Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
November
TAXATION
14,
2015
2.
Claim
for
refund
Government
1.
2. To make assessment to collect
correct
amount
of
taxes
Assignment
for
next
meeting:
Continue
on
review
RR 18-2013 on assessment amending...
Governs procedural due process of
making
assessment
Sec. 85 on exemptions - whether
usufruct retained is to be included in
gross
estate
Construction of tax laws, exemptions
and
prescription
Deadlines of filing of income tax
returns, percentage tax and VAT
Other actual bar questions (not graded)
In
registering,
there
must
be
classification as individual employee or
corporation
Once registered, tax obligation will be
determined whether to VAT, percentage
or
income
tax.
If estimate sales for the next year does
not exceed 1919500, percentage unless
taxpayer opt to be subjected to VAT
EWithholding tax or compensation
Final percentage tax applicable to....
Not
subject
to
VAT
Point of registration - tax tie
Then filing of tax returns follow
After filing, BIR has the authority to
evaluate the returns filed, whether
correct on its face or there are errors
on the face of the return, taxpayer
assessed immediately wihout need of
LOA
or
PAN
Can the taxpayer file income tax return
based on his own computation?
Taxes under the NIRC are considered
self-assessing taxes. It is the taxpayer
who will determine the tax to be filed
and paid, as a rule. Also means that
there is no need for BIR in order to
create a liability for tax of the
taxpayer. Exception: Sec. 6D of nirc
(authority
to
terminate
taxable
period); sec56B (assessment and
payment
of
defficiency
tax)
Liability and payment is presumed to
be correct and valid unless determined
by
BIR
as
otherwise.
If taxpayer do not know his correct
taxes to be paid, he should hire
accountant
or
lawyer.
How could BIR confirm correctness of
tX
dues
and
payments?
Section 6A, power of BIR to examine
returns
Can
withdraw?
No, but it can be change, amended or
modified, within 3 years from date of
filing. Provided further that for the
meantime, there is no notice of audit
or investigation of such return has been
made
by
BIR.
Is BIR mandated to examine all the
returns
filed?
No. The power to examine include the
power
not
to
examine.
If taxpayer fail to file and pay the tax,
but taxpayer is engaged in business,
can
bir
examine?
By filing a return in behalf of the
taxpayer, based on info gathered, after
then
examinatin
may
proceed.
Issuance of LOA - authorizing an agent
of BIR to conduct examinatin of
November
21,
2015
Section 76 applicable to individuals?
Yes. The options, as well as the
irrevocability are applicable. Form
1706(?)
sec.
25-56
Constructions:
If the law is clear and express, no room
for
construction
In case there is ambiguity, construction
of tax laws are construed strictly
sgainst the government and in favor of
the taxpayer. Exception: exemptions,
liberally in favor of the government
because they go against the lifeblood
doctrine.
GR: tax laws are construed strictly in
favor
of
the
taxpayer
Burdens are not to be imposed beyond
what the statutes clearly declare
XCPTN: see page 14 of UST
On
prescriptionIn favor of the taxpayer since only
remedial in nature. Phil Journalist v.
CIR
12/16/2004
GR
162852
A limitation on the part of the tax
administrator as to time of making
audit or subject taxpayer to their
power
Tax providing for prescription is usually
express
or
clear.
Whether house and transferred but
usufruct retained, included in the gross
estate?
As provided in Sec.85 of NIRC, still
included in the gross estate. As to
donor's tax, no qualification. If asked,
just determine if transfer is full and
adequate condieration in money or
money's
worth
DST within 5th days from execution of
document
of
t
CGT 30 days after the notarization
REGISTRATION WITH THE BUREAU
Tax
remedies:
1.
Protest
on
the
assessment
subjected
to
examination
and
insoection once in a taxable year.
Correct?
No. Article 235: GR: only once.
Exceptions include fraud, irregularity or
mistakes, as determined by the
commissioner.
The 5 exceptions pertain only to
income tax. Final withholding tax,
creditable withholding tax, under
category
of
income
tax.
2. Recall option to carryover excess
payments shall be irrevocable for both
individual
and
corporate.
