Sie sind auf Seite 1von 131

CountySuite Civil Court

1 of 1

http://prothonotary.co.lancaster.pa.us/civilcourt.public/(S(bbvpq055bpv...

DOCKET ENTRY DETAILS


STAN J CATERBONE vs. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE

Public Web User Home

CI-16-05815

Close

Entry Details
Entry Date/Time:

7/8/2016

Entry Category:

ORDER (NO FEE)

Notes:

ORDER (NO FEE) FILED.


AND NOW, THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY 2016, UPON REVIEW OF THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION FILED JULY 5, 2016, BY PLAINTIFF, STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
IS HEREBY DENIED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE.
BY THE COURT: LEONARD G. BROWN, III, JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STAN J. CATERBONE AND LANCASTER CITY BUREAU
OF POLICE ON 7/11/16.

Clear

03:36:00 PM

Docket Entry Attachments


Date
7/13/2016 8:53:37 AM

|
Description
CI-16-05815_ORDER (NO FEE)_07132016085321

Pages ...
1

View Selected (Merged)

7/14/2016 5:05 AM

PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY


Katherine Wood-Jacobs
Prothonotary

George Alspach
Solicitor

STAN J CATERBONE (et al.)


vs.
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE (et al.)

Case Number
CI-16-05815

PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES


06/27/2016

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF FILED BY STANLEY
CATERBONE, PRO SE

(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.

06/27/2016

CAPTION ENTRY IS: STAN J CATERBONE/ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP VS LANCASTER CITY


BUREAU OF POLICE, DUKE STREET BUSINESS CENTER, LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY
SYSTEM, LANCASTER COUNTY LIBRARY, DIANE PAWLING, DR. AMINTA HAWKINS-BREAU PHD,
VICE PRESINDENT STUDENT AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, LORI B AUSTIN, DIRECTOR
OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, VICTOR DESANTIS, DIRECTOR, GRADUATE
STUDIES AND RESEARCH PROGRAM, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY, MARJORIE M WARMKESSLER
PHD, HUMANITIES LIBRARIAN AND LIBRARIAN INSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, MILLERSVILLE
UNIVERSITY, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY,
PETE ANDERS, CHIEF, JOHN ROCHAT, CHIEF OF POLICE, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH OF POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MILLERSVILLE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, LANCASTER REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER, DR. L. WENGER, LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, WEIS MARKETS,
WEIS PHARMACY, AMY BRENT, PHARMACIST, DISTRICT MANAGER, WEIS MARKET, CVS
PHARMACY, FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, FULTON BANK, MR. R. SCOTT SMITH, CEO,
FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, NEW HOLLAND DENTAL
CLINIC, DR. WEST, LANCASTER NEWSPAPERS INC, STEVE WEAVER, MANAGER, LANCASTER
NEWSPAPERS, ROBERT KRASNE, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, CHAIRMAN, LANCASTER
NEWSPAPERS, HIGH INDUSTRIES, FRANK MCCABE, HIGH HOTELS, S. DALE HIGH, HIGH
INDUSTRIES, BARLEY SNYDER LLC, SHAWN LONG ESQ, BARLEY SNYDER LLC, WGAL TV-8, PAUL
QUINN, GENERAL MANAGER, WGAL TV-8, LANCASTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,
COPY MAX-IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENT, JANE DOE PSYCH NURSE DURING 302 COMITMENTS APRIL 2010, JULY 2015,
FEBRUARY 2016, NURSE 1 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, NURSE 2 OF JULY 13, 2009 OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, DR. VITO DICAMILLO OF THE LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, WACHOVIA BANK/WELLS FARGO, BRANCH MANAGER,
WACHOVIA BANK, ANNIE BAILEYS RESTAURANT AND BAR, ALTANA ROOFTOP BAR, MARRIOTT
BAR, TELLUS360, CIGAR BAR, PRESSROOM BAR, LANCASTER DISPENSING COMPANY,
YORGEYS, 551 WEST, THE BELVEDERE INN, PENN SQUARE GRILLE AND RENDEZVOUS
LOUNGE, TOBIAS FROG, THE BRASSERIE, CEDRIC BARBERET, ESTELLE BARBERET, BEN
FRANK OF AMALFI PROPERTIES, BISTRO BARBERET AND BAKERY, MARION COURTROOM
RESTAURANT AND BAR, MARION STREET CAFE, MIKE GEESEY, PROPRIETOR, MARION
COURTROOM, ROSA ROSA RESTAURANT, THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, GEORGE SOUKAS,
MANAGER, THE VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB, RUBY TUESDAY, RESTAURANT AND BAR, VALENTINOS
CAFE, LANCASTER BRICKYARD BAR, LANCASTER COUNTY RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION,
PENNSYLVANIA CAREER LINK, LANCASTER EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AGENCY (LETA), MARK
APRUNGER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LETA, REDROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RRTA), DAVID
KILMER, RED ROSE TRANSIT AUTHORITY, LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, KIETH SADDLER,
CHIEF OF POLICE, LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, SGT RICHARD COSMORE, LANCASTER
CITY POLICE BUREAU, DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER, OFFICER BINDERUP, OFFICER
WILLIAMS, CAPTAIN MCCORD, LANCASTER CITY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT, MR.
MCGUIRE, LANCASTER CITY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT AND NON-UNIFORMED
UNION, REPRESENTATIVE LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION, LANCASTER CITY POLICE UNION,
RICHARD GRAY, MAYOR, LANCASTER COUNTYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, RESIDENTS OF 1200
BLOCK OF FREMONT STREET, LANCASTER, PA, LANCASER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
OFFICE, CRAIG STEDMAN, LANCASTER DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CURRENT CHEIF OF DETECTIVES,
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTY OFFICE, PRESIDENT JUDGE, DENNIS REINAKER,
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,
PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL OFFICE OTHER THAN KATHLEEN KANE, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN PHILADELPHIA,
LORETTA LYNCH, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUEA OF INVESTIGATION
(FBI) HARRISBURG OFFICE, FEDERAL BUREA OF INVESTIGATION (FBI), PHILADELPHIA OFFICE,
UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA), UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE (DOD), DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (DIA), ROBERT GATES,
UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, BARRACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES PRESIDENT,
COPY MAX/IMPRESSO OFFICE MAX, COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, LANCASTER COUNTY COURT
OF COMMON PLEAS, LANCASTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, STEVE MIDCIFF, CEO,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, DR. ANTHONY MASTROPIETRO, MEDICAL DIRECTOR,
LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, LINDA S WENGER, PA-C, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL,
CHRISTINE M DANG MD, LANCASTER REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PATIENT FIRST URGENT CARE,
MEDEXPRESS, RENTAL ZONE LANCASTER FRANCHISE, CAPITOL COTY OF FULTON BANK
BUILDING, NATIONAL DECURITY AGENCY OR NSA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE LIQUOR
CONTROL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, MASTROPIETRO ASSOCIATES FAMILY PRACTICE, BLACK
AND BLACK DENTAL, DR. JOHN BLACK III, BLACK AND BLACK DENTAL, SOUTHEAST HEALTH
CLINIC, BRIGHTSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH, DR. LEO DORIZYNSKI, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,
(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.

LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DR. SEAN COLDREN MD, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,


LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DR. EMILY PRESSLEY MD, PSYCHIATRY DEPARTMENT,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL, DR. DANIEL MCINTYRE MD, LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL,
LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, DR. TATE, LANCASTER
EMERGENCY ASSOCIATES OF LANCASTER GENERAL, AMY MILLHOUSE, LANCASTER GENERAL
HOSPITAL, OFFICER ERIC MCCRADY, LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, LANCASTER
COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LANCASTER,
JAMES MCLAUGHLIN, DISECTOR, MENTAL HEALTH/MENTAL RETARDATION DEPARTMENT,
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY, MR. MCCARDY,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CRISIS INTERVENTION OF LANCASTER COUNTY, BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, DENNIS STUCKEY, CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, HOUSE OF PASTA BAR & RESTAURANT, YRGEYS
RESTAURANT & BAR, UPS COPY STORE, ART WARD, PROPRIETOR, UPS COPY STORE,
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE TROOP J, COMMANDER, PA STATE POLICE TROOP J,
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (PENNDOT), BEVERLY POINTS ESQ, LEGAL
COUNSEL, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, LANCASTER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF SHERIFFS, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA, LENS
CRAFTERS, DR. JOHN H BROADDUS & ASSOCIATES, CARTRIDGE WORLD, KOHLS DEPARTMENT
STORE, EYEMART EXPRESS STORE, DR. HARRY BREITMAN, OFFICE MAX STORE #854,
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA, JOHN BRENNEN, DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY, JAMES STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES, MDJ
ADAM WITKONIS, MDJ DAVID MILLER, MDJ SCOTT ALBERT, BRUCE ROTH, MDJ PIANKA,
DAUPHIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MDJ JANICE JAMINEZ, OFFICER THOMAS
GJURICH, OFFICER RICHARD CAPLE, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER KEEN, MANOR TOWNSHIP
POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER BRADLEY BUD HARRIS, CAPITOL POLICE, EDWARD MARSISCO
JR, DAUPHIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, US DISTRICT JUDGE PAUL DIAMOND, US
BANKRUPSY JUDGE FEITZING
06/27/2016

PETITION - IFP- GENERAL TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FEES


FILED BY STAN J CATERBONE, PRO SE

06/28/2016

CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH


CONFLICT - REASSIGN

06/28/2016

CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE CULLEN


7-7-16 JUDGE CULLEN RECUSED HIMSELF - REASSIGN.

07/05/2016

MOTION TO RECUSE THE HONORABLE JUDGE JAMES P CULLEN FILED BY STAN J CATERBONE,
PRO SE. BRIEF, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, EXHIBITS ATTACHED. SENT TO JUDGE CULLEN
7/6/16

07/07/2016

CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE BROWN.

07/08/2016

AND NOW, THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2016, UPON PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE
ATTACHED INFORMATION REGARDING THE REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF TO FILE IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, SAID REQUEST IS HEREBY DENIED, THE CLARK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO
STRIKE THE APPEAL IF COSTS ARE NOT PAID WITHIN 20 DAYS.
BY THE COURT:
JUDGE BROWN
CC: STAN J CATERBONE (1)
236 NOTICE SENT 7/11/16

07/08/2016

ORDER (NO FEE) FILED.


AND NOW, THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY 2016, UPON REVIEW OF THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION FILED JULY 5, 2016, BY PLAINTIFF, STAN J. CATERBONE, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS
HEREBY DENIED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE.
BY THE COURT: LEONARD G. BROWN, III, JUDGE
COPIES WITH 236 NOTICE MAILED TO STAN J. CATERBONE AND LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF
POLICE ON 7/11/16.

07/12/2016

EXHIBIT TITLED "ALLSTATE SWORN TESTIMONY OF STAN J. CATERBONE TRANSCRIP VOLUME 2


AND VOLUME 1 JULY 12, 2016", FILED BY STAN J. CATERBONE

07/12/2016

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF IFP ORDER DATED JULY 8, 2016 FILED BY STANLEY
CATERBONE, PRO SE. EXHIBIT ATTACHED. SENT TO JUDGE BROWN 7/12/16.
(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.

July 14, 2016

(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.

PROTHONOTARY OF LANCASTER COUNTY


Katherine Wood-Jacobs
Prothonotary

George Alspach
Solicitor

STAN J CATERBONE (et al.)


vs.
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE (et al.)

Case Number
CI-16-05815

PROTHONOTARY DOCKET ENTRIES


06/27/2016

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR IMMEDIATE RELIEF FILED BY STANLEY
CATERBONE, PRO SE

06/27/2016

CAPTION ENTRY IS: STAN J CATERBONE VS LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE

06/27/2016

PETITION - IFP- GENERAL TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PAYMENT OF FEES


FILED BY STAN J CATERBONE, PRO SE

06/28/2016

CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ASHWORTH


CONFLICT - REASSIGN

06/28/2016

CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE CULLEN


7-7-16 JUDGE CULLEN RECUSED HIMSELF - REASSIGN.

