Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Revisiting the
he principal traditionalist
critique of the past four decades of Church history has been
that dramatic breaks with tradition
have been portrayed as something
normal, even salutary. The older
idea of continuity in Church history,
of a sense that we are in some way
bound not only by sacred Tradition
but also by ecclesiastical traditions
that are not strictly de fide (and the
Second Council of Nicaea insisted
that we were indeed so bound) has
given way to the suggestion that we
must accede to a constant barrage
of novelty and innovation as long as
authority approves it, regardless of
its lack of conformity to everything
that has gone before. With that said,
the following contextualization of the
American War for Independence may
carry greater resonance.
Nothing in the world is more
important to me than the restoration of authentic Catholic tradition.
Having said that, I suspect I am not
alone in observing that among some
traditionalists there is at times a lack
of appreciation of nuance. This is
evident among the sedevacantists
who, understandably appalled at the
present state of the Church and the
50
American
Revolution
Spring 2003
History
51
History
view of British
of its constituconstitutionalism
tionally authoas something
rized powers, the
outdated and oldSupreme Court
fashioned. It was
can be counted on
these competing
to provide a sufviews of the Britficiently dishonest
ish constitution
interpretation of
and the American
the Constitution
insistence on
to justify the fedmaintaining the
eral usurpation.
it was taken for granted older and tradiIt was precisely
this type of politithat the governing authority tional one that
made the conflict
cal order that the
was
not
unlimited,
but
between the two
colonists attempted
to prevent.
rather was circumscribed sides perhaps
This
James Otis, in
by custom and tradition. inevitable.
philosophical
The Rights of
division also sheds light on the lesser
the British Colonies Asserted and
controversies of the 1760s and 1770s
Proved (1763), developed the idea
that led to the break with Britain,
that something external to Parliasince in many cases the issue can be
ment limited any presumption of
reduced to a question of constitutionunrestricted authority on the part of
alism: is this measure, which breaks
that body:
with longstanding tradition, thereby
unconstitutional and void, or is it
To say the parliament is absolute
constitutional by virtue of its having
and arbitrary, is a contradiction.
been lawfully passed by the British
The parliament cannot make 2 and
Parliament?
2, 5; Omnipotency cannot do it. The
Colonial spokesmen possessed
supreme power in a state, is jus dicea breathtaking command of Britre only jus dare, strictly speaking,
ish history and law. They use the
belongs alone to God. Parliaments
word innovation pejoratively, as in
are in all cases to declare what is
John Adams Braintree Instructions
parliament that makes it so: There
of 1765. They were well aware of
must be in every instance, a higher
the celebrated British documents
authority, viz. GOD. Should an act
to which they could appeal in their
of parliament be against any of his
defense, particularly the Magna Carta
natural laws, which are immutably
(1215), the Petition of Right (1628)
true, their declaration would be
and the Bill of Rights (1689).
contrary to eternal truth, equity and
The controversy surrounding the
justice, and consequently void.
Stamp Act of 1765 is instructive.
Explicitly designed as a revenue meaThe Americans, therefore, atsure for the British government, the
tempted to vindicate this older view
Act required that a wide variety of
of British constitutionalism over and
documents and other paper products
against the legal positivist variant
in the colonies from legal deeds to
with which they were increasingly
newspapers, from tavern licenses to
confronted after the French and Inwills bear revenue stamps, indicatdian War. In his outstanding study
ing in each case that this new tax had
Peripheries and Center, colonial
been paid.
historian Jack Greene notes that the
From the American point of view,
British considered this American
52
History
53