3. Overview of registration and
issuance
of
loa
Starting
point:
loa
issuance
4. Power to make assessment and
prescribe additional reqs for tax admin
and sec 6 of nirc. Once return is filed,
cannot be withdrawn but can be
amended within 3 years provided no
notice of audit or investigation. To
commence from date of filing.
5. Power to investigate include power
not
to
investigate.
CIR v. Raul Gonzales. Taxpayer failed to
submit docs for investigation. Subpoena
duces ticum. Criminal case for failure
to obey. Tax evasion another case.
Defense was litis pendencia. Failure to
obey summon dependent upon result of
tax
evasion
case.
Tenable?
Held: different basis of criminal cases.
Both cases can be filed simultaneously.
Result of one case not dependent on
the result of the other case. Litis
pendencia not tenable as defense.
Philippine Journalist v. CIR (recited)
Income tax return for 1994. Filed on
time. RD issued LOA. Asked BIR to
instead extend period of prescription so
the corp will make a waiver of
prescription. BIR issued assessment dec
9,1998. Final notice nov 10, 1999.
Warrant of distraint march 20, 2000.
Petitioner contended prescription to
assess/examine has prescribed. Was loa
timely and validly issued? Aug 10,1995.
What were the type of taxes involved in
this case? Income tax, withholding tax,
vat. Three years prescriptive period
from date of filing or last date of
filing. Income tax return - April 15,
1995. Last date to assess should be
april
1998.
VAT
Take note of different dates of
deadlines
because
of,prescriptive
periods.
What were the reasons of cta in
nullifying the Loa? Invalid loa because
no date, waiver did not constitute that
petitioner received waiver and date not
indicated. PJI not furnished copy of the
waiver. SC: BIR cannot assess anymore
petitioner
because
not
within
prescriptive period. Because waiver
was
invalid.
Ma'am: aug 10, 1995 loa to assess 1994.
PJI executed a waiver. Basta read the
case
:D
Issuance of warrant equivalent to
denial
CTA: in favor of PJI but PJI is
petitioner. Why? Rule 45; Because
during this time, decision of CTA is still
to be reviewed by CA, which reversed
the
decision
of
the
CTA.
CA: jurisdiction. BIR said that CTA has
no jurisdiction to entertain. RA 1155.
Old jurisdiction law of CTA. In reversing
CTA, only decisions of BIR denying may
be appealed to the CTA. Mere
assessment becoming final are not
appealable.
Should
not
have
entertained the petitin at all. Waiver
was valid, no need to provide for
definite
period
of
investigation.
SC: on jurisdiction-CTA not limited to
matters relating to assessment or
refund only. RA 1125 covers other
cases. Warrant of distraint or levy is
covered
under
other
matters.
In reversing CA, the waiver is not a
waiver of the right to invoke defense of
prescription, what is being waived is
the right to... The execution of the
waiver pertain only to the period of
making an assessment, the three year
period to make assessment, but not the
prescription
itself.
A waiver of the statute of limitation is
a derogation of...must be carefully and
strictly construed against the party
claiming the validity of the waiver. Not
a waiver to invoke defense of
prescription, but only the period of
three years, which can be extended
within a certain period by reason of the
waiver. NIRC. Law on prescription
liberally construed in favor of the
taxpayer. Waiver is a bilateral act, to
be valid must be acts of two parties.
Basta lengthy discussion on the
decisions of CTA, CA and SC
CIR
v.
Kudos
metal
Prescriptive period and when to assess
taxes.
Respondent filed annual itr for 1998.
LOA three notices of presentatin of
records. Failed to comply. BIR issued
subpoena duces ticum, acknowledged
by president. 12/2001 accountant
executed waiver on defense of
prescription.
Another
waiver...
PAN issued, then formal letter of
demand. Assessment issued on 2003.
Not issued on time. Respondent
challenged issuance of assessment,
filed protest. BIR decided and required
payment
of
income
tax,
VAT.
KETCO
CIR
v.
Petron
Petron is a transferee of tax credit
certificate. Used to pay excise taxes.
