Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2d 573
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
Virginia, at Roanoke.
Leon David Organ, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Katherine Baldwin Toone, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Leon David Organ, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying his
petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 (1988). Organ
Organ is being detained pursuant to a July 1989 judgment of the Circuit Court
of the City of Lynchburg, where he pled guilty to possession of cocaine with
intent to distribute and possession of a firearm while in possession of cocaine.
He was sentenced to thirty years and five years in prison, respectively.
Organ petitioned for appeal of his conviction and sentence in the Court of
Appeals of Virginia. The petition was dismissed because the transcript from the
sentencing hearing was not timely filed. Organ next filed a petition for a writ of
habeas corpus in the Virginia Supreme Court. That petition was dismissed
based upon Organ's guilty pleas.
Organ filed the present petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 2254. The district court dismissed the appeal as meritless.
Second, Organ alleges ineffective assistance of counsel during the state appeal
process, in that counsel failed to file the hearing transcript in a timely manner.
The Virginia Court of Appeals dismissed Organ's appeal because the transcript
was not timely filed.
10
11
Organ pled guilty and the court accepted his pleas as voluntarily and
intelligently made. Counsel was under no obligation to seek withdrawal of the
pleas where no basis to do so existed. Therefore, Organ's claim of ineffective
assistance of counsel at sentencing is without merit.
12
13
14
15
Organ alleges no jurisdictional defects, nor does he challenge the validity of his
15
Organ alleges no jurisdictional defects, nor does he challenge the validity of his
guilty pleas. Organ has not shown that his sentences would have been vacated
or his convictions overturned had counsel not erred. Therefore, Organ's request
for habeas relief must be denied. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not significantly aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED