Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2d 805
corpus proceedings in the state courts. For we agree with the district court that
those courts gave fair consideration to the issues raised and the evidence
offered by the relator and reached a logical and satisfactory conclusion thereon.
2
As we have stated, the relator raised one new contention in the district court. It
is that he was deprived of his liberty without due process of law, in violation of
the Fourteenth Amendment, in that the Court of Common Pleas of Centre
County denied his request for the appointment of counsel to assist him in
presenting his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. It appears to be true that the
Court of Common Pleas did decline to appoint counsel to prosecute the relator's
petition for the writ although that court did appoint counsel to prosecute his
appeal to the Superior Court. We are satisfied, however, that this refusal to
appoint counsel did not amount to a denial of a constitutional right which would
entitle the relator to relief on habeas corpus.
Although the Supreme Court has held that the Fourteenth Amendment requires
a state to provide counsel for a defendant accused of crime in cases where
unfairness would otherwise result,1 it has never been held that the Fourteenth
Amendment requires that a state must provide counsel for a prisoner who seeks
through habeas corpus to secure his release from confinement under a prior
judgment in a criminal proceeding. On the contrary it is settled that a habeas
corpus proceeding is not a criminal proceeding2 and that the constitutional
guarantee of the right of counsel for one's defense accordingly does not apply to
it.3
Betts v. Brady, 1942, 316 U.S. 455, 471-472, 62 S.Ct. 1252, 86 L.Ed. 1595;
Foster v. Illinois, 1947, 332 U.S. 134, 136-137, 67 S.Ct . 1716, 91 L.Ed. 1955;
Wade v. Mayo, 1948, 334 U.S. 672, 684, 68 S.Ct. 1270, 92 L.Ed. 1647
Ex parte Tom Tong, 1883, 108 U.S. 556, 2 S.Ct. 871, 27 L.Ed. 826;
Commonwealth ex rel. Master v. Baldi, 1950, 166 Pa.Super. 413, 72 A.2d 150
Brown v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 1937, 91 F.2d 370, 372, certiorari denied 302 U.S.
728, 58 S.Ct. 58, 82 L.Ed. 563; Dorsey v. Gill, 80 U . S.App.D.C. 9, 148 F.2d
857, 877, certiorari denied 325 U.S. 890, 65 S.Ct. 1580, 89 L.Ed. 2003; People
ex rel. Ross v. Ragen, 1945, 391 Ill. 419, 63 N.E.2d 874, 162 A.L.R. 920 and
note, certiorari denied Ross v. Ragen, 327 U.S. 801, 66 S.Ct. 900, 900 L.Ed.
1026; Commonwealth ex rel. Johnson v. Burke, 1953, 173 Pa.Super. 105, 107,
93 A.2d 876, 877