Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

Writing an Introduction

What is it?
An introduction is the first paragraph of a written research paper, or the first thing you
say in an oral presentation, or the first thing people see, hear, or experience about your
project.
It has two parts:
1. A general introduction to the topic you will be discussing
2. Your Thesis Statement

Why do it?
Without an introduction it is sometimes very difficult for your audience to figure out what
you are trying to say. There needs to be a thread of an idea that they will follow through
your paper or presentation. The introduction gives the reader the beginning of the piece of
thread so they can follow it.
When do I do it?
Many books recommend writing your introduction last, after you finish your project. This
is to make sure that you introduce what you are actually going to say.
If your project changes in the creating process, it is important to make sure that your
introduction accurately reflects what you will be saying. If, however, you have written a
good outline and stick to it, then it is fine to start writing your introduction first. Just
make sure in your proofreading that you have kept the thread consistent throughout the
paper.
How do I do it?
Start with a couple of sentences that introduce your topic to your reader. You do not have
to give too much detailed information; save that for the body of your paper. Make these
sentences as interesting as you can. Through them, you can hook a reader and get them
very interested in the line of thinking you are going to develop in your project.
Then state your thesis, which may be done in one or more sentences. The length of your
introduction depends on the length and complexity of your project, but generally it should

not exceed one page unless it is a very long project or a book. The average length of an
introduction is one half a page.
Some Examples:
For the example, the regular text is the general introduction to the topic. The BOLD text
is the writer's Thesis Statement.
Example 1
Teenagers in many American cities have been involved in more gangs in the last five
years than ever before. These gangs of teens have been committing a lot of violent
crimes. The victims of these crimes are both gang members and people outside of gangs.
Many people do not want to travel to areas in our cities because of the danger from this
problem. For this terrible situation to stop, it is going to take a combined effort on the part of many
people. Excellent, supervised after-school programs, more jobs available for teens, and healthy family
relationships will go a long way towards ending this crisis in our society.

Example 2
During the Middle Ages in Europe and the Middle East there was much armed conflict
between Christians and Muslims. Christians called these conflicts the Crusades because
they were fighting under the sign of the cross to save the holy lands of the Bible from
being desecrated by non-Christians. However, the true reason for fighting for these lands was
less than holy. It was mainly a desire for economic gain that prompted the Christian leaders to send
soldiers to fight in the Holy Land.

An introduction gives the reader an idea of where you are going in your project so they
can follow along. You can give them more background details and supporting evidence
for your thesis in the body of the paper itself.

Introductions
What this handout is about
This handout will explain the functions of introductions, offer strategies for writing
effective ones, help you check your drafted introductions, and provide you with examples
of introductions to be avoided.

The Role of Introductions


Introductions and conclusions can be the most difficult parts of papers to write. Usually
when you sit down to respond to an assignment, you have at least some sense of what you
want to say in the body of your paper. You might have chosen a few examples you want
to use or have an idea that will help you answer the question: these sections, therefore,
are not as hard to write. But these middle parts of the paper can't just come out of thin air;
they need to be introduced and they need to be concluded in a way that makes sense to
your reader.
What purpose do these sections serve? Your introduction and conclusion act as bridges
that transport your readers from their own lives into the "place" of your analysis. If your
readers pick up your paper about education in the autobiography of Frederick Douglass,
for example, they need a transition to help them leave behind the world of Chapel Hill,
network television, e-mail and the The Daily Tar Heel and to help them temporarily enter
the world of nineteenth-century American slavery. By providing an introduction that
helps your readers make a transition between their own world and the issues you will be
writing about, you give your readers the tools they need to get into your topic and care
about what you are saying. Similarly, once you've hooked your reader with the
introduction and offered evidence to prove your thesis, your conclusion can provide a
bridge to help your reader make the transition back to their daily lives. (See our handout
on conclusions.) Such a conclusion will help them see why all that analysis about
nineteenth-century education and American slavery should matter to them after they put
the paper down.

Why bother writing a good introduction?


1. You never get a second chance to make a first impression. The opening
paragraph of your paper will provide your readers with their initial impressions of
your argument, your writing style, and the overall quality of your work. A vague,
disorganized, error-filled, off-the-wall, or boring introduction will probably create
a negative impression. On the other hand, a concise, engaging, and well-written
introduction will start your readers off thinking highly of you, your analytical
skills, your writing, and your paper. This impression is especially important when
the audience you are trying to reach (your instructor) will be grading your work.
Do you want that audience to start off thinking "C+" or thinking "A"?

2. Your introduction is an important road map for the rest of your paper. Your
introduction conveys a lot of information to your readers. You can let them know
what your topic is, why it is important, and how you plan to proceed with your
discussion. It should contain a thesis that will assert your main argument. It will
also, ideally, give the reader a sense of the kinds of information you will use to
make that argument and the general organization of the paragraphs and pages that
will follow. After reading your introduction, your readers should not have any
major surprises in store when they read the main body of your paper.
3. Ideally, your introduction will make your readers want to read your paper.
The introduction should also capture your readers' interest, making them want to
read the rest of your paper. Opening with a compelling story, a fascinating
quotation, an interesting question, or a stirring example can get your readers to
see why this topic matters and serve as an invitation for them to join you for an
interesting intellectual conversation.

Strategies for Writing an Effective Introduction

Start by thinking about the question. Your entire essay will be a response to the
assigned question, and your introduction is the first step toward that end. Your
direct answer to the assigned question will be your thesis, and your thesis will be
included in your introduction, so it is a good idea to use the question as a jumping
off point. Imagine that you are assigned the following question:

Education has long been considered a major force for American social change, righting
the wrongs of our society. Drawing on The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass,
discuss the relationship between education and slavery in 19th century America.
Consider the following: How did white control of education reinforce slavery? How did
Douglass and other enslaved African Americans view education while they endured
slavery? And what role did education play in the acquisition of freedom? Most
importantly, consider the degree to which education was or was not a major force for
social change with regard to slavery.
You will probably refer back to this question extensively as you prepare your complete
essay, and the question itself can also give you some clues about how to approach the
introduction. Notice that the question starts with a broad statement, that education has
been considered a major force for social change, and then narrows to focus on specific
questions from the book. One strategy might be to use a similar model in your own
introduction -- start off with a big picture sentence or two about the power of education as
a force for change as a way of getting your reader interested and then focus in on the
details of your argument about Douglass. Of course, a different approach could also be
very successful, but looking at the way the professor set up the question can sometimes
give you some ideas for how you might answer it. (See our handout on Reading
Assignments for additional information on the hidden clues in assignments.)

Try writing your introduction last. You may think that you have to write your
introduction first, but that isn't necessarily true, and it isn't always the most

effective way to craft a good introduction. You may find that you don't know what
you are going to argue at the beginning of the writing process, and only through
the experience of writing your paper do you discover your main argument. It is
perfectly fine to start out thinking that you want to argue a particular point, but
wind up arguing something slightly or even dramatically different by the time
you've written most of the paper. The writing process can be an important way to
organize your ideas, think through complicated issues, refine your thoughts, and
develop a sophisticated argument. However, an introduction written at the
beginning of that discovery process will not necessarily reflect what you wind up
with at the end. You will need to revise your paper to make sure that the
introduction, all of the evidence, and the conclusion reflect the argument you
intend. Sometimes it helps to write up all of your evidence first and then write the
introduction -- that way you can be sure that the introduction matches the body of
the paper.
Don't be afraid to write a tentative introduction first and then change it later. Some
people find that they need to write some kind of introduction in order to get the
writing process started. That's fine, but if you are one of those people, be sure to
return to your initial introduction later and rewrite if need be.
Open with an attention grabber. Sometimes, especially if the topic of your paper is
somewhat dry or technical, opening with something catchy can help. Consider
these options:

1. an intriguing example (for example, the mistress who initially teaches Douglass
but then ceases her instruction as she learns more about slavery)
2. a provocative quotation, (Douglass writes that "education and slavery were
incompatible with each other")
3. a puzzling scenario, (Frederick Douglass says of slaves that "[N]othing has been
left undone to cripple their intellects, darken their minds, debase their moral
nature, obliterate all traces of their relationship to mankind; and yet how
wonderfully they have sustained the mighty load of a most frightful bondage,
under which they have been groaning for centuries!" Douglass clearly asserts that
slave owners went to great lengths to destroy the mental capacities of slaves, but
yet his own life story proves that these efforts could be unsuccessful.)
4. a vivid and perhaps unexpected anecdote (Learning about slavery in the American
history course at Frederick Douglass High School, students studied the work
slaves did, the impact of slavery on their families, and the rules that governed
their lives. We didn't discuss education, however, until one student, Mary, raised
her hand and asked, "But when did they go to school?" That modern high school
students could not conceive of an American childhood devoid of formal education
speaks volumes about the centrality of education to American youth today, and
also suggests the meanings of the deprivation of education to past generations."
5. a thought-provoking question (Given all of the freedoms that were denied
enslaved individuals in the American South, why does Frederick Douglass focus
his attentions so squarely on education and literacy?)

These attention-grabbing openers might get your reader interested and also help your
reader connect to what might otherwise seem a pretty obscure topic. Essentially, you can
use attention-grabbers to help your readers see why your topic is relevant and to help
them begin to care about your findings and perspectives.

Pay special attention to your first sentence. If any sentence in your paper is
going to be completely free of errors and vagueness, it should be your first one.
Start off on the right foot with your readers by making sure that the first sentence
actually says something useful and that it does so in an interesting and error-free
way.
Be straightforward and confident. Avoid statements like "In this paper, I will
argue that Frederick Douglass valued education." While this sentence points
toward your main argument, it isn't especially interesting. It might be more
effective to say what mean in a declarative sentence. It is much more convincing
to tell that "Frederick Douglass valued education" than to tell us that you are
going to say that he did. Assert your main argument confidently. After all, you
can't expect your reader to believe it if it doesn't sound like you believe it!

How to Evaluate Your Introduction Draft


Ask a friend to read it and then tell you what they expect the paper will discuss, what
kinds of evidence the paper will use, and what the tone of the paper will be. If your friend
is able to predict the rest of your paper accurately, you probably have a good
introduction.

Five Kinds of Less Effective Introductions


1. The Place Holder Introduction. When you don't have much to say on a given topic, it
is easy to create this kind of introduction. Essentially, this kind of weaker introduction
contains several sentences that are vague and don't really say much. They exist just to
take up the "introduction space" in your paper. If you had something more effective to
say, you would probably say it, but in the meantime this paragraph is just a place holder.
Weak Example: Slavery was one of the greatest tragedies in American history. There
were many different aspects of slavery. Each created different kinds of problems for
enslaved people.
2. The Restated Question Introduction. Restating the question can be an effective
strategy, but it can be easy to stop at JUST restating the question instead of offering a
more effective, interesting introduction to your paper. The professor or teaching assistant
wrote your questions and will be reading ten to seventy essays in response to them--they
do not need to read a whole paragraph that simply restates the question. Try to do
something more interesting.

