AO 310 (Rev.

03/16)

THIRD

Judicial Council of the

Circuit

COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY

To begin the complaint process, complete this form and prepare the brief statement of facts described in
item 4 (below). The RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDICIAL-DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS, adopted by the
Judicial Conference of the United States, contain information on what to include in a complaint (Rule 6), where
to file a complaint (Rule 7), and other important matters. The Rules are available in federal court clerks offices,
on individual federal courts websites, and on www.uscourts.gov.
Your complaint (this form and the statement of facts) should be typewritten and must be legible. For the number
of copies to file, consult the local rules or clerks office of the court in which your complaint is required to be filed.
Enclose each copy of the complaint in an envelope marked COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT or
COMPLAINT OF DISABILITY and submit it to the appropriate clerk of court. Do not put the name of any
judge on the envelope.
1.

2.

3.

Name of Complainant:

Stanley J. Caterbone

Contact Address:

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603

Daytime telephone:

Name(s) of Judge(s):

Edward Smith and Anita J. Brody and Paul Diamond and Curtis

Court:

Joyner - US District for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

717

) 669-2163

Does this complaint concern the behavior of the judge(s) in a particular lawsuit or lawsuits?

Yes

No

If yes, give the following information about each lawsuit:

Court:

U.S. District Court/Third Circuit

Case Number:

16-mc-49; 14-02559; 15-03984; /16-1149;15-3400;16-1001

Docket number of any appeal to the

Circuit:

Are (were) you a party or lawyer in the lawsuit?

Party

Lawyer

Neither

If you are (were) a party and have (had) a lawyer, give the lawyers name, address, and telephone
number:
APPEAR PRO SE

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page 1 of 2

Page
Page11of
of18
7

July 28, 2016

AO 310 (Rev. 03/16)

Judicial Council of the

THIRD

Circuit

COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY

4.

Brief Statement of Facts. Attach a brief statement of the specific facts on which the claim of judicial
misconduct or disability is based. Include what happened, when and where it happened, and any
information that would help an investigator check the facts. If the complaint alleges judicial disability,
also include any additional facts that form the basis of that allegation.

5.

Declaration and signature:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements made in this complaint are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge.

Signature:

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Print

Date:

Page 2 of 2

Page
Page22of
of18
7

Save As...

07/28/2016

July 28, 2016

Reset

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page 3 of 18

July 28, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY

To begin the complaint process, complete this form and prepare the brief statement of
facts described in item 4 (below). The RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDICIAL-DISABILITY
PROCEEDINGS, adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, contain information on
what to include in a complaint (Rule 6), where to file a complaint (Rule 7), and other important
matters. The Rules are available in federal court clerks offices, on individual federal courts
websites, and on www.uscourts.gov. Your complaint (this form and the statement of facts) should
be typewritten and must be legible. For the number of copies to file, consult the local rules or
clerks office of the court in which your complaint is required to be filed. Enclose each copy of the
complaint in an envelope marked COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT or COMPLAINT OF DISABILITY
and submit it to the appropriate clerk of court. Do not put the name of any judge on the
envelope.
SEE THE FOLLOWING BRIEF STATEMENT

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page
Page43of
of18
7

July 28, 2016

BRIEF STATEMENT FOR THE

COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY

I) FIRST COMPLAINT
On April 14, 2016 the Clerk of Court issued an order transferring this case from The
Honorable Anita J. Brody, of the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to
The Honorable Edward G. Smith of the Larry Holmes Federal Courthouse in Easton Pennsylvania.
The order is item no. 2 in this case' court docket sheet. See Exhibit No. 1. It should be noted
that The Honorable Judge Anita Brody had heard similar appeals for the APPELANT'S
previous Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059.
On July 6, 2016 the APPELLANT filed a MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE and requested
that the Hearing of July 19, 2016 be moved to either the Federal Bankruptcy Court in Reading,
Pennsylvania or the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Motion reads:
AND NOW, on this 5TH day of July, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION FOR CHANGE OF
VENUE TO PHILADELPHIA for the HEARING of July 19, 2016, according to ORDER of
June 28, 2016 by the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith. The Allentown Courthouse is an
inconvenience and would place an undo hardship on the APPELLANT.

