ARE THE PLANCK UNITS MISTAKEN?

The cause of the BB is proposed

By: Ramon Garza Wilmot

August 10, 2016
Monterrey N.L. Mxico
PREFACE.
It is the intention of this document, to show some mistakes I see in what is call the Planck units,
mainly in what is call the Planck time. I found that this Planck time as it is understood, is not a
time, but a frequency. Yet, its value indeed has a meaning as epoch but with different
characteristics. Planck units are important because they are related with the properties of the
universe as a whole as will show. I am Showing equations like the ones of Planck but for the
universe, by mean of another parameter very much alike Planck constant.
It is also included my explanation for the cause of the BB and also the origin of the Cosmic
Background Radiation and the cause of matter. Explaining that matter it still being created and
how is created and how much is created.

1 .- Although here I'm not getting into details of the subject, I found as a cause of the existence
of both, the mass of the universe and the microwave cosmic background , the principle of
uncertainty from Max Planck. These will be analyzed at the end of this subject of the Planck
Units.
This is a simple analysis of the relationships between different physical and universal constants,
which lets us glimpse the properties of the universe as a whole from these, and especially its
relation to what has been called Planck units, especially with the mass and the Planck time.
In order to understand better what here is exposed, I recommend the reading of another
analysis of mine on the Internet named The Birth of a Universe on which this paper could be
taken as the second part.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282575292_BIRTH_OF_A_UNIVERSE
https://es.scribd.com/document/283737792/Birth-of-a-Universe
The Planck units are by me derived, from what I call "parameters" of gravitational and electrical
forces from which Planck units are very easy to get.
Algebraic basics and some miscellaneous classical and quantum physics will be sufficient to
achieve the objective of this writing.
I believe that the fundamental element that has led me to these results has been the
determination of the Hubble constant that put slightly together gravity with quantum physics in a
remarkably simple way. In fact the result is that the Hubble constant (parameter) Ho is simply
identified as a frequency of gravitational force whose inverse is the age of the universe. And to
calculate it, I had to use the masses of the proton and the electron, the basic unit of electric
charge, Planck's constant and the Newton constant of gravitation.
This paper is perhaps shorter than others I have written, is almost a dimensional analysis of the
characteristics of the universe and that despite their simplicity, have allowed me to get some
notable results of its global properties, but mainly to be able to calculate with high precision the
temperature of the cosmic background radiation and explain the meaning of the so-called
Planck units. Such as mass, time, temperature, etc of Planck and its relations to the properties
of the proton and electron.
I must add that this analysis leads me much further, farther back in a time of what has been
called Planck time. As we shall see, this "time" of Planck, DOES NOT represents a time, but
only the inverse of the frequency of Planck. This is the reason of why I use the term "time" to
refer to real time and to differentiate it from Plancks.

I went far back, as I said, than the Planck time, until the actual time was worth.
1.6878666729E-99 seconds.
I define it as the time when the photon No 1 that will carry all the thermal energy in the cosmic
background radiation, (today and always) emerged, whose value arises from the equation:
Et = h / t = 3.7746611986E+72 ergs
This energy is the result of a calculation from the CBT and the size of the universe. The CBT
(cosmic background temperature is also calculated from physical constants of nature.
These constants are:
The Newton gravitational constant.
The Plancks constant.
The Boltzmanns constant.
The speed of light
And with the help of the known masses and electric charges of the proton and the electron,
which I do not include as constants, I have been able to build this analysis.
This simple equation above shows the origin of cosmic radiation. My result shown that the CMB
does not come from the annihilation of particles and antiparticles as standard theories say.
I feel pretty sure about this result because I calculated the actual CMB temperature in such a
close value as the actual measurements of it as to think it is just by chance.
The best measured value is : 2.72548 0.002 K (NRAO)
That is a range going from 2.72748 to 2.72348
Now. The calculated T is depending great deal from G, which having a value of G = 6.693e-8
0.034e-8 . or from 6.7270000000E-08 to 6.6590000000E-08
These ranges makes my calculation also to vary from:
T = 2.7270164734E+00 to 2.7409049035E+00
Which is inside the range of measurement.
and not taking on count the ranges for the other constants as h, m, r
The differences between the measured valued and mine could be because the errors in actual
measurements of this temperature, or because some of this radiation was absorbed by
interstellar media. Or because the physics constants I used are not exactly, mainly G.
The results also show a constant cosmic background energy, which density varies with the
volume of the universe in such a way that the corresponding equation is:
T act = Tp x (Rp/ Ract)^(3/4)
Where Tp is the Planck temperature, Rp the Planck length (of the universe at that time)
Note: Both, Tp and Rp are the ones from my calculations taking h instead of ()
But, in general, the product K2 = T^4.t^3 is constant through the all history of the universe,
even before the Planck epoch. (it is taken as valid that C = R/t, being t the epoch)
So it can be known the temperature of the CMB at any time. Of course, I know what is the value
of K2 since I know the temperature and the epoch today.
Anyway, this radiation comes from nothing more and nothing less than a single quantum leap,
creator of the first super energetic photon, from which every other else photon came to be. This
also means that this phenomenon is unique in the space and time, which once created, does
not support another jump of this light type. For this reason, I think it is no longer possible to
create today stable real photons according to the uncertainty principle.
What it is happening, as seen in the results, is that this initial photon is split on "children"
photons and so on, with the characteristic that each of the "children" photon is becoming less
energetic than the "father" photon.
I will show, that matter is also created by the Plancks uncertainty principle beginning from
Placks mass, as the initial value of the universe mass creating the same amount of mass each
time of Planck, until by the time that has pass since then, counts for all the actual mass of the
universe. All of these will be shown with its values on the calculation of Excel tables I attach to
this paper.