07/05/2016

MOTION TO RECUSE THE HONORABLE JUDGE JAMES P CULLEN FILED BY STAN J CATERBONE,
PRO SE. BRIEF, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, EXHIBITS ATTACHED. SENT TO JUDGE CULLEN
7/6/16

07/07/2016

CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE BROWN.

07/08/2016

AND NOW, THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2016, UPON PRESENTATION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE
ATTACHED INFORMATION REGARDING THE REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF TO FILE IN FORMA
PAUPERIS, SAID REQUEST IS HEREBY DENIED, THE CLARK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO
STRIKE THE APPEAL IF COSTS ARE NOT PAID WITHIN 20 DAYS.
BY THE COURT:
JUDGE BROWN
CC: STAN J CATERBONE (1)
236 NOTICE SENT 7/11/16

July 11, 2016

(c) CountySuite Prothonotary, Teleosoft, Inc.

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 1 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015


mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

April 26, 2007


Judicial Council
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
United States Courthouse
601 Market Street
Philadelphia Pa 19106-1790
Re:

Future Federal Courthouse in Lancaster County

Dear Sir or Madam:


With respect to your efforts of bringing a Federal Courthouse to downtown Lancaster, I
would be remiss if I did not share this information with you. In all due respect for the Federal
Courts, I would like to caution you regarding the conduct of Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster
County Pennsylvania personnel. I assume many of whom may wish to seek employment, should
the opportunity arise.
I have had such horrendous experiences with respect to Court filings, rulings, and
procedures, I would hope that you would plan ahead to prevent the same problems from
occurring at the Federal level. Justice is the fabric or our nation, and it should be treated with
respect and honor.
Enclosed are some copies of correspondence that I would like to share with you in the
hope that when the Federal Courthouse in Lancaster is operational, there will be an opportunity
for me to conduct my litigation free from misconduct.
I look forward to your decision on a location, and seeing your efforts come to fruition.
Respectfully,
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Advanced Media Group
cc:

Rick Gray, Mayor of the City of Lancaster


Senator Arlen Specter
Randy Patterson, Lancaster City Director of Economic Development
U.S. Congressman Joseph Pitts
U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Stengel

Enclosures
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 1 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 2 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 3 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant/06-5238-200


Advanced Media Group
Lancaster County Prison 625 E. King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
Mr. Dale R. Delinger
Clerk of Courts
Lancaster County Courthouse
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re: Criminal Court Documents
December 27, 2006
Dear Mr. Delinger,
I have received your letter dated December 26, 2006, and you are confusing me. I
have reason to believe that my documents are not being filed in your office or are not
being filed in a timely manner. I have had similar problems with your staff this past year
when I personally filed court documents at the Lancaster County Courthouse.
For the above reason, I am formally requesting a copy of all documents that I have
filed since October 30th, 2006, and sent to me at the prison. I am not receiving receipts
for all of my filings. This past summer my drivers license appeal and related documents
to Penn DOT are missing from your office.
I am also formally and officially requesting a transcript of the court record for all of
my court trials and appearances, as prescribed by law. The trial of CP-36-CR-00028432006 is under appeal and CP-36-CR-0003179-2006 is now formally being challenged for
civil rights violations under 1983.
In Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 13, 76 S ct. 585, 100 L. Ed. 891 (1959) An indigent
has a Constitutional Right to Free Transcript for Appeal of Right.
I would appreciate a quick response to these matters as they are material to
my Federal litigation in United States District Court case no.s 05-cv-2288 and 06-cv4650.

Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 2 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 4 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax

Stan Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
February 21, 2007
Mr. Randall O. Wenger
Prothonotary of Lancaster County
Lancaster County Courthouse
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re: Civil Action CI-00019-07 and CI-06-02271 Court Docket
Dear Mr. Wenger:
There is a problem within your office of the way that you are recording Court Orders by Judge
Michael Georgelis on the Docket for my civil action against Fulton Bank, CI-07-00019.
On February 1, 2007, I attended a meeting in the chambers of Judge Georgelis with Fulton Bank
attorney Mr. Shawn Long. Mr. Long was submitting an ORDER for DISMISSAL of my Petition To Set
Aside The Sale of Real Estate concerning my Sheriff Sale of December 20th, 2006. The property is
located at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga. During the meeting, Mr. Long acknowledged that the
Fulton Bank RESPONSE that I received the previous day on January 31, 2007, and that he was
submitting to Judge Georgelis had not yet been recorded in the Prothonotary.
On February 2nd, 2007, via 1st class mail, I received an ORDER signed by Judge Georgelis, DENIED
with prejudice, dated FEBRUARY 1, 2007. On February 6, 2007, my REPLY to the Fulton Bank
RESPONSE was recorded.
The problem arose when I pulled up the court docket on your computer, and conveniently the
ORDER was under the date of February 6, 2007, the same day my REPLY was recorded. This definitely
deceives the fact that Judge Georgelis signed that ORDER to Fulton Banks RESPONSE DENYING my
Petition, less than one day after I received it, and prior to the time that my REPLY was filed and
recorded. Your staff explained that it took from February 1st to February 6th for the ORDER to travel
from the 4th floor to the 2nd floor, and they used the date that they received the ORDER from Judge
Georgelis office. This is illegal and wrong. You are maliciously tainting the COURT RECORD.
During the meeting of February 1, 2007, I again requested that Judge Georgelis recuse himself
from this case. Without any opportunity to support my motion, he denied my request stating that he
has been sued by many people that come before him in Court, and that if he would allow himself to be
recused, he would have 6,000 inmates requesting the same.
Aside form the fact that Judge Georgelis is a DEFENDANT in the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania, case number 06-cv-4650, he also preside over the case of William A.
Clark v. James H. Guerin, Chairman and CEO of International Signal & Control (ISC) in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas in 1989. Then, my former attorney, Joseph Roda, represented Mr.
William A. Clark, a former top legal advisor to International Signal & Control.
More importantly, International Signal & Control is central to many of my Federal civil actions filed
in the U.S. District Courts in Philadelphia beginning in May of 2005, and is central to my Federal False
Claims Act civil action 06-cv-3955 filed in October of 2006.
For your information, I also enclosed a document that may shed some light as to the dire
consequences of my whistle-blowing allegations of International Signal & Control in 1987, and the vital
importance of my court actions and filings.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 3 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 5 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Page 2
Mr. Randall O. Wenger
February 21, 2007
May I suggest your preserve the integrity of the Courts and the Record, especially since this
matter is now before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, case number 71 MT 2007, and the Superior
Court.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Respectfully,

Stan J. Caterbone
Cc:

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

The Honorable Michael Georgelis


Enclosures

Page 4 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 6 of 231

Page 5 of 12

Thursday, November 19, 2015

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 7 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax

Stan Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
February 22, 2007
Mr. Dale R. Denlinger
Clerk of Courts of Lancaster County
Lancaster County Courthouse
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Re:

Motion for Continuance of February 15, 2007


CP-36-SA-0000160-2006
CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

Dear Mr. Wenger:


There is a problem within your office of the way that you are handling my criminal proceedings.
Yesterday, I had problems with the paperwork, which has always been a problem in your office, and I
requested the status of the above continuance. I was informed, the the Motion for Continuance was
never sent up to a Judge for a Ruling.
This is unfortunate, and given the history of problems that your staff causes me, I am formally
alleging foul play and malice within the Clerk of Courts to Obstruct Justice.
Most insulting, is the allegation by The Honorable Judge Reinaker on his ORDER of January 19, 2007
which he states the following: The Court notes that Defendant has deliberately failed to properly
identify the matters which form the basis of his request by refusing to provide the accurate docket
numbers. I have always maintained that it was your office that either was providing erroneous
numbers, or your office confusing me with the wrong docket numbers.
For your information, I also enclosed a document that may shed some light as to the dire
consequences of my whistle-blowing allegations of International Signal & Control in 1987, and the vital
importance of my court actions and filings. You are hereby formally being notified of the Clerk of
Courts conduct, and its appearance of misconduct with relation to the attached filing.
May I suggest your preserve the integrity of the Courts and the Record, especially since some of
these matters are now before the Pennsylvania Superior Court.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Respectfully,

Stan J. Caterbone
Cc: Mr. Donald Totaro
The Honorable Judge Dennis E. Reinaker

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 6 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 8 of 231

Page 7 of 12

Thursday, November 19, 2015

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 9 of 231

amgroup01@msn.com

From :

Stan Caterbone <amgroup01@msn.com>

Sent :

Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:10 PM

To :

oberholb@police.co.lancaster.pa.us

CC :

andersp@police.co.lancaster.pa.us

Subject :

RE: We came to your home

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Printed: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 11:24 AM

Attachment : JudgeMcLaughlin05-2288ContinuanceORDERDeniedin3rdCircuitCourtofAppealApril172007.pdf (0.71 MB),


Dad_sFileApril242007.pdf (0.25 MB)

Hopefully a jury will decide, of course that is why you all lie, to keep me from ever getting to a jury. And you do lie.
Didn't you get the report of what happened this morning at about 5:00am? I had a digital Sony Recorder with an authentic
recording, which is required and already entered into the docket for trial in 2 weeks, stolen. Officer Pinnone took the report.
And why is it that the responding Officer is never from your sector? I surmise so that you don't have to file a report?
Now, it was my evidence concerning Officer Robert Busser of Conestoga Twp. Maybe you should question him to see if he
took it. He already stole $750.00 from me on April 5, 2006 (or one of his fellow responding Officers).
By the way, it is National Crime Victims Rights Week, and I am one, like it or not.
1. Treat victims with dignity and respect
2. Offer victim assistance services and support
3. Help victims understand and demand thier legal rights.

Advanced Media Group Stan Caterbone mailto: amgroup01@msn.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com Fax: (717)
427-1621 Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516
From: "Oberholtzer, Brent A" <oberholb@police.co.lancaster.pa.us>
To: "Stan Caterbone" <amgroup01@msn.com>
CC: "Binderup, Chad " <binderuc@police.co.lancaster.pa.us>,"Anders, Peter J" <andersp@police.co.lancaster.pa.us>
Subject: RE: We came to your home
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:07:58 -0400

Mr. Caterbone,
Off. Binderup informed me that he told you he'd start work tomorrow at 10 but that didn't seem to fit your
schedule, or you couldn't commit to that. Please contact LCWC at the provided number for a response
from an officer. I cannot speak of what happened this weekend but I can tell you this. I am not lying and
we are NOT corrupt.
Regards,
Lt. Oberholtzer

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 8 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 10 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL The information contained in this transmission is confidential, proprietary or
privileged and may be subject to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the message
is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalties. If you received this transmission in error,
please contact the sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from any computer.
-----Original Message----From: Stan Caterbone [mailto:amgroup01@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 15:34
To: Oberholtzer, Brent A
Cc: Anders, Peter J
Subject: RE: We came to your home
Excuse me Sir, I was in the middle of a Superior Court brief that was due today, when Officer Binderup arrived at my
door. Me and Officer Binderup set up an appointment for tommorow at 10:00 am. I explained that I was busy,

and he agreed to that schedule.


On Saturday when I filed my complaint in your precinct, your desk sergant told me that someone would be at my residence
at 12:00 noon, and I waited all day. No one arrived.

