Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Eduardo Rognoni,
Plaintiff,
v.
Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.;
and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
:
: Civil Action No.: ______
:
:
:
:
: COMPLAINT
: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
:
:
:
Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq. (FDCPA), and the
invasions of Plaintiffs personal privacy by the Defendants and its agents in their
illegal efforts to collect a consumer debt.
2.
3.
that the Defendants transact business in this District and a substantial portion of the
acts giving rise to this action occurred in this District.
PARTIES
4.
FCO and whose identities are currently unknown to the Plaintiff. One or more of
the Collectors may be joined as parties once their identities are disclosed through
discovery.
7.
FCO at all times acted by and through one or more of the Collectors.
ALLEGATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL COUNTS
A. The Debt
8.
9.
The Debt arose from services provided by the Creditor which were
primarily for family, personal or household purposes and which meets the
definition of a debt under 15 U.S.C. 1692a(5).
10.
the Debt.
13.
Plaintiff informed FCO that he did not incur the Debt, that the Debt was incurred
as a result of identity theft, and that he had no intention of paying the Debt.
14.
16.
FCO used abusive and hostile language when speaking with Plaintiff
agencies if Plaintiff did not immediately pay the Debt, despite being informed that
the Debt was incurred as a result of identity theft. On at least one occasion, FCOs
agent claimed that he would ruin Plaintiffs credit if he failed to pay the Debt
immediately. This caused a great deal of anxiety and stress to Plaintiff.
18.
Plaintiff did not immediately pay the Debt. To date, no such lawsuit has been
filed.
C. Plaintiff Suffered Actual Damages
19.
conduct, the Plaintiff suffered and continues to suffer from humiliation, anger,
anxiety, emotional distress, fear, frustration and embarrassment.
COUNT I
VIOLATIONS OF THE FDCPA 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq.
21.
Defendants misrepresented the legal status of the Debt, including insisting that
Plaintiff was legally obligated to pay a debt that he did not incur.
24.
numerous and multiple violations of the FDCPA, including every one of the abovecited provisions.
5
28.
violations.
COUNT II
VIOLATION OF THE GEORGIA FAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES ACT,
O.C.G.A. 10-1-390, et seq.
29.
1-392(6).
31.
unfair or deceptive act under O.C.G.A. 10-1-393(a) and, as such, the Plaintiff is
entitled to damages plus reasonable attorneys fees.
COUNT III
INVASION OF PRIVACY BY INTRUSION UPON SECLUSION
35.
41.
All acts of Defendant and its agents were committed with malice,