3 x 2) =
204 19 kN
204.19
Overturning moment = M0
= Ph x H/3 = 204.19 x 8.25/3 = 561.52
kN.m.
Factor of safety against overturning
= M / M0 = 2210.71/561.52 = 3.94 >
1 55
1.55
safe.
43
44
45
IIntensity
t
it off pressure att junction
j
ti
off stem
t
with
ith toe
t
i.e. under B
Intensity of pressure at junction of stem with heel
i.e. under C
46
250 mm
H
8250
R
PA
1250
1200 mm
B
4050 mm
450
166.61
166
61 153.9
153 9 147.8
147 8 143.9
143 9
kN/m2
b/2
80.39
kN/ 2
kN/m
5500 mm
47
48
49
Counterfort RW
-M
+M
COUNTERFORT
STEM
-M
HEEL SLAB
TOE
+M
50
((c)) Design
g of Heel Slab
80.39
kN/m2
5500
mm
7.75
kN/m
71.26
kN/m
C
D
51
450
1200
A
B
mm
4050
mm
b/2
Area for
stirrups
4050
mm
TOE
D
3000
1250
2600 HEEL
x1
139
SFD
1
y1
71.28
kN/m
7.75
kN/m
53
( ) Design
(e)
D i off Counterfort
C
t f t
At any section at any depth h below the top, the
total horizontal earth pressure acting on the
counterfort
= 1/2 kay h2x c/c distance between counterfort
Counterfort acts as a TT-beam.
Even assuming rectangular section,
54
h =7.8 m
d
4.05m
55
56
250 mm
STEM
0-200mm
COUNTERFORT
7000
8250 mm
12@200
12@200
1250
1200 mm
4050 mm
450
TOE
16@120
12@200
12@200
HEEL
250 mm
12@400
8-22
#12@200
1.77m
#8@110-450, VS
#12@
@
110-300
8250
8 - # 22
#8@170-450, HS
1250
1200 mm
450
#16@120
#12@200
#12@200
STRAIGHT
BARS
Backfill
STEM
B kfill
Backfill
0.3l
0.25 l
With cranked
bars
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68