What kind of Police Office are you, lying like this? I expect someone tommorrow at 10:00 am.
Are you all corrupt?
Stan J. Caterbone

Advanced Media Group Stan Caterbone mailto: amgroup01@msn.com www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com Fax: (717)
427-1621 Advanced Media Group 220 Stone Hill Road Conestoga, PA 17516
From: "Oberholtzer, Brent A" <oberholb@police.co.lancaster.pa.us>
To: <amgroup01@msn.com>
CC: "Anders, Peter J" <andersp@police.co.lancaster.pa.us>
Subject: We came to your home
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:01:04 -0400

Mr. Caterbone,
As I mentioned, I sent an officer to your home since you did not have a telephone. When Off. Binderup
arrived you would not speak to him. Consider our responsibility complete. You will need to come to the
police station for future requests of contact Lancaster County Wide Communications at 664-1180 for police
response.
Respectfully,
Lt. Brent Oberholtzer
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL The information contained in this transmission is confidential, proprietary or
privileged and may be subject to protection under the law, including the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA). The message is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution or copying of the message
is strictly prohibited and may subject you to criminal or civil penalties. If you received this transmission in error,
please contact the sender immediately by replying to this email and delete the material from any computer.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 9 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 11 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Officials: Ex-bank best for federal courthouse

Pitts, Gray, Stengel all support East King Street site after tour of four possible locations.

By TOM MURSE
Lancaster New Era
Published: Apr 24, 2007 2:06 PM EST
LANCASTER COUNTY, Pa - When it comes to finding a home for a federal courthouse in Lancaster City, elected officials here clearly
prefer the former Sovereign Bank building on East King Street.
The question is, will the feds go along with them?
Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray, U.S. Rep. Joseph R. Pitts and federal Judge Lawrence Stengel, who toured four potential sites Monday
afternoon, said housing a new courthouse at 23 E. King St. makes the most sense.
"It's the cheapest alternative. It's a great location. There's great parking already. It's available. You get in there right away," Pitts
said. "I think it could happen by the fall, but again you've got to give the courts and the GSA time to make a decision."
The GSA, or U.S. General Services Administration, is the branch of government that owns property and leases it to the federal courts
and other departments. It has the final say on which, if any, of the Lancaster sites will be selected for a courthouse.
The mayor's office is recommending the site to the GSA.
"My understanding of the process is we can provide information, and we've requested information in regards to that particular site,
that we will forward on to the GSA with a statement from the city that it is our preferred site," said Randy Patterson, the city's
director of economic development and neighborhood revitalization.
U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, who also went on the bus tour Monday, declined to say which of the four sites he liked best, but pledged
once again to bring a federal courthouse to the city.
"I think we're going to get it done," said the state's senior senator, noting that funding had already been approved for a Lancaster
court. "I'm not here wasting my time."
The three other proposed locations are the Bulova Technologies building at Queen and Orange streets; the Hager parking lot at North
Prince and West Grant streets; and a parking lot at North Prince and West Walnut streets.
Stengel said he, too, prefers the East King Street location.
"I certainly think there are great advantages to that site. It's capable of being secured. It's vacant. It's owned by the Girard Estate,
which has experience in leasing to government tenants," said Stengel, who lives in the county and commutes to Philadelphia.
"And it's about the right size for what we need to do, and it has the potential for secure parking and entry. It's in close proximity to
the Lancaster County Courthouse," Stengel added. "Those were the reasons articulated by the mayor's office, and I think they make
sense."
The former bank would cost about $15.4 million to renovate into courtrooms and offices. Two stories could be added to the existing
three-story building, said Patterson, who served as tour guide during the bus trip.
Specter said he met earlier this month in Washington, D.C., with the Judicial Council of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals about
bringing a federal courthouse to Lancaster.
"Meetings are on the docket through June and perhaps into the fall," Specter said. "It is ripe for a decision.
Officials have discussed bringing a federal courthouse to Lancaster for more than two decades, and have said many times that such a
decision was imminent. They said again today that they are optimistic it will happen soon.
"I don't think we're talking another decade. I would be surprised if it took us another five years," said Stengel. "It's the use of public
money, and so they're careful about how to do it ... It won't be within the next six months, but it's likely it could be within two
years."
Gray, who served on a local bar association panel in the 1980s that sought to bring a federal courthouse to the city, said he is

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 10 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 12 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

encouraged by the level of attention the issue has received.


"This is the most movement I've ever seen. Senator Specter has always been committed to it, but I've never seen so much activity,"
said Gray. "There's more positive energy surrounding this issue than I've seen in the last quarter century."
Gray, asked how soon he thinks the government will settle on a site, said: "If it does happen, my guess is it would happen within the
next year or so. The planets are all lining up right. And if it was the Sovereign building, it would happen a lot quicker than if it was
one of the other sites."

Specter: Time for U.S. courthouse


Officials look at four possible locations in city
By Brett Lovelace, Staff
Intelligencer Journal
Published: Apr 24, 2007 2:14 AM EST
LANCASTER, Pa. - U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter pledged Monday to bring a federal courthouse to downtown Lancaster, a long-discussed
proposal that has been delayed by problems with financing and finding a suitable location.
"I am determined to see that we move ahead and get this done," Specter said. "It has been in the planning stage for the better part
of two decades."
Specter took a look at four possible sites for a courthouse during a brief bus tour of the city. Along for the ride were Lancaster Mayor
Rick Gray; U.S. Rep. Joseph Pitts, who represents Lancaster county; U.S. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel, a former member of
the county bench; Randy Patterson, the city's director of community and economic development; and other city, state and federal
officials.
The four proposed locations include the former Sovereign Bank building, 23 E. King St; Bulova Technologies building, Queen and
Orange streets; Hager parking lot, North Prince and West Grant streets; and a parking lot at North Prince and West Walnut streets.
"Lancaster is a major metropolitan area," Specter said. "(Putting a federal courthouse here) has truly had a lot of problems, and
there are very tight budget constraints," Specter said.
"Candidly, there is a lot of bureaucratic red tape that has to be cut, but that's what Congressman Joe Pitts and Arlen Specter are
for."
Gray, a former lawyer, said he served in the 1980s on a committee formed to bring a federal courthouse to Lancaster.
He endorses the former bank building because it is close to the Lancaster County Courthouse, county offices, parking lots and
garages and the convention center and hotel being built in downtown Lancaster.
The former bank would cost about $15.4 million to renovate into courtrooms and offices. Two stories could be added to the existing
three-story building, according to Patterson, who served as tour guide during the bus trip.
Specter declined to say which of the sites he favored or how much the federal government is willing to spend on a courthouse here.
He did say, however, that he met earlier this month in Washington, D.C., with the Judicial Council of the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals about bringing a federal courthouse to Lancaster.
"Meetings are on the docket through June and perhaps into the fall," Specter said. "It is ripe for a decision.
"It is a great inconvenience to people in this community who have cases in the federal court to have to travel to Philadelphia," he
said. "It takes police officers off the street when they have to spend several days in a courtroom in Philadelphia, and the litigants and
the lawyers ought to have the availability of a station here."
The bus tour was scheduled to start shortly before 3 p.m. It was briefly delayed while Specter and Gray snacked on ice cream at
Isaac's Deli, 25 N. Queen St.
Specter wanted a milk shake but had to settle for peanut butter ice cream because the restaurant does not serve shakes.
Stengel, who lives in Lancaster but has his courtroom in Philadelphia, is optimistic about a federal courthouse in Lancaster.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 11 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 13 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

"I think we are close," Stengel said. "The strongest evidence of that is the people who are interested and the people who are pushing
for it.
"It's not happening because Judge Stengel wants it to happen. It's going to happen because Sen. Specter and Rep. Pitts are strongly
behind it."
Specter and U.S. Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr. both attended an anti-gang conference in Lancaster last month.
Casey did not join Specter for Monday's tour but supports the courthouse project.
"While in Lancaster last month for a roundtable on youth violence, I discussed the need for a federal courthouse with local officials,"
Casey said in a statement. "Unfortunately, I had to be in Washington today and was unable to be in Lancaster.
"I will work with Sen. Specter, Congressman Pitts and local leaders to do everything I can to expedite a new federal courthouse in
Lancaster."
E-mail: blovelace@lnpnews.com

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 12 of 12

04.26.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 14 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015


www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
220 Stone Hill Road
Conestoga, PA 17516
May 7, 2006
Mr. Joseph Masse
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Judicial Conduct Board
Pennsylvania Place
301 Chestnut Street
Suite 403
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Re: Complaints Status
Dear Mr. Masse;
Unfortunately, in addition to the problems with the Criminal Justice System in Lancaster
County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, I have had my legal files, materials, and evidence
stolen from me. Most of it was recently returned on April 13, 2007, however, sorting and verifying
my files has been a tedious and time-consuming effort. In addition, I have just found some
unopened mail from October of 2006, which was addressed from your office. This was some of the
files that were returned to me on April 13th. All of these matters are before the Pennsylvania
Superior Court, MDA 1463-2006 and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court 248 MAL-2007.
May I request a complete update of all of my complaints and the status, with a copy of the
Complaint cover sheet? It would be the only way that I can verify my documents, and determine if
any files are missing.
Also attached are the dockets for 21 criminal charges that have been dismissed, withdrawn,
or not guilty verdicts returned. I am sure that your office will look at my complaints in a different
manner. And, of course, I was pro se for most of these proceedings. I also have 3 criminal appeals
in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and would most appreciate your office being as judicious and
as impartial as you can possibly be.
Remember, I am a Federal Whistle-Blower and have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that
the RICO Anti-SLAPP provision has been violated.

Respectfully,

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


Advanced Media Group
Enclosures

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 1 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 15 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

!" #

,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
,/
/
/

#
9
"
"
!
3
,

9
"
!
3
,

#
9
"
!
3
,

/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
#/
/
/

,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
,3!
"
"
/ /
"
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ #/
!
/ 3/
!
/ 3/
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
9/# /
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
/ ,/
!
/ /
!
/ /
!
!/ #/
3
!/ #/
3

$ % &'
$&()*%& (* & +$+
$*(
(+ +%
- ( & .+
+ /0+$-.( 0%/%*$1 2+ $'
,3! $*
3

! "$
$4
1
5
4
/.
/.
, 1 2 6 78 6 (
1
5
4
/.
/.
## 9
6
4 8 1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#
)
6 :1
5
4
/.
/.
#!
6(
:1
5
4
/.
/.
#,
$4 8 ): 2 678 $ ;
* .
< # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 # % 66
/0 4
7
#,##
2 6 78 6 2
*8
1 #5
4
/.
/.
3=
# ==
.
6:
12
6 %
10 4
7 > 7
3 = #, " == 9 $4 8 *8
1 @
*8
0 4
7 > 7
3 = ! , == ! 1
(
+
4
0 4
7 >
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
3="
==
(
42
/
& .
> 7
3 1
%
;
*
0 4
7 > 7
?
3 1#
A 6
0 4
7 > 7
?
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = !3" == *
A 4 0/* ( @B
(
%
6 :
3=
# == 9/ .
- C
/ 4: *88 %
6 :
3=
! == / *
- 47 : %
6 :
#/ 3 = ! , == # 1
*8
0/%
% 66
! =#
== / .
$ 88
6.
%
6 : % 66
3=
9(
/* 4
7& 8
3/ 9/
" D9!!
#
3 = , 3 ==
; ( / 66/& *88 0
3/ 9/
" D9!!
% 66
! =
9# == .
04 6 *
* (
;
%
6 :
! = #! 9 ==
6
.
3/ 9/
" % 66
! = #3
== E .2+F
+
/+
8.
8 6: % 66
$(
3# 1 3 .
2
:
:6
6
$(
3# 1 3 .2+ 4
:
.*$
6
8 6
:

?
?
?
?

Third Circuit 15-3400

)6
G!
(&. G

++ /

,3! - ( & .+
+
*2$-&(% (& +*%

6+ 8

&$-+
&

Page 16 of 231

6& 4
8

&. *2$ * ! - ( &.


* + & - ( & .+
+

Thursday, November 19, 2015

&. *( *A&($2(%&. *%

&

6(

6 : > ,3#?

