Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Auditor
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
CSR
4.2.4
4.5.4
10
5.5.1
4.4.1
11
5.5.1
4.4.1
Result
RecordControl
Document Control
Title
Whether Responsibility & Authority of they established and known to the personnel?
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
Rev.No. 1
Auditor
Auditee
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
12
CSR
13
5.5.3
14
6.3.2
Internal
Contingency Communicat Responsibility & Authority
ion
Title
Date
Department
What to look for
Result
Are they Identified & defined responsible person for updating PTDB?
Whether they has established the internal communication regarding internal rejection, customer
complaints / rejection, online rejection, Process audit observations and Product audit
observations ?
Whether they has established the contingency plan for the critical measuring equipments &
Replacement plan for key Inspection activities?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
15
6.2.2.2
Do they have a defined guideline for training to ensures that competent personnel performing
work affecting product quality?
16
6.2.2.2
Is competency requirements are defined on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills &
experience?
17
6.2.2.2
18
6.2.2.2
19
6.2.2.2
20
6.2.2.2
Do they have sufficient training records such as attendance sheet, class room / theoretical test
questionnaires & evaluation sheet?
21
6.2.2.2
Do they have defined qualification criteria for each skill & are they updated the skill matrix
accordingly?
22
7.3.3.2
Whether they have guide line for preparing the Process FMEA & Control plan & Is it developed
according to AIAG manual?
23
CSR
Is all potential failure modes & it's effects in all stages are considered & developed?
(Next process, Subsequent Process, Customer & End user)
24
CSR
Are they considered maximum Severity, Occurrence and minimum value of Detection, while
calculating RPN?
Title
Result
Are they identified the training needs based on the competency requirements & is training plan
developed accordingly?
Do they have a training aids / materials each topic / skill wise & is it updated regularly?
Are they carried out the training as per the plan or not?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
25
7.3.3.2
Do they considered the PTDB, while preparation of PFMEA & Is PTDB updated regularly?
26
CSR
Are they maintained cause wise/defect wise internal rejection data , customer complaint data &
Based on the real data the occurrence rating calculated or not?
27
CSR
Are they reviewed & updated the occurrence rating (Matrix) as per the defined frequency?
28
7.3.3.2
Is SOD rating & Identification of CC/SC characteristics are as per the latest AIAG FMEA
guideline / WI for FMEA?
29
CSR
Do they have a defined RPN reduction rules based on SOD matrix, SO & Is action initiated
accordingly to reduce the RPN??
30
CSR
Ia all the above check points are addressed in PFMEA review check list to avoid the missing of
any important points & are they utilized the same?
31
CSR
Is PFMEA periodical review frequency defined & Is it updated regularly as when required?
32
7.3.3.2
33
CSR
Are they defined a standard like QFD to decide the product - process characteristic relation
shipmatrix?
34
7.3.3.2
Do they have a phase wise control plan? (Proto type, Pre-launch & production)& adequate
control methods defined accordingly?
ontrol Plan
FMEA
Title
Result
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
35
CSR
36
CSR
Are they reviewed the control plan accordingly change in control methods?
37
7.3.3.2
Is Control plan periodical review frequency defined & Is it updated regularly as when required?
38
7.3.3.2
Is CP check list to avoid the missing of any important points & are they utilized the same?
Control Plan
Title
Result
Are they defined the guideline to change control method according to change in the gravity?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
39
7.4.3.1
40
7.4.3.1
41
7.4.3.1
42
7.4.3.1
43
7.4.3.1
44
7.6.2
Result
Whether they have defined mechanism for carrying out incoming inspection ?
Is all purchased materials are verified as per control plan & sufficient inspection records
available? (ie.supplier & Internal - TC)
Are adequate receiving inspection and test facilities, equipment, standards & workmanship
provided and used for the required inspections and tests?
Are they maintained SCAR register & Effectiveness of SCAR being monitored?
Whether they have defined mechanism for carrying out calibration and is it covered,
a) All the monitoring & measuring Instruments / equipments?
b) Calibration frequency (based on what)?
c) Method of calibration, environment condition & qualification of personnel ? (for In-house
calibration)
d) Acceptance criteria?
e) Correction in case of out of tolerance situation?
Calibration
45
7.6.2
Title
S. No.
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
46
7.6.2
47
7.6.2
Do they have sufficient records of calibration & is it verified before release of instruments for
usage?
48
7.6.3.2
Is your calibration lab accredited to or meet the intent of ISO/IEC 17025 or national equivalent?
49
7.6.3.1
Do they have lab scope of calibration lab, Master instruments calibration certificates to prove the
traceability to international or national standards?
50
7.6.2
Do they have any positive recall methods to identify the previous measurement results &
notification to customer when suspected parts delivered, if in the case of MMD out of calibration
situation?
Calibration
Title
Result
Do they have a plan for calibration & are they calibrated the MMD as per plan or not?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
51
7.6.1
Do they have a plan for MSA & are they conducted the study as per plan or not?
