Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
10
11
12
13
14
15
The District Court notes that the typical case where a court
voids a second generation interest arbitration provision occurs
when the union insists on its inclusion. The Court correctly
observes that there is no evidence that the union did so here,
meaning that Scheinman may have included it on his own
initiative. However, this has no bearing on our analysis. Even
if the impetus for the provision comes from an arbitrator
rather than a party, the result is the same: the imposition of a
requirement to arbitrate. Unless both parties consent to that
arrangement, it is unenforceable.
16
17