1995-1998 used TCC. Jan 13,2002
assessment for deficiency tax payment,
BIR alleged that TCCs were fraudulently
procured from dept of finance. Filed a
protest
instead
of
submitting
documents. Warrant of distraint and
levy.
CTA division: ordered petron to pay
CTA
enbanc:
reversed
division
SC: CTA enbanc was correct, petron in
good
faith
in
using
TCCs.
BIR contended that it cannot be
estopped by errors committed by its
agents. Petron had no participation in
the fraudulent procurement of TCCs.
Although govt is not estopped for errors
of its agents, if it works injustice to the
taxpayer, not applicable. BIR failed to
prove that petron connived in the
procurement of fraudulent TCCs.
ans
South
corp
Section
203
Three year prescriptive period for bir
to make assessment from date of filing
or deadline, whichever comes later.
March 31, 2014 filed ITR for 2013. Was
the return filed on time? Yes. Because
deadline is april 15, 2014. When would
be the last date for BIR to make an
assessment? April 17, 2017. Same
whether individual or corporation
(adopting
calendar
year)
Discovery should have been made
within the three year period (erroneous
daw)
Case:
12,
January
16,
2015
2016
withholding
the
related
tax.
If tax payor is exempt from income tax,
lessee not required to withhold tax, as
long as therenis a certificate of
exemption.
4. Excise tax on excisable articles have
not been paid (alcohol, tobacco)
Mineral products: sand and gravel
subject to 2% excise tax. The possessor
of sand and gravel is the one who will
prove that excise tax have been paid.
Must be paid upon extraction of
mineral
products.
5. Article locally purchased or imported
by an exempt person, has been sold,
traded or transferred to non-exempt
person.
Ex: cooperative (exempt taxpayer),
imported tractor. Excise and VAT is not
collected
from
them.
But
the
cooperative must be the actual user of
the tractor. If found in the possession
of a taxable person, the excise tax and
VAt shall be assessed against the nonexempt
persons.
What are the important things that a
valid
assessment
contain?
1.
Date
of
issuance
2.
Details
of
tax
deficiency
computation
3. Statement of facts snd the law, rules
and
regulations
4. Name and signature of the BIR
officisl authorized to issue the
assessment
RD
or
CIR
5. Demand to pay the deficiency taxes
as assessed within the prescribed
period.
TP shall respond within 15 days. Then
issue FAN. Even if there is a response,
BIR shall issue FAN and FLD within 15
days from receipt of response.
FAN
and
FLD
assessment
If the assessment is protested, it will
become a disputed assessment. Then
BIR will issue FDDA. If after lapse of
180 days and BIR did not issue FDDA,
taxpayer may go to court within 30
days after lapse of 180 days.
When the protest contains a question of
fact, it pertains to doubt or truth or
falsity of the fact as alleged by the BIR
in the assessment. Or suffiecency or
insufficiency
of
evidence
where
assessment
is
based.
Question of law- doubt as to
application of law as to certain
statements
of
fact
Ex: assessment issued subjecting DST
on advances made to subsidiary
entities, contending that it is in the
nature of a loan, what type of protest:
question of law or fact? Question of
law. There is no question as to
sufficiency of evidence of the fact of
advances.
December
19,
2015
Section 203: Period of Assessment,
relate
to
Section
228:
When should the three year period
start
to
be
counted?
After the last day of filing prescribed
by law or actual filing of return if filed
after deadline, whichever is later
Even if the Taxpayer replied to the PAN,
there
shall
still
be
a
FAN
No proceeding in court... After three
year period, assessment must be made
first
Instances when BIR can file collection
without
assessment:
1. Self-assessed taxes, when the
amount to be paid was not paid or not
fully paid. (when there is no need for
reevaluatin or recomputation) - unpaid
amount can be questioned in court
without assessment, but must be filed
within
three
years.
2. Second installment payment for
income tax of individual taxpayer not
paid on or before July 15, BIR can file a
collection case for the balance
Self assessing system is different from a
mathematical error. There must first be
a recomputation. Defficiency not
apparent on the face of the return.
