Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
emissions policy
SUBMITTED TO:
Ed Ray
Sustainable Energy Initiative President
SUBMITTED BY:
Jack Baker
Pre-Environmental Engineer Major
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR 97331
June 2012
Baker 1
Table of contents:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................3
Scope.................................................................................................................3
Methodology.......................................................................................................3
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................4
Scope.................................................................................................................4
Methodology.......................................................................................................5
FINDINGS..........................................................................................................5-13
Recent research in biofuels................................................................................5-6
Transportation emission reduction programs and legislature..................................7-9
Evolution of policy concerning greenhouse gas emissions...................................10-13
CONCLUSION................................................................................................13-14
Recommendations..........................................................................................................14
REFERENCES.................................................................................................15-16
List of figures cited...........................................................................................................17
Baker 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following report provides a look at the evolving role of federal agencies in regulating the
nation's transportation fuel supply by summarizing and organizing a combination of pamphlets,
bills, scientific studies, court cases, and announcements into three categories. The first category
provides a look at recent research in biofuel efficiency, the second category looks at bills and
acts related to transportation efficiency, and the third category looks at some significant political
decisions and cases which are changing policy and legislature concerning greenhouse gas
emissions.
Biofuels have been coming under closer examination as the industrialization of foreign countries
and exponential growth in the human population increases the demand for petroleum energy. The
U.S. has been heavily subsidizing corn-derived ethanol in an effort to increase domestic energy
production, but many indirect issues involving monocultures of food used as fuel have begun to
emerge as a result. Biofuels using materials such as rapeseed, soybean, palm, sunflower, wheat,
maize, sugar beet, and potatoes are being explored, along with biohydrogen, biogas, and natural
gas in order to lessen the demand on foods as fuel, and to pinpoint more efficient conversions of
biomass into liquid fuel.
Similarly, the forces that spur research in biofuel development also put additional responsibilities
of energy diversification into the hands federal government agencies such as the Environmental
Protection Agency, Department of Energy, and Department of Transportation. Goals that these
agencies push for include increasing vehicle fuel efficiency, reducing vehicle fuel emissions, and
diversifying fuel sources in order to increase energy independence.
There is also an emerging call for increasing regulation of greenhouse gas emissions in order to
slow the rate of global climate change. Before recent supreme court cases and presidential calls
for action and policy, much of the country and federal agencies weren't equipped or ready to deal
with the profound impact from greenhouse gas emissions on the climate. As these consequences
are becoming increasingly proved and accepted, new policies, programs, and collaborations
between federal agencies are being implemented with previous legislative frameworks to address
the multifaceted problem of energy use and it's consequences.
SCOPE
This report looks at effects from the increasing global demand for petroleum energy, which has
recently spurred research in biofuels, changes in US federal policies regarding energy efficiency,
and most recently collaboration between separate and independent federal agencies in an effort
to address global climate change.
METHODOLOGY
The sources secured for this paper were primarily found on government agency websites which
provide the public with copies of federal mandates, statutes, and pamphlets. The OSU online
database was also used to find articles discussing the emergence of new biofuel production
techniques and their efficiencies.
Baker 3
INTRODUCTION
The following report examines the evolving role of government agencies in regulating the
nation's transportation fuel supply by summarizing and organizing a combination of federal
pamphlets, bills, scientific studies, court cases, and announcements into three categories. The
first category provides a look at recent research in biofuel efficiency, the second category looks
at transportation emission programs and legislature designed to increase transportation energy
efficiency, and the third category looks at some recent federal decisions and cases which are
changing policy and legislature concerning greenhouse gas emissions.
The 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA), 1992 Energy Policy Act (EPAct), 2007 Energy Independence
and Security Act (EISA), and programs such as the reformulated gasoline program and clean
cities program have been making contributions in securing energy independence, reducing
emissions of toxic air-borne pollutants, and making petroleum energy more efficient and
affordable in the US. To meet these goals, federal agencies such as the Environmental Protection
Agency, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy have drafted various bills and
programs which require increases in fuel efficiency, reductions in toxic emissions, and increases
in alternative fuels and alternative fuel vehicles. A heavily used strategy of the federal
government involves lowering the price of corn through subsidizations so farmers have
incentives to plant massive monocultures for ethanol blenders. This ethanol is most often mixed
in a 10:1 ratio with petroleum gasoline to make what's called an E10 fuel mixture. E10 fuel
mixture gasoline is often the only kind of gasoline available at commercial gas stations in the
United States. This means that ethanol blenders, farmers, and states with fertile agricultural land
are nearly always voting for further ethanol subsidizations and less regulation of dangerous but
effective nitrogen fertilizers.
