Alpha Creations v. Daniel K - Complaint

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 1 of 15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
ALPHA CREATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff,
V.
DANIEL K FINE JEWELRY
USA, LLC.
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-cv-02390

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, Alpha Creations, Inc., (Alpha Creations) for its complaint against Defendant,
Daniel K Fine Jewelry USA, LLC (Daniel K), avers that:
SECTION I. PARTIES
1.
Plaintiff, Alpha Creations is a corporation organized and existing under the laws
of the State of Texas, with its principal place of business at One Arena Place, 7322 Southwest
Freeway, Suite 1810., Houston, Harris County, TX 77074.
2.
On information and belief, Defendant, Daniel K is a corporation organized under
the laws of the State of New York, and may be served at its principal place of business at 589 5th
Avenue, New York, New York 10017.
SECTION II. JURISDICTION
3.
The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit pursuant to the
provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338, 2201, 2202, and under 15 U.S.C. 15 because the action
concerns potential acts of patent infringement, patent validity, and unfair competition.
1
4.
The federal courts have exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over all cases arising
under the patent laws. 28 U.S.C. 1338(a). An action for patent infringement or one for a
declaratory judgment that a patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed arises under the
patent laws. C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Schwartz, 716 F.2d 874 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
5.
Alpha Creations brings this claim for a declaratory judgment under both Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 57 and 28 U.S.C. 2201, 2202 seeking a declaratory judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of United States Patent Nos. 7,269,973 and United States Patent
D513,712 (collectively, the patents in suit), both purportedly owned by Daniel K.
6.
Declaratory relief is necessary because Plaintiff has a reasonable apprehension of
being sued for patent infringement by Defendant. Plaintiffs apprehension is reasonable and
realistic in view of Defendants threats as to Plaintiffs acts in the United States.
Such
apprehension has a chilling effect on competition in this country and is likely to cause harm by
interfering with Plaintiffs business opportunities.
7.
Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and 1400(b)
because it is in this district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the
claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated.
SECTION III. FACTS
8.
Alpha Creations has manufactured and sold to customers in the United States a
3/4 U-prong eternity ring in 18K white gold, 18K yellow gold, 18K rose gold and platinum, and a
1/2 U-prong eternity ring in 18K white gold, 18K yellow gold, 18K rose gold and platinum
(collectively the accused rings), from 2009 until recently, on its online diamond and jewelry
Internet retailing website www.briangavindiamonds.com.
9.
On or about July 26, 2016, Alpha Creations received a cease and desist letter from
the law firm of Ezra Sutton, P.A., on behalf of Daniel K, a true and correct copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Copies of the patents in suit are attached to the letter (Exhibits 1-A
and 1-B), and screenshots of the accused rings apparently taken from the Alpha Creations
website, www.briangavindiamonds.com, were also attached (Exhibit 1-C).
10.
In this letter, Daniel K demanded that Alpha Creations (1) cease all sales of its
infringing U Eternity Wedding bands and settings, (2) provide an accounting of all sales made
by Alpha Creations of infringing products sold, (3) immediately turn over all molds, silicone
molds, models, waxes and CAD files, (4) immediately turn over all open orders and (5) agree to
identify retailers or other customers using Alpha Creations website to obtain casting or custom
orders; threatened that if Alpha Creations did not comply, we have been authorized to
commence a lawsuit for infringement and unfair competition in federal court for an accounting
of profits, damages, an injunction, and attorneys fees; and noted unless an immediate reply by
email was sent, we will begin to prepare and file in the Federal Court the Summons and
Complaint as authorized by Daniel K Fine Jewelry USA. See Exhibit 1.
11.
On information and belief, Daniel K asserted the same patents against four other
parties and on May 27, 2016 filed complaints in the Southern District of New York for patent
infringement against: Forevermark US Inc. (Case No. 1:16-cv-04004-AJN), Exhibit 2 attached
hereto; Blue Nile Inc. (Case No. 1:16-cv-04001-LGS), Exhibit 3 attached hereto; JR Castings &
Findings Inc. (Case No. 1:16-cv-04002-PGG), Exhibit 4 attached hereto; and Unique Settings of
New York Inc. (Case No. 1:16-cv-04004-JPO), Exhibit 5 attached hereto; asserting both the 712
and 973 patents.
12.
On information and belief, Daniel K has sent similar cease and desist letters to
other jewelers in the United States who have ceased selling eternity band rings with U-shaped
seats.
13.
A justiciable case or controversy therefore exits between Alpha Creations and
Daniel K concerning, inter alia, Alpha Creations alleged infringement of the 712 and 973
patents, imminent fear of suit and the validity of the 712 and 973 patents.
14.
On February 20, 2004, Daniel Koren, the applicant on both of the patents in suit,
executed and filed a trademark application on behalf of Daniel K, Inc. for the trademark
UTERNITY, United States Serial No. 78/371,065 (the UTERNITY application), submitting the
following full page advertisement from the February 2004 issue of Couture International Jeweler
and/or point of sale display, as a specimen then in use:
February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad/Point of Sale Display
A true and correct copy of the 065 UTERNITY registration file history is attached hereto as Exhibit
6, and includes a copy of the UTERNITY trademark application, with the specimens of use
(hereinafter February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad) at pp. 29-30 and 33-36.
4
15.
On information and belief, Daniel Koren made and/or made arrangements to
make the UTERNITY ring shown in the February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad; took
and/or made arrangements to take photographs of the UTERNITY ring shown in the February 2004
Couture International Jeweler Ad; and personally arranged for the placement of the February 2004
Couture International Jeweler Ad, all prior to February 20, 2004.
16.
In the UTERNITY trademark application signed and filed on February 20, 2004,
Daniel Koren, after being warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable
by fine or imprisonment or both under 18 U.S.C. 1001, alleged dates of use for the UTERNITY mark
anywhere at least as early as October 1, 2003, and use in interstate commerce at least as early as
December 2, 2003. Daniel Koren also stated the specimens submitted showed the mark as then
used in commerce and consisted of advertising and point of purchase displays. See Exhibit 6, pp.
26-27.
17.
On or about March 2, 2005, the United States Patent and Trademark Office sent
a Notice of Publication under 12(a); published the UTERNITY mark for opposition in the Official
Gazette on or about March 22, 2005; and issued Reg. No. 2,962,475 on June 14, 2005, which again
recited the 2003 dates of use and the February 20, 2004 filing date. See Exhibit 6, pp. 20-21.
18.
Contemporaneously with the publication and registration of the UTERNITY
trademark based on the February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad as a specimen, and more
than one year after filing the UTERNITY trademark application, on April 29, 2005, Daniel Koren
filed U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 11/118,819, entitled Eternity Band with U-Shaped Seats for
Gemstones, which eventually issued as the 973 patent; and then on May 4, 2005, U.S. Patent
Application Ser. No. 29/229,174, also entitled Eternity Band with U-Shaped Seats for
Gemstones, which eventually issued as the 712 patent. True and correct copies of the file
histories of the applications issued as the 973 and 712 patents, downloaded from the United
States Patent and Trademark Office are attached hereto as Exhibits 7 and 8, respectively.
19.
The ring published in the 2004 Couture International Jeweler February Ad was
virtually identical to the rings illustrated and claimed in the 973 and 712 patents, and but for the
examiners inability to consider the 2004 Couture International Jeweler February Ad the 973 and
712 patents would never have been granted.
5
20.
In the 973 patent application, Daniel Koren signed a Declaration for Utility or
Design Patent Application acknowledging the duty to disclose information which is material to
patentability as defined in 37 CFR 1.56; and declaring that all statements made of his own
knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements
and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment or both under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and
that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent
issued thereon. See Exhibit 7 at pp. 63-64.
21.
Daniel Koren and/or Ezra Sutton withheld the February 2004 Couture
International Jeweler Ad from disclosure to the patent examiner, and never cited it in the 973
patent application. See Exhibit 1-B and Exhibit 7.
22.
In the 712 patent application, Daniel Koren also signed a Declaration for Utility
or Design Patent Application acknowledging the duty to disclose information which is material to
patentability as defined in 37 CFR 1.56; and declaring that all statements made of his own
knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false statements
and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment or both under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and
that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patent
issued thereon. See Exhibit 8 at pp. 27-28.
23.
In the 712 patent application, on May 12, 2005, Daniel Korens attorney, Ezra
Sutton, filed a Petition to Make Special so that the application would be advanced out of order
for earlier examination. The Petition to Make Special represented that a pre-examination search
was made of the records of the U.S. Patent Office by Ezra Sutton, and cited only three U.S.
Patents, concluding that the features set forth in the Claim patentably distinguish over the prior
art, and making no mention or other disclosure of the February 2004 Couture International
Jeweler Ad. See Exhibit 8 at pp. 14-17.
24.
Daniel Koren withheld the February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad from
disclosure to the patent examiner, and never cited it in the 712 patent application. See Exhibit
1-A and Exhibit 8.
6
25.
On information and belief, Daniel Koren and/or Ezra Sutton were well aware of
the February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad, were well aware of the duty of disclosure,
and deliberately withheld the February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad from the
examiners in both of the 973 and 712 patent applications.
26.
On information and belief, Daniel Koren executed a power of attorney appointing
Ezra Sutton and Ezra Sutton, P.A. to prosecute the UTERNITY registration and file a Declaration
Under Sections 8 and 15, which was filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on or
about June 9, 2011. A copy of the submission by Ezra Sutton appears at pp. 13-19 of Exhibit 6.
27.
On or about June 15, 2015, Ezra Sutton, P.A., filed an Application for Renewal of
the UTERNITY registration. See Exhibit 6 at pp. 6-11.