*% +.&( $+*%

>& 4

? !1

!"
#

# (

%
= 3#

(
*(
+
!(

&'
9
@

'

8 62

9
#

= 3#

8
'

(
*(
!( ,
-(
.(
"(
-

!( 3

*B

66 : >

,,9?

88B

> ,,"? /
1

( 2
*( 3

'

#
,

,
4

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 17 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

scaterbone@live.com
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com
www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
http://www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST


STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination
and Anti-Trust Violations with False Statements to Authorities
September 27, 2015
Work-In-Progress

Community Stalking and Organized Libel/Slander Campaign Strategy Issue a few every
year to support false arrests; false imprisonment; fabricated mental illness history. In addition to
isolate by prohibiting entrance to major entertainment venues with good live music. Prohibit from
defending against the lies and slander in public to a minimum. Also, destroy history of strong
Christian values and church attendance on a weekly basis by keeping away from church. The
Millersville University Graduate Studies No Trespass Notice was accommodated by the denial of
entitled benefits of LETA Job Training Education Course of the Paralegal program at HACC during
the same time period.

1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm Served by State Constable in June of


2005, original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner Sent via 1st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing
Fulton Bank in 2006 Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City
Police in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley,
and Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by
Lori Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 18 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice


15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19.Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
20. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police
Chief Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President,
Debra Hoeckler
21.Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
22.Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
23.Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
24.Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain
regarding harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.

Dated: September 27, 2015

Third Circuit 15-3400


:ELMI-21179 - CHR
~

Page 19 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015


PhGE 1 OF 3

10/07/05 02:51:37 - 10/07/05 02:51:37 BTKTNBAKZFJY

..

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE CENTRAL REPOSITORY


1800 ELMERTON AVENUE HARRISBURG, PENNSYLVANIA 17110 717-787-9092
:TN: BEZZARD

ORIr PA0364001 EAST LAMPETER TWP PD

ISE OF THE FOLLOWING CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD FOR * * * SID/178-78-81-6 * * *


ZEGULATED BY ACT 47, AS AMENDED. * " * I11 - SINGLE STATE OFFENDER **'
~--..----22--------------------------------------------------------------------

bB: 07/15/1958

SEX: M

RAC: W

SOC: 200-46-0959

FBI: 508174HA2

W E : CATERBONE,STANLEY J
OTN: 8384566-0
?RESTED: 09/04/1987 PA0360800 MANHEIM TWP PD
[SPOSITION DATE: 03/14/1988 COMMON PLEAS DOCKET: 198187-

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 2 of 28

OCA: 3930

05.07.2007

BTKTNBAXZFJY
Third Circuit
15-3400
Thursday, November 19, 2015
9/03/1987
CC3304A2
CRIMINAL MISCHIEF -Page
F3 20 of 231
9,'03/1987 CC3502
BURGLARY - F1
QUASHED/DISMIS/DEMr;R SUS
3/07/1981 CC3101A1 ROBBERY - F1
QUASHED/DISMIS/DEMUR SUS
9/03/1987 CC3921A THEFT BY UNLWF TAKING OR DISPO NOLLE PROSSED/WITHDRAWN
4N:

W E : CATERBONE,STANLEY J
OTN: L260045-2
?RESTED: 10/06/2005 PA0364000 EAST LAMPETER TWP PD
)/06/2005

CC2709A7 HARASSMEW

M3

OCA: 05-355
DISPOSITION UNREPORTED

I++++++++++++++tt++++++++++++++++++++++4l.i+it+t+++++ti++++t++++++++++++++t++t+

<<<<<<<<<<<

ADDITIONAL IDENTIFIERS >>>>>>>>>>>

* * CPIN PHOTO ON FILE **'


=

FELONY, M

MISDEMEANOR, S

SUMMARY AND THE NUMERIC

THE DEGREE

<IS RESPONSE IS BASED ON REQUESTER FURNISHED INSORMATION AND INCLUDES

LNGERPR.INT SUPPORTED DATA EXCLUSIVELY FROM THE FILES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA


PATE POLICE REPOSITORY.-.-ITDOES NOT PRECLUDE THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 3 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 21 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-3-01

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: NT-0000460-05

Non-Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE, STANLEY J
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

EAST LAMPETER TWP, POLICE DEPT


BEZZARD, RONALD S
P4985908-4
LANCASTER
EAST LAMPETER TWP

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STANLEY J
07/15/1954

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

10/06/2005
10/11/2005
Withdrawn
12/05/2005
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

CONESTOGA, PA 17516
Male
White

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 18 5503 A2

DISORDERLY CONDUCT-UNREASONABLE NOISE SUMMARY

Withdrawn (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

11/17/2005
12/05/2005

Summary Trial
Summary Trial

CONT
WD

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: BEZZARD, RONALD S

1200

Address:

EAST LAMPETER TWP PD


2250 OLD PHILADELPHIA PIKE
LANCASTER, PA 17602

Printed: 04/06/2007 12:20 pm

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
4 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 22 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-3-01

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: NT-0000459-05

Non-Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE, STANLEY J
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

EAST LAMPETER TWP, POLICE DEPT


BEZZARD, RONALD S
P4985907-3
LANCASTER
EAST LAMPETER TWP

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STANLEY J
07/15/1954

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

10/06/2005
10/11/2005
Withdrawn
12/05/2005
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

CONESTOGA, PA 17516
Male
White

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 18 3926 A4

THEFT OF SERVICES-ACQUISITION OF SERVICES

Withdrawn (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

11/17/2005
12/05/2005

Summary Trial
Summary Trial

CONT
WD

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: BEZZARD, RONALD S

1200

Address:

EAST LAMPETER TWP PD


2250 OLD PHILADELPHIA PIKE
LANCASTER, PA 17602

Printed: 04/06/2007 12:23 pm

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
5 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 23 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-3-01

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: CR-0000263-05

Criminal Docket
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE, STANLEY J
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

L 260045-2
EAST LAMPETER TWP, POLICE DEPT
BEZZARD, RONALD S
LANCASTER
EAST LAMPETER TWP

10/17/2005
10/18/2005
Withdrawn
12/05/2005
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STANLEY J
07/15/1954

Address:
Sex:
Race:

CONESTOGA, PA 17516
Male
White

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 18 2709 A7

HARASSMENT - COMM. REPEATEDLY IN ANOTHER MANNER

Withdrawn (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

11/17/2005
12/05/2005

Preliminary Hearing
Preliminary Hearing

CONT
WD

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

10/31/2005

SUMMONS ACCEPTED

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: BEZZARD, RONALD S

1200

Address:

EAST LAMPETER TWP PD


2250 OLD PHILADELPHIA PIKE
LANCASTER, PA 17602

Printed: 04/06/2007 12:18 pm

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
6 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 24 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-04

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: TR-0003557-06

Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE,STAN
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

SIMMS, RICHARD H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STAN

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

LANCASTER, POLICE DEPT


GJURICH, THOMAS
F2520306-5
LANCASTER
LANCASTER CITY

02/10/2006
04/28/2006
Withdrawn
01/23/2007
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

CONESTOGA, PA 17516

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 285-21D

NO PARKING OR STOPPING PERMITTED

Withdrawn (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

06/19/2006
08/04/2006
10/05/2006
10/05/2006

Summary Trial
Summary Trial
Summary Trial
Summary Trial

CONT
CONT
GT

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

04/28/2006

SUMMONS ISSUED

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: GJURICH, THOMAS

Address:

LANCASTER CITY PD
39 W CHESTNUT ST
LANCASTER, PA 17603

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-04-BW-0310495-2006

Bench

Cancelled

1/11/2007

1200

Printed: 04/06/2007 11:44 am

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
7 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 25 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-04

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: TR-0004428-06

Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE,STAN
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

SIMMS, RICHARD H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STAN

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

LANCASTER, POLICE DEPT


GJURICH, THOMAS
F2522147-5
LANCASTER
LANCASTER CITY

04/03/2006
05/26/2006
Withdrawn
01/23/2007
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

CONESTOGA, PA 17516

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 285-30A

METER VIOLATION

Withdrawn (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

08/04/2006
10/05/2006
10/05/2006

Summary Trial
Summary Trial
Summary Trial

CONT
GT

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

05/26/2006
06/23/2006

SUMMONS ISSUED
SUMMONS ACCEPTED

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: GJURICH, THOMAS

Address:

LANCASTER CITY PD
39 W CHESTNUT ST
LANCASTER, PA 17603

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-04-BW-0310500-2006

Bench

Cancelled

1/11/2007

1200

Printed: 04/06/2007 11:39 am

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
8 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 26 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-04

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: NT-0000598-06

Non-Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE, STANLEY J
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

SIMMS, RICHARD H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STANLEY J
07/15/1958

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

LANCASTER, POLICE DEPT


HERSHISER, DAVID K
P5612199-5
LANCASTER
LANCASTER CITY

04/16/2006
04/25/2006
Dismissed
01/23/2007
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

CONESTOGA, PA 17516
Male
White

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 18 6501 A1

SCATTER RUBBISH UPON LAND/STREAM ETC

Dismissed (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

06/19/2006
08/04/2006
10/05/2006
01/23/2007

Summary Trial
Summary Trial
Summary Trial
Summary Trial

CONT
GT
DIS

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: HERSHISER, DAVID K

Address:

LANCASTER CITY PD
39 W CHESTNUT ST
LANCASTER, PA 17602

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-04-BW-0310486-2006

Bench

Cancelled

1/9/2007

1200

Printed: 04/06/2007 11:36 am

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
9 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 27 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-04

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: TR-0008578-06

Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PA
v.
CATERBONE, STAN
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

SIMMS, RICHARD H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STAN

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

LANCASTER, POLICE DEPT


GJURICH, THOMAS
F2531888-2
LANCASTER
LANCASTER CITY

08/04/2006
10/16/2006
Withdrawn
01/23/2007
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

LANCASTER, PA 17603
Unknown
Unknown

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 285-21D

NO PARKING OR STOPPING PERMITTED

Withdrawn (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

01/23/2007
01/23/2007

Summary Trial
Summary Trial

WD

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

10/16/2006
12/06/2006

SUMMONS ISSUED
SUMMONS UNDELIVERABLE

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: GJURICH, THOMAS

Address:

LANCASTER CITY PD
39 W CHESTNUT ST
LANCASTER, PA 17603

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-04-AW-0000014-2007

Arrest

Served

1/9/2007

1200

Printed: 04/04/2007 10:32 am

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
10 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 28 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-04

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: TR-0008735-06

Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PA
v.
CATERBONE, STAN
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

SIMMS, RICHARD H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STAN

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

LANCASTER, POLICE DEPT


GJURICH, THOMAS
F2532089-0
LANCASTER
LANCASTER CITY

08/29/2006
10/25/2006
Withdrawn
01/23/2007
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

LANCASTER, PA 17603
Unknown
Unknown

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 285-30A

METER VIOLATION

Withdrawn (Lower Court)

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

01/23/2007

Summary Trial

WD

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

10/25/2006
12/15/2006

SUMMONS ISSUED
SUMMONS REJECTED

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: GJURICH, THOMAS

Address:

LANCASTER CITY PD
39 W CHESTNUT ST
LANCASTER, PA 17603

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-04-AW-0327716-2006

Arrest

Served

1/9/2007

1200

Printed: 04/04/2007 10:28 am

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
11 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 29 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-04

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: TR-0007528-06

Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE, STAN
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
DEPT
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

SIMMS, RICHARD H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STAN
07/15/1958

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

LANCASTER CNTY SHER, POLICE


WILLCOX, JOSEPH
B0826408-2
LANCASTER
LANCASTER CITY

08/30/2006
09/13/2006

$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

LANCASTER, PA 17603
Male

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 75 1543 A

DRIVING WHILE OPER PRIV SUSPENDED OR REVOKED

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

03/06/2007
03/06/2007
04/11/2007

Summary Trial
Summary Trial
Summary Trial

CONT
CONT

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

09/18/2006
11/09/2006

SUMMONS ISSUED
SUMMONS REJECTED

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: WILLCOX, JOSEPH

Address:

LANCASTER CNTY SHERIFF'S


50 N DUKE ST
LANCASTER, PA 17602

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-04-AW-0237058-2006

Arrest

Cancelled

1/9/2007

1200

Printed: 04/04/2007 10:34 am

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
12 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 30 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-06

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: TR-0002184-06

Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE, STANLEY JAY
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

ECKERT, JR, LEO H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STANLEY JAY


07/15/1958

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

MILLERSVILLE BORO, POLICE DEPT


SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL K
B3003269-3
LANCASTER
MILLERSVILLE BORO

09/05/2006
09/05/2006
Not Guilty
01/18/2007
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

LANCASTER, PA 17602
Male
White

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 75 1543 A

DRIV WHILE OPER PRIV SUSP OR REVOKED

Not Guilty

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

01/18/2007

Summary Trial

NG

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

09/06/2006
10/13/2006

SUMMONS ISSUED
SUMMONS UNDELIVERABLE

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL K

Address:

MILLERSVILLE BORO PD
10 COLONIAL RD
MILLERSVILLE, PA 17551

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-06-BW-0165735-2006

Bench

Served

10/30/2006

1200

Printed: 04/03/2007 4:48 pm

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
13 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 31 of 231

Magisterial District Judge 02-2-06

Thursday, November 19, 2015

DOCKET

Docket Number: TR-0002183-06

Traffic Citation Docket


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
v.
CATERBONE, STANLEY JAY
Page 1 of 1

CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned:
OTN:
Arresting Agency:
Arresting Officer:
Citation #:
County:
Township:

ECKERT, JR, LEO H

Name:
Date Of Birth:

CATERBONE, STANLEY JAY


07/15/1958

Issue Date:
File Date:
Case Disp:
Disp Date:
Requested:
Judgment:

MILLERSVILLE BORO, POLICE DEPT


SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL K
B3003268-2
LANCASTER
MILLERSVILLE BORO

09/05/2006
09/05/2006
Not Guilty
01/18/2007
$0.00

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Address:
Sex:
Race:

LANCASTER, PA 17602
Male
White

CHARGES
# Charge

Description

Disposition

1 75 1786 F

OPER VEH W/O REQ'D FINANC RESP

Not Guilty

CALENDAR
Schedule Date

Event Type

Status

01/18/2007

Summary Trial

NG

CASE ACCOUNTING
Total Due:
Total Paid:

$0.00
$0.00

Total Adj:
Balance:

$0.00
$0.00

SUMMONS
Summons Date

Summons Action

09/06/2006
10/13/2006

SUMMONS ISSUED
SUMMONS UNDELIVERABLE

AFFIANT INFORMATION
Name: SCHAEFFER, MICHAEL K

Address:

MILLERSVILLE BORO PD
10 COLONIAL RD
MILLERSVILLE, PA 17551

WARRANT
Number

Type

Status

Status Date

02-2-06-BW-0165732-2006

Bench

Served

10/30/2006

1200

Printed: 04/03/2007 4:50 pm

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section
9101 et seq.)
mayGROUP
be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section
ADVANCED
MEDIA
Page9183.
14 of 28
05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 32 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Non-Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone

Page 1 of 6

CASE INFORMATION
Cross Court Docket Nos: NT-0000561-06, NT-0000562-06, NT-0000569-06
Judge Assigned:

Date Filed: 01/22/2007

OTN:

Lower Court Docket No: NT-0000561-06

Initiation Date: 01/22/2007

Initial Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Agency: Southern Regional Police Dept
Case Local Number Type(s)

Final Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Officer: Michener, John R.
Case Local Number(s)

Judge Assigned:

Date Filed: 01/22/2007

OTN:

Lower Court Docket No: NT-0000562-06

Initial Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Agency: Southern Regional Police Dept
Case Local Number Type(s)

Final Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Officer: Michener, John R.
Case Local Number(s)

Judge Assigned:

Date Filed: 01/22/2007

OTN:

Lower Court Docket No: NT-0000569-06

Initial Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Agency: Southern Regional Police Dept
Case Local Number Type(s)

Final Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Officer: Michener, John R.
Case Local Number(s)

Initiation Date: 01/22/2007

Initiation Date: 01/22/2007

STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:

Closed

Processing Status:

Awaiting Original Papers


Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Completed
Sentenced/Penalty Imposed

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:

07/15/1958

City/State/Zip: Lancaster, PA 17602

Alias Name
Caterbone, Stanley J.
Caterbone, Stanley Joseph
AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 15 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 33 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Non-Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone

Page 2 of 6

CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Defendant

Name
Caterbone, Stanley Jay

CHARGES

Sequence

Grade

Section/ Description

Statute Description

Offense
Date

18 5503 A4

Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off

08/05/2006

18 5507 A

Obstruction Highways

08/05/2006

18 2709 A3

Harassment - Course of Conduct W/No


Legitimate Purpose

08/10/2006

2
3

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

OTN

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 16 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 34 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Non-Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone

Page 3 of 6

DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Credit For Time Served
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Start Date

Lower Court Proceeding (generic)

Lower Court Disposition

01/22/2007

Not Final

04/30/2007

Final Disposition

Not Guilty

Summary Appeal Trial


1 / Disorder Conduct Hazardous/Physi Off
Reinaker, Dennis E.

Not Guilty
04/30/2007

18 5503 A4

2 / Obstruction Highways
Reinaker, Dennis E.

Not Guilty
04/30/2007

18 5507 A

3 / Harassment - Course of Conduct W/No


Legitimate Purpose
Reinaker, Dennis E.

Nolle Prossed

18 2709 A3

04/30/2007

COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION

ATTORNEY INFORMATION

Name:

Name:

Supreme Court No:

Supreme Court No:


Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 17 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 35 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Non-Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone

Page 4 of 6

ENTRIES
Document/Sequence

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

Title
Comments
Issue Date

Service Type

Status Date

Service To
Registry Entry
1

Service By

01/22/2007
Notice of Summary Appeal Filed
01/23/2007
Office Mailbox
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
01/23/2007
First Class
Eckert, Leo H. Jr.
01/23/2007
First Class
Michener, John R.

Service Status

Caterbone, Stanley Jay

03/22/2007

Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster County

Hearing Notice
03/22/2007
Certified
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
03/22/2007
Hand Delivered
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
1

04/04/2007
Motion for Continuance

Caterbone, Stanley Jay

Sent Motion to Business Judge Paul K. Allison

04/04/2007
Order Denying Motion for Continuance
04/05/2007
First Class
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
04/05/2007
Rounds
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

04/04/2007

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Allison, Paul K.

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 18 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 36 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Non-Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone

Page 5 of 6

ENTRIES
Document/Sequence

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

Title
Comments
Issue Date

Service Type

Status Date

Service To
Registry Entry
1

Service Status

Service By

04/30/2007

Reinaker, Dennis E.

Not Guilty

04/30/2007
Order - Sentence/Penalty Imposed

Reinaker, Dennis E.

CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Last Payment Date:

Caterbone, Stanley Jay


Defendant

Total of Last Payment: $0.00

Assessment

Payments

Adjustments

Non Monetary
Payments

Total

Server Fees

$86.40

$0.00

($86.40)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$86.40

$0.00

($86.40)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$83.90

$0.00

($83.90)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$83.90

$0.00

($83.90)

$0.00

$0.00

$5.00

$0.00

($5.00)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$27.50

$0.00

($27.50)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$27.50

$0.00

($27.50)

$0.00

$0.00

Costs/Fees

Constable Education Training Act (Act


44 of 1991)

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 19 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 37 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000028-2007

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Non-Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley Jay Caterbone
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
Defendant

Page 6 of 6

Assessment

Payments

Adjustments

Non Monetary
Payments

Total

Server Fees

$25.00

$0.00

($25.00)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$25.00

$0.00

($25.00)

$0.00

$0.00

$5.00

$0.00

($5.00)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$27.50

$0.00

($27.50)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$27.50

$0.00

($27.50)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$25.00

$0.00

($25.00)

$0.00

$0.00

Server Fees

$25.00

$0.00

($25.00)

$0.00

$0.00

Constable Education Training Act (Act


44 of 1991)

$5.00

$0.00

($5.00)

$0.00

$0.00

Clerk of Court Auto


Fee-Filing-6593AAB1211 (Lan)

$5.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$5.00

Costs/Fees Totals:

$570.60

$0.00

($565.60)

$0.00

$5.00

Grand Totals:

$570.60

$0.00

($565.60)

$0.00

$5.00

Constable Education Training Act (Act


44 of 1991)

** - Indicates assessment is subrogated

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 20 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 38 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone

Page 1 of 8

CASE INFORMATION
Cross Court Docket Nos: TR-0000244-06, TR-0000245-06
Judge Assigned:

Date Filed: 07/12/2006

OTN:

Lower Court Docket No: TR-0000244-06

Initiation Date: 07/12/2006

Initial Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Agency: Southern Regional Police Dept
Case Local Number Type(s)

Final Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Officer: Burger, Robert Paul
Case Local Number(s)

Judge Assigned:

Date Filed: 07/12/2006

OTN:

Lower Court Docket No: TR-0000245-06

Initial Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Agency: Southern Regional Police Dept
Case Local Number Type(s)

Final Issuing Authority: Leo H Eckert Jr.


Arresting Officer: Burger, Robert Paul
Case Local Number(s)

Initiation Date: 07/12/2006

STATUS INFORMATION
Case Status:

Closed

Processing Status:

Awaiting Original Papers


Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Awaiting Summary Appeal Trial
Completed
Sentenced/Penalty Imposed

DEFENDANT INFORMATION
Date Of Birth:

07/15/1958

City/State/Zip: LANCASTER, PA 17603

Alias Name
Caterbone, Stanley Jay
Caterbone, Stanley Joseph

CASE PARTICIPANTS
Participant Type
Defendant

Name
Caterbone, Stanley J.

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 21 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 39 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone

Page 2 of 8

CHARGES

Sequence

Grade

Section/ Description

Statute Description

Offense
Date

75 3111 A

Disregard Traffic Control Device

02/05/2006

75 4703 A

Operat Veh W/O Valid Inspect

02/05/2006

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

OTN

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 22 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 40 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone

Page 3 of 8

DISPOSITION SENTENCING/PENALTIES
Disposition
Case Event
Sequence/Description
Sentencing Judge
Sentence/Diversion Program Type

Disposition Date
Final Disposition
Section
Offense Disposition
Sentence Date
Credit For Time Served
Incarceration/Diversionary Period
Start Date

Lower Court Proceeding (generic)

Lower Court Disposition


1 / Disregard Traffic Control Device
Eckert, Leo H. Jr.
2 / Operat Veh W/O Valid Inspect
Eckert, Leo H. Jr.

06/09/2006

Not Final

Guilty by Trial (Lower


Court)
07/12/2006

75 3111 A

Guilty by Trial (Lower


Court)
07/12/2006

75 4703 A

Not Guilty

Summary Appeal Trial

04/30/2007

Final Disposition

1 / Disregard Traffic Control Device


Reinaker, Dennis E.

Not Guilty
04/30/2007

75 3111 A

2 / Operat Veh W/O Valid Inspect


Reinaker, Dennis E.

Guilty
04/30/2007

75 4703 A

COMMONWEALTH INFORMATION

ATTORNEY INFORMATION

Name:

Name:

Supreme Court No:

Supreme Court No:


Counsel Status:
Phone Number(s):

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 23 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 41 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone

Page 4 of 8

ENTRIES
Document/Sequence

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

Title
Comments
Issue Date

Service Type

Service To
Registry Entry
1

Status Date
Service By

07/12/2006
Notice of Summary Appeal Filed
07/14/2006
First Class
Burger, Robert Paul
07/14/2006
Office Mailbox
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
07/14/2006
First Class
Miller, David P.