52
7.6.1
Are they used appropriate statistical MSA study methods to qualify (R&R, Bias, Linearity,
Stability) & do they have sufficient records for it?
53
7.6.1
Do they have any periodical verification & preventive maintenance methods to ensure the
condition of MMD? (apart from periodic calibration activity)
54
8.2.2.2 /
8.2.2.3
Whether they have defined mechanism for carrying out the process / product audit?
55
CSR
Are they carried out D/TLD audit as per the defined frequency
(for VW parts)?
56
8.2.2.2 /
8.2.2.3
57
8.2.2.2 /
8.2.2.3
58
8.2.2.2 /
8.2.2.3
59
8.2.2.2 /
8.2.2.3
MSA
Title
Result
Do they have annual audit schedule & is it covered all manufacturing process / products?
Whether they have a defined criteria for selection of auditors & sufficient qualification records
maintained for it?
Are they carried out the process / product audit as per schedule & do they have sufficient
records for it?
Are they maintained audit concern register & status and effectiveness of CAPA being monitored
& tracked?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
60
8.2.3
61
8.2.3
62
8.2.3
63
8.2.4
Whether they have defined mechanism for carrying out in-process inspection ?
64
8.2.4
Whether they identified appropriate sampling plans, measuring techniques , for acceptance of
product at appropriate stages of product realization & is it effectively followed?
65
8.2.4
Are adequate In-process inspection and test facilities, equipment, standards & workmanship
provided and used for the same?
66
8.2.4
67
8.2.4.2
68
8.2.4
Are they have defined mechanism to communicate the quality concerns during product
realization stages
69
8.2.4
Are they maintained quality concern register & Effectiveness being monitored?
In-Process Inspection
Title
Result
Whether they has established the process measures which affect the customer requirements?
Whether the product conformity is done by authorized personnel & Qualification records
available?
Whether they has established appropriate resources ( lighting norms ) for evaluating
appearance items ? Ex: Master samples ( For color , texture , Distinctness of Image)
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
70
8.2.4.1
71
8.2.4.1
72
8.2.4.1
73
8.2.4.1
Title
S. No.
Result
Whether they has identified a mechanism for carrying out layout & Functional testing?
Do they have plan for layout / functional testing & is it covered all products?
Are they carried out the layout inspection as per schedule & do they have sufficient records for
it?
Are they ensured for all dimensions, material specification , fit / functional requirements as
specified in drawing & engineering specification?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
EHS
Clause
Ref.
74
8.3.1
75
8.3.1
76
8.3.1
77
8.3.3
78
8.3.4
79
8.3.4
80
8.5.2
81
8.5.3
82
8.5.3
Title
Control of NC parts
TS
Clause
Ref.
Customer
In-House rejection analysis Customer waiver Informatio
n
S. No.
Result
Are they kept / stored the NC parts in Inspection area as per defined layout?
Whether they has identified a mechanism for informing customers if any NC prodcut is shipped ?
Whether they has established a mechanism for customer concession or deviation if any product
or manufacturing process is different from that which is currently approved ?
Whether they has having enough records for justifying the above ?
Are they monitored the effectiveness & recurrence at a defined timeline and is it effective?
Are they updated the relevant documents accordingly such as PFMEA,CP,PTDB, WI & etc.?
Are they identified & implemented the horizontal deployment for similar process / products?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
83
CSR
84
CSR
85
CSR
86
CSR
Title
S. No.
Result
Are they defined the alarm level for No. of claim /month, Modelwise, production monthwise,
customerwise, Dealerwise, kilometerwise, defectwise & NTF?
Are they updated the Market claim information record & Warranty return analysis monitoring
sheet periodically?
Are they carried out the action planbased on the alarm level?
Do they have defined phenomenawise analysis flow, with the associated method and the tool
used?
For example (Water leakage), first I perform a visual check, How? With which master sample to
compare / 2nd if OK I perform dimensional check, method to be used and tools to be used +
specification
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
87
8.5.2
Whether they have a defined guideline to carry out corrective & preventive actions for customer /
warranty concerns?
88
CSR
Are they defined the timeline for each step of cause analysis from containment action, CAPA
implementation, Standardization etc.
89
8.5.2
Are they identified the root cause analysis by using problem solving techniques such as brain
storming, cause & effect diagram, why-why analysis & etc and are they validated the potential
root cause?
90
CSR
Are they validated possible causes through observation, trials to arrive at probable causes?
91
CSR
92
8.5.2
93
8.5.2
94
CSR
Are they updated the relevant documents accordingly such as PFMEA,CP,PTDB, WI & etc. & do
they have check list?
95
8.5.3
Are they identified & implemented the horizontal deployment for similar process / products?
Title
Result
Are they used QC tools such as why why analysis for deriving root causes for Occurrence &
Escape?
Are they implemented the suitable corrective actions with in defined timeline?
Are they monitored the effectiveness & recurrence at a defined timeline and is it effective?
Rev.No. 1
Customer /
Auditor
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
96
8.5.2
Title
Result
Are they monitored / improved the lead to response / close the quality concerns raised by
customer within timeline as defined by customer?
