Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No such safeguards
No such accountability
any action).
If project did not start, then acquired land was
secretly sold/leased to private players at skyhigh prices.
1894s land act was bogus and exploitive. So Congress government enacted new law in
2013, with provisions for social impact assessment, fair compensation, dispute settlement
and other fancy things.
LARR-2013 Act became effective from 1st January 2014.
But, this LARR Act-2013 established an extremely complex and impractical land acquisition
process.
Holdouts: Jholachhap NGOs would instigate 20-25% of the affected families to stage
holdout- promising them itll fetch them even higher prices. and Given the 70-80% consent
requirement, the project will never kickoff.
Litigation: because local (and therefore corruption) Patwari and Tehsildars never maintain
proper land records of who owns how much land.
This raised the land prices, red tapism and thus the overall project cost.
Neither the farmer could sell its land and move to urban areas, no the entrepreneur could buy
the land and move towards rural areas.
Combined with Environment-activism and policy paralysis of UPA regime, the end result
was infrastructure bottleneck, high inflation and fall in GDP.
As such those stringent LARR provisions did not apply to 13 central laws e.g. if land was
acquired under Railways Act or Atomic Energy Act, then Social-impact assessment, marketrate compensation etc. were not applicable.
But this Exemption was given only for a year i.e. upto 1st January 2015. By the time,
Government needed to amend those 13 acts so that LARR-like high compensation rates can
be given to farmers in those projects also. But it was no possible to amend 13 central
laws because:
A. Frequent Disruptions in Winter session (December 2014)
B. Modi doesnt enjoy majority in Rajya Sabha.
C. some of the union ministries hadnot even prepared the bills.
Therefore, Government decided to use ordinance route under Article 123 of the Constitution.
LARR-Act 2013
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Compensation:
1. 4 times the market rate in rural area.
2. 2 times in urban area.
3. Social impact assessment (SIA) not required in five types of projects. So, local laborers,
artisans, small traders will either get zero or very small relief package, even if their
livelihood is lost because of industrial/infrastructure project.
4. Private colleges and hospitals too can acquire land. BUT if they continue to charge heftyfees then no real public-purpose is served. Mushrooming of self-financed bogus-quality
Engineering, Pharmacy and MCA colleges doesnt help reaping Indias demographic
dividend.
5. Ordinance doesnt specifically say that such private hospitals and school/colleges are exempt
from Social impact assessment (SIA). But they too can dodge SIA-bullet by claiming its a
social-infrastructure project.
6. In parliamentary democracy, Ordinance should be used only for dire emergency. Modi could
have waited till budget session, and get proper approval from parliament. [Counterargument: there was deadline of 1/1/2015].
Appendix-I: Examples of Public Purpose acquisition
1. Strategic projects e.g. missile silos, anti-aircraft batteries, artillery installments and army
bunkers.
2. All type of infrastructure projects and PPP projects.
3. Cold storage, Packaging-Processing units for Agriculture produce, dairy, fisheries and meat.
4. Industrial corridors and manufacturing clusters.
5. Education, research, vocational institutes.
6. Sports, healthcare, tourism, space-tech.
7. Housing for low income group.
8. Creating new houses/towns for people affected in natural or manmade disasters.
Appendix-II: 13 central laws exempted
If land is acquired for any of these 13 central laws, then LARR-2013 Acts provisions will
not apply (For a year).
Within that time, Government had to amend those 13 laws to give fair compensation. Since
Modi couldnt do it, he got an ordinance cleared to extends LARR-high-compensation rates
to these central laws:
These Acts were exempted from LARR-Act-2013 but covered via Ord
Old Act
Land Acquisition (Mines) Act
Railways Act
Electricity Act
Mock Questions
Q1. Suppose, Government enacted a new law to acquire any land from anybody without
any compensation, then which of the following fundamental rights will be affected?
A. 19/b
B. 19/c
C. 19/d
D. 19/e
Q2. Under Land ordinance 2014, consent of affected families and social impact assessment
is mandatory for which of the following projects?
1. Defense production
2. Housing for low income group
3. Rural electrification
Answer choices
A.
B.
C.
D.
Only 1 and 2
Only 2 and 3
Only 1 and 3
None of them
Q3. Under Land ordinance 2014, who among the following can acquire private land for
public purpose?
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Answer choices
A.
B.
C.
D.
Only 2 and 3
Only 1, 2 and 3
Only 1, 2, 3 and 4
All of them
Only 1 and 2
Only 2 and 3
Only 1 and 3
All of them
Q7. Which of the following act/ordinance exclude the jurisdiction of autonomous council
during land acquisition process in 6th Schedule areas?
1.
2.
3.
4.
121
122
123
124
Q9. President of India can make ordinance on which of the following matters?
1. Price control
2. Lunacy
3. Gas and gas works
Answer choices
A.
B.
C.
D.
Only 1 and 2
Only 2 and 3
Only 1 and 3
None of them
Six days
Six weeks
Six months
Immediately when both houses are adjourned-sine-die.
Q11. Consider following statements about the ordinance making powers of the President of
India.
1. He can issue ordinances in retrospective manner.
2. He can repeal any act made by parliament using an ordinance.
3. His ordinance powers are inspired from American Constitution.
Answer choices
A.
B.
C.
D.
Only 1 and 2
Only 2 and 3
Only 1 and 3
None of them
Q12. The fundamental right to acquire, hold and dispose of property, was eliminated by
which amendment?
A.
B.
C.
D.
41st
42nd
43rd
44th