Service Status

Caterbone, Stanley J.

11/08/2006

Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster County

Hearing Notice
11/08/2006
Certified
Caterbone, Stanley J.
11/08/2006
Hand Delivered
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
1

11/14/2006
Motion for Continuance
11/20/2006
Rounds
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Caterbone, Stanley J.

11/27/2006
Motio for Continuance Denied without prejudice

Cullen, James P.

12/05/2006
Motion for Continuance
12/06/2006
Interoffice

Caterbone, Stanley J.

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 24 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 42 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone

Page 5 of 8

ENTRIES
Document/Sequence

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

Title
Comments
Issue Date

Service Type

Status Date

Service To
Registry Entry

Service Status

Service By

Caterbone, Stanley J.
12/06/2006
Rounds
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
1

12/22/2006

Caterbone, Stanley J.

Motion for Transcripts

01/04/2007
Notice of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc
01/03/2007
First Class
Caterbone, Stanley J.
01/03/2007
Rounds
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Caterbone, Stanley J.

01/05/2007

Reinaker, Dennis E.

Order of the Court

01/18/2007
01/17/2007
Concise Statement Order
01/19/2007
First Class
Caterbone, Stanley J.
01/19/2007
Rounds
Lancaster County District Attorney's Office

Reinaker, Dennis E.

01/19/2007
Hearing Notice
01/19/2007
Certified
Caterbone, Stanley J.

Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster County

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 25 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 43 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone

Page 6 of 8

ENTRIES
Document/Sequence

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

Title
Comments
Issue Date

Service Type

Service To
Registry Entry

Status Date

Service Status

Service By

01/19/2007
Hand Delivered
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
2

01/19/2007
01/19/2007
Court Order of 1/17/07 is Rescinded,Pet to Proceed IFP is Denied
01/19/2007
First Class
Caterbone, Stanley J.
01/19/2007
Rounds
Lancaster County District Attorney's Office

Reinaker, Dennis E.

02/15/2007
Motion for Continuance

Caterbone, Stanley J.

02/22/2007
Order Granting Motion for Continuance

Perezous, Michael J.

03/22/2007

Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster County

Hearing Notice
03/22/2007
Certified
Caterbone, Stanley J.
03/22/2007
Hand Delivered
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
1

04/04/2007
Motion for Continuance

Caterbone, Stanley J.

Sent Motion to Business Judge Paul K. Allison

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 26 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 44 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone

Page 7 of 8

ENTRIES
Document/Sequence

CP Filed Date

Document Date

Filed By

Title
Comments
Issue Date

Service Type

Status Date

Service To
Registry Entry
2

Service By

04/04/2007
Order Denying Motion for Continuance
04/05/2007
First Class
Caterbone, Stanley J.
04/05/2007
Rounds
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Service Status

04/04/2007

Allison, Paul K.

04/30/2007

Reinaker, Dennis E.

Not Guilty

04/30/2007
Order - Sentence/Penalty Imposed

Reinaker, Dennis E.

05/03/2007

Court of Common Pleas - Lancaster County

Penalty Assessed

CASE FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Last Payment Date:

Caterbone, Stanley J.
Defendant

Total of Last Payment: $0.00

Assessment

Payments

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Adjustments

Non Monetary
Payments

Total
Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 27 of 28

05.07.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 45 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY


DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-36-SA-0000159-2006

SUMMARY APPEAL DOCKET


Traffic
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Stanley J. Caterbone
Caterbone, Stanley J.
Defendant

Page 8 of 8

Assessment

Payments

Adjustments

Non Monetary
Payments

Total

Clerk of Court Auto


Fee-Filing-6593AAB1211 (Lan)

$5.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$5.00

State Court Cost (Act 204 of 1976)

$6.95

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$6.95

Commonwealth Cost - HB627 (Act 167


of 1992)

$6.95

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$6.95

County Court Costs (Act 204 of 1976)

$17.60

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$17.60

Emergency Medical Services (Act 45


of 1985)

$10.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$10.00

JCP

$8.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$8.00

ATJ

$2.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$2.00

CAT/MCARE (Act 13 of 2002)

$30.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$30.00

DA Administration Fee 6421AB130019021 (Lan)

$25.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$25.00

Clerk Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211


(Lancaster)

$24.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$24.00

DA Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211


(Lancaster)

$10.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$10.00

Sheriff Cost - Summary - 6411AB1211


(Lancaster)

$2.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$2.00

Costs of Transportation (Act 143-2006)

$6.96

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$6.96

Constable/Postage - 6411AB1211
(Lancaster)

$1.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$1.00

$155.46

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$155.46

Title 75, Motor Vehicle

$12.50

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$12.50

Title 75, Motor Vehicle

$12.50

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$12.50

Fines Totals:

$25.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$25.00

Grand Totals:

$180.46

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$180.46

Costs/Fees

Costs/Fees Totals:
Fines

** - Indicates assessment is subrogated

AOPC 2220 - Rev 05/04/2007

Printed: 05/04/2007

Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the Court of Common Pleas nor the
Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assume any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or omissions on these docket sheets. Docket
Sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check which can only be provided by the Pennsylvania State Police.
Moreover an employer who does not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act may be subject to civil liability as set
forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 28 of 28

05.07.2007

Police Misconduct and Civil Rights - Findlaw for the Public Third Circuit 15-3400

http://public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/more-civil-rights-topics/police-mis.
Page 46 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

FindLaw | For the Public | For Small Business | For Legal Professionals | Find a Lawyer

Overview

Race
Discrimination

Browse Civil Rights

Gender
Discrimination

Disability
Discrimination

Employment
Discrimination

Search Public

Housing
Enforcement
Discrimination

More
Topics

Laws and
Resources

FindLaw > Public > Civil Rights > More Topics


My current location: Lancaster, PA | Change location

Overview
Race Discrimination
Gender Discrimination
Disability
Discrimination
Employment
Discrimination
Housing Discrimination
Enforcement
More Topics
Age Discrimination
American Indians &
Alaska Natives
Citizens and the
Police
Civil Liberties
Credit / Lending
Discrimination
Criminal Civil Rights
Violations
Disaster Victims and
Civil Rights
Education and
Discrimination
Sexual Orientation
Discrimination
Hate Crimes
HIV / AIDS Patients
Immigrants
Institutionalized
Persons
Medical Patients
National Origin
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Public
Accommodations
Rights
Religious
Discrimination
Sexual Harassment
Laws and Resources
Find A Lawyer
Select type of practice:

Civil Rights

Enter City or Zip:

Lancaster
Pennsylvania

Featured Attorneys

FindLaw Lawyer Directory


Search FindLaw's database of 1,000,000 lawyers to find attorneys in your area.

Police Misconduct and Civil Rights


Police officers generally have broad powers to carry out their duties. The Constitution and
other laws, however, place limits on how far police can go in trying to enforce the law. As
the videotaped beating of motorist Rodney King, in Los Angeles and several recent cases in
New York have illustrated, police officers sometimes go too far, violating the rights of
citizens. When this happens, the victim of the misconduct may have recourse through
federal and state laws. A primary purpose of the nation's civil rights laws is to protect
citizens from abuses by government, including police misconduct. Civil rights laws allow
attorney fees and compensatory and punitive damages as incentives for injured parties to
enforce their rights.
Overcoming Immunity
Being stopped and questioned by police in connection with a crime is an unsettling
experience for most anyone. As long as the officer is performing his job properly, however,
there is no violation of a suspect's rights. In fact, police are immune from suit for the
performance of their jobs unless willful, unreasonable conduct is demonstrated. Mere
negligence, the failure to exercise due care, is not enough to create liability. Immunity
therefore means that in the typical police-suspect interaction, the suspect cannot sue the
police. Civil rights remedies come into play for willful police conduct that violates an
individual's constitutional rights.
Civil Rights Laws and Police Misconduct
A statute known as Section 1983 is the primary civil rights law victims of police
misconduct rely upon. This law was originally passed as part of the Civil Rights Act of
1871, which was intended to curb oppressive conduct by government and private
individuals participating in vigilante groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan. It is now called
Section 1983 because that is where the law has been published, within Title 42, of the
United States Code. Section 1983 makes it unlawful for anyone acting under the authority
of state law to deprive another person of his or her rights under the Constitution or federal
law. The most common claims brought against police officers are false arrest (or false
imprisonment), malicious prosecution, and use of excessive or unreasonable force.
Page 1 of 3 Next Page

Find
Browse Lawyers by State

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

More Sponsored Services

Page 14 of 16

04.07.2007

Police Misconduct and Civil Rights - Findlaw for the Public Third Circuit 15-3400

http://public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/more-civil-rights-topics/police-mis..
Page 47 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

FindLaw | For the Public | For Small Business | For Legal Professionals | Find a Lawyer

Overview

Race
Discrimination

Browse Civil Rights

Gender
Discrimination

Disability
Discrimination

Employment
Discrimination

Search Public

Housing
Enforcement
Discrimination

More
Topics

Laws and
Resources

FindLaw > Public > Civil Rights > More Topics


My current location: Lancaster, PA | Change location

Overview
Race Discrimination
Gender Discrimination
Disability
Discrimination
Employment
Discrimination
Housing Discrimination
Enforcement
More Topics
Age Discrimination
American Indians &
Alaska Natives
Citizens and the
Police
Civil Liberties
Credit / Lending
Discrimination
Criminal Civil Rights
Violations
Disaster Victims and
Civil Rights
Education and
Discrimination
Sexual Orientation
Discrimination
Hate Crimes
HIV / AIDS Patients
Immigrants
Institutionalized
Persons
Medical Patients
National Origin
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Public
Accommodations
Rights
Religious
Discrimination
Sexual Harassment
Laws and Resources
Find A Lawyer
Select type of practice:

Civil Rights

Enter City or Zip:

Featured Attorneys

FindLaw Lawyer Directory


Search FindLaw's database of 1,000,000 lawyers to find attorneys in your area.

Police Misconduct and Civil Rights


False Arrest
The claim that is most often asserted against police is false arrest. Persons bringing this
claim assert that police violated their Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable
seizure. If the officer had probable cause to believe the individual had committed a crime,
the arrest is reasonable and the Fourth Amendment has not been violated. Police can arrest
without a warrant for a felony or misdemeanor committed in their presence. (Some states
also allow warrantless arrests for misdemeanor domestic assaults not committed in the
officer's presence.) Even if the information the officer relied upon later turns out to be false,
the officer is not liable if he believed it was accurate at the time of the arrest. To prevail on
a false arrest claim, the victim must show that the arresting officer lacked probable cause,
that is, facts sufficient to cause a reasonable person to believe that a crime had been
committed.
Malicious Prosecution
A malicious prosecution claim asserts that the officer wrongly deprived the victim of the
Fourteenth Amendment right to liberty. To win this type of claim, the victim must show
four things: 1) the defendant police officer commenced a criminal proceeding; 2) the
proceeding ended in the victim's favor (that is, no conviction); 3) there was no probable
cause; and 4) the proceeding was brought with malice toward the victim. As with false
arrest, this claim will fail if the officer had probable cause to initiate criminal proceedings.
Excessive Force
Excessive force claims receive the most publicity, perhaps because the results of excessive
force seem the most outrageous, involving serious physical injury or death. Whether the
officer's use of force was reasonable depends on the surrounding facts and circumstances.
The officer's intentions or motivations are not controlling. If the amount of force was
reasonable, it doesn't matter that the officer's intentions were bad. But the reverse is also
true: if the officer had good intentions, but used unreasonable force, the excessive force
claim will not be dismissed.
Page 2 of 3 Prev Page Next Page

Lancaster
Pennsylvania

Find

More Sponsored Services


Wills, Divorce, Incorporation & More: Fast and friendly service from LegalZoom, the #1 online legal document service.