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor NonConformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
CSR
4.2.4
4.5.4
10
4.3.1
11
4.3.1
Title
Record Control
Document Control
Hazard identification
& Risk assesment
TS
S. No. Clause
Are aspects/impacts & hazards/risks identified and Significant study conducted as per the rating
guidelines?
Are study reports reviewed and updated for
-After implementation of Objectives (Management Program)
-After occurrence of any accident / emergency
Result
Auditee
Department
Title
12
4.3.3
13
5.5.1
4.4.1
14
5.5.1
4.4.1
15
5.5.3
16
CSR
17
CSR
18
6.2.2.2
Do they have a defined guideline for training to ensures that competent personnel performing
work affecting product quality & Including EHS related skills?
19
6.2.2.2
Do they have a competent personnel performing significant activities related to EHS interms of
education, training, skills and experience?
20
6.2.2.2
Is competency requirements are defined on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills &
experience?
21
6.2.2.2
Are they identified the training needs based on the competency requirements & is training plan
developed accordingly?
Internal Communication
opment
TS
S. No. Clause
Responsibility &
Authority
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Objectives
& Target
Auditor
Is EHS Management Programs made for all EHS objectives and implemented?
Whether Responsibility & Authority of they established and known to the personnel?
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
1.Whether they has established the internal communication regarding
Internal rejection status & action plan, Productivity, Safety, Customer dissatisfactions, Process
audit observations and Product audit observations ?
Are they displayed the quality result graph like customer ppm trend, in-house ppm trend , pareto
chart, daily rejection monitoring chart?.
Are they displayed the monthly trends & action plan status with target dates, responsibility &
status at the communication area?
Result
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
22
6.2.2.2
23
6.2.2.2
24
6.2.2.2
Are they carried out Theoritical / Practical evaluation of the operator after training?
25
6.2.2.2
Do they have sufficient training records such as attendance sheet, class room / theoretical test /
practical test questionnaires & evaluation sheet?
26
6.2.2.2
Do they have defined qualification criteria for each skill & are they updated the skill matrix
accordingly each operator-wise?
27
6.2.2.2
Are they carried out the operator observation after training to evaluate the effectiveness of
training program & is it includes re-training?
28
6.3.2
Contingency
Date
Whether they has established the contingency plan for the Key equipments failure, Manpower
shortage, Material shoratge, Delivery failure?
29
6.4.2
5S
Auditor
Are they following & maintained the work place environment based on 3C & 5S concepts?
Title
Training & Development
TS
S. No. Clause
Do they have a training aids / materials each topic / skill wise & is it updated regularly?
Are they carried out the training as per the plan or not?&
Is it effective?
Result
Auditee
Department
Title
30
7.5.1
31
4.4.6
32
4.4.6
33
4.4.6
34
4.4.6
35
7.5.1.6
36
7.5.1.6
37
7.5.1.6
Whether they have established the OCP for smooth functioning of the EHS process?
Operational Control
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Is Operational control effective to control situations where their absence could lead to deviations
from the EHS policy and the objectives?
Whether the OCP's are derived from EHS risk assesment study & is it linked?
Is it accessible for use at work station?
Is activity performing by the personnel effectively adhered to OCP &
Are PPEs effectively used, wherever required?
Production Planning
TS
S. No. Clause
Control of production
Auditor
Are they have material requirement plan considering the rolling plan & stock availability?
Is production planned according to customer requirements?
Are they monitoring the production plan vs. actual & Suitable action initiated in case of non
achievement?
Result
Date
Auditee
Department
7.5.1.2
39
7.5.1.2
40
7.5.1.3
41
7.5.1.3
42
7.5.1.3
43
7.5.2
44
CSR
45
CSR
Work Instruction
38
Title
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Process Validation
TS
S. No. Clause
Whether they have established the work instructions for smooth functioning of the process?
Whether the work instructions are derived from control plan & is it linked?
Is it accessible for use at work station?
When and how the Job Setups are verified? Are statistical methods used during verification,
where applicable?
Are they conducted trials, with details of product characteristics achieved as an output for
different values and different combinations of process parameters?
Are they conducted the feasibility review and record for the same has to be maintained for all
the process change identified?
Result
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
46
CSR
47
CSR
48
CSR
49
CSR
50
CSR
Are they have defined criteria for conducting PPAP for process changes i.e. for which changes
PPAP is required from customer & Internal?
51
CSR
Do they have approved internal / customer PSW copy & records for all changes related to
process?
52
7.5.3
53
7.5.3
54
7.5.3
55
8.2.3
Title
Whether they checked all the possible risks including stock loss, quality crisis, equipment / tool
break downs, non achievement of timing plan etc and actions to be planned for the same?
surement
Identification & Traceability
.
TS
S. No. Clause
Are they prepared the list of process / plant related changes and progress control tracked or
not?
Are they tracked the progress of the each action related to the change including the relevant
document updation and implementation?
Are they monitored the effectiveness of actions implemented (i.e. comparison of pre and post
change data like rejection, Cp/ CpK values etc)
Do you have a documented process for the identification of products throughout product
realization process by means of unique identification of the products?
Is product status identified with respect to monitoring and measurement requirements?
Is product traceability system followed & Is it traceable from delivery to receipt of child parts?
Whether they has established the process measures such as set-up & process rejections at all
manufacturing stages,Machine utilization, OEE?
Result
Auditee
Department
TS
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
56
8.2.3
57
8.2.3
S. No. Clause
Auditor
Title
Result
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
58
8.2.3.1
59
8.2.3.1
Whether they has corrective action plan ( should include specific time and assigned
responsibilities to assure process becomes stable or capable ) for characters whose CpK is less
than 1.33 ?
60
8.2.3.1
61
CSR
62
CSR
63
CSR
Are they defined and performed the retroactive confirmation for the NC's related to safety
parameters?
64
CSR
Are they trained all the operators for the defined NC handling for safety parameters?
Title
TS
S. No. Clause
Are they recording the significant process events such as machine / parameter adjustment, tool
change or machine repair?
Are they Identified Special / Critical characteristics on all relevant documents?
Are they maintained specific recording sheet, action sheet for NC's related to safety
parameters?
Result
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
65
CSR
Whether they have identified a mechanism for control of non conforming product with time line &
responsibility?
66
CSR
Are they given training to all operators for NC handling based on defined guideline?
67
8.3.1
68
CSR
69
8.3.1
70
CSR
71
CSR
72
8.3.1
Work instructions are accessible to the employees doing re-working and is it displayed?
73
8.3.1
Are they maintained the rework register up to date & are action includes the corrective action?
74
CSR
Are they established a system to cross check the number of parts in the non conformity box
with the number of defects in the record?
75
CSR
Title
Unusual" product
and equipment
situation
TS
S. No. Clause
Do they have defined shift wise / day wise defective targets in order to control the out flow of
defect and take immediate corrective action?
Whether they has identified a mechanism for control of reworked product such as list of rework
able & non rework able defects with rework instructions?
Is acceptance criteria after rework defined & adhered accordingly?
Are they Identified the area for rework & is it secured against part-mix up with regular lot?
Result
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
76
CSR
77
8.4.1
78
8.5.1.1
79
8.5.1.2
80
8.5.2
81
8.5.2
82
8.5.2
83
8.5.2
Title
Whether they has identified a mechanisn for manufacturing process improvement to control &
reduce variation in product characteristics & Process parameters ?
Whether they have a defined guideline to carry out, In-house concern analysis?
In-House rejection analysis
TS
S. No. Clause
Manufacturing
"Unusual" product
Continual
Analysis of
Process
and equipment
Improvement
data
Improvement
situation
Auditor
Are they carried out the quality review meeting internally at a defined frequency along with
CFT?
Do they have register for In-house concerns & are they monitored the progress status and
reviewed periodically?
Are they identified the root cause analysis by using problem solving techniques such as cause &
effect diagram, why-why analysis & etc and are they validated the potential root cause?
Result
TS
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
8.5.2
S. No. Clause
84
85
8.5.2 &
8.5.3
Auditee
Title
Date
Department
What to look for
Are they implemented the suitable corrective actions with in defined timeline?
Corrective &
Preventive action
Auditor
Whether they has initiated the corrective action for the non conformities observed during?
1) Negative Trends of the Process Measures
2) Not able to achieve the established targets
3) Internal NCRs raised from the interrelated departments
4) IQA NCRs
5) External Audit Findings
Result
Date
Auditee
Department
TS
S. No. Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
Result
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor NonConformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
Objective Evidence
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
5.5.1
4.4.1
Title
Result
Record Control
Document Control
Responsibility &
Authority
Whether Responsibility & Authority of they established and known to the personnel?
Rev.No. 1
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
10
5.5.1
4.4.1
11
5.5.3
12
6.3.2
Internal
Responsibility &
Contingency Communicat
Authority
ion
Auditee
Title
Result
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
Whether they has established the internal communication regarding material requirements,
Performance status, Supplier APQP status & etc?
Whether they has established the contingency plan for purchasing materials?
Rev.No. 1
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
13
7.4.1
Is there a documented procedure for selection, evaluation & re-evaluation of suppliers & is it
followed?
14
7.4.1
Whether they have evaluated and selected the supplier based on their ability to supply product
prior to release of product?
15
7.4.1
16
7.3.6.3
Are they monitoring the sub-supplier APQP readiness review & state the frequency?
17
7.3.6.3
18
7.4.1
When issuing purchase orders, is supplier quality history considered in continuing operations
with the supplier?
19
7.4.1
Whether they have a supplier audit schedule and are they conducted periodic supplier
assessment to conform the quality performance? (State the frequency)
20
7.4.1
Whether they have any defined mechanism for sub-supplier change management to obtain your
approval prior to implementation of any changes?
Purchasing process
Title
Result
Is product and process approval procedure is (eg PPAP) applied to suppliers / subcontractors
Rev.No. 1
21
7.4.1.2
22
7.4.1.3
23
7.4.2
24
7.4.2
25
7.4.2
26
7.4.3.2
27
7.4.3.2
Title
Purchasing Information
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Supplier Monitoring
TS
Clause
Ref.
Supplier
Customer
QMS
approved
developme
Sources
nt
S. No.
Result
Whether the organization is purchasing the product , materials , or services from customer
approved sources ?
Whether purchase order consists of all relevant information about the product ?
Are purchasing information including EHS requirements adequately communicated to the
suppliers / subcontractors through purchase order or through work order / LETTER?
Is adequacy of purchase document reviewed and approved prior to release to suppliers?
Is there a documented supplier rating system, which includes
a) Delivered Product quality
b) customer disruptions including field returns
c) Delivery schedule performance
d) Premium Freight?
Are supplier ratings recorded, communicated back to the supplier, and appropriate action plans
obtained from poor performing suppliers?
Rev.No. 1
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
28
8.5.2 &
8.5.3
29
8.2.3
30
8.2.3
31
8.2.3
S. No.
Corrective &
Preventive action
Auditee
What to look for
Result
Whether they has initiated the corrective action for the non conformities observed during?
1) Negative Trends of the Process Measures
2) Not able to achieve the established targets
3) Internal NCRs raised from the interrelated departments
4) IQA NCRs
5) External Audit Findings
Whether they has established the process measures such as Supplier PPM, %Supplier rating in
A grade, No.of premium freight & etc?
Rev.No. 1
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
Result
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor Nonconformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.3.1
10
4.3.1
Title
Result
Record Control
Document Control
Are aspects/impacts & hazards/risks identified and Significant study conducted as per the rating
guidelines?
Are study reports reviewed and updated for
-After implementation of Objectives (Management Program)
-After occurrence of any accident / emergency
Rev.No. 1
Auditee
Department
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
11
4.3.3
12
5.5.1
4.4.1
13
5.5.1
4.4.1
Responsibility &
Authority
S. No.
Objectives
& Target
Auditor
Result
Is EHS Management Programs made for all EHS objectives and implemented?
Whether Responsibility & Authority of they established and known to the personnel?
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
Rev.No. 1
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
14
5.5.3
15
6.2.2.2
16
6.2.2.2
17
6.2.2.2
18
6.3.2
19
6.4.2
5S
Date
20
7.5.1.2
Work
Instructio
n
Auditor
21
7.5.1.6
22
7.5.1.6
Internal
Contingency Training & Development Communicatio
n
Production Planning
Title
Result
Are they carried out the training as per the plan or not?
Do they have a defined guideline for training to ensures that competent personnel performing
work affecting product quality & Including EHS related skills?
Is competency requirements are defined on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills &
experience?
Whether they has established the contingency plan for the Key equipments failure, Manpower
shortage, Material shortage, Delivery failure?
Are they following & maintained the work place environment based on 3C & 5S concepts?
Whether they have established the work instructions for smooth functioning of the process?
Are they have material requirement plan considering the rolling plan & stock availability?
Rev.No. 1
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
23
7.5.1.6
24
4.4.6
25
4.4.6
26
4.4.6
27
4.4.6
Title
Department
Danesh (for material planning)
Result
Are they monitoring the production plan vs actual & suitable action initiated in case of nonachievement?
Whether they have established the OCP for smooth functioning of the EHS process?
Operational Control
Auditee
Production Planning
Auditor
Is Operational control effective to control situations where their absence could lead to deviations
from the EHS policy and the objectives?
Whether the OCP's are derived from EHS risk assessment study & is it linked?
Is it accessible for use at work station?
Is activity performing by the personnel effectively adhered to OCP &
Are PPEs effectively used, wherever required?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
28
7.5.5.1
Whether they have defined mechanism for the receipt of all Bought out parts, consumables, &
Packing materials ?
29
7.5.5.1
Whether they have identified a mechanism for identification, handling , storage and protection of
the product ?(Stores Layout)
30
7.5.3
31
7.5.3
32
7.5.5.1
33
7.5.5.1
34
7.5.5.1
35
7.5.5.1
Whether they have identified a location for keeping waiting for inspection & non confirmed
material ?
36
7.5.5.1
Do they have a defined location for packing & storage of FG parts & is it secured to avoid mixup of SFG / NC parts?
37
7.5.1.2
Do they have defined packaging instructions (parts wise) & is it being followed accordingly?
Title
Result
Is all the materials are having valid identification tag with approval status?
Is all the Raw materials / Child parts are traceable, till supplier traceability details?
Are they preserved the materials from dust, damage, deformation & etc?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
38
7.5.5.1
39
7.5.3
40
7.5.3
41
7.5.5
Are they preserved the materials from dust, damage, deformation & etc?
42
Are they delivered the materials as per the customer schedules & are they monitoring the
delivery performance?
Title
Result
Are they implemented the FIFO mechanism for all parts in stock?
Is all the materials are having valid identification tag with approval status?
Is all the SFG / FG PFT's are traceable, till supplier traceability details?
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor Nonconformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
Title
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.3.1
10
4.3.1
11
4.3.3
RecordControl
Document Control
Result
Objectives
& Target
Hazard
identification &
Risk assesment
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
Title
Responsibility &
Authority
S. No.
5.5.1
4.4.1
13
5.5.1
4.4.1
14
5.5.3
15
6.2.2.2
Do they have a defined guideline for training to ensures that competent personnel performing
work affecting product quality & Including EHS related skills?
16
6.2.2.2
Do they have a competent personnel performing significant activitites related to EHS interms of
education, training, skills and experience?
17
6.2.2.2
Is competency requirements are defined on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills &
experience?
18
6.2.2.2
19
6.2.2.2
20
6.2.2.2
Internal
Communicatio
n
12
Result
Whether Responsibility & Authority of they established and known to the personnel?
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
Are they identified the training needs based on the competency requirements & is training plan
developed accordingly?
Do they have a training aids / materials each topic / skill wise & is it updated regularly?
Are they carried out the training as per the plan or not?
Rev.No. 1
Auditee
S. No.
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
Auditor
Title
21
6.2.2.2
Do they have sufficient training records such as attendance sheet, class room / theoretical test
questionnaires & evaluation sheet?
22
6.2.2.2
Do they have defined qualification criteria for each skill & are they updated the skill matrix
accordingly?
23
6.2.2.2
Are they carried out the operator observation after training to evaluate the effectiveness of
training program & is it includes re-training?
Result
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
6.3.2
25
6.3.2
26
6.3.2
27
6.4.2
28
4.4.6
29
4.4.6
30
4.4.6
31
4.4.6
Contingency
24
Title
Result
Whether they has established the contingency plan for the Key equipments & Production tools,
Manpower shortage & Power failure ?
Are they defined the critical spare list? & Is it effective?
Are they monitored & maintained the critical spare list & availablity?
5S
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
Are they following & maintained the work place environment based on 3C & 5S concepts?
Whether they have established the OCP for smooth functioning of the EHS process?
Operational Control
S. No.
Is Operational control effective to control situations where their absence could lead to deviations
from the EHS policy and the objectives?
Whether the OCP's are derived from EHS risk assesment study & is it linked?
Is it accessible for use at work station?
Is activity performing by the personnel effectively adhered to OCP &
Are PPEs effectively used, wherever required?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
Title
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
Whether they have defined mechanism for carrying out Break down & Preventive maintenance?
33
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
Do they have a plan for preventive maintenance & are they carried out the PM as per plan or
not?
34
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
Are they maintained machines in good condition & is it consistent to produce good quality
products? (Check for oil / water / air leakages)
35
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
36
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
37
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
38
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
Are they maintained machine / equipment history card & is it updated regularly?
39
7.5.1.4
4.4.6
Is predictive maintenance method utilized to continually improve the effectiveness and efficiency
of the production equipment?
40
7.5.1.5
Whether they identified defined Identification & storage mechanism of production tools?
41
7.5.1.5
Are they stored the production tools as per the defined storage mechanaism & is it identifiable
easily?
42
7.5.1.5
Control of machineries
32
Result
Are they carrying out the machine capability study for important characteristics and process
parameters & is it capable?
Are they installed any Poka yoke system to prevent / detect the failure in station? (Pls specify
the details)
Whether they have a defined mechanism to verify the functioning of Poka Yoke & are they
followed accordingly?
Rev.No. 1
Auditee
S. No.
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
43
7.5.1.5
44
7.5.1.5
45
7.5.1.5
46
7.5.1.5
Auditor
Title
Department
What to look for
Result
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
47
7.5.4
48
7.5.4
49
7.6.2
50
7.6.2
51
7.6.2
52
7.6.2
53
7.6.3.2
Title
Customer
property
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
S. No.
Result
Is all customer proprties are identified permeantly & is it legible & Identifiable easily?
Whether they have defined mechanism for carrying out calibration and is it covered,
a) All the monitoring & measuring Instruments / equipments?
b) Calibration frequency (based on what)?
c) Method of calibration, environment condition & qualification of personnel ? (for In-house
calibration)
d) Acceptance criteria?
e) Correction in case of out of tolerance situation?
Do they have any defined unique identification methods to identify,
a) Identification No.
b) calibration status?
c) Validity of calibration?
D) MMD does not require calibration?
Do they have a plan for calibration & are they calibrated the MMD as per plan or not?
Do they have sufficient records of calibration & is it verified before release of instruments for
usage?
Is your calibration lab accredited to or meet the intent of ISO/IEC 17025 or national equivalent?
Rev.No. 1
Calibration of monitorin
Auditor
Auditee
S. No.
54
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
7.6.3.1
Title
Result
Do they have lab scope of calibration lab, Master instruments calibration certificates to prove the
traceability to international or national standards?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
55
8.2.3
56
8.2.3
57
8.2.3
58
8.5.1.1
59
8.5.2 &
8.5.3
60
8.5.2 &
8.5.3
Title
Continual Monitoring and Measurement
Improvement
of Process.