If error is not apparent, not exception
to
PAN
Exception to 203: section 222
1. False or fraudulent return with
intent to evade tax or failure to file a
return
Difference between false or fraudulent
and
failure
to
file
BIR can file collection case even
without assessment, 10 years after
discovery of falsity, fraud or omission
Fraud
assessment
vs
ordinary
assessment
1. FA, imposition of penalty is 50%, in
OA,
only
25%
(Section
228b)
Presumption of fraud: substantial
underdeclaration
taxable
sales,
receipts or income (more than 30% of
that declared) and a claim of
deductions in an amount exceeding 30%
of
actual
deductions
Taxable
sales
Take note what denominator to use
(gross sales, gross income, argue)
Section 222(b): a case of extension,
execution of waiver for extension of
time within which the BIR and taxpayer
agree to extend the period when BIR
may
assess
(
under
normal
circumstances).
No
extension/agreement
for
false,
fraudulent
or
failure
Another extension may be agreed upon
before the expiration of agreed
extension; may be agreed a number of
times
Section 222(c): period to file collection
case
5
years
Administratively- warrant of distraint
or
levy
Judicially - filing a collection case
If BIR decided to issue assessment in
case of fraud, but later on decided to
file a collection case in court after 5
years,
decide.
Not allowed because under letter c is in
defense
only
of
the
taxpayer.
Section 222(d): 5 years from issuance of
assessment; agreement of extension to
collect must be made within the
expiration of the first five year period
to
collect
Section 223: Suspension of Running of
Statute
of
Limitations
1. When CIR is prohibited to make
assesement - ex is when an executive
order is issued prohibiting him
2. Request for reinvestigation that is
granted. If not granted, or there was
inaction, running is not tolled 3. Taxpayer cannot be located in the
address given by him in the return,
except when the BIR is informed of the
change
of
address
4. When warrant of distraint or levy is
duly served to taxpayer but no
properties
could
be
located
5. When taxpayer is out of the
Philippines
6. Payment of estate tax (sec91b) reason for extension is that there is
undue hardship on the part of the
estate to pay the tax , may be
extended
up
to
5
years
Differentiate
from
extension
Section 92: direction for commissioner
to make assessment within three years.
Mustbe, if possible, within 1 year from
application or filing of return,
whichever
is
later
FAN - three years - collection
Requirement of valid waiver: in writing;
determinate period to make the
assessment
(pascor
case)
In case there is an assessment issued,
and protest was filed, disputed
assessment. If decided, taxpayer may
go to court within 30 days from receipt
of decision. In case of inaction, go to
court or wait for the decision
Allied
Banking
v.
CIR
Can a final letter of demand be
construed to be the final decision on
disputed
assessment?
RR 18-2013, FDDA. Only when FDDa is
issued can the CTA take cognizance of a
case
on
disputed
assessment
GR: taxpayer may or may not respond
to the PAN. Even if he responds, FAN
may be issued, without making any
discussion
on
the
reply.
Whether or not a final demand letter
separate
corporate
entity
In constructive distraint of property, no
actual
taking
To safeguard the interest of the govt,
the
comm
may
place
under
constructive distraint the property of
delinquent taxpayer or any taxpayer
who ij the opinion of the comm is:
retiring from the business, intending to
leave the phils, remove his property
therefrom, or hide or conceal property,
or any act tending to obstruct the
proceeedings for collecting the tax due
or which may be due from him (206)
If the taxpayer retires with huge
amount
of
assessment
pending,
constructive
distraint
Leaves the country at least twice
unless justified to be business or job
related
Transfers of huge amount to other
countries
Use of aliases in bank accounts
When taxpayer has underdeclared more
than
30%
of
his
income
When there is information that
Taxpayer
tries
to
evade
Alfredo Azarcon v. SB GR 116033
A private person signed the receipt of a
certain dump truck belonging to
another taxpayer. Owner surreptitiously
withdrew the dump truck. BIR filed
criminal case of malversation against
Azarcon.
Issue: can mr hizon be considered
agent
of
BIR?
