Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Microchemical Journal
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/microc
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Universit di Trento, via Sommarive 9, 38123 Povo, Trento, Italy
Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosoa, Universit di Trento, via T. Gar, 38122, Trento, Italy
McCord Centre for Historic and Cultural Landscape, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, Newcastle University, Queen Victoria Rd, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 18 August 2015
Received in revised form 16 December 2015
Accepted 20 December 2015
Available online 28 December 2015
Keywords:
X-ray diffraction
X-ray uorescence
Rietveld method
Combined analysis
Non-destructive testing
Bronze alloys
a b s t r a c t
X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray uorescence (XRF) techniques are broadly used for materials characterisation.
In some respects, they can be regarded as complementary, as long as the rst is mostly used to get phase (crystallographic) information and the second to evaluate chemical composition of the analysed samples. In this paper
we present a combined approach for the acquisition and integrated analysis of XRD and XRF data. A novel laboratory instrument has been developed to perform XRD and XRF measurements simultaneously, using the same
radiation source and two detectors collecting the diffraction and uorescence patterns in a scanning mode. A
combined Rietveld based renement of both XRD and XRF data is then performed to obtain phase and chemical
compositions. As a eld test of the proposed approach, we analysed some archaeological nds from an alpine pastoral enclosure in Val Por (Val di Sole, Trentino, Italy). The different features of the analysed archaeological specimens provide indications on the wide applicability range of the proposed approach, that may therefore result
particularly useful and effective in materials analysis, including those pertaining to the archaeological and cultural heritage elds.
2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
1. Introduction
X-ray diffraction (XRD) and uorescence (XRF) techniques, originally
developed for materials science and engineering research, are also widely
used to obtain primary material information in the cultural and archaeological heritage elds [1,2]. In some respects, these techniques are
complementary, since the rst one is mostly used to get phase (crystallographic) information and the second chemical composition of the
analysed samples. Of course, a close relationship is there between the
two material properties and data from XRD and XRF can be in principle
interactively used to improve the reliability of phase and chemical quantitative analyses. In fact, several literature studies report on the use of
these techniques to attain a better understanding in specic material issues. XRD and XRF data can be acquired either separately, using different
instruments [1,36], possibly in association with other techniques [1,7] or
with a single integrated equipment [812]. This latter approach is particularly interesting from two standpoints. First of all, experimental data
come from substantially the same material volume. Moreover, the integration of the two techniques in one single instrument is denitely interesting for portable equipment and, thereby, in situ measurements.
Selected papers presented at TECHNART 2015 Conference, Catania (Italy), April 27
30, 2015.
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: stefano.gialanella@unitn.it (S. Gialanella).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2015.12.031
0026-265X/ 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
424
The whole data analysis procedure needs rst the identication of all
the principal crystallographic phases present in the analysed material.
Therefore, all crystallographic parameters of the identied phases are
required to carry out the analyses described in the present paper.
Minor phases and chemical impurities can be added successively to
ameliorate the XRD and XRF pattern tting.
To test the investigation protocol, a set of measurements has been
conducted on some archaeological samples from an alpine pastoral enclosure in Val Por (Val di Sole, Trentino, Italy) [15,16].
Fig. 1. INEL Equinox 3500 diffractometer modied with a 2D XRD detector working in
scanning mode and a X123 Amptek detector to collect the X-ray uorescence spectra. The
source is a Mo microsource operated at 40 kV and 1 mA. The sample holder is horizontal
and xed during the scanning. XRF detector is xed. The large space below the sample
holder permits the non-destructive analysis even of large samples.
425
Fig. 2. XRD and XRF combined tting for sample ID 1083. In a) the Rietveld t plot is shown for the diffraction part and in b) the corresponding t for the XRF is reported. In both plots dots
correspond to experimental values and the line the calculated pattern. The phases and elemental composition obtained by the t are reported in Table 1.
426
Fig. 3. The investigated archaeological samples. Macrographs of the archaeological artefacts considered in the present study (see Table 1 for sample description). All archaeometric
investigations have been conducted on the face/side of the specimen appearing in the relevant picture. a) ID 1122; b) ID 1123; c) ID 1124; d) ID 1125; e) ID 1083; f) RR29.
In Table 1 the results of the XRD and XRF are summarised. All tests
were conducted in a fully non-destructive way, just mounting each artefact in the experimental apparatus.
427
Table 1
Results of the combined XRDXRF analysis on the archaeological samples (Fig. 3).