In the past twenty or so years however, there has been an increasingly urgent call for the federal
government to create and enforce mandatory standards for petroleum greenhouse gas emissions
as the impact on the climate is becoming more dramatic. Because actions to address these
problems are often multi-faceted, controversial, and costly, there has been a slow political
response to the scientifically grounded urgency of atmosphere-insulating emissions. It is widely
recognized that it is not healthy for Earth's climate to accumulate excess amounts of insulating
chemicals. As sunlight enters the atmosphere these emissions act as insulators slowing the rate at
which incoming heat reflects from the Earth's surface back into space, which slowly raises the
overall temperature of the climate. This phenomena has become known as the 'greenhouse
effect', because the trapping of heat in a greenhouse is a similar and easily understood
comparison. This is also why gaseous insulating compounds are call 'greenhouse gases' (GHG).
SCOPE
This report looks at effects from the increasing rate of energy consumption, which has recently
spurred research in biofuels, changes in federal policies regarding transportation efficiency, and
collaboration between federal agencies to address global climate change.
Baker 4
METHODOLOGY
The sources secured for this paper were primarily found on government agency websites which
provide the public with copies of federal mandates and statutes, and their pamphlets. The OSU
online database was also used to find articles discussing the emergence of new biofuel
production techniques and their efficiencies.
FINDINGS
Recent research in biofuels
Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean
and Sunflower:
The following statement can be used to sum up Pimentel's and Patzek's report regarding ethanol
and biodiesel efficiency; "In contrast to the USDA, numerous scientific studies have concluded
that ethanol production does not provide a net energy balance, that ethanol is not a renewable
energy source, is not an economical fuel, and its production and use contribute to air, water, and
soil pollution and global warming" (Patzek & Pimentel, 2005, p. 66). The authors support these
claims by citing both their own and others scientific findings. The report looks at ethanol derived
from corn, switchgrass, and wood, and biodiesel from soybean and sunflowers. There are
significant problems with corn derived ethanol, particularly issues resulting from using corn as a
fuel rather than food. "An average U.S. automobile travels about 20,000 miles/yr and uses about
1,000 gallons of gasoline per yr (USBC, 2003). To replace only a third of this gasoline with
ethanol, 0.6 ha [1.48 acres] of corn must be grown. Currently, 0.5 ha [1.24 acres] of cropland is
required to feed each American. Therefore...to feed one automobile with ethanol, substituting
only one third of the gasoline used per year, Americans would require more cropland than they
need to feed themselves" (Patzek & Pimentel, 2005, p. 67). This means that further ethanol
subsidization "can be expected to increase corn prices further for beef production and ultimately
increase costs to the consumer. Therefore, in addition to paying the $8.4 billion in taxes for
ethanol and corn subsidies, consumers are expected to pay significantly higher meat, milk, and
egg prices in the market place" (Patzek & Pimentel, 2005, p. 68). Switch grass derived ethanol,
similar to corn, "results in a negative energy return...[of] 50%,...slightly higher than the negative
energy return for corn ethanol production" (Patzek & Pimentel, 2005, p. 70). Pimentel and
Patzek also find that "about 57% more energy is required to produce a liter of ethanol using
wood than the energy harvested as ethanol" (Patzek & Pimentel, 2005, p. 71). For biodiesel, oil
derived from soybeans and sunflowers is primarily used. For soybeans, after factoring in the
usable byproducts of production, " the net loss in terms of energy is 8%" (Patzek & Pimentel,
2005, p. 72). To produce sunflower-derived biodiesel, "the fossil energy input is 118% higher
than the energy content of the sunflower biodiesel" (Patzek & Pimentel, 2005, p. 73). In their
conclusion, the authors recommend the use of photo-voltaics for energy, which can capture about
10% of the sunlight they are exposed to. In contrast, plants, which gain their biomass through the
same process, capture and convert on average only 0.1% of the energy they are exposed to by
the sun (Patzek & Pimentel, 2005, p. 73).
Baker 5
Figure 1
Figure 2
The study looks at petroleum displacement scenarios using biofuels and the resulting cropland
normally used to grow food that would be sacrificed growing resources used to manufacture
these biofuels. "According to International Energy Agency (IEA), scenarios developed for the
USA and the EU indicate that near-term targets of up to 6% displacement of petroleum fuels
with biofuels appear feasible using conventional biofuels, given available cropland. A 5%
displacement of gasoline in the EU requires about 5% of available cropland to produce ethanol
while in the USA 8% is required. A 5% displacement of diesel requires 13% of USA cropland,
15% in the EU [32]" (Demirbas, 2006, 3).