Taken from: Wikipedia

+
}*

These equations (mine) also accounts for the temperature of cosmic radiation for any time of
the existence of the universe, and of course also on the current time.
I define the Planck epoch, not as the "Planck time" but at the time when the parameter of
gravitational force had a unitary value.
All these data can be derived from the equations of the section defining the parameters
depending on the time and especially for the Planck epoch, obtained with just making = 1 (as
I will explain here after)
I start exposing what is known today about the so-called Planck epoch and how we can get
these same values without making assumptions that this one.
For all this, I have to start exposing what I think are physical constants in the sense of its
invariance on time, to distinguish them from those that change with it.
The really constants, are not properties of matter but in truth, only conversion factors. Among
which the others are properties of the matter.
Seen this way, I list the invariable physical constants:
The speed of light "c" which relates the ratio between mass and energy.
Gravitational constant "G" which relates to the mass with the force of gravity.
Planck's constant "h" relating to energy with the frequency and time.
The Boltzman constant "K" that relates the heat energy with temperature.
Note that I have not included as constant, values such as the proton mass mp, the electron
mass me and the fundamental electric charge "q". Although if I have taken these values as
characteristic of the present age (about 13,600 million years after the Big Bang.
I also clarified, that the results are based on the cgs system, which basic units are the
centimeter, gram and second. The unit of the electric charge is the electron or electrostatic
charge unit. The temperature is displayed in degrees Kelvin or absolute.
And to end this prologue, also clarified that here assumed that the universe is three
dimensionally spherical, as I have used for it a volume 4/3R^3
2.- Planck units or natural units are a unit system first proposed in 1899 by Max Planck. The
system measures several of the fundamental magnitudes of the universe: time, length, mass,
electric charge and temperature. The system is defined by these five universal physical
constants of the table take the value 1 when equations and calculations are expressed in such a
system.
Using this system brings several advantages. The first and most obvious is that it simplifies the
structure of physical equations because it eliminates the constants of proportionality and makes
the results of the equations not depending on the value of the constant.
Moreover, they can easily compare the magnitudes of different units. For example, two protons
are repulsed between them because the electromagnetic repulsion is much stronger than the
gravitational attraction them. This can be understand knowing that protons are equal on its
natural unit charges, but its mass is much smaller than the natural unit of charge.
It also avoids many problems of rounding, especially with computers. However, they have the
disadvantage that on its use is more difficult to realize dimensional errors. They are popular in
the research area of general relativity and quantum gravity.
The Planck units are often referred to jokingly by physicists as "units of God", because it
eliminates any arbitrariness anthropocentric system of units.
Note: here the reference to such websites ends.
In particular, I see no reason for Planck to use its "reduced" constant () instead of the original
(h), I prefer h because all the calculations are in cycles per sec, or CPS and the main reason for
this is my calculation of the Hubble constant (parameter) as the reciprocal of a period T (not
temperature) by using h instead of and also because I think nature prefers cycles and not
radians. As a result of this, H has units of frequency in cps and its reciprocal T has seconds per
cycle units.
So here, my recalculation using Planck units with h with a change in the temperature
calculation, as will be seen. This change in the temperature calculation is because Wien's law
states that the temperature at maximum emission is defined as: T = b/ where b is the constant

of Wien equal hC/zK and not hC/K (without the z factor) defined as the solution to the equation
zez/(ez - 1) - 5 = 0 and having a value of:
Z = 4.96511423174
In addition, for reasons that this time I will not explain ,I will make the equation:
Tp = 2.mp.C^2/ zK

(2-1)

Is also equal to :
Tp = mfp.C^2/Zk
Since the mass- energy of the photons at Planck epoch was two times the Planck mass .
Then, the results of these changes will be so:
Lp = h / c = G / c ^ 2 = 4.0512837382E-33 cm
= (h c / G) ^ (1/2) = 5.4556017313E-05 grams
p = h / C = (h G / c ^ 3) ^ (1/2) = 4.0512837382E-33 cm
fp = c / p = (c ^ 5 / h G) ^ (1/2) = 7.3999373377E+42 cps
tp = 1 / fp = (h G / c ^ 5) ^ (1/2) = 1.3513627945E-43 seg
ep = h fp = (h c ^ 5 / G) ^ (/ 2) = 4.9032503091E+16 erg
Tp = (2.h.C ^ 5 / G K^ 2.z ^ 2) ^ (1/2) = 1.4305452366E+32 oK
We can add others, as:
Fp = ep / p = C^4 /G = 1.2102954584E+49 dyne
Planck force
Pp = C ^ 5 / G = 3.6283745038E+59 erg-sec
Planck power
p = /k.lp^3 = C^5 / k.h.G^2 = 1.9587367286E+92 gm / cm3
Planck density
Prp = Fp /4 (p)^2 = C^7 /4.h.G^2 = 5.8680825953E+112 barias Planck pressure
Note that the power and the Planck force, do not depend on Planck's constant.
It is important to say that most of these calculations are depending of the G value, which it is not
known with high precision. And if I may dare to do it, if I took the actual CMT as real. If that is
so, from (2-1) G would take a value of : G = 6.5547E-08 cm^3/gm.sec^2 (using the actual
measured temperature) versus 6.67384E-8 about 1.78 % lower than the accepted value today.
3. - Basic calculations of the properties of protons and electrons.
Now I proceed to analyze and get the Planck units without the need of reducing to 1 the five
basic units he used. To do this, I use the system cgs units (centimeter, gram, second) and the
electrostatic unit base charge (electron)
The notation A^n means that A (the magnitude A) is raised to the "n" power.
We will see how are related Planck units with the general properties of the universe, such as the
temperature of cosmic microwave background, the mass, the "radius" of the universe and more.
And how it explains the amount of mass of the universe.
A. Einstein deduced from the photoelectric effect that light exists in packets of energy called
"quanta" in which the energy carried by these "quanta" is defined as a function of the frequency
of light and the Plancks constant. This energy can be expressed in two similar ways:
E = .w where = h/2
h is Planck's constant and w is the angular frequency of the light in
radians per second.
E can also be expressed as:
E = h.f being in this case the frequency f of light in cycles per second or Hertz
Of course, w = 2 f and h is expressed in ergs-sec/cicle.
The photon has no rest mass, however, as it has an energy, is possible to attribute to it a
"mass" such that:
Ef = mf.c^2 = h.f. mf = hf/c^2
Also, the frequency and the speed of light are related by c = f. and consequently:
= h /mf.c
The same equation = h/m.C is used to define the wavelength of a quantum particles such as
the electron and the proton, then defined as Compton wavelength of the particle. And so:

 = h /m.C

(3-1)

Then we have:
+ = h /mp.c (3-2)
- = h /me.c
(3-3)
As Compton wavelengths of the proton and the electron respectively, and me and mp are the
masses of each of the two particles at any time.
Now, we multiply each equations (3-2) and (3-3)
+ = h/mp.c X - = h / me.c
+ - = h^2 / (mp X me) /c^2
Let us now make that : ^2 = + X and m^2 = mp X me
as result we have a
wavelength that I call "mason wavelength" being the mass of this "mason" the square root of the
product mp x me:
= h / m c (3-4)
I define here that the mason m I think is not a real particle. But a particle, (lets say) assistant,
for calculations, and used to express some important properties of the universe.
From (2-4) we obtain other quantities derived very simple, all for the mason:
f = c / (3-5)