Sample
Crystallographic phases
Description
ID 1112
ID 1113
ID 1124
ID 1125
ID 1083
border
ID 1083
center
RR 29
Another common feature of these samples is the general external aspect, in terms of colouring, surface roughness, most likely featuring the
presence of residuals of the burial ground. From the methodological
point of view, these samples afford an excellent opportunity to assess
phase and chemical compositions even in case light elements are significantly present and their quantication is not supported by the presence
of well crystallised structures. Notwithstanding these limitations, silicon, aluminium and iron oxides result to be the main components of
both specimens. These results have been conrmed by the EDXS analyses that provided also additional information, interesting for the archaeological attribution of the material samples (see below).
3.3. Sample ID 1124
Lead is the majority element in this sample and several lead based
compounds have been identied. The core part of the fragment is
made of metallic lead, in which a little amount of cadmium and silver
are dissolved. The thick outer layer is mainly made of white lead
(PbCO3, cerussite) with lower contributions from lead (II) sulde (galena) and lead oxide (PbO-massicot). Small amounts of calcite (CaCO3),
magnetite (Fe3O4) and hematite (Fe2O3), mostly close to the surface,
complete the picture of the phase composition of this fragment.
3.4. Sample ID 1083
This coin features on both sides, although to a different extent, a
thick corrosion layer, that partially covers the central part of the nd.
The main crystallographic phase in both regions is an fcc silver alloy
that coexists with copper oxides: CuO (tenorite) and Cu2O (cuprite)
(see Fig. 2a) and b)). The equilibrium AgCu binary phase diagram
[21] features a limited solid state solubility and this involves the presence of a mixture of silver and copper rich solid solutions. From the
428
XRD data, no traces of this latter have been detected: a preferential oxidation of the copper rich phase of the original two phase alloy has occurred, leading to the formation of copper oxides, that are usually
reported as constituent phases of patination layer in CuSn alloys [22].
3.5. Sample RR 29
This sample, that on eye inspection appeared to be made of a bronze
material, was actually tested with the deliberate intention to verify
whether its composition is compatible with that of the ID 1112 sample.
The high concentration of lead and the additional presence of iron, differentiate clearly one sample from the other, providing also indication
on a fully different extraction approach, as proved by the concentration
of As in the RR29 specimen. This element, fully missing in the ID 1112
material, will certainly address further investigations on mining and extraction technologies, in potential association with the development of
trading and commercial routes.
Fig. 4. Combined analysis t for sample RR29: in a) the XRD (Mo radiation) Rietveld t part is shown, in b) the XRF spectrum tting part, both collected simultaneously. In c) a 2D plot is
reported for the XRF tting with all the experimental spectra in the bottom and the calculated ones in the top part; the incident beam angle increases from bottom to top in each
corresponding part; the plot in b) corresponds to the summation of all experimental and calculated spectra reported in c); a similar decrease of all uorescence lines intensities is
visible here indicating the sample homogeneity. In d) the XRD Rietveld t (Cu monochromatic radiation) is reported as rened in combination with the XRD and XRF data reported in
a), b) and c); the metallic glass bump is well visible in this pattern.
429
Fig. 4 (continued).
improve the sensitivity on the glass amount. The homogeneous distribution of all phases and composition is visible from the comparable
smooth decrease of all uorescence lines in Fig. 4c well reproduced by
the calculation (apart the Mo diffraction lines and Compton scattering
between 16.5 and 21 keV, that have not been completely modelled
but excluded from the renement see Fig. 4b).
4. Tentative archaeological interpretation
Although the main focus of the work was to assess the possibilities
afforded by the proposed combined XRDXRF approach described in
the former paragraphs, the results obtained from the characterisation
of the archaeological nds (Fig. 3) still deserve a few comments,
concerning possible historical and archaeological implications.
The general feeling is that the site from which these artefacts have
been excavated was exploited, probably over quite a wide time interval,
for different metallurgical activities. The main indication that in the site
metals and related materials were not just used but also produced and
430
Fig. 5. SEM micrographs showing inclusion found on the surface of the: a) ID 1113 tin
based; b) ID 1125 lead based. Chemical determinations by EDXS.
[1] E. Pantos, W. Kockelmann, L.C. Chapon, L. Lutterotti, S.L. Bennet, M.J. Tobin,
J.F.W. Mosselmans, T. Pradell, N. Salvado, S. Buti, S. Garner, A.J.N.W. Prag, Neutron and X-ray characterisation of the metallurgical properties of a 7th century
BC Corinthian-type bronze helmet, Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B 239 (2005)
1626.
[2] Y. Xie, L. Lutterotti, H.-R. Wenk, F. Kovacs, Texture analysis of ancient coins with TOF
neutron diffraction, J. Mater. Sci. 39 (2004) 33293337.
[3] J. Schnenberger, T. Momose, B. Wagner, W.H. Leong, V.R. Tarnawski, Canadian eld
soils I. Mineral composition by XRD/XRF measurements, Int. J. Thermophys. 33
(2012) 342362.