Browse Lawyers by State

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 15 of 16

04.07.2007

Police Misconduct and Civil Rights - Findlaw for the Public Third Circuit 15-3400

http://public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/more-civil-rights-topics/police-mis...
Page 48 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

FindLaw | For the Public | For Small Business | For Legal Professionals | Find a Lawyer

Overview

Race
Discrimination

Browse Civil Rights

Gender
Discrimination

Disability
Discrimination

Employment
Discrimination

Housing
Enforcement
Discrimination

Search Public

More
Topics

Laws and
Resources

FindLaw > Public > Civil Rights > More Topics


My current location: Lancaster, PA | Change location

Overview
Race Discrimination
Gender Discrimination
Disability
Discrimination
Employment
Discrimination
Housing Discrimination
Enforcement
More Topics
Age Discrimination
American Indians &
Alaska Natives
Citizens and the
Police
Civil Liberties
Credit / Lending
Discrimination
Criminal Civil Rights
Violations
Disaster Victims and
Civil Rights
Education and
Discrimination
Sexual Orientation
Discrimination
Hate Crimes
HIV / AIDS Patients
Immigrants
Institutionalized
Persons
Medical Patients
National Origin
Discrimination
Police Misconduct
Public
Accommodations
Rights
Religious
Discrimination
Sexual Harassment
Laws and Resources
Find A Lawyer
Select type of practice:

Civil Rights

Enter City or Zip:

Lancaster
Pennsylvania

Featured Attorneys

FindLaw Lawyer Directory


Search FindLaw's database of 1,000,000 lawyers to find attorneys in your area.

Police Misconduct and Civil Rights


Failure to Intervene
Officers have a duty to protect individuals from constitutional violations by fellow officers.
Therefore, an officer who witnesses a fellow officer violating an individual's constitutional
rights may be liable to the victim for failing to intervene.
The Qualified Immunity Defense
Defense attorneys representing a police officer for any of these claims will raise a defense
of qualified immunity. This defense exists to prevent the fear of legal prosecution from
inhibiting a police officer from enforcing the law. The defense will defeat a claim against
the officer if the officer's conduct did not violate a clearly established constitutional or
statutory right. In other words, the specific acts the officer prevented the individual from
engaging in must be legally protected, otherwise there is no civil rights violation. In order
to win a civil rights claim, an individual bringing a police misconduct claim must prove that
the actions of the police exceeded reasonable bounds, infringed the victim's constitutional
rights, and produced some injury or damages to the victim.
Police Misconduct: If You've Been Affected
Civil rights claims are an important part of our legal system, providing a balance between
the duty of law enforcement to uphold the laws, and the rights of individuals to be free from
police misconduct. Yet cases against police officers can be difficult. Officers may be
immune from suit, even though an individual feels he or she was mistreated. Claims against
police departments can also be expensive to bring because a lot of evidence must be
secured, including records, statements of police, statements of witnesses, and various other
documentation, to prove the misconduct.
The evidence supporting your claim is the most important element in a police misconduct
suit. If you feel you've been the victim of police misconduct, contact a Civil Rights
Attorney promptly so that valuable evidence does not disappear. Take photographs of any
injuries or damage caused by the police, and set aside clothing or other objects that was
torn or stained with blood from the incident. Try to get the names and addresses or
telephone numbers of anyone who may have witnessed the incident. Also, write down
exactly what happened as soon as you can, so that you don't forget important details.

Find
Browse Lawyers by State

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 3 of 3 Prev Page

Page 16 of 16

04.07.2007

Third Circuit Case:


15-340007-4475

Page 49 of 231Page: 1
Document: 00312120604

Thursday,
November 19, 2015
Date Filed:
10/22/2008

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 07-4474

STANLEY J. CATERBONE,

v.
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON; MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT;
STONE HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT; AVALON POLICE DEPARTMENT;
COMMONWEALTH NATIONAL BANK, i.e. Mellon Bank; SOUTH REGIONAL
POLICE DEPT.; LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.; FULTON BANK
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action No. 05-cv-2288)
District Judge: Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin
____________________________________

No. 07-4475

STANLEY J. CATERBONE; ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

v.
MR. RANDALL O. WENGER, of the Lancaster County Prothonetary;
MATTHEW BOMBERGER, Office of the Public Defender of
Lancaster County; JUDGE MICHAEL GEORGELIS, Lancaster County; LEO
J. ECKERT JR., Lancaster County District Magistrate; KELLY S.
BALLENTINE, Lancaster County District Magistrate; MAYNARD
HAMILTON, JR., Lancaster County District Magistrate; DENISE COMMINS,

Third Circuit Case:


15-340007-4475

Page 50 of 231Page: 2
Document: 00312120604

Thursday,
November 19, 2015
Date Filed:
10/22/2008

Lancaster County District Magistrate Judge; RICHARD H. SIMMS,


Lancaster County District Magistrate; STEVEN MYLIN, Lancaster County
District Magistrate; WILLIAM G. REUTER, Lancaster County
District Magistrate; MICHAEL SMITH, Dalphin County District Magistrate;
OFFICER RONALD BEZZARD, of the East Lampeter Police Department;
OFFICER THOMAS GJURICH, of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police;
OFFICER ADAM CRAMER, of the Southern Regional Police Dept.;
CHIEF JOHN FIORILL; OFFICER ROBERT BUSER, of the Southern Regional Police
Department; OFFICER ROBERT M. FEDOR, of the Southern Regional Police
Department; ROBERT BOURNE, of the Southern Regional Police Department;
JOLYNN STEINMAN, Postmaster, Conestoga Post Office; NELSON BREWSTER,
Investigator, of the PA Attorney General Office; OFFICER MICHAEL K.
SCHAEFER; LUIS FURINA; DONALD TOTARO, Lancaster County
District Attorney; DETECTIVE MICHAEL L. LANDIS, Lancaster County
Stanley J. Caterbone,
Appellant
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action No. 06-cv-04650)
District Judge: Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin
____________________________________
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
September 26, 2008
Before: SLOVITER, BARRY and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges
_______________________
JUDGMENT
_______________________

These causes came to be considered on the record from the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and were submitted pursuant to Third
Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on September 26, 2008. On consideration whereof, it is now hereby

Third Circuit Case:


15-340007-4475

Page 51 of 231Page: 3
Document: 00312120604

Thursday,
November 19, 2015
Date Filed:
10/22/2008

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgments of the District
Court entered on October 23, 2007, be and the same are hereby VACATED and the cases
are REMANDED for further proceedings. Costs will not be taxed. All of the above in
accordance with the opinion of this Court.

ATTEST:
/s/ Marcia M. Waldron
Clerk
DATED: September 30, 2008

Certified as a true copy and issued in lieu


of a formal mandate on 10/22/2008
Teste:
Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Third Circuit Case:


15-340007-4475

Page 52 of 231Page: 1
Document: 00312120622

Thursday,
November 19, 2015
Date Filed:
10/22/2008

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

MARCIA M. WALDRON

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

TELEPHONE

215-597-2995

21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE


601 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790

Website: www.ca3.uscourts.gov

October 22, 2008


Mr. Michael Kunz
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
James A. Byrne United States Courthouse
601 Market Street
Room 2609
Philadelphia, PA 19106-1797
RE: Caterbone v. Lancaster Cty Prison, et al
Case Number: 07-4474 & 07-4475
District Case Number: 05-cv-02288 & 06-cv-04650
Dear Mr. Kunz,
Enclosed herewith is the certified judgment together with copy of the opinion in the
above-captioned case(s). The certified judgment is issued in lieu of a formal mandate and is to be
treated in all respects as a mandate.
Counsel are advised of the issuance of the mandate by copy of this letter. The certified judgment
is also enclosed showing costs taxed, if any.
Very truly yours,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk


By: /s/Charlene L. Crisden, Case Manager/DWB
267-299-4923
cc:
Stephanie Carfley, Esq.
Robert W. Hallinger, Esq.
Christopher S. Underhill, Esq.

George M. Gowen III, Esq.


Lawrence D. Mason, Esq.
Stanley J. Caterbone

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania


Third Circuit 15-3400

1 of 6

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?885193309240359-L_1_0-1
Page 53 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

CLOSED,SPECIAL

United States District Court


Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:06-cv-04650-MAM

CATERBONE v. WENGER et al
Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
Case in other court: THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS,
07-04475
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Date Filed: 11/17/2006


Date Terminated: 10/23/2007
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff
STANLEY J. CATERBONE

represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE


1250 FREMONT STREET
CONESTOGA, PA 17603
PRO SE

Plaintiff
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
V.
Defendant
MR. RANDALL O. WENGER
OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY
PROTHONETARY
Defendant
MATTHEW MR. BOMBERGER
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER
OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Defendant
JUDGE MICHEAL GEORGELIS
LANCASTER COUNTY
Defendant
LEO J. ECKERT, JR.
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
Defendant
KELLY S. BALLENTINE, ESQ.
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT

8/13/2015 3:03 PM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania


Third Circuit 15-3400

2 of 6

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?885193309240359-L_1_0-1
Page 54 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

MAGISTRATE
Defendant
MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR.
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
Defendant
DENISE COMMINS
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendant
RICHARD H. SIMMS
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
Defendant
STEVEN MYLIN
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
Defendant
WILLIAM G. REUTER
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
Defendant
MICHAEL SMITH
DAULPHIN COUNTY DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
Defendant
OFFICER RONALD BEZZARD
OF THE EAST LAMPETER POLICE
DEPARTMENT
Defendant
OFFICER THOMAS GJURICH
OF THE LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF
POLICE
Defendant
OFFICER ADAM CRAMER
OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL
POLICE DEPT

8/13/2015 3:03 PM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania


Third Circuit 15-3400

3 of 6

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?885193309240359-L_1_0-1
Page 55 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

Defendant
CHIEF JOHN FIORILL
OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant
OFFICER ROBERT BUSER
OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant
ROBERT M. FEDOR
OF THE SOUTHERN REGIONAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant
SHERRIF ROBERT BOURNE
LANCASTER COUNTY, OF THE
LANCASTER SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Defendant
JOLYNN STEINMAN
POSTMASTER, CONESTOGA POST
OFFICE
Defendant
NELSON BREWSTER
INVESTIGATOR, OF THE PA ATTORNEY
GENERAL OFFICE
Defendant
OFFICER MICAHEL K. SCHAEFER
OF MILLERSVILLE BORO POLICE
Defendant
LUIS FURINA
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT JUDGE
Defendant
JUDGE MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT
Defendant
DONALD TOTARO
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY

8/13/2015 3:03 PM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania


Third Circuit 15-3400

4 of 6

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?885193309240359-L_1_0-1
Page 56 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

Defendant
MICAHEL DETECTIVE LANDIS
LANCASTER COUNTY

Date Filed

Docket Text

10/18/2006

1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by STANLEY J.


CATERBONE.AFFIDAVIT.(ks, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ).
(Entered: 10/19/2006)

11/15/2006

2 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE FILED BY STANLY J. CATERBONE.(gs)


Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered: 11/16/2006)

11/17/2006

3 ORDER THAT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS


GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL AMEND HIS
COMPLAINT SO AS TO PROVIDE A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT PURSUANT
TO F.R.C.P. 12(e). SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 11/16/2006.
11/17/2006 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (mbh, ) Additional attachment(s)
added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered: 11/17/2006)

11/17/2006

4 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THE


CLERK OF COURT MARK THIS ACTION CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL
PURPOSES AND PLACE THE MATTER IN THE CIVIL SUSPENSE FILE. SIGNED
BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 11/17/06. 11/20/06 ENTERED AND
COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 11/20/2006)

11/17/2006

5 Complaint against DEFENDANTS MAYNARD HAMILTON, JR, DENISE


COMMINS, RICHARD H. SIMMS, STEVEN MYLIN, WILLIAM G. REUTER,
MICHAEL SMITH, RONALD BEZZARD, THOMAS GJURICH, ADAM CRAMER,
JOHN FIORILL, ROBERT BUSER, ROBERT M. FEDOR, ROBERT BOURNE,
JOLYNN STEINMAN, NELSON BREWSTER, MICAHEL K. SCHAEFER, LUIS
FURINA, MICHAEL A. GEORGELIS, DONALD TOTARO, MICAHEL
DETECTIVE LANDIS, RANDALL O. WENGER, MATTHEW MR. BOMBERGER,
MICHEAL GEORGELIS, LEO J. ECKERT, JR and KELLY S. BALLENTINE, ESQ
filed by PLAINTIFFS ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP and STANLY J.
CATERBONE.(mbh, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered:
01/18/2007)

01/19/2007

6 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL


SUSPENSE UNTIL 4/19/07. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
1/19/07. 1/19/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 01/19/2007)

04/03/2007

7 ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT filed by STANLY J. CATERBONE. Cert. of Service.


