DECLARATION OF INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY AGAINST JALAUR RIVER

MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT PHASE II

1st International Solidarity Mission in Jalaur River
18 July 2016

We, the delegates to the 1st International Solidarity Mission in Jalaur River, representing
different organizations from 5 countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Philippines, and South
Korea), stand united with the Tumandok people of Panay Island, also known as the Panay
Bukidnon, in their struggle against the Jalaur River Multi-Purpose Project II.
BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT:
The Philippine government is set on implementing the Jalaur River Multipurpose Project
Phase II (JRMP II), which had its groundbreaking ceremony led by President Benigno
Aquino III on February 2013. The project will construct a PHP11.212 billion dam in the
ancestral domain of the indigenous peoples (IP), the Tumandok, in Calinog town, province
of Iloilo. This approved project will be funded by a PHP8.94 billion loan from The ExportImport Bank of Korea or Korea Eximbank and the remaining PHP2.2 billion will be the
Philippine counterpart which in turn be taken out from the Filipino peoples taxes.
The Philippine Government and its agencies, the National Irrigation Administration (NIA)
and the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) have been less than upfront
with regards this project. It was only when the organization TUMANDUK together with
other cause-oriented organizations raised the hue and cry about the lack of proper
processes, did the public know that the project never underwent the process of seeking
the acceptance of the stakeholders, including the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)
from the IP, Tumandok, who will be directly affected by the said project.
The stakeholders include: the 16 IP communities which will be directly and indirectly
affected, the population in 30 additional communities identified as crash areas and 25
municipalities from the province of Iloilo and within the Jalaur River Basin vulnerable to
flooding. Not to mention the rest of the nation who will shoulder and pay the costs of the
megadam in Jalaur River. None of these groups were ever informed about the impacts of
the proposed project, nor were they involved in the decision-making processes that is
required of ODA-sourced projects.
There was no prior consultation because NIA's feasibility study was already submitted to
the Korea Eximbank in November 2011, even before the first FPIC process was initiated in
January 2012. This was followed by a series of consultative assemblies culminating in
the signing of the so-called FPIC for the dam construction on August 2015. There was no
free consent because those in the affected communities have been and promised
incentives in exchange for their support while those opposed to the project were subjected
to threats and intimidation. Neither was this informed because only the projects
supposed advantages were presented while withholding the dangers and negative
impacts.
As a consequence of this deception, not only will the Tumandok be displaced from their
ancestral domain, the project will also result in the dissolution of their cultural identity and
indigenous knowledge and practices which are rooted in the land. The construction of the
Page 1 of 3

dam will also destroy ancestral landmarks, burial grounds, sacred spots, and sites for
rituals.
Our second concern is the lack of a comprehensive options assessment that is supposed
to be part of the decision-making processes for the stakeholders, as provided by the report
released in the year 2000 by the World Commission on Dams. A mega-dam project poses
a wide range of concerns including the structural integrity of the infrastructure itself, its
long-term impact on ecosystems and the social and economic costs to vulnerable sectors.
In the long run, the question that the Philippine government must answer is: Will the cost
benefit ratio of building a megadam in Jalaur River be worth it?
Concerned IP leaders and IP rights advocates initiated an environmental investigation
along the dam site. Based on their initial survey, the site revealed questionable structural
integrity in the foundation for the dam. The faults, joints and talus piles that were observed
within the 1.25 kilometer stretch of the river imply a geologic condition which requires
particular engineering design and technology. The investigation also yielded information on
the diversity of species and presence of a few endemic animals, some of which are
classified as endangered and critically endangered by the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature (such as the Visayan writhed-billed hornbill, Red-vented cockatoo,
and Visayan warty pig), and whose habitats will be greatly affected by the megadam.
These findings were also corroborated by the opinions and synthesis report done by Dr.
Ricarte S. Javelosa, a geologist and geomorphologist expert. He pointed out that the
project lacked a comprehensive Engineering and Seismic Risk Assessment (ESRA) and
Engineering Geological and Geohazard Assessment (EGGAR) which are necessary in
ensuring the structural integrity of the site and of the dam itself, considering that the
proposed megadam sits on a fault line. The project also did not have a comprehensive
hyrdrogeological study and groundwater vulnerability assessment which are relevant to
both groundwater supply and control and ground-water contamination.
And third, stakeholders in the affected downstream communities have raised concerns as
to the impacts of possible flooding on their lives and their livelihoods. The government
claims that one of the objectives of the JRMP II is to provide irrigation water to farmers, but
according to studies made by the Jalaur River for the People Movement, the so-called
targeted ricelands for irrigation has been converted, in the process of conversion, or will be
converted into real estate purposes.
Thus taking into account all these concerns raised by the Tumandok people and other
stakeholders, we the delegates to the 1st International Solidarity Mission in Jalaur River,
support and stand in one with them in their struggle against the implementation of JRMP II.
OUR CALLS:
1. We call on the Philippine government, its agencies and the Armed Forces of the
Philippines to respect the Tumandok peoples rights to their ancestral domain and
their processes of decision-making. The Tumandok people must be able to make
informed decisions freely, without coercion, bribery and promises from the
government, its agencies, and the military. A genuine FPIC process must be
observed.
2. We call for the stop of the militarization in the countryside, the pull-out of state
security forces, including the Armed Forces of the Philippines, the Philippine
Page 2 of 3