28.
On information and belief, Daniel K and/or Ezra Sutton, the author of Daniel Ks
cease and desist letter of Exhibit 1, were aware that the February 2004 Couture International
Jeweler Ad had been withheld from the examiners in both of the 973 and 712 patent
applications, and that the 973 and 712 patents were invalid and unenforceable as a result.
29.
Daniel K has alleged, inferentially, that it is the owner of the entire rights, title
and interest in and to the patents in suit and that it has right to assert these patents against Alpha
Creations. There are no assignments recorded in the USPTO for the patents in suit.
30.
On information and belief, as recently as September 1, 2015, Daniel Koren and
Daniel K have been advertising that the UTERNITY mounting is patented, with knowledge that
the
patents
are
invalid
and/or
unenforceable.
See
Exhibit
(http://www.dayandnightmagazine.com/dani-by-daniel-k-celebrates-a-milestoneyear#sthash.wGBn76yA.dpbs).
31.
Daniel K continues to advertise on its website that the UTERNITY rings are
protected by the 973 and 712 patents. See Exhibit 10 (http://danielk.net/about.php?item=5).

32.
On information and belief, Daniel K is asserting the 973 and 712 patents in an
attempt to monopolize the U.S. market for eternity bands with U-shaped mounting seats and/or
lessen competition within this market.
33.
On information and belief, Daniel K is an international company and has a
dangerous probability of succeeding in its lessening of competition and/or monopolization in the

U.S. market for eternity bands with U-shaped mounting seats.
34.
The 973 patent includes six claims, each of which claims are directed to an
eternity band having a multi-stone circular setting in combination with gemstones or diamonds.
The claims at issue here are at least claims 1-6 which are directed to the aforesaid eternity band
having a multi-stone circular setting in combination with gemstones or diamonds.
35.
Each of the claims of the 973 patent is limited to a plurality of U-shaped seats
being connected in series to form a circular configuration, and two upstanding prongs which
are shared with the adjacent U-shaped seats for seating adjacent gemstones so the side wall
surfaces of adjacent gemstones touch each other to provide the appearance of a single
continuous gemstone surface extending all the way around the eternity band. See Exhibit 1 - B
at p. 19 (column 6/lines 7-13).
36.
The accused eternity rings sold by ALPHA CREATIONS do not include, inter alia, a
plurality of U-shaped seats being connected in series to form a circular configuration of touching
gemstones extending all the way around the eternity band.
37.
The only claim of the 712 patent includes the ornamental design for an eternity
band with U-shaped seats for gemstones as shown and described, and a circular configuration
corresponding to that of the 973 patent is shown.
COUNT I: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,269,973
38.
Alpha Creations herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-37 as if fully
set forth at length.

39.
An immediate, real, and justiciable case or controversy exists between the parties
concerning the validity of the claims of the 973 patent.

40.
Claims 1-6 of the 973 patent are invalid for at least the following reasons:
A.
More than one year prior to the date of the application which matured
into the 973 patent, the subject matter thereof was described in a printed publication in
the United States or a foreign country, and thus claims 1-6 of the 973 patent are invalid
under Title 35 of the United States Code 102(b) (pre-AIA); and
8
B.
into the 973 patent, the subject matter thereof was in public use in the United States,
and thus claims 1-6 of the 973 patent are invalid under Title 35 of the United States Code
102(b) (pre-AIA); and
C.
into the 973 patent, the subject matter thereof was on sale in the United States, and thus
claims 1-6 of the 973 patent are invalid under Title 35 of the United States Code 102(b)
(pre-AIA); and
D.
The differences between the subject matter set forth in claims 1-6 of the
973 patent and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been
obvious, at the time of the purported invention thereof by Daniel Koren, to a person having
ordinary skill in that art. Thus, claims 1-6 of the 973 patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C.
103.
41.
Alpha Creations seeks a judgment that Claims 1-6 of the 973 patent are invalid.
COUNT II: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. D513,712

42.
ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-41 as if
fully set forth at length.

