Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
[11]
3,969,280
[45] July 13,1976
Sayce et a1.
1541 SOLID AIR FRESHENER GELS
2,691,615
10/1954
2,927,055
3/1960
3,220,960
11/1965
Wichterle....
3,400,890
9/1968
Gould . . . . . . i . .
. . . . ..
3,567,119
3/1971
Wilbert...
.... .. 252/522
Gould . . . . .
. . . . ..
252/522
. . . . ..
252/522
Wis.
[22]
Filed:
8/1971
3,688,985
9/1972
3,886,125
5/1975
Lanzet . . . . . . . . . . . .
_Engel . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . ..
424/76
260/25 R
252/522
[30]
3,596,833
[57]
ABSTRACT
9616/75
[51]
[58]
260/25 R
[56]
References Cited
8/1939
Overshiner ......................
10 Claims, No Drawings
252/522
3,969,280
weight.
It is a still further object of the present invention to
provide an air freshener gel which is simple and eco
nomical to produce.
carregeenan is an expensive material and it is very 25 tion and method of the present invention will become
difficult to produce an economic solid air freshener gel
more apparent from the following, more detailedde
scription thereof.
30
being water.
to produce.
'
45
50
3,969,280
J 3
cellulose, while others contain about 95-99% pure
material. Although it is not critical for proper perform
ance of the air freshener gels of the invention, it is
10
sole cross-linking agent for the CMC since the gel for
mation is easily controlled and a ?rm, yet ?exible, gel is
formed.
120.03 to 1:0.06.
M
M203 '
Y :
effective weight
gm of source of ion
3,969,280
Occasionally, it is necessary also 'to incorporate a
small amount of a sequestering agent which slows the
sidered as limiting.
'
'
EXAMPLE
,.
lowing formulation:
'
Intermediate A
Water
72.65
Preservative
Intermediate B
0.05
Water
Dye
19.86
'
0.10
3.00
'
Sodium hexametaphosphatc
2.00
2.00
' v0.30
0.04
100.00
rectly into a container which can be maintained in an dissolving the sodium hexametaphosphate in water to
"
'
EXAMPLE 2
40
'
69
'
3,969,280
8
EXAMPLE 7
EXAMPLE 5
boxymethyl cellulose.
was prepared:
1.5%
Sodium cMc
0.5%
98.0%
EXAMPLE 8
prepared:
3.0 parts
EXAMPLE 6
3.0
0.3
0.2%
76.5%
Intermediate
2.5
2.0
5.0
parts by wt.
part by wt.
B
grams
grams
grams
0.3 parts
0.2 parts
Formaldehyde preservative
Perfume
10% dye solution in water
EXAMPLE 9
Ethyl Alcohol
Intermediate C
0.5
gram
0.3
gram
30
sulfate
0.06 gram
Sodium hexametaphosphate
9.7
Water
grams
35
kers.
'
-- TABLE 1
Comparative
Example
PART A
CMC
Preservative
Water
PART B
Water
1% Aqueous
Dye Solution
1
3.0
0.1
826
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
30
0.1
0.1
82.6
7.35
2.0
2.0
96.9
96.9
1 9
9.11
'~
Triton
2.0
X-100"
Perfume
Fc2(sO-t)3(2)
Fe (Noshm
Zn( Noah
CuSO4
Zn (0A.);
.
ZnSO4
COM! (ill
Geltimc
Notes
21 0, $1 3;
5'PP!"~
21 :; 21 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 115 121
No gel
51
3,969,280
10
EXAMPLES 22-25
EXAMPLES 10-16
_
intermediate A
prepared
The formulatmns
using different
as shown
viscosity
in Table
CMC. llThe
below
formulawere 10
lmrmz'jgte
CMC B
'
0.00
4 40
100.00
TABLE II
EXAMPLES
10
PART A
Water 1
11
'
12
13
14
84.7
15
10
82.55
98.0
'
8M5
82.65
96.7
96.7
Preservativc
0.05
0.05
--
0.05
0.05
CMC (0501
1.50
3.00
CMC my)
30
1.5
time much
' u
30
1.00
1.5
1.5
PART 0
Chrome 33%
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.40
0.5
Triton x-100
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
2.00
2.00
-~
2.00
2.00
25 min.
l0 min
30 min
35 sec
l min
30 min.
l0 mint
Slight
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Moderate
1% Dye in 11,10
Perfumc
(Belling Time
m-
y 1
TABLE W
Example
22
Dem, at Sum
64
23
24
0:7
0-9
mm, M ?exibyle
Han. tgilshtly less
as
1.2
EXAMPLES l7-21
exi
40
Rem
Lower ?exibm
1?
18
19
20
21
113.11
82.3
83.5
76.5
79.35
0.2
0.2
0.2
0...
PART A
Water
Prcservatlve
(Mo (11.)
0.75
CMC (7M 1
cm: (7H1
Hydroxylateu Guar
1.55
PART a
Water
110.20
Flurcnic 1.64
Chrome I590
Chrome WTliS
2.0
-
0.5
0.75
0.5
7.35
3.0
==
s
m
0.3
0.5
0.15
"1.78
13.41
12.92
w
w
0.4
w
0.4
=~
1.0
0.3
0.5
2
==
0.2
20% Solution of
A1080):
Perfume
ye
Nu Hcxarneta
phosphate
Ethanol
Ceiling Time
Syncrcsis
*"
l 8
0.05
0.06
)-
2.5
0.15
w
0'3
1.8
0.02
0.75
0.0a
w-
0.0t1
L8
0.0a
m
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
20 min
20 min.
30 min.
35 min.
40 min.
'
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
The compositions of Examples 16-19 had no surfacble, although still usable, than the other gel and the
tant but included a guar gum derivative. The perfume
?exibility increases with the degree of substitution.
was evenly distributed throughout the gel. Example 19 65 Although the air freshener gels have been described
was not strong enough to be selfasupporting but was a
relatively ?rm gel. suitable for use in a tub or beaker
like container.
3,969,280
l1
12
110.03 to 120.06.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein said surfac
tant is selected from nonionic surfactants and nonionic
hydrocolloid surfactants.
mixtures.
'
'
25
35
40
45
55
60
65