National Police's Regional Mobile Group and Special Action Forces, and
paramilitary groups from IP communities, and the investigation of human rights
violations that were committed to coerce the IPs into consenting to the JRMP II.
3. We moreover call on the Philippine government to carry out the prompt
indemnification of IPs and other victims for their properties damaged in the course
of the implementation of the JRMP II.
4. We also call on the Duterte administration to review all development projects,
including mega-dams and reforestation programs, intended to be implemented in
the Tumandok peoples ancestral domain and to end projects which desacralize the
Tumandok peoples cultural identity and violate their rights.
5. And we call on the South Korean Government, the loan-provider for the JRMP II, to
deeply evaluate the issues that were raised by the IP communities and other
stakeholders and to take necessary actions to address these concerns, including
withholding of funds unless these concerns are properly addressed.
OUR RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. We recommend that an independent study on the feasibility of the proposed Jalaur
River Dam be done in order to assess the proposed dams structural integrity, its
impacts on the ecosystems along the Jalaur River, its socio-economic impacts on
the IP communities that will be directly and indirectly affected by the dam including
the downstream communities.
2. We also recommend that an exhaustive and comprehensive assessment be made
on options and alternatives to the mega-dam. Of particular interest would be to
assess the feasibility of small and micro-dams that are less hazardous and can still
provide irrigation water to farming communities. Another option would be the
rehabilitation of existing irrigation systems.
3. We further recommend that proposed dam projects in Jalaur and in Pan-ay rivers
comply with the guidelines in the final report of the World Commission on Dams in
2000; that the process of free, prior and informed consent be strictly observed; and
that international guidelines and safeguards on dam-building and projects related to
ODA be followed as well.

Organisations & Advocates

Alliance of Health Workers, Philippines Anakbayan, Philippines Anakpawis Panay, Philippines Asian Peasant
Coalition Bagong Alyansang Makabayan-Panay, Philippines DAGSAW, Philippines Banana Chips Planters and
Workers Association, Philippines Fair Trade Foundation Panay, Philippines Fisheries and Marine Environment
Research Institute, global Jalaur River for the Peoples Movement, Philippines KARAPATAN Negros KARAPATAN
Panay, Philippines Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP), Philippines National Union of Peoples Lawyers,
Philippines Oikos, Philippines Paghugpong sang Mangunguma sa Panay kag Guimaras, Philppines Panay Fair
Trade Center, Philippines Peoples Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, South Korea Philippines Sugar Workers
Solidarity Negros, Philippines Promotion of Church Peoples Response, Philippines SELDA, Philippines Sine
Panayanon, Philippines Task Force for Indigenous Peoples Rights, Philippines TUMANDUK, Philippines Third
World Health Alliance, global Beatrice de Blasi, Italy Hannah Wolf, Germany Jude Mangilog, Philippines Ma. Arve
Baez, Philippines Mar Anthony Balani, Philippines

Page 3 of 3