Can he be obligated to preserve the
property
intact
and
...
Held:
The SB has no jurisdiction because the
accused in signing the warrant is not to
be considered as a public officer or
employee because his appointment as
custodian is not equivalent to being
appointed as employee of BIR. Agent
only for the purpose of preserving the
property
under
distraint.
Section 207: Summary Remedies
A. RDO may implement if tax assessed
is
1m
or
less
If more, the CIr or authorized
representative
B.
Levy
on
Real
Property
Request for certificate of landholdings
from
the
assessor's
office
In levy, what is important is the
annotation
in
the
certificate
Case: inaction of BIR with the protest.
If warrant of distraint or levy sent to
taxpayer, can be considered as denial
of
the
protest.
Sec. 208: Procedure for Distraint and
Garnishment
Sec. 209 - 212: Sale of property
memorize!!!
Additional requirements for this reason
1. Waiver of secrecy of bank deposits
Percentages: 40/10 of basic tax due
NEB compsed of commissioner and four
deputy commissioners, always with the
concurrence of the commissioner.
Abatement unilaterla act. Tax must be
excessive, arbirptrary or unjust, or
collection does not justify the cost of
collection.
RA 10021: where commissioner can
inquire in to the bank acount. If there
is request for information from foreign
tax
authority.
Section
3
Power
to
refund
Difference of refund and credit
In case the refund is granted, cash.
Section 294(c) credit or refund taxes
If chosen was carryover, not considered
as
written
claim
for
refund.
If credit or refund was chosen,
considered as written claim for credit
or
refund.
When the taxpayer writes the
commissioner to claim fprefund or
credit. Particular form to be filled-up
other
than
the
return
itself.
One of the requirements for claiming
return or refund, there must be actual
oayment of the tax. Prescriptive period
is
2
years
after
payment.
Any request for conversion into refund
of unutilized tax credit may be allowed
subject
to
sec112
Four instances wherein a claim for
credit/refund may be availed 229
1. Erroneous oayment or receipt
Illegal
payment
or
receipt
Unauhtorized imposition of payemtn
Destructioon of internal revenue
stamps
Section 112A Zero Rated or Effectively
Zero-rated
Sales
Compare zero-rated and exempt
Sales duly accounted for by the BSP
PEZA. Sales considered export sales.
What is the difference between 112
and
204?
Prescriptive period, no actual payment.
Sec 112a not applicable to 204
Section
58D
Creditable withholding tax (when
taxpayer may claim for refund without
actual
payment)
Six circumstances when tax refund may
be
made:
Erroneous
Illegal
Unauthirized
Doc
stamps
Sec112a
Sec58d
Section
204:
Written application for claim for refund
Why is it that there is a need to file for
written claim when the law says that if
overpayment appears in the return, it
is already considered a written claim?
Section 229 so that the taxpayer may
still resort to judicial remedies if his
claim is not acted upon by the
commissioner
If the taxpayer fails to elevate the case
to the cta within 2 years, just hope
that the commissioner will grant the
claim for refund. Commissioner may
still refund the excess payment even
beyond the 2 year period, based on the
return
showing
overpayment.
Aichi
Case
Claim for refund of input vat
Section
294c
and
sec229
are
inapplicable
to
tsec112a
CTA
ordered
CIR
to
refund.
Administrative claim must precede the
judicial
filing
There is no prohibition, but see above.
As a lawyer, take note of the date of
filing
Sections 204 and 229 are not applicable
in case sec112 since claim fir refund is
based
on
input
tax.
Claim for refund should be filed in the
CIR,
under
sec112c
If the commissioner decides within 120
days,
taxpayer
may
elevate.
SC: premature filing of judicial claim.
After the decision of Sc, can the
taxpayer still act on the claim for
refund?
Yes, because the CTA did not acquire
jurisdiction.
Was the 120-day period suspended by
the filing of the case with the CTA? Can
aichi still file another judicial claim,
and resort to judicial remedy?
No definite answer yet. May answer
based on construction of refunds
against
the
taxpayer.
May also answer that the judicial claim
tolled the 120 days. So after decisin of
SC, count 120 days, may still file
another judicial remedy within 30 days
from
decision.
Mam's opinion: refund can no longer be
elevated to the court. Since 120+30 day
requirement
is
jurisdictional.
Is
120-day
orescriptive
period
jurisdictional?
Yes. Under case of San Roque
San
Roque
case
If filed beyond the 2-year period
(admin), considered filed out of time.
But if it is filed within the 2-years, BIR
Yamane
v.
Lepanto
City treasurer, business tax assessment.
Protest denied by treasurer. Refers to
taxes under the LGC. Leoanto appealed
before the RTC, decided in favor of
treasurer. Petitn for review under rule
42 (governs review of rtc in the
exercise of its appellate j). CA reversed
RTC. Collection from condo owners not
subject
to
business
tax.
Issue: mode of appeal adopted is
erroneous. RTc did not exercise
appeallte j. Must be rule 41
Held: RTc exercised original j. However,
this was before the effectivity iof 9282.
Now, CTa has appellate j over cases
originally recognized by the RTC
Continue
reading
the
case
SC sustained the CA. In favor of
Lepanto. Assessment dues from condo
owners for safety and maintenance are
not
subject
to
business
tax.
RA
9282:
What are the two instances when CTA
en banc must decide? Remember!!!
1. CBAA decision on the exercise of its
appellate
jurisdiction
involving
assessment and taxation of real
property
originally
decided
by
provincial or city treasurer ( real
property as assessed by the assessor of
the city or municipality having j over
the
real
properties).
If the taxpayer disagrees, pay under
protest. LBAA- Provincial BAA/City BAA
(EOJ
--->
central
BAA
----->
If property is located in a composite
city
or
municipality,
PBAA
If
independent
city,
CBAA
(?)
Then to Central BAA - appellate
jurisdiction
Decision of CBAA in the exercise of its
appellate j is brought before the CTA
en banc. Can their decision be subject
to
motion
for
reconsideration?
2. Decisions, ruling or orders of the RTc
in the exercise of their appellate
jurisdiction. Example, collection case
amounting to 300k, falls under
jurisdiction of mtc. Can be appealed to
the
RTC.
If ruling of RTc in the exercise of its
original jurisdiction, appeal to CTA
division
Remember what decisions may be
subject to motion for reconsideration.
How should the appeal be made or on
what mode of appeal should be
brought?
Rule 42 of the rules of civil procedure:
petitin for review with the .cta in
division. Within 30 days. If petition
brought under rule 42, use 30 days as
provided
in
9282.
1. Of the CIR, COC, RTC of its original,
DTI,
DA,
Finance
Take note that 9282 refers to rule 42 as
to procedure, and not to period.
Be careful on using periods of appeal
(15/30
days
Usually, original to appeallte, 30 days.
From appellate to other motions, 15
days.
For
ordinary
After the decisions rendered by the CTa
en
banc,
what
to
do?
File motion for recon or directly file
with the SC a verified petition
formreview on certiorari under rule 45.
Period to appeal under this rule is 15
days from receipt of notice of
judgment, unless...read rule 45.
Is it mandatory to file a motion a recon
or
new
trial?
No. It is the option of the taxpayer
whether
to
do
so.
Motion for recon on nt but later on
filed a petition for teview with sc,
motion for recon/nt is deemed
abandoned (revised rules of the Cta)
AO
No.
05-11-07
Rule
2.1
Rule
4.2
Why exclusive (in the two cases) AJ of
the
CTA?
Because CTA en banc must decide the
case to the exclusion of all other courts
All the rest of the cases, the original j
must lie either with the RTC or
Read
revised
rules
Amount of tax is necessary to
determine
jurisdiction
of
CTA.
However, assessment is not necessary
to file a criminal case. Reconcile.
If assessment had been issued to the
taxpayer, cannot be increased. If not,
may be increased upon disposition of
criminal case. Bir can file a criminal
case without assessment. But should
determine the amount of tax to
determine the jurisdiction. 1 million
and
more,
CTA
division.
Failure to obey summons, penalty is 2
years imprisonment or fine of 10000.
Mtc
No specified amount - depends upon
the penalty attached to the criminal
violation
Example:
1. FAN 2005 basic amount 350k. 150k.
Total of 500k issued by RD of CDO.
What
to
do
first?
File protest with the RD on or before
feb 4, 2015 because assessment
received on jan 5, 2015. If denied,
motion for recon before the cir or
appeal directly to the cta division.
MR/MNT then en banc. Filed within
within 15 days from mr/mnt to cta en
banc
Protest:
30-30-15
Santos
v.
People
Denial of interloc generally not
appealable and cannot be questioned
by certioari except GADLEJ and inter is
patently erroneous and remedy of
appeal sould not remedy...public
policy... Rule 65 may be availed.
Tax evasion case. Filed with the CTA in
Division. Questined jurisdiction of CTA.
Motion to quash the information. CTA
div denied. Motion for recon denied.
Santos filed motin for extension for
filing
petition
for
review.
CTA en banc denied petition for review.
Has no jurisdiction over interlocutory
orders.
SC: affirmed cta en banc in not
entertaining
mr
for
questioning
decisions
on
interlocutory.
There was no proof of existence of
GADLEJ
in
this
case.
February
13,
2016
Motion for reconsideration is not
mandatory
Case: faustino. GR 141524, 9/2005.
With CTA division before going to CTA
en banc, not mandatory within 15 days.
Then fresh oeriod of 15 days after
decisin on MR to file appeal to CTA en
banc.
Is aggrieved party allowed to go
directly to CTA en banc? Permissive.
Two options either to file directly an
appeal with CTA en banc or file an MR.
If no mr is filed but appeal, done within
15
days.
COC v. Marina Sales GR 183868
11/20/2010
Based on rule 8, 1, petition for review
or
reconsideration
must
be.....mandatory. The word must
clearly indicate the mandatory nature
of filing o MR. Resolution versus
decision.
Basta, mr is mandatory for decisns and
resolutions.
Section 11 aggrieved parrty may file a
MR and no mention as to appeal to the
en
banc.
CTa div to CTA en banc, MR is
mandatory. En banc to SC, not
mandatory because within 15 days from
receipt
of
decision.
203,
228,
222
MTC.
Use
basic
tax.
What if motion is based on BIR RD
should have executed first the WDL
issued to him before filing collection
case?
Deny. BIR can simultaneously exercise
admin and judicial remedies to collect.
Section
205
2. BDO loan 5million, commerical land.
PN annotated before release. ROD
required x to pay doc stamps on pn on
the annotation. Jan 15, 2014 payment.
When loan wa sreleased, 25k was
deducted from amount of loan. Bank
paid same amount to bir. X filed a claim
for refudn due to double payment.
After a year, x did not recieve any reply
for the claim. Petition for review with
MTc of CDO since only 25k. Bir peititon
for lack of jurisdiction. Resolve.
Jurisdiction for refund exclusively lies
with the court of Tax appeals. Grant
motion because mtc cdo has no
jurisdiction.
XYZ corp filed quarter it may 25, 2011,
aug 25, 2011, nov 25, 2011. April 10,
2012, filed final income tax return,
income tax payment of 100k was
reflected. Box indicating amount to be
refunded marked x. April 11, 2014, xyz
filed written clsim for refund with bir
comm. April 14, 2014, petition for
revieww
with
cta.
Bir
mTD
prescription. Xyz said run only starting
april
11,
2014.
Decide.
Section
204
and
229.
Claim for refund 2 years from filing and
payment,
to
commissioner.
GR sec229, within 2 years claim for
refund must be filed with cir.
In case of corporations, GR 117254,
corps to file quarterly with estimated
amounts of tax payments. Reckoning
period of filing starts to run from the
time the corp has determined its tax
liability. Determinatjon of final income
tax liability. Final income tax return.
Because corp filed on april 10, 2012
and filed claim for erefund on april11,
2014. Late for one day. Petition for
review,
late
for
4
days.
Should the commissiner grant the claim
for
refund?
Yes. Even if already prescribed, can