Baker 6
reduce U.S. dependence on imported oil" (Report to Congress, 2008, p. 4). Under title III of
EPACT 1992, 75% of light-duty vehicles
acquired by federal fleets for use "in U.S. metropolitan areas must be alternative fuel vehicles
(AFVs)" (DOE, 2007, p. 1). The second component of title III provides agencies with credits for
"each light-, medium-, or heavyduty AFV they acquire each year
Figure 4
and for biodiesel (typically used
in B20, a blend of 20% biodiesel,
80% petroleum diesel) used in
fleet vehicles" (DOE, 2007, p. 1).
Title IV of EPACT 1992
"includes programs focused on
alternative fuel trucks and buses,
public information, state and local incentives, and technician training" (Report to Congress,
2008, p. 7). Title V outlines AFV acquisition requirements for "AFPs [Alternative Fuel
Providers], state governments, private companies, and local governments" (Report to Congress,
2008, p. 8). Title V primarily sets and defines replacement fuel production goals for the motor
fuels sector with a goals to be met by 2010. This 1992 act aimed to replace 10% of the nation's
transportation fuel with a biofuel by 2000, and 30% of U.S. fuel by 2010. However, after the
2005 Clean Energy Act amendment enacted by George W. Bush through executive order, the
DOE now has the ability to modify the goal's replacement percentage and timeframe. Although
10% replacement goal has been met by the original timeframe, on March 6, 2007 the "DOE
determined through its analysis that the 30 percent Replacement Fuel Goal cannot be met by
2010" (Report to Congress, 2008, p. 9). After completing the analysis the "DOE determined that
the 30 percent goal can be achieved by 2030, and revised the replacement fuel goal accordingly"
(Report to Congress, 2008, p. 9). Together, title IV and V of this act form the basis for the Clean
Cities program activities which provides information for the public regarding AFV's and
alternative fuels. A goal of the Clean Cities program to increase ethanol fuel blends was
examined in the previous summary.
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA)
The purpose of the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) is "To move the United
States toward greater energy independence and security, to increase the production of clean
renewable fuels, to protect consumers, to increase the efficiency of products, buildings, and
vehicles, to promote research on and deploy greenhouse gas capture and storage options, and to
improve the energy performance of the Federal Government, and for other purposes" (110th
Congress, 2007, p. 1492). One of the most significant elements of this bill is "TITLE II
ENERGY SECURITY THROUGH INCREASED PRODUCTION OF BIOFUELS" (110th
Congress, 2007, p. 1492), where congress defined the seven different types of advanced biofuels
that are currently recognized and encouraged for implementation in conjunction with annually
decided replacement fuel goals. The biofuels and their definitions are as follows:
"(I)
(II)
(III)
Ethanol derived from waste material, including crop residue, other vegetative waste
material, animal waste, and food waste and yard waste.
(IV) Biomass-based diesel.
(V)
Biogas (including landfill gas and sewage waste treatment gas) produced through the
conversion of organic matter from renewable biomass.
(VI) Butanol or other alcohols produced through the conversion of organic matter from
renewable biomass.
(VII) Other fuel derived from cellulosic biomass" (110th Congress, 2007, p. 1519-1520).
Costs and benefits of the Clean Air Act: 1990-2020
This report provides cost, benefit, and emission scenarios of EPA's 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA)
which uses data ranging from 1990 to the data projections for 2020. It then compares these data
sets to projected scenarios also dating from 1990-2020 in which the United States and earth are
living without the Clean Air Act. The report uses figures to communicate the many levels of
economic benefits resulting from the act, compared right next to the cost which are 2000-2020
projections (figures 5 and 6). Comparisons of "key pollutant emissions" can be seen in figure 6.
Figure 5
Figure 6
Baker 9
effectiveness would be minimal, as much of the carbon prevented from being released into
ambient air will be offset by other developing country's GHG emissions. The EPA argued that
this is an issue too broad for a single government agency to deal with, that doing so would
undermine potential presidential negotiations for international GHG emission standards, and that
this issue should be dealt with by congress. In response to the EPA's denial of the petitions,
several cities and 12 states filed a lawsuit in the district of Columbia court of Appeals against the
EPA for their failure to enact GHG regulation standards for vehicle fuel emissions under the
CAA. In 2007 The court of appeals was granted a writ of certiorari by the Supreme Court. This
means that the case would be handed to the Supreme Court for ruling. However, all the
petitioners were denied eligibility for lawsuit by the court on the grounds that they were not
individually affected by global warming, with the exception of the state of Massachusetts (EPA
petition denial, 2001).
