Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
NEWS RELEASE
Tne Commission found that Judge Buffmgton, in his official capaciry as Chancery
Court Judge, without proper authority, issued subpoenas commanding two (2) Sunpson
Cotrnty Supervisors* appear before him at a designated time and place to answer ,uesnons
about who "leaked" the information to the media about his appointment of Ohver Diaz as
SimpsonCounty Youth Courtpublic defender. During the meeting^ the supervisors on
February 11, 2009, Judge Buffingtor, admitted tha, he had failed to comply with me law
when issuing the subpoenas, but did not care.
The Commission's recommendations are filed with me Supreme Court which will
consider the Commission recommendations and determine the appropriate final dec.s.oa
A copy of the Commission findings and recommendation is enclosed herein for your
information.
If you have any questions, please contact John Toney, (601) 359-1273.
INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS
1. On September 1,2009. the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance
Chancellor, 13th Chancery Court District, State of Mississippi, with judicial misconduct
Recommendation was submitted and filed by counsel for the Commission and the
Respondent regarding Inquiry Concerning a Judge 2009-042/043 only. The Agreed Statement
of Facts and Proposed Recommendation was signed by Darlene D. Ballard, Senior Staff
Attorney of the Commission, by J. Ashley Ogden, attorney for Respondent, and by the
Respondent. It was accepted by the foil Commission on May 14,2010 at its regular monthly
meeting, PILED
MAY 2 7 2010
4. Based upon the pleadings and the Agreed Statement of Facts and Proposed
Recommendation and after considering Respondent's history with the Commission and other
factors delineated in Mississippi Comm'n on Judicial Performance v. Gibson. 883 So.2d 1155,
1158 (Miss, 2004), the Commission finds the following by clear and convincing evidence,
to wit:
Diaz as Youth Court Public Defender in Simpson County, Mississippi at a salary of $400,00
per month, plus retirement. When word of the Diaz hiring reached the media outlets it
became apparent that citizens of Simpson County were upset about the appointment.
County, asked the supervisors to appear before him on February 11,2009 to determine who
was upset about the Diaz hiring and who "leaked" the information to the media. When it
became apparent to Respondent that two (2) members of the Simpson County Board of
Supervisors, namely: William A, "Pete" Lowery and Randy Moore, would not appear as
requested, the Respondent, hi his official capacity as Chancellor, had subpoenas issued and
served upon the two supervisors commanding them to appear before the Chancery Court of
7. The issued subpoenas did not state a title or cause number of any action pending
before the court, nor did it express an identifiable reason for the supervisors being compelled
8. As a result of the issuance and service of the subpoenas described above, the two
supervisors hired an attorney to represent them. OnFebruary 10,20095 the attorney, Robert
Andrew Taggart, filed a Motion to Quash Subpoenas on behalf of the two supervisors and
9. During the meeting with the Simpson County Board of Supervisors onFebruary
11,2009, Respondent admitted that he had failed to comply with the law, specifically Rule
45 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure, when issuing the subpoenas, and stated that
he did not care that he had failed to comply with the law. At the same meeting Pete Lowery
stated that, prior to the issuance of the subpoenas, he had told the Chancery Clerk a
10. By engaging in the above stated conduct, the Respondent violated Canons 15
11. By engaging in the above stated conduct the Respondent has also violated
willful misconduct in office and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which
RECOMMENDATION
12. Section 177A of the Mississippi Constitution provides that upon
censured or reprimanded by the Supreme Court. To so sanction a judge, the Court must find
one or more enumerated grounds for sanction., including willful misconduct in office and
conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice which brings the judicial office into
disrepute. The Commission finds by clear and convincing evidence that the Respondent's
conduct herein constitutes each of the above enumerated grounds and recommends to the
Mississippi Supreme Court that the Respondent be publicly reprimanded pursuant to Section
177A of the Mississippi Constitution of 1890, as amended, and be assessed costs of this
MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION ON
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE