Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 10-4817
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:10-cr-00134-HMH-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Christopher Darrell Ledbetter challenges the
procedural
district
reasonableness
court
following
of
his
the
sentence
guilty
plea
imposed
to
one
by
count
the
of
924(a)(2)
and
924(e)
(2006).
For
the
reasons
an
552
court
abuse
U.S.
reviews
of
38,
sentence
for
discretion
standard.
51
see
(2007);
Gall
also
reasonableness,
United
v.
United
States
v.
of
sentence.
Gall,
552
U.S.
at
51.
In
court
properly
range,
calculated
considered
the
18
the
defendants
U.S.C.
advisory
3553(a)
(2006)
Id.
has
reasoned
basis
decisionmaking authority.
for
exercising
[its]
own
legal
356 (2007).
At
district
his
court
sentencing
to
impose
hearing,
his
Ledbetter
120-month
asked
sentence
to
the
run
the
comment.
the
defendant
is
presently
serving
without
further
district
courts
explanation
for
imposing
the
sentence
consecutively.
Assuming, without deciding, that the district courts
explanation of the sentence was inadequate, we conclude that any
error was harmless.
268 (2005) (noting that appellate courts may apply the plain
error
and
harmless
error
doctrines
in
determining
whether
sentence
any
consecutive
serving.
The
record
to
in
sentence
this
case,
[Ledbetter]
however,
is
now
establishes
state
custody
for
some
pending
charges.
(J.A.
39).
Thus,
See 18
U.S.C. 3584.
Accordingly, we affirm the district courts judgment.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
legal
AFFIRMED