43.
concerning the validity of the 712 patent.

44.
The claim of the 712 patent is invalid for at least the following reasons:
A.
into the 712 patent, the subject matter thereof was described in a printed publication in
the United States or a foreign country, and thus the claim of the 712 patent is invalid
under Title 35 of the United States Code 102(b) (pre-AIA); and
B.
into the 712 patent, the subject matter thereof was in public use in the United States,
and thus the claim of the 712 patent is invalid under Title 35 of the United States Code
102(b) (pre-AIA); and
9
C.
into the 712 patent, the subject matter thereof was on sale in the United States, and thus
the claim of the 712 patent is invalid under Title 35 of the United States Code 102(b)
(pre-AIA); and
D.
The differences between the subject matter set forth in the claim of the
712 patent and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been
obvious, at the time of the purported invention thereof by Daniel Koren, to a person having
ordinary skill in that art. Thus, thus the claim of the 712 patent is invalid under Title 35 of
the United States Code 103 (pre-AIA).
45.
Alpha Creations seeks a judgment that the claim of the 712 patent is invalid.
COUNT III: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT

OF THE 973 PATENT
46.

47.
Specifically, Alpha Creations incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in
paragraphs 14-21 and 25 above.

48.
concerning the enforceability of the 973 patent.

49.
Alpha Creations seeks a judgment that the 973 patent is unenforceable under the
doctrine of inequitable conduct.

COUNT IV: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT
OF THE 712 PATENT
50.

51.
Specifically, Alpha Creations incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in
paragraphs 14-19 and 22-25 above.

52.

10
53.
doctrine of inequitable conduct.

COUNT V: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY FOR LACHES OF THE 973
PATENT
54.

55.

56.
doctrine of laches.
COUNT VI: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY FOR LACHES OF THE 712
PATENT
57.

58.

59.
doctrine of laches.
COUNT VII: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF THE 973 PATENT
60.

61.
Alpha Creations has not infringed and does not infringe, directly or indirectly, any
valid and enforceable claim of the 973 patent.

62.
concerning Alpha Creations alleged infringement of the 973 patent.

63.
Alpha Creations seeks a judgment that it does not infringe the 973 patent.
COUNT VIII: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF THE 712 PATENT

64.

11
65.
Alpha Creations has not infringed and does not infringe, directly or indirectly, any
valid and enforceable claim of the 712 patent.

66.
concerning Alpha Creations alleged infringement of the 712 patent.

67.
Alpha Creations seeks a judgment that it does not infringe the 712 patent.
COUNT IX: WALKER PROCESS FRAUD, ATTEMPTED MONOPOLIZATION UNDER 15 U.S.C. 2

68.

69.
During prosecution of the patents in suit, the inventor Daniel Koren and
prosecuting attorney Ezra Sutton failed to cite material prior art information and publication
showing, among other things, the printed public disclosure, sale and public use of the claimed
subject matter by Daniel Koren more than one year prior to the filing date of the patents in suit;
and misrepresented the prior art in a deceptive manner.
70.
The inventor Daniel Koren and, on information and belief, the prosecuting
attorney Ezra Sutton, withheld this prior printed public disclosure, sale, and public use
information from the Patent and Trademark Office examiners with deceptive intent.
71.
On information and belief, if the inventor Daniel Koren and the prosecuting
attorney Ezra Sutton had not withheld critical prior art information and had not misrepresented
the prior art in a deceptive manner, the Patent and Trademark Office would not have issued
either of the patents in suit.
72.
As a result, the inventor Daniel Koren obtained the patents in suit by knowingly
and willfully misrepresenting facts to the Patent and Trademark Office.

73.
Daniel Korens fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office is in
violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 2. Through this fraud, Daniel K engaged in
predatory or uncompetitive conduct with a specific intent to monopolize. With respect to the
allegations in this claim, the relevant geographic market is the United States.
74.
There is a dangerous probability that Daniel K will achieve monopoly power in the
U-shaped seat eternity mounting ring market.
12
75.
As a result of Daniel Ks unlawful acts, Alpha Creations has suffered and will
continue to suffer antitrust injury in an amount to be proven at trial. First, Daniel K has caused
Alpha Creations to stop selling the accused eternity rings while investigating Daniel Ks
infringement allegations. Second, Daniel K has forced Alpha Creations to expend substantial
money, time and human resources in order to defend against the allegations.
COUNT X: SHAM LITIGATION, ATTEMPTED MONOPOLIZATION UNDER 15 U.S.C. 2
76.

77.
On information and belief, when Daniel K threatened Alpha Creations with
infringement of the patents in suit, it knew that the patents in suit were invalid and unenforceable.
78.
On information and belief, Daniel Ks threatened infringement action was
objectively baseless because no reasonable litigant could conclude that Daniel Ks infringement
allegations were reasonably calculated to elicit a favorable outcome based upon Daniel Korens,
Ezra Suttons, and Daniel Ks inequitable and fraudulent conduct in obtaining the patents in suit,
as described herein.
79.
On information and belief, Daniel K did not have probable cause to assert the
claims in the cease and desist letter (Exhibit 1), because the patents in suit were invalid and
unenforceable.
80.
Through this sham litigation, Daniel K engaged in predatory or uncompetitive
conduct with a specific intent to monopolize.

81.
There is a dangerous probability that Daniel K will achieve monopoly power in the
U-shaped seat eternity mounting ring market.

82.
As a result of Daniel Ks unlawful acts, Alpha Creations has suffered and will
continue to suffer antitrust injury in an amount to be proven at trial. First, Daniel K has caused
Alpha Creations to stop selling the accused eternity rings while investigating Daniel Ks
infringement allegations. Second, Daniel K has forced Alpha Creations to expend substantial
money, time and human resources in order to defend against the allegations.
13
PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, ALPHA CREATIONS prays for judgment and relief as follows:
83.
Declaring that the 712 and 973 patents are invalid;
84.
Declaring that the 712 and 973 patents are unenforceable;
85.
Declaring that Alpha Creations does not infringe the 712 and 973 patents;
86.
Finding that this is an exceptional case under 3 U.S.C. 285;
87.
Finding that Daniel K violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 2 and
awarding treble damages;

88.
Permanently enjoining Daniel K from monopolizing or attempting to monopolize
the relevant product and geographic markets, as provided by 15 U.S.C. 26;

89.
Awarding Alpha Creations its costs and attorneys fees; and
90.
Such further and additional relief as the Court deems just and proper.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
91.
Alpha Creations demands a jury trial on all matters so triable.
Dated: August 8, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
Lundeen & Lundeen PLLC

/s/ Marcee G. Lundeen
Marcee G. Lundeen
State Bar No. 12695500
Fed. ID. 34855
marcee@lpats.com
Daniel N. Lundeen
State Bar No. 12695250
Fed. ID. 6524
dan@lpats.com
2710 Louisiana St.
14
Houston, Texas 77006

Tel: 713.652.2555
Fax: 713.652.2556
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, Alpha Creations,
Inc.
15
Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1-1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 1 of 24
EXHIBIT 1
EXHIBIT 2
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
1 of 28 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
2 of 38 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
3 of 48 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
4 of 58 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
5 of 68 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
6 of 78 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
7 of 88 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
8 of 98 of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
104of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
114of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
124of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
134of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of1410of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of1510of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of1610of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of1710of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of1810of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of1910of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of2010of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
8 of2110of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
9 of2210of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-2
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
10 of
2310
of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
247of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
257of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
267of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
277of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of
287of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of
297of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of
307of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of3120of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of3220of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of3320of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of3420of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of3520of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of3620of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of3720of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
8 of3820of 50
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
DocumentDocument
1-2 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
9 of3920of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
10 of
4020
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
11 of
4120
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
12 of
4220
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
13 of
4320
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
14 of
4420
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
15 of
4520
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
16 of
4620
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
17 of
4720
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
18 of
4820
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
19 of
4920
of 50
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04004-AJN
Document
Document
1-2 Filed
1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
20 of
5020
of 50
EXHIBIT 3
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
1 of28of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
2 of38of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
3 of48of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
4 of58of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
5 of68of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
6 of78of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
7 of88of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
8 of98of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
103of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
113of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
123of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
131of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of1410of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of1510of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of1610of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of1710of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of1810of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of1910of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of2010of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
8 of2110of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
9 of2210of 30
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
Document
Document
1-3 Filed
1-3
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
10 of
2310
of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
247of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
257of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
267of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
277of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of
287of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of
297of 30
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04001-LGS
DocumentDocument
1-3 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of
307of 30
EXHIBIT 4
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
1 of28of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
2 of38of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
3 of48of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
4 of58of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
5 of68of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
6 of78of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
7 of88of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document Document
1-4 Filed 1
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
8 of98of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
104of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
114of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
124of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
134of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
1410
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
1510
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
1610
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
1710
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of
1810
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of
1910
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of
2010
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
8 of
2110
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
9 of
2210
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
10 of
2310
of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
247of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
257of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
267of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
277of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of
287of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of
297of 54
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed 1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of
307of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
3124
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
3224
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
3324
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
3424
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of
3524
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of
3624
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of
3724
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
8 of
3824
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
DocumentDocument
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
9 of
3924
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
10 of
4024
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
11 of
4124
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
12 of
4224
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
13 of
4324
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
14 of
4424
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
15 of
4524
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
16 of
4624
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
17 of
4724
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
18 of
4824
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
19 of
4924
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
20 of
5024
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
21 of
5124
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
22 of
5224
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
23 of
5324
of 54
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04002-PGG
Document
Document
1-4 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
24 of
5424
of 54
EXHIBIT 5
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
1 of 28 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
2 of 38 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
3 of 48 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
4 of 58 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
5 of 68 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
6 of 78 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
7 of 88 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed 1in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
8 of 98 of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
103of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
113of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-1
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
123of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-2
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
131of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
149of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
159of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
169of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
179of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of
189of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of
199of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of
209of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
8 of
219of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-3
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
9 of
229of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
237of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of
247of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of
257of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of
267of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of
277of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of
287of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-4
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of
297of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of3018of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
2 of3118of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
3 of3218of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
4 of3318of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
5 of3418of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
6 of3518of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
7 of3618of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
8 of3718of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-5
in TXSD
Filed on
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
9 of3818of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
10 of
3918
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
11 of
4018
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
12 of
4118
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
13 of
4218
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
14 of
4318
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
15 of
4418
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
16 of
4518
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
17 of
4618
of 48
Case
Case
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
Document
Document
1-5 Filed
1-5
in TXSD
Filed 05/27/16
on 08/08/16
Page
Page
18 of
4718
of 48
CaseCase
4:16-cv-02390
1:16-cv-04000-JPO
DocumentDocument
1-5 Filed1-6
in TXSD
Filedon
05/27/16
08/08/16Page
Page
1 of
481of 48
EXHIBIT 6
Generated on: This page was generated by TSDR on 2016-07-30 18:32:51 EDT
Mark: UTERNITY
US Serial Number: 78371065
Application Filing Feb. 20, 2004

Date:
US Registration 2962475
Number:
Registration Date: Jun. 14, 2005
Register: Principal
Mark Type: Trademark
Status: The registration has been renewed.
Status Date: Jul. 11, 2015
Publication Date: Mar. 22, 2005
Mark Information
Mark Literal UTERNITY
Elements:
Standard Character Yes. The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.
Claim:
Mark Drawing 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK
Type:
Goods and Services

Note: The following symbols indicate that the registrant/owner has amended the goods/services:
Brackets [..] indicate deleted goods/services;
Double parenthesis ((..)) identify any goods/services not claimed in a Section 15 affidavit of incontestability; and
Asterisks *..* identify additional (new) wording in the goods/services.
For: Watches, Watch bands and straps and Jewelry, namely-- necklaces, bracelets, rings, pendants and charms, brooches, cuff links
International 014 - Primary Class
Class(es):
U.S Class(es): 002, 027, 028, 050
Class Status: ACTIVE

Basis: 1(a)
First Use: Oct. 01, 2003
Use in Commerce: Dec. 02, 2003
Basis Information (Case Level)

Filed Use: Yes
Currently Use: Yes
Amended Use: No
Filed ITU: No
Currently ITU: No
Amended ITU: No
Filed 44D: No
Currently 44D: No
Amended 44D: No
Filed 44E: No
Currently 44E: No
Amended 44E: No
Filed 66A: No
Currently 66A: No
Filed No Basis: No
Currently No Basis: No
Current Owner(s) Information

Owner Name: SHAER LICENSING CORP.

