TORTS AND DAMAGES

SECTIONS 3A, 3C, 3D & 3E

(1st Semester SY 2015-2016)
ASSIGNMENT
(1) Please submit 1 x 1 photographs to your beadle so that the class seating
plan may be arranged alphabetically
(2) Read Comments and Cases on the following topics A. CONCEPT OF TORT
Article 2176, CC
i. Barredo vs. Garcia, 73 Phil 607
ii. Elcano vs. Hill, 77 SCRA 98
iii. Cinco vs. Canonoy, 90 SCRA 369
iv. Baksh vs. CA, 219 SCRA 115
v. Dulay vs. CA, 243 SCRA 220 (1995)
vi. Garcia vs. Florido, 52 SCRA 420
vii. Andamo vs. IAC, 191 SCRA 195
viii. Taylor vs. Manila Electric Company, 16 Phil 8
ix. Loadmaster v. Glodel (GR No. 179446, January 10, 2011)
B. TORT DISTINGUISHED FROM CIVIL LIABILITY ARISING FROM CRIME
Article 2177, CC
Article 365, RPC
i. Barredo vs. Garcia, 73 Phil 607
ii. Padilla vs. CA, 129 SCRA 558
iii. Cruz vs. CA, 282 SCRA
iv. Philippine Rabbit vs. People, GR No. 147703 (2004)
v. People vs. Ligon, 152 SCRA 419 (1987)
Rule 111, Rules of Court

vi. Heirs of Simon v. Chan (GR No. 157547, February 23, 2011)
C. TORT DISTINGUISHED FROM BREACH OF CONTRACT
Articles 1170-1174, CC
Article 1174, CC
Article 2178, CC
i. Cangco vs. Manila Railroad, 38 Phil 768
ii. Fores vs. Miranda, 105 Phil 266
iii. Far East vs. CA, 241 SCRA 671
iv. Air France vs. Carrascoso, 18 SCRA 155
v. PSBA vs. CA, 205 SCRA 729
vi. Syquia vs. CA, 217 SCRA 624
vii. Calalas vs. Sunga, 332 SCRA 356 (2000)
viii. PNB v. FF Cruz (GR No. 173259, July 25, 2011)
D. Principles
Art. 19, CC
Article 20, CC
Art. 21, NCC
Ocean Builder v. Spouses Cubacub (GR No. 150898, April 13, 2011)