Given that the

APPELLANT must visit the Philadelphia Courthouse to copy dockets due to the fact that the
APPELLANT'S Pacer Account has been maliciously and erroneously closed due to computer
hackers,

it

would

appear

that

this

MOTION

FOR

CHANGE

OF

VENUE

TO

PHILADELPHIA should be granted.

On July 19, 2016 the APPELLANT filed an EXHIBIT in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse which
read the following:
AND NOW, on this 19TH day of July, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION TO FILE
EXHIBIT re Press Release and Executive Summary re CATERBONE v. the United
States of America, et.al., July 16, 2016 in response to the ORDER of June 28, 2016 by
the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith. It is now 6:57pm on Monday, July 18, 2016
and the computer hackers WOULD NOT allow mapquest on my computer find the
Larry Holmes Building in Easton, PA. I have no choice but to file this EXHIBIT in
U.S. District Court in Philadelphia on July 19, 2016.
On July 19, 2016 the APPELLANT called the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith's Clerk and
notified the clerk that on the morning of July 19, 2016, the day of the HEARING, the APPELLANT
had first traveled to the vicinity of Norristown, Pennsylvania, in order to file the Court of Common

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page
Page54of
of18
7

July 28, 2016

Pleas of Montgomery County Case No. CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE re

Kathleen Kane Amicus in Support of Motion to DISMISS Charges July 20, 2016 in the
Montgomery County Courthouse. Again, like before the APPELLANT'S GPS mapping system on his
Samsung 6S smartphone was again compromised by a computer hacker that left the APPELLANT
driving around in circles for nearly 2 hours. In addition upon trying to locate the address of the
Montgomery County Courthouse, the address changed from Norristown to Willow Grove. Needless
to say the APPELLANT never did file the Amicus. It will be filed today. In addition the APPELLANT
is recorded as being the AMICUS in Superior Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 for Pennsylvania
Attorney General Kathleen Kane. The APPELLANT is alleging judicial misconduct by the Clerk of
Court for maliciously and purposefully inconveniencing the APPELLLANT in an effort to have the
APPELLANT miss the court hearing of July 19, 2016 in an effort to have this case dismissed and
sanctions imposed.

The traveling time is approximately and additional one hour and most

importantly is unfamiliar territory making the computer hacking all that much more devastating to
the APPELLANT.
On July 27, 2018 the COMPLAINTANT again called the Clerk of Judge Edward Smth for
guidance as the the Show Cause ORDER of July 20, 2016. The ORDER states the following:
[AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2016, the appellant having filed an application for leave
to proceed in forma pauperis in connection with this purported bankruptcy appeal; and the court
having entered an order on June 28, 2016, which, inter alia, scheduled a hearing on the
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for July 19, 2016 (Doc. No. 7); and the court
having denied the appellants request to change the venue of the hearing (Doc. Nos. 9, 10); and
the court having reiterated that the appellant must appear in Easton for the hearing, see Order,
Doc. No. 10; and the appellant nonetheless having failed to appear for the hearing because he
claims that the computer hackers WOULD NOT allow mapquest on [his] computer [to] find the
Larry Holmes Building in Easton, PA, see Motion to File Exhibit re Press Release and Executive
Summary re Caterbone v. the United States of America, et[] al., July 16, 2016 at
1, Doc. No. 15;1 accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The appellant shall SHOW CAUSE why this court should not impose sanctions
for his failure to appear for the hearing on July 19, 2016;

2. The appellant shall file any written response with the court electronically by no
later than July 27, 2016;
3.

If the appellant fails to respond to the order to show cause, the court will deem

him in favor of dismissing this appeal;

and

4. The court will hold a hearing on the order to show cause on Thursday, July 28,
2016, at 1:00 p.m. at the Holmes Building, 101 Larry Holmes Drive, 4th Floor, Easton, PA
18042. If the appellant fails to appear for the hearing, the court will dismiss this appeal with
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page
Page65of
of18
7