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
S. No.
Result
Whether they has established the process measures such as MTBF, MTTR, No. of Break downs
& Machine availability % ?
Whether they has initiated the corrective action for the non conformities observed during?
1) Negative Trends of the Process Measures
2) Not able to achieve the established targets
3) Internal NCRs raised from the interrelated departments
4) IQA NCRs
5) External Audit Findings
Are they carrying out the detailed cause analysis, corrective & preventive actions for the key
failures?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
EHS
TS Clause
Clause
Ref.
Ref.
Title
Result
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor NonConformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
5.5.1
4.4.1
10
5.5.1
4.4.1
Title
Result
RecordControl
Document Control
TS
S. No. Clause
Whether Responsibility & Authority of they established and known to the personnel?
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
11
7.2.1
12
7.2.1
13
7.2.2
14
7.2.3
15
8.2.1
16
8.2.1
Title
Customer satisfaction
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Review of
Customer
Determination of
requirements
communicati
requirements related to
related to the
on
the product
product
TS
S. No. Clause
Result
Does the organization determine customer requirements, including the delivery and postdelivery activities? (such as warranty claims collection, analyze)
Are customer specific requirements on management system received, reviewed & defined?
Are they reviewed the requirements related to the product prior to the organization's
commitment to supply a product to the customer? (such as documented as well as verbal
requirements)
Does the Organization conduct customer satisfaction survey (by internal data & getting
feedback from customer at a defined frequency?
Rev.No. 1
Department
TS
S. No. Clause
Ref.
17
18
8.2.3
8.5.2 &
8.5.3
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
Monitoring and
Measurement of
Process
Date
Corrective &
Preventive action
Auditor
Result
Whether they has initiated the corrective action for the non conformities observed in theys?
1) Negative Trends of the Process Measures
2) Not able to achieve the established targets
3) Internal NCRs raised from the interrelated departments
4) IQA NCRs
5) External Audit Findings
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor NonConformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
CSR
4.2.4
4.5.4
10
5.5.1
4.4.1
11
5.5.1
4.4.1
12
5.5.3
13
6.3.2
14
4.4.6
15
4.4.6
16
4.4.6
17
4.4.6
Record Control
Document Control
Title
Result
Objective Evidence
Internal
Responsibility &
Contingency Communicat
Authority
ion
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
Whether they has established the internal communication regarding internal rejection, Testing
results, Product development status ?
Whether they has established the contingency plan for the Equipments in the organization ?
Whether they have established the OCP for smooth functioning of the EHS process?
Operational Control
TS
S. No. Clause
Is Operational control effective to control situations where their absence could lead to deviations
from the EHS policy and the objectives?
Whether the OCP's are derived from EHS risk assesment study & is it linked?
Is it accessible for use at work station?
Is activity performing by the personnel effectively adhered to OCP &
Are PPEs effectively used, wherever required?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
18
7.1
19
7.1
Are they scheduled & conducted the mile stone review meeting to communicate launch status,
open issues to top management & sufficient records available or not?
20
7.3.4.1
21
7.1
22
CSR
Do they have effective communication matrix for the sharing or feedback to design reviews?
23
7.1
Do they have a mechanism for product and manufacturing process approval procedure
recognized by the customer ?
24
7.1.4
25
7.1.4
Do they have defined check list for manage and track the changes?
26
CSR
Are they conducted the feasibility & risk analysis along with CFT before initiating the changes?
27
7.1.4
28
7.1.4
29
7.1.4
Do they have a defined criteria for Internal / External PSW & Is it followed accordingly?
30
7.1.4
31
7.2.2.2
Change control:
Quality Planning
Title
MFG.
Feasibilit
y
TS
S. No. Clause
Result
Objective Evidence
Is phase wise quality targets through out APQP process defined & being monitored & analyzed?
Are the results of such reviews reported in Management review for progress on design & any
constraints of resources?
Are they considering experience from previous developments / projects & Lessons learned from
existing serial production ?
(i.e.. TGR / TGW)
Are they carried out manufacturing feasibility study , risk analysis for the proposed product ?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
32
7.3.1.1 &
7.2.1.1
33
7.3.5 &
7.3.6
34
8.1.1
Title
Design & dev. Multidisciplin
Statistical
-Verification &
ary
study
Validation
approach
TS
S. No. Clause
Result
Objective Evidence
Are they using Multi disciplinary approach to prepare for product realisation , Identifying the
special characterstics, Develop and review of FMEA's & While identifying actions to reduce
potential risks ?
Whether the organisation has determined a appropriate statistical tools at the time of APQP?
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor NonConformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.3.1
4.3.1
4.3.2
10
4.3.2
Title
Document Control
EHS
Clause
Ref.
RecordControl
TS
Clause
Ref.
Legal and
Hazard identification
other
& Risk assesment
requirements
S. No.
Result
Rev.No. 1
Auditee
Department
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
11
4.3.3
12
5.5.1
4.4.1
13
5.5.1
4.4.1
14
5.5.3
4.4.3
15
4.4.3
16
4.4.3
17
4.4.3
18
4.4.6
Internal
Communicat
ion
Participation & Consultation
Result
Is EHS Management Programs made for all EHS objectives and is it implemented effectively?
Whether Responsibility & Authority of they established and known to the personnel?
Is there KRA assigned for all personnel & is it linked with company objectives?
1.Whether the department has established the internal communication regarding Training
programs, General Instructions & Process Performance of the department. ?
Are employees participated & consulted for development & review of EHS Policy, Objectives,
Risk Assessment and further introduction of facilities, infrastructure, system etc
Is there any system that is implemented for internal and external communications to and from
interested parties?
Whether they have established the OCP for smooth functioning of the EHS process?
nal Control
Responsibility &
Authority
S. No.
Objectives
& Target
Auditor
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
19
4.4.6
20
4.4.6
21
4.4.6
22
4.4.7
23
4.4.7
24
6.2.1
4.4.2
25
6.2.1
4.4.2
26
6.2.2.2
4.4.2
27
6.2.2.2
4.4.2
28
6.2.2.2
4.4.2
Title
Operational Control
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Result
Is Operational control effective to control situations where their absence could lead to deviations
from the EHS policy and the objectives?
Whether the OCP's are derived from EHS risk assesment study & is it linked?
Is it accessible for use at work station?
Is activity performing by the personnel effectively adhered to OCP &
Are PPEs effectively used, wherever required?
Emergency
Prepardness &
response
TS
Clause
Ref.
S. No.
Do they have a competent personnel performing significant activitites related to EHS interms of
education, training, skills and experience?
Are they carried out the training as per the plan or not?
Do they have sufficient training records such as attendance sheet, class room / theoretical test
questionnaires & evaluation sheet?
Do they have defined qualification criteria for each skill & are they updated the skill matrix
accordingly?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
29
6.2.2.4
30
6.2.2.4
31
6.2.2.4
32
8.2.3
4.5.1
33
8.2.3
4.5.1
34
8.2.3
4.5.1
35
8.2.3
4.5.1
36
8.5.1.1
Title
Employee motivation and
empowerment
EHS
Clause
Ref.
TS
Clause
Ref.
Continual
Improvement
S. No.
Result
Are they monitoring the progress status of suggestions & recognization given for that?
Whether they has established the process measures such as attrition rate, Absentism rate,
employee satisfaction index & etc. ?
Are key characteristics of EHS performance defined, monitored & measured and related reports
maintained?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
Result
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor NonConformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Auditee
Department
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
4.1
4.1
Doc.Requi
Quality Manual
rements
S. No.
General
Auditor
4.2.2
4.4.4
4.2.1
4.4.4
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.3
4.4.5
4.2.4
4.5.4
4.2.4
4.5.4
10
4.2.4
4.5.4
Result
Whether the organization have documented procedures for all processes /departments?
RecordControl
Document Control
Rev.No. 1
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
11
4.2.4
4.5.4
12
5.3
4.2
13
5.4.1
4.3.3
14
5.4.1.1
Title
Department
What to look for
Result
S. No.
Auditee
RecordControl
Auditor
Whether the top management has ensured that the Quality policy?
a) is appropriate to the purpose of the organisation?
b) is providing a frame work for establishing and reviewing quality objectives ?
c) is reviewed for continuing suitability
Whether IMS Objectives & Targets Of they has been established based on qulaity policy?
Whether the Quality objectives and targets established are SMART ?
Whether Quality Objectives & Targets have been Monitored and achieved?
Rev.No. 1
Auditee
Department
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
17
5.5.3
18
5.6
4.6
19
5.6
4.6
20
5.6
4.6
21
5.6
4.6
22
8.2.2
4.5.5
23
8.2.2
4.5.5
24
8.2.2
4.5.5
25
8.2.2
4.5.5
26
8.2.2
4.5.5
Are corrective actions identified and implemented with in the target date for the nonconformities, if any?
Management Review
S. No.
Internal
Communicat
ion
Auditor
Result
1.Whether they has established the internal communication regarding IMS Policy, IMS
Objectives and targets, Internal Quality Audits , Audit observations , Non conformities observed
in the organisation , any changes in International Standards ?
Is management review meeting conducted as per the planned intervals & sufficient records
available?
Are follow-up actions from previous management review included & tracked for the progress?
Internal Audit
Is management review minutes maintained? Are outputs from management review identified?
Is internal audit conducted as per the plan and reports (Filled audit checklists) maintained?
Rev.No. 1
Date
Auditee
Department
S. No.
TS
Clause
Ref.
EHS
Clause
Ref.
Title
Result
Legands : O+ : Positive Point, C : Conformance, OI : Opportunities for Improvement, MIN.NC: Minor NonConformity, MAJ.NC : Major Non Conformity
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1
Objective Evidence
Rev.No. 1