Massachusetts vs. EPA
After the suit filed by Massachusetts was deemed eligible, the state argued that the EPA is failing
to set GHG emission standards which are required in the CAA. This failure regulate GHG
emissions is resulting in rising coastal waters which costs the State millions in relocating
expenditures. After the EPA argued that they did not have the authority to enforce GHG
emission standards for vehicles because that regulation is under the jurisdiction of the
Department of Transportation (DOT) under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, the court
responded, saying that because the DOT sets mileage standards in no way licenses EPA to shirk
its environmental responsibilities. EPA has been charged with protecting the publics health
and welfare, 42 U.S.C. 7521(a)(1), a statutory obligation wholly independent of DOTs
mandate to promote energy efficiency (Massachusetts vs. EPA, 2006). In addition to this
definition of responsibility of the EPA, the court's final ruling permanently changed the political
perception of the effects of GHG on global climate change; "The harms associated with climate
change are serious and well recognized. The Governments own objective assessment of the
relevant science and a strong consensus among qualified experts indicate that global warming
threatens, a precipitate rise in sea levels, severe and irreversible changes to natural ecosystems,
significant reduction in winter snowpack with direct and important economic consequences, and
increases in the spread of disease and the ferocity of weather events" (Massachusetts vs. EPA,
2006). Although the final court ruling never required that the EPA make mandatory GHG
emission standards, it did define greenhouse gases as air pollutants for the purposes of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). The court then gave time to the EPA administrator to "determine whether or not
emissions of greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines cause or
contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare, or whether the science is too uncertain for EPA to make a reasoned decision"(EPA,
NHTSA, 2010, p. 8). After the EPA administrator released a proposal of it's findings for a 60day public comment period during which over 380,000 comments were considered, the
Administrator responded to the Court's remand by issuing two findings under section 202(a) of
the Clean Air Act.
Baker 11
First, "the Administrator found that the current and projected concentrations of the six key wellmixed greenhouse gases -- carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O),
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) -- in the
atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations" (EPA,
NHTSA, 2010, p. 8).
This is referred to as the 'endangerment finding'
Second, "the Administrator found that the combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse
gases from new motor vehicle and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the greenhouse gas
pollution which threatens public health and welfare" (EPA, NHTSA, 2010, p. 8).
This is referred to as the 'cause or contribute finding'
After extensive examinations of scientific evidence and reviews of public contributions, the EPA
found that today's "science compellingly supports a positive finding that atmospheric
concentrations of these greenhouse gases result in air pollution which may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger both public health and welfare" (EPA, NHTSA, 2010, p. 8).
This historic finding defined GHG as being a danger to "both public health and welfare", which
gives both the DOT and EPA the responsibility of mitigating these consequences of
transportation emissions.
President Obama Announces National Fuel Efficiency Policy
On May 19th, 2009 Obama made history by setting in motion a new national policy aimed at
both increasing fuel economy and reducing greenhouse gas pollution for all new cars and trucks
sold in the United States. The new standards, covering model years 2012-2016, and ultimately
requiring an average fuel economy standard of 35.5 mpg in 2016, are projected to save 1.8
billion barrels of oil over the life of the program with a fuel economy gain averaging more than 5
percent per year and a reduction of approximately 900 million metric tons in greenhouse gas
emissions (The White House, 2009). This is the most significant plan of the federal government
to regulate and reduce GHG emissions by improving both the fuel economy of vehicles sold in
the U.S. and the sources of energy for these vehicles through the "collaboration between the
Department of Transportation (DOT), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the worlds
largest auto manufacturers, the United Auto Workers, leaders in the environmental community,
the State of California, and other state governments" (The White House, 2009). The policy also
simplifies standards for the public and manufacturers by setting the standard under one name
rather than separate standards required by DOT, EPA, and California agencies individually.
EPA and NHTSA Finalize Historic National Program to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Improve
Fuel Economy for Cars and Trucks
Detailed in an April 2010 EPA regulatory announcement, in one of the most complex and
cohesive collaborations between separate federal agencies, the Environmental Protection Agency
Baker 12
Over 2012-2016 with the joint EPA and NHTSA standards, this national program is expected to
reduce "GHG emissions from the U.S. light-duty fleet by approximately 21 percent by 2030 over
the level that would occur in the absence of the national program". Figure 9 provides specific
emission compliance levels. When considering all of the GHG emissions in the US, 31% of them
come from mobile sources, and out of these mobile sources light cars and truck "are responsible
for nearly 60 percent" of the GHG emissions (EPA, NHTSA, 2010, p. 2-3). If the policy does
meet its goals, and if the EPA's emissions data is correct, by 2030 the policy would result in a
reduction of 18.6% in total U.S. GHG emissions. The EPA projects that the cost of upgrading the
emission technology of 2012-2016 vehicles as planned in the national program will cost under
$52 billion, while the benefits "are expected to be approximately $240 billion" (EPA, NHTSA,
2010, p. 2-3).
Figure 9
Baker 13
CONCLUSION
Earth's increasing rate of industry and population growth is quickening the rate at which
petroleum fuels are burned around the world. In the past century, the US has been a leader in
energy use policy, creating mandatory regulations to decrease smog emissions, increase the
efficiency of transportation fuel, and increase future vehicle's fuel efficiency in an effort to slow
oil imports, increase national security, and grow domestic industry. Recently, environmental
consequences from such widespread GHG and toxic gas emissions are emerging which threaten
the long term sustainability of such growth. Unfortunately the idea of climate change regulation
isn't popular with those in industry because solutions often involve costly technologies and new
regulations to abide by. Though the price to reduce emissions may be costly initially, this
internalization will end up being less expensive and more effective than scrambling to respond to
rising sea levels, the destruction of wildlife diversity and thus total biomass of the earth, ocean
acidification, increasingly violent weather, and increasing rates of disease.
RECOMENDATION
Another important consideration in enacting GHG and renewable fuel regulations is the reserve
of Earth's petroleum fuels; according to a study done by Shahriar Shafiee and Erkan Topal at the
University of Queensland, at the current rate of energy consumption, "coal reserves are available
up to 2112, and will be the only fossil fuel remaining after 2042" (Shafiee & Topal, 2008). This
means that at the calculated rate of consumption, after 2042, the reserves of both oil and natural
gas will be depleted.
However, recent advances in the political recognition of global climate change, and new U.S.
policies such as the revised renewable fuel standards and historical 'New National Program to
Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Improve Fuel Economy for Cars and Trucks', shows the world a
small step in the right direction.
Baker 14
References
110th Congress, Public Law 110-140, Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ140/pdf/PLAW-110publ140.pdf
Clean Air Act 1990-2020 full report from
http://www.epa.gov/air/sect812/feb11/fullreport.pdf
Demirbas, Ayhan. (2006). Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Progress in Energy and
Combustion Science 33 (2007) 118
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360128506000256
Energy policy act of 2005, from
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ58/pdf/PLAW-109publ58.pdf
Historic EPA regulatory announcement, cooperation between EPA and DOT
http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/regulations/420f09047a.pdf
Massachusetts v. EPA, (2006), CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT MASSACHUSETTS ET AL.v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ET AL. Retrieved from
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1120.pdf
Patzek & Pimentel (2005). Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood;
Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower: Natural Resources Research, Vol.
14, No. 1, March 2005
http://www.c4aqe.org/Economics_of_Ethanol/ethanol.2005.pdf
Report to Congress, DOE. (2008). Review of Energy Policy Act of 1992 Programs and the
Alternative Fuel Provider Fleet Mandate.
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/epact/pdfs/704_report_final.pdf
Shafiee, S., Topal, E. (2008). When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? School of
Engineering and CRC Mining, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia Qld.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421508004126
The White House, Office of the press secretary. (2009, May 19). President Obama Announces
National Fuel Efficiency Policy. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pressoffice/president-obama-announces-national-fuel-efficiency-policy
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1999). Phase II Reformulated Gasoline: The
next step toward cleaner air.[Pamphlet].
http://www.epa.gov/oms/eparfg.pdf
Baker 15
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2007). Federal Fleet Requirements. Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/43500.pdf
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). (2005). Clean Cities: Low-Level Ethanol Fuel Blends
[Fact Sheet]. Office of Weatherization
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy05osti/37135.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, (2009) Federal Register, Endangerment and Cause or
Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act;
Final Rule, http://epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment/downloads/Federal_RegisterEPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0171-Dec.15-09.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA). (2010). EPA and NHTSA Finalize Historic National Program
to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Improve Fuel Economy for Cars and Trucks (EPA420-F-10-014). Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Retrieved from
http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/regulations/420f10014.pdf
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Transportation and Air Quality, New
Regulation proposal for the National Renewable Fuel Standard Program for 2010 and
Beyond. (2009). http://www.epa.gov/oms/renewablefuels/420f09023.pdf
Baker 16
Baker 17