E = m.c^2 (3-6)

E = f. h

(3-7)

As its seen, they are equal as defined before, but only at this time are referred to mason in this
case.
Let us now get into other definitions, as the so-called "classical radius" of the electron. This is
defined by:
-q^2/r = me.C^2 or the proton
+q^2 /r = mp.C^2
and:
-r = - q^2 /me.c^2 (3-8)

+ r = +q^2 / mp.c.^2

(3-9)

As we did with the wavelength, lets multiply both radius by each other and get r^2 = +r X rr = q^2 /m.C^2 (3-10)
In this case we use q^2 instead of q + X q- since the magnitude of the electric charges of the
proton and the electron are the same.
Now, we divide the equation (3-4) with (3-10) and obtain:
(h/m.C)/(q^2/m.C^2) = h.C / q ^ 2
This magnitude, h.C/q^2 receives an special name: "reciprocal of the fine structure constant".
I will not stop here to explain what this means, except that it is a constant that for these
purposes defines the magnitude of the electric force, which is equal for both the proton and the
electron because they have the same value of charge. In reality, the fine structure constant is
defined not with h but with . The difference is due to reasons not important for this article. In
this case, the reason I call it parameter of electrical force as we shall see, is because is not
really constant. So that:
@ = h.C/q^2

(3-11)

The value of this @ is approximately 861 (an approach) and the reciprocal of the fine-structure
constant is @ 2 pi / 861 1/137
So I get:
= h/m.c = h.c / m.c^2 = h.c.r /q^2 = @ r
(3-12)
Being "r" the classic mason "radius", a length which is a key to what is presented here.
The electrostatic energy between a proton and an electron at a distance r (mason classic
radius) is:
Ee = (q1 x q2) / r

q1 and q2 are the proton and the electron charges.

As q1.q2 = q^2
Then
Ee = q^2 / r
But
q^2 / r = m.C^2 = h f
Then the frequency "f" electric for mason is:
f = q^2 /r.h
(3-13)
4. - The gravity parameter.
Now we enter into the gravitational energy between a proton and an electron at the same
distance "r" from the previous item, to compare the magnitude of the electric force against
gravitational one. This will be defined by:
Eg = G.(m +) x (m-)/r = G. m^2 / r
Where m^2 = (m +) x (m-) or
m^2 = mp. me
And if Eg = F x h where F is the gravitational frequency then:
F = G.m^2 / h.r

(4-1)

(4-2)

As in the case of the electric charge, the Compton wavelength is equal as it depends on the
mass in both cases, but here, the called gravitational force parameter has another value that
is:
+ = h.C / Gmp^2 and - = h.C / Gme^2 which brings us to multiply each to:
= h.C / Gm^2

(4-3)

Now we divide the equation (4-3) by the (3-11) to obtain a "constant" that links together the
magnitude of the gravitational forces with the electrical one, whose terms are:
S = q^2 / G.m^2 = /@ = 2.2687362533E+39 (4-4)
Note that the magnitudes of the parameters of the forces are inversely proportional to the
magnitudes of the forces and so, although is today S times greater than the electrical force, is
S times weaker.
Now, I list the base values and derivatives of these numbers:
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
a) Fundamental:
elect charge. q = 4.8032046730E-10 ue
proton mass = 1.6726218980E-24 gm
electron mass = 9.10938356 28 gm
Planck's constant h = 6.62606957 e-27 erg-sec
speed of light in vacuum C = 2.99792458e + 10 cm / sec
Boltzmann constant K = 1.3806485200E-16
erg / Kelv
gravitational constant G = 6.6740800000E-08 erg-cm /gm^2
b) Deducted:
const. electric force @ = 8.6102257636E+02
const. gravitational force = 1.9534331339E+42
mason radius
r = 6.5762360983E-15 cm
mason long.wave = 5.6622877481E-12 cm
mason frequency
f = 5.2945465038E+21 cps
grav radius. mason rg = 2.8986340253E-54 cm
5.- Planck units and new calculation method.
Suppose we accept a priori the basic ideas of the Big Bang and let us assume that in the distant
past, fundamental forces were unified (at least the electromagnetic and gravitational). Since the
difference between the magnitudes of these is now very large, (as we have seen between and

@), we conclude that, in the past and because of this unification, the magnitudes of the
parameters were lower than today. That is for example tending to be equal to @.
For me, it is clear that if there was in the past a unification of forces, the force should be
smaller, as it depends on h, C, G and m. I conclude that some of these terms are not constant.
Since I have taken h, C and G as constant as they are only factors of conversion and not
intrinsic properties, I take "m" as the variable with time.
Taking precisely that there was a time when 1 = 1 and by the definition of I arrived to:
G m1^2 = hc
Where m1 is the mass of mason when = 1
So:
m1 = (hc/G)^(1/2) = (the Planck mass)
(5-1)
This means that the mass of Planck has this value because = 1 and the value of , was
indeed, the mass of the mason at the time.
I must noted that although or m1 is the square root of (hc/G), this does not necessarily mean
that there is a negative as there is no mass m negative coming from (mp x me)^(1/2). And if
^2 = + X it could be inferred that ^2 is the product of the masses of the proton and
electron at that time (but not yet defined by me)
Note: This is not easy to solve, because we dont know if the mp to me ratio is valid at the
epoch of Planck. I read somewhere in the Internet that there are confidence among the
scientific community, that at least the proton to electron ratio has no change with time. This
would be of great help to know the exact (up to the tenth or twelve decimal) the mass values of
them.
Note that except for the use of h instead of , = m1 is equal to the value of Planck mass but
in other system units. The same applies to the other units of Planck.
Now we see how can be obtained the values of Planck units without making unitary the 5 used
by him. And since ^ 2 = hc/G = .m^2
then:
= ^(1/2) .m (5-2)
With this in mind, the data on the shown Tables are easily deduced with just replacing h by
I repeat: is the mass of a mason with a current value of m = (mp *me)^(1/2) as 1 = 1.
So:
lp is the Compton wavelength of
fp is the Compton frequency of
ep is the energy of
etc etc.
Here it is important to note that the Planck time (as defined by other people) is NOT a time, is
just the reciprocal of the Compton frequency of the Planck mass. I say then that mason is not
constant. It has declined since at the time of Planck to "m" today. And therefore also the
masses of the electron and proton are not constant.
One of the consequences of the values obtained for the Planck length is that it acquires the
same value with different ways of calculation. Self-evident and all these values were derived
from = 1 and the definitions of Compton.
It is also relevant that as well as values obtained for the mass, frequency, length etc. of Planck,
the values for the electrical force are obtained by using the same method, that is making @ = 1
I must say that the values of 1 for and @ were not simultaneous on time. This is also shown
on the attached table.
6. - The Hubble parameter.
Consider the equation (4-2) with values:
F = 2.3336985496E-18 cps
(6-1)
To which corresponds a wave length of L = c / F = 1.2846237491E+28 cm
Also an energy E = F h = 1.5463250042E-44 ergs
(6-2)
And a mass of mg = E / c^2 = 1.7205186026E-65 grams (6-3)
It would be noted that this last mass is the result of gravitational energy between proton and
electron and possibly that of a particle of virtual exchange whose lifetime is the age of the
universe and whose range is the Compton wavelength equal to the radius of the universe. In
fact, calculating g we get :

g = h /(mg.c) = 1.2846237491E+28 cm
This last mass (6-3) may be the Graviton. Can we say that the radius of the universe is the
scope of this virtual particle?.
The interesting thing about the equation (6-1) of this section is that transformed into kilometers
per second per megaparsec, it corresponds to the value of the Hubble constant current
measured, that is:
1 megaparsec = 3.08567758E + 24 cm
1 km / sec / 1 megaparsec = 100000 / 3.08567758 E + 24 sec ^ (- 1) = 3.24077929E-20 sec.
With 3 simple rule simply we get: 2.3336144604E-18 s ^ (- 1) = 72.010412952
km/sec/
megaparsec.
Hubble constant H = 2.3336985496E-18 cps
H = 72.010412952 km/sec/megaparsec
Where we could get the "age" of the current universe as: = 1 / H (a period in fact)
365.256 in 363 years 004 days = 13,587.784073 million of years.
More or less about 13.588 million years, making clear that when I speak of the moment, it will
defined as "time", as time elapsed since the BB. And the wavelength corresponds to the
"radius" of the universe R = 1.2846237491E+28 cm
I could not explain why the equation (6 -1) is the Hubble constant. But I can say that its value
coincides admirably well with the most recently measured value of it. Perhaps what actually
represents the equation is that the mass m^2 = (mp x me) varies inversely with time, and
indeed, the Hubble constant is the reciprocal of the current age of the universe.
Another automatic implication of these, is that the universe is expanding at the speed of light at
all times, because light is expanding at C speed (but maybe matter dont).(we will also see
these on the table)
Then, when modern cosmology speaks of Planck time, it is absolutely wrong because that
"time" is not a time, is just the reciprocal of the Planck frequency that is not the same. And the
Planck mass, does indeed represent the mass of the universe, but in a previous moment as we
shall se. Instead, when = 1 and m = the real time follows from the equation (4-2)
F = G. ^2/hr by just using instead m and letting the other terms constant, and this leads to
the Planck epoch which was: 2.1935962439E-25 seconds. If we, indeed, which to go back to as
small time as the Planck time or, 1.3513627945E-43 sec. The calculated mass of the universe
at that time had the following value:
6.9508037462E+04 grams
On the table I attach, we will see that this last mass was not a matter mass (made of electrons
and protons) but the mass of a particle I called mx
But I advance too, for these details, making use of my essay Birth of a Universe on
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ramon_Garza_Wilmot
7. Without going into details, I describe here some of the properties of the universe (at least
observable) by means of simple equations to obtain:
R=C/H
radius of the universe
= H ^ 2 / G.k
density of the universe k = 4 / 3
M = C ^ 3 / GH
mass of the universe
E = M.C ^ 2
energy of the universe
A = H.C
acceleration of the universe
F = M.A
force in the universe
Pr = F / a = M.A / 4R^2
pressure of the universe
P = EH
power of universe
T = M.C^2/zK
equivalent temperature of the universe

The first thing to note here is that if H is a variable, so are R, , M, E, A. This, I believe is
relevant, because it sends away the idea of a universe with constant mass, and not only that, it
also tells us that this mass did not exist in the BB, but has being growing as time passed.
Now, I will change some of the above equations by just the next constants: C, G. H is the
variable parameter. Let's see:
R=C/H
radius of the universe
= H^2 / G.k
density of the universe k = 4 / 3
M = C^3 / GH
mass of the universe
E = M.C ^ 2 = (C^3/GH).C^2 = C^5/G.H
energy of the universe
A = H.C
acceleration of the universe
F = M.A = (C^3/GH). H.C = C^4/G.
force of the universe
Pr = F / a = F / 4R^2 = C^4/G/4R^2 = pressure of the universe
P = EH
power of universe
T = M.C^2/zK
Note that as with the Planck units or force or power, depends just of C and G.
Now, the Planck length expressed as:
p^2 = h.G/C^3
From this previous equation, it could be used in a similar way to describe the properties of the
universe provided that:
R^2 = C^2/H^2 = U.G /C^3 being now "U" a parameter that can be calculated as:
U = (C^5/H^2.G)
H^2 = (C^5/G.U)

(7-1)
(7-2)

With the same units as the Planck constant but with a value of:
U = 6.6622755949E+94 erg-sec
With a magnitude of 1.0054641069E+121 times greater than the Plancks constant.
Number equal to the ratio (t/tp)^2
(actual to Planck time, squared)
Using a "U" in the equations of Planck units, we found that:
R = C/H
lenght
R^2 = U.G/C^3
Ti = 1/H
time
Ti^2 = 1/H^2 = R^2/C^2 = U.G/C^5
M = C^3/GH
mass
M^2 = C^6/G^2.H^2 = (C^6/G^2)/ C^5/GU = (U.C/G)
T = 2.m.C^2/(zK^(1/4)) = Tp/ ^(3/4)
Note: = h.C/G.m^2
T = 2.(h.C^5/G)^(1/2)/ (^(3/4))/zK

very easy to deduce

of the CMB

E = M. C^2
energy
E^2 = M^2.C^4 = (U.C/G).C^4 = U.C^5/G
F = C^4/G

force independent from h o U

P = E.H
power
P^2 = E^2.H^2 = (U.C^5/G). C^5/G.U = C^10/G^2
P = C^5/G
= H^2/Gk

density

 = (C^5/G.U)/Gk = C^5/U.G^2.k
Pr = (H.C)^2/4G
pressure
Pr = (C^5/G.U).C^2/4G = C^7/4G^2.U
As shown, all the properties of the universe today are derived from the same equations of
Planck units using "U" instead of "h".
It is noted that as "U" depends on H, U is not constant as "h" and knowing this, we can
determine the time when U = h.
We know by (7-1) with:
U = h = (C^5/H^2.G) and calculate H from here and the time accordingly, then:
H^2 = C^5/ h.G
T^2 = h.G/ C^5

which is precisely Planck frequency (in cps)

which is the so-called "time" of Planck (which is not time, but a period)

