Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
No. 13-4242
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:12-cr-00004-D-1)
Submitted:
FLOYD,
Circuit
Judges,
and
HAMILTON,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
Randy
Wesley
Jones
pled
guilty
pursuant
to
plea
counsel
California,
view,
386
there
questioning
error when
filed
U.S.
are
whether
it
a
738
no
the
accepted
sentencing hearing.
brief
in
(1967),
meritorious
district
Jones
accordance
stating
that,
issues
court
guilty
with
for
in
and
v.
counsels
appeal,
committed
plea
Anders
but
reversible
during
Jones
We affirm.
Fed. R.
There
is
strong
presumption
that
defendants
1995).
Additionally,
in
the
absence
of
motion
to
error occurred, that the error was plain, and that the error
affected his substantial rights.
478 F.3d 247, 249 (4th Cir. 2007).
judicial
proceedings.
Id.
(internal
quotation
marks
omitted).
Jones has not presented any evidence or argument to
demonstrate plain error.
offense
attested
to
during
which
the
he
was
hearing
pleading
that
3
he
guilty.
fully
Jones
understood
also
the
him
outside
agreement.
those
made
by
the
Government
in
his
plea
Accordingly, we
U.S. 38, 51 (2007); see also United States v. Layton, 564 F.3d
330, 335 (4th Cir. 2009).
both
the
procedural
sentence.
district
and
substantive
properly
reasonableness
of
the
calculated
the
advisory
Guidelines
4951; United States v. Lynn, 592 F.3d 572, 57576 (4th Cir.
2010).
we
review
the
substantive
reasonableness
of
the
sentence,
sentence
3553(a).
it
chose
satisfied
the
standards
set
forth
in
range,
assistance
motion,
considered
the
granted
treated
applicable
the
the
Governments
Guidelines
3553(a)
as
factors.
substantial
advisory,
and
Moreover,
the
we
conclude
that
Jones
sentence
is
both
affirm
the
district
courts
judgment.
This
We
court
the
Supreme
Court
of
the
United
States
for
further
review.
move
in
representation.
this
and
materials
legal
before
for
leave
to
withdraw
from
court
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED