Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 13-1415
NANCYE M. ONEAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:11-cv-01239-RBH)
Submitted:
Decided:
August 9, 2013
PER CURIAM:
Nancye
ONeal
(ONeal)
brought
this
sex
and
age
discrimination action against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (WalMart), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act, 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq., in the United States District
Court for the District of South Carolina.
In her complaint,
the
close
judgment
of
as
discovery,
to
each
of
Wal-Mart
ONeals
filed
motion
remaining
for
claims,
her
claims.
Specifically,
with
regard
to
ONeals
direct
evidence
of
sex
or
age
discrimination
nor
Moreover, Wal-
United
recommendation
States
in
ONeals claims.
sound,
and
Magistrate
which
she
Judge
filed
recommended
report
dismissing
and
each
of
agreeing
that
there
were
no
genuine
issues
of
the
magistrate
judges
report
and
recommendation
and
err
in
granting
summary
judgment
in
favor
of
Wal-Mart.
ONeal v. Wal-Mart
March 5, 2013).
- 3 -