Owner Address: 2711 CENTERVILLE RD.
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19808
UNITED STATES
Legal Entity Type: CORPORATION
State or Country DELAWARE

Where Organized:
Attorney/Correspondence Information
Attorney of Record
Attorney Name: EZRA SUTTON
Docket Number: 10.1-1-001

Correspondent
Correspondent EZRA SUTTON

Name/Address: EZRA SUTTON, P.A.
900 ROUTE 9
WOODBRIDGE, NEW JERSEY 07095
UNITED STATES
Correspondent e- ESSUTTON@EZRASUTTON.COM
mail:
Correspondent e- Yes
mail Authorized:
Domestic Representative - Not Found
Prosecution History
Date
Proceeding
Number
Description
Jul. 14, 2015
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED
Jul. 12, 2015
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jul. 11, 2015
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)
68973
Jul. 11, 2015
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED
68973
Jun. 18, 2015
REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
68973
Jun. 18, 2015
REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Jul. 11, 2015
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun. 18, 2015
PAPER RECEIVED
Jun. 03, 2015
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug. 16, 2011
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED
Aug. 16, 2011
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
76533
Jun. 10, 2011
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
76533
Aug. 16, 2011
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
76533
Jun. 10, 2011
PAPER RECEIVED
Jun. 14, 2005
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar. 22, 2005
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
Mar. 02, 2005
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep. 22, 2004
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
74189
Sep. 22, 2004
ASSIGNED TO LIE
74189
Sep. 15, 2004
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep. 11, 2004
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar. 05, 2004
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM
68973
76135
Maintenance Filings or Post Registration Information

Affidavit of Section 8 - Accepted
Continued Use:
Affidavit of Section 15 - Accepted
Incontestability:
Renewal Date: Jun. 14, 2015
TM Staff and Location Information

TM Staff Information - None
File Location
Current Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE
Date in Location: Jul. 11, 2015
Assignment Abstract Of Title Information

Summary
Total Assignments: 1
Registrant: Daniel K, Inc.
Assignment 1 of 1
Conveyance: ASSIGNS THE ENTIRE INTEREST
Reel/Frame: 5524/0833
Pages: 3
Date Recorded: May 21, 2015

Supporting assignment-tm-5524-0833.pdf
Documents:
Assignor
Name: DANIEL K, INC.
Execution Date: Apr. 13, 2015

State or Country NEW YORK
Where Organized:
Assignee
Name: SHAER LICENSING CORP.

State or Country DELAWARE

Where Organized:
Address: 2711 CENTERVILLE RD.

WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19808
Correspondent
Correspondent JOSEPH SUTTON, ESQ.
Name:
Correspondent 900 ROUTE 9
Address: SUITE 201
WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095
Domestic Representative - Not Found
Side - 1
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF 8
DECLARATION AND 9 RENEWAL
MAILING DATE: Jul 14, 2015
The declaration and renewal application filed in connection with the registration identified below meets the requirements of Sections 8 and 9 of the
Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1058 and 1059. The declaration is accepted and renewal is granted. The registration remains in force.
For further information about this notice, visit our website at: http://www.uspto.gov. To review information regarding the referenced registration, go to
http://tarr.uspto.gov.
REG NUMBER:
MARK:
OWNER:
2962475
UTERNITY(STANDARD CHARACTER MARK)
SHAER LICENSING CORP.
Side - 2
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
COMMISSIONER FOR TRADEMARKS
P.O. BOX 1451
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1451
FIRST-CLASS MAIL
U.S POSTAGE
PAID
EZRA SUTTON
EZRA SUTTON, P.A.
900 ROUTE 9
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
TMOfficialNotices@USPTO.GOV
Sunday, July 12, 2015 02:41 AM
ESSUTTON@EZRASUTTON.COM
Official USPTO Notice of Acceptance and Renewal Sections 8 and 9: U.S. Trademark RN 2962475: UTERNITY: Docket/Reference No. 10.1-1-001
Serial Number: 78371065

Registration Number: 2962475
Registration Date: Jun 14, 2005
Mark: UTERNITY
Owner: SHAER LICENSING CORP.
Jul 11, 2015

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE UNDER SECTION 8
The declaration of use or excusable nonuse filed for the above-identified registration meets the requirements of Section 8 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1058. The Section
8 declaration is accepted.
NOTICE OF REGISTRATION RENEWAL UNDER SECTION 9

The renewal application filed for the above-identified registration meets the requirements of Section 9 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1059. The registration is renewed.
The registration will remain in force for the class(es) listed below for the remainder of the ten-year period, calculated from the registration date, unless canceled by
an order of the Commissioner for Trademarks or a Federal Court.
Class(es):
014
TRADEMARK SPECIALIST
POST-REGISTRATION DIVISION
571-272-9500
REQUIREMENTS FOR MAINTAINING REGISTRATION IN SUCCESSIVE TEN-YEAR PERIODS

WARNING: Your registration will be canceled if you do not file the documents below during the specified time periods.
What and When to File: You must file a declaration of use (or excusable nonuse) and an application for renewal between every 9th and 10th-year period, calculated from the
registration date. See 15 U.S.C. 1058, 1059.
Grace Period Filings
The above documents will be considered as timely if filed within six months after the deadlines listed above with the payment of an additional fee.
***The USPTO WILL NOT SEND ANY FURTHER NOTICE OR REMINDER OF THESE REQUIREMENTS. THE REGISTRANT SHOULD CONTACT THE USPTO ONE
YEAR BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THE TIME PERIODS SHOWN ABOVE TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS AND FEES.***
To view this notice and other documents for this application on-line, go to http://tdr.uspto.gov/search.action?sn=78371065. NOTE: This notice will only be available on-line the
next business day after receipt of this e-mail.
Side - 1
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE AND

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF 8 & 15
DECLARATION
MAILING DATE: Aug 16, 2011
The combined declaration of use and incontestability filed in connection with the registration identified below meets the requirements of Sections 8
and 15 of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1058 and 1065. The combined declaration is accepted and acknowledged. The registration remains in
force.
For further information about this notice, visit our website at: http://www.uspto.gov. To review information regarding the referenced registration, go to
http://tarr.uspto.gov.
REG NUMBER:
2962475
MARK:
OWNER:
UTERNITY
Daniel K, Inc.
Side - 2
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
COMMISSIONER FOR TRADEMARKS
P.O. BOX 1451
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1451
FIRST-CLASS MAIL
U.S POSTAGE
PAID
EZRA SUTTON
EZRA SUTTON, P.A.
900 ROUTE 9
Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria , VA 22313-1451
www.uspto.gov
Mar 2, 2005
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION UNDER 12(a)

1.
Serial No.:
78/371,065
3.
International Class(es):
14
4.
Publication Date:
Mar 22, 2005
2.
Mark:
UTERNITY
Standard Character Mark
5.
Applicant:
Daniel K, Inc.
The mark of the application identified appears to be entitled to registration. The mark will, in accordance with Section 12(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946, as amended, be
published in the Official Gazette on the date indicated above for the purpose of opposition by any person who believes he will be damaged by the registration of the mark. If no
opposition is filed within the time specified by Section 13(a) of the Statute or by rules 2.101 or 2.102 of the Trademark Rules, the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks may
issue a certificate of registration.
Copies of the trademark portion of the Official Gazette containing the publication of the mark may be obtained from:
The Superintendent of Documents
U.S. Government Printing Office
PO Box 371954
Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
Phone: (202) 512-1800
By direction of the Commissioner.
Correspondence Address:
JEFFREY DWECK
THE LAW FIRM OF JEFFREY S. DWECK, P.C.
100 WEST 33RD STREET
SUITE 1013
NEW YORK, NY 10001
TMP&I
*** User:tgaskins ***

#
Total
Dead
Live
Live
Status/
Marks
Marks
Viewed
Viewed
Search
Docs
Images
Duration
01
0:02
78371065[SN]
02
535
N/A
0:10
*{v}t{v}rn{v}t*[bi,ti]
03
229
229
110
0:06
2 not dead[ld]
04
48
32
16
0:02
*ut{v}rn*[bi,ti]
Session started 9/11/04 6:05:07 PM

Session finished 9/11/04 6:10:50 PM
Total search duration 0 minutes 20 seconds
Session duration 5 minutes 43 seconds
Defaut NEAR limit=1ADJ limit=1
Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 78371065
Search

PTO Form 1478 (Rev 6/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0009 (Exp xx/xx/xxxx)
Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register

Filing Date: 02/20/2004
The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
MARK SECTION
MARK
UTERNITY
STANDARD CHARACTERS
YES
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE
YES
LITERAL ELEMENT
UTERNITY
MARK STATEMENT
The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any

particular font, style, size, or color.
OWNER SECTION
NAME
Daniel K, Inc.
INTERNAL ADDRESS
Suite 1300
STREET
15 West 47th Street
CITY
New York
STATE
NY
ZIP/POSTAL CODE
10036
COUNTRY
USA
PHONE
212-759-7604
AUTHORIZED EMAIL COMMUNICATION
No
LEGAL ENTITY SECTION

TYPE
CORPORATION
STATE/COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION
New York
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION

INTERNATIONAL CLASS
014
DESCRIPTION
Watches, Watch bands and straps and Jewelry, namely:

necklaces, bracelets, rings, pendants and charms, brooches,
cuff links.
FILING BASIS
Section 1(a)
FIRST USE ANYWHERE DATE
At least as early as 10/01/2003
FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE
At least as early as 12/02/2003
SPECIMEN FILE NAME(S)
\\ticrs\EXPORT9\IMAGEOUT9 \783\710\78371065\xml1\AP
P0003.JPG
\\ticrs\EXPORT9\IMAGEOUT9 \783\710\78371065\xml1\AP
P0004.JPG
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
Advertising and point of purchase displays used in connection

with the goods. Note that industry standard (jewelry) is not to
include hangtags or packaging with trademarks.
SIGNATURE SECTION
SIGNATURE
/Daniel Koren/
SIGNATORY NAME
Daniel Koren
SIGNATORY DATE
02/20/2004
SIGNATORY POSITION
Vice President
PAYMENT SECTION
NUMBER OF CLASSES
NUMBER OF CLASSES PAID
SUBTOTAL AMOUNT
335
TOTAL AMOUNT
335
ATTORNEY
NAME
Jeffrey Dweck
FIRM NAME
The Law Firm Of Jeffrey S. Dweck, P.C.
INTERNAL ADDRESS
Suite 1013
STREET
100 West 33rd Street
CITY
New York
STATE
NY
ZIP/POSTAL CODE
10001
COUNTRY
USA
PHONE
212-502-6150
FAX
212-502-2010
EMAIL
Jeffrey@dweckny.com
Yes
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION
NAME
Jeffrey Dweck
FIRM NAME
The Law Firm Of Jeffrey S. Dweck, P.C.
INTERNAL ADDRESS
Suite 1013
STREET
CITY
New York
STATE
NY
ZIP/POSTAL CODE
10001
COUNTRY
USA
PHONE
212-502-6150
FAX
212-502-2010

EMAIL
Jeffrey@dweckny.com
Yes
FILING INFORMATION
SUBMIT DATE
Fri Feb 20 09:33:54 EST 2004
TEAS STAMP
USPTO/BAS-XXXXXXXXXXX-200
40220093354136031-7837106
5-200559981264454287cfd2d
39737a5c675f-CC-819-20040
220093259060279

PTO Form 1478 (Rev 6/2005)
OMB No. 0651-0009 (Exp xx/xx/xxxx)
Trademark/Service Mark Application, Principal Register

Filing Date: 02/20/2004
To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

MARK: (Standard Characters, see mark)
The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font, style, size, or color.
The literal element of the mark consists of UTERNITY.
The applicant, Daniel K, Inc., a corporation of New York, residing at Suite 1300, 15 West 47th Street, New York, NY, USA, 10036, requests
registration of the trademark/service mark identified above in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the Principal Register established
by the Act of July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. Section 1051 et seq.), as amended.
The applicant, or the applicant's related company or licensee, is using the mark in commerce, and lists below the dates of use by the applicant, or
the applicant's related company, licensee, or predecessor in interest, of the mark on or in connection with the identified goods and/or services. 15
U.S.C. Section 1051(a), as amended.
International Class 014: Watches, Watch bands and straps and Jewelry, namely: necklaces, bracelets, rings, pendants and charms, brooches,
cuff links.
In International Class 014, the mark was first used at least as early as 10/01/2003, and first used in commerce at least as early as 12/02/2003, and
is now in use in such commerce. The applicant is submitting or will submit one specimen for each class showing the mark as used in commerce
on or in connection with any item in the class of listed goods and/or services, consisting of a(n) Advertising and point of purchase displays used
in connection with the goods. Note that industry standard (jewelry) is not to include hangtags or packaging with trademarks..
Specimen - 1
Specimen - 2
The applicant hereby appoints Jeffrey Dweck of The Law Firm Of Jeffrey S. Dweck, P.C., Suite 1013, 100 West 33rd Street, New York, NY,
USA, 10001 to submit this application on behalf of the applicant.
The USPTO is authorized to communicate with the applicant or its representative at the following email address: Jeffrey@dweckny.com.
A fee payment in the amount of $335 will be submitted with the application, representing payment for 1 class(es).
Declaration
The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under
18 U.S.C. Section 1001, and that such willful false statements, and the like, may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting
registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be
the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b), he/she
believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or
association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely,
when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; and that all
statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
Signature: /Daniel Koren/ Date: 02/20/2004

Signatory's Name: Daniel Koren
Signatory's Position: Vice President

Mailing Address:
Jeffrey Dweck
Suite 1013
New York, NY 10001
RAM Sale Number: 819
RAM Accounting Date: 02/20/2004
Internet Transmission Date: Fri Feb 20 09:33:54 EST 2004
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/BAS-XXXXXXXXXXX-200402200933541360
31-78371065-200559981264454287cfd2d39737
a5c675f-CC-819-20040220093259060279
EXHIBIT 7
EXHIBIT 8
EXHIBIT 9
DANI by Daniel K celebrates a milestone year - Day and Night Magazine
http://www.dayandnightmagazine.com/dani-by-daniel-k-celebrates-a-milestone-year#sthash.wG...
Home
Online Magazine
Annual Editions
Subscribe
Profile
Advertising
Watchmaking Terms
Contact Us
Interviews
DANI by Daniel K celebrates a milestone year
RSS Feeds
Sep 01, 2015

20
Daniel Koren developed a passion for fine jewellery from a young age. As the son of a second-generation diamond
dealer, he was captivated by the glamour surrounding the precious stones industry and set upon a career in fine
jewellery, which ultimately led to the launch of his brand, Daniel K, in New York in 1999
In 2005, his signature designs, such as the unique Uternity rings with unusually set square emerald cut diamonds
1 of 7
8/8/2016 2:39 PM

and the imaginative Reverso collection of multifunctional jewels, led to the entrepreneur scooping the JQ
Magazine Designer of the Year award. From that point, the Daniel K brand continued to grow in prestige and
presence, boasting numerous A-list celebrities among its clients and retailing in a diverse range of global markets
including the US, Dubai, Australia and Russia.
By 2014, Koren launched his first diffusion fine jewellery collection, labelled DANI by Daniel K, which showcases
jewels set in sterling silver. The new brand made its worldwide debut at Baselworld, and recently celebrated its first
milestone year in 2015. Day and Night magazine stopped by the brands booth at Baselworld 2015, for an
indulgent chat with Daniel Koren to find out the ins and outs of running a successful business.
Can you tell us about the history of the brand?

The history of DANI by Daniel K is a very short-lived one, where the concept of the diffusion line came up around
two years ago. However, we are only just celebrating our first year milestone at this years Baselworld from when
our jewellery was first showcased. DANI by Daniel K is an extension of my primary brand, Daniel K that
specialises in jewellery crafted with real gems set in either gold or platinum. It is different from its sister-brand
because the new brand marks a departure in traditional materials by only using sterling silver and simulated
jewels, which are all hand-cut and polished in-house. The collection retains the innovative designs and
craftsmanship associated with the Daniel K brand with a much more affordable price tag, allowing the larger public
to become a valuable DANI by Daniel K client.
2 of 7
8/8/2016 2:39 PM

What are the core values of DANI by Daniel K?
The core values are demonstrated in our marketing campaign slogan, I live my dream, which encourages women
to aspire to their ideal character. The brand enables luxury accessories to be within easy reach of the masses,
where women can feel beautiful and special whilst still looking after the purse-strings. Alternatively, women enjoy a
variety of options that offer different styles and colours and by choosing to wear DANI by Daniel K products, they
are able to buy as many jewels as they want without ever having to worry about insurance policies or losing the
jewellery on a big night out.
How do you ensure the brands creates authentic looking jewellery pieces?
My background is in the high-end jewellery market. I have experience working with real precious stones and
precious materials such as gold and platinum. With my existing knowledge and primary brand, Daniel K, I am able
to ensure all DANI by Daniel K creations are finished to an exceptional standard using high-quality simulated
stones that look and feel like the real thing. Our role doesnt stop at simply creating the finished piece; we also
ensure our packaging and window displays are presented in the same manner as if a customer was buying the
real thing. By combining these three aspects, we guarantee the customer will experience fine jewellery offered at a
reasonable price at its very best.
Do you design all the pieces yourself?

As the Creative Director of the company, all designs are finalised by me. I have a team of artists who are
3 of 7
8/8/2016 2:39 PM

instructed with details of what I am currently looking for in a piece and they go away and come up with sketches.
These drawings are then discussed in detail and I make the necessary changes to eliminate any design flaws.
Once I feel the product looks right, the final go-ahead is given to send the sketch to the production department to
create a 3D sample.
What advantages are there of buying simulated jewellery?

Other than what I mentioned earlier about purchasing costs and not worrying about insurance policies, the other
main advantage is for frequent fliers. When travelling with high-end jewellery it can be very stressful to deal with
customs, insurance forms and security of the valuables whilst staying in a hotel. Hence our trademark Travel with
luxury comes into play, where our customers can commission replicas of their own jewellery or simply purchase
our existing pieces to travel with confidence that their jewels are safeguarded and what they are wearing looks
authentic and stunning where nobody is the wiser.
Are there any plans to use gold in the future?

We use plated gold on some of our pieces. Whether its rose gold or yellow gold, we use 2.5 microns to ensure a
smooth finish. However, I should mention that we also offer a bespoke service to our clients, where if they want us
to substitute the existing silver material for a pure gold one, then we can do that as a special order service, but we
would not change the design, setting or stone of that particular piece just the casting of the metal would change.
4 of 7
8/8/2016 2:39 PM

What is this years most popular piece?
The best seller would have to be the Uternity Band Ring, which boasts a patented U-shaped mounting. This ring
can also be tailored under the Daniel K brand to be crafted in platinum with real diamonds.
Where are your materials sourced from?

Our simulated diamonds and cubic zirconia are sourced from the United States as they provide the purest,
cleanest and widest range of rough stones. However, the rubies, sapphires and other stones we use are
purchased from Switzerland from laboratories. The cutting and polishing of these stones are all done in-house.
5 of 7
8/8/2016 2:39 PM
http://www.danibydk.com/
Related Articles:
go back
6 of 7
8/8/2016 2:39 PM

Home
OnlineMagazine
Luxury Publications 2016
7 of 7
AnnualEdi ons
Subscribe
Profile
Adver sing
WatchmakingTerms
ContactUs
Day and Night Magazine
8/8/2016 2:39 PM
EXHIBIT 10
Daniel K
http://danielk.net/about.php?item=5
1 of 2
8/8/2016 2:43 PM
Daniel K
http://danielk.net/about.php?item=5
2 of 2
8/8/2016 2:43 PM
JS 44 (Rev. 07/16)
CIVIL COVER SHEET
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as
provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the
purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.)
I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS
Alpha Creations, Inc.
Daniel K. Fine Jewelry USA, LLC.
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff
Harris
County of Residence of First Listed Defendant
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)

NOTE:
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)
(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)

IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
Attorneys (If Known)
Lundeen & Lundeen PLLC, 2710 Louisiana St., Houston, TX 77006

7136522555; Marcee G. Lundeen and Daniel N. Lundeen
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an X in One Box Only)

1
U.S. Government
Plaintiff
Federal Question
(U.S. Government Not a Party)
U.S. Government
Defendant
Diversity
(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an X in One Box for Plaintiff

(For Diversity Cases Only)
PTF
Citizen of This State
1
DEF
1
and One Box for Defendant)

PTF
DEF
Incorporated or Principal Place
4
4
of Business In This State
Citizen of Another State
Incorporated and Principal Place

of Business In Another State
Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country
Foreign Nation
IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an X in One Box Only)

CONTRACT
TORTS
110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted
Student Loans
(Excludes Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veterans Benefits
160 Stockholders Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise
REAL PROPERTY
210 Land Condemnation
220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
240 Torts to Land
245 Tort Product Liability
290 All Other Real Property
PERSONAL INJURY
310 Airplane
315 Airplane Product
Liability
320 Assault, Libel &
Slander
330 Federal Employers
Liability
340 Marine
345 Marine Product
Liability
350 Motor Vehicle
355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability
360 Other Personal
Injury
362 Personal Injury Medical Malpractice
CIVIL RIGHTS
440 Other Civil Rights
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/
Accommodations
445 Amer. w/Disabilities Employment
446 Amer. w/Disabilities Other
448 Education
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
PERSONAL INJURY
365 Personal Injury Product Liability
367 Health Care/
Pharmaceutical
Personal Injury
Product Liability
368 Asbestos Personal
Injury Product
Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY
370 Other Fraud
371 Truth in Lending
380 Other Personal
Property Damage
385 Property Damage
Product Liability
PRISONER PETITIONS
Habeas Corpus:
463 Alien Detainee
510 Motions to Vacate
Sentence
530 General
535 Death Penalty
Other:
540 Mandamus & Other
550 Civil Rights
555 Prison Condition
560 Civil Detainee Conditions of
Confinement
625 Drug Related Seizure

of Property 21 USC 881
690 Other
BANKRUPTCY
422 Appeal 28 USC 158
423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
PROPERTY RIGHTS
820 Copyrights
830 Patent
840 Trademark
LABOR
710 Fair Labor Standards
Act
720 Labor/Management
Relations
740 Railway Labor Act
751 Family and Medical
Leave Act
790 Other Labor Litigation
791 Employee Retirement
Income Security Act
SOCIAL SECURITY
861 HIA (1395ff)
862 Black Lung (923)
863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
864 SSID Title XVI
865 RSI (405(g))
FEDERAL TAX SUITS

870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff
or Defendant)
871 IRSThird Party
26 USC 7609
IMMIGRATION
462 Naturalization Application
465 Other Immigration
Actions
OTHER STATUTES
375 False Claims Act
376 Qui Tam (31 USC
3729(a))
400 State Reapportionment
410 Antitrust
430 Banks and Banking
450 Commerce
460 Deportation
470 Racketeer Influenced and
Corrupt Organizations
480 Consumer Credit
490 Cable/Sat TV
850 Securities/Commodities/
Exchange
890 Other Statutory Actions
891 Agricultural Acts
893 Environmental Matters
895 Freedom of Information
Act
896 Arbitration
899 Administrative Procedure
Act/Review or Appeal of
Agency Decision
950 Constitutionality of
State Statutes
V. ORIGIN (Place an X in One Box Only)

1 Original
Proceeding
2 Removed from
State Court
6 Multidistrict
Litigation Transfer
(specify)
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
Remanded from
Appellate Court
4 Reinstated or
Reopened
5 Transferred from
Another District
8 Multidistrict
Litigation Direct File
28 U.S.C. 2201, 2202
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION Brief description of cause:
Declaratory judgment for patent invalidity, unenforceability, noninfringement, Walker Process fraud and sham litigai
CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION

VII. REQUESTED IN
UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
COMPLAINT:
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
(See instructions):
IF ANY
JUDGE
DATE
CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:

Yes
No
JURY DEMAND:
DEMAND $
DOCKET NUMBER
SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
/Marcee G. Lundeen/
08/08/2016
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT #
AMOUNT
Print
APPLYING IFP
Save As...
JUDGE
MAG. JUDGE
Reset

Alpha Creations v. Daniel K - Complaint

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Alpha Creations v. Daniel K - Complaint

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ALPHA CREATIONS, INC.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-cv-02390

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

On information and belief, Defendant, Daniel K is a corporation organized under

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 2 of 15

Declaratory relief is necessary because Plaintiff has a reasonable apprehension of

Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and 1400(b)

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 3 of 15

A justiciable case or controversy therefore exits between Alpha Creations and

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 4 of 15

February 2004 Couture International Jeweler Ad/Point of Sale Display

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 5 of 15

On information and belief, Daniel Koren made and/or made arrangements to

Contemporaneously with the publication and registration of the UTERNITY

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 6 of 15

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 7 of 15

On information and belief, Daniel Koren executed a power of attorney appointing

the UTERNITY registration. See Exhibit 6 at pp. 6-11.

On information and belief, as recently as September 1, 2015, Daniel Koren and

protected by the 973 and 712 patents. See Exhibit 10 (http://danielk.net/about.php?item=5).

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 8 of 15

On information and belief, Daniel K is an international company and has a

dangerous probability of succeeding in its lessening of competition and/or monopolization in the

Alpha Creations herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-37 as if fully

set forth at length.

concerning the validity of the claims of the 973 patent.

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 9 of 15

COUNT II: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. D513,712

ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-41 as if

fully set forth at length.

concerning the validity of the 712 patent.

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 10 of 15

COUNT III: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT

ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-45 as if

fully set forth at length.

Specifically, Alpha Creations incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in

paragraphs 14-21 and 25 above.

concerning the enforceability of the 973 patent.

doctrine of inequitable conduct.

ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-49 as if

fully set forth at length.

Specifically, Alpha Creations incorporates by reference the allegations set forth in

paragraphs 14-19 and 22-25 above.

concerning the enforceability of the 712 patent.

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 11 of 15

doctrine of inequitable conduct.

ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-53 as if

fully set forth at length.

concerning the enforceability of the 973 patent.

ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-56 as if

fully set forth at length.

concerning the enforceability of the 712 patent.

ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-59 as if

fully set forth at length.

valid and enforceable claim of the 973 patent.

concerning Alpha Creations alleged infringement of the 973 patent.

COUNT VIII: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF THE 712 PATENT

ALPHA CREATIONS herein incorporates the allegations of paragraphs 1-63 as if

fully set forth at length.

Case 4:16-cv-02390 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/08/16 Page 12 of 15

valid and enforceable claim of the 712 patent.

concerning Alpha Creations alleged infringement of the 712 patent.