That is: When the real time had the same value as the "time" (frequency) of Planck, the mass of
the universe was the size of the Planck mass, the radius of the universe was the size of the
Planck length.
A consequence of these is that we can calculate actual epoch, using the Planck time but
replacing h on his equation by U.

I repeat: The mass, length, and all the rest of the units of Planck (except those of the electric
charge), had these magnitudes when the epoch corresponded to the Plank time, but: real
Planck time or epoch was NOT the calculation of Planck, as it has being confused the inverse of
the frequency of Planck with real time when the mass, length, etc., were the Plancks.
Incidentally, the real-time "Planck time" was 2.1935962439E-25 sec obtained from (4-2) using
Planck mass as the mass, and leaving h, r and G without change. Remember that t = 1 / H
8.- About the Planck units for the electromagnetism, the units presented by Wikipedia are all
wrong.
These calculations are based (as for the gravitation) when fine structure constant was equal to
1. This is easy to see when the so call Planck charge squared was equal to 4o. C. making
@ = 1. But, as I said before, this was not simultaneous with = 1. So, it can be mixed one with
the others.
When = 1 @ = 6.1604901006E-19 and q^2 = 3.2244931682E+02 ue. Which was the real
Planck charge at the same time with Planck mass.
Proof of this is in document The Birth of a Universe In that paper I described how to get the
fine structure constant trough time (t) like this:
@^2 = h^2/(G.m^3.t.C)
= @/2 fine structure constant
^2 = @^2/4^2 = h^2/(G.m^3.t.C)/ 4^2
This can be checked using m = (mp. me)^(1/2) and t as the actual epoch (4.2850435853E+17
sec)
It is proper to say, that t is depending of G. an error on G will make an error on t. In other
words, this doesnt mean that is depending on G.
The real dependence come from the fact that : m^2 = h.r/G.t
Anyway, the important thing here is that the Planck units should not include the electric charge,
as indicated by Wikipedia at least at the Planck time.
So, besides these, there is nothing to add here because of these mistakes of either Wikipedia or
some scientist.

9.- The main thing of this paper is to show from where the Cosmic background radiation and
matter came to be. It is important to look details of the attached table and my previous paper to
understand what follows.
a) According with the results of these equations, the energy of the CMB has being constant
since the very beginning. This can be seeing with two important results of them:
- The calculation of the CMB temperature today and the same at the Planck time. This is
because the thermal energy density is depending of the volume of the universe.
- It can be calculated the number of photons at any time, but there is an obvious restriction to
this. This is: it must be just two photons at the BB.
So, all the energy of the CMB (which is constant) came to be at the exact time : E/2 = h/ti
where ti = 4.2531586513E-99 sec. and the temperature at this moment was:
Ti = 2.7531857731E+87 kelvins
There were no mass (protons or electrons) because there cant be fraction of number of
particles. Mass began to exist until the mass of the universe was equal to Planck mass. This
happened at 1.3513627945E-43 seconds (not the inverse of the Planck frequency, which have
the same value, but not the same meaning).
The CMB was so intense in that small volume, than it grow up with the potential of exercise a
large pressure over any matter present. As this happened at the epoch I call tx = Planck time,
then pressure over matter began. Causing the expansion of the universe recently formed. And
as matter was so small, the pressure was very high causing space to grow at speeds above
light speed.
Note: all of these are in the equations and table I attach
So we have as cause of the CMB the Plancks uncertainty principle generating the exact energy
to create no less and no more than two photons. It is the CMB also the reason for the expansion
of the universe, acting against the gravity force which was very small and incapable of
decelerate the expansion.
b) Then, at the time tx, the first mass was created because the same reason. Remember :
Planck energy = .C^2 = h/tx it cant be any other way, since this is the necessary time to
create 1 and only 1 particle of the size of . Expressing the number of particles as function of
Planck mass. From that moment on, every tx is created a mass.
Lets see : the number of tx passed since tx and up today is_
t actual / tx = 3.1709E+60
Multiplying this number by the Planck mass give us 1.7299E+56 grams which is the universe
actual mass. I dont know if all of this mass is actually material mass, atoms mass. But there
exist, maybe as free electrons and protons.
Anyway, the universe is also creating matter by mean of the uncertainty principle, in fact, the
creation rhythm is C^3/G = M.H
Gravity started to growth since tx. Bigger as the universe acquiring mass and size. Great part of
the universe history radiation dominated accelerating the mass against gravity. But at the
moment 1.0403174189E+13 (which very large indeed )
From that moment and up to now, gravity overpass light pressure and deceleration began.
When this happened, the speed for the growing universe was 2^(1/2) C.
Unfortunately (for my idea of a cycling universe, not rejected yet by me) this acceleration even
growing is not enough to stop the universe in the future.
10.- The table.
It has 9 columns for the different important moments on the universe:
a) The BB
column N
b) The unification of @ and
column M
c) Nx equal to 1. this is the real epoch when the very first mass of the universe appear and
equal to Planck mass.
column L
d) N = 1 is the time when the number of masons was 1
column K

e) = 1 the Planck time, when masons acquired a mass equal to , etc.

f) @ = 1 The alfa time, the time when @ = 1 and q^2 = h.C
g) Equilibrium of Force of CMB with Gravity force
h) Expansion velocity equal C
i)
Actual epoch

column J
column I
column H
column G
column F

The upper part for rows down to 21. Are the constants permanent in blue and the values that
will change with time, but necessary for the calculus in light blue.
The rows 18 to 21 are the constants I discover named K1, K2, K3, K4 to know the mass of the
mason (K1), the CMB temperature (K2), the photon mass (K3) and the energy density of the
CMB (K4) all in green.
The down rows in black are the calculations for the subjects as the column E indicates. At the
very low rows, are the values for the light pressure, forces, accelerations and velocities for the
universe.
On the N column which is the BB, I have some difficulties to calculate some of the values
because Excel cant work with exponents above 300. So, some rows are empty. But it is just
matter of taking some time and it can be using the exponents algebra.
Time or epoch is represented by or just by t. in red.
So, I found we can go as far as the 4.2531586513E-99 second as the very first moment of the
universe. With these, maybe, maybe, this time is the minimal possible time, and the universe is
made of 1.0075E+116 intervals of time. In such a manner that 4.2531586513E-99 second is
the real quantum time.
The calculation procedure was using the equations for the actual time column and then copying
it to the others. Except the last one in some of this parts, because the problems with Excel
capabilities. To found the time I wanted, I changed the time in the calculus sheet until I have the
results I wanted in the proper row. As an example, to know when Nx = 1, I changed the time
until Nx = 1. It is not so difficult, because using approximated exponents, the closer or farer you
are from the right moment is easy to see by checking the Nx row. Then, little by little I change
the decimals looking if I am approaching what I want. Sometimes I raise the time and it also
raises the Nx. In other cases is the opposite.
On the publicized paper I wrote the table without equations, but as reference to it I am giving the
wave page where to download the calculus sheet.
Lastly, I want to insist that in order to understand the equations I am using, my Wave page
should be read, otherwise maybe these paper wont be understood.
The table is here with equations. It has being constructed with Excel from Office.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ramon_Garza_Wilmot/publications?sorting=recentlyAdded
THE END

pi
4pi/3
G
K
z
h
c
hc/zK
r
q^2
mp
me
m
H
t
K1 = m^2*t
K2 = T^4*t^3
K3 = mf*t^(3/4)

ACTUAL

Vel exp = C

Force rad = Force g

3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16
4.9651142317E+00
6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16
4.9651142317E+00
6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

K4 = T^4/te

3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16
4.9651142317E+00
6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977729145E-01
6.5762360983E-15
2.3070775131E-19
1.6726218980E-24
9.1093835600E-28
3.9034029282E-26
2.3336985496E-18
4.2850435853E+17
6.5289299779E-34
4.4205551798E+54
3.4973586787E-23
1.3217507250E+14

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54
3.4973586787E-23
1.3217507250E+14

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54
3.4973586787E-23
1.3217507250E+14

millions of years

/tp
/tp*
mx = h/C^2.t
C^5/H^2/G = u
u/h
m

S
q^2
q
l
dm
f
1/f
H
mx= hH/c^2
Nx = mxo/mx
Mx = Nx. Mx
mx.

1.3587784073E+04
4.2850435853E+17
3.1709054021E+60
1.7299197001E+56
1.7205186026E-65
6.6622755949E+94
1.0054641069E+121
3.9034029282E-26
8.6102257636E+02
1.9534331339E+42
2.2687362533E+39
2.3070775131E-19
4.8032046730E-10
5.6622877481E-12
5.1330910423E+07
5.2945465038E+21
1.8887358894E-22
2.3336985496E-18
1.7205186026E-65
1.0074967657E+116
1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48

6.5976497900E-01
2.0806348378E+13
1.5396567422E+56
8.3997539884E+51
3.5433883292E-61
1.5707383181E+86
2.3705428838E+112
5.6017416111E-24
5.9997734261E+00
9.4850401186E+37
1.5808997182E+37
3.3108680663E-17
5.7540143086E-09
3.9455926586E-14
2.1771969769E+16
7.5981603764E+23
1.3161080452E-24
4.8062253974E-14
3.5433883292E-61
4.8919756076E+111
1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48

3.2988248950E-01
1.0403174189E+13
7.6982837110E+55
4.1998769942E+51
7.0867766583E-61
3.9268457953E+85
5.9263572096E+111
7.9220589593E-24
4.2424804752E+00
4.7425200593E+37
1.1178649111E+37
4.6822745226E-17
6.8427147556E-09
2.7899553247E-14
8.7087879077E+16
1.0745421453E+24
9.3062892353E-25
9.6124507948E-14
7.0867766583E-61
2.4459878038E+111
1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48

R
V
M
Dm
E= M C^2
N
Nmp
T
0
R/lo
ffot
mfo=hfo/c^2
efo
te
Et
Mt
rg
lg
mg
mmf/mg
Mt/Mx
Nf
mmf
Tm
Tx
Nfo
Nf/Nfo

1.2846237491E+28
8.8800712258E+84
1.7299197001E+56
1.9480921449E-29
1.5547742893E+77
4.4318245693E+81
3.1709054021E+60
2.7378066323E+00
1.0584286269E-01
1.2137084319E+29
2.8324296073E+11
2.0882079353E-36
1.8767876961E-15
4.2507104983E-13
3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
2.8986340253E-54
1.2846237491E+28
1.7205186026E-65
3.8906922217E+27
2.4228891086E+00
6.2740838942E+88
6.6940083444E-38
8.7763771665E-02
2.2557366829E-29
2.0112350515E+87
3.1195179746E+01

6.2375863222E+23
1.0165724037E+72
8.3997539884E+51
8.2628192130E-21
7.5493223971E+72
1.4994897251E+75
1.5396567422E+56
4.7067627155E+03
6.1566144334E-05
1.0131520156E+28
4.8694369486E+14
3.5899910276E-33
3.2265230277E-12
3.7131257793E+00
3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
4.1598059779E-52
6.2375863222E+23
3.5433883292E-61
3.2477812339E+26
2.4228891086E+00
3.6494805425E+85
1.1508150120E-34
1.5088099797E+02
4.6456638271E-25
1.1698850950E+84
3.1195205052E+01

3.1187931611E+23
1.2707155046E+71
4.1998769942E+51
3.3051276852E-20
3.7746611986E+72
5.3014967646E+74
7.6982837110E+55
7.9157997898E+03
3.6607448442E-05
8.5195589799E+27
8.1893841487E+14
6.0376211718E-33
5.4263432954E-12
2.9705006235E+01
3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
5.8828540308E-52
3.1187931611E+23
7.0867766583E-61
2.7310475971E+26
2.4228891086E+00
2.1699941136E+85
1.9354324364E-34
2.5375058064E+02
9.2913276542E-25
6.9561783933E+83
3.1195205052E+01

Acel g
Force g
Pre g
Pow g
G.M^2/R^2
M/R
Pre rad
Force rad
Acel rad
Force rad/Force
g

6.9962522441E-08
1.2102954584E+49
5.8361930129E-09
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
1.4169034994E-13
2.9383398846E+44
1.6985412007E-12

1.4408701256E-03
1.2102954584E+49
2.4754171862E+00
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
1.2377085931E+00
6.0514772920E+48
7.2043506279E-04

2.8817402512E-03
1.2102954584E+49
9.9016687449E+00
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
9.9016687449E+00
1.2102954584E+49
2.8817402512E-03

2.4277872516E-05

5.0000000000E-01

1.0000000000E+00

1.2102660750E+49
-6.9960823900E-08
0.0000000000E+00

6.0514772920E+48
-7.2043506279E-04
1.2845613732E+28

3.7746611986E+72

3.7746611986E+72

3.7746611986E+72

2.0890123816E+08

2.9979245800E+10

4.2397056000E+10

net force
net acel.
distance
Energy of light
press
exp veloc.

0.0000000000E+00
0.0000000000E+00
1.2845925611E+28

alfa = 1

B=1

N=1

pi
4pi/3
G
K
z
h
c
hc/zK
r
q^2
mp
me
m
H
t
K1 = m^2*t
K2 = T^4*t^3

3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16
4.9651142317E+00
6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16
4.9651142317E+00
6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16
4.9651142317E+00
6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54

K3 = mf*t^(3/4)

3.4973586787E-23

3.4973586787E-23

3.4973586787E-23

K4 = T^4/te

1.3217507250E+14

1.3217507250E+14

1.3217507250E+14

millions of years

1.8328189176E-02

6.9558480591E-39

5.0360913155E-51

/tp
/tp*
mx = h/C^2.t
C^5/H^2/G = u
u/h
m

S
q^2
q
l
dm
f
1/f
H
mx= hH/c^2
Nx = mxo/mx

5.7799777385E+11
4.2771473078E+54
2.3334412257E+50
1.2755234596E-59
1.2121725304E+83
1.8293989093E+109
3.3609180458E-23
1.0000000000E+00
2.6349323648E+36
2.6349323648E+36
1.9864458242E-16
1.4094132908E-08
6.5762360983E-15
2.8212210985E+19
4.5587240713E+24
2.1935962439E-25
1.7301104697E-12
1.2755234596E-59
1.3589847481E+110

2.1935962439E-25
1.6232474749E+18
8.8557917345E+13
3.3609180458E-23
1.7459246400E+10
2.6349323648E+36
5.4556017313E-05
6.1604901006E-19
1.0000000000E+00
1.6232474749E+18
3.2244931682E+02
1.7956873804E+01
4.0512837382E-33
1.9587367286E+92
7.3999373377E+42

1.5881817572E-37
1.1752445484E+06
6.4116661932E+01
4.6420991601E-11
9.1519262738E-15
1.3811997487E+12
6.4116661932E+01
5.2418793252E-25
7.2400824064E-13
1.3811997487E+12
3.7895680174E+08
1.9466812829E+04
3.4471836041E-39
3.7367070225E+116
8.6967360149E+48
1.1498566799E-49
6.2965085415E+36
4.6420991601E-11
3.7341230070E+61

1.3513627945E-43
4.5587240713E+24
3.3609180458E-23
5.1575697587E+73

Mx = Nx. Mx
mx.
R
V
M
Dm
E= M C^2
N
Nmp
T
0
R/lo
ffot
mfo=hfo/c^2
efo
te
Et
Mt
rg
lg
mg
mmf/mg
Mt/Mx
Nf
mmf
Tm
Tx
Nfo
Nf/Nfo

1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48
1.7327937334E+22
2.1793612030E+67
2.3334412257E+50
1.0706996263E-17
2.0971923859E+71
6.9428685673E+72
4.2771473078E+54
6.9171083684E+04
4.1892828224E-06
4.1362538813E+27
7.1561761454E+15
5.2758888605E-32
4.7417324358E-11
1.7320034849E+05
3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
2.4957893364E-51
1.7327937334E+22
1.2755234596E-59
1.3259261718E+26
2.4228891086E+00
2.4832976489E+84
1.6912499378E-33
2.2173631363E+03
1.6723126698E-23
7.9605107410E+82
3.1195205052E+01

1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48
6.5762360983E-15
1.1912990611E-42
8.8557917345E+13
7.4337267807E+55
7.9591886832E+34
1.6232474749E+18
1.6232474749E+18
1.4305455267E+32
2.0256414583E-33
3.2464956082E+18
1.4799877677E+43
1.0911205675E-04
9.8065026070E+16
3.1685252862E+114
3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
4.0512837382E-33
6.5762360983E-15
3.3609180458E-23
1.0407034039E+17
2.4228891086E+00
1.2007474511E+57
3.4977188504E-06
4.5857875094E+30
4.4064307778E+13
3.8491410749E+55
3.1195205052E+01

1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48
4.7612491276E-27
4.5211751050E-79
6.4116661932E+01
1.4181415327E+80
5.7625181954E+22
1.0000000000E+00
1.1752445484E+06
1.8226112711E+41
1.5899014633E-42
2.9946818955E+15
1.8856040134E+52
1.3901610312E+05
1.2494144260E+26
8.3488498254E+150
3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
4.7612491276E-27
4.7612491276E-27
4.6420991601E-11
9.5998147486E+13
2.4228891086E+00
9.4245214108E+47
4.4563291982E+03
5.8426018924E+39
6.0861610827E+25
3.0211442416E+46
3.1195205052E+01

Acel g
Force g
Pre g
Pow g
G.M^2/R^2
M/R
Pre rad
Force rad
Acel rad

5.1867407032E-02
1.2102954584E+49
3.2076561135E+03
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
5.7733449498E+04
2.1783672954E+50
9.3354281710E-01

1.3666710947E+35
1.2102954584E+49
2.2270334805E+76
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
1.0561750954E+114
5.7398504892E+86
6.4814650811E+72

1.8876457725E+47
1.2102954584E+49
4.2485401558E+100
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
2.7829499418E+150
7.9278800530E+98
1.2364773546E+97

Force rad/Force g

1.7998640582E+01

4.7425200593E+37

6.5503675139E+49

net force
net acel.
distance
Energy of light
press
exp veloc.