Weak Example: Indeed, education has long been considered a major force for American
social change, righting the wrongs of our society. The Narrative of the Life of Frederick
Douglass discusses the relationship between education and slavery in 19th century
America, showing how white control of education reinforced slavery and how Douglass
and other enslaved African Americans viewed education while they endured. Moreover,
the book discusses the role that education played in the acquisition of freedom.
Education was a major force for social change with regard to slavery.
3. The Webster's Dictionary Introduction. This introduction begins by giving the
dictionary definition of one or more of the words in the assigned question. This
introduction strategy is on the right track--if you write one of these, you may be trying to
establish the important terms of the discussion, and this move builds a bridge to the
reader by offering a common, agreed-upon definition for a key idea. You may also be
looking for an authority that will lend credibility to your paper. However, anyone can
look a word up in the dictionary and copy down what Webster says - it may be far more
interesting for you (and your reader) if you develop your own definition of the term in the
specific context of your class and assignment. Also recognize that the dictionary is also
not a particularly authoritative work -- it doesn't take into account the context of your
course and doesn't offer particularly detailed information. If you feel that you must seek
out an authority, try to find one that is very relevant and specific. Perhaps a quotation
from a source reading might prove better? Dictionary introductions are also ineffective
simply because they are so overused. Many graders will see twenty or more papers that
begin in this way, greatly decreasing the dramatic impact that any one of those papers
will have. You might find a more creative way to define your terms, or perhaps you could
weave a definition into a more attention-grabbing introductory paragraph.
Weak Example: Webster's dictionary defines slavery as "the state of being a slave," as
"the practice of owning slaves," and as "a condition of hard work and subjection."
4. The Dawn of Man Introduction. This kind of introduction generally makes broad
sweeping statements about the relevance of this topic since the beginning of time. It is
usually very general (similar to the place holder introduction) and fails to connect to the
thesis. You may write this kind of introduction when you don't have much to say--which
is precisely why it is ineffective.
Weak Example: Since the dawn of man, slavery has been a problem in human history.
5. The Book Report Introduction. This introduction is what you had to do for
your fifth-grade book reports. It gives the name and author of the book you are
writing about, tells what the book is about, and offers other basic facts about the
book. You might resort to this sort of introduction when you are trying to fill
space because it's a familiar, comfortable format. It is ineffective because it offers
details that your reader already

Guide to Writing Introductions and


Conclusions
First and last impressions are important in any part of life, especially in
writing. This is why the introduction and conclusion of any paper - whether
it be a simple essay or a long research paper - are essential. Introductions
and conclusions are just as important as the body of your paper. What?!?!
The introduction is what makes the reader want to continue reading your
paper. The conclusion is what makes your paper stick in the reader's mind.
How do I write a good introduction? How do I write a conclusion that
makes an impact?
These are some of the questions that you may ask yourself as you write.
Don't worry, there are many ways to write both and you should choose the
method that feels the most comfortable to you. Choose the style that fits
your personality best.

Introductions
Suppose you are introducing a friend to your brother Joe. Would you say
"Hey, Joe, this is Tina," and then walk away leaving them there together?
Of course not! You would tell Joe a little about Tina's background: where
she's from, where she went to school, where she works, and any other
important information that will make Joe want to get to know Tina better,
right? Well, introducing your paper to your reader is the exact same thing.
You want the reader to want to know more about your paper. You want to
get the reader interested in what you might have to say.
There are several ways to write a good introduction or opening to your
paper.
Thesis Statement Opening
This is the traditional style of opening a paper. This is a "mini-summary" of
your paper.
For example:
Gallaudet University, the only liberal arts college for deaf students in the world, is
world-renowned in the field of deafness and education of the deaf. Gallaudet's
charter was signed by President Abraham Lincoln. Gallaudet owes its rich history
and fame to two men: Amos Kendall and Edward Miner Gallaudet.

Opening with a Story (Anecdote)


A good way of catching your reader's attention is by sharing a story that
sets up your paper. Sharing a story gives a paper a more personal feel and
helps make your reader comfortable.
This example was borrowed from Jack Gannon's The Week the World
Heard Gallaudet (1989):
Astrid Goodstein, a Gallaudet faculty member, entered the beauty salon for her
regular appointment proudly wearing her DPN button. ("I was married to that
button that week!" she later confided.) When Sandy, her regular hairdresser, saw
the button, he spoke and gestured, "Never! Never! Never!" Offended, Astrid
turned around and headed for the door, but stopped short of leaving. She
decided to keep her appointment, confessing later that at that moment her sense
of principles had lost out to her vanity. Later she realized that her hairdresser had
thought she was pushing for a deaf U.S. President.
Specific Detail Opening
Giving specific details about your subject appeals to your reader's
curiosity and helps establish a visual picture of what your paper is about.
For example:
Hands flying, green eyes flashing, and spittle spraying Jenny howled at her
younger sister Emma. People walk by gawking at the spectacle as Jenny's grunts
emanate through the mall. Emma sucks at her thumb trying to appear
nonchalant. Jenny's blond hair stands almost on end. Her hands seemed to fly so
fast that her signs could barely be understood. Jenny was angry. Very angry.
Open with a Quotation
Another method of writing an introduction is to open with a quotation. This
method makes your introduction more interactive and more appealing to
your reader.
For example:
"Deaf people can do anything except hear," President I. King Jordan stated in his
acceptance speech as thousands of deaf students and staff of Gallaudet
University cheered. President Jordan's selection as the first deaf president of a
university proved to be a monumental event for Gallaudet University and for deaf
people all over the world.
Open with an Interesting Statistic

Statistics that grab the reader help to make an effective introduction.


For example:
American Sign Language is the second most preferred foreign language in the
United States. 50% of all deaf and hard of hearing people use ASL. ASL is
beginning to be provided under the Foreign Language Department in many
universities and high schools around the nation.*
*The statistics are not accurate. They were invented as an example.

Question Openings
Possibly the easiest opening is one that presents one or more questions to
be answered in the paper. This is effective because questions are usually
what the reader has in mind when he or she sees your topic.
For example:
Is ASL a language? Can ASL be written? Do you have to be born deaf to
understand ASL completely? To answer these questions, one must first
understand exactly what ASL is. In this paper, I attempt to explain this as well as
answer my own questions.

Conclusions
The conclusion to any paper is the final impression that can be made. It is
the last opportunity to get your point across to the reader and leave the
reader feeling as if he or she learned something. Leaving a paper
"dangling" without a proper conclusion can seriously devalue what was
said in the body itself. Here are a few effective ways to conclude or close
your paper.
Summary Closing
Many times conclusions are simple re-statements of the thesis. Many times
these conclusions are much like their introductions (see Thesis Statement
Opening).
For example:
Because of a charter signed by President Abraham Lincoln and because of the
work of two men, Amos Kendall and Edward Miner Gallaudet, Gallaudet
University is what it is today - the place where people from all over the world can
find information about deafness and deaf education. Gallaudet and the deaf

community truly owe these three men for without them, we might still be "deaf
and dumb."
Close with a Logical Conclusion
This is a good closing for argumentive or opinion papers that present two
or more sides of an issue. The conclusion drawn as a result of the research
is presented here in the final paragraphs.
For example:
As one can see from reading the information presented, mainstreaming deaf
students isn't always as effective as educating them in a segregated classroom.
Deaf students learn better in a more one-on-one basis like they can find in a
school or program specially designed for them. Mainstreaming is just that; deaf
students get lost in the mainstream.
Real or Rhetorical Question Closings
This method of concluding a paper is one step short of giving a logical
conclusion. Rather than handing the conclusion over, you can leave the
reader with a question that causes him or her to draw his own conclusions.
For example:
Why, then, are schools for the deaf becoming a dying species?
Close with a Speculation or Opinion
This is a good style for instances when the writer was unable to come up
with an answer or a clear decision about whatever it was he or she was
researching.
For example:
Through all of my research, all of the people I interviewed, all of the institutions I
visited, not one person could give me a clear-cut answer to my question. Can all
deaf people be educated in the same manner? I couldn't find the "right" answer. I
hope you, the reader, will have better luck.
Close with a Recommendation
A good conclusion is when the writer suggests that the reader do
something in the way of support for a cause or a plea for them to take
action.

For example:
American Sign Language is a fast growing language in America. More and more
universities and colleges are offering it as part of their curriculum and some are
even requiring it as part of their program. This writer suggests that anyone who
has a chance to learn this beautiful language should grab that opportunity.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen