Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Preparer:
08/31/16
Page:
1 of 8
Supersedes:
05/15
Approver:
SVP & General Manager,
Freeport
REVISION HISTORY
Revision
Date
07/16
Revision
Number
5
05/15
Revision Details
- Added Sect. 2.4, PSSRs upon restoration of temporary MOC to
original configuration.
- Sect. 5.1 modified to require Construction Engineer/Manager for
all capital projects
- Sect. 5.1 specified 3 individuals required for PSM/RMP PSSRs
MOC 0117-EHS-16-1140.
-Att. 8.1 & 8.4 Modified PSSR checklists per incident 0117-UTIL15-0074
-5.1 Clarified minimum number of people
-3.1.3 Added exception for personnel protection insulation
-Att. 9 Clarified title
Title:
Pre-Startup Project Safety Review
Freeport Site
Procedure
Preparer:
1.0
05/15
PURPOSE
This document defines the procedures for preparation and execution of Pre-Startup Safety Reviews
(PSSR).
The purpose of a Pre-Startup Safety Review (also called Step 4 in capital projects) is to:
2.0
1.1
Ensure that all safety and environmental issues identified during the previous EHS
reviews (i.e., Step 0, 1, 2, 3, Process Hazard Analyses (PHA), or Management of Change
(MOC)) have been satisfactorily resolved and that the process is safe to start.
1.2
Ensure the design concepts identified in the EHS reviews have been implemented.
1.3
1.4
1.5
For changes involving the introduction of a highly hazardous chemical, ensure that the
above items have been completed prior to the introduction of highly hazardous
chemicals.
SCOPE
2.1
PSSRs shall be conducted for new facilities and for modified facilities when the
modification is significant enough to require a change in the process safety information.
2.2
PSSRs shall also be conducted for all capital projects unless they have been exempted
from the step review process per BC032.013.
2.3
For MOCs that do not meet the scope of Section 2.1 or 2.2, the MOC Coordinator should
determine whether or not a PSSR is needed.
2.4
When restoring a temporary change back to the original configuration, conduct another
PSSR if a PSSR was needed for the change to the temporary condition.
3.0 DEFINITIONS
3.1
Mechanical Completion
Title:
Pre-Startup Project Safety Review
Freeport Site
Procedure
Preparer:
05/15
Mechanical completion occurs when all equipment has been installed, all instruments are
installed, all wires and air lines are connected, all electrical wires are hooked up, covers
installed, conduits sealed, pre-commissioning and commissioning completed and each
system approved by the owner. Specifically this includes:
3.1.1
Rotating Equipment
The correct direction of rotation has been established with the coupling or other
drive disconnected. The necessary piping has been connected and properly
aligned. All couplings, sheaves, sprockets, etc., have been properly aligned to
within manufacturer's tolerances. Couplings, belts, chains, and guards have
been installed.
3.1.2
Pressure Vessels
Hydrostatic tests have been performed in the manufacturer's shop. Flange leak
testing has been completed as part of the pipe testing.
3.1.3
Piping
The total system has been checked with regard to conformity to the drawings
and checked that the correct interconnection between the units has been made.
The system has been successfully pressure tested. The insulation for personnel
protection has been installed except for flanges left bare for testing or locations
where it prevents an effective PSSR. Flange guards as required by the Pipe
Service Index should be in place.
3.1.4
Safety Features
Safety features are fully functional. These include, but are not limited to safety
interlocks, sprinkler systems, fall arrest systems, etc.
3.1.5
Environmental
The installations for environmental protection are complete and environmental
permits/closures are complete.
3.1.6
Electrical
The installation has been checked regarding correct connections for wiring and
function.
Title:
Pre-Startup Project Safety Review
Freeport Site
Procedure
Preparer:
05/15
3.1.7
Instrumentation
All installations have been checked regarding correct connections for wiring,
tubing, and function. This includes checking the opening and closing of control
valves. Alarms have been connected and calibrated. Instrument tubing has
been leak-tested including the instrument, and bubble leak-tested.
3.1.8
Site Development/Housekeeping
The site being inspected has been cleaned and all construction debris removed.
All rubbish has been hauled off and the grounds graded and ditches finished.
3.1.9
4.
PROCEDURES
4.1
4.2
It should be noted that the project should be periodically reviewed throughout the
construction phase to ensure correct installations are made as one identifies
safety concerns not previously recognized. This is the responsibility of everyone
with assigned responsibilities in the project area, including the safety hub and the
technology team.