2.0573377496E+50
8.8167541007E-01
1.2846220163E+28

5.7398504892E+86
6.4814650811E+72
1.2846237491E+28

7.9278800530E+98
1.2364773546E+97
1.2846237491E+28

3.7746611986E+72

3.7746611986E+72

3.7746611986E+72

1.7986868228E+11

2.9197138434E+29

3.4313777774E+35

L
Nx = 1

pi
4pi/3
G
K

3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16

UNIFICACION
a= B
3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16

4.9651142317E+00

4.9651142317E+00

4.9651142317E+00

h
c
hc/zK
r
q^2
mp
me
m
H
t
K1 = m^2*t
K2 = T^4*t^3

6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

6.6260700400E-27
2.9979245800E+10
2.8977723268E-01
6.5762360983E-15

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54

6.5289299779E-34
4.4205515938E+54

K3 = mf*t^(3/4)

3.4973586787E-23

3.4973586787E-23

3.4973586787E-23

K4 = T^4/te

1.3217507250E+14

1.3217507250E+14

1.3217507250E+14

millions of years

4.2851433109E-57

2.6398582946E-75

1.3486677611E-112

/tp
/tp*
mx = h/C^2.t
C^5/H^2/G = u
u/h
m

S
q^2
q
l
dm
f
1/f
H
mx= hH/c^2
Nx = mxo/mx

1.3513627945E-43

8.3250571180E-62
6.1604901006E-19
3.3609180458E-23
8.8557917345E+13
2.5147021337E-63
3.7951638279E-37
8.8557917345E+13
3.7951638279E-37
3.7951638279E-37
1.0000000000E+00
5.2341503931E+20
2.2878265653E+10
2.4957893364E-51
1.3599251664E+165
1.2011929598E+61
8.3250571180E-62
1.2011929598E+61
8.8557917345E+13
1.9573822188E+37

4.2531586513E-99
3.1473107507E-56
1.7170473980E-60
1.7334169275E+51
6.5634967221E-138
9.9055649615E-112
3.9180070570E+32
8.5781316800E-56
1.9388976723E-74
2.2602796793E-19
2.3157091757E+39
4.8121816006E+19
5.6411819210E-70
5.2103426916E+239
5.3143554347E+79
1.8816957433E-80
2.3511937409E+98
1.7334169275E+51
1.0000000000E+00

1.0000000000E+00
5.4556017313E-05
5.4556017313E-05
6.6260700400E-27
1.0000000000E+00

6.9508037462E+04
4.8352941164E-28
6.1604901006E-19
1.2740672961E+09
4.1082212920E+11
6.4095407729E+05
3.1798035714E-42
5.1611388003E+128
9.4280181549E+51
1.0606683012E-52
7.3999373377E+42
5.4556017313E-05
3.1773157442E+55

Nf0 = 2
3.1415926536E+00
4.1887902048E+00
6.6740800000E-08
1.3806485200E-16

Mx = Nx. Mx
mx.
R
V
M
Dm
E= M C^2
N
Nmp
T
0
R/lo
ffot
mfo=hfo/c^2
efo

1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48
4.0512837382E-33
2.7852654477E-97
5.4556017313E-05
1.9587367286E+92
4.9032503091E+16
7.8488789649E-10
1.0000000000E+00
6.5056431218E+45
4.4542442194E-47
9.0953336609E+13
6.7304899156E+56
4.9620518067E+09
4.4596697584E+30

1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48
2.4957893364E-51
6.5119698885E-152
3.3609180458E-23
5.1611388003E+128
3.0206424990E-02
3.7951638279E-37
6.1604901006E-19
2.9585491436E+59
9.7945722252E-61
2.5481351089E+09
3.0608019534E+70
2.2565753836E+23
2.0281088122E+44

1.7334169275E+51
7.3724972014E-48
1.2750648863E-88
8.6833132269E-264
1.7170473980E-60
1.9774104114E+203
1.5432052411E-39
4.3824510091E-93
3.1473107507E-56
2.7531857731E+87
1.0525160907E-88
1.2114445543E+00
2.8483408535E+98

te

1.3552249398E+169

5.7964967026E+223

6.18291281571405E+336

Et
Mt
rg
lg
mg
mmf/mg
Mt/Mx
Nf
mmf
Tm
Tx
Nfo
Nf/Nfo

3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
5.1616081180E-24
4.0512837382E-33
5.4556017313E-05
2.9156191298E+12
2.4228891086E+00
2.6403598578E+43
1.5906456772E+08
2.0854629518E+44
7.1527276334E+31
8.4639926341E+41
3.1195205052E+01

3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
6.5762360983E-15
2.4957893364E-51
8.8557917345E+13
8.1683550554E+07
2.4228891086E+00
5.8059670854E+29
7.2337251183E+21
9.4839887688E+57
1.1610647070E+50
1.8611729193E+28
3.1195205052E+01

3.7746611986E+72
4.1998769942E+51
2.9094789279E+04
1.2750648863E-88
1.7334169275E+51
3.8834319321E-02
2.4228891086E+00
6.2390410104E+01
6.7316066478E+49
8.8256715315E+85
2.2726474123E+87

Acel g
Force g
Pre g
Pow g
G.M^2/R^2
M/R
Pre rad
Force rad
Acel rad

2.2184454035E+53
1.2102954584E+49
5.8680825953E+112
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
4.5174164659E+168
9.3171978130E+104
1.7078222114E+109

3.6010858995E+71
1.2102954584E+49
1.5462000750E+149
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
1.9321655675E+223
1.5124117823E+123
4.4999960181E+145

7.0487015081E+108
1.2102954584E+49
5.9240261591E+223
3.6283745038E+59
1.2102954584E+49
1.3466353096E+28
0.0000000000E+00
1.2582203995E+72
50 e+563

Force rad/Force g

7.6982837110E+55

1.2496219595E+74

50 e+463

net force
net acel.
distance
Energy of light
press
exp veloc.

9.3171978130E+104
1.7078222114E+109
1.2846237491E+28

1.5124117823E+123
4.4999960181E+145
1.2846237491E+28

1.2846237491E+28

3.7746611986E+72

3.7746611986E+72

3.7746611986E+72

3.7199119217E+38

4.7394181237E+47

2.0968281788E+66

2.0999384971E+51
1.8873305993E+72

2.0000000000E+00
3.1195205052E+01