July 28, 2016

prejudice.]
The COMPLAINTANT received a call from a male who directed the COMPLAINTANT to attend
the HEARING on July 28, 2016 WHICH IS PURELEY MALICIOUS AS IT CANNOT BE
INTPRETED

FROM

THE

ORDER

THAT

ATTENDANCE

IS

REQUIRED

SINCE

THE

COMPLAINTANT FILED THE SHOW CAUSE BRIEF THE DAY AFTER THE ORDER WAS
RECORDED.

THE COMPLAINTANT FILED THE SHOW CAUS BRIEF ELECTRONICALLY AS

REQUIRED.

THE COMPLAINTANT IS ALLEGING THAT THE COURTS WISH TO PUT THE

COMPLAINTAINT IN HARMS WAY AND HIS LIFE AT RISK!

II) ALL OTHER JUDICIAL CLERKS, JUDGES, AND STAFF

1. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE
2. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO ABUSE OF PROCESS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT
BY CREATING AN ENVIRONMENT THAT CALL INTO QUESTION THE CREDIBILITY OF
THE COMPLAINTANT AND SUPPORTS THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF MENTAL ILLNESS
AND CRIMINALITY OF THE COMPLAINTANT.

3. VIOLATIONS OF RICO STATUTES

4. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CONSPRIACY TO VIOLATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
AND ANTI-TRUST VIOLATIONS.
The computer hacking is well documented this entire conspiracy against the
APPELLANT can be reviewed by Your Honor by visiting the following document:
CATERBONE v. the United States of America, et.al., COMPLAINT July 20, 2016 Ver 3.0
THE COMPLAINTAINT IS TODAY TRAVELING TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT TO OBTAIN
THE NEW CASE NO. FOR THE FOLLOWING:
- https://www.scribd.com/document/318998718/CATERBONE-v-the-United-States-ofAmerica-et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-ver-3-0-Full-With-Forms-July-22-2016

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page
Page76of
of18
7

July 28, 2016

DATE: July 28, 2016

Respectfully,

___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400
and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016;
Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349,
CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page
Page87of
of18
7

July 28, 2016

CHAPTER
DIVIDER

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se

Page 9 of 18

July 28, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163

IN THE UNITED STATES U.S. DISTRICT COURT

FOR EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: STANLEY JOSEPH CATERBONE
Movant

:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-mc-49

BANKRUPTCY NO. 16-10517

SHOW CUASE BRIEF TO ORDER DATED JULY 20, 2016

by The Honorable Edward G. Smith
AND NOW, on this 21TH

day of July, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED

MEDIA GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT re
SHOW CUASE BRIEF TO ORDER DATED JULY 20, 2016 in response to the ORDER of July
20, 2016 by the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith.
Dated July 21, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page10
1 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

SHOW CAUSE BRIEF

On April 14, 2016 the Clerk of Court issued an order transferring this case from The
Honorable Anita J. Brody, of the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to
The Honorable Edward G. Smith of the Larry Holmes Federal Courthouse in Easton Pennsylvania.
The order is item no. 2 in this case' court docket sheet. See Exhibit No. 1. It should be noted
that The Honorable Judge Anita Brody had heard similar appeals for the APPELANT'S
previous Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 05-23059.

On July 6, 2016 the APPELLANT filed a MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE and requested
that the Hearing of July 19, 2016 be moved to either the Federal Bankruptcy Court in Reading,
Pennsylvania or the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Motion reads:
AND NOW, on this 5TH day of July, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA
GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION FOR CHANGE OF
VENUE TO PHILADELPHIA for the HEARING of July 19, 2016, according to ORDER of
June 28, 2016 by the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith. The Allentown Courthouse is an
inconvenience and would place an undo hardship on the APPELLANT.