[4] V.R. Tarnawski, M.L. McCombie, W.H. Leong, B. Wagner, T. Momose, J.
Schnenberger, Canadian eld soils II. Modeling of quartz occurrence, Int. J.
Thermophys. 33 (2012) 843863.
[5] G. Piga, G. Solinas, Giuliana, T.J.U. Thompson, A. Brunetti, A. Malgosa, S. Enzo, Is X-ray
diffraction able to distinguish between animal and human bones? J. Archaeol. Sci. 40
(2013) 778785.
[6] G. Piga, A. Brunetti, B. Lasio, L. Malfatti, Luca, A. Galobart, Angel, F.M. Dalla Vecchia,
M. Fabio, S. Enzo, New insights about the presence of celestite into fossil bones from
Moli del Bar 1 site (Isona i Conca Della, Lleida, Spain), Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 118 (2015) 487496.
[7] L.V. de Voorde, J. Van Pevenage, K. De Langhe, R. DeWolf, B. Vekemans, L. Vincze, P.
Vandenabeele, M.P.J. Martens, Non-destructive in situ study of Mad Meg by Pieter
Bruegel the Elder using mobile X-ray uorescence, X-ray diffraction and Raman
spectrometers, Spectrochim. Acta B 97 (2014) 16.
[8] D. Vaniman, D. Bish, G. Guthrie, S. Chipera, D. Blake, S.A. Collins, S.T. Elliott, P.
Sarrazin, Process monitoring and control with CHEMIN, a miniaturized CCD-based
instrument for simultaneous XRD/XRF analysis, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. (October 1999).
[9] A. Duran, J.L. Perez-Rodriguez, T. Espejo, M.L. Franquelo, J. Castaing, P. Walter, Characterization of illuminated manuscripts by laboratory-made portable XRD and
micro-XRD systems, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 395 (2009) 19972004.
[10] L. Beck, H. Rousseliere, J. Castaing, A. Duran, M. Lebon, B. Moignard, F. Plassard, First
use of portable system coupling X-ray diffraction and X-ray uorescence for in-situ
analysis of prehistoric rock art, Talanta 129 (2014) 459464.
[11] A. Mendoza Cuevas, F. Bernardini, A. Gianoncelli, C. Tuniz, Energy dispersive X-ray
diffraction and uorescence portable system for cultural heritage applications, XRay Spectrom. 44 (2015) 105115.
[12] L.V. de Voorde, B. Vekemans, E. Verhaeven, P. Tack, R. De Wolf, J. Garrevoet, P.
Vandenabeele, L. Vincze, Analytical characterization of a new mobile X-ray uorescence and X-ray diffraction instrument combined with a pigment identication case
study, Spectrochim. Acta B 110 (2015) 1419.
[13] L. Lutterotti, S. Matthies, H.-R. Wenk, A.S. Schultz, J.W. Richardson, Combined texture and structure analysis of deformed limestone from time-of-ight neutron diffraction spectra, J. Appl. Phys. 81 (1997) 594600.
[14] L. Lutterotti, Total pattern tting for the combined size-strain-stress-texture determination in thin lm diffraction, Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. B 268 (2010)
334340.
[15] F. Carrer, D.E. Angelucci, Debates de Arqueologa Medieval, 3 2013, pp. 149165.
[16] Paesaggi pastorali d'alta quota in Val di Sole (Trento), in: D.E. Angelucci, F. Carrer
(Eds.),Le ricerche del progetto ALPES 20102014. Dipartimento di Lettere e
Filosoa, Universit di Trento, Trento, (2015) complete volume (in Italian), 2015.
[17] L. Lutterotti, G. Pepponi, 2016 (in preparation).
[18] D. Li, P. Frank, S. Furtauer, D. Cupid, H. Flandorfer, The CuSn phase diagram part II:
new thermodynamic assessment, Intermetallics 34 (2013) 148158.
[19] D.A. Scott, Copper and Bronze in Art: Corrosion, Colorants, Conservation, Getty Publ.,
2002
[20] L. Lutterotti, R. Ceccato, R. Dal Maschio, E. Pagani, Quantitative analysis of silicate
glass in ceramic materials by the Rietveld method, Mater. Sci. Forum 278 (1998)
8792.
[21] ASM Handbook Volume 03: Alloy Phase Diagram, ASM International, 1992.
[22] L. Robbiola, J.M. Blengino, C. Fiaud, Morphology and mechanisms of formation of
natural patinas on archaeological CuSn alloys, Corros. Sci. 40 (1998) 20832111.
[23] R.F. Tylecote, A History of Metallurgy, 2nd ed. Maney publ, London, UK, 1992.