(PRO SE) (pr, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2007 (mk, ). (Entered:
04/03/2007)

04/13/2007

8 STANLY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE (#50 in 06-cv4154).(fdc) (Entered: 04/13/2007)

8/13/2015 3:03 PM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania


Third Circuit 15-3400

5 of 6

04/16/2007

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?885193309240359-L_1_0-1
Page 57 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

9 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THIS


CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPSENSE UNTIL 6/19/07. SIGNED BY
JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/16/07.4/16/07 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED TO CATERBONE.(fdc) (Entered: 04/16/2007)

04/26/2007

10 ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EX PARTE MEETING IS


DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/25/07. 4/26/07
ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 04/26/2007)

05/07/2007

11 Addendum to Complaint by STANLY J. CATERBONE (#11 in 06-cv-4154). (fdc)


(Entered: 05/07/2007)

06/19/2007

12 STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE, CERTIFICATE OF


SERVICE (#12 in 06-4154).(fdc) Additional attachment(s) added on 6/19/2007 (ac, ).
(Entered: 06/19/2007)

06/20/2007

13 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE IS GRANTED. THIS


CASE SHALL REMAIN IN CIVIL SUSPENSE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT
THE PLAINTIFF SHALL INFORM THE COURT ON OR BEFORE 8/31/07 AS TO
THE STATUS OF THE CASE. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
6/19/07.6/20/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 06/20/2007)

08/10/2007

14 EXHIBITS by plff STANLY J. CATERBONE. (gn, ) (Entered: 08/10/2007)

09/04/2007

15 Status of Case by STANLY J. CATERBONE. (stb, ) (Entered: 09/04/2007)

09/12/2007

16 ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST DATED 8/30/07 TO FILE AN


AMENDED COMPLAINT ON 11/15/07, IS DENIED. THE PLAINTIFF MUST
SERVE THIS COMPLAINT ON OR BEFORE 10/15/07, OR THE CASE WILL BE
DISMISSED. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 9/11/07. 9/12/07
ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (Entered: 09/12/2007)

10/15/2007

17 STANLY J. CATERBONE'S Amendment to Complaint and Motion for Continuance,


Certificate of Service.(fdc) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

10/23/2007

18 ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A


CONTINUANCE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
10/22/07.10/23/07 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO CATERBONE.(fdc)
(Entered: 10/23/2007)

11/23/2007

19 NOTICE OF APPEAL by STANLY J. CATERBONE, Certificate of Service. (Filing


Fee: IFP Status) Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk. (kw, ) (Entered:
11/26/2007)

11/23/2007

20 Clerk's Notice to USCA re 19 Notice of Appeal. (kw, ) (Entered: 11/26/2007)

12/10/2007
10/20/2008

NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re 19 Notice of Appeal filed by


STANLY J. CATERBONE. USCA Case Number 07-4475 (jpd) (Entered: 12/10/2007)
21 STANLEY J. CATERBONE'S MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(fdc) (Entered: 10/20/2008)

8/13/2015 3:03 PM

United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania


Third Circuit 15-3400

6 of 6

https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?885193309240359-L_1_0-1
Page 58 of 231
Thursday, November 19, 2015

10/30/2008

22 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW IS GRANTED TO THE


EXTENT IT REQUESTS DISMISSAL OF THE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/30/08.10/30/08
ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO CATERBONE.(fdc) (Entered: 10/30/2008)

07/29/2011

23 ORDER of USCA as to 19 Notice of Appeal filed by STANLY J. CATERBONE. Re:


Ordered and Adjudged by this Court that the judgments of the District Court entered on
10/23/07, be and the same are hereby vacated and the cases are remanded for further
proceedings. Costs will not be taxed. All of the above in accordance with the opinion of
this Court. (fdc) (Entered: 08/01/2011)

PACER Service Center


Transaction Receipt
08/13/2015 15:03:11
PACER
Login:

am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:

Description:

Docket Report

Search
Criteria:

2:06-cv04650-MAM

Billable
Pages:

Cost:

0.30

8/13/2015 3:03 PM

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 59 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
1 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 60 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
2 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 61 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
3 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 62 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
4 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 63 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
5 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 64 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
6 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 65 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
7 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 66 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
8 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 67 of 17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
9 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 68 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
10 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 69 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
11 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 70 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
12 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 71 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
13 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 72 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
14 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 73 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
15 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 74 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
16 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 75 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 76 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
18 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 77 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
19 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 78 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
20 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 79 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
21 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 80 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
22 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 81 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
23 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 82 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
24 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 83 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
25 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 84 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
26 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 85 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
27 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 86 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
28 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 87 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
29 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 88 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
30 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 89 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
31 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 90 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
32 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 91 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
33 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 92 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
34 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 93 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
35 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 94 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
36 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 95 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
37 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 96 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
38 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 97 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
39 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 98 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
40 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 99 of17
231 Filed 10/15/07 Page
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
41 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 100 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
42 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 101 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
43 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 102 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
44 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 103 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
45 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 104 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
46 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 105 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
47 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 106 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
48 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 107 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
49 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 108 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
50 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 109 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
51 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 110 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
52 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 111 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
53 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 112 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
54 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 113 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
55 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 114 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
56 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 115 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
57 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 116 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
58 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 117 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
59 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 118 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
60 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 119 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
61 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 120 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
62 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400


Case

Page 121 of
Thursday,
19, 2015
2:06-cv-04650-MAM Document
17231Filed 10/15/07 Page
63 ofNovember
63

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 122 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
mailto:amgroup01@msn.com
717.427-1621 Fax

Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

_________________________________________________________________________
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________________________________________________
STANLY J. CATERBONE
AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
PLAINTIFF

:
:
:
:

v.
WENGER, ET AL

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

DEFENDANTS

CIVIL ACTION
CASE NO. 06-cv-4650

ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT

AND NOW, on this 2nd day of April, 2007, I hereby file an Addendum to this Complaint.

Respectfully submitted,
Date: April 2,2007

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

_____________/s/_____________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street
717-427-1821 facsimile
amgroup01@msn.com

Page 1 of 78

03.30.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

Page 123 of 231

Thursday, November 19, 2015

____________________________________________________________________________________________

COMPLAINT
_________________________________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing ADDENDUM TO COMPLAINT has been served this 2nd day of
April 2007, by first class mail, Postage prepaid, by electronic mail upon, or by hand delivery:

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 2 of 78

03.30.2007

Third Circuit 15-3400

1. Mrs. Wiegand
Of the Lancaster County Assistance Office
P.0 BOX 4967
832 Manor Street
Lancaster pa 17604-4967
2. Ms. JoLynn Stoy
Of the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency
211 North Front Street,
P.O. Box 15530
Harrisburg, PA 171 05-5530
3. Ms. Lynn Patch
Of the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency
211 North Front Street,
P.O. Box 15530
Harrisburg, PA 171 05-5530
4. Officer James McVey
Of the Lancaster City Bureau of Police
39 West Chestnut Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
5. Ms. Kerri Egan of
Select Security/Access
150 North Queen Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
6. Dr. Emily M. Pressley
Of the Lancaster General Hospital
320 North Duke Street
Lancaster. PA 17602
7. Mr. Randall O. Wenger Of The
Lancaster County Office Of The Prothonotary
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
wengerr@co.laneaster.pa.us
8. Mr. Mathew Bomberger Office Of The
Lancaster County Public Defender
29 East King Street-Suite 213
Lancaster, Pa 17602
9. Lancaster County Judge Luis Farina
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
10. Lancaster County District Magistrate
Kelly S. Ballentine, Esq.
123 Locust Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
Fax (717)299-8375
11. Officer Michael K. Schaefer
Of Millersville Boro Police
10 Colonial Avenue
Millersville, PA 17551
12. Mr. Donald Totaro
Lancaster County District Attorney
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
13. Ms. Bachman
Of the Lancaster County Assistance Office
P.O. Box 4967
832 Manor Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
Date: April 2,2007

Page 124 of 231

14. Mr. James Doran


26 Blue Rock Road
Millersville, PA 17551

15. Mr. Steven J. Sikking


Of the Eden Resort Inn
222 Eden Road
Lancaster, PA 17601
16. Mr. John Buckwalter
Of the Lancaster Newspapers, Inc.
8 West King Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
17. Mr. Frank McCabe
Of the High Hotels
High Industries
1853 William Penn Way
Lancaster, PA 17601
18. Mr. Shawn Long
Of Barley Snyder, LLC
126 East King Street
Lancaster, PA 17602-2893
19. Mr. David Pflumm
Of Pflumm Contractors, Inc.
54 South Duke Street
Millersville, PA 17551
20. Mrs. Bleicher
Of the Lancaster County Assistance Office
P.0 BOX 4967
832 Manor Street
Lancaster pa 17604-4967
21. Lancaster County District Magistrate
Stuart J. Mylin
25 East State Street
Quarryville, PA 17566
22. Chief John Fiorill Of The Southern
Regional Police Department
3284 Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516

Thursday, November 19, 2015

27. Lancaster County District Magistrate


Judge Denise Commins
15 Geist Road
Lancaster, PA 17602
28. Lancaster County District Magistrate
Stuart J. Mylin
25 East State Street
Quarryville, PA 17566
29. Chief John Fiorill Of The Southern
Regional Police Department
3284 Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516
30. Lancaster County District Magistrate
William G. Reuter
77 Donegal Business Center
Mount Joy, PA 17552
31. Lancaster County
Judge Michael A. Georgelis
Of The Court of Common Pleas
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602
32. Lancaster County District Magistrate
Leo Eckert, Jr.
841 Stehman Road
Millersville, PA 17551
33. Lancaster County District Magistrate
Judge Maynard Hamilton, Jr.
324 Beaver Valley Pike
Willow Street, PA 17584
Fax 717 464-2824
34. Officer Ronald Bezzard Of The
East Lampeter Police Department
2205 Old Philadelphia Pike
Lancaster, PA 17602
35. Officer Adam Cramer
Of The Southern Regional Police Dept
3284 Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516

23. Officer Robert M. Fedor Of The


Southern
Regional Police Dept
3284 Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516

36. Officer Robert Buser


Of The Southern Regional Police Dept.
3284 Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516

24. JoLynn Steinman, Postmaster


Conestoga Post Office
Main Street
Conestoga, PA 17516

37. Lancaster County


Sherriff S. Bourne
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602

25. Dauphin County District Magistrate


Michael Smith
1281 South 28Th Street
Harrisburg, PA 17111

38. Nelson Brewster, Investigator


PA Attorney General Office/Civil Rights
Enforcement
14th Floor, Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120

26. County Detective Michael Landis


Lancaster County District Attorney Office
50 North Duke Street
Lancaster, PA 17602

39. Ms. Sheryl Crow


c/o Wendell W. Crow, Managing Partner
Crow, Reynolds, Shetley & McVey, LLP
308 First Street
P.O. Box 189
Kennett, MO 63857-0189

Respectfully submitted,
____________/s/_______________
Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
717-427-1821 facsimile
amgroup01@msn.com

ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Page 3 of 78

03.30.2007

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen