Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 13-4251
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:12-cr-00181-D-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Quentin
Earl
Battle
appeals
the
district
courts
has
moved
to
dismiss
the
appeal
as
We
the
Supreme
Court
held
that
the
suppression
by
In
the
Id. at 87.
A failure to disclose
in
that
its
suppression
prejudiced
the
defendant.
United States v. Sterling, 724 F.3d 482, 511 (4th Cir. 2013).
The burden of proving a Brady violation rests with the
defendant.
Cir. 2011).
Id. at 702.
U.S. 39, 57-58 & n.15 (1987); King, 628 F.3d at 703-04.
At
sentencing,
Battle
objected
to
the
probation
under
(2012).
U.S.
The
Sentencing
determination
Guidelines
was
based
Manual
partly
2D1.1(c)(1)
on
eighteen
Battle
He
that the drug profits seized from Battle would represent 220
kilograms
of
cocaine
based
on
the
officers
to
why
he
believed
the
eighteen
knowledge
and
He also testified
cooperator
statements
district
court
denied
Battles
Brady
claim
and
We
conclude that the district court did not err in denying Battles
Brady claim, because he failed to show a reasonable probability
that the result of the sentencing proceeding would have been
different if the evidence had been disclosed.
Battle next contends that his counsel was ineffective
in not objecting to the enhancement under USSG 2D1.1(b)(1) for
possessing a dangerous weapon.
See United
States v. Powell, 680 F.3d 350, 359 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,
133 S. ct. 376 (2012).
cannot
conclude
that
conclusively
shows
that
counsels
See Strickland v.
Battle
unreasonable.
next
contends
his
sentence
is
substantively
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART;
AFFIRMED IN PART