Given that the

APPELLANT must visit the Philadelphia Courthouse to copy dockets due to the fact that the
APPELLANT'S Pacer Account has been maliciously and erroneously closed due to computer
hackers,

it

would

appear

that

this

MOTION

FOR

CHANGE

OF

VENUE

TO

PHILADELPHIA should be granted.

On July 19, 2016 the APPELLANT filed an EXHIBIT in the Philadelphia Federal Courthouse which
read the following:
AND NOW, on this 19TH day of July, 2016, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED
MEDIA GROUP, APPELLANTS, appearing pro se, do hereby file this MOTION TO FILE
EXHIBIT re Press Release and Executive Summary re CATERBONE v. the United
States of America, et.al., July 16, 2016 in response to the ORDER of June 28, 2016 by
the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith. It is now 6:57pm on Monday, July 18, 2016
and the computer hackers WOULD NOT allow mapquest on my computer find the
Larry Holmes Building in Easton, PA. I have no choice but to file this EXHIBIT in
U.S. District Court in Philadelphia on July 19, 2016.
On July 19, 2016 the APPELLANT called the Honorable Judge Edward G. Smith's Clerk and
notified the clerk that on the morning of July 19, 2016, the day of the HEARING, the APPELLANT
had first traveled to the vicinity of Norristown, Pennsylvania, in order to file the Court of Common
Pleas of Montgomery County Case No. CP-46-CR-0008423-2015 REQUEST FOR APPEARANCE re
Kathleen Kane Amicus in Support of Motion to DISMISS Charges July 20, 2016 in the

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page11
2 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

Montgomery County Courthouse. Again, like before the APPELLANT'S GPS mapping system on his
Samsung 6S smartphone was again compromised by a computer hacker that left the APPELLANT
driving around in circles for nearly 2 hours. In addition upon trying to locate the address of the
Montgomery County Courthouse, the address changed from Norristown to Willow Grove. Needless
to say the APPELLANT never did file the Amicus. It will be filed today. In addition the APPELLANT
is recorded as being the AMICUS in Superior Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 for Pennsylvania
Attorney General Kathleen Kane.
The APPELLANT is alleging judicial misconduct by the Clerk of Court for
maliciously and purposefully inconveniencing the APPELLLANT in an effort to have the
APPELLANT miss the court hearing of July 19, 2016 in an effort to have this case
dismissed and sanctions imposed. The traveling time is approximately and additional
one hour and most importantly is unfamiliar territory making the computer hacking all
that much more devastating to the APPELLANT.
The computer hacking is well documented this entire conspiracy against the
APPELLANT can be reviewed by Your Honor by visiting the following document:
CATERBONE

v. the United States of America, et.al., COMPLAINT July 20, 2016 Ver 2.0 -

https://www.scribd.com/document/318862497/CATERBONE-v-the-United-States-ofAmerica-Et-al-COMPLAINT-July-20-2016-Ver-2-0-Full
Dated July 21, 2016
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania

1250 Fremont Street

Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-669-2163
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400
and 16-1149
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-1149;15-3400; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559; 052288; 06-4650, 08-02982
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016
Superior Court of Pennsylvania AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016;
Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349,
CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page12
3 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

Case 2:16-mc-00049-EGS Document 17 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: STANLEY JOSEPH CATERBONE,
Appellant.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-mc-49

BANKRUPTCY NO. 16-10517

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2016, the appellant having filed an application for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis in connection with this purported bankruptcy appeal; and the
court having entered an order on June 28, 2016, which, inter alia, scheduled a hearing on the
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for July 19, 2016 (Doc. No. 7); and the court
having denied the appellants request to change the venue of the hearing (Doc. Nos. 9, 10); and
the court having reiterated that the appellant must appear in Easton for the hearing, see Order,
Doc. No. 10; and the appellant nonetheless having failed to appear for the hearing because he
claims that the computer hackers WOULD NOT allow mapquest on [his] computer [to]
find the Larry Holmes Building in Easton, PA, see Motion to File Exhibit re Press Release
and Executive Summary re Caterbone v. the United States of America, et[] al., July 16, 2016 at
1, Doc. No. 15; 1 accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

The appellant shall SHOW CAUSE why this court should not impose sanctions

for his failure to appear for the hearing on July 19, 2016;
2.

The appellant shall file any written response with the court electronically by no

later than July 27, 2016;

The appellant included this assertion despite his attempt to change venue and his call to the undersigneds civil
deputy only a few days prior to the hearing in which he stated that he would not be appearing in Easton for the
hearing unless the court changed the location to Philadelphia.

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page13
4 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

Case 2:16-mc-00049-EGS Document 17 Filed 07/20/16 Page 2 of 2

3.

If the appellant fails to respond to the order to show cause, the court will deem

him in favor of dismissing this appeal; and

4.

The court will hold a hearing on the order to show cause on Thursday, July 28,

2016, at 1:00 p.m. at the Holmes Building, 101 Larry Holmes Drive, 4th Floor, Easton, PA
18042. If the appellant fails to appear for the hearing, the court will dismiss this appeal with
prejudice.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward G. Smith

EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

2
16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page14
5 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

EXIBIT

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page15
6 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page16
7 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page17
8 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

16-cv-49
Stan
J. Caterbone,
SHOW CUASE
Pro Se
BRIEF

Page
Page18
9 of 18
9

Thursday July 28,

21, 2016

Track your package or shipment with FedEx Tracking

1 of 1

https://www.fedex.com/apps/fedextrack/?action=track&tracknumbers=7...

My Profile

Shipping

Tracking

Manage

Learn

Support

Locations

English

FedEx Office

Login

IMPORTANT!
RNC and DNC may cause delays and disruptions in the Cleveland and Philadelphia metro areas. Learn More

FedEx Tracking
783689613816
Ship date:

Actual delivery:

Thu 7/28/2016

Fri 7/29/2016 2:35 pm

Delivered

Lancaster, PA US

Philadelphia, PA US

Signed for by: BBERGEY

Travel History
Date/Time

Activity

Location

7/29/2016 - Friday

2:35 pm

Delivered

Philadelphia, PA

6:51 am

On FedEx vehicle for delivery

PHILADELPHIA, PA

6:41 am

At local FedEx facility

PHILADELPHIA, PA

4:00 am

Departed FedEx location

LEWISBERRY, PA

12:03 am

Arrived at FedEx location

LEWISBERRY, PA

7/28/2016 - Thursday

9:11 pm

Left FedEx origin facility

EXTON, PA

9:00 pm

Arrived at FedEx location

EXTON, PA

6:00 pm

Picked up

EXTON, PA

2:15 pm

In FedEx possession
Tendered at FedEx location
Shipment information sent to FedEx

MIDDLETOWN, PA

In FedEx possession
Tendered at FedEx location

KING OF PRUSSIA, PA

2:15 pm
2:00 pm

Shipment Facts
Tracking number

783689613816

Service

FedEx Ground

Weight

0.4 lbs / 0.18 kgs

Total pieces

Terms

Shipper

Packaging

Package

Standard
transit

7/29/2016

Customer Focus
New Customer Center
Small Business Center
Service Guide
Customer Support
Company Information
About FedEx
Careers
Investor Relations
Subscribe to FedEx email

FedEx 1995-2016

Featured Services
FedEx Delivery Manager
FedEx SameDay
FedEx Home Delivery
FedEx TechConnect
Healthcare Solutions
Online Retail Solutions
Packaging Services
Ancillary Clearance Services

Companies
FedEx Express
FedEx Ground
FedEx Office
FedEx Freight
FedEx Custom Critical
FedEx Trade Networks
FedEx CrossBorder
FedEx SupplyChain

Follow FedEx

United States - English

Other Resources
FedEx Compatible
Developer Resource Center
FedEx Ship Manager Software
FedEx Mobile
Global Home | Site Map | fedex.com Terms of Use | Security and Privacy

7/29/2016 4:49 PM