4.1.2
Some projects that are large in scope and size, or have multiple phases, may
require a series of Pre-Startup Project Safety Reviews. Also, projects being
implemented during shutdowns may have small items that are not complete but
do not affect the safety or operation of the unit. Decisions on how to handle
these situations must be made on a case by case basis with a Pre-Startup team
and have responsibilities and dates assigned to complete the items.
Title:
Pre-Startup Project Safety Review
Freeport Site
Procedure
Preparer:
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.3
05/15
MOCs if any changes were been made after the conclusion of the step review
processes and not reviewed by the step review team
Non-capital projects must have the following preparatory documentation
submitted to the PSSR team prior to the scheduled PSSR:
MOC
Checklist to be used to execute the PSSR if required by Section 6.3
If the required preparatory documents are contained within an MOC, the
requirement for submission of the preparatory documents can be met by
ensuring the PSSR team members are aware of the location of the MOC.
5.
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.5
ATTENDEES
5.1
Required Attendees
Production/Manufacturing Representative
Change Requestor or designee
Maintenance Representative for PSM/RMP covered scope
DOT Member for PSM/RMP covered scope
Project Engineer / Manager for capital projects
Construction Engineer/Manager for capital projects
EHS Hub for capital projects <=$5M, EHS CoEs for capital projects >$5M
Production Execution Manager for capital projects >$5M
Title:
Pre-Startup Project Safety Review
Freeport Site
Procedure
Preparer:
05/15
Optional Attendees
The Project Engineer or MOC Coordinator should invite the appropriate personnel from
the list of Optional Attendees above based on the scope of the change, even if personnel
are not required to attend.
6.
AGENDA ITEMS
6.1
For capital projects, the Project Engineer is the chairperson and should give a brief
review of the project scope, an overview of the safety concepts resulting from the Step 1
and 2 (Step 3 if applicable) safety reviews and how these concepts have been
incorporated into the project design, construction and equipment. Special emphasis
should be placed on items in the SR5/Step Review Meeting Minutes and Safety and
Loss Prevention Form F-3749.
6.2
For non-capital projects, the MOC Coordinator or delegate is the chairperson and should
give a brief review of the project scope, an overview of the safety concepts resulting from
the safety reviews and how these concepts have been incorporated into the project
design, construction and equipment. Special emphasis should be placed on items on
the MOC Tab 3 Risk.
6.3
For new facilities or complex modifications to an existing facility, a PSSR Checklist (Long
Form) shall be used. The complexity of a modification is determined by the project
engineer for capital projects or the MOC Coordinator for non-capital projects. It is best
practice to make this determination early such as during the ORBE review (typically
projects with ORBE 6 or 10 ratings are considered complex), the Step 2 review, or
Title:
Pre-Startup Project Safety Review
Freeport Site
Procedure
Preparer:
6.4
7.
05/15
during the MOC risk evaluation. Examples of PSSR Checklists (Long Forms) are in
Section 8.
For new or relocated portable buildings, containers, and tents, BCF020.036 Attachment
D Portable Building, Container, and Test checklist shall be used.
6.5
An item by item review of the MOC Checklist (Tab 4) shall be made by the review team.
6.6
The entire review team conducts a walkthrough of the project construction site to look for
equipment and construction is in accordance with design specifications, head knockers,
sharp edges and pinch points, shotgun valves, trip hazards, conduit covers in place,
insulation bands cut and tucked, shaft guards in place, housekeeping, labeling, warning
signs, etc.
6.7
Upon completion of the walkthrough, all of the review team reassembles to make sure all
deficiencies identified are incorporated into a punch list. In addition, identify any items
listed that must be completed prior to startup.
DOCUMENTATION
7.1 The project engineer for capital projects and the MOC Coordinator for non-capital projects
shall document the PSSR punch list, the PSSR Checklist (Long Form) if used, the PSSR
date, and the PSSR participants in the MOC.
7.2 Punch list items designated as after startup may be completed after the change is made,
but should be completed within two months unless there are extenuating circumstances.
It is the responsibility of the Project Manager and Manufacturing Representative to
complete the punch list in a timely manner.
8.
Title:
Pre-Startup Project Safety Review
Freeport Site
Procedure
Preparer:
05/15
10.
11.
RELATED DOCUMENTS
OSHA PSM 1910.119(i)
EPA RMP 68.77
BASF PSM/RMP Guide, Pre-Startup Safety Review Section
BC032.013 Ecology & Safety Project Reviews
BCF020.036 Management of Change
BASF Process Safety Minimum Requirements
RCMS Document BWP-001 Management of Change