Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
COURSE DESCRIPTION
1.
2.
10 %
10 %
60 %
5%
10 %
5%
Page 1
2.1.3
It consists of 2 parts. Part A consists of 5 short essay questions and students are
compulsory answer ALL questions. For part A each question carries 10 marks.
Part B consists of 4 long essay questions and students are required to answer
any 2 questions. Each question carries 25 marks. Total marks are 100 and will be
converted into 60 %.
(* Topic 4 - Government administrative machinery excluded from final
exam questions)
2.1.4
a.Description
It is a group work. Each group must comprise of maximum 4 members
(or as allowed by the tutor) in each group, depending on the size of the
class and lecturer/ tutors discretion. Lecturers/tutors may assign any
questions as long as related to topic 4: Government administrative
machinery. Presentation will be individually rated. Total marks are 25 and
will be converted into 5 %.
# Topic 4 - Government administrative machinery (topic 4 was excluded
from final exam; therefore this presentation is designed to assess
students knowledge and comprehension on topic 4).
b. Schedule to present
Between week 6 14.
c. Aspects to include in the presentation slide
d.
i.
ii.
Content :
Introduction
Main points
Conclusion
List of References
Appendix (if any)
Page 2
d.
e.
f.
g.
Allocation of assessment
Based on the assessment form provided.
2.1.5
Introduction
Issue
Conclusion
References
b. Submission of assignment
Final essay must be submitted one week after students present their
work.
c. Allocation of assessment
Based on the assessment form provided. Students will be assessing by
group.
Description
In order to succeed in final exam, each student is required to write an
answer based on past year questions/short or long questions on a topic
Page 3
b.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
is required to answer
is required to answer
is required to answer
is required to answer
is required to answer
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Page 4
Discussion (5 %)
a. Description :
For this part, students will be divided in small groups to explore a number of
issues/scenario related to public administration in Malaysia . Ask your students to
bring to class enough copies of a paper/ marker pen/color pen for each person in
their group. Each group will be asked to work on a different issue for 45 minutes.
Give your students guidelines for critiquing the topic. The most important step is
for every group members to participate during discussion because
lecturers/tutors will assess students performance during group activity. At the
end, each group required to produce mind map/summary of the main ideas and
present it in 5 minutes. Total marks for the 2 group discussion are 40 and will be
converted into 5 %.
Each group needs to discuss TWO (2) issues at 2 different time and
lecturers/tutors will evaluate the students during the discussion
a. schedule to group discussion
1. Week 7
2. Week 12
b. Allocation of Assessment
PAD102-RP MAY 2016
Page 5
Criteria
Very Weak
Weak
Fair
Good
Very Good
1) Personal
Appearance
2) Confident
delivery of
ideas
3) Content
Shabby
Content not
related to
specified topic
4) Language
Poor grammar
5)Effective and
articulate of
delivery of
ideas
Dressed and
require further
improvements
Moderately
dressed and
groomed.
Dressed
and
groomed.
Dressed appropriately
And well groomed
able to deliver
ideas with
limited
confidence
and require
further
improvements
able to deliver
ideas fairly
confidently and
require minor
improvements
Content
related to
specified topic
and require
further
improvements
Content is
related to
specified topic
and require
minor
improvements
Content is
related to
specified
topic
and require
further
improvements
Moderate
Grammatic
ally good
Grammatically correct
and excellent
able to deliver
ideas fairly
effective and
require minor
improvements
Able to
deliver
ideas
effectively
and
articulately
able to deliver
ideas with
limited effect
and require
further
improvements
Able to
deliver
ideas
confidently
Marks
TOTAL (5%)
Page 6
Checked by:
Name : _______________________________
Signature:___________________
Criteria
Very Weak
Weak
Fair
Good
Very Good
1) Format
2) Clearly
written
academic
discourse
Figures/plots not
being described
Not able to write ideas
coherently
4)Systematicall
y written
academic
discourse
5) Originality
Element of plagiarism
Limited element of
plagiarism
Partially
referencing
Proper referencing
and citations
Excellent Proper
referencing and citations
3) Coherently
written
academic
discourse
Page 7
TOTAL (3%)
Checked by:
Name : _______________________________
Signature:___________________
Criteria
Very Weak
Weak
Fair
Good
Very Good
1) Format
2) Clearly written
academic
discourse
3) Coherently
written academic
discourse
4)Systematically
written academic
discourse
Figures/plots not
being described
Not able to write
ideas coherently
TOTAL (7%)
Checked by:
PAD102-RP MAY 2016
Page 8
Name : _______________________________
Signature:___________________
Criteria
Very Weak
Weak
Fair
Good
Very Good
1) Foster
good
relationship
Able to foster
relationships and
work together
with other group
members towards
goal achievement
but with limited
effect.
No clear evidence
of ability to assume
alternate roles as a
group leader and
group members
demonstrated in
practice
Attempt to
demonstrate in
practice the ability
to assume
alternate roles as
a group leader
and group but
with limited effect.
Able to demonstrate in
practice the ability to
assume alternate roles
as a group leader and
group members with
some effects and require
minor improvements
Able to
demonstrate in
practice the ability
to assume alternate
roles as a group
leader and group
members.
Limited respect
and accept
opinion of others
in achieving
groups objectives
Able to well
respect and accept
opinion of others in
achieving groups
objectives
2) Alternate
roles
3) Respect
and accept
opinions
Page 9
4)Knowledg
e and skills
in teamwork
Attempt to
demonstrate
knowledge and
understanding
demonstrated in
practice but with
limited effect.
Able to demonstrate
knowledge and
understanding
demonstrated in practice
and require minor
improvements
Able to
demonstrate
knowledge and
understanding in
practice well
TOTAL (2.5%)
Checked by:
Name : _______________________________
Signature:___________________
Page 10
Page 11